Political satire is a type ofsatire that specializes in gaining entertainment frompolitics. Political satire can also act as a tool for advancing political arguments in conditions where political speech and dissent are banned.
Political satire is usually distinguished from politicalprotest orpolitical dissent, as it does not necessarily carry an agenda nor seek to influence the political process. While occasionally it may, it more commonly aims simply to provide entertainment. By its very nature, it rarely offers a constructive view in itself; when it is used as part of protest or dissent, it tends to simply establish the error of matters rather than provide solutions.[1] Because of the exaggerated[2] manner of these parodies, satirical news shows can more effectively sway their audiences to believe specific ideas by overemphasizing the flaws of the critiqued subject.[3] This can be very harmful to the reputation of public figures or organizations since the satire frames them in a comical way.[4]
Satire can be traced back throughout history; wherever organizedgovernment, or social categories have existed, so has satire.[5]
The oldest example that has survived until today isAristophanes. In his time, satire targeted top politicians, like Cleon,[6] and religion, at the time headed by Zeus. "Satire and derision progressively attacked even the fundamental and most sacred facts of faith," leading to an increased doubt towards religion by the general population.[7] The Roman period, for example, gives us the satirical poems and epigrams ofMartial.Cynic philosophers often engaged in political satire.
Due to the lack of political freedom of speech in many ancient civilizations,covert satire is more common than overt satire in ancient literature ofpolitical liberalism. Historically,public opinion in theAthenian democracy was remarkably influenced by the politicalsatire performed by thecomic poets at thetheatres.[8] Watching or reading satire has since ancient times been considered one of the best ways to understand a culture and a society.[9][10][11]
During the 20th and 21st centuries, satire was found in an increasing number of media (incartoons such aspolitical cartoons with heavycaricature and exaggeration andpolitical magazines) and the parallel exposure ofpolitical scandals to performances (includingtelevision shows). Examples include musicians such asTom Lehrer incorporating lyrics which targeted the army and the church,[12] live performance groups like theCapitol Steps and theMontana Logging and Ballet Co., and public television and live performerMark Russell who made satirist comments to both democrats and republicans alike.[13] Additional subgenres include such literary classics asGulliver's Travels andAnimal Farm, and more recently, the digitalonline magazine and website sources such asThe Onion.
One example isMaurice Joly's 1864 pamphlet entitledThe Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu), which attacks the political ambitions ofNapoleon III. It was first published inBrussels in 1864. The piece used the literary device of adialogue between two diabolical plotters inHell, the historical characters ofMachiavelli andMontesquieu, to cover up a direct, and illegal, attack on Napoleon's rule. The noble baron Montesquieu made the case forliberalism; theFlorentine political writer Machiavelli presented the case for cynicaldespotism. In this manner, Joly communicated the secret ways in which liberalism might spawn a despot like Napoleon III.[14]
The literacy rate in France was roughly 30 percent in the 19th century making it virtually impossible for people of lower classes to engage in political satire. However, visual arts could be interpreted by anyone, and a man named Charles Philipon took advantage creating two weekly magazines, La Caricature and Le Charivari – the cheaper of the two. Philipon used his papers, which had become more and more popular across France, as a threat to the King, Louis-Philippe, as the papers used satire and humor to criticize the government and King. Several attempts to suppress the two magazines were made by the monarchy which would only make the articles more critical. Philipon was eventually taken to court and sentenced to 13 months in prison following several more arrests.[15]
The drawings that originally sent Philipon to court were drawings that turned the King into a pear over the course of the drawings. The people of France began to recognize that King Louis-Philippe really did look like a pear and could not separate the two. People began to sarcastically state that pears should be banned in the country as cutting one would be a threat towards the King, Louis-Philippe.[15]
According toSantayana, German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was actually "a keen satirist".[16]"Nietzsche's satire" was aimed at Lutheranism.[17]
Kladderadatsch and Simplicissimus were two sources of political satire in Germany during the 18–19 century, both of which show how satire can be used to see cultural history in societies. Popularity in press and satirical jokes flourished in the 19th century as thousands of new magazines emerged in Germany. Magazines and newspapers began to exceed the consumption of books and became one of the most popular forms of media in Germany at the time.[18]
The UK has a long tradition of political satire, dating from the early years of English literature. In some readings, a number ofWilliam Shakespeare's plays can be seen – or at least performed – as satire, includingRichard III andThe Merchant of Venice. Later examples such asJonathan Swift'sA Modest Proposal are more outright in their satirical nature.
Through the 18th and 19th centurieseditorial cartoons developed as graphic form of satire, with dedicated satirical magazines such asPunch (launched 1841) appearing in the first half of the 19th century. A local satirical newspaper,The Town Crier, launched inBirmingham in 1861, has been described as setting out, through humour, to compare "municipal government as it was – in incompetent hands – with municipal government as it might be".[19][20]
The early 1960s saw the so-called "satire boom", of which the most prominent products were the stagerevueBeyond the Fringe (debuted 1960), the fortnightly magazinePrivate Eye (launched 1961) and theBBC TV showThat Was the Week That Was (1962–1963). More recent examples have included topical television panel shows such asHave I Got News for You andMock the Week, and television series such asBallot Monkeys,The Mash Report andSpitting Image.
Key political cartoonists in the United Kingdom include people such asPeter Brookes who has been a political cartoonist forThe Times since 1992 and Nicola Jennings who features regularly inThe Guardian.[21]
Comedian Tom Walker is famous for playing a political correspondent under the name of "Jonathan Pie".[citation needed]
Street artists likeBanksy have used dark political humor and witty political and social commentaries, primarily throughgraffiti, to comment on various themes such as capitalism, imperialism and war.[22] Banksy's pieces which feature street art on political satire include "Stop and Search" which illustrates the characterDorothy fromThe Wizard of Oz being searched by a police officer. Banksy mocks politicians opinions onpolice brutality as innocent Dorothy is being questioned by the police which is a representation of police brutality.[23] "Bomb Hugger" is another one of Banksy's pieces which displays a young woman hugging a bomb which was dropped by military planes.[24] He criticizes the nature of war and the opinions of politicians on the subject as the woman represents innocence being directly impacted by the "dark" bomb symbol.[24]
Political satire has played a role in American Politics since the 1700s. UnderKing George's rule, the colonies used political cartoons to criticize the parliament and fight for independence.[25] Founding fatherBenjamin Franklin was a notable political satirist. He employed satire in several essays, includingRules by Which a Great Empire May Be Reduced to a Small One andA Witch Trial at Mount Holly.[26]
Cartoons continued to provide commentary on American politics. In the late 1800s, editorial cartoonistThomas Nast employed political satire to tackle issues like corruption.[25] Amongst other notable political satirists is well-known authorMark Twain, who used satire to criticize and comment on slavery.[25]
In the 1930's, political satire dominatedBroadway. LyricistIrving Berlin and playwrightMoss Hart co-wrote the popular musicalAs Thousands Cheer. The Broadway show poked fun at politics by referencing topical news articles.[27]
Satire became more visible on American television during the 1960s. Some of the early shows that used political satire include the British and American versions of the programThat Was the Week That Was (airing on theAmerican Broadcasting Company, or ABC, in the U.S.),CBS'sThe Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour, andNBC'sRowan and Martin's Laugh-In. During the months leading up to the 1968 presidential election,Richard Nixon appeared onLaugh-In and repeated the program's catch-phrase "Sock it to me."[28] Other forms of satire of the 1960s and early 1970s typically used the sitcom format, such as the showAll in the Family.
WhenSaturday Night Live debuted in 1975, the show began to change the way that comedians would depict the president on television.Chevy Chase opened the fourth episode of the show with his impersonation of a bumblingGerald Ford.[29] Chase did not change his appearance to look like President Ford, and he portrayed the president by repeatedly falling down on the stage. Some of the other famous presidential impersonations onSaturday Night Live includeDan Aykroyd'sRichard Nixon andJimmy Carter caricatures,Dana Carvey asGeorge H. W. Bush,Darrell Hammond andPhil Hartman asBill Clinton,Will Ferrell asGeorge W. Bush,Jay Pharoah andFred Armisen asBarack Obama. Hartman was the first in a long string of cast members to impersonateDonald Trump, who was most famously impersonated byDarrell Hammond andAlec Baldwin, and currentlyJames Austin Johnson impersonates him. Johnson also impersonatesJoe Biden, who was also impersonated byJason Sudeikis andJim Carrey. Political elites like Hillary Clinton are also famously impersonated onSaturday Night Live.
