Otto Ohlendorf | |
|---|---|
 Mugshot for theNuremberg Military Tribunal (1 March 1948) | |
| Born | (1907-02-04)4 February 1907 |
| Died | 7 June 1951(1951-06-07) (aged 44)[a] |
| Cause of death | Execution by hanging |
| Convictions | Crimes against humanity War crimes Membership in a criminal organization |
| Trial | Einsatzgruppen trial |
| Criminal penalty | Death |
| Details | |
| Victims | 90,000+ |
Span of crimes | June 1941 – July 1942 |
| Country | Ukraine andRussia |
| Targets | Slavs,Jews,Romas, andCommunists |
Date apprehended | 23 May 1945 |
| SS career | |
| Allegiance |  Nazi Germany |
| Branch |  Schutzstaffel |
| Rank | SS-Gruppenführer |
| Commands |
|
Otto Ohlendorf (German pronunciation:[ˈɔtoːˈʔoːləndɔʁf]; 4 February 1907 – 7 June 1951) was a GermanSS functionary andHolocaust perpetrator during theNazi era. An economist by education, he was head of theSicherheitsdienst (SD) Inland, responsible for intelligence and security within Germany. In 1941, Ohlendorf was appointed the commander ofEinsatzgruppe D, which perpetrated mass murder inMoldova,south Ukraine, theCrimea and, during 1942, theNorth Caucasus. He was tried at theEinsatzgruppen Trial, sentenced to death, and executed by hanging in 1951.
Born inHoheneggelsen (today part ofSöhlde; then in theKingdom of Prussia), Otto Ohlendorf came into the world as part of "a farming family".[2] He joined theNazi Party in 1925 and theSS in 1926.[3] Ohlendorf studiedeconomics andlaw at theUniversity of Leipzig and theUniversity of Göttingen, and by 1930 was already giving lectures at several economic institutions. In 1931, Ohlendorf was awarded a two-semester scholarship to theUniversity of Pavia.[4] According to historian Alan Steinweis, Ohlendorf was one of the few Nazis who possessed two doctoral degrees.[5] In 1933 he obtained the position of a research directorship in theKiel Institute for the World Economy.[3] Ohlendorf was active in theNational Socialist Students' League in both Kiel and Göttingen and taught at the Nazi Party's school in Berlin.[6] He participated in major debates between the SS, theGerman Labour Front, and the Quadrennial Organization on economic policy.[7] By 1938 he was also manager in the Trade section of the Reich Business Board (Reichswirtschaftskammer [de]). HistorianChristian Ingrao quips that for Ohlendorf, Nazism was a "quest for race" in the historical continuum, and even though he never stated it that way, his faith in Germandom was akin to that of his fellow SS intellectuals.[8]
Ohlendorf joined theSD in 1936 and became an economic consultant of the organisation. Like other academics such asHelmut Knochen andFranz Six, Ohlendorf had been recruited by SD talent-scouts.[9] Attached to the SS with the rank of SS-Hauptsturmführer, by 1939 he had reached the rank of SS-Standartenführer and was appointed as head of Amt III (SD-Inland) of theReich Security Main Office (RSHA),[10][11] a position he kept until 1945.[6] His role in collecting intelligence from his secret-police agents was disliked by some of the Nazi leadership.Reichsführer-SSHeinrich Himmler once characterized Ohlendorf as "an unbearable Prussian" who was "without humour".[6] Nonetheless, Ohlendorf was instrumental as a member of the SD in shaping Nazi economic doctrine, which became "increasingly virulent as the war progressed" as he attempted to mould the economy "in an ethnic context".[12] It was Ohlendorf's responsibility as head of the SD-Inland to collect data and scientifically to examine social, cultural, and economic issues, assembling reports to his superiors in the Nazi government.[13] Routine public-opinion surveys—which were under the purview of Ohlendorf and of SS-MajorReinhard Höhn—constituted some of these reports.[14] These public-opinion polls on the social climate of Nazi Germany were both unpopular and controversial.[15]
In June 1941,Reinhard Heydrich appointed Ohlendorf as commander ofEinsatzgruppe D,[16] which operated in southernUkraine andCrimea.[17] Joining theEinsatzgruppen was an unappealing prospect and Ohlendorf refused twice before his eventual appointment.[18] Transfers from the RSHA to theEinsatzgruppen were in part due to personnel shortages but also to keep the initial killing-operations confined to those who already knew the details, such as Ohlendorf,Arthur Nebe, andPaul Blobel.[19]Einsatzgruppe D was the smallest of the task forces, but was supplemented by Romanians along their way through the killing fields ofBessarabia, southern Ukraine, and the Caucasus.[20] Additional manpower forEinsatzgruppe D came from Ukrainian auxiliary-police formations.[21] Supporting military operations, Ohlendorf's group was attached to the Eleventh Army.[22][b] Ohlendorf'sEinsatzgruppe in particular was responsible for the 13 December 1941 massacre atSimferopol, where at least 14,300 people, mostly Jews, were killed. Over 90,000 murders throughout Ukraine and the Caucasus are attributed to Ohlendorf's unit.[24][c]
