Sir Osbert LancasterCBE (4 August 1908 – 27 July 1986) was an Englishcartoonist, architectural historian, stage designer and author. He was known for his cartoons in the British press, and for his lifelong work to inform the general public about good buildings and architectural heritage.
The only child of a prosperous family, Lancaster was educated atCharterhouse School andLincoln College, Oxford; at both he was an undistinguished scholar. From an early age he was determined to be a professional artist and designer, and studied at leading art colleges in Oxford and London. While working as a contributor toThe Architectural Review in the mid-1930s, Lancaster published the first of a series of books on architecture, aiming to simultaneously amuse the general reader and demystify the subject. Several of the terms he coined as labels for architectural styles have gained common usage, including "Pont Street Dutch" and "Stockbroker's Tudor", and his books have continued to be regarded as important works of reference on the subject.
In 1938 Lancaster was invited to contribute topical cartoons toThe Daily Express. He introduced the single column-width cartoon popular in the French press but not until then seen in British papers. Between 1939 and his retirement in 1981 he drew about 10,000 of these "pocket cartoons", which made him a nationally known figure. He developed a cast of regular characters, led by his best-known creation,Maudie Littlehampton, through whom he expressed his views on the fashions, fads and political events of the day.
From his youth, Lancaster wanted to design for the theatre, and in 1951 he was commissioned to create costumes and scenery for a new ballet,Pineapple Poll. Between then and the early 1970s he designed new productions for theRoyal Ballet,Glyndebourne,D'Oyly Carte,the Old Vic and theWest End. His productivity declined in his later years, when his health began to fail. He died at his London home inChelsea, aged 77. His diverse career, honoured by aknighthood in 1975, was celebrated by an exhibition at theWallace Collection marking the centenary of his birth and titledCartoons and Coronets: The Genius of Osbert Lancaster.
Lancaster was born at 79 Elgin Crescent in London in 1908, the only child of Robert Lancaster (1880–1917) and his wife, Clare Bracebridge,née Manger.[1] His paternal grandfather,Sir William Lancaster, rose from modest beginnings to become the chief executive of thePrudential Assurance Company,Lord of the manor ofEast Winch, Norfolk, and a philanthropist in the field of education.[2] Osbert's mother was an artist, known for her paintings of flowers, who had exhibited regularly at theRoyal Academy;[3] his father was a publisher,[4] who volunteered for the army on the outbreak of theFirst World War, was commissioned as asecond lieutenant in theNorfolk Regiment, and was killed at theBattle of Arras in April 1917.[5]
.jpg)
Elgin Crescent,Notting Hill, where Lancaster was born and raised, was anupper-middle class area. The family maintained a staff of servants, including a cook and anurse.[4][6] Such was the mixed nature of London in the early years of the 20th century that a short distance away were the deprived and dangerousNotting Dale and thePortobello Road, where, as Lancaster recalled in his 1953 memoirs, it was said to be impossible for a well-dressed man to walk and emerge intact.[7] From an early age Lancaster was aware of the variety of classes, nationalities, and social attitudes around him.[8]
In 1918 Lancaster was sent toSt Ronan's preparatory school,Worthing. The régime at the school leaned heavily towards sport, in which he was neither interested nor proficient. The headmaster,Stanley Harris, was a celebrated amateur footballer and occasional first class cricketer, but he was reasonably tolerant of Lancaster's disdain for games, and on the whole Lancaster enjoyed his time at the school. His education there was, he later commented, of more importance to him than anything he learned later in his school and university career.[9] He left St Ronan's in 1921, aged thirteen, and went toCharterhouse, where his father and uncles had all been sent.[10] There he was shocked by the bullying and bad language,[11] but in addition to its sporty, philistine "bloods",[12][n 1] the school had an intellectual and aesthetic tradition.