Anordinary (fromLatinordinarius) is an officer of a church or civic authority who by reason of office hasordinary power to execute laws.
Such officers are found in hierarchically organised churches ofWestern Christianity which have anecclesiastical legal system.[1] For example, diocesan bishops are ordinaries in theCatholic Church[1] and theChurch of England.[2] InEastern Christianity, a corresponding officer is called ahierarch[3] (fromGreekἱεράρχηςhierarkhēs "president of sacred rites, high-priest"[4] which comes in turn from τὰ ἱεράta hiera, "the sacred rites" and ἄρχωarkhō, "I rule").[5]
Incanon law, the power to govern the church is divided into the power to make laws (legislative), enforce the laws (executive), and to judge based on the law (judicial).[6] An official exercises power to govern either because he holds an office to which the law grants governing power or because someone with governing power has delegated it to him. Ordinary power is the former, while the latter is delegated power.[7] The office with ordinary power could possess the governing power itself (proper ordinary power) or instead it could have the ordinary power of agency, the inherent power to exercise someone else's power (vicarious ordinary power).[8]
The law vesting ordinary power could either be ecclesiastical law, i.e. the positive enactments that the church has established for itself, or divine law, i.e. the laws which were given to the Church by God.[9] As an example of divinely instituted ordinaries, whenJesus established the Church, he also established theepiscopate and theprimacy of Peter, endowing the offices with power to govern the Church.[10] Thus, in the Catholic Church, the office of successor of Simon Peter and the office of diocesan bishop possess their ordinary power even in the absence of positive enactments from the Church.
Many officers possess ordinary power but, due to their lack of ordinary executive power, are not called ordinaries. The best example of this phenomenon is the office ofjudicial vicar, a.k.a.officialis. The judicial vicar only has authority through his office to exercise the diocesan bishop's power to judge cases.[11] Though the vicar has vicarious ordinary judicial power, he is not an ordinary because he lacks ordinary executive power. Avicar general, however, has authority through his office to exercise the diocesan bishop's executive power.[12] He is therefore an ordinary because of this vicarious ordinary executive power.
Local ordinaries exercise ordinary power and are ordinaries inparticular churches.[13] The followingclerics are local ordinaries:
Also classified as local ordinaries, although they do not head a particular church or equivalent community are:
Major superiors ofreligious institutes (includingabbots) and ofsocieties of apostolic life are ordinaries of their respective memberships, but not local ordinaries.[20]
In theEastern Orthodox Church, a hierarch (ruling bishop) holds uncontested authority within the boundaries of his own diocese; no other bishop may perform anysacerdotal functions without the ruling bishop's express invitation. The violation of this rule is calledeispēdēsis (Greek: εἰσπήδησις, "trespassing", literally "jumping in"), and is uncanonical. Ultimately, all bishops in the Church are equal, regardless of any title they may enjoy (Patriarch,Metropolitan,Archbishop, etc.). The role of the bishop in the Orthodox Church is both hierarchical and sacramental.[21]
This pattern of governance dates back to the earliest centuries of Christianity, as witnessed by the writings ofIgnatius of Antioch (c. 100 AD):
The bishop in each Church presides in the place of God.... Let no one do any of the things which concern the Church without the bishop.... Wherever the bishop appears, there let the people be, just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is theCatholic Church.
And it is the bishop's primary and distinctive task to celebrate theEucharist, "the medicine of immortality."[21][22]SaintCyprian of Carthage (258 AD) wrote:
The episcopate is a single whole, in which each bishop enjoys full possession. So is the Church a single whole, though it spreads far and wide into a multitude of churches and its fertility increases.[23]
Bishop Kallistos (Ware) wrote:
There are many churches, but only One Church; manyepiscopi but only one episcopate."[24]
InEastern Orthodox Christianity, the church is not seen as a monolithic, centralized institution, but rather as existing in its fullness in each local body. The church is defined Eucharistically:
in each particular community gathered around its bishop; and at every local celebration of the Eucharist it is thewhole Christ who is present, not just a part of Him. Therefore, each local community, as it celebrates the Eucharist ... is the church in its fullness."[21]
An Eastern Orthodox bishop's authority comes from his election andconsecration. He is, however, subject to theSacred Canons of the Eastern Orthodox Church, and answers to theSynod of Bishops to which he belongs. In case an Orthodox bishop is overruled by his local synod, he retains the right ofappeal (Greek: Ἔκκλητον,Ékklēton) to his ecclesiastical superior (e.g. a Patriarch) and his synod.
{{citation}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help){{citation}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)