Ohlendorf disliked the use of the oft-employedGenickschuß (shot to the back of the neck) and preferred to line up victims and fire at them from a greater distance; this method allegedly alleviated personal responsibility for the individual murderers.[25] All forms of contact between the firing squads and victims were limited—per Ohlendorf's insistence—until the last moments before the killing started, and up to three rifleman were allocated to each person about to be shot.[26] To ensure the group-killing mentality, Ohlendorf forbade any commando from taking individual actions and explicitly instructed his men not to take any of the victims' valuables.[27] One of Ohlendorf's most trusted "proper" military-style murderers,HaupsturmführerLothar Heimbach [de], once exclaimed, "A man is the lord over life and death when he gets an order to shoot three hundred children—and he kills at least one hundred fifty himself."[28][d]
Many of the killing operations were personally overseen by Ohlendorf, who wanted to ensure they were "military in character and humane under the circumstances".[30] The number of persons killed under the leadership ofEinsatzgruppen commanders such as Ohlendorf are "staggering", despite the use of varying murder techniques.[31] On 1 August 1941,Einsatzgruppen commanders, including Ohlendorf, received instructions fromGestapo chiefHeinrich Müller to keep headquarters (Hitler especially) informed of their progress in the East; Müller also encouraged the speedy delivery of photographs showing the results of these operations.[32] During September 1941, Ohlendorf's group slaughtered 22,467 Jews and communists atNikolayev near the Black Sea port ofOdessa.[33]
Due to theWehrmacht's insistence that Ukraine's agricultural production was needed to sustain its military campaign, Ohlendorf was asked by the army during October 1941 to refrain from killing some of the Jewish farmers[e]—a request he honored—but one which earned him Himmler's contempt.[f] Nonetheless, just a month prior in September 1941, Ohlendorf announced to his men that "from now on the Jewish question is going to be solved and that means liquidation".[35] From that month forward, theEinsatzgruppen had begun the process of systematically shooting not just men but women and children, a transition that historianPeter Longerich terms "the decisive step on the way towards a policy of racial annihilation".[36]
Between February and March 1942, Himmler ordered thatgas vans should be used to murder women and children so as to reduce the strain on the men, but Ohlendorf reported that many of theEinsatzkommandos refused to utilize the vans since burying the victims proved an "ordeal" afterwards.[37][g] Gas-van killing operations were usually conducted at night to keep the population from witnessing the macabre affair.[39] After the victims' deaths, JewishSonderkommandos were forced to unload the bodies, clean the excrement from inside the van's gas chamber, and once the clean-up was complete, were themselves immediately shot.[40] As far as Ohlendorf was concerned, the gas vans were impracticable for the scale of killing demanded by Himmler; namely, since they could only kill between fifteen and twenty-five persons at a time.[41]
HistorianDonald Bloxham characterises Ohlendorf as a bureaucrat who was trying to "prove himself in the field".[42] Another historian,Mark Mazower, describes Ohlendorf as a "gloomy, driven, self-righteous Prussian".[43] His commitment to the Nazi cause kept him in Ukraine longer than any of his comrades, and while he may have disliked the political direction in which Germany was headed, he never registered complaints about murdering Jews.[43] He did, however, express misgivings about the barbarity and sadism being meted out by the Romanian units that accompanied theEinsatzgruppen in their murderous tasks, since they were not only leaving a trail of corpses in their wake, they were also pillaging and raping in the process.[44] He also complained about the Romanians driving thousands of frail elderly persons and children from Bessarabia andBukovina—all incapable of work—into German-held regions, whom Ohlendorf's men forced back into Romanian territory, but not without killing a significant percentage of them as a result.[45]
Ohlendorf devoted only four years (1939–1943) of full-time activity to the RSHA, for in 1943, in addition to his other jobs, he became a deputy director-general (German:Staatssekretär) in theReich Ministry of Economic Affairs (German:Reichswirtschaftsministerium).[46] Sometime in November 1944, he was promoted to SS–Gruppenführer.[3] Believing their expertise invaluable, Ohlendorf,Ludwig Erhard, and other experts concerned themselves with how to stabilize German currency after the prospective end of the war.[47] Hoping to salvage the reputation of the SD, Ohlendorf offered his services in the hopes that he could shape the postwar reconstruction of Germany, but along "National Socialist lines", remaining convinced—as was AdmiralKarl Dönitz (who would make Ohlendorf hisde facto economics minister underAlbert Speer in theFlensburg Government of May 1945)—that some form of Nazism would ultimately survive.[48][h]
In May 1945, Ohlendorf participated in Himmler's flight fromFlensburg. He surrendered to British authorities on 23 May 1945.[50][51] For several weeks after his arrest, he was carefully interrogated, during which he revealed the criminal nature of the German campaign in the East.[52]
Ohlendorf was called as a witness by the prosecution during the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg on 3 January 1946. During the subsequentEinsatzgruppen trial, Ohlendorf was the chief defendant, and was also a key witness in the prosecution of other indicted war criminals. Ohlendorf's apparently reliable testimony was attributed to his distaste for thecorruption in Nazi Germany and a stubborn commitment to duty. The court examined Ohlendorf concerningEinsatzgruppen operations in particular.[53] At his trial, Ohlendorf insisted that he, as a loyal Nazi, had acted properly and done nothing wrong.[54] He expressed no remorse for his actions, telling prosecutorBen Ferencz, who was Jewish, afterwards that theJews of the United States would suffer for what Ferencz had done. He seemed more concerned about the moral strain on those carrying out the murders than those being murdered.[55]
Ohlendorf attempted to presentEinsatzgruppen operations in the Soviet area "not as a racist programme for the annihilation of all the Jews ... but as a general liquidation order primarily aimed at 'securing' the newly won territory."[56] Defending his actions, Ohlendorf comparedEinsatzgruppen activities to the Biblical Jewish extirpation of its enemies; he likewise claimed that his firing squads were "no worse than the 'press-button killers' who dropped the atom bomb on Japan."[57]
Ohlendorf's defense also claimed that Hitler had ordered the murder of all Jews before theGerman invasion of the Soviet Union. This order was revealed to be a fabrication many years later by prosecuting attorney and Germany'scentral office chief to investigate National Socialist crimes at Ludwigsburg,Alfred Streim [de].[58][i] Ohlendorf justified the systematic murder asanticipatory self-defense against themortal threat supposedly posed by Jews, Romas, Communists, and others. He argued that the killing of Jewish children was necessary since they would have grown up to hate Germany.[55] The term he used, "permanent security", was later borrowed by historianA. Dirk Moses in his criticism of the concept of genocide as a category mistake. Moses argues that permanent security is an unobtainable goal that if pursued, inevitably leads to anticipatory attacks that harm civilians, and therefore it "underlies all atrocity crimes and common state practices like aerial bombing and sanctions."[62]
Despite his attempts to establish moral equivalency for atrocities upon the Allies, Otto Ohlendorf was convicted ofcrimes against humanity andwar crimes committed during World War II. He was sentenced to death in April 1948 and spent three years in detention before being hanged at theLandsberg Prison inBavaria on 7 June 1951.[3][57]
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| People | |
| Other | |
