Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Party for the Animals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Political party in the Netherlands
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Party for the Animals" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Party for the Animals
Partij voor de Dieren
AbbreviationPvdD
LeaderEsther Ouwehand
ChairmanZwanny Naber
Leader in theSenateIngrid Visseren-Hamakers[a]
Leader in theHouse of RepresentativesEsther Ouwehand
Leader in theEuropean ParliamentAnja Hazekamp
FoundersMarianne Thieme
Ton Dekker
Lieke Keller
Founded28 October 2002 (2002-10-28)
HeadquartersAmsterdam
Youth wingPINK!
Think tankNicolaas G. Pierson foundation
Membership(January 2025)Increase 31,648[1]
IdeologyAnimal rights[2]
Animal welfare[3]
Anti-capitalism[4]
Environmentalism[3]
Political positionLeft-wing[5] tofar-left[6]
European affiliationAnimal Politics EU
European Parliament groupThe Left in the European Parliament
Colours  Dark green
Senate[a]
1 / 75
House of Representatives
3 / 150
Provincial councils
26 / 572
European Parliament
1 / 31
Website
partijvoordedieren.nl
www.partyfortheanimals.nl

TheParty for the Animals (Dutch:Partij voor de Dieren[pɑrˈtɛivoːrˈdiːrə(n)],PvdD) is apolitical party in theNetherlands. Among its main goals areanimal rights andanimal welfare.[3] The PvdD was founded in 2002 as asingle-issue party for animal rights, opposing animal cruelty and the treatment of animals in agriculture. The party then developed into a left-wing, ecological party.[7]

Since 2019, the PvdD's political leader isEsther Ouwehand. With 2.08% of the votes at the2025 general election, the PvdD holds three of the 150House of Representatives's seats. In theSenate, it has three of the 75 seats. PvdD holds 26 States-Provincial seats across all provinces. In theEuropean Parliament, it has one of the 31 seats allocated to theNetherlands constituency.

History

[edit]

Founding

[edit]

TheFirst Balkenende cabinet was more hostile to animal welfare than the precedingSecond Kok cabinet: it scrapped plans to banmink farming, relaxed restrictions on hunting, and postponed regulations onfactory farming.[8]: 70  Cabinet partyPim Fortuyn List (LPF) pushed for these changes; Lieke Keller, director of the anti-fur farming organisationBont voor Dieren [nl] (Bont for animals), interpreted these acts as trying to "get even" with activists following theassassination of Pim Fortuyn by environmental and animal rights activistVolkert van der Graaf.[9] Despite their past support for animal welfare,GroenLinks and theSocialist Party did not vocally oppose the cabinet's animal policy.[8]: 70  The cabinet was described as having rolled back 20 years of animal welfare progress.[10] When a snap election was announced on 21 October 2002, Keller spoke with her colleagueMarianne Thieme and suggested starting a party dedicated to animal rights. Thieme responded that she didn't believe insingle-issue parties, but changed her mind on 24 October during a protest againstseal hunting: "It's about an entire group of inhabitants being ignored, that's not a single issue".[9] Thus, the Party for the Animals was founded and registered on 28 October 2002. The media did not pay attention to this, as it was focused on the LPF's internal struggles.[9]

In the lead-up to the2003 Dutch general election, the party faced the challenge of selecting a suitable lead candidate. While co-founder Lieke Keller was a natural candidate to lead, her existing role as director of Bont voor Dieren, and her extensive political contacts, made her unsuitable for front-line candidacy. To preserve ongoing lobbying efforts, Keller stepped back, and her colleagueMarianne Thieme—a relatively unknown but committed figure—was selected as spokesperson. The party initially sought a celebrity to head the electoral list, but when this proved unfeasible, Thieme was put forward. Some founders saw the effort as a publicity stunt rather than a serious political bid.Niko Koffeman, who had previously overseen campaigns for theSocialist Party, nonetheless took an active role, shaping the party's program and advising on media outreach. As media attention grew, notably following an interview inHet Parool on 6 December 2002, Thieme's public profile grew. The campaign relied on securing free publicity.[11]

The PvdD's campaign focused on a cluster of settlements in South Holland:Leiden,Warmond,Voorschoten,Oegstgeest,Jacobswoude andHillegom.[12] Despite modest resources, the party secured several hundred members and operated on a total budget of €30,000—two-thirds of which came fromhotelier Irene Visser. This was spent primarily on posters and flyers.[13]: 87  However, an administrative error led to a significant setback: The PvdD's candidate list for Overijssel was submitted 40 minutes past the legal deadline, and although the documents had been faxed earlier, the Electoral Council and the Council of State both upheld the disqualification. As a result, the party was barred from competing in the province. Thieme criticized the ruling as excessively rigid and suggested that the presence of established parties within the Council of State might discourage political newcomers.[14]

When votes were counted, the PvdD came just short of winning a parliamentary seat. Initial projections by most major media outlets showed the party below the threshold, though a Radio 1 forecast briefly placed it at one seat. Ultimately, the party received 47,754 votes—just 518 votes below the threshold for parliamentary representation. This narrow margin raised questions about whether participation in Overijssel might have altered the result.[13]: 88  Despite the disappointment, the party issued a statement expressing optimism, noting that such voter support was achieved with minimal resources, media exposure, and preparation. Party officials framed the outcome as evidence of latent public backing for a political movement grounded in animal liberation.[15] While the PvdD missed entering parliament, it nonetheless outperformedLivable Netherlands (LN), which lost both its seats after securing just 38,856 votes.[16]

Although initially considered atestimonial party, a party which does not seek to gain political power but to testify its beliefs and thereby influence other parties, the party signaled its willingness to enter a coalition government in 2021.[17][18] The party today is a part of the governing coalitions in the municipalities ofAlmere,Arnhem andGroningen.[19]

Electoral breakthrough

[edit]

The electoral breakthrough for the PvdD occurred at the2004 European elections. The party won 3.22% of the votes (153.432 votes), not enough to win a seat, but a sharp improvement compared to their 2003 result. In2006 the party won their first seats in the Tweede Kamer, withMarianne Thieme andEsther Ouwehand being elected to parliament. The party gained a lot of attention due to a number of prominentlijstduwers, such asPaul Cliteur,Maarten 't Hart,Kees van Kooten,Rudy Kousbroek,Georgina Verbaan andJan Wolkers.

The Party won nine seats in eightprovinces in the2007 Dutch provincial elections, securing one seat in theEerste Kamer. In 2010, the party won representation on the local councils ofAmsterdam,Rotterdam,Utrecht,Arnhem,Gouda,Vlagtwedde andPijnacker-Nootdorp; this meant that the PvdD secured representation on every level of government in the Netherlands.

In consequent elections, the electoral support for the PvdD remained relatively stable, winning two seats in the Tweede Kamer in2010 and2012. In2014, the party won representation to the European parliament and joined theEuropean United Left-Nordic Green Left parliamentary group.

In2017, the party gained its best result to date, winning five seats in the Tweede Kamer. On 16 July 2019Femke Merel van Kooten split from the PvdDcaucus and continued as anindependent member of parliament. The reason for the split was that Van Kooten criticized the narrow political focus of the party, which in her opinion focused too much onecology andanimal rights.[20]

Ouwehand leadership

[edit]

On 8 October 2019, founder and longtime leaderMarianne Thieme retired from the leadership and the Tweede Kamer.Esther Ouwehand succeeded Thieme as parliamentary leader, andEva van Esch replaced her as a member of parliament. She was previously a city council woman inUtrecht.

Ideology

[edit]

Their main aim is to improve the life of animals and nature as a whole. They see the constant emphasis on economic growth as one of the main reasons for the lack of animal rights and is to blame for the state that nature currently is in.[21] They want animal rights to be enshrined in the constitution. It is firmly on the left side of the political spectrum, considered an either a left-wing[5] or a far-left party.[6]

The party has also have widened its scope to more than just animal rights, for example sustainability, healthcare, housing and more. It also strives for a shorter workweek and for auniversal basic income.[22] The economical demands of the party include a "radical greening" (Dutch:radicale vergroening) of the economy.[23]

The Party for the Animals opposes capitalism and calls for a different economic system; this is combined with the party's support ofdegrowth, writing: "growth does not bring the solution but the problems" and "growth is an untenable concept on a globe that does not grow with it."[4] It was also described as socialist.[24] The party fields anti-capitalist candidates, such as the radical economistEwald Engelen,[25] as well as Wesley Pechler, who calls for "an inclusive, green and anti-capitalistGroningen" on the party's website.[26] Conversely, in its program, the party argues that the neoliberal economic policies are destructive and a "system change" is needed in order to build a more inclusive and equal society.[27]

After joining the party, Engelen promoted thebioregionalist aspect of the party, writing: "the Party for the Animals is the only party that has the nerve to say that Amsterdam should shrink, instead of grow. The Party for the Animals is the only one that courageously resists the massive lobby of the coalition of the municipality, big business,Rai andSchiphol. All the others dance along to that seductive tune of growth, growth, growth." He also remarked: "Instead of fixing these marketing images in stone for eternity, we would do well to preserve what is characteristic of the Netherlands: its beautiful medium-sized provincial cities. Good for the quality of life, good for the air quality, good for animals and good for nature."[28]

Other proposals of the party include:[27]

  • lowering the voting age to 16;
  • introducingdirect democracy through establishment of regular consultative referendums;
  • shortened required notification period for protests and citizens' initiative;
  • strict ethical and privacy scrutiny to automatized or AI-based systems;
  • direction election ofwater boards instead of being chosen indirectly via municipal councils;
  • universal housing program.

Allied organisations

[edit]

PINK!

[edit]

PINK! is theyouth wing of the PvdD.[29] It was established on 12 September 2006, and has slightly over 2,000 members (2021 figure).[30] The name is derived from the Dutch word for a cow that is older than a calf, but not yet fully mature.[31] The current chairperson is Bob Steenmeijer, who succeeded Manuela Rot in 2024.[32]

Nicolaas G. Pierson Foundation

[edit]

The Nicolaas G. Pierson Foundation is the research department of the PvdD. Founded in 2007, it is named after Niek Pierson, a Dutch economist and an earlypolitical donor of the party.

Animal Politics EU

[edit]

Initially founded as Euro Animal 7,Animal Politics EU is an informal grouping of animal rights based political parties within theEuropean Union. Animal Politics EU has member parties in theNetherlands,Belgium,Cyprus,France,Germany,Italy,Portugal,Sweden andSpain. The group currently has oneMEP:Anja Hazekamp of the PvdD.Martin Buschmann for theTierschutzpartei was formerly an MEP in this group but is no longer as of 2020.

Electorate

[edit]

The electorate of the PvdD consists in majority of women (estimated at 70%) living in urban areas.[33] In 2023 the party achieved its best results inAmsterdam (11.5%),Arnhem (8.8%),Bergen (8.3%),Haarlem (9.8%),Nijmegen (9.3%),Schiermonnikoog (9%) andZutphen (8.7%).[34] The party has lowest support in rural areas with large agricultural industries, such as in theBible belt. It is supported by many organic farmers, and positions itself as a farmer's party which wants to free farmers from the big agricultural companies and their lobbyists, and help farmers transition to organic farming.

The PvdD has the largest proportion ofvegan/vegetarian voters of any political party in the Netherlands, with 17.3% or 27.9% of PvdD voters in saying in two surveys in 2021 that they did not eat meat. The party with the second-highest proportion of vegan/vegetarian voters in both surveys wasGroenLinks, for which the share laid at 8.4% or 16.9%.[35][36][37]

In 2021, a survey byKatholiek Nieuwsblad found that Catholic voters make up greater share of the PvdD's electorate than those of denominationally Christian parties such asCDA,ChristenUnie andSGP.[38] According to the Nieuwsblad's survey, Catholic voters tend to avoid denominationally Protestant or interconfessional parties and vote for strictly Catholic or secular ones in greater numbers instead. The newspaper also claimed that the voting behaviour of the PvdD and theSP is remarkably often in line with the moral views of the Catholic Church, and that "the social teachings of the Church are more progressive than is often thought".[38] The former leader of the party,Marianne Thieme, often made appeals to Christian voters.[39]

Electoral results

[edit]
Anja Hazekamp, Leader in the European Parliament since 2014

House of Representatives

[edit]
ElectionLead candidateListVotes%Seats+/–Government
2003Marianne ThiemeList47,7540.49
0 / 150
NewOpposition
2006List179,9881.83
2 / 150
Increase 2Opposition
2010List122,3171.30
2 / 150
Steady 0Opposition
2012List182,1621.93
2 / 150
Steady 0Opposition
2017List335,2143.19
5 / 150
Increase 3Opposition
2021Esther OuwehandList399,7503.84
6 / 150
Increase 1Opposition
2023List235,1482.25
3 / 150
Decrease 3Opposition
2025List219,3712.08
3 / 150
Steady 0TBA

Senate

[edit]
ElectionListVotes%Seats+/–
2007List3,3662.06
1 / 75
New
2011List2,1771.06
1 / 75
Steady
2015List6,0733.16
2 / 75
Increase 1
2019List6,5503.78
3 / 75
Increase 1
2023List8,5604.78
3 / 75
Steady 0

European Parliament

[edit]
ElectionListVotes%Seats+/–EP Group
2004List153,4323.22
0 / 27
New
2009List157,7353.46
0 / 25
Steady 0
0 / 26
Steady 0
2014List200,2544.21
1 / 26
Increase 1GUE/NGL
2019List220,9384.02
1 / 26
Steady
1 / 29
Steady 0
2024List281,6004.52
1 / 31
Steady 0The Left

Provincial

[edit]
ElectionVotes%Seats+/–
2007[40]144,1322.55
9 / 564
2011[41]131,2311.88
7 / 566
Decrease 2
2015[42]210,1133.46
18 / 570
Increase 11
2019[43]317,1034.36
20 / 570
Increase 2
2023[44]359.8044.7
26 / 572
+6 6

Municipalities

[edit]

At the2022 Dutch municipal elections, the PvdD won 63 seats, gaining representation in 29 municipalities. Party-wise, they have the most seats (4) inLeiden,Nijmegen andGroningen.[45]

Representation

[edit]

Members of the House of Representatives

[edit]
Main article:List of members of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands for Party for the Animals

Members of the Senate

[edit]
Main article:List of members of the Senate of the Netherlands for Party for the Animals

Members of the European Parliament

[edit]
Main article:List of members of the European Parliament for the Netherlands, 2024–2029

The MEPs of the Party for the Animals are part of theEuropean United Left–Nordic Green Left Group in the European parliament.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^abThe party isde facto represented in the Senate by the independent Visseren-Hamakers Group. The group using the name "Party for the Animals" (consisting ofPeter Nicolaï andNiko Koffeman) cut its ties with the party in November 2025.

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Ledentallen Nederlandse politieke partijen per 1 januari 2025" [Membership of Dutch political parties as of 1 January 2025].University of Groningen (in Dutch). Documentation Centre Dutch Political Parties. 10 March 2025. Retrieved7 April 2025.
  2. ^Brouwer, Daphne; Coulter, Kendra; Fitzgerald, Amy (2022). "Animal Protection Organizations and Public Policy: The Case of the Netherlands".Politics and Animals.8 (1): 1-11.
  3. ^abcNordsieck, Wolfram (2021)."Netherlands".Parties and Elections in Europe. Retrieved24 March 2021.
  4. ^abten Hooven, Marcel (18 July 2018)."De haas in de wedstrijd".De Groene Amsterdammer (in Dutch) (29–30).Nu moet gezegd: de Partij voor de Dieren is ook moeilijk in het politieke landschap te lokaliseren. Vanwege haar activisme en haar antikapitalisme wordt ze in de publieke opinie doorgaans met links geassocieerd. [Now it must be said: the Party for the Animals is also difficult to locate in the political landscape. Because of its activism and anti-capitalism, it is usually associated with the left in public opinion.]
  5. ^ab
  6. ^ab
  7. ^Nichols, Dick; Wroth, Will (21 March 2017)."Dutch election: GreenLeft and Animal Rights gains the bright spots as Wilders stalls and mainstream right strengthens".links.org.au.
  8. ^abSiebelink, Jeroen; Thieme, Marianne (2022).Vasthouden aan jouw idealen: De opkomst van de Partij voor de Dieren (in Dutch). M.L. Thieme uitgeverij.ISBN 9789090357355.
  9. ^abcBanning, Cees; Alberts, Jaco (10 March 2007)."Je bent voor, of je bent tegen".NRC Handelsblad.
  10. ^"Partijgeschiedenis".Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 2021-07-27. Retrieved2025-05-22.
  11. ^Banning, Cees; Alberts, Jaco (10 March 2007)."Je bent voor, of je bent tegen".NRC Handelsblad.
  12. ^"Partij vor de Dieren strandt halverwege".Leidsch Dagblad. 23 January 2003. p. 1.
  13. ^abSiebelink, Jeroen; Thieme, Marianne (2002).Vasthouden aan jouw idealen: De opkomst van de Partij voor de Dieren (in Dutch). M.L. Thieme uitgeverij.ISBN 9789090357355.
  14. ^Schoof, Rob (4 January 2003)."Wie een foutje maakt, is af".NRC Handelsblad.
  15. ^"47.754 stemmen, PvdD komt 518 stemmen tekort voor terruggave borgsom | Nieuws".Partij voor de Dieren (in Dutch). Retrieved2025-06-27.
  16. ^"Partij voor de Dieren meer stemmen dan Leefbaar Nederland".www.parlement.com (in Dutch). Retrieved2025-06-27.
  17. ^"Ouwehand: PvdD is klaar om mee te regeren".nos.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved2021-02-13.
  18. ^"Vijf jaar Partij voor de Dieren in Nederlands parlement" (in Dutch). 2011-10-02. (note: testimonial party is 'getuigenispartij' in Dutch)
  19. ^"De partij".Partij voor de Dieren (in Dutch). Retrieved2023-03-18.
  20. ^van Ast, Maarten (16 July 2019)."Partij voor de Dieren royeert Van Kooten vanwege 'zetelroof'".Algemeen Dagblad. Retrieved13 February 2021.
  21. ^"De partij".Partij voor de Dieren (in Dutch).
  22. ^"Wat is de Partij voor de Dieren?".NPO Kennis (in Dutch). Retrieved2023-09-05.
  23. ^Bouwmans, Saskia (9 April 2018)."Links Nederland in de nesten?".sap-rood.org (in Dutch).
  24. ^Rocha, Mateus Brazão (2023).The (I)Liberal Reason for the Rise of Populist Nationalism in the European Union (Master of Arts In International Relations thesis). San Francisco, California: San Francisco State University. p. 44.
  25. ^van den Berg, Ewout (30 January 2017)."Wat is de opgave van links met de verkiezingen?".BNNVARA (in Dutch).
  26. ^"Wesley Pechler".partijvoordedieren.nl (in Dutch).
  27. ^abNicolaï, Else; Groenendijk, Amber (24 March 2021)."Participatie in de standpunten van politieke partijen" (in Dutch). pp. 32–33.
  28. ^Engelen, Ewald[in Dutch] (20 March 2018)."Waarom ik lijstduwer voor de Partij voor de Dieren in Amsterdam ben".ftm.nl (in Dutch).
  29. ^"Machtsstrijd over koers in top van Partij voor de Dieren".Algemeen Dagblad. 2019.
  30. ^"Wij zijn".pinkpolitiek.nl. Archived fromthe original on 28 September 2020. Retrieved26 February 2021.
  31. ^"Van de jongerenafdelingen van PvdA, GL, BIJ1 en PvdD mag het wel radicaler - VICE".Vice.com. Retrieved2021-07-23.
  32. ^"Bestuur".Pink Politiek (in Dutch). Retrieved2024-07-25.
  33. ^Rooduijn, Matthijs (2021-01-14)."Plaatjes van de electoraatjes: de Partij voor de Dieren".StukRoodVlees (in Dutch). Retrieved2021-02-13.
  34. ^"NOS - Bekijk alle verkiezingsuitslagen".metatags.io. Retrieved2023-03-18.
  35. ^"De pluimveesector mag er zijn en blijven!"(PDF).depluimveesectormagerzijnenblijven.nl. 2021. p. 10.
  36. ^"NL staat achter de varkenssector!"(PDF).bouwenopframesoffeiten.nl. 2021. p. 10.
  37. ^"Eten PvdD- en GroenLinksstemmers liever kip dan varken? - Vleesonderzoek varkens- en pluimveesector levert verrassend resultaat op".Foodlog. 14 June 2021. Retrieved2022-03-25.
  38. ^abde Wit, Anton (11 March 2021)."Linkse partijen vaak 'katholieker' dan christelijke partijen".kn.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved7 August 2023.
  39. ^Boogerd, David;Paas, Stefan (3 June 2023)."Marianne Thieme wordt theoloog: 'Het christendom moet revolutionair zijn'".nporadio1.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved7 August 2023.
  40. ^"Provinciale Staten 7 maart 2007". Retrieved2018-12-13.
  41. ^"Provinciale Staten 2 maart 2011". Retrieved2018-12-13.
  42. ^"Provinciale Staten 18 maart 2015". Retrieved2018-12-13.
  43. ^"Provinciale Staten 20 maart 2019". Retrieved2019-04-01.
  44. ^"NOS - Bekijk alle verkiezingsuitslagen".metatags.io. Retrieved2023-03-18.
  45. ^"Partij voor de Dieren verdubbeld in gemeenteraad".partijvoordedieren.nl (in Dutch). 17 March 2022. Retrieved17 March 2022.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toPartij voor de Dieren.
National parties
represented in the
States General and/or
European Parliament
without representation in
the States General and/or
European Parliament
Local parties
European Netherlands
Caribbean Netherlands
Regional parties
Water board parties
European UnionNetherlands European Parliament, Netherlands
Delegations
Elections
Current parties
Former parties
Topics (overviews, concepts, issues, cases)
Overviews
Concepts
Issues
Animal
husbandry
Animal testing
Animal welfare
Fishing
Wild animals
Cases
Studies
Methodologies
Observances
Monuments and memorials
Advocates (academics, writers, activists)
Academics
and writers
Contemporary
Historical
Activists
Contemporary
Historical
Movement (groups, parties)
Groups
Contemporary
Historical
Parties
Activism
Media (books, films, periodicals, albums)
Books
Films
Periodicals
Journals
Magazines
Albums
Fairs and exhibitions
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Party_for_the_Animals&oldid=1323740494"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp