| New Testament manuscript | |
.jpg) Luke 6:4-16 | |
| Sign | 𝔓4 |
|---|---|
| Text | Luke 1-6 (extensive parts of,) |
| Date | Late 2nd/3rd century |
| Script | Greek |
| Found | Coptos,Egypt |
| Now at | Paris,Bibliothèque Nationale, Suppl. Gr. 1120 |
| Type | Alexandrian text-type |
| Category | I |
Papyrus 4 (𝔓4, part ofSuppl. Gr. 1120) is an earlyNew Testament papyrus of theGospel of Luke inGreek. Opinions differ as to its age. It has been dated anywhere from the late second century to the fourth century.
_-_Gospel_of_Matthew%2527s_title%2c_euangelion_kata_Maththaion.jpg)
It is one of the earliest manuscripts (along with𝔓75)[1] of theGospel of Luke and contains extensive sections of its first six chapters.[2] It is currently housed in theBibliothèque nationale de France (Suppl. Gr. 1120) in Paris.
It contains texts of Luke: 1:58-59; 1:62-2:1; 2:6-7; 3:8-4:2; 4:29-32, 34-35; 5:3-8; 5:30-6:16
The Greek text-type of this codex is a representative of theAlexandrian.Aland placed it inCategory I.[3] There is agreement with𝔓75 in 93%.[4]
In Luke 6:2 — οὐκ ἔξεστιν (not lawful) for οὐκ ἔξεστιν ποιεῖν (not lawful to do); the reading is supported only byCodex Vaticanus Graecus 1209, (Codex Bezae),Codex Nitriensis,700, lat, copsa, copbo, arm, geo;[5]
Some early accounts stated that𝔓4 was used as stuffing for the binding of a codex of Philo, written in the late third century and found walled up in a house at Coptos.[6] Apparently this account was incorrect, however, as the fragments were actually found stashed between pages of the codex of Philo, not in the binding.[7]
Philip Comfort andDavid Barret in their bookText of the Earliest NT Greek Manuscripts argue that𝔓4 came from the same codex as𝔓64+67, theMagdalen papyrus, and date the texts to 150-175.[8] Willker tentatively agrees stating 'The [3rd century] dating given is that ofNA. Some date it into the 2nd CE (e.g. Roberts and Comfort). This is quite probable considering the use as binding material for a 3rd CE codex'.[2] Comfort and Barret also show that𝔓4 and𝔓64+67 have affinities with a number of late 2nd century papyri.[9] Roberts (1979), Skeat (1997),[10] Willker[2] and Stanton[11] also date the text to the late 2nd century, leading Gregory to conclude that '[t]here is good reason to believe that𝔓4 ... may have been written late in the 2nd century...'.[10]Frederic Kenyon dated𝔓4 to the fourth century. In 2018,Brent Nongbri argued that it was not possible with current knowledge to date𝔓4 to a specific century, and that any dates from the 2nd to 4th centuries were equally reasonable.[12] Charlesworth has concluded 'that𝔓64+67 and𝔓4, though written by the same scribe, are not from the same ... codex.'[13]
