
| ||
|---|---|---|
Politics U.S. Representative fromHawaii's 2nd district
| ||
Tulsi Gabbard has madeforeign policy the cornerstone of her political identity. Gabbard has advocated for a significantly reducedU.S. international presence that critics have characterized as approachingisolationism—a stance that has raised concerns about potentially diminishing America'sglobal leadership role.[1]
In rhetoric that often diverges from mainstream foreign policy views, Gabbard has frequently questioned Americaninterventionism abroad, using terminology such as "regime change wars" to describe operations supported by bothRepublican andDemocratic administrations.[2][3] This stance has drawn criticism fromforeign policy professionals who argue that such withdrawal-focused policies could create dangerouspower vacuums and emboldenadversarial regimes. While Gabbard has maintained a position againstISIS and otherterrorist organizations in theMiddle East,[4] her broader approach to international engagement and critique ofhumanitarian interventions has generated controversy within both parties.[5]
After departing from theDemocratic Party in 2022, Gabbard has shifted her position on many issues closer to the Republican party, includingabortion;environmental policy,gun control andthe participation of trans women in women's sports.[6][7][8][9] Gabbard expressed support forFlorida House Bill 1557, referred to by critics as the "Don't Say Gay" bill (not the official bill name)[10] and in 2022 was a featured speaker at theConservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).[11] She has frequently criticized policies of theBiden administration.[12][13][14]
Gabbard's engagement with certainauthoritarian regimes has generated significant controversy within U.S. foreign policy circles. Her January 2017 trip toSyria, during which she met with PresidentBashar al-Assad, drew widespread criticism from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers.[15] Critics argued that her meeting provided legitimacy to a leader accused ofwar crimes andhuman rights abuses against the Syrian people.[16] The trip was reportedly financed by members of a Lebanesesocialist-nationalist party with close ties to the Assad regime.[17]
Gabbard has also faced scrutiny for positions perceived as sympathetic toRussian interests. In February 2022, at the outset ofRussia's invasion of Ukraine, she suggested the conflict "could have easily been avoided if Biden Admin/NATO had simply acknowledged Russia's legitimate security concerns" regarding Ukraine's potentialNATO membership.[18] Foreign policy experts have criticized such statements as echoingRussian propaganda narratives.[19]Ivo Daalder, former U.S. ambassador to NATO, characterized her views on Russia andPutin as following "basically the Russian playbook" and described such thinking as "dangerous" for someone in a position of authority.[20]
In 2022, Gabbard made controversial statements about U.S.-fundedbiological research facilities in Ukraine that closely mirrored narratives promoted byRussian state media, leading to accusations that she was amplifyingRussian disinformation.[21] She later made it clear that they were not bioweapons facilities. Sen.Elizabeth Warren questioned whether someone with Gabbard's views should "have all of the secrets of the United States and our defense intelligence agencies when she has so clearly been in Putin's pocket."[22] These positions have continued to generate debate about Gabbard's approach to foreign policy and her perspectives onRussia–United States relations.
In 2024, Gabbard joined theRepublican Party and endorsedDonald Trump for the2024 United States presidential election.[23]
Gabbard describes herself as both ahawk and adove on the topic of foreign policy and foreign relations:
"When it comes to the war against terrorists, I'm a hawk, [but] when it comes to counterproductive wars of regime change, I'm a dove."[24]
She has said that such wars "undermine our national security and … actually increase the suffering of people in the countries where we wage them."[25] Asked if there were any wars that justified the use of US military force, Gabbard said there are "very few examples", such asWorld War II.[24] When asked about her coverage in the mainstream media, Gabbard has said: "We have seen for a long time how the mainstream media has been complicit in further pushing and pursuing the foreign policy establishment narrative."[26]
Gabbard was a five-year "term member"[27] of theCouncil on Foreign Relations (CFR).[28][29] When asked about her involvement in it, she said that while many in CFR did not share her worldview, "If we only sit in rooms with people who we agree with, then we won’t be able to bring about the kind of change that we need to see."[30]
Following her 2017 visit toSyria, Gabbard opposedUS involvement in regime change, calling it counterproductive to defeatingISIL,Al-Qaeda, and other terrorist organizations.[31][32]
Gabbard considers herself a hawk on war on terror.[33] She favors a "very limited use of drones" in situations where the "military is not able to get in without creating an unacceptable level of risk."[34]
Gabbard criticized theObama administration for "refusing" to say that "Islamic extremists" are waging a war against the United States.[35] She has said it was Al-Qaeda who "attacked us on 9/11" and it is they who "must be defeated." She continued: "Obama won't bomb them in Syria. Putin did."[36]
In 2016, Gabbard spoke out againstIslamism, stating "The ideology shared by ISIS, Al Qaeda and affiliated terrorist organizations isIslamism. Distinct from the religion of Islam, Islamism is a radical political ideology of violent jihad aimed at establishing a totalitarian society governed by laws based on a particular interpretation of Islam.”[37]
On December 20, 2019, theStop Arming Terrorists Act[38][39] that she introduced in 2017[40] became law as part ofNational Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, § 1228[41] to prohibit theDepartment of Defense from "knowingly providing weapons or any other form of support toAl Qaeda,Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, theIslamic State"[a] or other terrorist groups or individual or groups affiliated with any such organization.[42]
Gabbard's views on Islamic terrorism have distinguished her from many mainstream Democrats. In 2015 she met withU.S.-backed Egyptian presidentAbdel Fattah el-Sisi to discuss "the threat ofISIS and Islamic extremist groups".[43][44] She has advocated increasing pressure on Pakistan to stop terrorist attacks and expressed "solidarity with India" in reference to the2016 Uri attack.[45] Gabbard has said she is mindful that most Muslims are not extremist, but has criticised Obama and Hillary Clinton for not acknowledging the threat posed by radical Islam.[46]
Gabbard co-sponsored legislation that would prohibit thefirst-use ofnuclear weapons.[47][48][49]
Gabbard decries powerful politicians who "beat the drums of war and ratchet up tensions" between the U.S. and nuclear-armed countries", dragging the country toward aNew Cold Wararms race, thereby bringing "the front lines … to our doorstep, as we sit on the precipice of nuclear war." She notes that nuclear strategists say "we are at a greater risk of nuclear war than we ever have been before."[50][51]
Gabbard has introduced legislation to prevent the use of taxpayer dollars for weapons that violate the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty[52] and has expressed disappointment no moderators at the Democratic presidential primary debates have "raised the issues or asked a question related to the most existential threat we face in this country."[50][53]
In a 2018 interview withThe Intercept, Gabbard said U.S. efforts atregime change "have ended up worse off for the people of those countries and have been counterproductive to the interests of the American people."The Intercept described her as "an outspoken critic of U.S. involvement in the Middle East from the disastrous Iraq War to NATO’s 2011 intervention in Libya that followed Arab Spring protests against the brutal regime of Moammar Gadhafi."[34] She has also called for an end to the nearly two-decades-longU.S. war in Afghanistan.[54] In her February 2, 2019 campaign launch, Gabbard called on everyone to take a stand against what she described as the "neolibs and neocons" from both parties promoting regime change.[50]
According toRolling Stone columnistMatt Taibbi, Gabbard's position is "not as has been represented in most press accounts. … She’s not an isolationist. She’s simply opposed to bombing the crap out of, and occupying, foreign countries for no apparent positive strategic objective, beyond enriching contractors".[55]
On November 17, 2015, Gabbard, as one of the Hawaii legislators remarking on Gov. David Ige's support of President Obama's commitment to accept refugees from Syria, said "I’m currently … doing my due diligence on this vetting process … from the appropriate departments, from the Homeland Security, the intelligence community, and so on and so forth. The most humane thing we can do [regarding Syria] is stop creating new refugees."[56]
On November 19, 2015, Gabbard sponsored with Austin Scott (R-GA) (also a member of the House Armed Services Committee), H.R. 4108, a bipartisan bill to end U.S. efforts to overthrow the Syrian Arab Republic led by President Bashar al-Assad. Gabbard said that "The war to overthrow Assad is counter-productive because it actually helps ISIS and other Islamic extremists achieve their goal of overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad and taking control of all of Syria—which will simply increase human suffering in the region, exacerbate the refugee crisis."[57][58]
On January 26, 2017, in response to reports President Trump was expected to order a temporary ban on refugees, Gabbard commented "[W]e must address the root cause that is making people flee their homes— regime-change wars."[59] In subsequent comments, she added that in Syria she had met with pastors who described intense suffering: "The reality of a genocide against religious minorities is very real".[60]
