Thepre-Adamite hypothesis orpre-Adamism is thetheological belief that humans (or intelligent yet non-human creatures) existed before the biblical characterAdam. Pre-Adamism is therefore distinct from the conventionalAbrahamic belief that Adam was thefirst human. "Pre-Adamite" is used as a term, both for those humans (or human-like animals) believed to exist before Adam, and for believers or proponents of this hypothesis.
The first known debate about human antiquity took place in 170 AD between a Christian,Theophilus of Antioch, and anEgyptianpagan, Apollonius the Egyptian (probablyApollonius Dyscolus), who argued that the world was 153,075 years old.[1]: 26
An early challenge tobiblical Adamism came from theRoman EmperorJulian the Apostate, who, upon his rejection of Christianity and his return to paganism, accepted the idea that many pairs of original people had been created, a belief termed co-Adamism or multiple Adamism.[2]: 6 [1]: 27-28,125
Augustine of Hippo'sThe City of God contains two chapters indicating a debate between Christians and pagans over human origins: Book XII, chapter 10 is titledOf the falseness of the history that the world hath continued many thousand years and the title of book XVIII, chapter 40 isThe Egyptians' abominable lyings, to claim their wisdom the age of 100,000 years. These titles tend to indicate that Augustine saw pagan ideas concerning both the history of the world and the chronology of the human race as incompatible with theGenesis creation narrative. Augustine's explanation aligned with most rabbis, and with the church fathers, who generally dismissed views on the antiquity of the world as "myths and fables", whereas Jewish and Christian claims were based on "revealed truth".[1]: 27
Augustine did take a critical view of the young earth narrative in some aspects, arguing that everything in the universe had been created simultaneously by God, and not seven literal days. He was primarily concerned with arguing against the idea of humanity having existed eternally rather than a Bible-based chronology of human history.[3]
In earlyIslam, a common belief held that mankind is actually the successor of other intelligent creatures such asjinn andhinn. Medieval Muslim traditions referred to the jinn as pre-Adamites,[4]: 39 depicted as human-like in various ways. Although the notion of jinn as pre-Adamites was generally accepted, the idea that other humans lived before the knownAdam was controversial. From the mid-ninth century onward the idea appeared thatGod created several Adams, each of whom presides over an era lasting around 50,000 years. This concept was regarded as heretical, but was widely accepted byIsmailis and someSufis.[5]: 230–232
A book titledNabatean Agriculture, written or translated byIbn Wahshiyya in 904, collated texts about the activities and beliefs of Arabic groups such as theNabataeans, in defense ofBabylonian culture against Islam. The book discussed the ideas that people lived before Adam, that he had parents, and that he came fromIndia.[1]: 28 It proposed that Adam was the father of an agricultural civilization, rather than the father of the entire human race.[2]: 7
TheJewish poetYehuda Halevi wrote hisKitab al Khazari between 1130 and 1140, which featured a discussion wherein the King of theKhazars questioned three theologians (a Jewishrabbi, aChristian, and aMuslim) which was the true religion, and raised the challenge that people in India said they had buildings and antiquities which were millions of years old. The rabbi responded that his faith was unshaken, as the Indians lacked "a fixed form of religion, or a book concerning which a multitude of people held the same opinion, and in which no historical discrepancy could be found." The rabbi dismissed Indians as dissolute, unreliable people, whose claims could be ignored. Later in the book, Halevi rejected theNabatean claims as these people did not know of therevelation inScripture, and he dismissed Greek theories of an eternal world. In his conclusion, Halevi maintained that Adam was the first human in this world but left open other possibilities: "If, after all, a believer in the Law finds himself compelled to admit an eternal matter and the existence of many worlds prior to this one, this would not impair his belief that this world was created at a certain epoch, and that Adam and Noah were the first human beings."[1]: 27–28
The claims inNabatean Agriculture were also disputed byMaimonides (1135–1204) inThe Guide for the Perplexed. He attributed the concepts to theSabians and said they were just legends and mythology which deviated from monotheism though drawing on Jewish sources, but in refuting the speculations, he circulated an outline of the ideas among other scholars:[2]: 7–8 "They deemAdam to have been an individual born of male and female like any other human individuals, but they glorify him and say that he was a prophet, the envoy of the moon, who called people to worship the moon. and there are compilations of his on how to cultivate the soil." He noted the claim that Adam came from India, and went on to Babylon.[1]: 29–30
The presence of a belief in the existence of men before Adam among theFamilists, a religious community inFriesland, was noted by John Rogers in 1578.[6]: 51
In 1591,Giordano Bruno argued that, because no one could imagine that the Jews and theEthiopians had the same ancestry, God must have either created separate Adams or that Africans were the descendants of pre-Adamic races.[7]: 25–26
The 17th-century FrenchmillenarianIsaac La Peyrère is usually credited with formulating the pre-Adamite theory because of his influence on subsequent thinkers and movements. In hisPrae-Adamitae, published in Latin in 1655, La Peyrère argued that Paul's words inRomans 5:12–14 should be interpreted to mean that "ifAdam sinned in a morally meaningful sense there must have been an Adamic law according to which he sinned. If law began with Adam, there must have been a lawless world before Adam, containing people."[6]: 53 Thus, according to La Peyrère, there must have been two creations; first the creation of theGentiles and then the creation of Adam, who was the father of theHebrews.[8]: 152 The existence of pre-Adamites, La Peyrère argued, explainedCain's taking of a wife and the building of a city afterAbel's murder in theBook of Genesis.[1]: 43
InPolitica Hermetica, Laszlo Toth wrote that "racial theory has as its official birthdate 24 April 1684," whenFrançois Bernier distinguished four or fiveraces in an article titledA new division of the Earth, according to the different species or races of men who inhabit it published in theJournal des sçavans. Because of widespread theological opposition to the pre-Adamite theories of his friend La Peyrère, Bernier published his paper anonymously.[9]: 52–53 [10]
During theAge of Enlightenment, pre-Adamism was adopted widely as a challenge to the biblical account of human origins.[citation needed] In the 19th century, the idea was welcomed by advocates ofwhite superiority. A number of racist interpretive frameworks involving the early chapters of Genesis arose from pre-Adamism. Some pre-Adamite theorists held the view that Cain left his family for an inferior tribe described variously as "nonwhiteMongols" or that Cain took a wife from one of the inferior pre-Adamic peoples.[8]: 154
| Part ofa series on |
| Christian Identity |
|---|
 |
 Category |
In 19th-century Europe, pre-Adamism was attractive to those who were intent on demonstrating the inferiority of non-Western peoples, and in theUnited States, it appealed to those who were attuned toracial theories but found it unattractive to contemplate a common history withnon-whites.
Scientists such asCharles Caldwell,Josiah C. Nott andSamuel G. Morton rejected the view that non-whites were the descendants of Adam. Morton combined pre-Adamism withcranial measurements. AsMichael Barkun explains:
In such an intellectual atmosphere, pre-Adamism appeared in two different but not wholly incompatible forms. Religious writers continued to be attracted to the theory both because it appeared to solve certainexegetical problems (where did Cain's wife come from?) and exalted the spiritual status of Adam's descendants. Those of a scientific bent found it equally attractive but for different reasons, connected with a desire to formulate theories of racial difference that retained a place for Adam while accepting evidence that many cultures were far older than the few thousand years that humanity had existed, according to the biblical chronology. The two varieties differed primarily in the evidence they used, the one relying principally on scriptural texts and the latter on what passed at the time forphysical anthropology.[8]: 153
In 1860,Isabella Duncan wrotePre-Adamite Man, Or, The Story of Our Old Planet and Its Inhabitants, Told by Scripture & Science, a mixture ofgeology and scriptural interpretation. The book was popular among a number of geologists because it mixed biblical events with science. She suggested that the pre-Adamites are today'sangels.[2]: 90 Since they were withoutsin, for sin did not enter the world until Adam disobeyed God, there was no reason for them not to have been at leastraptured intoheaven, anticipating what would again occur with thesecond coming of Jesus Christ. Duncan also believed that some angels had sinned and fallen from Heaven, which caused them to becomedemons. Duncan believed that such an upheaval would leave geological scars on the earth. The concept ofice ages, pioneered byLouis Agassiz, seemed to provide evidence of such events, drawing the line between the pre-Adamic era and the modern one, which she posited began about 6,000 years ago.[11]: 142–144
In 1867,Buckner H. Payne, writing under the pen name Ariel, published a pamphlet titledThe Negro: What is His Ethnological Status? He insisted that all of the sons ofNoah had been white. According to his hypothesis, if theFlood had been universal, the only survivors of it should have been white, so why werenon-white people living on Earth? To answer this question, Payne suggested that the "Negro" is a pre-Adamic human of the field (specifically, a higher order which was preserved onNoah's Ark. According to Payne, the Pre-Adamites were a separate species without immortal souls.[12]: 149
The Irish lawyerDominick McCausland, a Biblical literalist and anti-Darwinian polemicist, maintained the theory in order to uphold the Mosaic timescale. He believed that theChinese were descended from Cain and he also believed that the "Caucasian race" would eventually exterminate all other races. He also believed that only the "Caucasian" descendants of Adam were capable of creatingcivilization, and he tried to explain away the existence of the numerous non-"Caucasian" civilizations by attributing all of them to a vanished "Caucasian race", theHamites.[13]
In 1875, A. Lester Hoyle wrote a book,The Pre-Adamite, or who tempted Eve? In his book, he claimed that there had been five distinct creations of races, but only the fifth race, the white race, of which Adam was the father, had been made in God's own image and likeness.[12]: 150 Hoyle further suggested that Cain was the "mongrel offspring" of Eve's being seduced by "an enticing Mongolian" with whom she had repeated trysts, thus laying the foundation for the white supremacist bio-theology thatmiscegenation was "an abomination".[2]: 197
In an unusual blend of contemporary evolutionary thinking and pre-Adamism, theVanderbilt Universitytheistic evolutionist and geologistAlexander Winchell argued in his 1878 tract,Adamites and Preadamites, for the pre-Adamic origins of the human race, on the basis that the Negroes were too racially inferior to have been descended from the Biblical Adam. Winchell also believed that the laws of evolution operated according to the will ofGod.[14]: 50
In 1891, William Campbell, under the pen name "Caucasian", wrote inAnthropology for the People: A Refutation of the Theory of the Adamic Origin of All Races that the non-white peoples were not the descendants of Adam and were therefore "not brothers in any proper sense of the term, but inferior creations" and he also wrote thatpolygenism was the "only theory reconcilable with scripture." Like Payne before him, Campbell viewed theGreat Flood as a consequence ofintermarriage between the white (Adamic) and the nonwhite (pre-Adamic) peoples "the only union we can think of that is reasonable and sufficient to account for the corruption of the world and the consequent judgement."[15]: 43
In 1900, Charles Carroll wrote the first of his two books on pre-Adamism,The Negro a Beast; or, In the Image of God, in which he sought to revive the ideas which had previously been presented by Buckner H. Payne, describing the Negro as a literal ape rather than a human.[16] In a second book which was published in 1902,The Tempter of Eve, he put forth the idea that the serpent was actually a black female, and he also theorized thatmiscegenation was the greatest of all sins.[17]: 277 Carroll claimed that the pre-Adamite races, such as blacks, did not have souls. He believed that race mixing was an insult to God because it spoiled His racial plan of creation, and he also believed that the mixing of races had led to the errors ofatheism andevolution.[12]: 150
The Scottish millennialist George Dickison wroteThe Mosaic Account of Creation, As Unfolded in Genesis, Verified by Science in 1902. The book mixed science with a scientifically enhanced reading of Genesis and it also listed geological discoveries which showed that men existed before Adam had been created and proved that Earth was much older than the 6000-year-old span of the Adamic race. Dickison welcomed scientific discoveries from fossil evidence and the palaontological record and used them as evidence of pre-Adamism.[12]: 165–166
The idea that "lower races" are mentioned in the Bible (in contrast to Aryans) was posited in the 1905 bookTheozoology: or The Science of the Sodomite Apelings and the Divine Electron by Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels, an Ariosophist and a volkisch writer who influenced Nazism.[18]: x
The doctrine which is known asBritish Israelism, which developed inEngland in the 19th century, also included a pre-Adamic worldview but Pre-Adamism was a minority position. The model viewed pre-Adamites as a race of inferior bestial creatures which was not descended from Adam, because according to it, Adam was the first white man and consequently, he was the first son of God. In the narrative,Satan seduces Eve, and the resulting offspring is ahybrid creature, Cain. Later, Cain flees toEast Turkestan to establish a colony of followers who are intent on realizing the Devil's plan for domination of the earth. A further elaboration of this myth involved the identification of theJews with theCanaanites, the putative descendants of Cain, but theeponymous ancestor of the Canaanites is not Cain, butCanaan. It followed that if thetribes of Judah were supposed to have intermarried with Cain's descendants, the Jews were both the offspring of Satan and the descendants of sundry nonwhite pre-Adamic races.[8]: 150–172
In the United States,philo-Semitic British Israelism developed into theantisemiticChristian Identity movement and theserpent seed doctrine. Identity preacherConrad Gaard wrote that the serpent was a "beast of the field" who was the father of Cain, and since Cain married a pre-Adamite, his descendants were a "mongrel, hybrid race".[8]: 177–178
TheoccultistPaschal Beverly Randolph publishedPre-Adamite Man: Demonstrating The Existence of the Human Race Upon the Earth 100,000 Thousand Years Ago! under the name Griffin Lee in 1863. The book took a primarily scientific view of pre-Adamism, relying on evidence from linguistics, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology, and ancient history. Being a polygenist, Randolph argued that the color of races, particularly black, was not the result of climate and was proof of separate, pre-Adamite origins.[2]: 110-111
Pre-Adamite theories have also been held by a number of mainstream Christians such as theCongregational evangelistR. A. Torrey (1856–1928), who believed in theGap Theory. Torrey believed it was possible to accept both evolution andbiblical infallibility, with the pre-Adamite as the bridge between religion and science.[2]: 202
Gleason Archer Jr. was a believer in pre-Adamism. In his 1985 bookA Survey of Old Testament Introduction he wrote,[19]: 204
To revert to the problem of thePithecanthropus, theSwanscombe man, theNeanderthal and all the rest (possibly even theCro-magnon man, who is apparently to be classed asHomo sapiens, but whose remains seem to date back at least to 20,000 B.C.) it seems best to regard these races as all prior to Adam's time, and not involved in the Adamic covenant. We must leave the question open, in view of the cultural remains, whether these pre-Adamic creatures had souls (or, to use the trichotomic terminology, spirits).
Archer asserted that only Adam and his descendants were infused with the breath of God and a spiritual nature corresponding to God himself, and that all mankind subsequent to Adam's time must have been literally descended from him. Regarding the concept of pre-Adamic races (such as the Cro-Magnon man), he says: "They may have been exterminated by God for unknown reasons prior to the creation of the original parent of the present human race."[19]: 205 [20]
More recently, such ideas have been promoted byKathryn Kuhlman andDerek Prince amongPentecostals,John Stott amongAnglicans,Old Earth creationistHugh Ross,[21] and computational biologistS. Joshua Swamidass.[22]