Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Protein

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Biomolecule consisting of chains of amino acid residues
This article is about a class of molecules. For protein as a nutrient, seeProtein (nutrient). For other uses, seeProtein (disambiguation).

A representation of the 3D structure of the proteinmyoglobin showing turquoiseα-helices. This protein was the first to have its structure solved byX-ray crystallography. Toward the right-center among the coils, aprosthetic group called aheme group (shown in gray) with a bound oxygen molecule (red).

Proteins are largebiomolecules andmacromolecules that comprise one or more long chains ofamino acidresidues. Proteins perform a vast array of functions within organisms, includingcatalysing metabolic reactions,DNA replication,responding to stimuli, providingstructure to cells andorganisms, andtransporting molecules from one location to another. Proteins differ from one another primarily in their sequence of amino acids, which is dictated by thenucleotide sequence of theirgenes, and which usually results inprotein folding into a specific3D structure that determines its activity.

A linear chain of amino acid residues is called apolypeptide. A protein contains at least one long polypeptide. Short polypeptides, containing less than 20–30 residues, are rarely considered to be proteins and are commonly calledpeptides. The individual amino acid residues are bonded together bypeptide bonds and adjacent amino acid residues. Thesequence of amino acid residues in a protein is defined by thesequence of a gene, which is encoded in thegenetic code. In general, the genetic code specifies 20 standard amino acids; but in certain organisms the genetic code can includeselenocysteine and—in certainarchaeapyrrolysine. Shortly after or even during synthesis, the residues in a protein are often chemically modified bypost-translational modification, which alters the physical and chemical properties, folding, stability, activity, and ultimately, the function of the proteins. Some proteins have non-peptide groups attached, which can be calledprosthetic groups orcofactors. Proteins can work together to achieve a particular function, and they often associate to form stableprotein complexes.

Once formed, proteins only exist for a certain period and are thendegraded and recycled by the cell's machinery through the process ofprotein turnover. A protein's lifespan is measured in terms of itshalf-life and covers a wide range. They can exist for minutes or years with an average lifespan of 1–2 days in mammalian cells. Abnormal or misfolded proteins are degraded more rapidly either due to being targeted for destruction or due to being unstable.

Like other biological macromolecules such aspolysaccharides andnucleic acids, proteins are essential parts of organisms and participate in virtually every process withincells. Many proteins areenzymes thatcatalyse biochemical reactions and are vital tometabolism. Some proteins have structural or mechanical functions, such asactin andmyosin in muscle, and thecytoskeleton's scaffolding proteins that maintain cell shape. Other proteins are important in cell signaling,immune responses,cell adhesion, and thecell cycle. In animals, proteins are needed in thediet to provide theessential amino acids that cannot besynthesized.Digestion breaks the proteins down for metabolic use.

History and etymology

Further information:History of molecular biology

Discovery and early studies

Proteins have been studied and recognized since the 1700s byAntoine Fourcroy and others,[1][2] who often collectively called them "albumins", or "albuminous materials" (Eiweisskörper, in German).[2]Gluten, for example, was first separated from wheat in published research around 1747, and later determined to exist in many plants.[1] In 1789, Antoine Fourcroy recognized three distinct varieties of animal proteins:albumin,fibrin, andgelatin.[3] Vegetable (plant) proteins studied in the late 1700s and early 1800s includedgluten,plant albumin,gliadin, andlegumin.[1]

Proteins were first described by the Dutch chemistGerardus Johannes Mulder and named by the Swedish chemistJöns Jacob Berzelius in 1838.[4][5] Mulder carried outelemental analysis of common proteins and found that nearly all proteins had the sameempirical formula, C400H620N100O120P1S1.[6] He came to the erroneous conclusion that they might be composed of a single type of (very large) molecule. The term "protein" to describe these molecules was proposed by Mulder's associate Berzelius; protein is derived from theGreek wordπρώτειος (proteios), meaning "primary",[7] "in the lead", or "standing in front",[2] +-in. Mulder went on to identify the products of protein degradation such as theamino acidleucine for which he found a (nearly correct) molecular weight of 131Da.[6]

Early nutritional scientists such as the GermanCarl von Voit believed that protein was the most important nutrient for maintaining the structure of the body, because it was generally believed that "flesh makes flesh."[8] Around 1862,Karl Heinrich Ritthausen isolated the amino acidglutamic acid.[9]Thomas Burr Osborne compiled a detailed review of the vegetable proteins at theConnecticut Agricultural Experiment Station. Osborne, alongsideLafayette Mendel, established severalnutritionally essential amino acids in feeding experiments with laboratory rats.[10] Diets lacking an essential amino acid stunts the rats' growth, consistent withLiebig's law of the minimum.[11] The final essential amino acid to be discovered,threonine, was identified byWilliam Cumming Rose.[12]

The difficulty in purifying proteins impeded work by early protein biochemists. Proteins could be obtained in large quantities from blood, egg whites, andkeratin, but individual proteins were unavailable. In the 1950s, theArmour Hot Dog Company purified 1 kg of bovine pancreaticribonuclease A and made it freely available to scientists. This gesture helped ribonuclease A become a major target for biochemical study for the following decades.[6]

Polypeptides

polypeptide

The understanding of proteins aspolypeptides, or chains of amino acids, came through the work ofFranz Hofmeister andHermann Emil Fischer in 1902.[13][14] The central role of proteins asenzymes in living organisms that catalyzed reactions was not fully appreciated until 1926, whenJames B. Sumner showed that the enzymeurease was in fact a protein.[15]

Linus Pauling is credited with the successful prediction of regular proteinsecondary structures based onhydrogen bonding, an idea first put forth byWilliam Astbury in 1933.[16] Later work byWalter Kauzmann ondenaturation,[17][18] based partly on previous studies byKaj Linderstrøm-Lang,[19] contributed an understanding ofprotein folding and structure mediated byhydrophobic interactions.[20]

The first protein to have its amino acid chainsequenced wasinsulin, byFrederick Sanger, in 1949. Sanger correctly determined the amino acid sequence of insulin, thus conclusively demonstrating that proteins consisted of linear polymers of amino acids rather than branched chains,colloids, orcyclols.[21] He won the Nobel Prize for this achievement in 1958.[22]Christian Anfinsen's studies of theoxidative folding process of ribonuclease A, for which he won the nobel prize in 1972, solidified thethermodynamic hypothesis of protein folding, according to which the folded form of a protein represents itsfree energy minimum.[23][24]

Structure

John Kendrew with model of myoglobin in progress

With the development ofX-ray crystallography, it became possible to determine protein structures as well as their sequences.[25] The firstprotein structures to be solved werehemoglobin byMax Perutz andmyoglobin byJohn Kendrew, in 1958.[26][27] The use of computers and increasing computing power has supported the sequencing of complex proteins. In 1999,Roger Kornberg sequenced the highly complex structure ofRNA polymerase using high intensity X-rays fromsynchrotrons.[25]

Since then,cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) of largemacromolecular assemblies[28] has been developed. Cryo-EM uses protein samples that are frozen rather than crystals, andbeams of electrons rather than X-rays. It causes less damage to the sample, allowing scientists to obtain more information and analyze larger structures.[25] Computationalprotein structure prediction of small proteinstructural domains[29] has helped researchers to approach atomic-level resolution of protein structures.As of April 2024[update], theProtein Data Bank contains 181,018 X-ray, 19,809EM and 12,697NMR protein structures.[30]

Classification

Main articles:Protein family,Gene Ontology, andEnzyme Commission number

Proteins are primarily classified by sequence and structure, although other classifications are commonly used. Especially for enzymes the EC number system provides a functional classification scheme.[31] Similarly,gene ontology classifies both genes and proteins by their biological and biochemical function, and by their intracellular location.[32]

Sequence similarity is used to classify proteins both in terms of evolutionary and functional similarity. This may use either whole proteins orprotein domains, especially inmulti-domain proteins. Protein domains allow protein classification by a combination of sequence, structure and function, and they can be combined in many ways. In an early study of 170,000 proteins, about two-thirds were assigned at least one domain, with larger proteins containing more domains (e.g. proteins larger than 600amino acids having an average of more than 5 domains).[33]

Biochemistry

Chemical structure of the peptide bond (bottom) and the three-dimensional structure of a peptide bond between analanine and an adjacent amino acid (top/inset). The bond itself is made of theCHON elements.
Resonance structures of thepeptide bond that links individual amino acids to form a proteinpolymer
Main articles:Biochemistry,Amino acid, andPeptide bond

