Peter Navarro | |
|---|---|
 Official portrait, 2017 | |
| Senior Counselor to the President for Trade and Manufacturing | |
| Assumed office January 20, 2025 | |
| President | Donald Trump |
| Preceded by | Position established |
| Director of theOffice of Trade and Manufacturing Policy | |
| In office April 29, 2017 – January 20, 2021 | |
| President | Donald Trump |
| Preceded by | Position established |
| Succeeded by | Position abolished |
| Director of theNational Trade Council | |
| In office January 20, 2017 – April 29, 2017 | |
| President | Donald Trump |
| Preceded by | Position established |
| Succeeded by | Position abolished |
| Personal details | |
| Born | Peter Kent Navarro (1949-07-15)July 15, 1949 (age 76) Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. |
| Political party | Democratic (before 1986; 1994–2018) Independent (1986–1989; 1991–1994) Republican (1989–1991; 2018–present) |
| Spouse | |
| Education | Tufts University (BA) Harvard University (MPA,PhD) |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Economics |
| Thesis | A theoretical and empirical investigation of corporate charity motives (1986) |
| Doctoral advisor | Richard E. Caves |
| Notable students | Puma Shen |
Peter Kent Navarro (born July 15, 1949) is an American economist who has been thesenior counselor for trade and manufacturing to U.S. presidentDonald Trump since January 2025. He previously served in thefirst Trump administration, first as the director of theWhite House National Trade Council, then as the director of the newOffice of Trade and Manufacturing Policy.
Navarro is a professoremeritus ofeconomics andpublic policy at thePaul Merage School of Business of theUniversity of California, Irvine. Navarroran unsuccessfully for office in San Diego, California, five times. In January 2017, he joined thefirst Trump administration as an advisor on trade. As a senior administration official, Navarro encouraged President Trump to implementprotectionist trade policies. In particular, he advocated for hardline policies towards China and was a key figure behindthe administration's trade war against China; he wassanctioned by China after leaving office. During his final year in the Trump administration, Navarro was involved in theadministration's COVID-19 response. He was also named the nationalDefense Production Act policy coordinator in 2020. Early on, he issued private warnings within the administration about the threat posed by the virus, but downplayed the risks in public. He publicly clashed withAnthony Fauci, the director of theNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as Navarro advocatedhydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 and condemned various public health measures that aimed to stop the spread of the virus.
Navarrosought to overturn the 2020 presidential election and in February 2022 was subpoenaed twice by Congress. Navarro refused to comply and was referred to theJustice Department. In 2022, agrand juryindicted him on two counts ofcontempt of Congress. In 2023, Navarro was convicted on both counts, and in 2024, he was sentenced to four months in jail, becoming the first former White House official imprisoned on acontempt-of-Congress conviction. In January 2025, he was appointed as the senior counselor for trade and manufacturing for President Trump inhis second term. In his second term, Navarro became a key official behind Trump's trade policies, including theimposition of tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico as well as the "reciprocal tariff" policy announced in April 2025.
Navarro's views on trade are significantly outside the mainstream of economic thought, and are widely consideredfringe by other economists.[1][2][3][4][5] A strong proponent of reducingU.S. trade deficits, Navarro is well known for his hardline views on China, describing the country as an existential threat to the United States. He has accused China of unfair trade practices andcurrency manipulation and called for more confrontational policies towards the country.[6] He has called for increasing the size of theAmerican manufacturing sector, setting hightariffs, and "repatriating global supply chains". He is also a vocal opponent offree trade agreements. Navarro has written books includingThe Coming China Wars (2006) andDeath by China (2011). In several of his books, Navarro quoted a fictional economist named "Ron Vara", ananagram of his surname, as a source of information.[7]
Navarro was born on July 15, 1949, inCambridge, Massachusetts.[8] He is of Italian descent.[9] His father, Albert "Al" Navarro, asaxophonist andclarinetist, led ahouse band, which played summers inNew Hampshire and winters inFlorida.[10] After his parents divorced when he was 9 or 10,[11] he lived with his mother, Evelyn Littlejohn, aSaks Fifth Avenue secretary, inPalm Beach, Florida.[11][12] As a teen, he lived with his mother and brother in a one-bedroom apartment inBethesda, Maryland. Navarro attendedBethesda-Chevy Chase High School.[11]
Navarro attendedTufts University on an academic scholarship,[13] graduating in 1972 with aBachelor of Arts degree.[14] He then spent three years from 1973 to 1976 in theU.S. Peace Corps, serving inThailand,[15][16] traveling toLaos,South Korea,Japan,India,Myanmar andMalaysia during his holiday breaks.[17] According toThe San Diego Union-Tribune, Navarro recalled listening toVoice of America and hearingJimmy Carter'spresidential campaign on a "message of hope".[18] He received aMaster of Public Administration fromHarvard University'sJohn F. Kennedy School of Government in 1979, and aPhD ineconomics from Harvard in 1986 under the supervision ofRichard E. Caves.[16] His doctoral dissertation was titled "A theoretical and empirical investigation of corporate charity motives".[19]
From 1981 through 1985, he was a research associate at Harvard's Energy and Environmental Policy Center. From 1985 through 1988, he taught at theUniversity of California, San Diego and theUniversity of San Diego.[20][16] In 1989 he moved to theUniversity of California, Irvine, as a professor of economics and public policy. He continued on the UC Irvine faculty for more than 20 years and is now aprofessor emeritus.[21] He has worked on energy issues and the relationship between the United States and Asia.[22] He has received multiple teaching awards forMBA courses he has taught.[23]
As a doctoral student in 1984, Navarro wrote a book entitledThe Policy Game: How Special Interests and Ideologues are Stealing America, which claimed that special interest groups had led the United States to "a point in its history where it cannot grow and prosper." In the book, he also called for greater workers' compensation to help those who had lost jobs to trade and foreign competition and wrote that "as history has painfully taught, once protectionist wars begin, the likely result is a deadly and well-nigh unstoppable downward spiral by the entire world economy".[18] His doctoral dissertation on why corporations donate to charity is one of his most cited works. He has also done research on the topic ofwind energy with Frank Harris, a former student of his.[24]
While teaching at UC Irvine, Navarro unsuccessfully ran for office five times inSan Diego, California.[15][20] During his campaigns, he primarily focused on limiting the number of houses in the city as well as the number of immigrants.[18] In 1992, heran for mayor, finishing first (38.2%) in the primary, but lost with 48% toSusan Golding in the runoff.[25] Navarro ran on a no-growth platform during his mayoral campaign.[26] He paid $4,000 in fines and court costs for violating city and state election laws.[14]
In 1993, Navarro ran for San Diego city council, and in 1994 for San Diego County board of supervisors, losing each time.[20] In 1996, he ran for the49th Congressional District as theDemocratic Party nominee, touting himself as an environmental activist, but lost to RepublicanBrian Bilbray, 52.7% to 41.9%.[27][14] In 2001, Navarro ran in a special election to fill the District 6 San Diego city council seat but lost in a special election with 7.85% of the vote.[28]
Navarro has written more than a dozen books on various topics in economics, specializing in the balance of trade. He has published peer-reviewed economics research on energy policy, charity, deregulation, and the economics of trash collection.[29][30][31]The Economist magazine wrote that Navarro "is a prolific writer, but has no publications in top-tier academic journals" and "his research interests are broader than the average economist's."[24] In 2001 Navarro started writing investing books includingIf It's Raining in Brazil, Buy Starbucks: The Investor's Guide to Profiting from News and Other Market-Moving Events.[32]
Navarro focused his attention on China in the mid-2000s.[33] Navarro has said that he started to examine China when he noticed that his former students at UC Irvine were losing jobs, concluding that China was at fault and said that "all roads began leading to Beijing".[33][18] He wrote that China was flooding the U.S. with cheap goods, "thereby beginning to put Americans like my MBA students out of work."[18] He then tasked his students to research how China was able to price their products more cheaply compared to the rest of the world.[17]
His first publication on the subject is the 2006 bookThe Coming China Wars, a book published byFinancial Times in 2006[34] In the book, Navarro examined China as an emerging world power confronting challenges at home and abroad as it struggles to exert itself in theglobal market. He discussed how China's role in international commerce created conflicts with nations worldwide over energy, natural resources, the environment,intellectual property, and other issues. A review inPublishers Weekly described the book as "comprehensive" and "contemporary" and concluded that it "will teach readers to understand the dragon, just not how to vanquish it".[35]
InDeath by China, published in 2011, Navarro and co-authorGreg Autry argued that China violatesfair trade by "illegal export subsidies and currency manipulation, effectively flooding the U.S. markets" and unfairly making it "virtually impossible" for American companies to compete.[36] It is a critique of "global capitalism", including foreign labor practices and environmental protection.[37] Currency manipulation and subsidies are stated as reasons that "American companies cannot compete because they're not competing with Chinese companies, they're competing with the Chinese government."[38]The Economist wrote that "the core allegations Mr. Navarro makes against China are not all that controversial. He accuses China of keeping its currency cheap" and "He deplores China's practice of forcing American firms to hand overintellectual property as a condition of access to its market. He claims that Chinese firms pollute the environment more freely and employ workers in far worse conditions than American rules allow."[24] In 2012, Navarro directed and producedDeath by China, adocumentary film based on his book.[39] The film, described as "fervently anti-China",[40] was narrated byMartin Sheen.
According to Navarro, his first contact withDonald Trump came after a 2011 blog post in theLos Angeles Times that described Trump's supposed 20 favorite books on China, which includedDeath by China. Though whether the interview is authentic is uncertain, it still prompted an exchange of messages with Trump.[17] Navarro received a letter as a reply by Trump assistantRhona Graff, with the letter containing Trump's handwritten notes. Navarro continued to exchange notes with Trump through Graff afterwards.[41] In 2016, Navarro served as an economic policy adviser to Trump's2016 presidential campaign.[42] Navarro was invited to be an advisor after Trump's advisor and son-in-lawJared Kushner saw onAmazon that he co-wroteDeath by China.[43] In his memoirBreaking History, Kushner wrote that he liked the thesis ofDeath by China so much that he hired the "eccentric former professor" as the Trump campaign's trade adviser.[18]
According to Navarro's memoir, he was strolling on Victoria Beach near his home inLaguna Beach, California, when he got a call fromStephen Miller; they talked about an upcoming Trump speech in Pittsburgh that blamed globalization for the shuttering of steel mills; Navarro called the speech "pure MAGA magic". During the campaign, Navarro advocated for anisolationist andprotectionist American foreign policy.[44] Miller was the primary advocate for having Navarro join the campaign full time.[41] Navarro was given an office on the 14th floor ofTrump Tower, where he worked on economic plans that heavily focused on starting a trade war against China.[18] Navarro and the international private equity investorWilbur Ross authored an economic plan for the Trump campaign in September 2016.[15][45] When told that theTax Policy Center assessment of Trump's economic plan said it would reduce federal revenues by $6 trillion and reduce economic growth in the long term, Navarro said that the analysis demonstrated "a high degree of analytical and political malfeasance".[46] When thePeterson Institute for International Economics estimated that Trump's economic plan would cost millions of Americans their jobs, Navarro said that writers at the Peterson Institute "weave a false narrative and they come up with some phony numbers."[47]
According toMIT economistSimon Johnson, the economic plan essay authored by Navarro and Ross for Trump during the campaign had projections "based on assumptions so unrealistic that they seem to have come from a different planet. If the United States really did adopt Trump's plan, the result would be an immediate and unmitigated disaster."[48] In October 2016, along with Wilbur Ross andAndrew Puzder, Navarro co-authored an essay titled "Donald Trump's Contract with the American Voter".[49] When 370 economists, including 19Nobel laureates, signed a letter warning against Trump's stated economic policies in November 2016, Navarro said that the letter was "an embarrassment to the corporate offshoring wing of the economist profession who continues to insist bad trade deals are good for America."[50]
According to Navarro, he was initially promised to be appointed as theNational Economic Council, but the position was instead given toGary Cohn.[17] On December 21, 2016, Navarro was selected by President-elect Trump to a newly created position as director of theWhite House National Trade Council.[53] In the first three weeks of his administration, Navarro was not assigned an office on the White House campus and instead had to work out of his house.[54]: 66 Navarro was first allowed to see Trump in the Oval Office in early March; in the meeting, he had a big argument with Cohn.[54]: 67 Early in the administration, Navarro was allied with speechwriterStephen Miller and White House strategistSteve Bannon; the latter had read Navarro's books about China and used his influence on Trump to advance Navarro's views.[18]
In the administration, Navarro was a hawkish advisor on trade, as he encouraged Trump to implement protectionist trade policies.[55][56][57] He was also a key official in theChina–United States trade war and influential in tougher policies towards China.The New York Times wrote in 2019 that Navarro "has managed to exert enormous influence over United States trade policy" in the Trump administration.[55] In explaining his role in the Trump administration, Navarro said that he is there to "provide the underlying analytics that confirm [Trump's] intuition [on trade]. And his intuition is always right in these matters."[3]
In April 2017, the National Trade Council became part of theOffice of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, of which Navarro was appointed Director.[58] By September 2017, the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy had been folded into the National Economic Council by Chief of StaffJohn F. Kelly, which meant that Navarro would report to NEC director Gary Cohn.[59] This was seen as a demotion for Navarro, as he was known to have strongly clashed with Cohn and his views on trade;[60] Navarro later described him as "one of the worst and most treacherous misfits of the entire Trump administration".[18]
In February 2018, several media outlets reported that Navarro's influence in the administration was rising again and that he would likely be promoted from the secondary billet of Deputy Assistant to the President to Assistant to the President, giving Navarro parity with the NEC director.[60][61]Josh Rogin, writing forThe Washington Post, reported that Navarro had used his prior time of lower influence to lead several low-profile policy items, such as working to increase military funding, draftingExecutive Order 13806, and leading the effort to solve a dispute between the United States andQatar over the Open Skies Agreement between the two countries.[62] In March 2018, Cohn left the Trump administration, further solidifying Navarro's influence.[63]
During the campaign, Navarro, together withWilbur Ross, who became Trump'scommerce secretary, designed a $1 trillion infrastructure development plan for Trump's presidential campaign.[64] The plan called for $137 billion in tax credits to private business to induce them to finance the bulk of infrastructure spending. Economists across the political spectrum derided the proposal.[65] Trump released a $1.5 trillion version of this plan in February 2018[66] but the Republican-controlled Congress showed little enthusiasm for the proposal, withThe Hill reporting, "President Trump's infrastructure plan appears to have crashed and burned in Congress".[67]
In June 2018, Navarro said that there was "a special place in hell" for Canadian prime ministerJustin Trudeau, after Trudeau said that Canada would respond to U.S. tariffs against Canada with retaliatory tariffs.[68] Trudeau's remarks and Canada's response to these tariffs were already public and well known when Navarro made this comment.[69] Navarro later apologized.[70] In 2018, Navarro supported the United States Fair and Reciprocal Tariff Act, which would have given the President sweeping powers over trade policy.[71] He lobbied heavily in theUnited States Congress for the bill and its successor called the United States Reciprocal Trade Act, though the act ultimately did not pass.[41] In May 2019, Navarro said that Trump's decision to place tariffs on Mexico unless Mexico stopped illegal immigration to the United States was "a brilliant move".[72]
In February 2020, it was reported that Navarro was conducting his own investigation into the identity of the author ofan anonymous op-ed inThe New York Times criticizing the Trump Administration.[73] TheUnited States Office of Special Counsel ruled in December 2020 that Navarro repeatedly violated theHatch Act by using his official capacity to influence elections in speaking against Trump's opponent Joe Biden during the presidential campaign.[74]
According toChaos Under Heaven, a book byJosh Rogin, Navarro was part of a group of officials that wanted Trump to "speed the downfall" of theChinese Communist Party and that "believed in economic nationalism, the return of manufacturing from abroad, and the protection of domestic industries, even at the expense of free trade".[54]: 27–28 In his 2021 bookIn Trump Time, Navarro wrote that he urged Trump to go "full Sudden Zen" and start an all-out trade war against China. He also described himself as a "one-man China hawk totally without power or allies in a White House filled with a symphony of Wall Street transactionalists and China dove appeasers".[18] In 2018, Navarro was influential in pushing the Trump administration to initiate theChina–United States trade war.[75] After the start of the trade war, Navarro argued that no countries would retaliate against U.S. tariffs "for the simple reason that we are the most lucrative and biggest market in the world". Shortly after the implementation of the tariffs, other countries did implement retaliatory tariffs against the United States, and the World Trade Organization rejected the U.S. tariffs.[76][77]
Navarro clashed frequently with Treasury SecretarySteven Mnuchin, who had a more moderate stance on trade with China; Navarro accused Mnuchin without evidence of having "made millions from Communist China."[18] In May 2018, during a visit to China for trade talks, Navarro and Mnuchin started screaming and cursing at each other on the lawn in front of the Chinese government building where the talks were held after Navarro confronted Mnuchin because he believed that he had been excluded from certain meetings with Chinese officials.[78] During the trip, which was his second ever to China, Navarro was described as having "acted strangely", including by insisting on keeping his luggage with him at all times, wanting to sleep inside theU.S. embassy because he feared hotel surveillance and having "rudely refused to eat the food served to him in official functions".[54]: 197
In October 2018, Navarro supported a proposal by Stephen Miller to stop providing student visas to Chinese nationals, making it impossible for Chinese citizens to study in the United States.[79] In August 2019, Navarro asserted the tariffs of the ongoing China–United States trade war were not hurting Americans. Citing extensive evidence to the contrary,PolitiFact rated Navarro's assertion "Pants on Fire."[80] In September 2019, after Trump tasked him with combatting China's usage of international mail rates to more cheaply ship products into the US, Navarro successfully led a diplomatic effort to the Third Extraordinary Congress of theUniversal Postal Union, where it agreed member countries could opt-in to self-declare their rates starting in July 2020. This agreement arose following repeated threats from the Trump administration to leave the UPU unless global postage rates were changed; at the summit, Navarro claimed that countries like China were unfairly benefitting from international delivery prices, particularly regardinge-commerce deliveries.[81][82]
In October 2019, Navarro defended the trade war with China, saying that the United States was "dealing with a strategic rival – and they are trying to buckle our knees".[83] Navarro continued to advocate for trade restrictionist policies even while the administration was trying to reach a compromise in trade negotiations with China.[84][85][55] Navarro worked with the DHS to initiate a crackdown on counterfeited and pirated e-commerce goods from overseas,[86][87][88][89] and he promoted the administration's actions on the matter.[90][91] Trump signed an executive order on the matter on January 31, 2020.[92] In August 2020, Mnuchin and Navarro started a shouting match in theOval Office in front of Trump about the fate ofTikTok in what was described byThe Washington Post as a "knockdown, drag-out brawl". Mnuchin began arguing that TikTok should be sold to a U.S. company, while Navarro demanded an outright ban on the app.[93]
On January 20, 2021, the Chinese government imposedsanctions against Navarro and 27 other Trump administration officials who "planned, promoted and executed a series of crazy moves, gravely interfered in China's internal affairs, undermined China's interests, offended the Chinese people, and seriously disrupted China-U.S. relations". The sanctions ban them from entering China, including Hong Kong and Macau, and restrict companies and institutions associated with them from doing business in China.[94]
.jpg)
During his final year in the first Trump administration, Navarro was involved in theadministration's COVID-19 response.[95] On January 29, 2020, Navarro issued a memo warning thatnovel coronavirus could "evolv[e] into a full-blownpandemic, imperiling the lives of millions of Americans" and that the "risk of a worst-case pandemic scenario should not be overlooked". He argued for restrictions on travel from China.[96][97] Navarro wrote another memo on February 23, 2020, arguing that the disease "could infect as many as 100 million Americans, with a loss of life of as many as 1–2 million souls" and calling for an "immediate supplemental appropriation of at least $3 billion."[98] At the same time that Navarro issued these private warnings, he publicly stated that the American people had "nothing to worry about" regarding the coronavirus.[99]
On March 27, 2020, Trump appointed Navarro to coordinate the federal government'sDefense Production Act policy response during the coronavirus pandemic.[100][101][102] In this position, Navarro promoted domestic production of coronavirus-related supplies in addition to a general nationalist agenda.[103] He advocated for reducing U.S. reliance on foreign supply chains, stating that "never again should we rely on the rest of the world for our essential medicines and countermeasures."[104][105] Among other statements, he accused China of "profiteering" from the coronavirus[106] and warned of economic disruptions resulting from the virus.[107]
In February 2020, biologistSteven Hatfill became Navarro's advisor with regard to thecoronavirus pandemic.[108] Hatfill was a strong promoter of the malaria drughydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID, even though the drug's effectiveness was unproven.[109][110] By April, Navarro, and the president himself, were touting the drug as a lifesaver.[111] Navarro clashed withAnthony Fauci, the director of theNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, over whether the administration should promote the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat the virus.[110] In July 2020, Navarro touted a widely criticized study as showing that hydroxychloroquine was an effective coronavirus treatment; public health experts pointed to limitations with the study and to the fact that multiple randomized controlled trials failed to conclude that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment.[112][113]
In May 2020, Navarro criticizedstay-at-home orders, arguing that theCOVID-19 lockdowns would kill "many more" people than the coronavirus.[114][115] He frequently referred to the virus as the "China virus" or the "CCP virus"[116] and, in May 2020, accused the Chinese government of sending Chinese citizens to other countries to "seed" the virus.[117] In July 2020,USA Today published an editorial by Navarro under the headline "Anthony Fauci has been wrong about everything I have interacted with him on", after which White House officials disavowed Navarro's attacks. Under criticism for the editorial, the newspaper later published an apologetic statement that read, in part, "several of Navarro's criticisms of Fauci – on the China travel restrictions, the risk from the coronavirus and falling mortality rates – were misleading or lacked context. As such, Navarro's op-ed did not meetUSA Today's fact-checking standards."[118] During a Fox News appearance in March 2021, Navarro echoed a baseless conspiracy theory that Fauci was the "father" of the virus and had used taxpayer money to finance a Chinese laboratory where it was supposedly developed.[119]
In August 2020, administration officials terminated a contract to purchase 42,900ventilators for use in the pandemic that Navarro had directly negotiated for.[120] A USDepartment of Health and Human Services (HHS) spokesperson said the cancellation was "subject to internal HHS investigation and legal review", as an oversight subcommittee of theUS House of Representatives concluded that the government had overpaid for the ventilators by US$500 million.[121]The Washington Post reported in March 2021 that congressional investigators were examining whether Navarro had directed over $1 billion in federal funds for medical supplies to companies of his selection, after President Trump had rejected his recommendations.[122]
In October 2020, two weeks before the presidential elections, Navarro's office in the White House had begun preparing allegations of election fraud.[123] In December 2020, Navarro published a report alleging widespread election fraud.[124] The report repeated discredited conspiracy theories claiming election fraud, including allegations that had been dismissed by the courts and Trump's own election security task force.[125][126] In the report, Navarro wrote that large initial leads by Trump in battleground states, which turned to leads for Biden as vote counting progressed suggested impropriety, Navarro was actually describing the well-known phenomenon of the "blue shift", caused by the fact that mail-in votes in many states cannot be counted on Election Day itself; those votes tend to lean Democratic, so that an Election Night lead by a Republican candidate can turn into a Democratic lead as the later counts come in.[126] In the report, Navarro cited many biased and unreliable sources of information, such asOne America News Network,Newsmax,Steve Bannon's podcastWar Room: Pandemic,John Solomon'sJust the News, andRaheem Kassam'sThe National Pulse, because they provided what he termed "alternative coverage".[126]
On January 2, 2021, Navarro, along withRudy Giuliani andMark Meadows, participated in acall with Georgia election officials in which Trump urged them to overturn the results of the election.[127][128][129] During a January 2, 2021, appearance onJeanine Pirro's Fox News program, Navarro asserted, "[t]hey stole this and we can prove it," and falsely asserted Joe Biden's inauguration could be postponed to allow for an investigation.[130][131]
Navarro and Bannon coordinated an effort on January 6, 2021 – called"The Green Bay Sweep" – with more than 100 Republican state legislators.[132] Navarro later stated, "We spent a lot of time lining up over 100 congressmen, including some senators. It started out perfectly. At 1 p.m. [on January 6],Gosar andCruz did exactly what was expected of them ... My role was to provide the receipts for the 100 congressmen or so who would make their cases… who could rely in part on the body of evidence I'd collected".[133] In the wake of thestorming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, Navarro appeared onFox Business Network'sMaking Money on January 8, telling hostCharles Payne that Trump was not to blame and specifically saying thatLindsey Graham,Nikki Haley, andMitt Romney "need to shut up".[134] Days later, Navarro reiterated false claims that Trump had won the election.[135][136]
Later in 2021, Navarro publishedIn Trump Time, a book in which he describes how he, Bannon, and others worked to delay or overturnCongress's counting of the election votes formalizing Biden's victory, in part through afailed scheme to try to get Pence to "reject" electoral votes for Biden, something Pence had no power to do.[137] In December 2021, Navarro was still claiming that his falsehoods were meant "to lay the legal predicate for the actions to be taken", despite no evidence of voting fraud being found.[133]
On February 9, 2022, theHouse Select Committee on the January 6 Attack subpoenaed Navarro to provide documents and testimony.[138] He refused to do so and ignored both subpoenas. He made media appearances to defend this behavior in the press. He claimed that Trump was assertingexecutive privilege on his behalf, so he was exempt from the subpoenas – although, in fact, the president in office,Joe Biden, had possessed sole discretion to assert executive privilege since the end of the Trump administration, and had not done so on Navarro's behalf. Moreover, despite Navarro's claims in the news media, he did not identify any supporting evidence that Trump had even attempted to assert the privilege on his behalf.[137] Ultimately, Navarro ignored all requirements of both subpoenas without effectively asserting any legally cognizable privilege or exemption. On April 6, 2022, the House of Representatives voted to hold Navarro andDan Scavino in contempt for their refusals to testify before the House Select Committee based on executive privilege claims.[139] In May 2022, Navarro said he had been subpoenaed by afederal grand jury and ordered to surrender any documents he had related to theJanuary 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.[140][141] Navarro unsuccessfully sought to block both the House committee's subpoena and the grand jury subpoena.[141]
On June 2, 2022, a grand jury impaneled in theUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia indicted Navarro on two counts ofcontempt of Congress.[142] Count 1 of the indictment alleged Navarro refused to comply with a subpoena to produce documents; Count 2 alleged refusal to comply with a subpoena for testimony.[138] Under the applicable law (2 U.S.C. § 192) each count is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year imprisonment.[143] Navarro was arrested bydeputy U.S. marshals atReagan National Airport as he was about to board a plane toNashville.[144][145][146] U.S. district judgeAmit Mehta on July 15, 2022, signaled that he agreed that the treatment of Navarro at the outset of the criminal case was "unreasonably harsh," noting that the government did not offer self-surrender to Navarro.[144]
Navarro claimed that Trump had privately asked him to invoke "executive privilege" over the documents sought by the congressional subpoena.[147] In January 2023, Judge Mehta denied Navarro's effort to dismiss the charges against him, writing, "Defendant has failed to come forward with any evidence to support the claimed assertion of privilege. And, because the claimed assertion of executive privilege is unproven, Defendant cannot avoid prosecution for contempt."[147] Mehta noted thatMark Meadows andDan Scavino (two other Trump advisors whom the House committee had also sought to prosecute for contempt) had produced letters from Trump, in which he directed them to assert executive privilege on his behalf. DOJ chose not to prosecute Meadows and Scavino, and Mehta cited Navarro's failure to produce any similar letter from Trump.[147] Mehta also rejected Navarro's bid to argue that the congressional subpoena was procedurally invalid.[147] In a pretrial hearing in August 2023, Navarro claimed that Trump had told him in a February 2022 phone call not to testify to the House committee but failed to produce any evidence of what Trump actually said in the conversation. Trump had already said he would not testify at Navarro's trial.[148] Two days later, Judge Mehta ruled that Navarro could not claim an "executive privilege" not to testify before the House committee. After the ruling against him, Navarro tried – and failed – to grab a demonstrator's "Trump lost" sign from her at a press conference outside the courthouse.[149]
On September 5, 2023, a jury was seated.[150] Three former congressional committee staffers testified as prosecution witnesses; Navarro declined to testify in his own defense[151][152] or to offer any witnesses for the defense.[152] Navarro'scriminal defense lawyer wasStanley Woodward Jr.[151] Navarro told reporters that he expected to face legal bills of $750,000. He later said that Trump helped pay $300,000 and while he raised more in an appeal on a website.[18] After a two-day trial, Navarro was convicted on both counts ofcontempt of Congress; the jury rejected Navarro's argument that he had not willfully refused to comply with the subpoena.[151][153] Navarro was the second ex-Trump aide to be convicted of contempt of Congress; Bannon had been convicted of the same offense the preceding year.[153] On January 16, 2024, a federal judge denied Navarro's request for a new trial.[154]
Navarro filed an appeal.[155] Judge Mehta[156] and the appeals court[157] denied his request to stay out of prison during the appeal. On September 7, 2023, Navarro was convicted on both counts and on January 25, 2024, he was sentenced to four months in jail and fined $9,500, becoming the first former White House official ever imprisoned oncontempt of Congress conviction.[158] He was ordered to report to aminimum-security federal prison in Miami, Florida by March 19, 2024.[159][160][161][162] Navarro appealed to theSupreme Court to stay the order, but Chief JusticeJohn Roberts rejected the appeal on March 18 in a single-paragraphin-chambers opinion.[163][164] Navarro spent March 19 – July 17 incarcerated in the elderly prisoner unit of a U.S. Federal penitentiary.[165][166] While in prison, he asked to spend the final 30 days of his sentence on supervised release, but Mehta denied his request.[167] During Navarro's prison stay, he was visited by Trump's sonDonald Jr., according to hisprison consultantSam Mangel.[168][169]
Navarro was released on July 17, 2024.[170] Within hours of being released from prison, Navarro gave a prime time speech endorsing Trump for a second term at the2024 Republican National Convention inMilwaukee, Wisconsin.[171] In the convention, Navarro said "The J6 committee demanded that I betray Donald John Trump to save my own skin. I refused."[18] In 2025, interim U.S. Attorney for the District of ColumbiaEd Martin demoted Elizabeth Aloi and John Crabb Jr., who worked as prosecutors in Navarro's case, to low-level positions.[18] Navarro stated that he is not seeking a pardon from President Trump.[172]
In August 2022, the Department of Justice sued Navarro in theU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking to compel him to produce official business-related emails from a personalProtonMail account that he used to conduct White House business. After Trump left office in January 2021, Navarro refused requests from the National Archives to return the records, demanding immunity before he would release the emails.[173][174] Navarro acknowledged that he had kept between 200 and 250 records that belonged to the government but claimed that there were no legal means to require him to return the records to the National Archives and that producing the emails would infringe his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.[175]
In March 2023, U.S. district judgeColleen Kollar-Kotelly ordered Navarro to promptly turn over the records, ruling that Navarro had a "plain" duty to turn over the records to NARA under thePresidential Records Act, which requires government business-related messages on personal accounts to be forwarded to official accounts within 20 business days.[176] Navarro appealed to theU.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In April 2023, the D.C. Circuit unanimously denied Navarro's request for a stay of the district court's order, writing: "There is no public interest in Navarro's retention of the records, and Congress has recognized that the public has an interest in the Nation's possession and retention of Presidential records."[175] After the appeals court denied Navarro's stay request, Judge Kollar-Kotelly ordered Navarro to turn over the 200 to 250 records and to conduct searches for additional presidential records.[175] In February 2024, Kollar-Kotelly said she would appoint a magistrate judge and consider holding Navarro in contempt to ensure his compliance.[177]
On December 4, 2024,President-electDonald Trump announced Navarro would be the senior counselor for trade and manufacturing in his second term.[178] He is one of the few officials from Trump's first term to return for his second term.[179] He assumed office on January 20, 2025.[180]
.jpg)
In January 2025, amidst Trump's threats to put tariffs on Canada and Mexico, Navarro called NAFTA a "catastrophe" in an interview and said because "China was so much worse," it was ignored "how bad NAFTA was." He also linked America's problems with illegal immigration to NAFTA, saying since the US started exporting corn to Mexico, many Mexican agricultural workers lost their jobs, sending some to the US.[180] In February 2025, Navarro andStephen Miller were the leading officials in the economic discussions regarding theimposition of tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico.[181][182] Navarro was a key official behind Trump's decision to adopt a trade policy memo on the first day of his presidency, his decision to impose 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports to the U.S., as well as his decision to adopt so-called "reciprocal tariffs" for every country.[183] Navarro successfully pushed the Trump administration to close thede minimis duty exemption for China, which allowed Chinese products worth less than $800 to be imported duty free.[18]
TheFinancial Times reported in February 2025 that Navarro proposed expelling Canada from theFive Eyes.[184] A few days later,The Daily Telegraph reported that Navarro pushed US negotiators to start discussions with Canada about reworking and redrawing theUS-Canada border, which reportedly prompted Canada to cease negotiating with the United States untilHoward Lutnick andJamieson Greer were confirmed to their positions by the Senate.[185] Navarro was a key official behind Trump's"reciprocal tariff" policy announced in April;[186]ING Group noted that plans for the policy appeared to align with Navarro's section ofProject 2025, titled "The Case for Fair Trade", published in April 2023.[187]Bloomberg News reported that Navarro urged Trump to adopt a 25% tax on imports or "reciprocal" tariffs based on trade deficits; the latter idea was adopted as part of Trump's announcement.[188]The Wall Street Journal andThe New York Times reported that Navarro played a central role in developing the administration's "reciprocal" tariff formula.[17][189] Navarro predicted the tariffs would raise $6 trillion, a figure disputed byThe Washington Post's Fact Checker.[18]
On April 5, 2025, Navarro was criticized by Trump advisorElon Musk, who the NYT estimated to have lost about $31 billion with the new trade tariffs. Musk questioned his educational qualifications from Harvard onX and wrote "He ain't built shit."[190] In response, Navarro said Musk is not a "car manufacturer" but a "car assembler". On April 8, Musk responded by calling Navarro "a moron" and "dumber than a sack of bricks", and said he should consult"the fake expert he invented, Ron Vara".[191] The higher "reciprocal" tariffs were paused on April 9 for 90 days for all countries except China;The Wall Street Journal reported that Treasury SecretaryScott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick took advantage of Navarro's absence, who was meeting withKevin Hassett, to meet with Trump in theOval Office and convince him to announce a pause on tariffs onTruth Social.[192] That same month, he suggested to the president of pressuringCambodia,Mexico, andVietnam to not trade with China.[193] On May 4, during an interview withThe Daily Telegraph, Navarro accused theUnited Kingdom of being a "compliant servant of communist China" and said "If the Chinese vampire can't suck the American blood, it's going to suck the U.K. blood and the EU blood".[194]
Navarro has been criticized multiple times for the Trump administration's tariffs against India. On August 7,Kaitlan Collins questioned Navarro on why the U.S. was doubling tariffs on Indian goods over Russian oil imports while not imposing similar penalties on China, which imports more. Navarro responded that China already faced 50% tariffs and warned that increasing them further could harm U.S. interests. Former National Security AdviserJohn Bolton criticized Navarro’s explanation, stating that the tariff policy risked damaging U.S.-India relations and undermining decades of American efforts to align India away from Russia and China.[195][196] Bolton later alleged that Navarro had attempted to provoke tensions between Trump andNarendra Modi during a meeting that was intended to focus on strategic issues such as "dealing with China." Bolton described the incident as a sideshow, adding, "If you left Peter alone in a room and came back an hour later, he would be in an argument with himself."[197] On August 18, 2025, Navarro criticized India’s continued purchases of Russian crude oil, calling them “opportunistic” and accusing India of acting as a “global clearinghouse” for embargoed Russian energy. Writing in theFinancial Times, Navarro argued that India was undermining international efforts to isolate Russia and warned that if India “wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one.”[198] On August 21, economistJeffrey Sachs, while condemning the Trump administration’s 50% tariffs on Indian goods as “the stupidest tactical move in U.S. foreign policy,” described Navarro as “probably the most incompetent PhD” from his former department, asserting that the policy backfired by weakening U.S.-India relations and strengthening BRICS solidarity.[199][200] Later, Navarro described the Russia-Ukraine conflict as “Modi’s war,” linking India’s purchase of discounted Russian oil to support for Russia’s military efforts. In response, journalistRick Sanchez dismissed Navarro’s remarks as “absolutely laughable,” criticizing his understanding of geopolitics and arguing that such statements reflect a broader lack of awareness.[201][202] Navarro further doubled down on these comments in an August 31 interview onFox News, where he described Indian purchases of Russian oil as "Brahmins profiteering at the expense of the Indian people".[203]
In September 2025, Navarro dismissed X’sCommunity Notes as “propaganda” after the platform fact-checked his posts accusing India of profiteering from Russian oil and imposing tariffs that he claimed hurt U.S. jobs.Elon Musk defended the system as neutral and open to all perspectives, while the fact-checks reportedly highlighted that India’s oil purchases were legal, did not violate sanctions, and served energy security needs.[204][205][206] Navarro then accused Indian users of manipulating the platform and called them "keyboard minions".[207]
.jpg)
Navarro has been a staunch critic of relations and trade with China and a strong proponent of reducing U.S. trade deficits. He has attacked Germany, Japan, and China for their currency manipulation. An advocate of protectionist policies, he has called for increasing the size of the American manufacturing sector, setting high tariffs, and repatriating global supply chains. He was a fierce opponent of theTrans-Pacific Partnership.[208]
Navarro's views on trade are considered outside the mainstream of economic thought.[209] According toBloomberg News, Navarro had "roots as a mainstream economist"; he voiced support for free trade in his 1984 bookThe Policy Game. He changed his positions as he saw "theglobalist erosion of the American economy" develop.[3] He would later become a critic of theNorth American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).[60] According toPolitico, Navarro's economic theories are "considered fringe" by his fellow economists.[210] ANew Yorker reporter described Navarro's views on trade and China as so radical "that, even with his assistance, I was unable to find another economist who fully agrees with them."[211]
The Economist described Navarro as having "oddball views".[212] TheGeorge Mason University economistTyler Cowen has described Navarro as "one of the most versatile and productive American economists of the last few decades", but Cowen noted that he disagreed with his views on trade, which he claimed to go "against a strong professional consensus."[210]University of Michigan economistJustin Wolfers described Navarro's views as "far outside the mainstream," noting that "he endorses few of the key tenets of" the economics profession.[1] According to Lee Branstetter, economics professor atCarnegie Mellon University and trade expert with thePeterson Institute for International Economics, Navarro "was never a part of the group of economists who ever studied the global free-trade system... He doesn't publish in journals. What he's writing and saying right now has nothing to do with what he got his Harvard Ph.D. in... He doesn't do research that would meet the scientific standards of that community."[213] Marcus Noland, an economist at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, described a tax and trade paper written by Navarro and Wilbur Ross for Trump as "a complete misunderstanding of international trade, on their part."[46]
In 2023, Navarro co-authored the chapter on trade for the ninth edition of theHeritage Foundation's bookMandate for Leadership, which provides the policy agenda forProject 2025.[214] The chapter, called "The Case for Fair Trade" is part of a dueling chapter on trade policy in which Navarro argues for tariffs and trade restrictions while other authors argue for free trade. The chapter details Navarro's plans to counter China through trade policy.[215] In the chapter, Navarro writes "America's record on trade – specifically America's chronic and ever-expanding trade deficit – says that America is the globe's biggest trade loser and a victim of unfair, unbalanced, and nonreciprocal trade".[179] His view is that the tariff adjustments will spur the economy in the long run and yield enough revenue to pay for tax cuts.[216]
Navarro's political affiliations and policy positions are "hotly disputed and across the spectrum." While he lived in Massachusetts studying for his PhD at Harvard, he was a registered Democrat. When he moved to California in 1986, he was initially registered as nonpartisan and became a registered Republican in 1989.[217] By 1991, he had again re-registered as an Independent, and carried that affiliation during the 1992 San Diego mayoral election. Around this time, he still considered himself a conservative Republican.[218] Navarro rejoined the Democratic Party in 1994 and remained a Democrat during each of his subsequent political campaigns.[217] In 1996, while he was running for Congress, Navarro was endorsed by then-First LadyHillary Clinton and spoke at the1996 Democratic National Convention, saying, "I'm proud to be carrying theClinton-Gore banner." He positioned himself as a "strong environmentalist and a progressive on social issues such aschoice,gay rights, andreligious freedom."[14][219][220]
Navarro supported Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2008.[13] Navarro supported PresidentBarack Obama'sphase-out of incandescent light bulbs, the adoption ofwind power, andcarbon taxes in order to stopglobal warming.[221] During the2016 presidential election, Navarro described himself as "aReagan Democrat and aTrump Democrat abandoned by my party."[222] Despite this, Navarro was critical ofRonald Reagan's defense spending, called GDP growth during the administration a "Failure ofReaganomics"[223] and described the "10-5-3" tax proposal as "a very large corporate subsidy."[224] During the early stage of the Trump administration, Navarro was still known to be a Democrat, but by February 2018 he had again re-registered as a Republican.[85] In the2024 Republican National Convention, Navarro said "Democrats come for your kids. They are indoctrinating them with poisonous attitudes on race and gender."[18]
Navarro supports a tax policy called "border adjustment", which, as commonly used in theVATs of most countries, taxes all imports at the domestic rate while rebating tax on exports, essentially transforming taxes from taxes on production to taxes on consumption.[213] In response to criticism that the border adjustment tax could hurt U.S. companies and put jobs at risk, Navarro called it "fake news".[213]
.jpg)
Navarro is seen as very hawkish on China. According toThe Guardian, Navarro sees China as a "despicable, parasitic, brutal, brass-knuckled, crass, callous, amoral, ruthless and totally totalitarian imperialist power that reigns over the world's leading cancer factory, its most prolific propaganda mill and the biggest police state and prison on the face of the earth".[225] According toPolitico, "Navarro is perhaps the most extreme advocate in Washington, and maybe in all of economics, for an aggressive stance toward China."[210] According toVox, "Aided by cartoonish and frequently offensive stereotypes of the Chinese national character, Navarro tends to believe that there is something fundamentally underhanded and evil about China, regardless of any evidence to the contrary".[226]
InPolitico's description of Navarro's bookThe Coming China Wars, "Navarro uses military language to refer to China's trade policies, referring to its 'conquest' of the world's export markets, which has 'vaporized literally millions of manufacturing jobs and driven down wages.' ... China's aspirations are so insatiable, he claims, that eventually there will be a clash over 'our most basic of all needs – bread, water, and air.'"[34] Navarro has described the entry of China to theWorld Trade Organization as one of the United States' biggest mistakes.[33] To respond to the threat posed to the United States, Navarro has advocated for 43% tariffs, the repudiation of trade pacts, major increases in military expenditures, and strengthened military ties with Taiwan.[33][34]The New York Times notes that "a wide range of economists have warned that curtailing trade with China would damage the American economy, forcing consumers to pay higher prices for goods and services."[31] Navarro has reportedly also encouraged Trump to enact a 25% tariff on Chinese steel imports, something that "trade experts worry... would upend global trade practices and cause countries to retaliate, potentially leading to a trade war".[58]
Navarro has said that a large part of China's competitive advantage over the United States stems from unfair trade practices.[24] Navarro has criticized China for pollution, poor labor standards, government subsidies, producing "contaminated, defective and cancerous" exports, currency manipulation, and theft of US intellectual property.[24][227] In his 2012 documentary, Navarro said that China caused the loss of 57,000 US factories and 25 million jobs. Navarro has maintained that China manipulates its currency, and on August 5, 2019, theU.S. Treasury Department officially designated China as a "currency manipulator."[33][228]
Of the more than a dozen China specialists contacted byForeign Policy, most either did not know of Navarro or had only interacted with him briefly.[33] Kenneth Pomeranz,University of Chicago professor of Chinese History, said that his "recollection is that [Navarro] generally avoided people who actually knew something about the country."[33] ColumnistGordon G. Chang was the only China watcher contacted byForeign Policy who defended Navarro, but even he noted that he disagreed with Navarro's claims of currency manipulation, opposition to the TPP, and calls for high tariffs.[33] James McGregor, a former chairman of theAmerican Chamber of Commerce in China, said that Navarro's books and documentary on China "have close to zero credibility with people who know the country," and are filled with "hyperbole, inaccuracies" and a "cartoonish caricature of China that he puts out."[33] Some of Navarro's views on China fit within the mainstream, such as criticism of Chinese currency manipulation (pre-2015), concern that China's rapid ascension to the World Trade Organization harmed theRust Belt, and criticism of China's weak environmental regulations and poor labor standards.[15][24]
In six of his books about China, Navarro quotes a purported trade expert named "Ron Vara", whom he describes as a China hawk and former Harvard PhD doctoral student in economics. Vara makesSinophobic remarks about China and the Chinese, such as "you've got to be nuts to eat Chinese food" and "only the Chinese can turn a leather sofa into an acid bath, a baby crib into a lethal weapon, and a cellphone battery into heart-piercing shrapnel".[229] However, a 2019 investigation by theChronicle of Higher Education found that no such person existed, and that "Ron Vara" (ananagram of Navarro) appeared to represent views that Navarro himself held.[229][230] When he was asked about Vara byThe Chronicle, Navarro admitted to making up the character, anauthor surrogate, and quoting him in his books.[230]
In the wake of the disclosure, many news outlets have referred to Vara as a "fake expert" or "fake economist" (often in their headlines).[231][232][233][234]Prentice Hall, the publisher ofDeath by China, said that it would add a disclaimer to later editions informing readers that Vara was not a real person.[235] EconomistGlenn Hubbard, who co-authoredSeeds of Destruction with Navarro,[236] said that he was not aware that Vara was fictional, and that he disapproved of Navarro attributing information to a fictional source.[237]
In December 2019, a memo purportedly written by Ron Vara began circulating in Washington, D.C. The memo highlighted the "Keep Tariff Argument" and the use of tariffs against China a few days before implementing an additional 15% tariff on $160 billion of Chinese-made goods. Navarro later confirmed that he had written the memo.[238] In response to the "Ron Vara" character,Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China spokespersonHua Chunying accused Navarro of "smearing China with lies".[239]
Navarro drew controversy when he accused Germany of using a "grossly undervalued" euro to "exploit" the rest of the European Union and the United States.[240]Politico noted that the German government does not set the value of the euro.[34] Economists and commentators are divided on the accuracy of Navarro's remarks.[241][242] EconomistPaul Krugman said that Navarro was right and wrong at the same time: "Yes, Germany in effect has an undervalued currency relative to what it would have without the euro... But does this mean that the euro as a whole is undervalued against the dollar? Probably not."[243]
Navarro argues that the decline in US manufacturing jobs is chiefly due to "unfair trade practices and bad trade deals. And if you don't believe that, just go to the booming factories in Germany, in Japan, in Korea, in China, in Malaysia, in Vietnam, in Indonesia, in Italy – every place that we're running deficits with."[244] However, many economists attribute the decline in manufacturing jobs chiefly toautomation and other innovations that allow manufacturing firms to produce more goods with fewer workers, rather than trade.[244][245]
Navarro has been a proponent of strengthening the manufacturing sector's role in the national economy: "We envision a more Germany-style economy, where 20 percent of our workforce is in manufacturing. ... And we're not talking about banging tin in the back room."[213]The New York Times notes that "experts on manufacturing ... doubt that the government can significantly increase factory employment, noting that mechanization is the major reason fewer people are working in factories."[31]
Navarro has criticized theUnited States–South Korea Free Trade Agreement.[246] Navarro called for the United States to leave theNorth American Free Trade Agreement, and tried to convince Trump to initiate a withdrawal.[58] Working together with formerAFL-CIO president,Richard Trumka, a revised NAFTA agreement was put in place during the Trump administration.
Navarro opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Navarro claimed in an April 2015 op-ed, "To woo us, their spinmeisters boast the TPP will spur American exports to stimulate sorely needed economic growth. In truth, the American economy will suffer severely. This is because the TPP will hammer two main drivers of economic growth – domestic investment and 'net exports.'"[247] Navarro said in March 2017 that TPP "would have been a 'death knell' to America's auto and vehicle parts industry that we "urgently need to bring back to full life.'"[227]
Navarro also opposed Australian tariff exemptions; he asserted that "Australia is just killing our aluminum market," and that "what they do is they just flood our markets", despite Australia providing only 2.5% of U.S. aluminum imports.[248][249] Australia ranked only 17th for exports of steel to the U.S. and eighth in exports of aluminum over the past 10 years.
Navarro has framed trade as a national security risk.[34][250] Navarro has characterized foreign purchases of U.S. companies as a threat to national security, but according to NPR, this is "a fringe view that puts him at odds with the vast majority of economists."[251]Dartmouth economistDouglas Irwin noted that the US government already reviews foreign purchases of companies with military or strategic value, and has on occasion rejected such deals.[251] Irwin said that Navarro had not substantiated his claim with any evidence.[251]
Navarro has also said that the United States has "already begun to lose control of [its] food supply chain", which according to NPR, "sounded pretty off-the-wall to a number of economists" who noted that the United States is a massive exporter of food.[251] Dermot Hayes, anagribusiness economist atIowa State University, described Navarro's statement as "uninformed".[251] Navarro has called for repatriating global supply chains.[34][227] According toPolitico's Jacob Heilbrunn, such a move "would be enormously costly and take years to execute".[34] Navarro criticized theoutsourcing of critical materials – like the production of essentialmedical supplies – to China, in light of the onset ofCOVID-19 pandemic in 2020.[252]
Navarro is a proponent of the notion thattrade deficits are bad in and of themselves, a view which is widely rejected by trade experts and economists.[253][254][255] In awhite paper co-authored with Wilbur Ross, Navarro stated, "when a country runs a trade deficit by importing more than it exports, this subtracts from growth."[256] In aWall Street Journal op-ed defending his views, Navarro stated, "If we are able to reduce our trade deficits through tough, smart negotiations, we should be able to increase our growth."[257]
Harvard University economics professorGregory Mankiw has said that Navarro's views on the trade deficit are based on the kind of mistakes that "even a freshman at the end of ec 10 knows."[254][258]Tufts University professorDaniel W. Drezner said about Navarro's op-ed, "as someone who's written on this topic I could not for the life of me understand his reasoning".[259] According toTyler Cowen, "close to no one" in the economics profession agrees with Navarro's idea that a trade deficit is bad in and of itself.[260] Nobel laureateAngus Deaton described Navarro's attitude on trade deficits as "an old-fashioned mercantilist position."[255]
The Economist has described Navarro's views on the trade deficit as "dodgy economics",[24] while theFinancial Times has described them as "poor economics".[261] EconomistsScott Sumner,Olivier Blanchard,[227] and Phil Levy[262] have also criticized Navarro's views on the trade deficit. Dan Ikenson, director of theCato Institute's Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, goes so far as to call Navarro a "charlatan" and says that "99.9 per cent of respectable economists would eschew" what he says: "He says imports deduct from output, and he calls that accounting identity the 'economic growth formula'. He thinks that for every dollar we import, ourGDP is reduced by a dollar. I don't know how he got his PhD at Harvard."[263]
In 2001, Navarro married Leslie Lebon, a California architect. The couple lived inLaguna Beach, with Lebon's son from a previous marriage, while Navarro was a professor at UC Irvine.[264] In late 2018, Lebon filed for divorce inOrange County.[265] Their divorce became final in December 2020.[266] At theRepublican National Convention in July 2024, Navarro announced that he was engaged to a woman named Bonnie.[267]
 | This articlecontains a list that has not been properly sorted. Specifically, it does not follow theManual of Style for lists of works (often, though not always, due to being in reverse-chronological order). SeeMOS:LISTSORT for more information. Pleaseimprove this article if you can.(August 2025) |
the only official who identifies as an economist – Peter Navarro, who earned a Harvard Ph.D. in economics and will head up the newly formed National Trade Council – stands so far outside the mainstream that he endorses few of the key tenets of the profession.
Mr Navarro's views on trade are well outside the mainstream, and he is not a big hitter in academic circles.
Navarro has come a long way from his roots as a mainstream economist.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)'You know what they did and you're not reporting it,' Trump said. 'You know, that's a criminal offense. And you know, you can't let that happen. That's a big risk to you and to Ryan [Germany], your lawyer. That's a big risk.'
)Navarro's views on trade and China are so radical, however, that, even with his assistance, I was unable to find another economist who fully agrees with them.
'As she put it, the joke wears very thin when you get to certain statements about China and the Chinese people that are quite negative,' Bartlett said. 'Ron Vara says things that are pretty over the top, and it's hard to construe them necessarily as whimsical in the way we normally use that word.'
Peter Navarro says foreign companies buying up U.S. corporations are posing a threat to national security.
Navarro's comments drew skepticism from trade experts and economists across the political spectrum"
Navarro and Ross say that getting rid of the trade deficit and boosting investment would also spur faster economic growth, which would bring in $1.74 trillion in tax revenue over a decade.
Media related toPeter Navarro at Wikimedia Commons