In March 2017, in response to President Trump's announcement of a newly revised blanket ban of refugees, Gabbard said "[W]e must address the cause of this refugee crisis and end the destructive U.S. policy of counterproductive regime-change wars, as we've seen most recently in Iraq, Libya, and now in Syria."[61]
In March, 2013, Gabbard joined with ten other Democratic and eight Republican representatives in a letter to President Obama asking that he "extend and reform visa programs for Iraqi and Afghan allies … who have risked their lives to aid our troops and protect America’s security, … as federal agencies have issued only a fraction of the visas that Congress originally authorized."[62]
In September, 2015, Gabbard sponsored withDuncan Hunter (R-CA), a bill "[r]ecognizing the persecution of religious and ethnic minorities, especially Christians andYezidis by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), also known asDaesh, and calling for the immediate prioritization of accepting refugees from such communities."[63] Gabbard noted these "and other minority groups in the Middle East are being targeted specifically because of their religious beliefs, and face forced conversions to Islam, mass abductions, sexual enslavements, and executions due to this ISIL-inflicted genocide."[64]
In November, 2015, after the ISIS terrorist attacks on Paris, Gabbard and 46 other Democrats voted with congressional Republicans in favor of theAmerican Security Against Foreign Enemies (SAFE) Act of 2015 to require "supplemental certifications and background investigations on refugees from Syria and Iraq".[65][66][67][68][69] President Obama said he would veto the bill: "We are not well served when, in response to a terrorist attack, we descend into fear and panic."[70] Gabbard, in explaining her vote, said "voting for this bill was not a vote against refugees" but about "the long term viability and continuation of our country serving as a place of refuge for those who are truly in need of shelter." "It would be a double disaster if someone who came to America as a refugee ended up engaging in a terrorist act … [as] happened before in 2009, when two al-Qaeda terrorists came to the U.S. as refugees from Iraq and were actively supporting al-Qaeda from the U.S. while also plotting an attack on U.S. soil. Following their discovery and arrest, … the refugee program for Iraqis was completely shut down for six months."[71]
Also in November, 2015, Gabbard called for a suspension of theVisa Waiver Program for European passport holders until the intelligence community catches up with the influx of Syrian refugees. In response to Wolf Blitzer noting others were concerned about the economic impact of suspending the program, Gabbard said: "You want to talk about the effect on the economy if these actions are not taken and an attack is allowed to occur here, even though we’ve identified this vulnerability?"[72][73]
In January, 2017, in response to reports President Trump was expected to order a temporary ban on refugees, Gabbard said, "We shouldn’t ban refugees from entering our country. We need to responsibly ensure thorough vetting is in place …"[74] She called the president's order "unacceptable".[60]
In March, 2017, in response to President Trump's announcement of a newly revised blanket ban of refugees, Gabbard said, "True to our history and values as a nation, we have served as a place of refuge to the most vulnerable in the world. We should not be putting in place a blanket ban of refugees …."[61]
While Gabbard initially voted in favor of sanctions,[75] she has since condemned the act of "starving [other nations] with draconian sanctions".[76] In March 2019, she cosponsored Rep. Khanna's letter which expresses concern of the Trump administration's "misguided policies" such as "broad unilateral sanctions" and how they make life worse for ordinary Venezuelan people.[77]
In June 2020, Gabbard introduced and passed an amendment to the House version of the 2021 NDAA, which would require theDepartment of Defense to assess the humanitarian impact of sanctions, though it was not included in the final bill.[78] In December 2020, she introducedH.Res.1270, which called sanctions "an instrument of modern-day economic warfare" and called for no taxpayer dollars, government personnel, or equipment should be used to impose sanctions that inflict suffering on civilian populations.[79]
In a December 2014 interview Gabbard said she was "conflicted" about thereport published that week on theCIA's use of torture in interrogations, saying, "the jury is still out on the report". She also said that while she abhorred torture, were there an imminent danger to American citizens, as president she "would do everything in my power to keep the American people safe."[80][81]
In a February 2019 interview with theStatus Coup, Gabbard said, "Through my time on the armed services committee in congress over the last five years I've supported amendments to the defense bill that ban torture, ban these enhanced interrogation techniques, and as president will continue to strongly oppose torture and the use of those techniques".[82]
In 2011 and the following years, Gabbard repeatedly requested an end to theAfghanistan war.[83][84]
At the Democratic debate on July 31, 2019, Gabbard accused Trump of continuing to betray Americans by repeatedly walking back his plans to withdraw from Afghanistan, adding that withdrawing American troops from Afghanistan was about leadership" and that "the leadership" she would bring would be "to do the right thing" and "bring our troops home within the first year in office and end the wasteful regime change wars …."[85]
AfterThe Washington Post reported on long lasting and systematic misleading of the American public by the US government about the situation and progress of theAfghanistan war,[86] Gabbard said she would introduce legislation for a congressional inquiry into "the lying and wasting of taxpayer dollars" and lives of US service members. She accused themilitary-industrial complex,contractors and consultancy companies of profiting from "a scam that ripped the US taxpayers off over a trillion dollars since9/11 in Afghanistan alone." Gabbard reiterated her request to bring US troops home from Afghanistan.[87][88]
Gabbard expressed her support for Armenia and theArmeniansChristians[89] in the conflict withAzerbaijan.[90] In 2017, Gabbard was part of a team of US lawmakers that visited Armenia, includingArtsakh, claimed by both Azerbaijan and Armenia.[91] She has accused Turkey of encouraging and inciting2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and co-signed a letter expressing concern over Azerbaijan's aggression against Artsakh and possible conflict with Armenia.[90]
In 2019, Gabbard was also a co-sponsor of theArmenian Genocide Resolution legislation, along with several other US Senators and US Representatives, to push for an official US recognition of theArmenian Genocide.[92] Regarding the 1915 mass killings, Gabbard said that "the Ottoman Empire was attempting to cleanse itself of the Armenian and Christians populations, and the US became home to many survivors".[89] In 2021, United States finally recognized the Ottoman-era mass killings of Armenians as a genocide, in spite of opposition by Turkey.[93]
During her 2020 presidential campaign, Gabbard criticized President Donald Trump's confrontational attitude towards China, instead proposing a cooperative relationship to confront global challenges such as climate change. She opposedTrump's trade war with China, calling his approach "extremely volatile" and having "ravaging and devastating effects" on both manufacturers and farmers, while expressing concern the trade war could eventually lead to a "hot war" with China. She also stated her belief that the trade war has made it more difficult to secure Chinese support over a nuclear deal with North Korea; she said America should work with China on denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.[94]

Gabbard supports a strongUS-India relationship "of mutual respect … for many reasons—not the least of which is the war against terrorists."[95] In 2014, she visited India and met with officials from both the rulingBhartiya Janata Party and the major opposition party,Indian National Congress.[96][97] Around 2015, some critics charged that she was close to Indian Prime MinisterNarendra Modi and his Hindu-nationalist party.[98] Gabbard disputed the claims that she was partial to any political party in India.[99][95]
Gabbard was critical of the U.S. decision to deny Modi a visa over allegations of his involvement in the2002 Gujarat riots, calling it a "great blunder" that could have undermined the U.S.-India relationship. In 2013 she joined some of her colleagues on theHouse Foreign Affairs Committee in opposing aHouse resolution that called for continuing the ban on Modi and for "religious freedom and related human rights to be included in the United States-India Strategic Dialogue and for such issues to be raised directly with federal and state Indian government officials". The bill admonished India to protect "the rights and freedoms of religious minorities" and specifically mentioned incidents of mass violence against India's Muslim minority that took place during Modi's tenure. Gabbard justified her opposition by saying the resolution would weaken the friendship between India and the US and citing its timing as potential interference in the Indian elections, while emphasizing the need for the U.S. to stand for religious freedom.[100]
In January 2019, an article inThe Intercept targeted Gabbard's association with some US-basedHindu diaspora organizations, including theVishwa Hindu Parishad of America and theHindu American Foundation.[44] Gabbard clarified that meeting with an elected leader was not evidence of any collusion with that leader's organization. An earlier version ofThe Intercept's article searched Gabbard's donor list for "names ... of Hindu origin" to "show Gabbard's broad base of support in the Hindu-American community".[44] Gabbard criticized this asreligious bigotry, saying that Christians would not be subject to such scrutiny based on their names.[101]The Intercept removed the sentence with an apology, saying that it was not intended "to question the motives of those political donors" and apologizing "for any such implication".[44]
In March 2025, Gabbard visited India in her role as Director of National Intelligence, and noted that President Trump and Prime Minister Modi were good friends.[102] TheMSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle was forced to correct her erroneous reporting on the India trip, in which she falsely claimed that Gabbard said President Trump and Russian President Putin were "very good friends."[103] Ruhle accepted her mistake on air and offered a clarification that, after reviewing Gabbard's full interview, it was clear that Gabbard was not referring to Putin, but was instead mentioning Trump and the Indian Prime Minister Modi being good friends.[103][104]
In 2013, Gabbard co-sponsored and voted for the Nuclear Iran Prevention Act, which imposed sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program.[105]
In 2014, Gabbard described Iran as the "world's leading state sponsor of terrorism".[106]
Despite her initial criticism of it,[107][108] Gabbard voted in favor of theJoint Comprehensive Plan of Action, an agreement with Iran that imposed restraints onIran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting nuclear-relatedsanctions against Iran.[109] She opposes the Trump administration's decision to withdraw from the JCPOA and has said that as president she would reenter the agreement, but also negotiate on remaining issues in order to find a diplomatic solution and deescalate tensions.[110]
In May 2019 Gabbard warned about the danger, costs, and consequences of a potential war withIran and criticized the Trump administration forelevating tensions.[111][112][113] She said it would be illegal for the Trump administration to take action against Iran relying on a2001 law that authorized the use ofU.S. Armed Forces against those responsible for theSeptember 11 attacks and any "associated forces".[114]
In January 2020 Gabbard denounced President Trump'sassassination of Iran's Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani and Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis as an act of war against Iran withoutcongressional declaration of war and thereby violation of the U.S. Constitution.[115] She questioned what the actual goal of the U.S. administration in Iraq is and warned of an Iranian retaliation that could lead to a devastating war.[116]
Gabbard said the U.S. regime change wars inIraq,Libya andSyria caused Iraq and Syria to seek support from Iran and thereby created the growing influence of Iran in Iraq and Syria which the U.S. now attempts to counter militarily.[117][118] After U.S. troops announced they suspended theiranti-terror operations in Iraq to concentrate on handling the fallout from Soleimani's assassination,[119] Gabbard said the act of war against Iran broke the fragile alliance between Iran, Iraq and the U.S. in combatingISIS, potentially causing a resurgence of terrorist groups. Iran's withdrawal from the JCPOA[120] means Iran gets closer to acquiring nuclear weapon capability according to Gabbard, who requested an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq and Syria to prevent the U.S. getting into the "quagmire" of a prolonged militarily"tit-for-tat".[121][122][123]
She would deescalate tensions with Iran by ending the "crippling" economic sanctions and reentering JCPOA to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapon capability.[124][125] This was in stark contrast to her previous support for Iranian sanctions.[75]
The intelligence briefing by the Trump administration did not convince Gabbard about the alleged "imminent threat" by Soleimani and gave "no justification whatsoever for this illegal and unconstitutional act of war". In her view, President Trump's actions showed a lack of basic understanding and foresight innational security.[126][127] Gabbard held a floor speech in the House to advocate for passing H.Con.Res.83[128] which reasserts the Constitutional authority of Congress to declare war and specifically directs the President to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces to engage in hostilities in or against Iran. H.Con.Res.83 passed the House with a 224–194 vote.[129]
Since 2018, Gabbard had repeatedly attempted to insert amendments into theNational Defense Authorization Act to prevent the President from starting a war with Iran without congressional approval, and she introduced theNo More Presidential Wars Act to define starting or joining a war without congressional approval an impeachable "high crime and misdemeanor".[130] However, these previous legislative efforts did not find majorities in Congress.[131] Hercampaign streamed a panel discussion withStephen Kinzer andDennis Kucinich on theIran–United States relations in a collaboration with Kim Iversen.[132]

Gabbard supports a strongU.S.-Israel relationship. In March 2015, unlike 58 other Democrats, she did not boycottBenjamin Netanyahu's address to the U.S. Congress, saying at the time that relations "must rise above the political fray, as America continues to stand with Israel as her strongest ally".[133] On July 14, 2015, Gabbard attended theChristians United for Israel (CUFI), aconservative-leaning organization.[134]
In January 2017, Gabbard voted against a House resolution condemning the U.N. Security Councilresolution onIsraeli settlements built in theWest Bank. She said: "While I remain concerned about aspects of the U.N. resolution, I share the Obama administration's reservation about the harmful impact Israeli settlement activity has on the prospects for peace."[133] She criticized Israel's use of live ammunition along theGaza fence in May 2018.[133]
In March 2019, Gabbard responded to controversies arising from tweets by Rep.Ilhan Omar (D-MN) suggesting US support for Israel is motivated by money, which were characterized by both Democrats and Republicans as anti-Semitic. Gabbard told CNN, "There are people who have expressed their offense at these statements. I think that what Congresswoman Omar was trying to get at was a deeper issue related to our foreign policy, and I think there's an important discussion that we have to be able to have openly, even though we may end up disagreeing at the end of it, but we've got to have that openness to have the conversation."[135]
On July 23, 2019, Gabbard voted in favor of House Resolution 246, which expressed House opposition to theGlobal Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement (BDS Movement) movement as delegitimizing the State of Israel, re-affirmed support for a two-state solution, and affirmed U.S. citizens rights to protest or criticize the policies of the U.S. or foreign governments.[136] Gabbard explained her vote by saying that she supported "a two-state solution that provides for the rights of both Israel and Palestine to exist, and for their people to live in peace, with security, in their homes. I don't believe the BDS movement is the only or best way to accomplish that. However, I will continue to defend those who choose to exercise their right to free speech without threat of legal action."[137]
On July 30, 2019, Gabbard co-sponsored House Resolution 496, introduced by Rep. Ilhan Omar on July 17, which "affirms that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts in pursuit of civil and human rights at home and abroad, as protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution".[138] Omar, shortly before introducing the bill, declared it "an opportunity for us to explain why it is we support a non-violent movement, which is the BDS movement".[citation needed] Gabbard explained that she co-sponsored the resolution "to affirm our freedom of speech and rights to protest or boycott for any cause", and stated that she "will continue to oppose unconstitutional legislation ... that seeks to restrict freedom of speech by imposing legal penalties against those who participate in the BDS movement".[137]
On November 14, 2023, Gabbard criticized PresidentJoe Biden and Vice PresidentKamala Harris for not joining theMarch for Israel to show solidarity with Israel during the2023 Israel-Hamas war.[139]
In December 2023, Gabbard said that "As we remember Japan's aggression in the Pacific, we need to ask ourselves this question: is the remilitarization of Japan, which is presently underway, truly a good idea? We need to be careful that shortsighted, self-serving leaders do not end up bringing us again face-to-face with a remilitarized Japan".[140][141]
In 2015, Gabbard claimed it was "understandable, given that Iran is right on their doorstep and this threat from Iran remains a concern" for Saudi Arabia to pursue its own nuclear program.[142]
Gabbard opposed a $1.15 billion arms deal withSaudi Arabia. She declared, "The U.S. must stop arming Saudi Arabia, stop fueling this fire and hold Saudi Arabia accountable for their actions."[143][144]
Gabbard has called for ending U.S. support for theSaudi-led intervention in Yemen, saying the U.S. is complicit in ahumanitarian disaster.[145][146] In September 2018 she supported legislation invoking theWar Powers Resolution of 1973 to stop U.S. involvement in the war.[147]
In November 2018, after Trump indicated the U.S. would not sanction Saudi Arabia over thekilling of Jamal Khashoggi, Gabbard tweeted at Trump, "being Saudi Arabia's bitch is not 'America First’."[148]
In October 2019, Gabbard requested the Trump administration to end all aid to Saudi Arabia until the findings of its investigation into possible Saudi involvement in the September 11 attacks are made public.[149][150]
In 2013, Gabbard opposed the Obama administration's proposed military strikes inSyria[151] and in November 2015 introduced legislation to blockCIA activities in Syria and U.S. military action against Syrian PresidentBashar al-Assad.[152][153] This legislation was referred to House committees[154] and subsequently blocked.[153]
In October, 2015,CNN'sWolf Blitzer asked Gabbard: "Does it not concern you that Bashar al-Assad's regime has been brutal, killing at least 200,000, maybe 300,000 of its own people?". Gabbard responded by commenting "the same things that are being said about Assad right now were said about Gadhafi" andSaddam Hussein "by those who were advocating for the U.S. to go in and intervene, to overthrow those regimes" and dictators. If the response is in the same way as in those wars, she continued, "we will end up with a situation far worse than we're seeing today ... with far greater human suffering, with far greater persecution of religious minorities and Christians in Syria, and our enemy will be far stronger." Hezbollah, and the Russian and Iranian involvement in Syria, were "working towards defeating our common enemy", meaning groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda, who she said made up "the vast majority" of the "so-called Syrian rebels."[155]
In March 2016, Gabbard was one of three members of Congress to vote against House Resolution 121, which condemned thegovernment of Syria and "other parties to the conflict" forwar crimes andcrimes against humanity,"[156] saying that though Assad was a "brutal dictator," the resolution was "aWar Bill—a thinly veiled attempt to use the rationale of 'humanitarianism' as a justification for overthrowing the Syrian government".[157][158] In November 2016, she met with Trump in an effort to convince him of her point of view.[159] In 2017, Gabbard cited US "regime-change" involvement in Syria as a source of theSyrian refugee crisis.[160]
In January 2017, Gabbard had two unplanned meetings with Assad during a trip to Syria and Lebanon.[161][162][163] Gabbard said that the Syrian people's message was "powerful and consistent: there is no difference between 'moderate'rebels andal-Qaeda (al-Nusra) orISIS—they are all the same". She described the Syrian conflict as "a war between terrorists under the command of groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda and the Syrian government".[164][165]
Following her meeting with Syrian religious leaders, Gabbard said in a blog post "Each [Syrian religious leader] called for peace, and an end to foreign support of terrorists who are trying to rid Syria of its secular, pluralistic, free society."[166]Asia Times, reporting on Gabbard's comments, said thatFreedom House ranked Assad's Syria close to the bottom on its freedom rankings, below North Korea, China and Iran, calling it “one of the world’s most oppressive regimes.”[citation needed]
RepublicanAdam Kinzinger said on the House floor "To say I’m disgusted would be an understatement,” “By meeting with the mass murderer of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, Tulsi Gabbard has legitimized his dictatorship and, in turn, legitimized his genocide against the Syrian people - the murdering of 50,000+ innocent children among the nearly half million total slaughtered by his regime.”[citation needed]
Hawaii News Now reported that Gabbard's visit to Assad was "roundly criticized" by both sides of the political spectrum for giving Assad international credibility despite the civilian deaths under his regime.[167]Hakim Ouansafi from theMuslim Association of Hawaii labeled the visit a "black mark" on Gabbard's record, citing international evidence of Assad's war crimes from theUN andAmnesty International.[168] However, some in the Hawaii Muslim community viewed her visit as independent and courageous, withUniversity of Hawaii professor Ibrahim Aoude expressing admiration for her bravery.[168]
Following her 2017 visit to Syria, Gabbard wrote on her blog "There is no difference between “moderate” rebels and al-Qaeda (al-Nusra) or ISIS — they are all the same. This is a war between terrorists under the command of groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda and the Syrian government. They [the Syrian people] cry out for the U.S. and other countries to stop supporting those who are destroying Syria and her people."[169]
In 2018 Gabbard characterized the US as waging a regime change war in Syria since 2011.[170]
In a February 2019 interview withMSNBC a month after the start of her presidential campaign, she said, "Assad is not the enemy of the United States because Syria does not pose a direct threat to the United States"[171][172][173] In a subsequent interview onCNN, she said "There are brutal dictators in the world. Assad of Syria is one of them. That does not mean the United States should be wagingregime-change wars around the world."[174]
In August 2019, she said that Assad is "a brutal dictator. Just likeSaddam Hussein. Just likeGadhafi in Libya. The reason that I'm so outspoken on this issue of ending these wasteful regime-change wars is because I have seen firsthand this high human cost of war and the impact that it has on my fellow brothers and sisters in uniform."[175]
In April 2017, following the Khan Shaykhun chemical attack, Tulsi Gabbard was interviewed by Wolf Blitzer on CNN. She emphasized that "What matters is the evidence and facts," stating she would denounce Assad as a war criminal if found responsible by an independent investigation. Gabbard expressed skepticism, noting, "So whether the President says that they have the evidence, the fact remains that they have not brought that evidence before Congress," and that Trump's military strike "flew directly in the face" of the UN's action "to launch an independent investigation, to find out exactly what the facts are, who was involved and who was responsible, so the appropriate consequences could be levied." She drew parallels to the Iraq War, warning against repeating "a counterproductive regime war" without clear evidence and congressional consent.[176][177]
CNN headlined their report on the interview: "Rep. Tulsi Gabbard ‘skeptical’ that Assad regime behind gas attack"[178] and tweeted "Rep. Gabbard: 'Yes, I’m skeptical' of claim Assad regime is behind chemical weapons attack."[179][180] The Washington Post included the CNN tweet four days later in their "What is Tulsi Gabbard thinking on Syria?".[181] Other stories similarly reported Gabbard's 'skepticism' without mentioning her call for evidence to be presented to Congress and a UN investigation to determine appropriate consequences, with some linking to the CNN article or tweet.[182][183] Similar reporting reappeared in the run-up to and during her presidential campaign[184][185][186][187][188][189] and, again, after her being nominated for DNI[190][191][192] Two articles that did mention Gabbard's focus on evidence were Politico in February 2019[citation needed] and the BBC in November 2024.[193]
On March 10, 2019, in a CNN Townhall, in response to Dana Bash asking "Do you remain skeptical as you were in 2017 that Bashir al Assad used chemical warfare against Syrian civilians?", Gabbard said: "I want to correct that... Chemical weapons have been used in Syria, both by the Syrian government as well as different terrorist groups... The skepticism and the questions that I raised were very specific around incidents that the Trump administration was trying to use as an excuse to launch a U.S. military attack in Syria...."[194]
On March 29, 2019, Tom McCarthy of The Guardian wrote that Gabbard had "repeatedly cast doubt on the wealth of evidence that the Syrian dictator, Bashar al-Assad, used chemical weapons on his own people."[195]
In August 2019, theTulsi 2020 presidential campaign published “Reports on Chemical Attacks in Syria” on her campaign website.[196] The document said that there "is evidence" that both sides have used chemical weapons in Syria, but that Gabbard "remained skeptical" of theKhan Shaykhun chemical attack, and theDouma chemical attack.[196] According toBellingcat, a Netherlands-basedinvestigative journalism group specializing infact-checking andopen-source intelligence, Gabbard's document presented a number of factual errors and misleading statements.[197] However, Bellingcat's critique did not indicate Gabbard's document was a compilation and juxtaposition of various analyses and reports as a skeptical check on official narratives rather than definitive conclusions.[196]
Gabbard expressed skepticism regarding claims that Assad used chemical weapons against Syrian civilians, saying that "there is evidence to suggest that the attacks may have been staged by opposition forces for the purpose of drawing the United States and the West deeper into the war."[36][24][198] Following theKhan Shaykhun chemical attack, Gabbard called for a U.N. investigation into the attack and prosecution of Assad by theInternational Criminal Court should he be found responsible.[199][200] After Trump ordered the2017 Shayrat missile strike targeting the Syrian airfield believed to be the source of the attack, Gabbard called the strike reckless "without care or consideration of the dire consequences of the United States attack on Syria without waiting for the collection of evidence from the scene of the chemical poisoning."[201][198] Her statements were sharply criticized both by former Democratic National Committee ChairmanHoward Dean and Center for American Progress PresidentNeera Tanden.[200][202]
In a 2018 interview withThe Nation, Gabbard said the United States had "been waging aregime change war in Syria since 2011. Central to that war to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad, the U.S., along with its alliesSaudi Arabia,Turkey, andQatar, has been providing direct and indirect support to terrorist organizations likeAl Qaeda".[203] In an August 2019 interview withCNN'sChris Cuomo,[204] Gabbard said of Assad: "He's a brutal dictator. Just like Saddam Hussein. Just like Gadhafi in Libya. The reason that I'm so outspoken on this issue of ending these wastefulregime-change wars is because I have seen firsthand this high human cost of war and the impact that it has on my fellow brothers and sisters in uniform".[205]
In August 2019,Eliot Higgins described Gabbard's views on chemical weapons usage in the Syrian Civil War, as expressed on her campaign website, as a "contradictory error-filled mess".[206]
Gabbard toldThe Washington Post in September 2019: "It is in our national security interests to end our regime change war in Syria. That war is prolonging the suffering of the Syrians, preventing Syrian refugees from returning home, strengthening al-Qaeda and Iran’s influence. Diplomatic relations are not a stamp of approval — they’re necessary to prevent war and resolve conflict. I would reestablish relations with Syria, whoever their president is, and work to bring peace to its long-suffering people."[207]
In October 2019, Gabbard introduced legislation[208] invoking theWar Powers Resolution of 1973 to remove all troops from Syria which have no congressional authorization for deployment.[209] The legislation specifically opposes US President Trump's announcement to militarily "secure the oil" in Syria with the prospect of perhaps having to "fight for it",[210][211] as well as Secretary of Defense Esper's announcement to deny Syrian forces access to the oil.[212] Gabbard called the US government's action in Syria "the next step of the modern daysiege that has been happening in Syria since 2011. It deprives the Syrian people of the resources they need to survive and to rebuild their lives."[213] Gabbard also called for an end to arming terrorist groups and an end to the "draconian" sanctions against Syria that prevent "the most vulnerable people" in Syria from getting "power, food and medicine".[214]
In October 2019, Gabbard described Turkish PresidentRecep Tayyip Erdogan as a "radical Islamist megalomaniac" and accused his government of supporting theAl-Qaeda andIslamic State terror organizations.[215] This earned her support from prominent Erdogan critic andNBA playerEnes Kanter.[216] She has described the method by which Trump partially withdrew troops from northeastern Syria as "laying out a red-carpet, a green light for Erdoğan and Turkey to launch an ethnic cleansing and offensive against the Kurds."[217]
Gabbard opposed theTrans-Pacific Partnership and led protests against it.[218] A member of theHouse Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific, she criticized both the deal itself and the secrecy surrounding the negotiations:[219] "Because of a woeful lack of transparency, the American people know very little about his this agreement will benefit multi-national corporations at the expense of the American worker. … Despite the lack of transparency, one can predict the impact of TPP and whose interests this deal will serve, based on who favors the agreement."[220]
In the wake of the2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis, Gabbard said the United States needed to stay out of Venezuela and not get involved in overthrowing Venezuelan PresidentNicolás Maduro. She said Venezuela, not the United States, should choose its government.[221]
Gabbard has generally supported legalabortion through the first 20 weeks of pregnancy,[222][223] though her views on abortion have changed over time.
When young, Gabbard opposed abortion. She changed her views on abortion (along with her views onLGBTQ issues) during her military experience inIraq, seeing "the destructive effect of having governments ... act as moral arbiters for their people".[145][224][182]
During her early years in Congress, Gabbard had a 100% voting record with bothPlanned Parenthood andNARAL,[225] though she supported regulating abortions during thethird trimester of pregnancy, stating onThe Rubin Report: "I think [in] the third trimester, unless a woman's life or severe health consequences is at risk, then there shouldn't be an abortion in the third trimester."[226]
On December 9, 2020, Gabbard introduced a legislative bill which sought to ensure that a health-care practitioner exercises the proper degree of care in the event that a child survives an abortion, as an amendment toTitle 18 of theUnited States Code.[227] The next day, Gabbard introduced a bill that would have prohibited all abortions after 20 weeks gestational age.[223] Neither bill was brought to the House floor for a vote.
In her full statement regarding her decision to leave the Democratic Party, Gabbard criticized the Biden administration's October 2022 arrest and indictment of several pro-life activists who had allegedly blocked access to an abortion clinic. Gabbard also criticized Vice PresidentKamala Harris and SenatorElizabeth Warren's statements on the "illegitimacy of the Supreme Court" in light of their disappointment with theDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling.[228][229]
Gabbard has been outspoken against a "broken criminal justice system" and abuse ofprivate prisons that together put "people in prison for smoking marijuana while allowing corporations" such asPurdue Pharma, "who are responsible for the opioid-related deaths of thousands …, to walk away scot-free with their coffers full. This so-called criminal justice system, which favors the rich and powerful and punishes the poor, cannot stand."[230] In December 2018, she co-sponsored theFirst Step Act as a "first in a long line of steps toward comprehensive criminal justice reform, … greater sentencing reform, and [to] eradicate the private prison industry."[231]
Gabbard has stated that resources need to be dedicated "at every level of education as well as beyond" to help people with disabilities get the jobs they need to succeed. In addition to cosponsoring several bills of importance to the disability community, she has opposed bills such as theADA Education and Reform Act[232] on the grounds it would impose undue requirements on individuals with disabilities before they could sue businesses for violating accessibility laws. She believed strongly that the bill would dismantle the ADA and voiced "strong opposition to this harmful legislation."[233]

Gabbard supports thelegalization of cannabis for recreational purposes.[234] She has stated that she has never consumed marijuana, but "believe(s) firmly in every person's freedom to make their own choices", and calls the drug "far less harmful and dangerous than alcohol".[234] Gabbard is also an advocate for themedical use of cannabis (particularly as an alternative toopioid painkillers),[234][235] stating: "The fact that marijuana'sstill a Schedule I drug is unacceptable in the harm that it is causing to the people of our country."[236]
Gabbard has introduced theEnding Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act and theMarijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act to legalize cannabis at the federal level.[237][238] She has also cosponsored numerous other cannabis-related measures including theMarijuana Justice Act.[234] In June 2020, Gabbard introduced an amendment to the House version of the2021 NDAA to allow members of Armed Services to use products containingCBD and otherhemp derivatives.[239] It passed 336 to 71 as a package, although House leaders did not fight for its inclusion in the final bill.[240]
On January 17, 2020, in response to a voter's question regarding "whether her plan to end the war on drugs centered on more harm reduction and treatment or if it involved moving to legalize and regulate narcotics so that you're no longer seeing tainted drugs on the street ... and involvement in the black market", Gabbard answered “all of the above”. Gabbard expressed support forthe Portugal model of decriminalizing and regulating all drugs, saying that "the fears and the myths and the stigma about taking that step should be set aside."[241] Gabbard allegedly planned on introducing legislation to decriminalize drug possession at the federal level, until theCOVID-19 pandemic came.[242]
Gabbard has advocated forfinancial reform since first running for Congress, including such measures as restoring theGlass-Steagall Act, breaking uptoo-big-to-fail banks, strengthening protections againstpredatory lending practices, increasingcapital requirements for the nation's largest banks, andbanning naked credit default swaps.[243][244][43]
In 2012, during her first campaign for Congress, Gabbard critiquedJPMorgan ChaseCEOJamie Dimon "and an army of Wall Street lobbyists" for having "anchored down" the process of implementingDodd-Frank legislation "to the point that half of the modest regulations included in it aren’t even in place today, including theVolcker Rule, which limits risky trading behavior." She also called for breaking up big banks (noting that the five largest control 56 percent of the U.S. economy) and for preventing banks "from becoming too big and too precarious to ever again endanger our livelihoods as they did in 2008, and as they continue to do today."[243]
In 2014, she voted forAudit the Federal Reserve legislation.[245]
In 2015, in a written statement to President Obama regarding his State of the Union message, wrote "America also needs true Wall Street reform, which begins with reinstating Glass-Steagall. The financial stability of our nation depends on serious efforts to prevent Wall Street from making risky investments at taxpayer expense. The focus must always be on the needs of Main Street; we must prevent big banks from gambling with the well-being of our nation."[246]
In 2017, Gabbard co-sponsored a bill to reinstate provisions of theGlass-Steagall Act in order to separateinvestment banking fromcommercial banking and prevent the largest banks from engaging inspeculative trading.[247][248] She urged her colleagues to oppose theFinancial CHOICE Act, a bill rolling back financial regulations put into effect after the 2008 financial crisis.[249][250] She also supported a bill to increase the hourly minimum wage to $15 by 2024.[251]
In 2018, Gabbard voted with the minority against a bill she said worked to undo state-level legislation seeking to curb maximum interest rates on loans, noting that, in Hawaii, which has no such state-level legislation, interest rates could reach an annual percentage rate (APR) of 459 percent.[248]
On July 23, 2019, Gabbard introduced the Wall Street Banker Accountability for Misconduct Act,[252] which would require Wall Street's biggest banks to establish a deferment fund funded annually by senior executives who receive compensation more than 10 times the compensation of the median paid employee of the covered bank, receive total compensation of over $1 million, and receive one of the 100 largest compensation packages, and who have authority to expose more than 0.5% of covered bank's capital. The deferred compensation would be held for 10 years to be used to pay penalties for violations occurring on their watch.[253]
During the2019-2020 coronavirus outbreak, Gabbard supported a temporary universal basic income of $1000 per month.[254] Another former candidate in the2020 presidential election campaign,Andrew Yang, had supported the universal basic income.[254]
