The region is contested by China, America, and Japan, with India recently engaging as well as part of itsAct East policy and overall rise on the world stage.[6][7][8]
The Japan-Philippines baseball game from the1917 Far Eastern Games. Baseball has served as a trans-Pacific pastime from the 19th century onward, having reached the western Pacific along with America's contemporaryexpansion.[10]
Columbus's1492 voyage to the Americas marked the beginning of theEuropean expansion which would lead totrans-Pacific contact between Asia and the West.[11][12] Europeans begancolonizing Southeast Asia from the 16th century onwards (though the vast majority was only colonized starting in the mid-19th century),[13] with China also having some of its territorysplit up between the colonial powers. The Chinese artisans found themselves losing out to Westernmass production, with China becoming an insignificant economic player in Pacific Asia.[14]
The allure of easier access to and spreading civilizing influence over territories throughout the Pacific Rim incentivized America toexpand westward,[15] with its borders and influence reaching Asia by the mid-to-late 19th century in a kind of extended "Manifest Destiny",[16] and America taking overGuam and thePhilippines anddispelling theSpanish Empire from Pacific Asia in 1898.[17] Japan, having been forced toopen up by American naval force in the 1850s,[18]became an industrial power and also played a role inconquering Pacific Asia around the same time, reaching the peak of its power when it drove European powers out of the region duringWorld War 2.[19]
In the aftermath of World War 2 andAllied victory over Japan, America participated heavily throughout Pacific Asia, tolerating the authoritarianism that characterized the regimes in the region due to its need for anti-communist allies to prosecute theCold War in Asia,[20][21] and later for thewar on terror.[22]
Deng Xiaoping's reforms in late-20th-century China led to the country becoming more economically important, re-assuming a central role in Pacific Asia during the2008 financial crisis.[14] In the 21st century, Pacific Asia has become an economically interconnected region, trading more within itself than theEU or America, having significant intermigration throughout the region,[23] and having significant solidarity in its votes and stances at theUN.[24] Tensions have emerged between Pacific Asian countries around theSouth China Sea (such asregarding Taiwan) and regarding theKorean conflict,[25] with Japan having somewhat of a leadership role in the region but also being rejected at times due to other Pacific Asian countries' reaction to colonial-eraJapanese war crimes,[26] with America being asked to maintain influence in the region as a counterweight to Japan.[27]
The desire of Pacific Rim countries to counterbalance China has led to India's increasing involvement in multiple coalitions throughout the region as part of the broaderIndo-Pacific.[28]
^Margolin, Jean-Louis (2016), Lee, Sunkyoung (ed.),"Connecting through colonisation?",Connectivity: Facts and Perspectives, Connecting Asia and Europe, vol. II, Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF), pp. 297–314, retrieved2024-08-06,It should be acknowledged that there were two very contrasting phases during the five centuries of European presence. Until around 1850, for more than three centuries, the European sphere of direct domination in Southeast Asia was geographically and demographically limited. After the mid-19th century, the capacity of European powers and colonists to impose their will was much stronger, even if it only lasted until the momentous coming of the Japanese army in 1941-2.