During the2008 presidential campaign,Saturday Night Live gained wide attention because former cast memberTina Fey returned to the show to satirizeRepublican vice presidential candidateSarah Palin. In addition to Fey's striking physical resemblance to Palin, the impersonation of the vice presidential candidate was also noteworthy because of Fey's humorous use of some of exactly the same words Palin used in media interviews and campaign speeches as a way to perform political satire.[30]
Saturday Night Live also uses political satire throughout itsWeekend Update sketch.Weekend Update is a fake news segment on the show that satirizes politics and current events. It has been a part ofSNL since the first episode of the show on October 11, 1975.
The Daily Show andThe Colbert Report use stylistic formats that are similar toWeekend Update. OnThe Daily Show, hostJon Stewart used footage from news programs to satirize politics and the news media.Stephen Colbert performed in character onThe Colbert Report as a right-wing news pundit. Both hosts' television programs were broadcast onComedy Central.The Daily Show continues to run with Stewart as the Monday host, and featuredTrevor Noah as the host from 2015–2022; Colbert became the host ofThe Late Show, succeedingDavid Letterman.[31] With their shows, Stewart and Colbert helped increase public and academic discussion of the significance of political satire.Real Time with Bill Maher,Full Frontal with Samantha Bee andLast Week Tonight with John Oliver are also examples of satirical news shows.
During the2020 presidential campaign,perennial candidateVermin Supreme was recruited by members of theLibertarian Party to run a serious presidential campaign (Vermin Supreme 2020 presidential campaign) which utilizes his satirical character to promotelibertarianism.[32]
As early as theOttoman Empire, political satire was used to express political dissent and mobilize public opinion through shadow puppet shows, improvised folk theater and cartoons.[33][34] The Ottoman Empire's first satirical magazine was calledKaragöz, which translates to "Black eye."[33]
Turkey is home to the political satire magazine known asLeMan, which published its 1000th issue in 2010.[35] LeMan is known for its political cartoons highlighting corruption, lampooning and shedding light on serious situations using humor.
One of the most-widely read satirists is Egyptian writerLenin El-Ramly, who is credited with over 30 scripts for films and television series and 12 plays. Another notable Egyptian satirist isBassem Youssef.
In Syria, in the year 2001 a satirical newspaper known as theLamplighter was first published and resonated with the public as it sold out immediately.[35] It was the first independent paper in the country since 1965 and was created by cartoonist and satiristAli Farzat.
A 2002 example of censorship resulted in satiristAli Farzat having to remove two articles and a cartoon about the Prime Minister from a magazine, which was deemed insulting. Farzat's newspaper was subsequently shut down and his printing license was revoked.[35]
According to the findings of the 2004Pew Survey, both younger and older audiences are turning to late-night comedy shows as not only a source of entertainment, but also for an opportunity to gain political awareness.[36] For this reason, Geoffrey Baym suggests that shows that make use of political satire, such asThe Daily Show, should be considered as a form ofalternative journalism.[36] Utilizing satire has shown to be an attractive feature in news programming, drawing in the audiences of less politically engaged demographic cohorts. Moreover, satire news programming can be considered alternative because satire plays an important role in dissecting andcritiquing power.[36]
In his articleThe Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism, Baym detailed howThe Daily Show, then hosted byJon Stewart, presented news stories. For the satire news show, presenting information in a comprehensive manner was used to give viewers a greater perspective of a situation.[36] Often, Stewart studded his segments with additional background information, or reminders of relevant and past details.[36] For example,The Daily Show displayed the full video ofBush's comments regardingTenet's resignation in 2004.[36] This was a deliberate choice by the show in attempt to give a more sincere representation of the event.[36] Moreover, it can be seen as a challenge and critique of what more traditional news shows failed to include.[36] In this way, satire news can be seen as more informative than other news sources. Notably, research findings released byNational Annenberg Election Survey (NAES) concede that followers of satire news are more knowledgeable and consume more news than the general population.[36]
Meanwhile, Joseph Faina has considered the satire used in news shows as a facilitator in developing apublic journalism practice.[37] Faina explains in his article that the nature of satire encourages viewers to become politically engaged, and acivic participant, in which the humor exercised by hosts elicit responses in viewers.[37] However, Faina has acknowledged that this model is somewhat idealistic.[37] Nevertheless, Faina argues that the potential still exists.[37] Not to mention, with the rise in technology and the growing ubiquity of cellular phones, it can be argued that civic participation is all the more easy to accomplish.[38]
Modern studies of the effects of political satire have shown that political satire has an influence on political participation,[39] in fact research has shown that an exposure to satire of a political nature evokes negative emotions which consequently mobilizes political participation.[39] It is documented that watching late-night comedy shows increases political participation due to the interpersonal discussions and online interaction that follows as a result of political satire.[39]
On the other hand, some scholars have expressed concern over the influence of political comedy shows, it is argued that rather than increase political participation it has the adverse effect. Rather than mobilize participation it can actually demobilize participation due to the negative analysis of political figures, leading to cynicism towards the government and electoral system.[39] Research has shown that voter attitude shifts positively in relation to political figures who find humor in their ridicule.[40] This has to do with the feeling of relating to politicians, who allow themselves to be seen as the comedians joke.[41] Political satire may also be used to cover a presidential aspect that America has a problem with. Joe Biden utilized humor in his campaign for presidency as he joked about the concern of his age.[42]
Though satire in news is celebrated as a vehicle toward a more informed public, such view is not universally shared among scholars.[43] Critics have expressed their hesitancy toward the infiltration of lighthearted practices to cover more dire topics like political affair.[43] Potentially off-color remarks, or vulgar comments made by the likes ofStephen Colbert ofThe Late Show with Stephen Colbert, orSamantha Bee, host ofFull Frontal with Samantha Bee, can be used as examples of what critics are concerned about. Here, satire is believed to diminish the gravity of a topic.[37]
Baym proposes that as these shows arealternative, they have no obligation to "abide by standard practices".[36] Unlike traditional news sources, which may be required to adhere to certain agendas, like political affiliation or advertising restrictions, hosts of satire news shows are free and zealous to showcase personal contributions through their mentions of disdain, qualms, and excitement. Critics of satire in news shows thus believe that the showcasing of an overly and openly frustrated host will induce or perpetuate "cynicism in viewers".[43][37]
TheFinancial Times argues that political satire can contribute to "media led populism",[44] this is argued to be due to the mockery of politicians and public officials that is required to be accountable only to "audience maximisation",[44] it is argued that this form of media led populism is more prevalent in the United States than the United Kingdom, as commentators who are both Liberal and Conservative are being used more often as the "main way" in which young viewers learn about current affairs. This is particularly troublesome when commentators use polemic and sarcasm in their satire as opposed to witty humour or impersonations.
The fact that the gods could be brought down to a human or 'far too human' level is certainly rooted in the very nature of Greek religion, and there is no doubt that this attitude contributed to the gradual undermining of the old belief in the gods. [...] To tell immoral and scandalous stories about the gods did not offend average religious feeling; it troubled only advanced spirits like Xenophanes and Pintar [...] and it is clear that people no longer believed either in the story or in Zeus. Satire and derision progressively attacked even the fundamental and most sacred facts of faith, above all faith in the gods' power, and it was from this that doubt began to grow.
The power of the gods, whose dignity and stringth were impressively reflected in most of the tragedies, however different the religious attitudes of the tragic poets were, this same power was on the same festival days belittled and questioned by the comic poets who made fun of the gods and represented traditional and sacred forms in a starling manner.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
