Plutinos form the inner part of theKuiper belt and represent about a quarter of the knownKuiper belt objects. They are also the most populous known class ofresonant trans-Neptunian objects(also see adjunct box with hierarchical listing). The first plutino after Pluto itself,(385185) 1993 RO, was discovered on September 16, 1993.
It is thought that the objects that are currently in meanorbital resonances with Neptune initially followed a variety of independent heliocentric paths. As Neptune migrated outward early in the Solar System's history (seeorigins of the Kuiper belt), the bodies it approached would have been scattered; during this process, some of them would have been captured into resonances.[1] The 3:2 resonance is a low-order resonance and is thus the strongest and most stable among all resonances.[2] This is the primary reason it has a larger population than the other Neptunian resonances encountered in the Kuiper Belt. The cloud of low-inclination bodies beyond 40AU is thecubewano family, while bodies with highereccentricities (0.05 to 0.34) andsemi-major axes close to the 3:2 Neptune resonance are primarily plutinos.[3]
The distribution of Plutinos, and relative sizes, drawn 1 million times larger.
While the majority of plutinos have relatively loworbital inclinations, a significant fraction of these objects follow orbits similar to that of Pluto, with inclinations in the 10–25° range and eccentricities around 0.2–0.25; such orbits result in many of these objects havingperihelia close to or even inside Neptune's orbit, while simultaneously havingaphelia that bring them close to the mainKuiper belt's outer edge (where objects in a 1:2 resonance with Neptune, the twotinos, are found).
The orbital periods of plutinos cluster around 247.3 years (1.5 × Neptune's orbital period), varying by at most a few years from this value.
Unusual plutinos include:
2005 TV189, which follows the most highly inclined orbit (34.5°)
(15875) 1996 TP66, which has the most elliptical orbit (its eccentricity is 0.33), with the perihelion halfway between Uranus and Neptune
Pluto's influence on the other plutinos has historically been neglected due to its relatively small mass. However, the resonance width (the range of semi-axes compatible with the resonance) is very narrow and only a few times larger than Pluto'sHill sphere (gravitational influence). Consequently, depending on the original eccentricity, some plutinos will eventually be driven out of the resonance byinteractions with Pluto.[5] Numerical simulations suggest that the orbits of plutinos with an eccentricity 10%–30% smaller or larger than that of Pluto are not stable over billion-year timescales.[6]
The motions ofOrcus andPluto in arotating frame with a period equal toNeptune'sorbital period (holding Neptune stationary). Pluto is grey, Orcus is red, and Neptune is the white (stationary) dot at 5 o'clock. Uranus is blue, Saturn yellow, and Jupiter red.
Orbits and sizes of the larger plutinos (and the reference non-plutino2002 KX14). Orbitaleccentricity is represented by segments extending horizontally fromperihelion toaphelion;inclination is shown on the vertical axis.
The distribution of plutinos (and the reference non-plutino2002 KX14). Small inserts showhistograms for the distributions of orbital inclination and eccentricity.
D.Jewitt, A.DelsantiThe Solar System Beyond The Planets inSolar System Update : Topical and Timely Reviews in Solar System Sciences, Springer-Praxis Ed.,ISBN3-540-26056-0 (2006).Preprint of the article (pdf)
Bernstein G.M., Trilling D.E., Allen R.L., Brown K.E, Holman M., Malhotra R.The size Distribution of transneptunian bodies. The Astronomical Journal,128, 1364–1390.preprint on arXiv
Minor Planet Center Orbit database (MPCORB) as of 2008-10-05.
Minor Planet Circular 2008-S05 (October 2008)Distant Minor planets was used for orbit classification.