Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Photosynthesis

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Biological process to convert light into chemical energy

Schematic of photosynthesis in plants. Thecarbohydrates produced are stored in or used by the plant.
Composite image showing the global distribution of photosynthesis, including both oceanicphytoplankton and terrestrialvegetation. Dark red and blue-green indicate regions of high photosynthetic activity in the ocean and on land, respectively.

Photosynthesis (/ˌftəˈsɪnθəsɪs/FOH-tə-SINTH-ə-sis)[1] is asystem ofbiological processes by whichphotopigment-bearingautotrophicorganisms, such as mostplants,algae andcyanobacteria, convertlight energy — typically fromsunlight — into thechemical energy necessary to fuel theirmetabolism. The termphotosynthesis usually refers tooxygenic photosynthesis, a process that releasesoxygen as abyproduct ofwater splitting. Photosynthetic organisms store the converted chemical energy within thebonds of intracellularorganic compounds (complexcompounds containingcarbon), typicallycarbohydrates likesugars (mainlyglucose,fructose andsucrose),starches,phytoglycogen andcellulose. When needing to use this stored energy, an organism's cells then metabolize the organic compounds throughcellular respiration. Photosynthesis plays a critical role in producing and maintaining theoxygen content of theEarth's atmosphere, and it supplies most of thebiological energy necessary forcomplex life onEarth.[2]

Some organisms also performanoxygenic photosynthesis, which does not produce oxygen. Somebacteria (e.g.purple bacteria) usesbacteriochlorophyll to splithydrogen sulfide as areductant instead ofwater, releasingsulfur instead of oxygen, which was a dominant form of photosynthesis in theeuxinicCanfield oceans during theBoring Billion.[3][4]Archaea such asHalobacterium also perform a type of non-carbon-fixing anoxygenic photosynthesis, where the simpler photopigmentretinal and itsmicrobial rhodopsinderivatives are used to absorb green light and produce a proton (hydron)gradient across thecell membrane, and the subsequention movement powerstransmembraneproton pumps to directly synthesizeadenosine triphosphate (ATP), the "energy currency" of cells. Such archaeal photosynthesis might have been the earliest form of photosynthesis that evolved on Earth, as far back as thePaleoarchean, preceding that ofcyanobacteria (seePurple Earth hypothesis).[5]

While the details may differ betweenspecies, the process always begins when light energy is absorbed by thereaction centers, proteins that containphotosynthetic pigments orchromophores. In plants, these pigments arechlorophylls (aporphyrin derivative that absorbs the red and bluespectra of light, thus reflecting green) held insidechloroplasts, abundant inleaf cells. In cyanobacteria, they are embedded in theplasma membrane. In these light-dependent reactions, some energy is used to stripelectrons from suitable substances, such as water, producing oxygen gas. Thehydrogen freed by the splitting of water is used in the creation of two important molecules that participate in energetic processes: reducednicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and ATP.

In plants,algae, andcyanobacteria, sugars are synthesized by a subsequent sequence oflight-independent reactions called theCalvin cycle. In this process, atmospheric carbon dioxide is incorporated into already existing organic compounds, such asribulose bisphosphate (RuBP).[6] Using the ATP and NADPH produced by the light-dependent reactions, the resulting compounds are thenreduced and removed to form further carbohydrates, such asglucose. In other bacteria, different mechanisms like thereverse Krebs cycle are used to achieve the same end.

The first photosynthetic organisms probablyevolved early in theevolutionary history of life usingreducing agents such as hydrogen or hydrogen sulfide, rather than water, as sources of electrons.[7] Cyanobacteria appeared later; theexcess oxygen they produced contributed directly to theoxygenation of the Earth,[8] which rendered the evolution of complex life possible. The average rate of energy captured by global photosynthesis is approximately 130terawatts,[9][10][11] which is about eight times the totalpower consumption of human civilization.[12] Photosynthetic organisms also convert around 100–115 billiontons (91–104 Pgpetagrams, or billions of metric tons), of carbon intobiomass per year.[13][14] Photosynthesis was discovered in 1779 byJan Ingenhousz who showed that plants need light, not just soil and water.

Overview

Main article:Biological carbon fixation
Photosynthesis changes sunlight into chemical energy, splits water to liberate O2, and fixes CO2 into sugar.

Most photosynthetic organisms arephotoautotrophs, which means that they are able tosynthesize food directly fromcarbon dioxide andwater usingenergy from light. However, not all organisms use carbon dioxide as a source of carbon atoms to carry out photosynthesis;photoheterotrophs use organic compounds, rather than carbon dioxide, as a source of carbon.[2]

Inplants,algae, andcyanobacteria, photosynthesis releases oxygen. Thisoxygenic photosynthesis is by far the most common type of photosynthesis used by living organisms. Some shade-loving plants (sciophytes) produce such low levels of oxygen during photosynthesis that they use all of it themselves instead of releasing it to the atmosphere.[15]

Although there are some differences between oxygenic photosynthesis in plants, algae, and cyanobacteria, the overall process is quite similar in these organisms. There are also many varieties ofanoxygenic photosynthesis, used mostly by bacteria, which consume carbon dioxide but do not release oxygen or which produce elemental sulfur instead of molecular oxygen.[16][17]

Carbon dioxide is converted into sugars in a process calledcarbon fixation; photosynthesis captures energy from sunlight to convert carbon dioxide intocarbohydrates. Carbon fixation is anendothermicredox reaction. In general outline, photosynthesis is the opposite ofcellular respiration: while photosynthesis is a process of reduction of carbon dioxide to carbohydrates, cellular respiration is the oxidation of carbohydrates or othernutrients to carbon dioxide. Nutrients used in cellular respiration include carbohydrates, amino acids and fatty acids. These nutrients are oxidized to produce carbon dioxide and water, and to release chemical energy to drive the organism'smetabolism.

Photosynthesis and cellular respiration are distinct processes, as they take place through different sequences of chemical reactions and in differentcellular compartments (cellular respiration inmitochondria).[18][19]

The generalequation for photosynthesis as first proposed byCornelis van Niel is:[20]

CO2carbon
dioxide
+2H2Aelectron donor +photonslight energy[CH2O]carbohydrate +2Aoxidized
electron
donor
+H2Owater

Since water is used as the electron donor in oxygenic photosynthesis, the equation for this process is:

CO2carbon
dioxide
+2H2Owater +photonslight energy[CH2O]carbohydrate +O2oxygen +H2Owater

This equation emphasizes that water is both a reactant in thelight-dependent reaction and a product of thelight-independent reaction, but cancelingn water molecules from each side gives the net equation:

CO2carbon
dioxide
+H2O water +photonslight energy[CH2O]carbohydrate +O2 oxygen

Other processes substitute other compounds (such asarsenite) for water in the electron-supply role; for example some microbes use sunlight to oxidize arsenite toarsenate:[21] The equation for this reaction is:

CO2carbon
dioxide
+(AsO3−
3
)

arsenite
+photonslight energy(AsO3−
4
)

arsenate
+COcarbon
monoxide
(used to build other compounds in subsequent reactions)[22]

Photosynthesis occurs in two stages. In the first stage,light-dependent reactions orlight reactions capture the energy of light and use it to make the hydrogen carrierNADPH and the energy-storage moleculeATP. During the second stage, thelight-independent reactions use these products to capture and reduce carbon dioxide.

Most organisms that use oxygenic photosynthesis usevisible light for the light-dependent reactions, although at least three use shortwaveinfrared or, more specifically, far-red radiation.[23]

Some organisms employ even more radical variants of photosynthesis. Somearchaea use a simpler method that employs a pigment similar to those used for vision in animals. Thebacteriorhodopsin changes its configuration in response to sunlight, acting as a proton pump. This produces a proton gradient more directly, which is then converted to chemical energy. The process does not involve carbon dioxide fixation and does not release oxygen, and seems to have evolved separately from the more common types of photosynthesis.[24]

Photosynthetic membranes and organelles

Main articles:Chloroplast andThylakoid
Chloroplast ultrastructure:
  1. outer membrane
  2. intermembrane space
  3. inner membrane (1+2+3: envelope)
  4. stroma (aqueous fluid)
  5. thylakoid lumen (inside of thylakoid)
  6. thylakoid membrane
  7. granum (stack of thylakoids)
  8. thylakoid (lamella)
  9. starch
  10. ribosome
  11. plastidial DNA
  12. plastoglobule (drop of lipids)

In photosynthetic bacteria, the proteins that gather light for photosynthesis are embedded incell membranes. In its simplest form, this involves the membrane surrounding the cell itself.[25] However, the membrane may be tightly folded into cylindrical sheets calledthylakoids,[26] or bunched up into roundvesicles calledintracytoplasmic membranes.[27] These structures can fill most of the interior of a cell, giving the membrane a very large surface area and therefore increasing the amount of light that the bacteria can absorb.[26]

In plants and algae, photosynthesis takes place inorganelles calledchloroplasts. A typicalplant cell contains about 10 to 100 chloroplasts. The chloroplast is enclosed by a membrane. This membrane is composed of a phospholipid inner membrane, a phospholipid outer membrane, and an intermembrane space. Enclosed by the membrane is an aqueous fluid called the stroma. Embedded within the stroma are stacks of thylakoids (grana), which are the site of photosynthesis. The thylakoids appear as flattened disks. The thylakoid itself is enclosed by the thylakoid membrane, and within the enclosed volume is a lumen or thylakoid space. Embedded in the thylakoid membrane are integral andperipheral membrane protein complexes of the photosynthetic system.