[14] Lancaster's biographerRichard Boston writes, "The heartyBaden-Powell, for example, was offset byRalph Vaughan Williams andRobert Graves, while talented Carthusian artists had includedThackeray,Leech,Lovat Fraser andMax Beerbohm".[14] The art master, P. J. ("Purple") Johnson, encouraged Lancaster, insisting that a sound technique was a prerequisite for effective self-expression in drawing or painting; in that respect the boy's time at the school was valuable, though otherwise the headmaster found him "irretrievably gauche ... a sad disappointment".[15] Lancaster shared Beerbohm's view that being an old boy of the school was more pleasurable than being a pupil there.[16][n 2]
At the age of seventeen Lancaster passed his final school examinations and gained entrance toLincoln College, Oxford, to study history. He persuaded his mother to allow him to leave Charterhouse at once, giving him several months between school and university, during which he enrolled on a course oflife classes at theByam Shaw School of Art in London.[17] In October 1926 he started at Oxford. There, as at Charterhouse, he found two camps in which some students chose to group themselves: the "hearties" presented themselves as aggressively heterosexual and anti-intellectual; the "aesthetes" had a largely homosexual membership.[18] Lancaster followed his elder contemporaryKenneth Clark in being contentedly heterosexual but nonetheless one of the aesthetes, and he was accepted as a leading member of their set.[19] He cultivated the image of anEdwardian dandy, with large moustache, a monocle and check suits, modelling his persona to a considerable degree on Beerbohm, whom he admired greatly.[20] He also absorbed some characteristics of the Oxford donMaurice Bowra; Lancaster's friendJames Lees-Milne commented, "Bowra's influence over Osbert was marked, to the extent that he adopted the guru's booming voice, explosive emphasis of certain words and phrases, and habit in conversation of regaling his audiences with rehearsed witticisms and gossip."[3] Lancaster's undergraduate set includedStephen Spender,Randolph Churchill, and most importantlyJohn Betjeman, who became a close friend and lifelong influence.[3][21]
Lancaster tried rowing with theOxford University Boat Club, but quickly discovered he was no more suited to that than he had been to field games at school.[22] He joined theOxford University Dramatic Society (OUDS), acted in supporting roles, designed programme covers, wrote, and choreographed.[23] He contributed prose and drawings toIsis andCherwell magazines, engaged in student pranks,[n 3] staged an exhibition of his pictures,[n 4] attended life classes, and became established as a major figure in the Oxonian social scene.[26] All these diversions led him to neglect his academic work. He had made things more difficult for himself by switching from the history course to English after his first year, a decision he regretted once confronted with the rigours of compulsoryAnglo-Saxon, which he found incomprehensible.[27][n 5] Making a belated effort, he extended his studies from the usual three years to four, and graduated with a fourth-class degree in 1930.[29]
.jpg)
Lancaster's family believed that art was a suitable hobby but an unacceptable profession;[n 6] they agreed that the best career for him would be the law.[30] He dutifully attended acrammer and joined theMiddle Temple, but repeatedly failed his law examinations. His studies were abruptly bought to an end by his health. A chest ailment was diagnosed as possiblytubercular, and he was sent to a sanatorium in Switzerland. After three months he was declared fit, and following a holiday inVenice – a lifelong love and aesthetic influence – he returned to England in 1931. He abandoned all thoughts of becoming a lawyer and enrolled full-time at theSlade School of Art in London.[31]
At the Slade, Lancaster enjoyed most of his classes, but particularly those in stage design run byVladimir Polunin, who had beenDiaghilev's chief scene-painter and had worked withPicasso.[32] Among Polunin's students was Karen Harris, daughter of the banker Sir Austin Harris. Lancaster fell in love with her;[33] his feelings were reciprocated, but she was only seventeen and her parents thought her too young to marry. At first they were cautious about Lancaster's suitability as a husband and provider, but they came to approve of him.[33] He and Karen were married in June 1933.[34] They had two children: Cara (born 1934) andWilliam (born 1938); the former became astage manager, the latter, ananthropologist.[35]