Most proteins consist of linearpolymers built from series of up to 20L-α-amino acids. Allproteinogenic amino acids have a common structure where anα-carbon isbonded to anamino group, acarboxyl group, and a variableside chain. Onlyproline differs from this basic structure as its side chain is cyclical, bonding to the amino group, limiting protein chain flexibility.[34] The side chains of thestandard amino acids have a variety of chemical structures and properties, and it is the combined effect of all amino acids that determines its three-dimensional structure and chemical reactivity.[35]

The amino acids in a polypeptide chain are linked bypeptide bonds between amino and carboxyl group. An individual amino acid in a chain is called aresidue, and the linked series of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms are known as themain chain orprotein backbone.[36]: 19  The peptide bond has tworesonance forms that confer somedouble-bond character to the backbone. The alpha carbons are roughlycoplanar with the nitrogen and the carbonyl (C=O) group. The other twodihedral angles in the peptide bond determine the local shape assumed by the protein backbone. One conseqence of the N-C(O) double bond character is that proteins are somewhat rigid.[36]: 31  A polypeptide chain ends with a free amino group, known as theN-terminus oramino terminus, and a free carboxyl group, known as theC-terminus orcarboxy terminus.[37] By convention, peptide sequences are written N-terminus to C-terminus, correlating with the order in which proteins aresynthesized by ribosomes.[37][38]

The wordsprotein,polypeptide, andpeptide are a little ambiguous and can overlap in meaning.Protein is generally used to refer to the complete biological molecule in a stableconformation, whereaspeptide is generally reserved for a short amino acid oligomers often lacking a stable 3D structure. But the boundary between the two is not well defined and usually lies near 20–30 residues.[39]

Proteins can interact with many types of molecules and ions, includingwith other proteins,with lipids,with carbohydrates, andwith DNA.[40][41][42]

Abundance in cells

A typicalbacterial cell, e.g.E. coli andStaphylococcus aureus, is estimated to contain about 2 million proteins. Smaller bacteria, such asMycoplasma orspirochetes contain fewer molecules, on the order of 50,000 to 1 million. By contrast,eukaryotic cells are larger and thus contain much more protein. For instance,yeast cells have been estimated to contain about 50 million proteins andhuman cells on the order of 1 to 3 billion.[43] The concentration of individual protein copies ranges from a few molecules per cell up to 20 million.[44] Not all genes coding proteins are expressed in most cells and their number depends on, for example, cell type and external stimuli. For instance, of the 20,000 or so proteins encoded by the human genome, only 6,000 are detected inlymphoblastoid cells.[45] The most abundant protein in nature is thought to beRuBisCO, an enzyme that catalyzes the incorporation ofcarbon dioxide into organic matter inphotosynthesis. Plants can consist of as much as 1% by weight of this enzyme,[46]

Synthesis

Biosynthesis

A ribosome produces a protein using mRNA as template
TheDNA sequence of a geneencodes the amino acid sequence of a protein
Main article:Protein biosynthesis

Proteins are assembled from amino acids using information encoded in genes. Each protein has its own unique amino acid sequence that is specified by thenucleotide sequence of the gene encoding this protein. Thegenetic code is a set of three-nucleotide sets calledcodons and each three-nucleotide combination designates an amino acid, for example AUG (adenineuracilguanine) is the code formethionine. BecauseDNA contains four nucleotides, the total number of possible codons is 64; hence, there is some redundancy in the genetic code, with some amino acids specified by more than one codon.[42]: 1002–42  Genes encoded in DNA are firsttranscribed into pre-messenger RNA (mRNA) by proteins such asRNA polymerase. Most organisms then process the pre-mRNA (aprimary transcript) using various forms ofpost-transcriptional modification to form the mature mRNA, which is then used as a template for protein synthesis by theribosome. Inprokaryotes the mRNA may either be used as soon as it is produced, or be bound by a ribosome after having moved away from thenucleoid. In contrast,eukaryotes make mRNA in thecell nucleus and thentranslocate it across thenuclear membrane into thecytoplasm, whereprotein synthesis then takes place. The rate of protein synthesis is higher in prokaryotes than eukaryotes and can reach up to 20 amino acids per second.[47]

The process of synthesizing a protein from an mRNA template is known astranslation. The mRNA is loaded onto the ribosome and is read three nucleotides at a time by matching each codon to itsbase pairinganticodon located on atransfer RNA molecule, which carries the amino acid corresponding to the codon it recognizes. The enzymeaminoacyl tRNA synthetase "charges" the tRNA molecules with the correct amino acids. The growing polypeptide is often termed thenascent chain. Proteins are always biosynthesized fromN-terminus toC-terminus.[42]: 1002–42 

The size of a synthesized protein can be measured by the number of amino acids it contains and by its totalmolecular mass, which is normally reported in units ofdaltons (synonymous withatomic mass units), or the derivative unit kilodalton (kDa). The average size of a protein increases from Archaea to Bacteria to Eukaryote (283, 311, 438 residues and 31, 34, 49 kDa respectively) due to a bigger number ofprotein domains constituting proteins in higher organisms.[48] For instance,yeast proteins are on average 466 amino acids long and 53 kDa in mass.[39] The largest known proteins are thetitins, a component of themusclesarcomere, with a molecular mass of almost 3,000 kDa and a total length of almost 27,000 amino acids.[49]

Chemical synthesis

Main article:Peptide synthesis
Peptide Synthesis

Short proteins can be synthesized chemically by a family ofpeptide synthesis methods. These rely onorganic synthesis techniques such aschemical ligation to produce peptides in high yield.[50] Chemical synthesis allows for the introduction of non-natural amino acids into polypeptide chains, such as attachment offluorescent probes to amino acid side chains.[51] These methods are useful in laboratorybiochemistry andcell biology, though generally not for commercial applications. Chemical synthesis is inefficient for polypeptides longer than about 300 amino acids, and the synthesized proteins may not readily assume their nativetertiary structure. Most chemical synthesis methods proceed from C-terminus to N-terminus, opposite the biological reaction.[52]

Structure

The crystal structure of thechaperonin, a huge protein complex. A single protein subunit is highlighted. Chaperonins assist protein folding.
Three possible representations of the three-dimensional structure of the proteintriose phosphate isomerase.Left: All-atom representation colored by atom type.Middle: Simplified representation illustrating the backbone conformation, colored by secondary structure.Right: Solvent-accessible surface representation colored by residue type (acidic residues red, basic residues blue, polar residues green, nonpolar residues white).
Main article:Protein structure
Further information:Protein structure prediction

Most proteinsfold into unique 3D structures. The shape into which a protein naturally folds is known as itsnative conformation.[36]: 36  Although many proteins can fold unassisted, simply through the chemical properties of their amino acids, others require the aid of molecularchaperones to fold into their native states.[36]: 37  Biochemists often refer to four distinct aspects of a protein's structure:[36]: 30–34 

Proteins are not entirely rigid molecules. In addition to these levels of structure, proteins may shift between several related structures while they perform their functions. In the context of these functional rearrangements, these tertiary or quaternary structures are usually referred to as "conformations", and transitions between them are calledconformational changes. Such changes are often induced by the binding of asubstrate molecule to an enzyme'sactive site, or the physical region of the protein that participates in chemical catalysis. In solution, protein structures vary because of thermal vibration and collisions with other molecules.[42]: 368–75 

Molecular surface of several proteins showing their comparative sizes. From left to right are:immunoglobulin G (IgG, anantibody),hemoglobin,insulin (a hormone),adenylate kinase (an enzyme), andglutamine synthetase (an enzyme).

Proteins can be informally divided into three main classes, which correlate with typical tertiary structures:globular proteins,fibrous proteins, andmembrane proteins. Almost all globular proteins aresoluble and many are enzymes. Fibrous proteins are often structural, such ascollagen, the major component of connective tissue, orkeratin, the protein component of hair and nails. Membrane proteins often serve asreceptors or provide channels for polar or charged molecules to pass through thecell membrane.[42]: 165–85 

A special case of intramolecular hydrogen bonds within proteins, poorly shielded from water attack and hence promoting their owndehydration, are calleddehydrons.[53]

Protein domains

Main article:Protein domain

Many proteins are composed of severalprotein domains, i.e. segments of a protein that fold into distinct structural units.[54]: 134  Domains usually have specific functions, such asenzymatic activities (e.g.kinase) or they serve as binding modules.[54]: 155–156 

Protein domains vs. motifs. Protein domains (such as theEVH1 domain) are functional units within proteins that fold into defined 3D structures. Motifs are usually short sequences with specific functions but without a stable 3D structure. Many motifs are binding sites for other proteins (such as the red and green bars shown here in the context of aVASP protein).[55]

Sequence motif

Short amino acid sequences within proteins often act as recognition sites for other proteins.[56] For instance,SH3 domains typically bind to short PxxP motifs (i.e. 2prolines [P], separated by two unspecifiedamino acids [x], although the surrounding amino acids may determine the exact binding specificity). Many such motifs has been collected in theEukaryotic Linear Motif (ELM) database.[57]

Cellular functions

Proteins are the chief actors within the cell, said to be carrying out the duties specified by the information encoded in genes.[39] With the exception of certain types ofRNA, most other biological molecules are relatively inert elements upon which proteins act. Proteins make up half the dry weight of anEscherichia coli cell, whereas other macromolecules such as DNA and RNA make up only 3% and 20%, respectively.[58] The set of proteins expressed in a particular cell or cell type is known as itsproteome.[54]: 120 

The enzymehexokinase is shown as a conventional ball-and-stick molecular model. To scale in the top right-hand corner are two of its substrates,ATP andglucose.

The chief characteristic of proteins that allows their diverse set of functions is their ability to bind other molecules specifically and tightly. The region of the protein responsible for binding another molecule is known as thebinding site and is often a depression or "pocket" on the molecular surface. This binding ability is mediated by the tertiary structure of the protein, which defines the binding site pocket, and by the chemical properties of the surrounding amino acids' side chains. Protein binding can be extraordinarily tight and specific; for example, theribonuclease inhibitor protein binds to humanangiogenin with a sub-femtomolardissociation constant (<10−15 M) but does not bind at all to its amphibian homologonconase (> 1 M). Extremely minor chemical changes such as the addition of a single methyl group to a binding partner can sometimes suffice to nearly eliminate binding; for example, theaminoacyl tRNA synthetase specific to the amino acidvaline discriminates against the very similar side chain of the amino acidisoleucine.[59]

Proteins can bind to other proteins as well as tosmall-molecule substrates. When proteins bind specifically to other copies of the same molecule, they canoligomerize to form fibrils; this process occurs often in structural proteins that consist of globular monomers that self-associate to form rigid fibers.Protein–protein interactions regulate enzymatic activity, control progression through thecell cycle, and allow the assembly of largeprotein complexes that carry out many closely related reactions with a common biological function. Proteins can bind to, or be integrated into, cell membranes. The ability of binding partners to induce conformational changes in proteins allows the construction of enormously complexsignaling networks.[42]: 830–49 As interactions between proteins are reversible and depend heavily on the availability of different groups of partner proteins to form aggregates that are capable to carry out discrete sets of function, study of the interactions between specific proteins is a key to understand important aspects of cellular function, and ultimately the properties that distinguish particular cell types.[60][61]

Enzymes

Main article:Enzyme

The best-known role of proteins in the cell is asenzymes, whichcatalyse chemical reactions. Enzymes are usually highly specific and accelerate only one or a few chemical reactions. Enzymes carry out most of the reactions involved inmetabolism, as well as manipulating DNA in processes such asDNA replication,DNA repair, andtranscription. Some enzymes act on other proteins to add or remove chemical groups in a process known as posttranslational modification. About 4,000 reactions are known to be catalysed by enzymes.[62] The rate acceleration conferred by enzymatic catalysis is often enormous—as much as 1017-fold increase in rate over the uncatalysed reaction in the case oforotate decarboxylase (78 million years without the enzyme, 18 milliseconds with the enzyme).[63]

The molecules bound and acted upon by enzymes are calledsubstrates. Although enzymes can consist of hundreds of amino acids, it is usually only a small fraction of the residues that come in contact with the substrate, and an even smaller fraction—three to four residues on average—that are directly involved in catalysis.[64] The region of the enzyme that binds the substrate and contains the catalytic residues is known as theactive site.[54]: 389 

Dirigent proteins are members of a class of proteins that dictate thestereochemistry of a compound synthesized by other enzymes.[65]

Cell signaling and ligand binding

See also:Glycan-protein interactions
Ribbon diagram of a mouse antibody againstcholera that binds acarbohydrate antigen

Many proteins are involved in the process ofcell signaling andsignal transduction. Some proteins, such asinsulin, are extracellular proteins that transmit a signal from the cell in which they were synthesized to other cells in distanttissues. Others aremembrane proteins that act asreceptors whose main function is to bind a signaling molecule and induce a biochemical response in the cell. Many receptors have a binding site exposed on the cell surface and an effector domain within the cell, which may have enzymatic activity or may undergo aconformational change detected by other proteins within the cell.[41]: 251–81 

Antibodies are protein components of anadaptive immune system whose main function is to bindantigens, or foreign substances in the body, and target them for destruction. Antibodies can besecreted into the extracellular environment or anchored in the membranes of specializedB cells known asplasma cells. Whereas enzymes are limited in their binding affinity for their substrates by the necessity of conducting their reaction, antibodies have no such constraints. An antibody's binding affinity to its target is extraordinarily high.[42]: 275–50 

Many ligand transport proteins bind particularsmall biomolecules and transport them to other locations in the body of a multicellular organism. These proteins must have a high binding affinity when theirligand is present in high concentrations, and release the ligand when it is present at low concentrations in the target tissues. The canonical example of a ligand-binding protein ishaemoglobin, which transportsoxygen from thelungs to other organs and tissues in allvertebrates and has close homologs in every biologicalkingdom.[42]: 222–29 Lectins aresugar-binding proteins which are highly specific for their sugar moieties.Lectins typically play a role in biologicalrecognition phenomena involving cells and proteins.[66]Receptors andhormones are highly specific binding proteins.

Transmembrane proteins can serve as ligand transport proteins that alter thepermeability of the cell membrane tosmall molecules and ions. The membrane alone has ahydrophobic core through whichpolar or charged molecules cannotdiffuse. Membrane proteins contain internal channels that allow such molecules to enter and exit the cell. Manyion channel proteins are specialized to select for only a particular ion; for example,potassium andsodium channels often discriminate for only one of the two ions.[41]: 232–34 

Structural proteins

Protein Structure

Structural proteins confer stiffness and rigidity to otherwise-fluid biological components. Most structural proteins arefibrous proteins; for example,collagen andelastin are critical components ofconnective tissue such ascartilage, andkeratin is found in hard or filamentous structures such ashair,nails,feathers,hooves, and someanimal shells.[42]: 178–81  Someglobular proteins can play structural functions, for example,actin andtubulin are globular and soluble as monomers, butpolymerize to form long, stiff fibers that make up thecytoskeleton, which allows the cell to maintain its shape and size.[54]: 490 

Other proteins that serve structural functions aremotor proteins such asmyosin,kinesin, anddynein, which are capable of generating mechanical forces. These proteins are crucial for cellularmotility of single celled organisms and thesperm of many multicellular organisms which reproducesexually. They generate the forces exerted by contractingmuscles[42]: 258–64, 272  and play essential roles in intracellular transport.[54]: 481, 490 

Methods of study

Main article:Protein methods

Methods commonly used to study protein structure and function includeimmunohistochemistry,site-directed mutagenesis,X-ray crystallography,nuclear magnetic resonance andmass spectrometry. The activities and structures of proteins may be examinedin vitro,in vivo, andin silico.In vitro studies of purified proteins in controlled environments are useful for learning how a protein carries out its function:[67] for example,enzyme kinetics studies explore thechemical mechanism of an enzyme's catalytic activity and its relative affinity for various possible substrate molecules.[68] By contrast,in vivo experiments can provide information about the physiological role of a protein in the context of acell or even a wholeorganism, and can often provide more information about protein behavior in different contexts.[69]In silico studies use computational methods to study proteins.[70]

Protein purification

Main article:Protein purification

Proteins may bepurified from other cellular components using a variety of techniques such asultracentrifugation,precipitation,electrophoresis, andchromatography;[36]: 21–24  the advent ofgenetic engineering has made possible a number of methods to facilitate purification.[71]

To performin vitro analysis, a protein must be purified away from other cellular components. This process usually begins withcell lysis, in which a cell's membrane is disrupted and its internal contents released into a solution known as acrude lysate. The resulting mixture can be purified usingultracentrifugation, which fractionates the various cellular components into fractions containing soluble proteins; membranelipids and proteins; cellularorganelles, andnucleic acids.Precipitation by a method known assalting out can concentrate the proteins from this lysate. Various types ofchromatography are then used to isolate the protein or proteins of interest based on properties such as molecular weight, net charge and binding affinity.[36]: 21–24  The level of purification can be monitored using various types ofgel electrophoresis if the desired protein's molecular weight andisoelectric point are known, byspectroscopy if the protein has distinguishable spectroscopic features, or byenzyme assays if the protein has enzymatic activity. Additionally, proteins can be isolated according to their charge usingelectrofocusing.[72]

