Paul Ehrenfest was born on 18 January 1880 inVienna toJewish parents,[3] who were originally fromLoštice inMoravia (now part of theCzech Republic). His parents, Sigmund Ehrenfest and Johanna Jellinek, managed a grocery store. Although the family was not overly religious, Paul studiedHebrew andJewish history. Later, he always emphasized his Jewish ancestry. Ehrenfest excelled in grade school but did not do well at theAkademisches Gymnasium, his best subject beingmathematics. After transferring to theFranz Josef Gymnasium, his marks improved. In 1899, he passed thefinal exams.
He majored inchemistry at theVienna Institute of Technology, but took courses at theUniversity of Vienna, in particular fromLudwig Boltzmann on hiskinetic theory ofthermodynamics. These lectures had a profound influence: they were instrumental in developing Ehrenfest's interest intheoretical physics, defined his main area of research for years to come, and provided an example of inspired teaching. At the time, it was customary in the German-speaking world to study at more than one university, and in 1901, Ehrenfest transferred to University of Göttingen, which until 1933 was an important site for mathematics and theoretical physics. There he met his future wife,Tatyana Afanasyeva, a young mathematician born inKiev (then the capital of theKiev Governorate,Russian Empire) and educated inSt Petersburg. In 1903, he met Dutch physicistHendrik Lorentz during a short visit toLeiden, Netherlands. He wrote his dissertation onDie Bewegung starrer Körper in Flüssigkeiten und die Mechanik von Hertz (The Motion of Rigid Bodies in Fluids and the Mechanics ofHertz)[4] and obtained hisPh.D. on 23 June 1904 in Vienna, where he stayed from 1904 to 1905.
On 21 December 1904, he married Afanasyeva, who collaborated with him in his work. They had two daughters and two sons:Tatyana ('Tanja') (1905–1984) also became a mathematician;Galinka ('Galja') (1910–1979) became an author and illustrator of children's books; Paul, Jr. ('Pavlik') (1915–1939) became a physicist; and Vassily ('Wassik') (1918–1933).[5]
The Ehrenfests returned to Göttingen in September 1906. They did not see Boltzmann again: on 5 September Boltzmann took his own life inDuino nearTrieste. Ehrenfest published an extensive obituary describing Boltzmann's accomplishments.Felix Klein, dean of the Göttingen mathematicians and chief editor of theEnzyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften ("Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences"), had counted on Boltzmann for a review about statistical mechanics. Now he asked Ehrenfest to take on this task. Together with his wife, Ehrenfest worked on it for several years; the article was not published until 1911. It is a review of the work of Boltzmann and his school, and has a style all its own: a sharp logical analysis of the fundamental hypotheses, clear delineation of unsolved questions, and an explanation of general principles by cleverly chosen transparent examples.
In 1907, the couple relocated to St. Petersburg. Ehrenfest found good friends there, in particular the physicistA.F. Joffe, but felt scientifically isolated. Moreover, because he was unwilling to declare belief in any religious denomination, he could not apply for a professorship and therefore had no prospect of securing a permanent position.[6] In 1912, Ehrenfest touredGerman-speaking universities in the hope of a position. He visited Berlin, where he sawMax Planck;Leipzig, where he met his old friend German mathematicianGustav Herglotz;Munich, where he met theoretical physicistArnold Sommerfeld;Zürich; and Vienna. InPrague he met Albert Einstein for the first time, and they remained close friends thereafter. Einstein recommended that Ehrenfest succeed him in his position in Prague, but the plan failed since Ehrenfest declared himself an atheist.[7][8] Sommerfeld offered him a position in Munich, but Ehrenfest received a better offer; at the same time there was an unexpected turn of events: H. A. Lorentz resigned his position at theUniversity of Leiden, and on his advice, Ehrenfest was appointed as his successor.
In October 1912, Ehrenfest arrived in Leiden, and on 4 December, he gave his inaugural lecture,Zur Krise der Lichtaether-Hypothese (About the crisis of the light-ether hypothesis). He remained in Leiden for the rest of his career. To stimulate interaction and exchange among physics students, Ehrenfest organized a discussion group and a study association calledDe Leidsche Flesch ("TheLeyden jar"). He maintained close contact with prominent physicists in the country and abroad, and invited them to visit Leiden and give presentations in his lecture series.[9] Ehrenfest was an outstanding debater, quick to point out weaknesses and summarize the essentials.
In his lectures, Ehrenfest emphasized simple models and examples to illustrate and clarify basic assumptions. His classes were small, and he made an effort to get to know students who made use of the reading room.[10] Though few of them were accepted as majors in theoretical physics, he had long discussions with them almost daily. According to Einstein:
He was not merely the best teacher in our profession whom I have ever known; he was also passionately preoccupied with the development and destiny of men, especially his students. To understand others, to gain their friendship and trust, to aid anyone embroiled in outer or inner struggles, to encourage youthful talent—all this was his real element, almost more than his immersion in scientific problems.[11]
Going by his correspondence with his friends, it seems that Ehrenfest suffered from severedepression at latest by May 1931. By August 1932, Einstein was so worried that he wrote to the Board of the University of Leiden, expressing concern and suggesting ways in which Ehrenfest's workload could be reduced.
Having made arrangements for the care of his other children, on 25 September 1933, inAmsterdam, Ehrenfest fatally shot his younger son Wassik, who hadDown syndrome, then killed himself.[14][15]
Most of Ehrenfest's scientific papers deal primarily with fundamentals, and seek to clarify single sub-topics. His publications are renowned for their lucidity and directness, and for solvingparadoxes by providing clearer descriptions. His method is best illustrated by what he wrote to Robert Oppenheimer in the summer of 1928, after Oppenheimer invited himself for an extended stay in Leiden:
If you intend to mount heavy mathematical artillery again during your coming year in Europe, I would ask you not only not to come to Leiden, but if possible not even to Holland, and just because I am really so fond of you and want to keep it that way. But if, on the contrary, you want to spend at least your first few months patiently, comfortably, and joyfully in discussions that keep coming back to the same few points, chatting about a few basic questions with me and our young people—and without thinking much about publishing (!!!)—why then I welcome you with open arms!![16]
Characteristically, he did not like the abstraction of the newquantum theory of Heisenberg and Dirac.
Ehrenfest was also interested in developing mathematical theories for economics. This interest was stimulated by his notion that there should be an analogy between thermodynamics and economic processes. While this did not result in publications, he did encourage his graduate studentJan Tinbergen to research this. Tinbergen's thesis was devoted to problems from both physics and economics, and he later became an economist and was awarded the firstNobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1969.
Ehrenfest was particularly close to both Einstein and Bohr. After Niels Bohr's first visit to Leiden in 1919, forHans Kramers' thesis defense, he wrote to Ehrenfest:
I am sitting and thinking of all what you have told me about so very many different things, and whatever I think of I feel that I have learned so much from you which will be of great importance for me; but, at the same time, I wish so much to express my feeling of happiness over your friendship and of thankfulness for the confidence and sympathy you have shown me, I find myself so utterly incapable of finding words for it.[11]
On his invitation Einstein accepted in 1920 an appointment asextraordinary professor at the University of Leiden. This arrangement allowed Einstein to visit Leiden for a few weeks every year. At these occasions Einstein would stay at Ehrenfest's home. In 1923 Einstein stayed there for six weeks, after German ultra-nationalists in Berlin had made threats against his life.On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Lorentz' doctorate (December 1925) Ehrenfest invited both Bohr and Einstein over to Leiden, in an attempt to reconcile their scientific differences about the emerging quantum theory.These discussions were continued at the 1927Solvay Conference, where Ehrenfest much to his dismay preferred Bohr's argument in this great debate.
Ehrenfest used colourful German language in his physics lectures:[20]
Das ist der springende Punkt (translation: That is the crucial point) Das ist wo der Frosch ins Wasser springt (That is where the frog jumps into the water) Das ist der Patentanspruch (That is the patent claim, the essence) Da hat Herr ... schliesslich die Ratte aus der Suppe gezogen (There Mr. X finally pulled the rat out of the soup) [when a scientist had solved a messy problem] Je besser man's versteht um so besser steht es dort (The better one understands, the better it is written there) [Ehrenfest's comment when Dirac was asked in writing for an explanation of his work, and Dirac characteristically simply reproduced exactly his previous explanation]
The monthly evening colloquium in physics at Leiden University Ehrenfest initiated in 1912 at his house continues with the nameColloquium Ehrenfestii.[21]
^Jaeger, Gregg (1 May 1998). "The Ehrenfest Classification of Phase Transitions: Introduction and Evolution".Archive for History of Exact Sciences.53 (1):51–81.doi:10.1007/s004070050021.S2CID121525126.
^Sigmund, Karl (2017).Exact thinking in demented times: the Vienna Circle and the epic quest for the foundations of science. New York: Basic Books. p. ch. 4.ISBN9780465096954.
^Ronald Clark (2011).Einstein: The Life and Times. Bloomsbury Publishing.ISBN9781448202706.That Einstein's attitude was the result more of muddle than agnostic scruple seems clear from a letter which he wrote less than two years later when Paul Ehrenfest ruled himself out from becoming Einstein's successor by roundly declaring himself an atheist.
^Thomas Levenson (2004).Einstein in Berlin. Random House of Canada. p. 172.ISBN9780553378443.The man he had hoped would succeed him in Prague, Paul Ehrenfest, refused to compromise his true atheist's principles. Einstein scolded him. "Your refusal to acknowledge a religious affiliation" was just this side of "willful stupidity", he assured him, with the benefit of recent experience. Once he became a professor Ehrenfest could revert to unbelief.
^Van Lunteren, F. H.; Hollestelle, M. J. (September 2013). "Paul Ehrenfest and the Dilemmas of Modernity".Isis.104 (3):504–36.doi:10.1086/673271.PMID24341262.S2CID24103865.
^Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (n.d.)."Paul Ehrenfest (1880–1933)".KNAW Past Members. Retrieved27 February 2020.
^Farmelo, Graham (2009).The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Quantum Genius. Faber and Faber. p. 232.ISBN978-0-571-22278-0.
^Trogemann, Georg; Nitussov, Alexander Y.; Ernst, Wolfgang (2001)."Paul Ehrenfest".Computing in Russia: the history of computer devices and information technology revealed. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. p. 60.ISBN978-3-528-05757-2. Retrieved15 June 2009.
^Jammer, Max (1966-01-01). "3.1 Quantum Conditions and the Adiabatic Principle".The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (First ed.). McGraw-Hill.ISBN978-0-07-032275-2.
^Jaeger, Gregg (1 May 1998). "The Ehrenfest Classification of Phase Transitions: Introduction and Evolution".Archive for History of Exact Sciences.53 (1):51–81.doi:10.1007/s004070050021.S2CID121525126.