This article is about the historian and author of theSecret History. For other persons with the given name, seeProcopius (given name). For the spider genus, seeProcopius (spider).
Apart from his own writings, the main source for Procopius's life is an entry in theSuda,[4] a Byzantine Greek encyclopaedia written sometime after 975 which (based on older sources) discusses his early life. He was a native ofCaesarea in theprovince ofPalaestina Prima.[5] He would have received a conventional upper-class education in theGreek classics andrhetoric,[6] perhaps at the famousschool at Gaza.[7] He may have attended law school, possibly atBerytus (present-dayBeirut) orConstantinople (nowIstanbul),[8][a] and became a lawyer (rhetor).[4] He evidently knewLatin, as was natural for a man with legal training.[b]
In 527, the first year of the reign of the emperorJustinianI, Procopius became the legal adviser (adsessor) forBelisarius, a Roman general whom Justinian made his chief military commander in a great attempt to restore control over the lost western provinces of the empire.[c]
Procopius was with Belisarius on the eastern front until the latter was defeated at theBattle of Callinicum in 531[12] and recalled to Constantinople.[13] Procopius witnessed theNika riots of January, 532, which Belisarius and his fellow generalMundus repressed with a massacre in theHippodrome there.[14] In 533, he accompanied Belisarius on his victorious expedition against theVandal kingdom inNorth Africa, took part in the capture ofCarthage, and remained in Africa with Belisarius's successorSolomon the Eunuch when Belisarius returned east to the capital. Procopius recorded a few of theextreme weather events of 535–536, although these were presented as a backdrop to Byzantine military activities, such asa mutiny in and around Carthage.[15][d] He rejoined Belisarius for his campaign against theOstrogothic kingdom in Italy and experienced theGothic siege of Rome that lasted a year and nine days, ending in mid-March 538. He witnessed Belisarius's entry into the Gothic capital,Ravenna, in 540. Both theWars[16] and theSecret History suggest that his relationship with Belisarius cooled thereafter. Perhaps he accompanied the general once more to the Persian front in 542. When Belisarius was sent back to Italy in 544 to cope witha renewal of the war with the Goths, now led by the able kingTotila, Procopius appears to have no longer been on Belisarius's staff.[citation needed]
Asmagister militum, Belisarius was an "illustrious man" (Latin:vir illustris;Ancient Greek:ἰλλούστριος,illoústrios); being hisadsessor, Procopius must therefore have had at least the rank of a "visible man" (vir spectabilis). He thus belonged to the mid-ranking group of the senatorial order (ordo senatorius). However, theSuda, which is usually well-informed in such matters, also describes Procopius himself as one of theillustres. Should this information be correct, Procopius would have had a seat inConstantinople's senate, which was restricted to theillustres under Justinian.
It is not certain when Procopius died. Many historians—includingHoward-Johnson,Cameron, and Geoffrey Greatrex—date his death to 554, but there was an urban prefect of Constantinople (praefectus urbi Constantinopolitanae) who was called Procopius in 562. In that year, Belisarius was implicated in a conspiracy and was brought before this urban prefect.[17]
The writings of Procopius are the primary source of information for the rule of the emperorJustinianI. Procopius was the author of ahistory in eight books on the wars prosecuted by Justinian, apanegyric on the emperor's public works projects throughout the empire, and a book known as theSecret History that claims to report the scandals that Procopius could not include in his officially sanctioned history for fear of angering the emperor, his wife, Belisarius, and the general's wife Antonia.
Procopius'sWars orHistory of the Wars (Ancient Greek:Ὑπὲρ τῶν Πολέμων Λόγοι,Hypèr tōn Polémon Lógoi, "Words on the Wars";Latin:De Bellis, "On the Wars") is his most important work, although less well known than theSecret History.[18] The first seven books seem to have been largely completed by 545 and may have been published as a set. They were, however, updated to mid-century before publication, with the latest mentioned event occurring in early 551. The eighth and final book brought the history to 553.
The first two books—often known asThe Persian War (Latin:De Bello Persico)—deal with the conflict between the Romans andSassanid Persia inMesopotamia,Syria,Armenia,Lazica, andIberia (present-dayGeorgia).[19] It details the campaigns of the Sassanid shahKavadhI, the 532'Nika' revolt, the war by Kavadh's successorKhosrauI in 540, his destruction ofAntioch and deportation of its inhabitants to Mesopotamia, and thegreat plague that devastated the empire from 542. ThePersian War also covers the early career of Procopius's patronBelisarius in some detail.[20]
TheWars’ next two books—known asThe Vandal War orVandalic War (Latin:De Bello Vandalico)—cover Belisarius'ssuccessful campaign against theVandal kingdom that had occupied Rome's provinces innorthwest Africa for the last century.
The final four books—known asThe Gothic War (Latin:De Bello Gothico)—cover theItalian campaigns by Belisarius and others againstthe Ostrogoths. Procopius includes accounts of the1st and2nd sieges of Naples and the1st,2nd, and3rd sieges of Rome. He also includes an account of the rise of theFranks (seeArborychoi). The last book describes theeunuchNarses's successful conclusion of the Italian campaign and includes some coverage of campaigns along the empire's eastern borders as well.
The War histories contain various longer excursions on different topics. These serve both literary and thematic purposes by providing the necessary background information as well as contextualising the acts of war described on different levels.[21][22] TheWars proved influential on later Byzantine historiography.[23] In the 570sAgathias wroteHistories, a continuation of Procopius's work in a similar style.
Belisarius may be this bearded figure on the right of EmperorJustinian I in the mosaic in theChurch of San Vitale,Ravenna, which celebrates the reconquest of Italy by theRoman army under the skillful leadership of Belisarius.
Procopius's now famousAnecdota, also known asSecret History (Ancient Greek:Ἀπόκρυφη Ἱστορία,Apókryphe Historía;Latin:Historia Arcana), was discovered centuries later at theVatican Library in Rome[24] and published inLyon byNiccolò Alamanni in 1623. Its existence was already known from theSuda, which referred to it as Procopius's "unpublished works" containing "comedy" and "invective" of Justinian, Theodora, Belisarius and Antonina. TheSecret History covers roughly the same years as the first seven books ofThe History of the Wars and appears to have been written after they were published. Current consensus generally dates it to 550, or less commonly 558. Since no author seems to have been aware of this work for centuries, even though Procopius was widely read and quoted, theSecret History appears to have remained unknown for several generations. How and when the text was published is unknown.
In the eyes of many scholars, theSecret History reveals an author who had become deeply disillusioned with Emperor Justinian, his wifeTheodora, the generalBelisarius, and his wifeAntonina. The work claims to expose the secret springs of their public actions, as well as the private lives of the emperor and his entourage. In recent years, however, other scholars have warned against confusing the account in theSecret History with Procopius' actual opinion.[25] Justinian is portrayed as cruel, venal, prodigal, and incompetent. In one passage, it is even claimed that he was possessed by demonic spirits or was himself a demon lord:
And some of those who have been with Justinian at the palace late at night, men who were pure of spirit, have thought they saw a strange demoniac form taking his place. One man said that the Emperor suddenly rose from his throne and walked about, and indeed he was never wont to remain sitting for long, and immediately Justinian's head vanished, while the rest of his body seemed to ebb and flow; whereat the beholder stood aghast and fearful, wondering if his eyes were deceiving him. But presently he perceived the vanished head filling out and joining the body again as strangely as it had left it.[26]
Similarly, the Theodora of theSecret History is a garish portrait of vulgarity and insatiable lust juxtaposed with cold-blooded self-interest, shrewishness, and envious and fearful mean-spiritedness. Among the more titillating (and dubious) revelations in theSecret History is Procopius's account of Theodora's thespian accomplishments:
Often, even in the theatre, in the sight of all the people, she removed her costume and stood nude in their midst, except for a girdle about the groin: not that she was abashed at revealing that, too, to the audience, but because there was a law against appearing altogether naked on the stage, without at least this much of a fig-leaf. Covered thus with a ribbon, she would sink to the stage floor and recline on her back. Slaves to whom the duty was entrusted would then scatter grains of barley from above into the calyx of this passion flower, whence geese, trained for the purpose, would next pick the grains one by one with their bills and eat.[27]
Justinian and Theodora are portrayed as the antithesis of good rulers, with each representing the opposite side of the emotional spectrum. Justinian was approachable and kindly, even while ordering property confiscations or people's destruction. Conversely, Theodora was described as irrational and driven by her anger, often by minor affronts.[28]
Furthermore,Secret History portrays Belisarius as a weak man completely emasculated by his wife, Antonina, who is portrayed in very similar terms to Theodora. They are both said to be former actresses and close friends. Procopius claimed Antonina worked as an agent for Theodora against Belisarius, and had an ongoing affair with Belisarius' godson, Theodosius.
The Buildings (Ancient Greek:Περὶ Κτισμάτων,Perì Ktismáton;Latin:De Aedificiis, "On Buildings") is apanegyric on Justinian's public works projects throughout the empire.[29] The first book may date to before the collapse of the first dome ofHagia Sophia in 557, but some scholars think that it is possible that the work postdates the building of thebridge over the Sangarius in the late 550s.[30] Historians considerBuildings to be an incomplete work due to evidence of the surviving version being a draft with two possible redactions.[29][31]
Buildings was likely written at Justinian's behest, and it is doubtful that its sentiments expressed are sincere. It tells us nothing further about Belisarius, and it takes a sharply different attitude towards Justinian. He is presented as an idealisedChristian emperor who built churches for the glory of God and defenses for the safety of his subjects. He is depicted showing particular concern for the water supply, building newaqueducts and restoring those that had fallen into disuse. Theodora, who was dead when this panegyric was written, is mentioned only briefly, but Procopius's praise of her beauty is fulsome.
Due to thepanegyrical nature of Procopius'sBuildings, historians have discovered several discrepancies between claims made by Procopius and accounts in other primary sources. A prime example is Procopius's starting the reign of Justinian in 518, which was the start of the reign of his uncle and predecessorJustin I. By treating the uncle's reign as part of his nephew's, Procopius was able to credit Justinian with buildings erected or begun under Justin's administration. Such works include renovation of the walls ofEdessa after its 525 flood and consecration of several churches in the region. Similarly, Procopius falsely credits Justinian for the extensive refortification of the cities ofTomis andHistria inScythia Minor. This had been carried out underAnastasius I, who reigned before Justin.[32]
Procopius is generally believed to be aligned with the senatorial ranks that disagreed with Justinian's tax policy (Secret History 12.12-14).[33][34] Over time, Procopius' initial optimism may have been replaced by his disillusionment with Belisarius and increasing dislike of Justinian.[35]
Henning Börm has argued that Procopius prepared theSecret History as an exaggerated document out of fear that a conspiracy might overthrow Justinian's regime, which—as a kind of court historian—might be reckoned to include him. The unpublished manuscript would then have been an insurance that could be offered to the new ruler as a way to avoid punishment. If this hypothesis is correct, theSecret History would not be proof that Procopius hated Justinian or Theodora.[36]
Anthony Kaldellis suggests that theSecret History tells the dangers of "the rule of women". For Procopius, it was not that women could not lead an empire, but only women demonstrating masculine virtues could.[37] According to Averil Cameron, the definition of "feminine" behavior in the sixth century would be described as "intriguing" and "interfering".[38] At his core, Procopius wanted to preserve the social order.[e]
Averil Cameron makes a case that all of his works form a continuous, unified discourse, rather than being contradictory to one another.[40] In her view, Procopius was a better reporter than a historian, whose strength lay in descriptions rather than analyses.[41] She argues that his vision is too black-and-white and remains almost silent on theological and ecclesiastical debates.[42] However, Shaun Tougher notes Procopius' intention to write an ecclesiastical history, which may have provided a more holistic picture of his time, and argues that Procopius should not be assessed as negatively.[43]
Procopius belongs to the school oflate antique historians who continued the traditions of theSecond Sophistic. They wrote inAttic Greek. Their models wereHerodotus,Polybius and in particularThucydides. Their subject matter was secular history. They avoided vocabulary unknown to Attic Greek and inserted an explanation when they had to use contemporary words. Thus Procopius includes glosses of monks ("the most temperate of Christians") and churches (as equivalent to a "temple" or "shrine"), since monasticism was unknown to the ancient Athenians and theirekklesía had beena popular assembly.[44]
The secular historians eschewed the history of the Christian church. Ecclesiastical history was left to a separate genre afterEusebius.Cameron has argued that Procopius's works reflect the tensions between the classical and Christian models of history in 6th-century Constantinople. This has been supported byWhitby's analysis of Procopius's depiction of the capital andits cathedral in comparison to contemporary pagan panegyrics.[45] Procopius can be seen as depicting Justinian as essentially God'svicegerent, making the case for buildings being a primarily religious panegyric.[46] Procopius indicates that he planned to write an ecclesiastical history himself[47] and, if he had, he would probably have followed the rules of that genre. As far as known, however, such an ecclesiastical history was never written.
Some historians have criticized Propocius's description of some barbarians, for example, he dehumanized the unfamiliar Moors as "not even properly human". This was, however, inline with Byzantine ethnographic practice in late antiquity.[48]
Dewing, H. B., ed. (1914–1940).Procopius. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press and Hutchinson. Seven volumes, Greek text and English translation.
Downey, G.; Dewing, Henry B., eds. (1940).Buildings of Justinian.Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Procopius: The Secret History. Penguin Classics. Translated byWilliamson, G. A. Revised by Peter Sarris. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. 2007 [1966].ISBN978-0140455281.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link) English translation of theAnecdota.
Prokopios: The Secret History. Translated by Anthony Kaldellis. Indianapolis: Hackett. 2010.ISBN978-1603841801.
^For an alternative reading of Procopius as a trained engineer, see Howard-Johnson.[9]
^Procopius uses and translates a number of Latin words in hisWars.Börm suggests a possible acquaintance with Vergil and Sallust.[10]
^Procopius speaks of becoming Belisarius's advisor (symboulos) in that year.[11]
^Before modern times, European and Mediterranean historians, as far as weather is concerned, typically recorded only the extreme or major weather events for a year or a multi-year period, preferring to focus on the human activities of policymakers and warriors instead.
^Henning Börm described this social order as a "social hierarchy: people stood over animals, freemen stood over slaves, men stood over eunuchs, and men stood over women. Whenever Procopius denounces the alleged breach of these rules, he is following the rules of historiography."[39]
^Procopius (1914)."Procopius, de Bellis. H.B. (Henry Bronson) Dewing, Ed. [First section:] Procop. Pers. 1.1".Perseus Digital Library. Retrieved18 October 2023.[Opening line in Greek] Προκόπιος Καισαρεὺς τοὺς πολέμους ξυνέγραψεν οὓς Ἰουστινιανὸς ὁ Ῥωμαίων βασιλεὺς πρὸς βαρβάρους διήνεγκε τούς τε ἑῴους καὶ ἑσπερίους,... Translation: Procopius from Caesarea wrote the history of the wars of Roman Emperor Justinianus against the barbarians of the East and of the West... Greek text edition by Henry Bronson Dewing, 1914.
^abDowney, Glanville: "The Composition of Procopius, De Aedificiis", inTransactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 78: pp. 171–183;abstract from JSTOR.
^Whitby, Michael: "Procopian Polemics: a review of A. KaldellisProcopius of Caesarea. Tyranny, History, and Philosophy at the End of Antiquity", inThe Classical Review 55 (2006), pp. 648ff.
^Kaldellis, Anthony (2013).Ethnography after antiquity : foreign lands and peoples in Byzantine literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 10.ISBN978-0-8122-0840-5.OCLC859162344.
^de Camp, L. Sprague (1949).Lest Darkness Fall. Ballantine Books. p. 111.
Brodka, Dariusz:Prokop von Caesarea. Hildesheim: Olms 2022.
Cameron, Averil (1985).Procopius and the Sixth Century. London: Duckworth.
Cresci, Lia Raffaella (2001). "Procopio al confine tra due tradizioni storiografiche" [Procopius on the border between two historiographical traditions].Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica.129:61–77.
Evans, James A. S. (1972).Procopius. New York: Twayne Publishers.
Kaldellis, Anthony (2004).Procopius of Caesarea: Tyranny, History and Philosophy at the End of Antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.ISBN978-0-8122-0241-0.
Stewart, Michael (2020).Masculinity, Identity, and Power Politics in the Age of Justinian: A Study of Procopius. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.ISBN978-90-485-4025-9.
Ziebuhr, Albrecht (2024).Die Exkurse im Geschichtswerk des Prokopios von Kaisareia: Literarische Tradition und spätantike Gegenwart in klassizistischer Historiographie [The digressions in the historical works of Prokopios of Kaisareia: literary tradition and the late antique present in classical historiography].Hermes Einzelschriften. Vol. 126. Stuttgart: Steiner.ISBN9783515136709.
Adshead, Katherine:Procopius' Poliorcetica: continuities and discontinuities, in: G. Clarke et al. (eds.):Reading the past in late antiquity, Australian National UP, Rushcutters Bay 1990, pp. 93–119
Braund, David:Procopius on the Economy of Lazica, in:The Classical Quarterly 41 (1991), 221–225.
Brodka, Dariusz:Die Geschichtsphilosophie in der spätantiken Historiographie. Studien zu Prokopios von Kaisareia, Agathias von Myrina und Theophylaktos Simokattes. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2004.
Cameron, Averil:The scepticism of Procopius, in:Historia 15 (1966), 466–482.
Colvin, Ian:Reporting Battles and Understanding Campaigns in Procopius and Agathias: Classicising Historians' Use of Archived Documents as Sources, in: A. Sarantis (ed.):War and warfare in late antiquity. Current perspectives, Leiden: Brill 2013, 571–598.
Cristini, Marco:Il seguito ostrogoto di Amalafrida: confutazione di Procopio, Bellum Vandalicum 1.8.12, in:Klio 99 (2017), 278–289.
Cristini, Marco:Totila and the Lucanian Peasants: Procop. Goth. 3.22.20, in:Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 61 (2021), 73–84.
Croke, Brian and James Crow:Procopius and Dara, in:The Journal of Roman Studies 73 (1983), 143–159.
Lillington-Martin, Christopher:Procopius on the struggle for Dara and Rome, in A. Sarantis, N. Christie (eds.):War and Warfare in Late Antiquity: Current Perspectives (Late Antique Archaeology 8.1–8.2 2010–11), Leiden: Brill 2013, pp. 599–630,ISBN978-90-04-25257-8;
Lillington-Martin, Christopher: “La defensa de Roma por Belisario” in:Justiniano I el Grande (Desperta Ferro) edited by Alberto Pérez Rubio, no. 18 (July 2013), pages 40–45, ISSN 2171-9276
Lillington-Martin, Christopher (ed.):Procopius of Caesarea: Literary and Historical Interpretations. Routledge (2017),www.routledge.com/9781472466044;
Maas, Michael Robert:Strabo and Procopius: Classical Geography for a Christian Empire, in H. Amirav et al. (eds.):From Rome to Constantinople. Studies in Honour of Averil Cameron, Leuven: Peeters, 2007, 67–84.
Max, Gerald E., "Procopius' Portrait of the (Western Roman) Emperor Majorian: History and Historiography,"Byzantinische Zeitschrift, Sonderdruck Aus Band 74/1981, pp. 1–6.
Meier, Mischa:Prokop, Agathias, die Pest und das ′Ende′ der antiken Historiographie, inHistorische Zeitschrift 278 (2004), 281–310.
Meier, Mischa and Federico Montinaro (eds.):A Companion to Procopius of Caesarea. Brill, Leiden 2022, ISBN 978-3-89781-215-4.
Whately, Conor,Battles and Generals: Combat, Culture, and Didacticism in Procopius' Wars. Leiden, 2016.
Whitby, Michael "Procopius and the Development of Roman Defences in Upper Mesopotamia", in P. Freeman and D. Kennedy (ed.),The Defence of the Roman and Byzantine East, Oxford, 1986, 717–35.
Complete Works 2, Greek ed. by K. W. Dindorf, Latin trans. by Claude Maltret inCorpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae Pars II Vol. 2, 1833. (Gothic Wars I–IV)
Complete Works 3, Greek ed. by K. W. Dindorf, Latin trans. by Claude Maltret inCorpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae Pars II Vol. 3, 1838. (Secret History,Buildings of Justinian)