For natural proteins, a series of purification steps may be necessary to obtain protein sufficiently pure for laboratory applications. To simplify this process,genetic engineering is often used to add chemical features to proteins that make them easier to purify without affecting their structure or activity. Here, a "tag" consisting of a specific amino acid sequence, often a series ofhistidine residues (a "His-tag"), is attached to one terminus of the protein. As a result, when the lysate is passed over a chromatography column containingnickel, the histidine residues ligate the nickel and attach to the column while the untagged components of the lysate pass unimpeded. A number of tags have been developed to help researchers purify specific proteins from complex mixtures.[71]

Cellular localization

Proteins in variouscellular compartments and structures tagged withgreen fluorescent protein (here, white)

The study of proteinsin vivo is often concerned with the synthesis and localization of the protein within the cell. Although many intracellular proteins are synthesized in thecytoplasm and membrane-bound or secreted proteins in theendoplasmic reticulum, the specifics of how proteins aretargeted to specific organelles or cellular structures is often unclear. A useful technique for assessing cellular localization uses genetic engineering to express in a cell afusion protein orchimera consisting of the natural protein of interest linked to a "reporter" such asgreen fluorescent protein (GFP).[73] The fused protein's position within the cell can then be cleanly and efficiently visualized usingmicroscopy.[74]

Other methods for elucidating the cellular location of proteins requires the use of known compartmental markers for regions such as the ER, the Golgi, lysosomes or vacuoles, mitochondria, chloroplasts, plasma membrane, etc. With the use of fluorescently tagged versions of these markers or of antibodies to known markers, it becomes much simpler to identify the localization of a protein of interest. For example,indirect immunofluorescence will allow for fluorescence colocalization and demonstration of location. Fluorescent dyes are used to label cellular compartments for a similar purpose.[75]

Other possibilities exist, as well. For example,immunohistochemistry usually uses an antibody to one or more proteins of interest that are conjugated to enzymes yielding either luminescent or chromogenic signals that can be compared between samples, allowing for localization information.[76] Another applicable technique is cofractionation in sucrose (or other material) gradients usingisopycnic centrifugation.[77] While this technique does not prove colocalization of a compartment of known density and the protein of interest, it indicates an increased likelihood.[77]

Finally, the gold-standard method of cellular localization isimmunoelectron microscopy. This technique uses an antibody to the protein of interest, along with classical electron microscopy techniques. The sample is prepared for normal electron microscopic examination, and then treated with an antibody to the protein of interest that is conjugated to an extremely electro-dense material, usually gold. This allows for the localization of both ultrastructural details as well as the protein of interest.[78]

Through another genetic engineering application known assite-directed mutagenesis, researchers can alter the protein sequence and hence its structure, cellular localization, and susceptibility to regulation. This technique even allows the incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins, using modified tRNAs,[79] and may allow the rationaldesign of new proteins with novel properties.[80]

Proteomics

Main article:Proteomics

The total complement of proteins present at a time in a cell or cell type is known as itsproteome, and the study of such large-scale data sets defines the field ofproteomics, named by analogy to the related field ofgenomics. Key experimental techniques in proteomics include2D electrophoresis,[81] which allows the separation of many proteins,mass spectrometry,[82] which allows rapid high-throughput identification of proteins and sequencing of peptides (most often afterin-gel digestion),protein microarrays, which allow the detection of the relative levels of the various proteins present in a cell, andtwo-hybrid screening, which allows the systematic exploration ofprotein–protein interactions.[83] The total complement of biologically possible such interactions is known as theinteractome.[84] A systematic attempt to determine the structures of proteins representing every possible fold is known asstructural genomics.[85]

Structure determination

Discovering the tertiary structure of a protein, or the quaternary structure of its complexes, can provide important clues about how the protein performs its function and how it can be affected, i.e. indrug design. As proteins aretoo small to be seen under alight microscope, other methods have to be employed to determine their structure. Common experimental methods includeX-ray crystallography andNMR spectroscopy, both of which can produce structural information atatomic resolution. However, NMR experiments are able to provide information from which a subset of distances between pairs of atoms can be estimated, and the final possible conformations for a protein are determined by solving adistance geometry problem.Dual polarisation interferometry is a quantitative analytical method for measuring the overallprotein conformation andconformational changes due to interactions or other stimulus.Circular dichroism is another laboratory technique for determining internal β-sheet / α-helical composition of proteins.Cryoelectron microscopy is used to produce lower-resolution structural information about very large protein complexes, including assembledviruses;[41]: 340–41  a variant known aselectron crystallography can produce high-resolution information in some cases, especially for two-dimensional crystals of membrane proteins.[86] Solved structures are usually deposited in theProtein Data Bank (PDB), a freely available resource from which structural data about thousands of proteins can be obtained in the form ofCartesian coordinates for each atom in the protein.[87]

Many more gene sequences are known than protein structures. Further, the set of solved structures is biased toward proteins that can be easily subjected to the conditions required inX-ray crystallography, one of the major structure determination methods. In particular, globular proteins are comparatively easy tocrystallize in preparation for X-ray crystallography. Membrane proteins and large protein complexes, by contrast, are difficult to crystallize and are underrepresented in the PDB.[88]Structural genomics initiatives have attempted to remedy these deficiencies by systematically solving representative structures of major fold classes.Protein structure prediction methods attempt to provide a means of generating a plausible structure for proteins whose structures have not been experimentally determined.[89]

Structure prediction

Constituent amino-acids can be analyzed to predict secondary, tertiary and quaternary protein structure, in this case hemoglobin containingheme units
Main articles:Protein structure prediction andList of protein structure prediction software

Complementary to the field of structural genomics,protein structure prediction develops efficientmathematical models of proteins to computationally predict the molecular formations in theory, instead of detecting structures with laboratory observation.[90] The most successful type of structure prediction, known ashomology modeling, relies on the existence of a "template" structure with sequence similarity to the protein being modeled; structural genomics' goal is to provide sufficient representation in solved structures to model most of those that remain.[91] Although producing accurate models remains a challenge when only distantly related template structures are available, it has been suggested thatsequence alignment is the bottleneck in this process, as quite accurate models can be produced if a "perfect" sequence alignment is known.[92] Many structure prediction methods have served to inform the emerging field ofprotein engineering, in which novel protein folds have already been designed.[93] Many proteins (in eukaryotes ~33%) contain large unstructured but biologically functional segments and can be classified asintrinsically disordered proteins. Predicting and analysing protein disorder is an important part of protein structure characterisation.[94]

In silico simulation of dynamical processes

A more complex computational problem is the prediction of intermolecular interactions, such as inmolecular docking,[95]protein folding,protein–protein interaction and chemical reactivity. Mathematical models to simulate these dynamical processes involvemolecular mechanics, in particular,molecular dynamics. In this regard,in silico simulations discovered the folding of small α-helicalprotein domains such as thevillin headpiece,[96] theHIV accessory protein[97] and hybrid methods combining standard molecular dynamics withquantum mechanical mathematics have explored the electronic states ofrhodopsins.[98]

Beyond classical molecular dynamics,quantum dynamics methods allow the simulation of proteins in atomistic detail with an accurate description of quantum mechanical effects. Examples include the multi-layermulti-configuration time-dependent Hartree method and thehierarchical equations of motion approach, which have been applied to plant cryptochromes[99] and bacteria light-harvesting complexes,[100] respectively. Both quantum and classical mechanical simulations of biological-scale systems are extremely computationally demanding, sodistributed computing initiatives such as theFolding@home project facilitate themolecular modeling by exploiting advances inGPU parallel processing andMonte Carlo techniques.[101][102]

Chemical analysis

The total nitrogen content of organic matter is mainly formed by the amino groups in proteins. The Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) is a measure of nitrogen widely used in the analysis of (waste) water, soil, food, feed and organic matter in general. As the name suggests, theKjeldahl method is applied. More sensitive methods are available.[103][104]

Digestion

Main article:Proteolysis
Hydrolysis of protein. X = HCl and heat for industrial proteolysis. X = protease for biological proteolysis

In the absence of catalysts, proteins are slow tohydrolyze.[105] The breakdown of proteins to small peptides and amino acids (proteolysis) is a step indigestion; these breakdown products are then absorbed in the small intestine.[106] The hydrolysis of proteins relies on enzymes calledproteases or peptidases. Proteases, which are themselves proteins, come in several types according to the particularpeptide bonds that they cleave as well as their tendency to cleave peptide bonds at the terminus of a protein (exopeptidases) vs peptide bonds at the interior of the protein (endopeptidases).[107]Pepsin is an endopeptidase in the stomach. Subsequent to the stomach, the pancreas secretes other proteases to complete the hydrolysis, these includetrypsin andchymotrypsin.[108]

Protein hydrolysis is employed commercially as a means of producing amino acids from bulk sources of protein, such as blood meal, feathers, keratin. Such materials are treated with hothydrochloric acid, which effects the hydrolysis of the peptide bonds.[109]

Mechanical properties

Themechanical properties of proteins are highly diverse and are often central to their biological function, as in the case of proteins likekeratin andcollagen.[110] For instance, the ability ofmuscle tissue to continually expand and contract is directly tied to the elastic properties of their underlying protein makeup.[111][112] Beyond fibrous proteins, the conformational dynamics ofenzymes[113] and the structure ofbiological membranes, among other biological functions, are governed by the mechanical properties of the proteins. Outside of their biological context, the unique mechanical properties of many proteins, along with their relative sustainability when compared tosynthetic polymers, have made them desirable targets for next-generation materials design.[114][115]

Young's modulus,E, is calculated as the axial stress σ over the resulting strain ε. It is a measure of the relativestiffness of a material. In the context of proteins, this stiffness often directly correlates to biological function. For example,collagen, found inconnective tissue,bones, andcartilage, andkeratin, found in nails, claws, and hair, have observed stiffnesses that are several orders of magnitude higher than that ofelastin,[116] which is though to give elasticity to structures such asblood vessels,pulmonary tissue, andbladder tissue, among others.[117][118] In comparison to this,globular proteins, such asBovine Serum Albumin, which float relatively freely in thecytosol and often function as enzymes (and thus undergoing frequent conformational changes) have comparably much lower Young's moduli.[119][120]

The Young's modulus of a single protein can be found throughmolecular dynamics simulation. Using either atomistic force-fields, such asCHARMM orGROMOS, or coarse-grained forcefields like Martini,[121] a single protein molecule can be stretched by a uniaxial force while the resulting extension is recorded in order to calculate the strain.[122][123] Experimentally, methods such asatomic force microscopy can be used to obtain similar data.[124]

At the macroscopic level, the Young's modulus of cross-linked protein networks can be obtained through more traditionalmechanical testing. Experimentally observed values for a few proteins can be seen below.

Elasticity of Various Proteins
ProteinProtein ClassYoung's modulus
Keratin (Cross-Linked)Fibrous1.5-10 GPa[125]
Elastin (Cross-Linked)Fibrous1 MPa[116]
Fibrin (Cross-linked)Fibrous1-10 MPa[116]
Collagen (Cross-linked)Fibrous5-7.5 GPa[116][126]
Resilin (Cross-Linked)Fibrous1-2 MPa[116]
Bovine Serum Albumin (Cross-Linked)Globular2.5-15 KPa[119]
β-Barrel Outer Membrane ProteinsMembrane20-45 GPa[127]

See also

References

  1. ^abcOsborne TB (1909)."History".The Vegetable Proteins. pp. 1–6.
  2. ^abcReynolds JA, Tanford C (2003).Nature's Robots: A History of Proteins (Oxford Paperbacks). New York, New York: Oxford University Press. p. 15.ISBN 978-0-19-860694-9.
  3. ^Tanford C (2001).Nature's robots: a history of proteins. Internet Archive. Oxford; Toronto: Oxford University Press.ISBN 978-0-19-850466-5.
  4. ^Mulder GJ (1838)."Sur la composition de quelques substances animales".Bulletin des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles en Néerlande: 104.
  5. ^Hartley H (August 1951)."Origin of the word 'protein'".Nature.168 (4267): 244.Bibcode:1951Natur.168..244H.doi:10.1038/168244a0.PMID 14875059.S2CID 4271525.
  6. ^abcPerrett D (August 2007). "From 'protein' to the beginnings of clinical proteomics".Proteomics. Clinical Applications.1 (8):720–738.doi:10.1002/prca.200700525.PMID 21136729.S2CID 32843102.
  7. ^"Protein (n.)".Oxford English Dictionary. July 2023.doi:10.1093/OED/5657543824.
  8. ^Bischoff TL, Voit C (1860).Die Gesetze der Ernaehrung des Pflanzenfressers durch neue Untersuchungen festgestellt (in German). Leipzig, Heidelberg.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  9. ^Osborne TB (April 1913)."In Memoriam Heinrich Ritthausen".Biochemical Bulletin.II (7).Columbia University Biochemical Association: 338. Retrieved1 January 2016., archived at theBiodiversity Heritage Library
  10. ^Simoni RD, Hill RL, Vaughan M (2002-05-03)."Nutritional Biochemistry and the Amino Acid Composition of Proteins: the Early Years of Protein Chemistry. The Work of Thomas B. Osborne and Lafayette B. Mendel".Journal of Biological Chemistry.277 (18):14–15.doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(19)35800-4.
  11. ^Osborne TB, Mendel LB, Ferry EL, Wakeman AJ (1916)."The Amino-Acid Minimum for Maintenance and Growth, as Exemplified by Further Experiments with Lysine and Tryptophane".Journal of Biological Chemistry.25 (1):1–12.doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)87509-3.
  12. ^Simoni RD, Hill RL, Vaughan M (2002-09-13)."The Discovery of the Amino Acid Threonine: the Work of William C. Rose".Journal of Biological Chemistry.277 (37):56–58.doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(20)74369-3.
  13. ^"Hofmeister, Franz". encyclopedia.com.Archived from the original on 5 April 2017. Retrieved4 April 2017.
  14. ^Koshland DE, Haurowitz F."Protein, section: Classification of protein". britannica.com.Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved4 April 2017.
  15. ^Sumner JB (August 1926)."The Isolation and Crystallization of the Enzyme Urease".Journal of Biological Chemistry.69 (2):435–441.doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)84560-4.
  16. ^Pauling L, Corey RB (May 1951)."Atomic coordinates and structure factors for two helical configurations of polypeptide chains".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.37 (5):235–240.Bibcode:1951PNAS...37..235P.doi:10.1073/pnas.37.5.235.PMC 1063348.PMID 14834145.
  17. ^Kauzmann W (May 1956). "Structural factors in protein denaturation".Journal of Cellular Physiology. Supplement.47 (Suppl 1):113–131.doi:10.1002/jcp.1030470410.PMID 13332017.
  18. ^Kauzmann W (1959). "Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation".Advances in Protein Chemistry Volume 14. Vol. 14. pp. 1–63.doi:10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60608-7.ISBN 978-0-12-034214-3.PMID 14404936.
  19. ^Kalman SM, Linderstrøm-Lang K, Ottesen M, Richards FM (February 1955). "Degradation of ribonuclease by subtilisin".Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.16 (2):297–299.doi:10.1016/0006-3002(55)90224-9.PMID 14363272.
  20. ^Dill KA (1990)."Dominant forces in protein folding".Biochemistry.29 (31):7133–7155.doi:10.1021/bi00483a001.PMID 2207096.
  21. ^Sanger F (1949)."The terminal peptides of insulin".The Biochemical Journal.45 (5):563–574.doi:10.1042/bj0450563.PMC 1275055.PMID 15396627.
  22. ^Sanger F. (1958),Nobel lecture: The chemistry of insulin(PDF), Nobelprize.org,archived(PDF) from the original on 2013-03-19, retrieved2016-02-09
  23. ^Richards FM (1972). "The 1972 nobel prize for chemistry".Science.178 (4060):492–3.Bibcode:1972Sci...178..492R.doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.492.PMID 17754377.
  24. ^Marshall GR, Feng JA, Kuster DJ (2008)."Back to the future: Ribonuclease A".Biopolymers.90 (3):259–77.doi:10.1002/bip.20845.PMID 17868092.
  25. ^abcStoddart C (1 March 2022)."Structural biology: How proteins got their close-up".Knowable Magazine.doi:10.1146/knowable-022822-1.
  26. ^Muirhead H, Perutz MF (August 1963). ". Structure of haemoglobin. A three-dimensional Fourier synthesis of reduced human haemoglobin at 5.5 Å resolution".Nature.199 (4894):633–638.Bibcode:1963Natur.199..633M.doi:10.1038/199633a0.PMID 14074546.S2CID 4257461.
  27. ^Kendrew JC, Bodo G, Dintzis HM, Parrish RG, Wyckoff H, Phillips DC (March 1958). "A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by x-ray analysis".Nature.181 (4610):662–666.Bibcode:1958Natur.181..662K.doi:10.1038/181662a0.PMID 13517261.S2CID 4162786.
  28. ^Zhou ZH (April 2008)."Towards atomic resolution structural determination by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy".Current Opinion in Structural Biology.18 (2):218–228.doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.03.004.PMC 2714865.PMID 18403197.
  29. ^Keskin O, Tuncbag N, Gursoy A (April 2008). "Characterization and prediction of protein interfaces to infer protein-protein interaction networks".Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology.9 (2):67–76.doi:10.2174/138920108783955191.hdl:11511/32640.PMID 18393863.
  30. ^"Summary Statistics".RCSB PDB. Retrieved2024-04-20.
  31. ^McDonald AG, Tipton KF (2023)."Enzyme nomenclature and classification: the state of the art".The FEBS Journal.290 (9):2214–2231.doi:10.1111/febs.16274.ISSN 1742-464X.PMID 34773359.
  32. ^The Gene Ontology Consortium (January 2008)."The Gene Ontology project in 2008".Nucleic Acids Research.36 (Database issue): D440–4.doi:10.1093/nar/gkm883.PMC 2238979.PMID 17984083.
  33. ^Ekman D, Björklund AK, Frey-Skött J, Elofsson A (April 2005). "Multi-domain proteins in the three kingdoms of life: orphan domains and other unassigned regions".Journal of Molecular Biology.348 (1):231–243.doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.007.PMID 15808866.
  34. ^Nelson DL, Cox MM (2005).Lehninger's Principles of Biochemistry (4th ed.). New York, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  35. ^Gutteridge A, Thornton JM (November 2005). "Understanding nature's catalytic toolkit".Trends in Biochemical Sciences.30 (11):622–629.doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.09.006.PMID 16214343.
  36. ^abcdefgMurray RF, Harper HW, Granner DK, Mayes PA, Rodwell VW (2006).Harper's Illustrated Biochemistry. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill.ISBN 978-0-07-146197-9.
  37. ^abReusch W (5 May 2013)."Peptides & Proteins".Michigan State University Department of Chemistry.
  38. ^Stryer L (2002).Biochemistry (Fifth ed.).W. H. Freeman and Company. p. 826.ISBN 0-7167-4684-0.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: overridden setting (link)
  39. ^abcLodish H, Berk A, Matsudaira P, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Scott MP, et al. (2004).Molecular Cell Biology (5th ed.). New York, New York: WH Freeman and Company.
  40. ^Ardejani MS, Powers ET, Kelly JW (August 2017)."Using Cooperatively Folded Peptides To Measure Interaction Energies and Conformational Propensities".Accounts of Chemical Research.50 (8):1875–1882.doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00195.PMC 5584629.PMID 28723063.
  41. ^abcdBranden C, Tooze J (1999).Introduction to Protein Structure. New York: Garland Pub.ISBN 978-0-8153-2305-1.
  42. ^abcdefghijVan Holde KE, Mathews CK (1996).Biochemistry. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings.ISBN 978-0-8053-3931-4.
  43. ^Milo R (December 2013)."What is the total number of protein molecules per cell volume? A call to rethink some published values".BioEssays.35 (12):1050–1055.doi:10.1002/bies.201300066.PMC 3910158.PMID 24114984.
  44. ^Beck M, Schmidt A, Malmstroem J, Claassen M, Ori A, Szymborska A, et al. (November 2011)."The quantitative proteome of a human cell line".Molecular Systems Biology.7: 549.doi:10.1038/msb.2011.82.PMC 3261713.PMID 22068332.
  45. ^Wu L, Candille SI, Choi Y, Xie D, Jiang L, Li-Pook-Than J, et al. (July 2013)."Variation and genetic control of protein abundance in humans".Nature.499 (7456):79–82.Bibcode:2013Natur.499...79W.doi:10.1038/nature12223.PMC 3789121.PMID 23676674.
  46. ^Ellis R (1979). "The most abundant protein in the world".Trends in Biochemical Sciences.4 (11):241–244.doi:10.1016/0968-0004(79)90212-3.
  47. ^Dobson CM (2000). "The nature and significance of protein folding". In Pain RH (ed.).Mechanisms of Protein Folding. Oxford, Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–28.ISBN 978-0-19-963789-8.
  48. ^Kozlowski LP (January 2017)."Proteome-pI: proteome isoelectric point database".Nucleic Acids Research.45 (D1):D1112 –D1116.doi:10.1093/nar/gkw978.PMC 5210655.PMID 27789699.
  49. ^Fulton AB, Isaacs WB (April 1991). "Titin, a huge, elastic sarcomeric protein with a probable role in morphogenesis".BioEssays.13 (4):157–161.doi:10.1002/bies.950130403.PMID 1859393.S2CID 20237314.
  50. ^Bruckdorfer T, Marder O, Albericio F (February 2004). "From production of peptides in milligram amounts for research to multi-tons quantities for drugs of the future".Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology.5 (1):29–43.doi:10.2174/1389201043489620.PMID 14965208.
  51. ^Schwarzer D, Cole PA (December 2005). "Protein semisynthesis and expressed protein ligation: chasing a protein's tail".Current Opinion in Chemical Biology.9 (6):561–569.doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.09.018.PMID 16226484.
  52. ^Kent SB (February 2009). "Total chemical synthesis of proteins".Chemical Society Reviews.38 (2):338–351.doi:10.1039/b700141j.PMID 19169452.S2CID 5432012.
  53. ^Fernández A, Scott R (September 2003)."Dehydron: a structurally encoded signal for protein interaction".Biophysical Journal.85 (3):1914–1928.Bibcode:2003BpJ....85.1914F.doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74619-0.PMC 1303363.PMID 12944304.
  54. ^abcdefGarrett R, Grisham CM (2010).Biochemistry (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.ISBN 978-0-495-10935-8.
  55. ^Drees F, Gertler FB (2008-02-01)."Ena/VASP: proteins at the tip of the nervous system".Current Opinion in Neurobiology. Development.18 (1):53–59.doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.05.007.PMC 2515615.PMID 18508258.
  56. ^Davey NE, Van Roey K, Weatheritt RJ, Toedt G, Uyar B, Altenberg B, et al. (January 2012). "Attributes of short linear motifs".Molecular BioSystems.8 (1):268–281.doi:10.1039/c1mb05231d.PMID 21909575.
  57. ^Kumar M, Gouw M, Michael S, Sámano-Sánchez H, Pancsa R, Glavina J, et al. (2020-01-08)."ELM-the eukaryotic linear motif resource in 2020".Nucleic Acids Research.48 (D1):D296 –D306.doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1030.PMC 7145657.PMID 31680160.
  58. ^Voet D, Voet JG. (2004).Biochemistry Vol 1 3rd ed. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.
  59. ^Sankaranarayanan R, Moras D (2001)."The fidelity of the translation of the genetic code".Acta Biochimica Polonica.48 (2):323–335.doi:10.18388/abp.2001_3918.PMID 11732604.
  60. ^Copland JA, Sheffield-Moore M, Koldzic-Zivanovic N, Gentry S, Lamprou G, Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou F, et al. (June 2009). "Sex steroid receptors in skeletal differentiation and epithelial neoplasia: is tissue-specific intervention possible?".BioEssays.31 (6):629–641.doi:10.1002/bies.200800138.PMID 19382224.S2CID 205469320.
  61. ^Samarin S, Nusrat A (January 2009)."Regulation of epithelial apical junctional complex by Rho family GTPases".Frontiers in Bioscience.14 (3):1129–1142.doi:10.2741/3298.PMID 19273120.
  62. ^Bairoch A (January 2000)."The ENZYME database in 2000".Nucleic Acids Research.28 (1):304–305.doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.304.PMC 102465.PMID 10592255.
  63. ^Radzicka A, Wolfenden R (January 1995). "A proficient enzyme".Science.267 (5194):90–93.Bibcode:1995Sci...267...90R.doi:10.1126/science.7809611.PMID 7809611.
  64. ^EBI External Services (2010-01-20)."The Catalytic Site Atlas at The European Bioinformatics Institute". Ebi.ac.uk.Archived from the original on 2013-08-03. Retrieved2011-01-16.
  65. ^Pickel B, Schaller A (October 2013). "Dirigent proteins: molecular characteristics and potential biotechnological applications".Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.97 (19):8427–8438.doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5167-4.PMID 23989917.S2CID 1896003.
  66. ^Rüdiger H, Siebert HC, Solís D, Jiménez-Barbero J, Romero A, von der Lieth CW, et al. (April 2000). "Medicinal chemistry based on the sugar code: fundamentals of lectinology and experimental strategies with lectins as targets".Current Medicinal Chemistry.7 (4):389–416.doi:10.2174/0929867003375164.PMID 10702616.
  67. ^National Research Council (US) Subcommittee on Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity (2001),"Experimental Animal and In Vitro Study Designs",Evaluating Chemical and Other Agent Exposures for Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity, National Academies Press, retrieved2024-12-23
  68. ^Ricard J, Cornish-Bowden A (July 1987)."Co-operative and allosteric enzymes: 20 years on".European Journal of Biochemistry.166 (2):255–272.doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13510.x.PMID 3301336.
  69. ^Lipinski C, Hopkins A (December 2004)."Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine".Nature.432 (7019):855–861.Bibcode:2004Natur.432..855L.doi:10.1038/nature03193.PMID 15602551.
  70. ^Danchin A, Médigue C, Gascuel O, Soldano H, Hénaut A (1991)."From data banks to data bases".Research in Microbiology.142 (7–8):913–916.doi:10.1016/0923-2508(91)90073-J.PMID 1784830.
  71. ^abTerpe K (January 2003). "Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems".Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.60 (5):523–533.doi:10.1007/s00253-002-1158-6.PMID 12536251.S2CID 206934268.
  72. ^Hey J, Posch A, Cohen A, Liu N, Harbers A (2008). "Fractionation of Complex Protein Mixtures by Liquid-Phase Isoelectric Focusing".2D PAGE: Sample Preparation and Fractionation. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 424. pp. 225–239.doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-064-9_19.ISBN 978-1-58829-722-8.PMID 18369866.
  73. ^Stepanenko OV, Verkhusha VV, Kuznetsova IM, Uversky VN, Turoverov KK (August 2008)."Fluorescent proteins as biomarkers and biosensors: throwing color lights on molecular and cellular processes".Current Protein & Peptide Science.9 (4):338–369.doi:10.2174/138920308785132668.PMC 2904242.PMID 18691124.
  74. ^Yuste R (December 2005). "Fluorescence microscopy today".Nature Methods.2 (12):902–904.doi:10.1038/nmeth1205-902.PMID 16299474.S2CID 205418407.
  75. ^Margolin W (January 2000). "Green fluorescent protein as a reporter for macromolecular localization in bacterial cells".Methods.20 (1):62–72.doi:10.1006/meth.1999.0906.PMID 10610805.
  76. ^Hrycaj S (17 October 2023)."Immunohistochemistry: Origins, Tips, and a Look to the Future".The Scientist Magazine. Retrieved2024-12-22.
  77. ^abWalker JH, Wilson K (2000).Principles and Techniques of Practical Biochemistry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 287–89.ISBN 978-0-521-65873-7.
  78. ^Mayhew TM, Lucocq JM (August 2008)."Developments in cell biology for quantitative immunoelectron microscopy based on thin sections: a review".Histochemistry and Cell Biology.130 (2):299–313.doi:10.1007/s00418-008-0451-6.PMC 2491712.PMID 18553098.
  79. ^Hohsaka T, Sisido M (December 2002). "Incorporation of non-natural amino acids into proteins".Current Opinion in Chemical Biology.6 (6):809–815.doi:10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00376-9.PMID 12470735.
  80. ^Cedrone F, Ménez A, Quéméneur E (August 2000). "Tailoring new enzyme functions by rational redesign".Current Opinion in Structural Biology.10 (4):405–410.doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00106-8.PMID 10981626.
  81. ^Görg A, Weiss W, Dunn MJ (December 2004). "Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics".Proteomics.4 (12):3665–3685.doi:10.1002/pmic.200401031.PMID 15543535.S2CID 28594824.
  82. ^Conrotto P, Souchelnytskyi S (September 2008). "Proteomic approaches in biological and medical sciences: principles and applications".Experimental Oncology.30 (3):171–180.PMID 18806738.
  83. ^Koegl M, Uetz P (December 2007). "Improving yeast two-hybrid screening systems".Briefings in Functional Genomics & Proteomics.6 (4):302–312.doi:10.1093/bfgp/elm035.PMID 18218650.
  84. ^Plewczyński D, Ginalski K (2009)."The interactome: predicting the protein-protein interactions in cells".Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters.14 (1):1–22.doi:10.2478/s11658-008-0024-7.PMC 6275871.PMID 18839074.
  85. ^Zhang C, Kim SH (February 2003)."Overview of structural genomics: from structure to function".Current Opinion in Chemical Biology.7 (1):28–32.doi:10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00015-7.PMID 12547423.
  86. ^Gonen T, Cheng Y, Sliz P, Hiroaki Y, Fujiyoshi Y, Harrison SC, et al. (December 2005)."Lipid-protein interactions in double-layered two-dimensional AQP0 crystals".Nature.438 (7068):633–638.Bibcode:2005Natur.438..633G.doi:10.1038/nature04321.PMC 1350984.PMID 16319884.
  87. ^Standley DM, Kinjo AR, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H (July 2008)."Protein structure databases with new web services for structural biology and biomedical research".Briefings in Bioinformatics.9 (4):276–285.doi:10.1093/bib/bbn015.PMID 18430752.
  88. ^Walian P, Cross TA, Jap BK (2004)."Structural genomics of membrane proteins".Genome Biology.5 (4): 215.doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-4-215.PMC 395774.PMID 15059248.
  89. ^Sleator RD (2012). "Prediction of Protein Functions".Functional Genomics. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 815. pp. 15–24.doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-424-7_2.ISBN 978-1-61779-423-0.PMID 22130980.
  90. ^Zhang Y (June 2008)."Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction".Current Opinion in Structural Biology.18 (3):342–348.doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.02.004.PMC 2680823.PMID 18436442.
  91. ^Xiang Z (June 2006)."Advances in homology protein structure modeling".Current Protein & Peptide Science.7 (3):217–227.doi:10.2174/138920306777452312.PMC 1839925.PMID 16787261.
  92. ^Zhang Y, Skolnick J (January 2005)."The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.102 (4):1029–1034.Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.1029Z.doi:10.1073/pnas.0407152101.PMC 545829.PMID 15653774.
  93. ^Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D (November 2003). "Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy".Science.302 (5649):1364–1368.Bibcode:2003Sci...302.1364K.doi:10.1126/science.1089427.PMID 14631033.S2CID 1939390.
  94. ^Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT (March 2004). "Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life".Journal of Molecular Biology.337 (3):635–645.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.120.5605.doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002.PMID 15019783.
  95. ^Ritchie DW (February 2008). "Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking".Current Protein & Peptide Science.9 (1):1–15.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.211.4946.doi:10.2174/138920308783565741.PMID 18336319.
  96. ^Zagrovic B, Snow CD, Shirts MR, Pande VS (November 2002). "Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing".Journal of Molecular Biology.323 (5):927–937.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.142.8664.doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00997-X.PMID 12417204.
  97. ^Herges T, Wenzel W (January 2005). "In silico folding of a three helix protein and characterization of its free-energy landscape in an all-atom force field".Physical Review Letters.94 (1): 018101.arXiv:physics/0310146.Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94a8101H.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.018101.PMID 15698135.S2CID 1477100.
  98. ^Hoffmann M, Wanko M, Strodel P, König PH, Frauenheim T, Schulten K, et al. (August 2006). "Color tuning in rhodopsins: the mechanism for the spectral shift between bacteriorhodopsin and sensory rhodopsin II".Journal of the American Chemical Society.128 (33):10808–10818.Bibcode:2006JAChS.12810808H.doi:10.1021/ja062082i.PMID 16910676.
  99. ^Mendive-Tapia D, Mangaud E, Firmino T, de la Lande A, Desouter-Lecomte M, Meyer HD, et al. (January 2018). "Multidimensional Quantum Mechanical Modeling of Electron Transfer and Electronic Coherence in Plant Cryptochromes: The Role of Initial Bath Conditions".The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.122 (1):126–136.doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10412.PMID 29216421.
  100. ^Strümpfer J, Schulten K (August 2012)."Open Quantum Dynamics Calculations with the Hierarchy Equations of Motion on Parallel Computers".Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation.8 (8):2808–2816.doi:10.1021/ct3003833.PMC 3480185.PMID 23105920.
  101. ^Scheraga HA, Khalili M, Liwo A (2007). "Protein-folding dynamics: overview of molecular simulation techniques".Annual Review of Physical Chemistry.58:57–83.Bibcode:2007ARPC...58...57S.doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104614.PMID 17034338.
  102. ^Zheng S, Javidpour L, Sahimi M, Shing KS, Nakano A (2020). "sDMD: An open source program for discontinuous molecular dynamics simulation of protein folding and aggregation".Computer Physics Communications.247: 106873.Bibcode:2020CoPhC.24706873Z.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106873.
  103. ^Muñoz-Huerta RF, Guevara-Gonzalez RG, Contreras-Medina LM, Torres-Pacheco I, Prado-Olivarez J, Ocampo-Velazquez RV (August 2013)."A review of methods for sensing the nitrogen status in plants: advantages, disadvantages and recent advances".Sensors.13 (8):10823–10843.Bibcode:2013Senso..1310823M.doi:10.3390/s130810823.PMC 3812630.PMID 23959242.
  104. ^Martin PD, Malley DF, Manning G, Fuller L (November 2002). "Determination of soil organic carbon and nitrogen at the field level using near-infrared spectroscopy".Canadian Journal of Soil Science.82 (4):413–422.doi:10.4141/S01-054.
  105. ^Radzicka A, Wolfenden R (1 January 1996). "Rates of Uncatalyzed Peptide Bond Hydrolysis in Neutral Solution and the Transition State Affinities of Proteases".Journal of the American Chemical Society.118 (26):6105–6109.Bibcode:1996JAChS.118.6105R.doi:10.1021/ja954077c.
  106. ^Keller J (2013). "Gastrointestinal Digestion and Absorption".Encyclopedia of Biological Chemistry. Elsevier. pp. 354–359.doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-378630-2.00106-7.ISBN 978-0-12-378631-9.
  107. ^Oda K (2012)."New families of carboxyl peptidases: serine-carboxyl peptidases and glutamic peptidases".Journal of Biochemistry.151 (1):13–25.doi:10.1093/jb/mvr129.PMID 22016395.
  108. ^Switzar L, Giera M, Niessen WM (1 March 2013). "Protein Digestion: An Overview of the Available Techniques and Recent Developments".Journal of Proteome Research.12 (3):1067–1077.doi:10.1021/pr301201x.PMID 23368288.
  109. ^Drauz K, Grayson I, Kleemann A, Krimmer HP, Leuchtenberger W, Weckbecker C (2007). "Amino Acids".Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry.doi:10.1002/14356007.a02_057.pub2.ISBN 978-3-527-30385-4.
  110. ^Gosline J, Lillie M, Carrington E, Guerette P, Ortlepp C, Savage K (February 2002). Bailey AJ, Macmillan J, Shrewry PR, Tatham AS (eds.)."Elastic proteins: biological roles and mechanical properties".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.357 (1418):121–132.doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.1022.PMC 1692928.PMID 11911769.
  111. ^Maruyama K, Natori R, Nonomura Y (July 1976). "New elastic protein from muscle".Nature.262 (5563):58–60.Bibcode:1976Natur.262...58M.doi:10.1038/262058a0.PMID 934326.
  112. ^Tskhovrebova L, Trinick J (February 2012)."Making muscle elastic: the structural basis of myomesin stretching".PLOS Biology.10 (2): e1001264.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001264.PMC 3279349.PMID 22347814.
  113. ^Mizraji E, Acerenza L, Lin J (November 1987). "Viscoelastic models for enzymes with multiple conformational states".Journal of Theoretical Biology.129 (2):163–175.Bibcode:1987JThBi.129..163M.doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80010-3.PMID 3455460.
  114. ^Schiller T, Scheibel T (2024-04-18)."Bioinspired and biomimetic protein-based fibers and their applications".Communications Materials.5 (1): 56.Bibcode:2024CoMat...5...56S.doi:10.1038/s43246-024-00488-2.
  115. ^Sun J, He H, Zhao K, Cheng W, Li Y, Zhang P, et al. (September 2023)."Protein fibers with self-recoverable mechanical properties via dynamic imine chemistry".Nature Communications.14 (1): 5348.Bibcode:2023NatCo..14.5348S.doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41084-1.PMC 10475138.PMID 37660126.
  116. ^abcdeGuthold M, Liu W, Sparks EA, Jawerth LM, Peng L, Falvo M, et al. (2007-10-02)."A comparison of the mechanical and structural properties of fibrin fibers with other protein fibers".Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.49 (3):165–181.doi:10.1007/s12013-007-9001-4.PMC 3010386.PMID 17952642.
  117. ^Wang K, Meng X, Guo Z (2021)."Elastin Structure, Synthesis, Regulatory Mechanism and Relationship With Cardiovascular Diseases".Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.9: 596702.doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.596702.PMC 8670233.PMID 34917605.
  118. ^Debelle L, Tamburro AM (February 1999). "Elastin: molecular description and function".The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology.31 (2):261–272.doi:10.1016/S1357-2725(98)00098-3.PMID 10216959.
  119. ^abKhoury LR, Popa I (November 2019)."Chemical unfolding of protein domains induces shape change in programmed protein hydrogels".Nature Communications.10 (1): 5439.Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.5439K.doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13312-0.PMC 6884551.PMID 31784506.
  120. ^Tan R, Shin J, Heo J, Cole BD, Hong J, Jang Y (October 2020). "Tuning the Structural Integrity and Mechanical Properties of Globular Protein Vesicles by Blending Crosslinkable and NonCrosslinkable Building Blocks".Biomacromolecules.21 (10):4336–4344.doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01147.PMID 32955862.
  121. ^Souza PC, Alessandri R, Barnoud J, Thallmair S, Faustino I, Grünewald F, et al. (April 2021)."Martini 3: a general purpose force field for coarse-grained molecular dynamics"(PDF).Nature Methods.18 (4):382–388.doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01098-3.PMID 33782607.
  122. ^"Piotr Szymczak's Homepage".www.fuw.edu.pl. Retrieved2024-05-13.
  123. ^Mapplebeck S, Booth J, Shalashilin D (August 2021)."Simulation of protein pulling dynamics on second time scale with boxed molecular dynamics".The Journal of Chemical Physics.155 (8): 085101.Bibcode:2021JChPh.155h5101M.doi:10.1063/5.0059321.PMID 34470356.
  124. ^Carrion-Vazquez M, Marszalek PE, Oberhauser AF, Fernandez JM (September 1999)."Atomic force microscopy captures length phenotypes in single proteins".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.96 (20):11288–11292.Bibcode:1999PNAS...9611288C.doi:10.1073/pnas.96.20.11288.PMC 18026.PMID 10500169.
  125. ^McKittrick J, Chen PY, Bodde SG, Yang W, Novitskaya EE, Meyers MA (2012-04-03)."The Structure, Functions, and Mechanical Properties of Keratin".JOM.64 (4):449–468.Bibcode:2012JOM....64d.449M.doi:10.1007/s11837-012-0302-8.
  126. ^Yang L, van der Werf KO, Fitié CF, Bennink ML, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J (March 2008)."Mechanical properties of native and cross-linked type I collagen fibrils".Biophysical Journal.94 (6):2204–2211.Bibcode:2008BpJ....94.2204Y.doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.111013.PMC 2257912.PMID 18032556.
  127. ^Lessen HJ, Fleming PJ, Fleming KG, Sodt AJ (August 2018)."Building Blocks of the Outer Membrane: Calculating a General Elastic Energy Model for β-Barrel Membrane Proteins".Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation.14 (8):4487–4497.doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00377.PMC 6191857.PMID 29979594.

Further reading

Textbooks
  • Branden C, Tooze J (1999).Introduction to Protein Structure. New York: Garland Pub.ISBN 978-0-8153-2305-1.
  • Murray RF, Harper HW, Granner DK, Mayes PA, Rodwell VW (2006).Harper's Illustrated Biochemistry. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill.ISBN 978-0-07-146197-9.
  • Van Holde KE, Mathews CK (1996).Biochemistry. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co., Inc.ISBN 978-0-8053-3931-4.
History
  • Tanford C, Reynolds JA (2001).Nature's Robots: A History of Proteins. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, USA.ISBN 978-0-19-850466-5.

External links

Protein at Wikipedia'ssister projects

Databases and projects

Tutorials and educational websites

Introduction
to genetics
Transcription
Types
Key elements
Post-transcription
Translation
Types
Key elements
Regulation
Influential people
Processes
Structures
Types
Proteins: keymethods of study
Experimental
Bioinformatics
Assay
Display techniques
Super-resolution microscopy
General
Energy
metabolism
Aerobic respiration
Anaerobic respiration
  • Electron acceptors other than oxygen
Fermentation
Specific
paths
Protein metabolism
Amino acid
Nucleotide
metabolism
Carbohydrate metabolism
(carbohydrate catabolism
andanabolism)
Human
Nonhuman
Lipid metabolism
(lipolysis,lipogenesis)
Fatty acid metabolism
Other
Other
Portals:
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Protein&oldid=1280577585"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp