Postanalytic philosophy describes a detachment from the mainstream philosophical movement ofanalytic philosophy, which is the predominant school of thought inEnglish-speaking countries. TheInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines the movement as denoting "philosophers who owe much to Analytic philosophy but who think that they have made some significant departure from it."^[1] The movement cannot be unified into a single positive project as it is defined in terms of what it stands against, although it has generally been seen as bridging the gap between analytic andcontinental philosophy.^[2]: 7

Postanalytic philosophy derives mainly from contemporary American thought, especially from the works of philosophersRichard Rorty,Donald Davidson,Hilary Putnam,Thomas Nagel, andStanley Cavell. The term is closely associated with the much broader movement of contemporaryAmerican pragmatism, which advocates a detachment from the context-invariant variety of 'objective truth' promulgated by early modern philosophers such as Descartes. All or almost all philosophers associated with this detachment from analytic philosophy have been in some way influenced by the thought of thelater Wittgenstein, who is often seen as pre-emptively dissolving the analytical approach from within.^[3] Postanalytic philosophers emphasize the contingency of human thought,convention,utility,social progress, and are generally hesitant to develop and defend positive theses.

A relatively recent resurgence of interest inordinary language philosophy, particularly due to the literature and teachings of Cavell, has also become a mainstay of postanalytic philosophy. Seeking to avoid the increasingly metaphysical and abstruse language found in mainstream analytic philosophy,posthumanism, andpost-structuralism, a number of feminist philosophers have adopted the methods of ordinary language philosophy.^[4] Many of these philosophers were students or colleagues of Cavell. This approach may be compared and contrasted withneopragmatism,^[5] a tradition which owes much to Rorty, althoughW. V. O. Quine andWilfrid Sellars may be thought of as precursors of this development.^[6]

The term "postanalytic philosophy" itself has been used in a vaguely descriptive sense and not in the sense of a concrete philosophical movement.^{[by whom?]} Many postanalytic philosophers write along an analytic vein and on traditionally analytic topics. Richard Rorty said: "I think that analytic philosophy can keep its highly professional methods, the insistence on detail and mechanics, and just drop its transcendental project. I'm not out to criticize analytic philosophy as a style. It's a good style. I think the years of superprofessionalism were beneficial."^[7]

Rorty says the goal of postanalytic philosophy is not to oppose analytic philosophy or its methods, but to dispute its hope to make philosophy the penultimate form of knowledge from which every other knowledge claim must be derived.^{[citation needed]}

Postanalytic philosophy may also be known aspost-philosophy,^[8] a term used by Rorty, to emphasize the notion that the project of philosophy as conceived byEnlightenment philosophers no longer serves the role it used to in society and that this role has been replaced by other media.

• Post-analytic phenomenology
• Post-Continental philosophy

• John Rajchman &Cornel West,Post-Analytic Philosophy, Columbia University Press, 1985.
• Bernard Williams, 'What Might Philosophy Become?', inPhilosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, Princeton University Press, 2006.

• Analytic philosophy
• Philosophical theories

• CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list
• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata
• Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from September 2022
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from September 2022