Plants absorb light primarily using thepigmentchlorophyll. The green part of the light spectrum is not absorbed but is reflected, which is the reason that most plants have a green color. Besides chlorophyll, plants also use pigments such ascarotenes andxanthophylls.[28] Algae also use chlorophyll, but various other pigments are present, such asphycocyanin,carotenes, andxanthophylls ingreen algae,phycoerythrin inred algae (rhodophytes) andfucoxanthin inbrown algae anddiatoms resulting in a wide variety of colors.

These pigments are embedded in plants and algae in complexes called antenna proteins. In such proteins, the pigments are arranged to work together. Such a combination of proteins is also called alight-harvesting complex.[29]

Although all cells in the green parts of a plant have chloroplasts, the majority of those are found in specially adapted structures calledleaves. Certain species adapted to conditions of strong sunlight andaridity, such as manyEuphorbia andcactus species, have their main photosynthetic organs in their stems. The cells in the interior tissues of a leaf, called themesophyll, can contain between 450,000 and 800,000 chloroplasts for every square millimeter of leaf. The surface of the leaf is coated with a water-resistantwaxycuticle that protects the leaf from excessiveevaporation of water and decreases the absorption ofultraviolet orbluelight to minimizeheating. The transparentepidermis layer allows light to pass through to thepalisade mesophyll cells where most of the photosynthesis takes place.

Light-dependent reactions

Main article:Light-dependent reactions
Light-dependent reactions of photosynthesis at the thylakoid membrane

In thelight-dependent reactions, onemolecule of the pigmentchlorophyll absorbs onephoton and loses oneelectron. This electron is taken up by a modified form of chlorophyll calledpheophytin, which passes the electron to aquinone molecule, starting the flow of electrons down anelectron transport chain that leads to the ultimatereduction ofNADP toNADPH. In addition, this creates aproton gradient (energy gradient) across thechloroplast membrane, which is used byATP synthase in the synthesis ofATP. The chlorophyll molecule ultimately regains the electron it lost when awater molecule is split in a process calledphotolysis, which releasesoxygen.

The overall equation for the light-dependent reactions under the conditions of non-cyclic electron flow in green plants is:[30]

2 H2O + 2 NADP+ + 3 ADP + 3 Pi + light → 2 NADPH + 2 H+ + 3 ATP + O2

Not allwavelengths oflight can support photosynthesis. The photosyntheticaction spectrum depends on the type ofaccessory pigments present. For example, ingreen plants, the action spectrum resembles theabsorption spectrum forchlorophylls andcarotenoids with absorption peaks in violet-blue and red light. Inred algae, the action spectrum is blue-green light, which allows thesealgae to use the blue end of the spectrum to grow in the deeper waters that filter out the longer wavelengths (red light) used by above-ground green plants. The non-absorbed part of thelight spectrum is what givesphotosynthetic organisms theircolor (e.g., green plants, red algae,purple bacteria) and is the least effective for photosynthesis in the respectiveorganisms.

Z scheme

The "Z scheme"

Inplants,light-dependent reactions occur in thethylakoid membranes of thechloroplasts where they drive the synthesis ofATP andNADPH. The light-dependent reactions are of two forms:cyclic and non-cyclic.

In the non-cyclic reaction, the photons are captured in the light-harvestingantenna complexes ofphotosystem II bychlorophyll and otheraccessory pigments (see diagram "Z-scheme"). The absorption of a photon by the antenna complex loosens an electron by a process calledphotoinduced charge separation. The antenna system is at the core of thechlorophyll molecule of the photosystem II reaction center. That loosened electron is taken up by the primaryelectron-acceptor molecule,pheophytin. As the electrons are shuttled through anelectron transport chain (the so-calledZ-scheme shown in the diagram), achemiosmotic potential is generated by pumpingproton cations (H+) across themembrane and into thethylakoid space. An ATP synthaseenzyme uses thatchemiosmotic potential to make ATP duringphotophosphorylation, whereasNADPH is a product of the terminalredox reaction in theZ-scheme. The electron enters a chlorophyllmolecule inPhotosystem I. There it is further excited by thelight absorbed by thatphotosystem. The electron is then passed along a chain ofelectron acceptors to which it transfers some of itsenergy. The energy delivered to the electron acceptors is used to movehydrogen ions across the thylakoid membrane into thelumen. The electron is eventually used toreduce the coenzymeNADP with anH+ to NADPH (which has functions in the light-independent reaction); at that point, the path of that electron ends.

The cyclic reaction is similar to that of the non-cyclic but differs in that it generates only ATP, and no reduced NADP (NADPH) is created. The cyclic reaction takes place only at photosystem I. Once the electron is displaced from the photosystem, the electron is passed down the electron acceptor molecules and returns to photosystem I, from where it was emitted, hence the namecyclic reaction.

Water photolysis

Main articles:Photodissociation andOxygen evolution

Linear electron transport through a photosystem will leave thereaction center of that photosystemoxidized. Elevating another electron will first require re-reduction of the reaction center. The excited electrons lost from the reaction center (P700) ofphotosystem I are replaced by transfer fromplastocyanin, whose electrons come from electron transport throughphotosystem II. Photosystem II, as the first step of theZ-scheme, requires an external source of electrons to reduce its oxidizedchlorophylla reaction center. The source of electrons for photosynthesis in green plants andcyanobacteria is water. Two water molecules are oxidized by the energy of four successive charge-separation reactions of photosystem II to yield a molecule ofdiatomic oxygen and fourhydrogen ions. The electrons yielded are transferred to a redox-activetyrosine residue that is oxidized by the energy ofP680+. This resets the ability of P680 to absorb another photon and release anotherphoto-dissociated electron. The oxidation of water iscatalyzed in photosystem II by a redox-active structure that contains fourmanganese ions and acalcium ion; thisoxygen-evolving complex binds twowater molecules and contains the four oxidizing equivalents that are used to drive the water-oxidizing reaction (Kok's S-state diagrams). The hydrogen ions are released in thethylakoid lumen and therefore contribute to the transmembrane chemiosmotic potential that leads toATP synthesis. Oxygen is awaste product of light-dependent reactions, but the majority of organisms onEarth use oxygen and its energy forcellular respiration, includingphotosynthetic organisms.[31][32]

Light-independent reactions

Calvin cycle

Main articles:Calvin cycle andCarbon fixation

In thelight-independent (or "dark") reactions, the enzymeRuBisCO capturesCO2 from theatmosphere and, in aprocess called theCalvin cycle, uses the newly formedNADPH and releasesthree-carbon sugars, which are latercombined to formsucrose andstarch. The overall equation for the light-independent reactions ingreen plants is[30]: 128 

3 CO2 + 9 ATP + 6 NADPH + 6 H+ → C3H6O3-phosphate + 9 ADP + 8 Pi + 6 NADP+ + 3 H2O
Overview of the Calvin cycle andcarbon fixation

Carbon fixation produces thethree-carbon sugar intermediate, which is then converted into the finalcarbohydrate products. Thesimple carbon sugars photosynthesis produces are then used to form otherorganic compounds, such as the building materialcellulose, theprecursors forlipid andamino acid biosynthesis, or as a fuel incellular respiration. The latter occurs not only inplants but also inanimals when thecarbon andenergy from plants is passed through afood chain.

Thefixation orreduction ofcarbon dioxide is a process in which carbon dioxide combines with afive-carbon sugar,ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate, toyield twomolecules of a three-carbon compound,glycerate 3-phosphate, also known as 3-phosphoglycerate. Glycerate 3-phosphate, in the presence ofATP andNADPH produced during the light-dependent stages, is reduced toglyceraldehyde 3-phosphate. Thisproduct is also referred to as 3-phosphoglyceraldehyde (PGAL) or, more generically, astriose phosphate. Most (five out of six molecules) of the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate produced are used to regenerate ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate so the process can continue. The triose phosphates not thus "recycled" often condense to formhexose phosphates, which ultimately yieldsucrose,starch, andcellulose, as well asglucose andfructose. Thesugars produced during carbonmetabolism yieldcarbon skeletons that can be used for othermetabolic reactions like the production ofamino acids andlipids.

Carbon concentrating mechanisms

On land

Main articles:C4 carbon fixation,CAM photosynthesis, andAlarm photosynthesis
Overview ofC4 carbon fixation. (This image mistakenly showslactic acid instead ofpyruvate, and all thespecies ending in "-ate" are shown as unionized acids, such asmalic acid and so on).

Inhot and dry conditions, plants close theirstomata to prevent water loss. Under these conditions, CO2 will decrease and oxygengas, produced by thelight reactions of photosynthesis, will increase, causing an increase ofphotorespiration by theoxygenase activity ofribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) and decrease in carbon fixation. Some plants haveevolved mechanisms to increase the CO2 concentration in the leaves under these conditions.[33]

Plants that use theC4 carbon fixation process chemically fix carbon dioxide in thecells of themesophyll by adding it to the three-carbon moleculephosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), a reactioncatalyzed by anenzyme calledPEP carboxylase, creating the four-carbon organic acidoxaloacetic acid. Oxaloacetic acid ormalate synthesized by this process is thentranslocated to specializedbundle sheath cells where the enzymeRuBisCO and other Calvin cycle enzymes are located, and where CO2 released bydecarboxylation of the four-carbon acids is then fixed by RuBisCO activity to the three-carbon3-phosphoglyceric acids. The physical separation of RuBisCO from the oxygen-generating light reactions reduces photorespiration and increases CO2 fixation and, thus, thephotosynthetic capacity of theleaf.[34]C4 plants can produce more sugar thanC3 plants in conditions of high light andtemperature. Many importantcrop plants are C4 plants, includingmaize,sorghum,sugarcane, andmillet. Plants that do not use PEP-carboxylase in carbon fixation are called C3 plants because the primarycarboxylation reaction, catalyzed by RuBisCO, produces the three-carbon 3-phosphoglyceric acids directly in theCalvin-Benson cycle. Over 90% of plants use C3 carbon fixation, compared to 3% that use C4 carbon fixation;[35] however, the evolution of C4 in over sixty plant lineages makes it a striking example ofconvergent evolution.[33]C2 photosynthesis, which involves carbon-concentration by selective breakdown of photorespiratory glycine, is both an evolutionary precursor to C4 and a usefulcarbon-concentrating mechanism in its own right.[36]

Xerophytes, such ascacti and mostsucculents, also use PEP carboxylase to capture carbon dioxide in a process calledCrassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). In contrast to C4 metabolism, whichspatially separates the CO2 fixation to PEP from the Calvin cycle, CAMtemporally separates these two processes. CAM plants have a differentleaf anatomy from C3 plants, and fix the CO2 at night, when their stomata are open. CAM plants store the CO2 mostly in the form ofmalic acid via carboxylation ofphosphoenolpyruvate tooxaloacetate, which is then reduced to malate. Decarboxylation of malate during the day releases CO2 inside the leaves, thus allowing carbon fixation to 3-phosphoglycerate by RuBisCO. CAM is used by 16,000species of plants.[37]

Calcium-oxalate-accumulating plants, such asAmaranthus hybridus andColobanthus quitensis, show a variation of photosynthesis where calcium oxalatecrystals function as dynamiccarbon pools, supplying carbon dioxide (CO2) to photosynthetic cells when stomata are partially or totally closed. This process was namedalarm photosynthesis. Understress conditions (e.g.,water deficit),oxalate released from calcium oxalate crystals is converted to CO2 by anoxalate oxidase enzyme, and the produced CO2 can support theCalvin cycle reactions. Reactivehydrogen peroxide (H2O2), thebyproduct of oxalate oxidase reaction, can beneutralized bycatalase. Alarm photosynthesis represents a photosynthetic variant to be added to the well-known C4 and CAM pathways. However, alarm photosynthesis, in contrast to these pathways, operates as a biochemical pump that collects carbon from the organ interior (or from thesoil) and not from the atmosphere.[38][39]

In water

Cyanobacteria possesscarboxysomes, which increase the concentration of CO2 around RuBisCO to increase the rate of photosynthesis. An enzyme,carbonic anhydrase, located within the carboxysome, releases CO2 from dissolvedhydrocarbonate ions (HCO
3
). Before the CO2 can diffuse out, RuBisCO concentrated within the carboxysome quickly sponges it up. HCO
3
ions are made from CO2 outside the cell by another carbonic anhydrase and are actively pumped into the cell by a membrane protein. They cannot cross the membrane as they are charged, and within the cytosol they turn back into CO2 very slowly without the help of carbonic anhydrase. This causes the HCO
3
ions to accumulate within the cell from where they diffuse into the carboxysomes.[40]Pyrenoids inalgae andhornworts also act to concentrate CO2 around RuBisCO.[41][42]

Order and kinetics

The overallprocess of photosynthesis takes place in four stages:[14]

StageEventSiteTime scale
1Energy transfer inantenna chlorophyllThylakoid membranes in thechloroplastsFemtosecond topicosecond
2Transfer of electrons inphotochemical reactionsPicosecond tonanosecond
3Electron transport chain andATP synthesisMicrosecond tomillisecond
4Carbon fixation and export of stableproductsStroma of the chloroplasts and the cellcytosolMillisecond tosecond

Efficiency

Main article:Photosynthetic efficiency

Plants usuallyconvert light into chemical energy with aphotosynthetic efficiency of 3–6%.[43][44] Absorbed light that is unconverted isdissipated primarily asheat, with a smallfraction (1–2%) reemitted aschlorophyll fluorescence at longer (redder)wavelengths. This fact allowsmeasurement of thelight reaction of photosynthesis by using chlorophyllfluorometers.[45]

Actual plants' photosynthetic efficiency varies with thefrequency of the light being converted,light intensity,temperature, and proportion ofcarbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and can vary from 0.1% to 8%.[46] By comparison,solar panels convert light intoelectric energy at an efficiency of approximately 6–20% formass-produced panels, and above 40% inlaboratory devices.Scientists are studying photosynthesis in hopes of developing plants with increasedyield.[44]

The efficiency of both light and dark reactions can be measured, but the relationship between the two can be complex. For example, thelight reaction createsATP andNADPH energymolecules, whichC3 plants can use forcarbon fixation orphotorespiration.[47]Electrons may also flow to other electron sinks.[48][49][50] For this reason, it is not uncommon forauthors to differentiate between work done undernon-photorespiratory conditions and under photorespiratory conditions.[51][52][53]

Chlorophyll fluorescence ofphotosystem II can measure the light reaction, andinfrared gas analyzers can measure thedark reaction.[54] An integrated chlorophyllfluorometer andgas exchange system can investigate both light and dark reactions when researchers use the two separatesystems together.[55] Infrared gas analyzers and somemoisture sensors are sensitive enough to measure thephotosynthetic assimilation ofCO2 and ofΔH2O usingreliable methods. CO2 is commonly measured inμmols/(m2/s),parts per million, or volume per million; andH2O is commonly measured inmmols/(m2/s) or inmbars. By measuringCO2 assimilation, ΔH2O, leaf temperature,barometric pressure, leaf area, andphotosynthetically active radiation (PAR), it becomes possible to estimate, "A" or carbon assimilation, "E" ortranspiration, "gs" orstomatal conductance, and "Ci" or intracellular CO2.[56] However, it is more common to use chlorophyll fluorescence forplant stress measurement, where appropriate, because the most commonly used parametersFV/FM andY(II) or F/FM' can be measured in a few seconds, allowing the investigation of larger plant populations.[53]

Gas exchange systems that offer control of CO2 levels, above and belowambient, allow the common practice of measurement of A/Ci curves, at different CO2 levels, to characterize a plant's photosynthetic response.[56]

Integrated chlorophyll fluorometer – gas exchange systems allow a moreprecise measure of photosynthetic response and mechanisms.[54][55] While standard gas exchange photosynthesis systems can measure Ci, or substomatal CO2 levels, the addition of integrated chlorophyll fluorescence measurements allows a more precise measurement of CC, the estimation of CO2 concentration at the site ofcarboxylation in the chloroplast, to replace Ci.[55][54] CO2 concentration in the chloroplast becomes possible to estimate with the measurement of mesophyll conductance or gm using an integrated system.[54][55][57]

Photosynthesis measurement systems are not designed to directly measure the amount of light the leaf absorbs, but analysis ofchlorophyll fluorescence,P700- and P515-absorbance, andgas exchange measurements reveal detailed information about, e.g., thephotosystems,quantum efficiency and the CO2 assimilation rates. With some instruments, even wavelength dependency of the photosynthetic efficiency can beanalyzed.[58]

Aphenomenon known asquantum walk increases the efficiency of the energy transport of light significantly. In the photosynthetic cell of analga,bacterium, or plant, there are light-sensitive molecules calledchromophores arranged in an antenna-shaped structure called a photocomplex. When aphoton is absorbed by a chromophore, it is converted into aquasiparticle referred to as anexciton, which jumps from chromophore to chromophore towards the reaction center of the photocomplex, a collection of molecules that traps its energy in a chemical form accessible to the cell's metabolism. The exciton's wave properties enable it to cover a wider area and try out several possible paths simultaneously, allowing it to instantaneously "choose" the most efficient route, where it will have the highest probability of arriving at its destination in the minimum possible time.

Because that quantum walking takes place at temperatures far higher than quantum phenomena usually occur, it is only possible over very short distances. Obstacles in the form of destructive interference cause the particle to lose its wave properties for an instant before it regains them once again after it is freed from its locked position through a classic "hop". The movement of the electron towards the photo center is therefore covered in a series of conventional hops and quantum walks.[59][60][61]

Evolution

Main article:Evolution of photosynthesis
This box:
−4500 —
−4000 —
−3500 —
−3000 —
−2500 —
−2000 —
−1500 —
−1000 —
−500 —
0 —
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Fossils of what are thought to befilamentous photosyntheticorganisms have been dated at 3.4 billion years old.[62][63] More recentstudies also suggest that photosynthesis may have begun about 3.4 billion years ago,[64][65] though the first directevidence of photosynthesis comes fromthylakoid membranes preserved in 1.75-billion-year-oldcherts.[66]

Oxygenic photosynthesis is the main source ofoxygen in theEarth's atmosphere, and its earliest appearance is sometimes referred to as theoxygen catastrophe.Geological evidence suggests that oxygenic photosynthesis, such as that incyanobacteria, became important during thePaleoproterozoic era around two billion years ago. Modern photosynthesis inplants and most photosyntheticprokaryotes is oxygenic, usingwater as anelectron donor, which isoxidized to molecular oxygen in thephotosynthetic reaction center.

Symbiosis and the origin of chloroplasts

Plant cells with visible chloroplasts (from a moss,Plagiomnium affine)

Several groups ofanimals have formedsymbiotic relationships with photosyntheticalgae. These are most common incorals,sponges, andsea anemones.Scientists presume that this is due to the particularly simplebody plans and largesurface areas of these animals compared to theirvolumes.[67] In addition, a few marinemollusks, such asElysia viridis andElysia chlorotica, also maintain a symbiotic relationship withchloroplasts they capture from the algae intheir diet and then store in their bodies (seeKleptoplasty). This allows the mollusks to survive solely by photosynthesis for several months at a time.[68][69] Some of thegenes from the plantcell nucleus have even been transferred to theslugs, so that the chloroplasts can be supplied withproteins they need to survive.[70]

An even closer form of symbiosis may explain the origin of chloroplasts. Chloroplasts have many similarities with photosyntheticbacteria, including a circularchromosome, prokaryotic-typeribosome, and similarproteins in the photosynthetic reaction center.[71][72] Theendosymbiotic theory suggests that photosynthetic bacteria were acquired (byendocytosis) by earlyeukaryotic cells to form the first plant cells. Therefore, chloroplasts may be photosynthetic bacteria that adapted to life inside plant cells. Likemitochondria, chloroplasts possess their ownDNA, separate from thenuclear DNA of their plant host cells and the genes in this chloroplast DNA resemble those found incyanobacteria.[73] DNA in chloroplasts codes forredox proteins such as those found in the photosynthetic reaction centers. TheCoRR Hypothesis proposes that this co-location of genes with their gene products is required for redox regulation ofgene expression, and accounts for the persistence of DNA in bioenergeticorganelles.[74]

Photosynthetic eukaryotic lineages

Symbiotic andkleptoplastic organisms excluded:

Except for the euglenids, which are found within theExcavata, all of these belong to theDiaphoretickes. Archaeplastida and the photosynthetic Paulinella got their plastids, which are surrounded by two membranes, through primaryendosymbiosis in two separate events, by engulfing a cyanobacterium. The plastids in all the other groups have either a red or green algal origin, and are referred to as the "red lineages" and the "green lineages". The only known exception is the ciliatePseudoblepharisma tenue, which in addition to its plastids that originated from green algae also has apurple sulfur bacterium as symbiont. In dinoflagellates and euglenids the plastids are surrounded by three membranes, and in the remaining lines by four. Anucleomorph, remnants of the original algal nucleus located between the inner and outer membranes of the plastid, is present in the cryptophytes (from a red alga) and chlorarachniophytes (from a green alga).[75]Some dinoflagellates that lost their photosynthetic ability later regained it again through new endosymbiotic events with different algae.While able to perform photosynthesis, many of these eukaryotic groups aremixotrophs and practiceheterotrophy to various degrees.

Photosynthetic prokaryotic lineages

Early photosynthetic systems, such as those ingreen andpurple sulfur andgreen andpurple nonsulfur bacteria, are thought to have beenanoxygenic, and used various other molecules than water aselectron donors. Green and purple sulfur bacteria are thought to have usedhydrogen andsulfur as electron donors. Green nonsulfur bacteria used variousamino and otherorganic acids as electron donors. Purple nonsulfur bacteria used a variety of nonspecific organic molecules. The use of these molecules is consistent with the geological evidence that Earth's early atmosphere was highlyreducing atthat time.[76]

With a possible exception ofHeimdallarchaeota, photosynthesis is not found inarchaea.[77]Haloarchaea arephotoheterotrophic; they can absorb energy from the sun, but do not harvest carbon from the atmosphere and are therefore not photosynthetic.[78] Instead of chlorophyll they use rhodopsins, which convert light-energy to ion gradients but cannot mediate electron transfer reactions.[79][80]

Inbacteria eight photosynthetic lineages are currently known:[81][82][83][84]

Cyanobacteria and the evolution of photosynthesis

The biochemical capacity to use water as the source for electrons in photosynthesis evolved once, in acommon ancestor of extantcyanobacteria (formerly called blue-green algae). The geological record indicates that this transforming event took place early in Earth's history, at least 2450–2320 million years ago (Ma), and, it is speculated, much earlier.[85][86] Because the Earth's atmosphere contained almost no oxygen during the estimated development of photosynthesis, it is believed that the first photosynthetic cyanobacteria did not generate oxygen.[87] Available evidence from geobiological studies ofArchean (>2500 Ma)sedimentary rocks indicates that life existed 3500 Ma, but the question of when oxygenic photosynthesis evolved is still unanswered. A clear paleontological window on cyanobacterialevolution opened about 2000 Ma, revealing an already-diverse biota of cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria remained the principalprimary producers of oxygen throughout theProterozoic Eon (2500–543 Ma), in part because the redox structure of the oceans favored photoautotrophs capable ofnitrogen fixation.[88][89]Green algae joined cyanobacteria as the major primary producers of oxygen oncontinental shelves near the end of theProterozoic, but only with theMesozoic (251–66 Ma) radiations of dinoflagellates, coccolithophorids, and diatoms did theprimary production of oxygen in marine shelf waters take modern form. Cyanobacteria remain critical tomarine ecosystems asprimary producers of oxygen in oceanic gyres, as agents of biological nitrogen fixation, and, in modified form, as theplastids of marine algae.[90]

Experimental history

Discovery

Although some of the steps in photosynthesis are still not completely understood, the overall photosynthetic equation has been known since the 19th century.

Portrait ofJan Baptist van Helmont byMary Beale, c. 1674

Jan van Helmont began theresearch of theprocess in the mid-17th century when he carefully measured themass of thesoil aplant was using and the mass of the plant as it grew. After noticing that the soil mass changed very little, hehypothesized that the mass of thegrowing plant must come from thewater, the onlysubstance he added to the potted plant. His hypothesis was partiallyaccurate – much of the gained mass comes fromcarbon dioxide as well as water. However, this was a signaling point to the idea that the bulk of a plant'sbiomass comes from the inputs of photosynthesis, not the soil itself.

Joseph Priestley, achemist andminister, discovered that when he isolated avolume of air under an invertedjar and burned acandle in it (which gave offCO2), the candle would burn out very quickly, much before it ran out ofwax. He further discovered that amouse could similarly"injure" air. He then showed that a plant could restore the air the candle and the mouse had "injured".[91]

In 1779,Jan Ingenhousz repeated Priestley'sexperiments. He discovered that it was the influence ofsunlight on the plant that could cause it to revive a mouse in a matter of hours.[91][92]

In 1796,Jean Senebier, a Swisspastor,botanist, andnaturalist,demonstrated thatgreen plants consume carbon dioxide and release oxygen under the influence oflight. Soon afterward,Nicolas-Théodore de Saussure showed that the increase in mass of the plant as it grows could not be due only to uptake of CO2 but also to the incorporation of water. Thus, the basicreaction by whichorganisms use photosynthesis to producefood (such asglucose) was outlined.[93]

Refinements

Cornelis Van Niel made key discoveries explaining thechemistry of photosynthesis. By studyingpurple sulfur bacteria andgreen bacteria, he was the first to demonstrate that photosynthesis is a light-dependentredox reaction in which hydrogenreduces (donates itsatoms aselectrons andprotons to) carbon dioxide.

Robert Emerson discovered two light reactions by testing plant productivity using different wavelengths of light. With the red alone, the light reactions were suppressed. When blue and red were combined, the output was much more substantial. Thus, there were two photosystems, one absorbing up to 600 nm wavelengths, the other up to 700 nm. The former is known as PSII, the latter is PSI. PSI contains only chlorophyll "a", PSII contains primarily chlorophyll "a" with most of the available chlorophyll "b", among other pigments. These include phycobilins, which are the red and blue pigments of red and blue algae, respectively, and fucoxanthol for brown algae and diatoms. The process is most productive when the absorption of quanta is equal in both PSII and PSI, assuring that input energy from the antenna complex is divided between the PSI and PSII systems, which in turn powers the photochemistry.[14]

Robert Hill thought that a complex of reactions consisted of an intermediate to cytochrome b6 (now a plastoquinone), and that another was from cytochrome f to a step in the carbohydrate-generating mechanisms. These are linked by plastoquinone, which does require energy to reduce cytochrome f. Further experiments to prove that the oxygen developed during the photosynthesis of green plants came from water were performed by Hill in 1937 and 1939. He showed that isolatedchloroplasts give off oxygen in the presence of unnatural reducing agents likeironoxalate,ferricyanide orbenzoquinone after exposure to light. In the Hill reaction:[94]

2 H2O + 2 A + (light, chloroplasts) → 2 AH2 + O2

A is the electron acceptor. Therefore, in light, the electron acceptor is reduced and oxygen is evolved.Samuel Ruben andMartin Kamen usedradioactive isotopes to determine that the oxygen liberated in photosynthesis came from the water.

Melvin Calvin works in his photosynthesis laboratory.

Melvin Calvin andAndrew Benson, along withJames Bassham, elucidated the path of carbon assimilation (the photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle) in plants. The carbon reduction cycle is known as theCalvin cycle, but many scientists refer to it as the Calvin-Benson, Benson-Calvin, or even Calvin-Benson-Bassham (or CBB) Cycle.

Nobel Prize–winning scientistRudolph A. Marcus was later able to discover the function and significance of the electron transport chain.

Otto Heinrich Warburg andDean Burk discovered the I-quantum photosynthesis reaction that splits CO2, activated by the respiration.[95]

In 1950, first experimental evidence for the existence ofphotophosphorylationin vivo was presented byOtto Kandler using intactChlorella cells and interpreting his findings as light-dependentATP formation.[96]In 1954,Daniel I. Arnon et al. discovered photophosphorylationin vitro in isolatedchloroplasts with the help of P32.[97][98]

Louis N. M. Duysens andJan Amesz discovered that chlorophyll "a" will absorb one light, oxidize cytochrome f, while chlorophyll "a" (and other pigments) will absorb another light but will reduce this same oxidized cytochrome, stating the two light reactions are in series.

Development of the concept

In 1893, the American botanistCharles Reid Barnes proposed two terms,photosyntax andphotosynthesis, for the biological process ofsynthesis of complex carbon compounds out of carbonic acid, in the presence of chlorophyll, under the influence of light. The termphotosynthesis is derived from theGreekphōs (φῶς, gleam) andsýnthesis (σύνθεσις, arranging together),[99][100][101] while another word that he designated wasphotosyntax, fromsýntaxis (σύνταξις, configuration). Over time, the termphotosynthesis came into common usage. Later discovery of anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria and photophosphorylation necessitated redefinition of the term.[102]

C3 : C4 photosynthesis research

In the late 1940s at theUniversity of California, Berkeley, the details of photosynthetic carbon metabolism were sorted out by the chemistsMelvin Calvin, Andrew Benson, James Bassham and a score of students and researchers utilizing the carbon-14 isotope and paper chromatography techniques.[103] The pathway of CO2 fixation by the algaeChlorella in a fraction of a second in light resulted in a three carbon molecule called phosphoglyceric acid (PGA). For that original and ground-breaking work, aNobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Melvin Calvin in 1961. In parallel, plant physiologists studied leaf gas exchanges using the new method of infrared gas analysis and a leaf chamber where the net photosynthetic rates ranged from 10 to 13 μmol CO2·m−2·s−1, with the conclusion that all terrestrial plants have the same photosynthetic capacities, that are light saturated at less than 50% of sunlight.[104][105]

Later in 1958–1963 atCornell University, field grownmaize was reported to have much greater leaf photosynthetic rates of 40 μmol CO2·m−2·s−1 and not be saturated at near full sunlight.[106][107] This higher rate in maize was almost double of those observed in other species such as wheat and soybean, indicating that large differences in photosynthesis exist among higher plants. At the University of Arizona, detailed gas exchange research on more than 15 species ofmonocots anddicots uncovered for the first time that differences in leaf anatomy are crucial factors in differentiating photosynthetic capacities among species.[108][109] In tropical grasses, including maize, sorghum, sugarcane, Bermuda grass and in the dicot amaranthus, leaf photosynthetic rates were around 38−40 μmol CO2·m−2·s−1, and the leaves have two types of green cells, i.e. outer layer of mesophyll cells surrounding a tightly packed cholorophyllous vascular bundle sheath cells. This type of anatomy was termed Kranz anatomy in the 19th century by the botanistGottlieb Haberlandt while studying leaf anatomy of sugarcane.[110] Plant species with the greatest photosynthetic rates and Kranz anatomy showed no apparent photorespiration, very low CO2 compensation point, high optimum temperature, high stomatal resistances and lower mesophyll resistances for gas diffusion and rates never saturated at full sun light.[111] The research at Arizona was designated a Citation Classic in 1986.[109] These species were later termed C4 plants as the first stable compound of CO2 fixation in light has four carbons as malate and aspartate.[112][113][114] Other species that lack Kranz anatomy were termed C3 type such as cotton and sunflower, as the first stable carbon compound is the three-carbon PGA. At 1000 ppm CO2 in measuring air, both the C3 and C4 plants had similar leaf photosynthetic rates around 60 μmol CO2·m−2·s−1 indicating the suppression of photorespiration in C3 plants.[108][109]

Factors

Theleaf is the primary site of photosynthesis in plants.

There are four main factors influencing photosynthesis and several corollary factors. The four main are:[115]

Total photosynthesis is limited by a range of environmental factors. These include the amount of light available, the amount ofleaf area a plant has to capture light (shading by other plants is a major limitation of photosynthesis), the rate at which carbon dioxide can be supplied to thechloroplasts to support photosynthesis, the availability of water, and the availability of suitable temperatures for carrying out photosynthesis.[116]

Light intensity (irradiance), wavelength and temperature

See also:PI (photosynthesis-irradiance) curve
Absorbance spectra of free chlorophylla (blue) andb (red) in a solvent. The action spectra of chlorophyll molecules are slightly modifiedin vivo depending on specific pigment–protein interactions.

The process of photosynthesis provides the main input of free energy into the biosphere, and is one of four main ways in which radiation is important for plant life.[117]

The radiation climate within plant communities is extremely variable, in both time and space.

In the early 20th century,Frederick Blackman andGabrielle Matthaei investigated the effects of light intensity (irradiance) and temperature on the rate of carbon assimilation.

  • At constant temperature, the rate of carbon assimilation varies with irradiance, increasing as the irradiance increases, but reaching a plateau at higher irradiance.
  • At low irradiance, increasing the temperature has little influence on the rate of carbon assimilation. At constant high irradiance, the rate of carbon assimilation increases as the temperature is increased.

These two experiments illustrate several important points: First, it is known that, in general,photochemical reactions are not affected bytemperature. However, these experiments clearly show that temperature affects the rate of carbon assimilation, so there must be two sets of reactions in the full process of carbon assimilation. These are the light-dependent 'photochemical' temperature-independent stage, and the light-independent, temperature-dependent stage. Second, Blackman's experiments illustrate the concept oflimiting factors. Another limiting factor is the wavelength of light. Cyanobacteria, which reside several meters underwater, cannot receive the correct wavelengths required to cause photoinduced charge separation in conventional photosynthetic pigments. To combat this problem, Cyanobacteria have a light-harvesting complex calledPhycobilisome.[118] This complex is made up of a series of proteins with different pigments which surround the reaction center.

Carbon dioxide levels and photorespiration

Photorespiration

As carbon dioxide concentrations rise, the rate at which sugars are made by the light-independent reactions increases until limited by other factors.RuBisCO, the enzyme that captures carbon dioxide in the light-independent reactions, has a binding affinity for both carbon dioxide and oxygen. When the concentration of carbon dioxide is high, RuBisCO will fix carbon dioxide. However, if the carbon dioxide concentration is low, RuBisCO will bind oxygen instead of carbon dioxide. This process, calledphotorespiration, uses energy, but does not produce sugars.

RuBisCO oxygenase activity is disadvantageous to plants for several reasons:

  1. One product of oxygenase activity is phosphoglycolate (2 carbon) instead of3-phosphoglycerate (3 carbon). Phosphoglycolate cannot be metabolized by the Calvin-Benson cycle and represents carbon lost from the cycle. A high oxygenase activity, therefore, drains the sugars that are required to recycle ribulose 5-bisphosphate and for the continuation of theCalvin-Benson cycle.
  2. Phosphoglycolate is quickly metabolized to glycolate that is toxic to a plant at a high concentration; it inhibits photosynthesis.
  3. Salvaging glycolate is an energetically expensive process that uses the glycolate pathway, and only 75% of the carbon is returned to the Calvin-Benson cycle as 3-phosphoglycerate. The reactions also produceammonia (NH3), which is able todiffuse out of the plant, leading to a loss of nitrogen.
A highly simplified summary is:
2 glycolate + ATP → 3-phosphoglycerate + carbon dioxide + ADP + NH3

The salvaging pathway for the products of RuBisCO oxygenase activity is more commonly known as photorespiration, since it is characterized by light-dependent oxygen consumption and the release of carbon dioxide.

See also

References

  1. ^"Photosynthesis".lexico.com (Lexico UK English Dictionary). Oxford University Press. Archived fromthe original on 2022-08-11. Retrieved2023-07-15.
  2. ^abBryant, Donald A.; Frigaard, Niels-Ulrik (Nov 2006)."Prokaryotic photosynthesis and phototrophy illuminated".Trends in Microbiology.14 (11):488–496.doi:10.1016/j.tim.2006.09.001.PMID 16997562.
  3. ^Canfield, D. E. (1998). "A new model for Proterozoic ocean chemistry".Nature.396 (6710):450–453.Bibcode:1998Natur.396..450C.doi:10.1038/24839.ISSN 0028-0836.S2CID 4414140.
  4. ^Javaux, E. J.; Lepot, K. (2018)."The Paleoproterozoic fossil record: Implications for the evolution of the biosphere during Earth's middle-age".Earth-Science Reviews.176:68–86.Bibcode:2018ESRv..176...68J.doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.10.001.hdl:20.500.12210/62416.
  5. ^DasSarma, Shiladitya; Schwieterman, Edward W. (2018-10-11)."Early evolution of purple retinal pigments on Earth and implications for exoplanet biosignatures".International Journal of Astrobiology.20 (3).Cambridge University Press:241–250.arXiv:1810.05150.Bibcode:2021IJAsB..20..241D.doi:10.1017/S1473550418000423. Retrieved2025-08-03.
  6. ^Reece, Jane B.; Urry, Lisa A.; Cain, Michael L.; Wasserman, Steven A.; Minorsky, Peter V.; Jackson, Robert B.; Campbel, Neil A. (2011).Biology (International ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education. pp. 235, 244.ISBN 978-0-321-73975-9.This initial incorporation of carbon into organic compounds is known as carbon fixation
  7. ^Olson JM (May 2006). "Photosynthesis in the Archean era".Photosynthesis Research.88 (2):109–117.Bibcode:2006PhoRe..88..109O.doi:10.1007/s11120-006-9040-5.PMID 16453059.S2CID 20364747.
  8. ^Buick R (Aug 2008)."When did oxygenic photosynthesis evolve?".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B.363 (1504):2731–2743.Bibcode:2008RSPTB.363.2731B.doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0041.PMC 2606769.PMID 18468984.
  9. ^Nealson KH, Conrad PG (Dec 1999)."Life: past, present and future".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B.354 (1392):1923–1939.doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0532.PMC 1692713.PMID 10670014.
  10. ^Whitmarsh, John; Govindjee (1999)."Chapter 2: The photosynthetic process". In Singhal G.S.; Renger G.; Sopory S.K.; Irrgang K.D.; Govindjee (eds.).Concepts in photobiology: photosynthesis and photomorphogenesis. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 11–51.ISBN 978-0-7923-5519-9.Archived from the original on 2010-08-14. Retrieved2012-07-07.It is estimated that photosynthetic organisms remove100×1015 grams of carbon/year fixed by photosynthetic organisms. This is equivalent to4×1018 kJ/yr of free energy stored in reduced carbon. (in Part 8: "Global photosynthesis and the atmosphere")
  11. ^Steger U, Achterberg W, Blok K, Bode H, Frenz W, Gather C, Hanekamp G, Imboden D, Jahnke M, Kost M, Kurz R, Nutzinger HG, Ziesemer T (2005).Sustainable development and innovation in the energy sector. Berlin:Springer. p. 32.ISBN 978-3-540-23103-5.Archived from the original on 2016-09-02. Retrieved2016-02-21.The average global rate of photosynthesis is 130 TW.
  12. ^"World Consumption of Primary Energy by Energy Type and Selected Country Groups, 1980–2004".Energy Information Administration. July 31, 2006. Archived fromthe original(XLS) on November 9, 2006. Retrieved2007-01-20.
  13. ^Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P (Jul 1998)."Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components".Science.281 (5374):237–240.Bibcode:1998Sci...281..237F.doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237.PMID 9657713.Archived from the original on 2018-09-25. Retrieved2018-04-20.
  14. ^abc"Photosynthesis".McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology. Vol. 13. New York:McGraw-Hill. 2007.ISBN 978-0-07-144143-8.
  15. ^Ingrouille, Martin; Eddie, Bill (August 17, 2006).Plants: Diversity and Evolution. Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-1-139-45546-6 – via Google Books.
  16. ^George, Drishya M.; Vincent, Annette S.; Mackey, Hamish R. (2020)."An overview of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria and their applications in environmental biotechnology for sustainable Resource recovery".Biotechnology Reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands).28 e00563.doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00563.ISSN 2215-017X.PMC 7714679.PMID 33304839.
  17. ^Fuchs, Georg (1987)."Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Anaerobic Bacteria". In Aresta, M.; Forti, G. (eds.).Carbon Dioxide as a Source of Carbon: Biochemical and Chemical Uses. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 263–273.doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3923-3_14.ISBN 978-94-009-3923-3. Retrieved2024-06-10.
  18. ^Stefano, George B.; Snyder, Christopher; Kream, Richard M. (2015-07-17)."Mitochondria, Chloroplasts in Animal and Plant Cells: Significance of Conformational Matching".Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research.21:2073–2078.doi:10.12659/MSM.894758.ISSN 1643-3750.PMC 4517925.PMID 26184462.
  19. ^Shimakawa, Ginga; Matsuda, Yusuke; Burlacot, Adrien (2024). "Crosstalk between photosynthesis and respiration in microbes".Journal of Biosciences.49 (2): 45.doi:10.1007/s12038-023-00417-4.ISSN 0973-7138.PMID 38516912.
  20. ^Whitmarsh & Govindjee 1999, p. 13.
  21. ^Anaerobic Photosynthesis,Chemical & Engineering News,86, 33, August 18, 2008, p. 36
  22. ^Kulp TR, Hoeft SE, Asao M, Madigan MT, Hollibaugh JT, Fisher JC, Stolz JF, Culbertson CW, Miller LG,Oremland RS (Aug 2008)."Arsenic(III) fuels anoxygenic photosynthesis in hot spring biofilms from Mono Lake, California".Science.321 (5891):967–970.Bibcode:2008Sci...321..967K.doi:10.1126/science.1160799.PMID 18703741.S2CID 39479754.Archived from the original on 2020-07-28. Retrieved2020-01-17.
  23. ^"Scientists discover unique microbe in California's largest lake".bio-medicine.org. January 2005. Archived fromthe original on 2009-07-12. Retrieved2009-07-20.
  24. ^Ingrouille M, Eddie B (2006-08-17).Plants: Diversity and Evolution. Cambridge University Press. pp. 13–14.ISBN 978-1-139-45546-6.
  25. ^Tavano CL, Donohue TJ (December 2006)."Development of the bacterial photosynthetic apparatus".Current Opinion in Microbiology.9 (6):625–631.doi:10.1016/j.mib.2006.10.005.PMC 2765710.PMID 17055774.
  26. ^abMullineaux CW (1999). "The thylakoid membranes of cyanobacteria: structure, dynamics and function".Australian Journal of Plant Physiology.26 (7):671–677.Bibcode:1999FunPB..26..671M.doi:10.1071/PP99027.
  27. ^Sener MK, Olsen JD, Hunter CN, Schulten K (October 2007)."Atomic-level structural and functional model of a bacterial photosynthetic membrane vesicle".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.104 (40):15723–15728.Bibcode:2007PNAS..10415723S.doi:10.1073/pnas.0706861104.PMC 2000399.PMID 17895378.
  28. ^Campbell NA, Williamson B, Heyden RJ (2006).Biology Exploring Life. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.ISBN 978-0-13-250882-7. Archived fromthe original on 2014-11-02. Retrieved2009-02-03.
  29. ^Ziehe D, Dünschede B, Schünemann D (December 2018)."Molecular mechanism of SRP-dependent light-harvesting protein transport to the thylakoid membrane in plants".Photosynthesis Research.138 (3):303–313.Bibcode:2018PhoRe.138..303Z.doi:10.1007/s11120-018-0544-6.PMC 6244792.PMID 29956039.
  30. ^abRaven PH, Evert RF, Eichhorn SE (2005).Biology of Plants (7th ed.). New York:W. H. Freeman and Company. pp. 124–127.ISBN 978-0-7167-1007-3.
  31. ^"Yachandra / Yano Group". Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Archived fromthe original on 2019-07-22. Retrieved2019-07-22.
  32. ^Pushkar Y, Yano J, Sauer K, Boussac A, Yachandra VK (February 2008)."Structural changes in the Mn4Ca cluster and the mechanism of photosynthetic water splitting".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.105 (6):1879–1884.Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.1879P.doi:10.1073/pnas.0707092105.PMC 2542863.PMID 18250316.
  33. ^abWilliams BP, Johnston IG, Covshoff S, Hibberd JM (September 2013)."Phenotypic landscape inference reveals multiple evolutionary paths to C4 photosynthesis".eLife.2 e00961.doi:10.7554/eLife.00961.PMC 3786385.PMID 24082995.
  34. ^Taiz L, Geiger E (2006).Plant Physiology (4th ed.).Sinauer Associates.ISBN 978-0-87893-856-8.
  35. ^Monson RK, Sage RF (1999)."The Taxonomic Distribution ofC
    4
    Photosynthesis"
    .C4 plant biology. Boston:Academic Press. pp. 551–580.ISBN 978-0-12-614440-6.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  36. ^Lundgren MR (December 2020)."C 2 photosynthesis: a promising route towards crop improvement?".New Phytologist.228 (6):1734–1740.Bibcode:2020NewPh.228.1734L.doi:10.1111/nph.16494.PMID 32080851.
  37. ^Dodd AN, Borland AM, Haslam RP, Griffiths H, Maxwell K (April 2002)."Crassulacean acid metabolism: plastic, fantastic".Journal of Experimental Botany.53 (369):569–580.doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.369.569.PMID 11886877.
  38. ^Tooulakou G, Giannopoulos A, Nikolopoulos D, Bresta P, Dotsika E, Orkoula MG, et al. (August 2016)."Alarm Photosynthesis: Calcium Oxalate Crystals as an Internal CO2 Source in Plants".Plant Physiology.171 (4):2577–2585.doi:10.1104/pp.16.00111.PMC 4972262.PMID 27261065.
  39. ^Gómez-Espinoza O, González-Ramírez D, Bresta P, Karabourniotis G, Bravo LA (October 2020)."Decomposition of Calcium Oxalate Crystals inColobanthus quitensis under CO2 Limiting Conditions".Plants.9 (10): 1307.Bibcode:2020Plnts...9.1307G.doi:10.3390/plants9101307.PMC 7600318.PMID 33023238.
  40. ^Badger MR, Price GD (February 2003)."CO2 concentrating mechanisms in cyanobacteria: molecular components, their diversity and evolution".Journal of Experimental Botany.54 (383):609–622.doi:10.1093/jxb/erg076.PMID 12554704.
  41. ^Badger MR, Andrews JT, Whitney SM, Ludwig M, Yellowlees DC, Leggat W, Price GD (1998). "The diversity and coevolution of Rubisco, plastids, pyrenoids, and chloroplast-based CO2-concentrating mechanisms in algae".Canadian Journal of Botany.76 (6):1052–1071.Bibcode:1998CaJB...76.1052B.doi:10.1139/b98-074.
  42. ^Robison, T. A., Oh, Z. G., Lafferty, D., Xu, X., Villarreal, J. C. A., Gunn, L. H., Li, F.-W. (3 January 2025). "Hornworts reveal a spatial model for pyrenoid-based CO2-concentrating mechanisms in land plants".Nature Plants.11 (1). Nature Publishing Group:63–73.doi:10.1038/s41477-024-01871-0.ISSN 2055-0278.PMID 39753956.
  43. ^Miyamoto K."Chapter 1 – Biological energy production".Renewable biological systems for alternative sustainable energy production (FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin – 128). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Archived from the original on 7 September 2013. Retrieved4 January 2009.
  44. ^abEhrenberg R (2017-12-15)."The photosynthesis fix".Knowable Magazine. Annual Reviews.doi:10.1146/knowable-121917-115502.Archived from the original on 2022-04-07. Retrieved2018-04-03.
  45. ^Maxwell K, Johnson GN (April 2000)."Chlorophyll fluorescence – a practical guide".Journal of Experimental Botany.51 (345):659–668.doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659.PMID 10938857.
  46. ^Govindjee, Rajni."What is Photosynthesis?". Biology at Illinois. Archived fromthe original on 27 May 2014. Retrieved17 April 2014.
  47. ^Rosenqvist E, van Kooten O (2006)."Chapter 2: Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A General Description and Nomenclature". In DeEll JA, Toivonen PM (eds.).Practical Applications of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Plant Biology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 39–78.ISBN 9781461504153.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  48. ^Baker NR, Oxborough K (2004)."Chapter 3: Chlorophyll fluorescence as a probe of photosynthetic productivity". In Papaqeorgiou G, Govindjee (eds.).Chlorophylla Fluorescence a Signature of Photosynthesis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. pp. 66–79.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  49. ^Flexas J, Escalnona JM, Medrano H (January 1999)."Water stress induces different levels of photosynthesis and electron transport rate regulation in grapevines".Plant, Cell and Environment.22 (1):39–48.Bibcode:1999PCEnv..22...39F.doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00371.x.
  50. ^Fryer MJ, Andrews JR, Oxborough K, Blowers DA, Baker NR (1998)."Relationship between CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron transport, and active O2 metabolism in leaves of maize in the field during periods of low temperature".Plant Physiology.116 (2):571–580.doi:10.1104/pp.116.2.571.PMC 35114.PMID 9490760.
  51. ^Earl H, Said Ennahli S (2004). "Estimating photosynthetic electron transport via chlorophyll fluorometry without Photosystem II light saturation".Photosynthesis Research.82 (2):177–186.Bibcode:2004PhoRe..82..177E.doi:10.1007/s11120-004-1454-3.PMID 16151873.S2CID 291238.
  52. ^Genty B, Briantais J, Baker NR (1989). "The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence".Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects.990 (1):87–92.doi:10.1016/s0304-4165(89)80016-9.
  53. ^abBaker NR (2008). "Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesisin vivo".Annual Review of Plant Biology.59 (1):89–113.Bibcode:2008AnRPB..59...89B.doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759.PMID 18444897.S2CID 31451852.
  54. ^abcdBernacchi CJ, Portis AR, Nakano H, von Caemmerer S, Long SP (2002)."Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo".Plant Physiology.130 (4):1992–1998.doi:10.1104/pp.008250.PMC 166710.PMID 12481082.
  55. ^abcdRibas-Carbo M, Flexas J, Robinson SA, Tcherkez GG (2010). "In vivo measurement of plant respiration".University of Wollongong Research Online.
  56. ^abLong SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003)."Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error".Journal of Experimental Botany.54 (392):2393–2401.doi:10.1093/jxb/erg262.PMID 14512377.
  57. ^Yin X, Struik PC (2009)."Theoretical reconsiderations when estimating the mesophyll conductanceto CO2 diffusion in leaves of C3 plants by analysis of combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements".Plant, Cell and Environment.32 (11): 1513–1524 [1524].Bibcode:2009PCEnv..32.1513Y.doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02016.x.PMID 19558403.
  58. ^Schreiber U, Klughammer C, Kolbowski J (2012)."Assessment of wavelength-dependent parameters of photosynthetic electron transport with a new type of multi-color PAM chlorophyll fluorometer".Photosynthesis Research.113 (1–3):127–144.Bibcode:2012PhoRe.113..127S.doi:10.1007/s11120-012-9758-1.PMC 3430841.PMID 22729479.
  59. ^Palmer J (21 June 2013)."Plants 'seen doing quantum physics'".BBC News.Archived from the original on 3 October 2018. Retrieved21 June 2018.
  60. ^Lloyd S (10 March 2014)."Quantum Biology: Better living through quantum mechanics". The Nature of Reality. Nova: PBS Online; WGBH Boston.Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved8 September 2017.
  61. ^Hildner R, Brinks D, Nieder JB, Cogdell RJ, van Hulst NF (June 2013). "Quantum coherent energy transfer over varying pathways in single light-harvesting complexes".Science.340 (6139):1448–1451.Bibcode:2013Sci...340.1448H.doi:10.1126/science.1235820.PMID 23788794.S2CID 25760719.
  62. ^Davis K (2 October 2004)."Photosynthesis got a really early start".New Scientist.Archived from the original on 1 May 2015. Retrieved8 September 2017.
  63. ^Hooper R (19 August 2006)."Revealing the dawn of photosynthesis".New Scientist.Archived from the original on 24 May 2015. Retrieved8 September 2017.
  64. ^Cardona T (March 2018)."Early Archean origin of heterodimeric Photosystem I".Heliyon.4 (3) e00548.Bibcode:2018Heliy...400548C.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00548.PMC 5857716.PMID 29560463.
  65. ^Howard V (7 March 2018)."Photosynthesis Originated A Billion Years Earlier Than We Thought, Study Shows".Astrobiology Magazine. Archived fromthe original on October 1, 2020. Retrieved23 March 2018.
  66. ^Demoulin, Catherine F.; Lara, Yannick J.; Lambion, Alexandre; Javaux, Emmanuelle J. (2024)."Oldest thylakoids in fossil cells directly evidence oxygenic photosynthesis".Nature.625 (7995):529–534.Bibcode:2024Natur.625..529D.doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06896-7.hdl:2268/312062.PMID 38172638.S2CID 266752333.
  67. ^Venn AA, Loram JE, Douglas AE (2008)."Photosynthetic symbioses in animals".Journal of Experimental Botany.59 (5):1069–1080.doi:10.1093/jxb/erm328.PMID 18267943.
  68. ^Rumpho ME, Summer EJ, Manhart JR (May 2000)."Solar-powered sea slugs. Mollusc/algal chloroplast symbiosis".Plant Physiology.123 (1):29–38.doi:10.1104/pp.123.1.29.PMC 1539252.PMID 10806222.
  69. ^Muscatine L, Greene RW (1973).Chloroplasts and Algae as Symbionts in Molluscs. International Review of Cytology. Vol. 36. pp. 137–169.doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60217-X.ISBN 978-0-12-364336-0.PMID 4587388.
  70. ^Rumpho ME, Worful JM, Lee J, Kannan K, Tyler MS, Bhattacharya D, Moustafa A, Manhart JR (November 2008)."Horizontal gene transfer of the algal nuclear gene psbO to the photosynthetic sea slug Elysia chlorotica".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.105 (46):17867–17871.Bibcode:2008PNAS..10517867R.doi:10.1073/pnas.0804968105.PMC 2584685.PMID 19004808.
  71. ^Douglas SE (December 1998). "Plastid evolution: origins, diversity, trends".Current Opinion in Genetics & Development.8 (6):655–661.doi:10.1016/S0959-437X(98)80033-6.PMID 9914199.
  72. ^Reyes-Prieto A, Weber AP, Bhattacharya D (2007). "The origin and establishment of the plastid in algae and plants".Annual Review of Genetics.41:147–168.doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130134.PMID 17600460.S2CID 8966320.
  73. ^Raven JA, Allen JF (2003)."Genomics and chloroplast evolution: what did cyanobacteria do for plants?".Genome Biology.4 (3): 209.doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-3-209.PMC 153454.PMID 12620099.
  74. ^Allen JF (December 2017)."The CoRR hypothesis for genes in organelles".Journal of Theoretical Biology.434:50–57.Bibcode:2017JThBi.434...50A.doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.04.008.PMID 28408315.
  75. ^Keeling PJ (March 2010)."The endosymbiotic origin, diversification and fate of plastids".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.365 (1541):729–748.doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0103.PMC 2817223.PMID 20124341.
  76. ^Gale J (2009).Astrobiology of Earth: The emergence, evolution and future of life on a planet in turmoil. Oxford University Press. pp. 112–113.ISBN 978-0-19-154835-2.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  77. ^Liu R, Cai R, Zhang J, Sun C (February 2020). "Heimdallarchaeota harness light energy through photosynthesis".bioRxiv.doi:10.1101/2020.02.20.957134.S2CID 213816522.
  78. ^DasSarma S, Schwieterman EW (June 2021)."Early evolution of purple retinal pigments on Earth and implications for exoplanet biosignatures".International Journal of Astrobiology.20 (3):241–250.arXiv:1810.05150.Bibcode:2021IJAsB..20..241D.doi:10.1017/S1473550418000423.S2CID 119341330. Lay summary in:"Purple reign: life on Earth might once have been dominated by purple microorganisms".CBC/Radio-Canada. 26 October 2018.
  79. ^Hamilton TL (August 2019)."The trouble with oxygen: The ecophysiology of extant phototrophs and implications for the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis".Free Radical Biology & Medicine.140:233–249.doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.05.003.PMID 31078729.S2CID 153285864.
  80. ^Sharma AK, Walsh DA, Bapteste E, Rodriguez-Valera F, Ford Doolittle W, Papke RT (May 2007)."Evolution of rhodopsin ion pumps in haloarchaea".BMC Evolutionary Biology.7 (1): 79.Bibcode:2007BMCEE...7...79S.doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-79.PMC 1885257.PMID 17511874.
  81. ^Xiong J (2006)."Photosynthesis: what color was its origin?".Genome Biology.7 (12): 245.doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-245.PMC 1794423.PMID 17210067.
  82. ^Paoli L, Ruscheweyh HJ, Forneris CC, Hubrich F, Kautsar S, Bhushan A, et al. (July 2022)."Biosynthetic potential of the global ocean microbiome".Nature.607 (7917):111–118.doi:10.1038/s43705-022-00201-9.PMC 9758169.PMID 35732736.
  83. ^He Z, Ferlez B, Kurashov V, Tank M, Golbeck JH, Bryant DA (October 2019)."Reaction centers of the thermophilic microaerophile, Chloracidobacterium thermophilum (Acidobacteria) I: biochemical and biophysical characterization".Photosynthesis Research.142 (1):87–103.Bibcode:2019PhoRe.142...87H.doi:10.1007/s11120-019-00650-9.OSTI 1800808.PMID 31161318.S2CID 254941681.
  84. ^Zeng Y, Feng F, Medová H, Dean J, Koblížek M (May 2014)."Functional type 2 photosynthetic reaction centers found in the rare bacterial phylum Gemmatimonadetes".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.111 (21):7795–7800.Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.7795Z.doi:10.1073/pnas.1400295111.PMC 4040607.PMID 24821787.
  85. ^Tomitani A, Knoll AH, Cavanaugh CM, Ohno T (April 2006)."The evolutionary diversification of cyanobacteria: molecular-phylogenetic and paleontological perspectives".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.103 (14):5442–5447.Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.5442T.doi:10.1073/pnas.0600999103.PMC 1459374.PMID 16569695.
  86. ^"Cyanobacteria: Fossil Record".ucmp.berkeley.edu. Archived fromthe original on 2010-08-24. Retrieved2010-08-26.
  87. ^Smith A (2010).Plant biology. New York: Garland Science. p. 5.ISBN 978-0-8153-4025-6.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  88. ^Olson, Stephanie L.; Reinhard, Christopher T.; Lyons, Timothy W. (2016)."Cyanobacterial Diazotrophy and Earth's Delayed Oxygenation".Frontiers in Microbiology.7: 1526.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01526.ISSN 1664-302X.PMC 5033965.PMID 27721813.
  89. ^Sánchez-Baracaldo, Patricia; Bianchini, Giorgio; Wilson, Jamie D.; Knoll, Andrew H. (2022)."Cyanobacteria and biogeochemical cycles through Earth history".Trends in Microbiology.30 (2):143–157.doi:10.1016/j.tim.2021.05.008.ISSN 1878-4380.PMID 34229911.
  90. ^Herrero A, Flores E (2008).The Cyanobacteria: Molecular Biology, Genomics and Evolution (1st ed.). Caister Academic Press.ISBN 978-1-904455-15-8.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  91. ^abMartin D, Thompson A, Stewart I, Gilbert E, Hope K, Kawai G, Griffiths A (September 2012)."A paradigm of fragile Earth in Priestley's bell jar".Extreme Physiology & Medicine.1 (1) 4.doi:10.1186/2046-7648-1-4.PMC 3707099.PMID 23849304.
  92. ^Gest H (2000)."Bicentenary homage to Dr Jan Ingen-Housz, MD (1730-1799), pioneer of photosynthesis research".Photosynthesis Research.63 (2):183–190.Bibcode:2000PhoRe..63..183G.doi:10.1023/A:1006460024843.PMID 16228428.S2CID 22970505.
  93. ^Rabinowitch EI (1945).Photosynthesis and Related Processes. Vol. 1.Archived from the original on 2020-08-06. Retrieved2019-12-14 – viaBiodiversity Heritage Library.
  94. ^Walker DA (2002)."'And whose bright presence' – an appreciation of Robert Hill and his reaction"(PDF).Photosynthesis Research.73 (1–3):51–54.Bibcode:2002PhoRe..73...51W.doi:10.1023/A:1020479620680.PMID 16245102.S2CID 21567780. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2008-03-09. Retrieved2015-08-27.
  95. ^Otto Warburg – BiographyArchived 2010-12-15 at theWayback Machine. Nobelprize.org (1970-08-01). Retrieved on 2011-11-03.
  96. ^Kandler O (1950)."Über die Beziehungen zwischen Phosphathaushalt und Photosynthese. I. Phosphatspiegelschwankungen bei Chlorella pyrenoidosa als Folge des Licht-Dunkel-Wechsels" [On the relationship between the phosphate metabolism and photosynthesis I. Variations in phosphate levels in Chlorella pyrenoidosa as a consequence of light-dark changes](PDF).Zeitschrift für Naturforschung.5b (8):423–437.doi:10.1515/znb-1950-0806.S2CID 97588826.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2018-06-24. Retrieved2018-06-26.
  97. ^Arnon DI, Whatley FR, Allen MB (1954). "Photosynthesis by isolated chloroplasts. II. Photophosphorylation, the conversion of light into phosphate bond energy".Journal of the American Chemical Society.76 (24):6324–6329.doi:10.1021/ja01653a025.
  98. ^Arnon DI (1956). "Phosphorus metabolism and photosynthesis".Annual Review of Plant Physiology.7:325–354.doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.07.060156.001545.
  99. ^"Photosynthesis".Online Etymology Dictionary.Archived from the original on 2013-03-07. Retrieved2013-05-23.
  100. ^Liddell HG,Scott R."φῶς".A Greek–English Lexicon.Perseus Project.
  101. ^Liddell HG,Scott R."σύνθεσις".A Greek–English Lexicon.Perseus Project.
  102. ^Gest H (2002). "History of the word photosynthesis and evolution of its definition".Photosynthesis Research.73 (1–3):7–10.Bibcode:2002PhoRe..73....7G.doi:10.1023/A:1020419417954.PMID 16245098.S2CID 11265932.
  103. ^Calvin M (July 1989). "Forty years of photosynthesis and related activities".Photosynthesis Research.21 (1):3–16.Bibcode:1989PhoRe..21....3C.doi:10.1007/BF00047170.PMID 24424488.S2CID 40443000.
  104. ^Verduin J (1953). "A table of photosynthesis rates under optimal, near natural conditions".Am. J. Bot.40 (9):675–679.Bibcode:1953AmJB...40..675V.doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1953.tb06540.x.JSTOR 2439681.
  105. ^Verduin J, Whitwer EE, Cowell BC (July 1959). "Maximal photosynthetic rates in nature".Science.130 (3370):268–269.Bibcode:1959Sci...130..268V.doi:10.1126/science.130.3370.268.PMID 13668557.S2CID 34122342.
  106. ^Hesketh JD, Musgrave R (1962). "Photosynthesis under field conditions. IV. Light studies with individual corn leaves".Crop Sci.2 (4):311–315.doi:10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183x000200040011x.S2CID 83706567.
  107. ^Hesketh JD, Moss DN (1963). "Variation in the response of photosynthesis to light".Crop Sci.3 (2):107–110.doi:10.2135/cropsci1963.0011183X000300020002x.
  108. ^abEl-Sharkawy, MA, Hesketh JD (1965). "Photosynthesis among species in relation to characteristics of leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion resistances".Crop Sci.5 (6):517–521.doi:10.2135/cropsci1965.0011183x000500060010x.
  109. ^abcEl-Sharkawy MA, Hesketh JD (1986)."Citation Classic-Photosynthesis among species in relation to characteristics of leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion resistances"(PDF).Curr. Cont./Agr.Biol.Environ.27: 14. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2023-11-29. Retrieved2023-12-06.
  110. ^Haberlandt G (1904).Physiologische Pflanzanatomie. Leipzig: Engelmann.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  111. ^El-Sharkawy MA (1965).Factors Limiting Photosynthetic Rates of Different Plant Species (Ph.D. thesis). The University of Arizona, Tucson.
  112. ^Karpilov YS (1960). "The distribution of radioactvity in carbon-14 among the products of photosynthesis in maize".Proc. Kazan Agric. Inst.14:15–24.
  113. ^Kortschak HP, Hart CE, Burr GO (1965)."Carbon dioxide fixation in sugarcane leaves".Plant Physiol.40 (2):209–213.doi:10.1104/pp.40.2.209.PMC 550268.PMID 16656075.
  114. ^Hatch MD, Slack CR (1966)."Photosynthesis by sugar-cane leaves. A new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar formation".Biochem. J.101 (1):103–111.doi:10.1042/bj1010103.PMC 1270070.PMID 5971771.
  115. ^Stirbet A, Lazár D, Guo Y, Govindjee G (September 2020)."Photosynthesis: basics, history and modelling".Annals of Botany.126 (4):511–537.doi:10.1093/aob/mcz171.PMC 7489092.PMID 31641747. Retrieved2023-02-09.
  116. ^Chapin FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002).Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York: Springer. pp. 97–104.ISBN 978-0-387-95443-1.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  117. ^Jones HG (2014).Plants and Microclimate: a Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology (Third ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-27959-8.Archived from the original on 2023-01-19. Retrieved2019-04-17.
  118. ^Adir N, Bar-Zvi S, Harris D (April 2020)."The amazing phycobilisome".Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. Light harvesting.1861 (4) 148047.doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2019.07.002.PMID 31306623.S2CID 196810874.

Further reading

Library resources about
Photosynthesis

Books

Papers

External links

Subdisciplines
Plant groups
Plant anatomy
Plant cells
Tissues
Vegetative
Reproductive
(incl. Flower)
Surface structures
Plant physiology
Materials
Plant growth
and habit
Reproduction
Plant taxonomy
Practice
  • Lists
  • Related
Metro-style map of major metabolic pathways



The image above contains clickable links
Majormetabolic pathways inmetro-style map. Click any text (name of pathway or metabolites) to link to the corresponding article.
Single lines: pathways common to most lifeforms. Double lines: pathways not in humans (occurs in e.g. plants, fungi, prokaryotes). Orange nodes:carbohydrate metabolism. Violet nodes:photosynthesis. Red nodes:cellular respiration. Pink nodes:cell signaling. Blue nodes:amino acid metabolism. Grey nodes:vitamin andcofactor metabolism. Brown nodes:nucleotide andprotein metabolism. Green nodes:lipid metabolism.
General
Producers
Consumers
Decomposers
Microorganisms
Food webs
Example webs
Processes
Defense,
counter
Ecology:Modelling ecosystems: Other components
Population
ecology
Species
Species
interaction
Spatial
ecology
Niche
Other
networks
Other
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Photosynthesis&oldid=1321821176"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp