| Part ofa series on |
| Books of the New Testament |
|---|
_fol._142r_-_2_Corinthians_11%2c33-12%2c9.jpg) Papyrus 46, one of the oldestNew Testament papyri, showing 2 Cor 11:33–12:9 |
| Part ofa series of articles on |
| Paul in the Bible |
|---|
 |
Thepastoral epistles are a group of three books of thecanonicalNew Testament: theFirst Epistle to Timothy (1 Timothy), theSecond Epistle to Timothy (2 Timothy), and theEpistle to Titus. They are presented as letters fromPaul the Apostle toTimothy and toTitus. However, many scholars believe they were written after Paul's death. They are generally discussed as a group and are given the titlepastoral because they are addressed to individuals with pastoral oversight of churches and discuss issues of Christian living, doctrine and leadership. The term "pastorals" was popularized in 1703 by D. N. Berdot and in 1726 by Paul Anton.[1] Alternate nomenclature for the cluster of three letters has been proposed: "Corpus Pastorale," meant to highlight the intentional forgery of the letters as a three-part corpus,[2] and "Letters to Timothy and Titus," meant to emphasize the individuality of the letters.[3]
1 Timothy consists mainly of counsels to Timothy regarding the forms of worship and organization of the church, and the responsibilities resting on its several members, includingepískopoi (Koine Greek:ἐπίσκοποι,lit. 'overseers', traditionally translated asbishops) anddiákonoi (διάκονοι,'deacons'); and secondly of exhortation to faithfulness in maintaining the truth amid surrounding errors (4:1ff), presented as a prophecy of erring teachersto come. The epistle's "irregular character, abrupt connexions and loose transitions" (Moffatt 1911),[4] have led critics to discern later interpolations, such as the epistle-concluding 6:20–21,[5] read as a reference toMarcion of Sinope, and lines that appear to be marginalglosses that have been copied into the body of the text.
The author (who identifies himself as Paul the Apostle) entreats Timothy to come to him before winter, and to bring Mark with him (cf. Phil. 2:22). He was anticipating that "the time of his departure was at hand" (4:6), and he exhorts his "son Timothy" to all diligence and steadfastness in the face of false teachings, with advice about combating them with reference to the teachings of the past, and to patience under persecution (1:6–15), and to a faithful discharge of all the duties of his office (4:1–5), with all the solemnity of one who was about to appear before the Judge of the living and the dead.
This short letter is addressed to Titus, a Christian worker inCrete, and is traditionally divided into three chapters. It includes advice on the character and conduct required of Church leaders (chapter 1), a structure and hierarchy for Christian teaching within the church (chapter 2), and the kind of godly conduct and moral action required of Christians in response to God's grace and gift of the Holy Spirit (chapter 3). It includes the line quoted by the author from aCretan source: "Cretans are always liars, wicked beasts, and lazy gluttons" (Titus 1:12).
Two papyri contain parts of the Pastoral Epistles:𝔓32 and𝔓61.[6] Pao considersCodex Sinaiticus to be “one of the most reliable witnesses for the [Pastoral Epistles], though it contains a series of unintentional omissions (1 Tim 2:6 [τό]; 3:8 [σεμνούς]; 4:8 [πρός]; Titus 1:13 [ἐν]).”[7]
The letters are written in Paul's name and have traditionally been accepted as authentic.[8] Since the 1700s, however, scholars have increasingly come to see them as the work of someone writing after Paul's death.[8]
On the basis of their language, content, and other factors, the pastoral epistles are considered by skeptical scholars[9] as having been not written by Paul, but written after his death.[10] (The Second Epistle to Timothy, however, is sometimes thought to be more likely than the other two to have been written by Paul.[11]) Beginning withFriedrich Schleiermacher in a letter published in 1807, biblical textual critics and scholars examining the texts fail to find their vocabulary and literary style similar to Paul's unquestionably authentic letters, fail to fit the life situation of Paul in the epistles into Paul's reconstructed biography, and identify principles of the emerged Christian church rather than those of the apostolic generation.[12]
As an example of qualitative style arguments, in the First Epistle to Timothy the task of preserving the tradition is entrusted to ordainedpresbyters; the clear sense ofpresbýteros (Koine Greek:πρεσβύτερος,lit. 'elder') as an indication of an office is a sense that to these scholars seems alien to Paul and the apostolic generation. Examples of other offices include the twelve apostles inActs and the appointment of sevendeacons, thus establishing the office of thediaconate.Presbýteros is sometimes translated aselder; viaEcclesiastical Latinpresbyter it is also the Greek root for the English wordpriest. (The office of presbyter is also mentioned in James chapter 5.)[12]
A second example would begender roles depicted in the letters. The pastoral letters proscribe certain roles for women in a manner that appears to deviate from Paul's more egalitarian teaching that in Christ there is neither male nor female.[12] Separate male and female roles, however, were not foreign to the authentic Pauline epistles; theFirst Letter to the Corinthians (14:34–35) commands silence from women during church services, stating that "it is a shame for women to speak in the church". FatherJerome Murphy-O'Connor, O.P., in theNew Jerome Biblical Commentary, "agrees with many other commentators on this passage over the last hundred years in recognising it to be an interpolation by a later editor of 1 Corinthians of a passage from 1 Timothy 2:11–15 that states a similar 'women should be silent in churches'". This made 1 Corinthians more widely acceptable to church leaders in later times. If verses before or after 1 Corinthians 14:34–35 are read, it is fairly clear that verses 34 and 35 seem out of place.[13]
Similarly, biblical scholars since Schleiermacher in 1807 have noted that the pastoral epistles seem to argue against a version ofGnosticism that is more developed than would be compatible with Paul's time.[12]
The pastoral epistles are omitted in some early Bible manuscripts, including the fourth centuryCodex Vaticanus (one of the oldest mostly complete Bible manuscripts in existence) and the second or third century Chester BeattyPapyrus 46 (the oldest mostly complete copy of the Pauline epistles).
Luke Timothy Johnson asserts "the impossibility ofdemonstrating the authenticity of the Pastoral Letters". However, he thinks that "the grounds for declaring them inauthentic are so flawed as to seriously diminish the validity of the scholarly 'majority opinion.'"[14]
So some scholars refer to the anonymous author as "the Pastor".[8]
Among theApostolic Fathers, "a strong case can be made forIgnatius' use of ... 1 and 2 Timothy".[15] Similarly forPolycarp.[16] The unidentified author of theMuratorian fragment (c. 170) lists the Pastorals as Pauline, while excluding others e.g.to the Laodiceans.Origen[17] refers to the "fourteen epistles of Paul" without specifically naming Titus or Timothy.[18] However it is believed that Origen wrote a commentary on at least the epistle to Titus.[19]
Biblical scholars such asStanley Porter or Ray Van Neste who ascribe the books to Paul find their placement fits within his life and work and see the linguistic differences as complementary to differences in the recipients.[20] While other Pauline epistles have fledgling congregations as theaudience, the recipients of record in the Pastoral Epistles are Paul's close companions, evangelists whom he has extensively worked with and trained. In this view, linguistic differences are to be expected, if one is to ascribe Pauline authorship to them.
It is highly probable that 1 and 2 Timothy were known and used byPolycarp in hisepistle to the Philippians.[21] Polycarp is known to have died around 155–167, so this would seem to set anupper limit for the dating of the pastoral epistles.Irenaeus explicitly references the epistles to Timothy in his anti-Gnostic treatiseAgainst Heresies, written c. 180.[22] Proposals by scholars for the date of their composition have ranged from the 1st century to well into the second.
The later dates are usually based on the hypothesis that the Pastorals are responding to specific 2nd-century developments, such asMarcionism andGnosticism. Several scholars have argued that the pastoral epistles attack Marcionism in particular.[23][24][25][26] IfMarcion is taken to have started his ministry in earnest only after his excommunication from the Roman church in 144 CE,[27] then this would suggest that the pastoral epistles were written after 144. Furthermore, the fact thatMarcion's canon did not include the pastoral epistles is another piece of evidence for which any model must account.[28]
On the other hand, according toRaymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament, 1997), the majority of scholars who accept a post-Pauline date of composition for the Pastorals favour the period 80–100. Scholars supporting a date in this mid range can draw on the description in 2 Timothy 1:5 of Timothy's Christian mother and grandmother who passed on their faith, as alluding to the original audience being third generation Christians.
{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help){{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
Texts on Wikisource: