The geologic record of the Proterozoic Eon is more complete than that for the precedingArchean Eon. In contrast to the deep-water deposits of the Archean, the Proterozoic features manystrata that were laid down in extensive shallowepicontinental seas; furthermore, many of those rocks are lessmetamorphosed than Archean rocks, and many are unaltered.[10]: 315 Studies of these rocks have shown that the eon continued the massivecontinental accretion that had begun late in the Archean Eon. The Proterozoic Eon also featured the first definitivesupercontinent cycles andwholly modern[clarify] mountain building activity (orogeny).[10]: 315–318, 329–332
There is evidence that the first known glaciations occurred during the Proterozoic. The first began shortly after the beginning of the Proterozoic Eon, and evidence of at least four during the Neoproterozoic Era at the end of the Proterozoic Eon, possibly climaxing with the hypothesizedSnowball Earth of theSturtian andMarinoan glaciations.[10]: 320–321, 325
One of the most important events of the Proterozoic was theaccumulation of oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere. Though oxygen is believed to have been released byphotosynthesis as far back as the Archean Eon, it could not build up to any significant degree until mineral sinks of unoxidizedsulfur andiron had been exhausted. Until roughly 2.3 Ga, oxygen was probably only 1% to 2% of its current level.[10]: 323 Thebanded iron formations, which provide most of the world'siron ore, are one mark of that mineral sink process. Their accumulation ceased after 1.9 Ga, after the iron in the oceans had all beenoxidized.[10]: 324
Red beds, which are colored byhematite, indicate an increase in atmospheric oxygen 2 Ga. Such massive iron oxide formations are not found in older rocks.[10]: 324 The oxygen buildup was probably due to two factors: Exhaustion of the chemical sinks, and an increase incarbon sequestration, which sequesteredorganic compounds that would have otherwise been oxidized by the atmosphere.[10]: 325
The first surge in atmospheric oxygen at the beginning of the Proterozoic is called theGreat Oxygenation Event, or alternately theOxygen Catastrophe – to reflect the mass extinction of almost all life on Earth, which at the time was virtually allobligate anaerobic. A second, later surge in oxygen concentrations is called theNeoproterozoic Oxygenation Event,[11] occurred during the Middle and Late Neoproterozoic[12] and drove the rapid evolution of multicellular life towards the end of the era.[13][14]
The Proterozoic Eon was a very tectonically active period in the Earth's history. Oxygen changed the chemistry allowing for extensive geological changes. Volcanism was also extensive resulting in more geologic changes.
The late Archean Eon to Early Proterozoic Eon corresponds to a period of increasing crustal recycling, suggestingsubduction. Evidence for this increased subduction activity comes from the abundance of old granites originating mostly after 2.6 Ga.[15]
The occurrence ofeclogite (a type ofmetamorphic rock created by high pressure, > 1 GPa), is explained using a model that incorporates subduction. The lack of eclogites that date to the Archean Eon suggests that conditions at that time did not favor the formation of high grade metamorphism and therefore did not achieve the same levels of subduction as was occurring in the Proterozoic Eon.[16]
As a result of remelting ofbasalticoceanic crust due to subduction, the cores of the first continents grew large enough to withstand the crustal recycling processes.
The long-term tectonic stability of thosecratons is why we findcontinental crust ranging up to a few billion years in age.[17] It is believed that 43% of modern continental crust was formed in the Proterozoic, 39% formed in the Archean, and only 18% in thePhanerozoic.[15] Studies by Condie (2000)[18] and Rino et al. (2004)[19] suggest that crust production happened episodically. By isotopically calculating the ages of Proterozoic granitoids it was determined that there were several episodes of rapid increase in continental crust production. The reason for these pulses is unknown, but they seemed to have decreased in magnitude after every period.[15]
Evidence of collision and rifting between continents raises the question as to what exactly were the movements of the Archean cratons composing Proterozoic continents.Paleomagnetic and geochronological dating mechanisms have allowed the deciphering of Precambrian Supereon tectonics. It is known that tectonic processes of the Proterozoic Eon resemble greatly the evidence of tectonic activity, such asorogenic belts orophiolite complexes, we see today. Hence, most geologists would conclude that the Earth was active at that time. It is also commonly accepted that during the Precambrian, the Earth went through several supercontinent breakup and rebuilding cycles (Wilson cycle).[15]
In the late Proterozoic (most recent), the dominant supercontinent wasRodinia (~1000–750 Ma). It consisted of a series of continents attached to a central craton that forms the core of the North American Continent calledLaurentia. An example of an orogeny (mountain building processes) associated with the construction of Rodinia is theGrenville orogeny located in Eastern North America. Rodinia formed after the breakup of the supercontinentColumbia and prior to the assemblage of the supercontinentGondwana (~500 Ma).[20] The defining orogenic event associated with the formation of Gondwana was the collision of Africa, South America, Antarctica and Australia forming thePan-African orogeny.[21]
Columbia was dominant in the early-mid Proterozoic and not much is known about continental assemblages before then. There are a few plausible models that explain tectonics of the early Earth prior to the formation of Columbia, but the current most plausible hypothesis is that prior to Columbia, there were only a few independent cratons scattered around the Earth (not necessarily a supercontinent, like Rodinia or Columbia).[15]
The Proterozoic can be roughly divided into seven biostratigraphic zones which correspond to informal time periods. The first was the Labradorian, lasting from 2.0–1.65 Ga. It was followed by the Anabarian, which lasted from 1.65–1.2 Ga and was itself followed by the Turukhanian from 1.2–1.03 Ga. The Turukhanian was succeeded by the Uchuromayan, lasting from 1.03–0.85 Ga, which was in turn succeeded by the Yuzhnouralian, lasting from 0.85–0.63 Ga. The final two zones were the Amadeusian, spanning the first half of the Ediacaran from 0.63–0.55 Ga, and the Belomorian, spanning from 0.55–0.542 Ga.[22]
By the late Palaeoproterozoic, eukaryotic organisms had become moderately biodiverse.[24] The blossoming of eukaryotes such asacritarchs did not preclude the expansion of cyanobacteria – in fact,stromatolites reached their greatest abundance and diversity during the Proterozoic, peaking roughly 1.2 Ga.[10]: 321–323
TheViridiplantae evolved sometime in the Palaeoproterozoic or Mesoproterozoic, according to molecular data.[26]
Eukaryote fossils from before the Cryogenian are sparse, and there seems to be low and relatively constant rates of species appearance, change, and extinction. This contrasts with the Ediacaran and early Cambrian periods, in which the quantity and variety of speciations, changes, and extinctions exploded.[27]
Classically, the boundary between the Proterozoic and thePhanerozoic eons was set at the base of the CambrianPeriod when the first fossils of animals, includingtrilobites andarcheocyathids, as well as the animal-likeCaveasphaera, appeared. In the second half of the 20th century, a number of fossil forms have been found in Proterozoic rocks, particularly in ones from the Ediacaran, proving that multicellular life had already become widespread tens of millions of years before theCambrian Explosion in what is known as theAvalon Explosion.[28] Nonetheless, the upper boundary of the Proterozoic has remained fixed at the base of theCambrian, which is currently placed at 538.8 Ma.
^Och, Lawrence M.; Shields-Zhou, Graham A. (January 2012). "The Neoproterozoic oxygenation event: Environmental perturbations and biogeochemical cycling".Earth-Science Reviews.110 (1–4):26–57.Bibcode:2012ESRv..110...26O.doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.09.004.
^Fan, Haifeng; Zhu, Xiangkun; Wen, Hanjie; Yan, Bin; Li, Jin; Feng, Lianjun (September 2014). "Oxygenation of Ediacaran Ocean recorded by iron isotopes".Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.140:80–94.Bibcode:2014GeCoA.140...80F.doi:10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.029.
^abcdeKearey, P.; Klepeis, K.; Vine, F. (2008).Precambrian Tectonics and the Supercontinent Cycle. Global Tectonics (Third ed.). pp. 361–377.
^Rino, Shuji; Komiya, Tsuyoshi; Windley, Brian F.; Katayama, Ikuo; Motoki, Akihisa; Hirata, Takafumi (August 2004). "Major episodic increases of continental crustal growth determined from zircon ages of river sands; implications for mantle overturns in the Early Precambrian".Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors.146 (1–2):369–394.Bibcode:2004PEPI..146..369R.doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2003.09.024.S2CID140166194.
^Huntly, C. (2002).The Mozambique Belt, Eastern Africa: Tectonic evolution of the Mozambique Ocean and Gondwana amalgamation.The Geological Society of America.
^Miao, Lanyun; Moczydłowska, Małgorzata; Zhu, Shixing; Zhu, Maoyan (February 2019). "New record of organic-walled, morphologically distinct microfossils from the late Paleoproterozoic Changcheng Group in the Yanshan Range, North China".Precambrian Research.321:172–198.Bibcode:2019PreR..321..172M.doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2018.11.019.
^Tang, Qing; Zheng, Wentao; Zhang, Shuhan; Fan, Junxuan; et al. (20 December 2024). "Quantifying the global biodiversity of Proterozoic eukaryotes".Science.386 (6728).doi:10.1126/science.adm9137.ISSN0036-8075.
![Pannotia, 545 Ma (disputed[clarification needed]), centered on South Pole](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aPannotia.svg)
.jpg)