.jpg)
Lancaster earned a living as a freelance artist, producing advertising posters, Christmas cards, book illustrations and a series of murals for a hotel. In 1934 he secured a regular post withThe Architectural Review, which was owned by a family friend and of which Betjeman was assistant editor.[36] The magazine had a reputation as "the mouthpiece of themodernist movement", employing leading proponents such asErnő Goldfinger andNikolaus Pevsner.[37] Despite describing theBauhaus style as "balls",[37] Lancaster was not anti-modernist, but he joined Betjeman andRobert Byron in advancing the countervailing value of more traditional architecture.[38] Chief among his many activities forThe Architectural Review was reviewing books, particularly those on art. His biographer James Knox comments that Lancaster's taste was already assured, appreciating the diverse gifts of contemporary artists includingEdward Burra,Giorgio de Chirico,Edward Wadsworth andPaul Nash.[39]
Knox singles out as Lancaster's most lasting contribution to the magazine a series of illustrated satires on planning and architecture, under the titleProgress at Pelvis Bay. The collected articles were turned into a book, under the same title, published in 1936. It lampooned greedy and philistine property development in a typical seaside resort. Reviewing the book inThe Observer, Simon Harcourt-Smith wrote, "Mr Lancaster spares us no horrifying detail of the borough's development ... [his] admirable drawings complete the picture of progress and desolation. I hope that every local authority and real-estate developer will be compelled to read this ghoulish little book."[40] Lancaster followed this withPillar to Post (1938), a lighthearted book with roughly equal amounts of text and drawings, aiming to demystify architecture for the intelligent lay person.[41] The architectural scholarChristopher Hussey remarked on the author's inventive coinage of terms for period styles such as "Banker's Georgian", "Stockbroker's Tudor" and "By-pass Variegated", and described the book as both perceptive and shrewd.[42]
In 1938 Lancaster agreed to help Betjeman write a series of articles forThe Daily Express. He became friendly with the paper's features editor, John Rayner, who responded positively to Lancaster's praise of "the little column-width cartoons" popular in the French press but not, so far, seen in British papers.[43] Rayner dubbed them "pocket cartoons" after thepocket battleships then much in the news, and invited Lancaster to contribute some.[3] The first appeared on 3 January 1939.[n 7] The early cartoons accompanied the "William Hickey" gossip column; later they were promoted to a front-page slot, where they remained a regular feature, with only brief interruptions, for more than forty years, totalling about 10,000.[45] The popularity of Lancaster's cartoons led to attempts by other papers, includingThe Times, to lure him away from theExpress, but he resisted them.[46] Although he thought theExpress's proprietor,Lord Beaverbrook, "an old brute" and "a bastard", he found him "an ideal employer as far as I was concerned: he left one's work absolutely alone".[47][48][n 8]
Shortly after the outbreak of war, Lancaster joined theMinistry of Information.[50] He spoke good French and German, and because of that and his journalistic experience, he was recruited by the section handling British propaganda overseas.[51] Several other prominent figures were members of the section and there were many clashes of egos and few tangible achievements.[52][n 9] In July 1941, Lancaster was transferred to theForeign Office's news department.[n 10] His duties included giving daily news briefings to other public servants and the British press, monitoring German propaganda broadcasts, and drawing caricatures for leaflets in German, Dutch and French for aerial drops in enemy-held territory.[55]
The pocket cartoons made Osbert a national figure. They caught the mood of the nation, defiantly facing adversity with good humour. In a time of peril they gave people something to laugh about. Though they were small in size, their contribution to national morale was enormous.
In addition to his official duties Lancaster was art critic forThe Observer between 1942 and 1944, and continued to contribute the pocket cartoons to theExpress; from 1943 he also drew a large weekly cartoon for its sister newspaper,The Sunday Express, under the pen-name "Bunbury".[3][n 11] Despite the wartime shortage of paper, the publisherJohn Murray produced a collection of the pocket cartoons every year from 1940 to 1944.[1]
In December 1944, the war approaching its end, Lancaster was posted to Greece as press attaché to the British embassy in Athens. After the occupying Germans had withdrawn, opposing factions brought the country to the brink of civil war. Fearing a communist takeover, the British government supportedGeorgios Papandreou, prime minister of the formergovernment-in-exile, now precariously in power in Athens, backed by British troops.[58] When Papandreou's police fired on acivilian demonstration in full view of the world's press, British support for him came under international pressure.[59] The British embassy, at which Lancaster arrived on 12 December, was the target for gunfire from various anti-government groups, and he joined the ambassador (Reginald Leeper), the British Minister Resident in the Mediterranean (Harold Macmillan) and a staff virtually under siege.[60]
Following an initiative by Macmillan and the personal intervention ofWinston Churchill, a new government took office in Athens acceptable to all sides, and peace was briefly restored, in January 1945.[61] Lancaster's task was then to restore trust and good relations between Britain – its government, embassy and military – and the international press corps. In this he was generally thought to have succeeded.[62] After that, he took the opportunity of travelling in the country beyond Athens during the months before civil strife returned in 1946. He exploredAttica,Boeotia andArcadia, and also visitedThessaly,Epirus and some of theislands.[63] He fell in love with Greece,[64] which he revisited repeatedly throughout the rest of his life.[65] During his excursions in 1945 and 1946 he sketched continually, and the results were published with his accompanying text asClassical Landscape with Figures in 1947. Boston describes it as "an unflinching but lyrical account of the conditions of post-war Greece";The Times called it "a fine work of scholarship" as well as "an outstanding picture book".[66]
During the three years between his return from Greece and the end of the decade, Lancaster published two more books, one a comic story originally written for his children,The Saracen's Head, and the other a further satirical book about architecture and planning,Drayneflete Revealed.[67] In 1947–48 he was the Sydney Jones Lecturer in Art atLiverpool University, following earlier appointees includingSir Herbert Read,W. G. Constable,Frank Lambert andH. S. Goodhart-Rendel.[68]
The 1951Festival of Britain gave Lancaster new opportunities to expand his artistic scope. Despite the hostility to the festival shown by his main employer, Beaverbrook, Lancaster was a major contributor.[69] He and his friendJohn Piper were commissioned to design the centrepiece of the Festival Gardens on the south bank of theThames. Boston describes it as "a 250-yard succession of pavilions, arcades, towers, pagodas, terraces, gardens, lakes and fountains, in styles that included Brighton Regency, Gothic and Chinese".[70] The main site of the festival, around the newRoyal Festival Hall, was intended to convey the spirit of modernist architecture; the gardens were designed to evoke the atmosphere ofGeorgianpleasure gardens, such asVauxhall andRanelagh.[71]
It was to be a place of "elegant fun" with a dance hall, amusement park, shopping parade, restaurants, pubs and a wine garden. Osbert was ideally equipped to follow this brief.
The gardens attracted about eight million visitors during the 1951 festival.[72]The Manchester Guardian called them "a masterpiece ... fantasy on fantasy, red and gold and blue and green, a labyrinth of light-hearted absurdity".[73]
Lancaster's association with Piper led to a second departure in his professional career: stage design. In connexion with the Festival of Britain,Sadler's Wells Ballet mounted a new work,Pineapple Poll byJohn Cranko, and approached Piper to design it. He could not take the commission and recommended his colleague. This was an opportunity Lancaster had keenly awaited since he was eleven, when his mother took him to see Diaghilev's production ofThe Sleeping Beauty. He recalled "the dazzling beauty of theBakst sets and the intensity of my own response ... There and then I formed an ambition that was not destined to be fulfilled for more than thirty years".[74] Cranko's exuberant ballet was an immediate success – "the hit of the season", in Knox's phrase – and turned Lancaster into one of the country's most sought-after theatre designers.[75] During the rest of the 1950s and the 1960s his costumes and scenery were seen in new productions atCovent Garden,Glyndebourne,the Old Vic,Aldeburgh and inthe West End.[1]
Although he had provided drawings for a few books by other authors in the 1930s it was not until after the war that Lancaster was continually in demand as an illustrator.[76] He illustrated or designed covers for a wide range of books, both fiction and non-fiction. His commissions included drawings for works by friends such asNancy Mitford,Alan Moorehead andAnthony Powell; for best-sellers includingC. Northcote Parkinson andP. G. Wodehouse;[76] and for other modern authors includingRuth McKenney,Violet Powell,Simon Raven andVirginia Graham. He also illustrated new editions of classic works by authors from Shakespeare to Beerbohm andSaki.[77]
.jpg)
InOsbert: A Portrait of Osbert Lancaster, Boston comments that after the dramatic events in Athens his subject's later life was uneventful and industrious with "a somewhat dismaying dearth of rows, intrigues, scandals or scrapes to report."[78] The Lancasters had a Georgian house inHenley-on-Thames, and a flat inChelsea, where they lived from Mondays to Fridays.[79] He worked at home in the mornings, on illustrations, stage designs, book reviews and any other commissions, before joining his wife for a middaydry martini and finally dressing and going to one of hisclubs for lunch.[n 12] After that he would walk to theExpress building inFleet Street at about four in the afternoon. There he would gossip with his colleagues before sitting at his desk smoking furiously, producing the next day's pocket cartoon. By about half-past six he would have presented the cartoon to the editor and be ready for a drink atEl Vino's across the road, and then the evening's social events.[82]
Karen Lancaster died in 1964. They were markedly different in character, she quiet and home-loving, he extrovert and gregarious, but they were devoted to each other, and her death left him devastated.[83] Three years later he married the journalistAnne Scott-James; they had known each other for many years, although at first she did not much like him, finding him "stagey" and "supercilious".[84] By the 1960s they had become good friends, and after Karen died the widowed Lancaster and the divorced Scott-James spent increasing amounts of time together. Their wedding was at theChelsea Register Office on 2 January 1967.[85] After their marriage they kept his Chelsea flat, and lived at weekends in her house in theBerkshire village ofAldworth, the house in Henley having been sold.[84]
_(2).jpg)
Though generally a commentator rather than a campaigner, Lancaster made an exception for the protection of Britain's architectural heritage, where he became a leader of public opinion.[86] The historianJerry White has written that the demolition of theEuston Arch in London in 1962 alerted the general public that "without vigilance and sturdy resistance, London was in danger of losing its landmarks one by one, in the interests of either profit or a misconceived public weal".[87] Lancaster had been pressing this point since before the war.[86] In 1967 he was appointed to theGreater London Council's Historic Buildings advisory committee, joining Betjeman, Pevsner andSir John Summerson.[87][88] They played a major role in defeating theLabour government's plans to demolish the front of theTate Gallery.[87] In 1973, with Betjeman and others of like mind Lancaster campaigned against theConservative government's imposition of entry charges to hitherto free galleries and museums; the charges caused admissions to drop drastically, and were soon abolished.[89]
In June 1975 Lancaster wasknighted in theQueen's Birthday Honours.[90] He and his wife collaborated onThe Pleasure Garden (1977), a history of the British garden. Although great gardens such asStowe were given full coverage, her text and his drawings did not neglect more modest efforts: "The suburban garden is the most important garden of the 20th century and there is no excuse other than ignorance for using the word 'suburban' in a derogatory sense".[91] The following year Lancaster was made aRoyal Designer for Industry (RDI) by theRoyal Society of Arts, a distinction in which his predecessors had included the artist and architectHugh Casson; the typographerEric Gill;Charles Holden, London Transport's architect;Barnes Wallis, the wartime engineer; and a modernist architect with whom Lancaster had vigorously crossed swords,Sir Basil Spence. There would not be another theatre designer RDI untilStefanos Lazaridis in 2003.[92] In 1978 Lancaster suffered the first of a series ofstrokes, and his health began a slow decline. He designed no more for the theatre, drew his last pocket cartoon for theExpress in May 1981,[93] and published his last collection,The Life and Times of Maudie Littlehampton the following year.[1]
Lancaster died at his Chelsea flat on 27 July 1986, aged 77. He was buried with previous generations of his family in the churchyard at West Winch.[94] A memorial service was held atSt Paul's, Covent Garden in October 1986.[95]
In 2008 the architectural historianGavin Stamp described Lancaster'sPillar to Post (1938) – later revised and combined with the sequelHomes Sweet Homes (1939) – as "one of the most influential books on architecture ever published – and certainly the funniest".[96] Lancaster felt that architects and architectural writers had created a mystique that left the lay person confused, and in the two books he set out to demystify the subject, with, he said, "a small mass of information leavened by a large dose of personal prejudice."[97][n 13]
From an early age Lancaster had been fascinated by architecture. He recalled his first trip to Venice and the "staggering" view ofSan Giorgio Maggiore from thePiazzetta, and as a young man he went on what he described as "church crawls" with Betjeman.[98] His concern for architectural heritage led him to write and draw what Knox describes as "a series of architectural polemics in the guise of disarming 'picture books'".Harold Nicolson said of Lancaster's work in this sphere, "Under that silken, sardonic smile there lies the zeal of an ardent reformer ... a most witty and entertaining book. But it is more than that. It is a lucid summary of a most important subject".[99] Four of Lancaster's books are in this category:Progress at Pelvis Bay lampoons insensitive planners and avaricious developers;Pillar to Post illustrates and analyses the exteriors of buildings from ancient times to the present;Homes Sweet Homes does the same for the interiors.Drayneflete Revealed is in the same vein asProgress at Pelvis Bay. In all these Lancaster employs something of the technique he prescribed for stage design: presenting a slightly heightened version of reality. The twisted columns in the "Baroque" section are not drawn directly from actual baroque buildings, but are the artist's distillation of the many examples he has seen and sketched. By such means, he set out to make the general public aware of good buildings, and "the present lamentable state of English architecture".[98]
Lancaster's sketches and paintings in and around Greece are rarely satirical; they are a record of his love for, and careful scrutiny of the country. When his contempt for tyranny prevented him from visiting Greece while it was under military rule he went instead to Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon and Syria, always with a large sketchbook, in which he wrote and drew. From these sketches he producedClassical Landscape with Figures (1947),Sailing to Byzantium: An Architectural Companion (1969) and, in a different vein,Scene Changes (1978), in which he ventured into writing poetry to accompany his drawings.[100][n 14]Dilys Powell, a well-knownHellenophile, wrote that Lancaster was "one of the few who could make a joke about the Greeks without giving offence; he was devoted to Greece; he was born to celebrate her".[101]
Although the Beaverbrook papers were editorially right-wing, Lancaster was never pressured into following a party line.[48] His inclination was to satirise the government of the day, regardless of party, and he felt that his overtly partisan colleagues such asDavid Low andVicky were constrained by their political allegiances.[102] He wrote, "It is not the cartoonist's business to wave flags and cheer as the procession passes; his allotted role is that of the little boy who points out that the Emperor is stark naked".[103]
In the late 1940s Lancaster developed a repertory company of characters in whose mouths he put his social and political jokes. The star character wasMaudie, Countess of Littlehampton, who managed to be shrewd and flighty simultaneously. She began as what her creator called "a slightly dotty class symbol", but developed into "a voice of straightforward comment which might be my own".[104] Maudie's political views were eclectic: "on some matters she is far to the right of MrEnoch Powell, and on others well to the left of MrMichael Foot".[105] Her comments on the fads and peculiarities of the day caught the public imagination;[104] the art historianBevis Hillier calls her "an iconic figure to rank with Low'sColonel Blimp andGiles's Grandma".[106] Various candidates have been proposed as the model for Maudie,[n 15] but Lancaster maintained that she was not based on any one real person.[110]
Other regular characters included Maudie's dim but occasionally perceptive husband Willy; two formidable dowagers: the Littlehamptons' Great-Aunt Edna, and Mrs Frogmarch, a middle-class Tory activist;[n 16] Canon Fontwater, a personification of theChurch Militant; Mrs Rajagojollibarmi, an Asian politician; and Father O'Bubblegum, Fontwater's Roman Catholic opposite number; they are seen in the illustration to the right, from the 1975 collectionLiquid Assets. Lancaster's younger contemporaryMark Boxer remarked on the way some characters such as the Canon had developed "square characteristics to fit into the shape of the cartoon box".[47] In his wartime cartoons Lancaster often caricaturedMussolini andHitler; later he rarely portrayed current politicians, although Knox includes a few pocket cartoons from the 1960s in whichGeneral de Gaulle,Harold Wilson and others appear.[112]Richard Nixon featured in a few pocket cartoons during theWatergate scandal; in one he is drawn standing by a flushing lavatory, saying innocently, "Tapes? What tapes?"[113]
The novelistAnthony Powell commented that Lancaster, having carefully invented and stylised his own persona – "bristling moustache, check suits, shirt and tie in bold tints" – created similarly stylised characters for his cartoons, achieving "the traditional dramatic effectiveness of a greatly extended cast for acommedia dell'arte performance".[114]
Lancaster's career designing for the theatre began and ended withGilbert and Sullivan. His first costumes and scenery were for theSadler's Wells Ballet'sPineapple Poll (1951),John Cranko's ballet with a story based on aGilbert poem and music bySullivan.[115] His last were for theD'Oyly Carte Opera Company's revival ofThe Sorcerer (1973).[1] In between, he designed more productions for theRoyal Ballet, as well as forGlyndebourne Festival Opera,the Old Vic and theWest End. It was a matter of mild regret to him that of the twenty plays, operas and ballets that he designed between the two, only one was for a thoroughly serious piece,Britten'sPeter Grimes, for theBulgarian National Opera inSofia in 1964.[66]
Three of Lancaster's theatre designs have remained in use in 21st-century productions, all by the Royal Ballet:Pineapple Poll,La fille mal gardée andCoppélia.[116] In an article on the second in 2016, Danielle Buckley wrote, "Lancaster's surrealist and stylized designs forFille amplify the story's pantomime quality, and the exaggerated burlesque of its comedy – but the backdrops of fields that roll into the distance, bundles of hay, dreamy skies and village cottages provide the idealized, pastoral context that the story needs".[117] Buckley adds that Lancaster's designs have been criticised for locating the ballet in no particular time or place – "except, that is, of a 1960s London view of idyllic country life".[117]
Lancaster's stated view was that stage sets and costumes should reflect reality, but "through a lens, magnifying and slightly over-emphasising everything which it reflects".[118]Sir Geraint Evans commented on how Lancaster's designs helped the performer: "[His] design forFalstaff was superb: it gave me clues to understanding the character, and reflected that marvellous, subtle sense of humour which was present in all his work."[101]
Lancaster's old-fashioned persona, together with his choice of a countess as his principal cartoon mouthpiece, led some to assume his politics were on the right of the spectrum. But despite what he described as his strong traditionalist feelings he was a floating voter: "I've voted Tory and Labour in my time and I think once, in a moment of total mental aberration, voted Liberal."[47][n 17] He distrusted the Conservatives for what he saw as their persistent bias in favour of property developers and against conservation.[120] He rarely let his own views show obviously in his cartoons, but his hatred of political oppression was reflected in his portrayal offascist,communist andapartheid regimes, and he refused to go to his beloved Greece while the militaryjunta was in power from 1967 to 1974.[121] In religion he described himself as "aC of E man ... with that embarrassment induced in all right-thinking men by any mention of God outside church."[47]
Apart from an exhibition as an undergraduate, Lancaster had four large-scale shows of his works. The first was inNorwich in 1955–56, when Betjeman opened an exhibition covering the range of Lancaster's output, including posters from the 1930s as well as cartoons, stage designs, watercolours and architectural drawings.[122] In 1967 a London show concentrated on his costumes and scenery, with examples of work from plays, ballets, opera and, exceptionally, film (Those Magnificent Men in their Flying Machines, 1965).[123] In 1973, at the instigation ofRoy Strong, theNational Portrait Gallery mounted "The Littlehampton Bequest", for which Lancaster painted portraits of Willy Littlehampton's supposed ancestors and offspring, in the style of artists down the centuries, fromHolbein toVan Dyck andLely, and then toReynolds andGainsborough and on toSargent andHockney. Strong wrote an introduction to the book Lancaster published of the collected portraits.[124] To mark the centenary of Lancaster's birth,The Wallace Collection staged an exhibition titledCartoons and Coronets: The Genius of Osbert Lancaster from October 2008 to January 2009. It was curated by James Knox, the editor and author of a lavishly illustrated biography and catalogue with the same title as the exhibition.[106][125]
Lancaster's honours included hisknighthood, hisCBE in the1953 Coronation Honours and anhonoraryD.Litt fromOxford, as well as honorary degrees fromBirmingham (1964),Newcastle upon Tyne (1970), andSt Andrews (1974).[1]
In 2008, the year of Lancaster's centenary,Peter York called him "A national treasure ... arguably Britain's most popular newspaper cartoonist, certainly our most effective, popular architectural historian and illustrator and one of the most inspired 20th-century theatre, opera and ballet designers." But York added that in recent years Lancaster had been largely forgotten: "People under 40 don't know him", as they still knew Betjeman from his many television programmes.[126] TheOxford Companion to English Literature called Lancaster "a writer, artist, cartoonist, and theatre designer, whose many illustrated works gently mock the English way of life: he was particularly good at country‐house and upper‐class architecture and mannerisms, but also had a sharp eye for suburbia."[127] The obituary inThe Times described him as "the most polite and unsplenetic of cartoonists, he was never a crusader, remaining always a witty, civilized critic with a profound understanding of the vagaries of human nature."[66] Sir Roy Strong wrote that Lancaster's cartoons were those "of a gentleman of the old school ... He never crossed into the brilliant savagery ofGerald Scarfe orSpitting Image. The one-liners in his pocket cartoons wereCowardesque".[128]
Although he was much praised at the time – Anthony Powell said, "Osbert kept people going by his own high spirits and wit"[103][n 18] – Lancaster was conscious that the work of a political cartoonist is ephemeral, and he did not expect longevity for his topical drawings.[128] His legacy as a pocket cartoonist has been the genre itself;[43] his successors in the national press have includedMel Calman,Michael Heath,Marc,Matt andTrog.[43][47][126] Despite the topical nature of Lancaster's cartoons, they remain of interest to the historian; Lucie-Smith quotes a contemporary tribute byMoran Caplat: "No social history of this [20th] century will be complete without him. He has joined the handful of artists who, over the last three hundred years, have each in their time mirrored our nation."[101]
The Times said of Lancaster's stage designs, "When the history of Glyndebourne comes to be written, high in the roll of honour will stand the name of Osbert Lancaster, who has the great gift of designing décor that invigorates every opera".[130] But although theatre designs are less ephemeral than topical cartoons, in general they have a practical lifetime measured in years or at most a few decades.[131][132] The survival of Lancaster's costumes and scenery forPineapple Poll andLa fille mal gardée into the 21st century is exceptional, and most of even his highest-praised productions for repertory works have been succeeded by new designs by artists from Hockney toUltz.[131][133]
Lancaster's prose style divided opinion. Betjeman teased him that it was "deliciously convoluted"; Boston and Knox both echo this view.[64] But Beaverbrook's right-hand man, George Malcolm Thompson, said of Lancaster, "The annoying thing at theExpress was that he was not only the only one who could draw; he could alsowrite better than anyone in the building."[134]
Lancaster's most enduring works have been his architectural books.Pillar to Post and its successors have been reissued in various editions, and at 2018 are in print as a boxed set entitledCartoons, Columns and Curlicues, containingPillar to Post,Homes Sweet Homes andDrayneflete Revealed.[135] Reviewing the new edition inThe Irish Times, Niall McGarrigle wrote, "The books are of their time, of course, but their legacy is part of the strong heritage culture that we rightly fight for today".[136]Alan Powers wrote inThe Financial Times, "At least old buildings are now cherished rather better, and the house fronts around Lancaster's birthplace in Notting Hill are jollied up in his favourite pinks and mauves ... now we understand that the compact streets and houses of the past provide the best opportunity for social encounters and save energy, and that even bad buildings can make us smile. For both of these revelations, we owe Osbert Lancaster a lot."[137]