Gabbard supports making community college tuition free for all Americans while making all four-year colleges tuition free for students with an annual family income of $125,000 or less. The tuition would be funded by a new tax on trading stocks and bonds.[145]

Gabbard received theSierra Club Hawaii Chapter's endorsement in the 2012 Democraticprimary election for Congress[255] and in her2014 reelection campaign.[256]
In December 2016, Gabbard, along with approximately 2,000 U.S. military veterans dubbed "The Veterans Stand for Standing Rock," traveled toNorth Dakota to join theprotests against the construction of the final leg of theDakota Access Pipeline near theStanding Rock andCheyenne River Indian Reservations.[257][258]
In September 2017, Gabbard introduced the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act ("OFF Act")[259] as legislation seeking to transition the United States to clean renewable energy. The bill would require electric utilities to transition to 80% renewable energy resources by 2027 and 100% renewable by 2035, while setting similar vehicle emission standards goals and banninghydraulic fracturing.[145]
In November 2018, Gabbard spoke in favor of aGreen New Deal, which was at the time a draft resolution to task a special House committee with coming up with legislation to eliminate fossil fuel use from the economy within a decade. In February 2019, she expressed concerns about the vagueness of the version of the Green New Deal proposed by RepresentativeAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez and SenatorEd Markey, saying "I do not support 'leaving the door open' to nuclear power unless and until there is a permanent solution to the problem of nuclear waste,"[260] and did not co-sponsor the legislation as a result.[261]
Gabbard successfully passed an amendment to the2019 National Defense Authorization Act that would require theDepartment of Energy to reexamine the safety of the Runit Dome, a leakingCold War era nuclear waste site in theMarshall Islands.[262] In July 2020, she called for "fresh eyes" to ensure a more independent assessment of the waste site's safety.[262]
Gabbard co-sponsored the Family Act legislation which would entitle employees to take up to 60 days of paid, job-protected leave to care for a newborn child or to care for any family member for medical reasons. She advocates foruniversal basic income which would allow one parent to either provide childcare themselves at home or to afford to pay for childcare. She also advocates for expandingpre-kindergarten education to all Americans.[263][264]
In her full announcement regarding her departure from the Democratic Party, Gabbard stated, "Today's Democratic Party does not believe in our constitutionally protected right of free speech. Fostering freedom of thought and diversity of expression is the very foundation of any flourishing democracy." She also criticized the Biden administration's creation of a Disinformation Governance Board, referring to it as a "Ministry of Truth."[229]

Gabbard's views ongun control andgun owners' rights have varied through the course of her political career.
During her time in Congress and throughout her presidential campaign, Gabbard supported a common rifle weapons ban anduniversal background checks.[265] She received an F-rating from the NRA, a 0% rating by the Hawaii Rifle Association and a 100% rating by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence for her time in Congress.[266]
Following her retirement from Congress, Gabbard's positions on gun control and gun owners' rights have shifted to the right.
Gabbard has stated that she is a supporter of theSecond Amendment. Gabbard says she believes the Second Amendment is necessary so citizens can "defend themselves and our loved ones, and to serve as a check on a tyrannical government seeking to take away our God-given freedoms."[228][229]
Gabbard expressed approval with the Supreme Court's ruling inNew York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which held that an individual's right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home is protected by the Second Amendment of theUnited States Constitution.[228][229]
In October 2024, she stated her opposition to an assault weapon ban.[267]
Gabbard supports auniversal health care plan called "Single Payer Plus".[268][269][270][271][272][273] Her plan is loosely modeled afterAustralia's healthcare system.[274] In 2017, she co-sponsored theExpanded & Improved Medicare For All Act[275][276] to create a national health insurance program that covers uninsured as well as underinsured people;[277] allows for private insurance supplemental to, but not duplicative of, benefits provided under the program; and paid for in part by raising taxes on the wealthy and taxing financial transactions.[145] Gabbard called the Republican-sponsoredAmerican Health Care Act of 2017 "really a handout to insurance and pharmaceutical companies that will further exacerbate the burden on American families."[278]
In Gabbard's view, "If you look at other countries in the world who have universal health care, every one of them has some form of a role for private insurance."[279][280] In 2019, she cosponsored House Resolution 1384, Medicare for All Act of 2019, a bill that would allow private insurance.[281][282]
Gabbard has pushed to reinstate Medicaid eligibility for people from the Marshall Islands,Micronesia andPalau who are working and living in the United States.[262]
In 2017, Gabbard cosponsored and worked toward passing the Preventing Diabetes in Medicare Act[283] to extendMedicaremedical nutrition therapy services to those with pre-diabetes or risk factors for developing type 2 diabetes so as to "help identify and treat diabetes earlier and more effectively."[284]
In 2019, Gabbard cosponsored theAffordable and Safe Prescription Drug Importation Act to allow wholesale distributors, pharmacies, and individuals to import affordable and safe drugs; the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Act[285] to allow theDepartment of Health and Human Services to negotiate directly with pharmaceutical companies underMedicare Part D; and the Prescription Drug Price Relief Act[286] to end government-granted monopolies for manufacturers that charge drug prices higher than the median prices at which the drugs are available in other countries.
Gabbard proposes addressing thehousing crisis by bipartisan efforts to usezoning andpublic–private partnerships between local governments and private developers to quickly increase the amount and reduce the price of available housing.[287]
Gabbard differs from other Democrats on some aspects of immigration. She sees the "root cause of mass immigration on our southern border" as being the "history of US military intervention in Latin America that left countries destroyed." She continues: "Before we talk about a wall, we need to end our ongoing threats of intervention – this time in Venezuela."[288] Gabbard voted with congressional Republicans in favor of "extreme vetting" of Iraqi and Syrian refugees.[289][290] Gabbard has also stated "I don’t support open borders. Without secure borders, we don’t really have a country” and that it is a "fair" criticism that other Democratic politicians had misguidedly embraced the idea of open borders.[291] In 2015, Gabbard called on the US government to give priority to persecuted minority refugees in the Middle East, such as Christians andYazidis.[292] In response to Trump's proposals tobuild a border wall with Mexico, Gabbard stated that she prefers "using high-tech surveillance at the border rather than physical wall" but that "in some places, it may make sense to have a wall or some sort of physical barrier" but would rely on experts to clarify whether extensions of physical barriers are needed.[293][294] Gabbard has also called for a temporary suspension of theVisa Waiver Program for European passport holders, citing concerns about security and terrorism following the influx of Syrian refugees into Germany, until the threat of a potential terrorist attack is removed.[295][296] However, Gabbard has also spoken in favor of easing restrictions on granting temporary work visas to immigrants, increasing skilled immigration, creating a simplified path to citizenship for illegal and undocumented immigrants who have not committed serious crimes, granting citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants and reinstatingDACA. Gabbard also believes that immigrants should be assessed as individuals and for what they can contribute rather than by their nationality and background.[297][293] During the2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, Gabbard stated "we can and should have both secure borders as well as humane immigration policies."[298] She has also called for immigration reform, describing the system as "broken."[292][299]
In 2013, Gabbard sponsored legislation to requireGMO labeling.[300][301] In 2015, she criticized theSafe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, saying it "makes a mockery of transparency and leaves U.S. consumers in the dark;"[302] and that it merely creates "an illusion of transparency, making things more difficult for consumers, not easier."[303] In 2016, she voted against a GMO-labeling bill, saying it was too weak.[304] In early February 2019, she "courageously criticized Monsanto for falsifying pesticide safety studies"[305] when she tweeted that Monsanto manufactured "'scientific studies' to influence theEPA while destroying small farmers," and unleashed "the scourge ofRoundup."[306]
Gabbard was a member of the HouseLGBT Equality Caucus, and during the116th Congress had an 84% record in Congress for pro-LGBT legislation from theHuman Rights Campaign, a group that advocates for LGBT rights.[307] During the115th Congress, she had a 100% record.[308] Gabbard's position on LGBT issues has changed over the course of her lifetime.[citation needed]
Gabbard supported her father's campaign to amend theConstitution of Hawaii to give lawmakers the power to limit marriage to same-sex couples.[309] The amendment was overwhelmingly approved by voters in a referendum.[310] As a Hawaii state legislator in 2004, Gabbard opposed and protested against Hawaii House Bill 1024, which would have established legal parity betweensame-sex couples in civil unions and married straight couples. The bill was defeated in the House.[311][312][313] Also in 2004, Gabbard opposed a House resolution to study the demographics and needs of LGBT students saying that a study asking students questions about their sexuality would be a violation of their privacy.[314]
In 2020, Gabbard introduced the Protect Women in Sports Act of 2020 to theU.S. House of Representatives, which would amendTitle IX to prevent students assigned male at birth from participating on girls’ sports teams.[315][316] In a statement, Gabbard claimed that the legislation is meant to protect "Title IX’s original intent which was based on the general biological distinction between men and women athletes based on sex.”[317]
On April 4, 2022, Gabbard endorsedFlorida House Bill 1557, popularly dubbed the "Don't Say Gay" bill, which forbids discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in public school classrooms for kindergarten through third grade. Gabbard stated the bill "bans government and government schools from indoctrinating woke sexual values in our schools to a captive audience". She also suggested the bill should apply to all grades.[318][319][320]
After two deployments with theHawaii Army National Guard to Iraq in 2004 and Kuwait in 2008, Gabbard said in 2011 that her stance onLGBT issues was changed by her experience in the military "with LGBTQ service members both here at home and while deployed"[321] as well as seeing "the destructive effect of having governments … act as moral arbiters for their people."[224][322] In 2012, Gabbard apologized for what David Knowles called "anti-gay advocacy".[323]
Since 2013, Gabbard has been a member of the HouseLGBT Equality Caucus during her first,[324] third,[325] and fourth[326] terms in Congress. As Congresswoman, Gabbard co-sponsored pro-LGBT legislation, signed anamicus brief supportingEdith Windsor's challenge to theDefense of Marriage Act, and supported theEquality Act to protect LGBT individuals, and other efforts to promote LGBT equality, including supporting the Restore Honor to Service Members Act,[327] theEmployment Non-Discrimination Act, theSafe Schools Improvement Act and theEquality for All Resolution.[309][224] During a 2016 interview, while saying that her opinions on gay rights as a policy have changed, her personal views on gay people had not.[328] In 2019, after launching her presidential campaign, she apologized again for her past anti-gay policy positions.[329]
In May 2016, Gabbard, citing aLos Angeles Times investigation into the manufacturer ofOxyContin, called drug company marketing of painkillers "the root cause of the problems", as they were selling Oxycontin as a 12-hour drug while it wore off early in many patients, increasing the risk of addiction.[330]
In May 2018 Gabbard, Senator Bernie Sanders, and RepresentativesRo Khanna andPramila Jayapal introduced The Opioid Crisis Accountability Act of 2018[331] "to penalize drug companies found to be profiting from the opioid epidemic [targeting] companies that engage in false marketing or distribution of opioids."[332]
Gabbard has criticized the "defund the police" movement for "demonizing law enforcement." She has argued that many prosecutors and defense attorneys are too lenient on criminals at the expense of law-abiding citizens.[228][229]
On March 7, 2019, Gabbard toldBuzzFeed News, "If a consenting adult wants to engage in sex work, that is their right, and it should not be a crime." She continued, "All people should have autonomy over their bodies and their labor." A spokesperson for her presidential campaign cited that comment later that month and added, "She believes it should be decriminalized, and that is the action we would take on the federal level."[333]
In February 2020, she echoed the same words in a statement toReason.[334] The sex worker advocacy groupDecriminalize Sex Work gave her a grade of A− on sex work decriminalization, making her only presidential candidate to get a score above a B−.[335][334]
According toPolitico, Gabbard supports eliminating cuts incorporate income taxes for "offshoring", but has taken no positions oncapital gains taxes,tax credits,Wall Street taxes, andwealth taxes.[336]
Gabbard has called for breaking up "big tech companies" who, together with "overreaching intel agencies", she says "take away our civil liberties and freedoms in the name of national security and corporate greed".[337] She supportsnet neutrality, and has criticizedFacebook for banning users.[338] In Gabbard'slawsuit against Google for temporarily suspending her campaign's advertisement account,[339] her lawyers contended that Google should be considered a "state actor" and that Google's program to verify election ads amounts to a regulation of political speech, thereby violating theFirst Amendment.[340]
In 2014, Gabbard introduced the Access to Care and Treatment Now for Veterans Act[341] to allow veterans not getting timely healthcare from the VA to get care from non-VA medical providers. This bill was incorporated into theVeterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act passed later that year.[342]
On March 19, 2015, Gabbard and Scott Perry (R-Pa.) launched a new congressional caucus dedicated to helping post-9/11 veterans in transition to civilian life and improve services for veterans such as reducing the backlog inVeteran Affairs disability claims, and promoting education, entrepreneurship and employment opportunities.[343]
Also in 2015, Gabbard introduced legislation withChris Stewart (UT-02) to expand veterans’ healthcare options by allowing them to pause theirTRICARE benefits to participate in an employer'sHealth Savings Account (HSA) program.[344][345][346]
In 2016, Gabbard worked successfully withJohn Kline (R-MN) to amend theNational Defense Authorization Act to allow military retirees living more than 100 miles from a military treatment facility to re-enroll inTricare Prime, reversing a 2013 policy that eliminated such access.[347][348]
In 2017, Gabbard, as co-chair of the Post 9/11 Veterans Caucus[349] helped introduce the Forever GI Bill to extend and improve theGI Bill benefits granted to veterans, surviving spouses, and dependents.[350] The bill passed with bipartisan support.
In January 2019, together withRep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), she introduced the Retired Pay Restoration Act[351] to ensure disabled veterans receiving 40 percent or lower rates of service-connected disability would receive both their military pension as well as Veterans Affairs’ disability compensation or combat-related special pay. As founder and co-chair of the Post-9/11 Veterans Caucus,[349] she said: "Retirement benefits and disability benefits are two different things, and one should not be counted against the other" and that this bipartisan legislation will "ensure that our veterans receive the benefits they’ve earned and deserve."[352]
Gabbard says, addressing sexual harassment at the workplace requires leadership to bring about a culture shift in the private and public sectors. She was an original cosponsor of the Military Justice Improvement Act[353] to transfer decision-making in military sexual assault cases from the chain of command to experienced trial counsel to determine the appropriate trial path to pursue.[263][264]
She has also cosponsored: the Congressional Accountability and Hush Fund Elimination Act[354] to that ensure congressional perpetrators are held personally and financially accountable for sexual harassment abuses of power by ending taxpayer-funded harassment settlements and requiring full reimbursement to the Treasury for past settlements; the Power Act[355] which requires every state's U.S. attorney to promote and expand pro-bono legal services, specifically for domestic violence survivors; and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2018[356] to revise and reauthorize various programs and activities to prevent and respond to domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, and stalking.[263][264]
To close the wage gap between women and men, Gabbard co-sponsored thePaycheck Fairness Act.[357][263][264]
Gabbard calls for a concerted effort to encourage the professional development and opportunities of women in the workplace, government and military. She opposes policies that would dictate the demographics of corporate boards.[263][264]
Gabbard has supportedcampaign finance reform,[358] and theFinancial Times describes it as one of her signature issues.[359] She is opposed to the influence ofSuper PACs in politics,[360] and stated that, "Politicians must represent and listen to the people who elected them to serve — not whatever lobbyist writes them the biggest check."[358]
In December 2016, Gabbard co-sponsored theWe the People Amendment, which proposes anamendment to theConstitution that would abolishcorporate personhood and would hold that campaign contributions would not be protected under the First Amendment.[361][362]
In May 2017, Gabbard pledged to no longer accept money frompolitical action committees (PACs).[363] In July 2017 Gabbard was one of only seven members of the No PACCaucus.[364] In October 2018The Intercept reported that Gabbard was one of only four members of Congress who had pledged not to accept corporate campaign donations.[365]
In February 2018, Gabbard gave closing remarks at theUnrig the System Summit ofRepresentUs, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that advocates for state and local laws based on model legislation called theAmerican Anti-Corruption Act. Gabbard lamented the influence of big money in politics: "Getting to the heart of how corrosive an effect money has on our politics and really regaining that voice and trust and confidence of the people, that’s how we begin to get back to a government of, by, and for the people."[366]
Gabbard is an original member of the bi-partisan4th Amendment Caucus. As Gabbard notes, "Our laws regarding freedom, privacy, and civil liberties have not kept up with the rapid expansion of technology in today's digital age." The caucus aims to protect against warrantless searches and seizures, close privacy violating surveillance loopholes, and champion reform efforts to protect and restore Fourth Amendment rights.[367]
In 2014 remarks on anNSA phone data mining bill, Gabbard said: "We still have yet to hear of a single example of how national security has been strengthened by allowing bulk data collection."[368]
In 2015, Gabbard spearheaded, together withRon Wyden (D-OR),[369] and co-sponsored by Trey Gowdy (R-SC-4) andTom Udall (D-NM), the Strengthening Privacy, Oversight, and Transparency (SPOT) Act[370] to as Udall stated, "strengthen the independent Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB)" and "significantly improve the oversight and accountability of the nation's intelligence community to protect Americans' constitutional rights."[371]
On January 29, 2019, Gabbard was awarded an 'A+' rating "as a champion for protecting a free and open internet and civil liberties" fromRestore The Fourth andFight for the Future, "recogniz[ing] the congresswoman’s strong record of opposing mass surveillance and the warrantless collection of Americans’ calls, emails, texts and other communications, support of civil liberties and the USA Rights amendment and more."[372] Gabbard said "It is unfortunate that some leaders in Washington claim that the American people must choose between our national security, and our civil liberties. This is a false choice. We must ensure that our laws and policies strike the appropriate balance – protecting our national security, while simultaneously ensuring the constitutional rights of Americans are upheld."[373]
In January 2025, Gabbard reversed her opposition toFISA 702, which she had previously voted against the reauthorization of in 2020.[374]
Gabbard introduced the Securing America's Elections Act of 2018[375] to require voter-verified paper ballots in federal elections in case of any audit or recount, allow voters to verify and correct any errors before their permanent paper ballot is preserved for official government record; and establish voter-verified paper ballots as the correct record of votes cast if there were any inconsistencies or irregularities between electronic and paper vote tallies.[376]
Gabbard says the "Washington bubble is disconnected" from the people in the country.[377] During a January 2020 interview with a newspaper's editor board, she criticized her party and thecable news media. Gabbard stated that the Democratic party "unfortunately has become more and more out of touch" with people across the country, and that the party needs to listen to the concerns of ordinary voters. She called for the Democratic party to renounce the influence of lobbyists for the fossil-fuel industry, military contractors and other giant corporations to trigger a shift in foreign and domestic priorities of the United States. She warned, theimpeachment of President Trump could prevent this shift in priorities and could lead to Republican wins of House, Senate and presidency in 2020. Gabbard said, voters "feel a sense of great frustration" that their opinions and everyday concerns are "not at all reflected" in the cable news media.[378] She introduced legislation to reinstate theFairness Doctrine,[379] a policy that required media outlets to present contrasting views on any political or social issue.[380][381]
On October 12, 2022, Gabbard announced her decision to leave the Democratic Party, stating that, "I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue and stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms, are hostile to people of faith and spirituality, demonize the police and protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders, weaponize the national security state to go after political opponents, and above all, dragging us ever closer to nuclear war."[382][229][228]
Gabbard has stated the U.S. government should drop charges against WikiLeaks founderJulian Assange: "[H]is arrest and all … that just went down … poses a great threat to our freedom of the press and to our freedom of speech"[383] She has also expressed concerns that "our government … can basically create this climate of fear against … those … publishing things that they don't like …. This … threatens every American — the message … we are getting is 'Be quiet, toe the line, otherwise there will be consequences.'"[384]
She would also pardon NSA whistleblowerEdward Snowden and take action to "close the loopholes" in the law Snowden exposed. Of Snowden andChelsea Manning, she said, "there is not an actual channel for whistle-blowers like them to bring forward information that exposes egregious abuses of our constitutional rights and liberties, period. There was not a channel for that to happen in a real way, and that's why they ended up taking the path that they did, and suffering the consequences."[383]
In October 2020, Gabbard introduced two bipartisan resolutions in the House of Representatives to pardon and drop all charges against Edward Snowden and Julian Assange respectively.[385] She also introduced a bill to reform theEspionage Act—HR8452 ("Protect Brave Whistleblowers Act")—which was supported byDaniel Ellsberg, best known for leaking the Pentagon Papers.[386][387]
In November 2020, Gabbard called forPresidentDonald Trump to pardon Snowden and Assange.[388]
On November 21, 2016, Gabbard became the second Democrat (afterMichelle Rhee) to meet with President-electDonald Trump and his transition team atTrump Tower.[389] She described the meeting as "frank and positive" and said she accepted the meeting to influence Trump before Republicans grew in influence and escalated the war to overthrow the Syrian government.[390] She later called the Trump administration's2017 Shayrat missile strike reckless and "short-sighted."[199]
Gabbard did not join the 169 congressional Democrats who signed a letter of opposition toSteve Bannon's appointment as Trump's chief strategist,[391][392] but she joined 182 other colleagues to co-sponsor a bill to remove him from theNational Security Council.[393]
Gabbard vehemently criticized the2017 United States–Saudi Arabia arms deal[144][394] and the administration's decision not to sanction Saudi Arabia over themurder of Jamal Khashoggi.[148]
In an October 29, 2019 press conference with family members of victims of theSeptember 11, 2001 terror attacks, Gabbard requested the Trump administration todeclassify the findings of its investigation into a possible involvement of Saudi Arabia government officials in the September 11 attacks and to end all aid for Saudi Arabia until this information is made public.[149][150] Gabbard reintroduced House resolution 663 from 2017[395] as resolution 662[396] to push for this goal.[397][398]
Gabbard voted "present" when the House of Representatives voted toimpeach President Trump in December 2019, saying, "I could not in good conscience vote against impeachment because I believe President Trump is guilty of wrongdoing. I could not in good conscience vote for impeachment because removal of a sitting president must not be the culmination of a partisan process, fueled by tribal animosities that have so gravely divided our country."[399]
She explained the motivation for her "present" vote in two video messages[400][401] and a press release. Gabbard citedThe Federalist Papers essay No. 69[402] and described her vote as a protest against a politicalzero-sum game where both parties "aim to extract maximum hurt from their opponent, but everybody loses and nothing gets done." She said she felt the impeachment process had become a partisan endeavor. Gabbard criticized Republicans for "blindly supporting their party leader and abdicating their responsibility to exercise legitimate oversight" and she criticized Democrats for using "extreme rhetoric that was never conducive to an impartial fact-finding process". She called for "reconciliation of the divided nation".[403] Gabbard introduced House resolution H.Res.766[404][405] that would censure President Trump for several of his foreign policy decisions and "send a strong message to this president and future presidents that their abuses of power will not go unchecked, while leaving the question of removing Trump from office to the voters to decide."[406]
A week after voting, Gabbard said she thought the impeachment of President Trump would embolden him, increase the likelihood of his reelection, and cause her serious concern about her party losing thepresidential election and the majority in the House of Representatives.[407]
when it comes to the war against terrorists, I'm a hawk. When it comes to counterproductive wars of regime change, I'm a dove.. a staunch supporter of the United States' counter-ISIS campaign
The jury is still out on this report. [...] Clearly we would not like to see any human, any person around the world being treated inhumanely. On the other side, I can understand that any of us, if we were in a situation where our family, our community, our state, or our country is in a place where, let's say, in an hour, a nuclear bomb or an attack will go off unless this information was found, I believe that if I were the president of the United States that I would do everything in my power to keep the American people safe.
Saudi Arabia continues to spend billions of dollars funding the spread of the Wahhabi Salafist ideology that fuels groups like ISIS, al Qaeda and other jihadist groups around the world. The U.S. must stop arming Saudi Arabia, stop fueling this fire and hold Saudi Arabia accountable for their actions.
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: others (link)A successful prosecution of Assad (at the International Criminal Court) will require collection of evidence from the scene of the incident, and I support the United Nation's efforts in this regard. Without such evidence, a successful prosecution is impossible.
Hawaii Army National Guard, 2003-2020, Major; US Army Reserve, 2020-present, Lieutenant Colonel
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: others (link)She's known as an environmentalist and a proponent of women's reproductive rights.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)