Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Operation Crossroads

Featured article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1946 nuclear weapon tests at Bikini Atoll

Operation Crossroads
Operation Crossroads test detonations of Able (top) and Baker (bottom).
Map
Information
CountryUnited States
Test siteNE Lagoon, Bikini Atoll
Period1946
Number of testsTwo tested and one cancelled.
Test typeFree fall air drop, Underwater
Max. yield22–23kilotonnes of TNT (92–96 TJ)
Test series chronology

Operation Crossroads was a pair ofnuclear weapon testsconducted by the United States atBikini Atoll in mid-1946. They were the firstnuclear weapon tests sinceTrinity on July 16, 1945, and the firstdetonations of nuclear devices since theatomic bombing of Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. The purpose of the tests was to investigate the effect of nuclear weapons on warships.

The Crossroads tests were the first ofmany nuclear tests held in theMarshall Islands and the first to be publicly announced beforehand and observed by an invited audience, including a largepress corps. They were conducted by Joint Army/Navy Task Force One, headed byVice AdmiralWilliam H. P. Blandy rather than by theManhattan Project, which had developed nuclear weapons duringWorld War II. A fleet of 95target ships was assembled in Bikini Lagoon and hit with two detonations ofFat Manplutoniumimplosion-type nuclear weapons of the kind dropped on Nagasaki in 1945, each with a yield of 23kilotons of TNT (96 TJ).

The first test wasAble. The bomb was namedGilda afterRita Hayworth's character in the 1946 filmGilda and was dropped from theB-29 SuperfortressDave's Dream of the509th Bombardment Group on July 1, 1946. It detonated 520 feet (158 m) above the target fleet and caused less than the expected amount of ship damage because it missed itsaim point by 2,130 feet (649 m).

The second test wasBaker. The bomb was known asHelen of Bikini and was detonated 90 feet (27 m) underwater on July 25, 1946. Radioactive sea spray caused extensive contamination. A third deep-water test namedCharlie was planned for 1947 but was canceled primarily because of theUnited States Navy's inability to decontaminate the target ships after theBaker test. Ultimately, only nine target ships were able to be scrapped rather thanscuttled.Charlie was rescheduled asOperation Wigwam, a deep-water shot conducted in 1955 off the coast of Mexico (Baja California).

Bikini's native residents were evacuated from the island on board theLST-861, with most moving to theRongerik Atoll. In the 1950s, a series of large thermonuclear tests rendered Bikini unfit forsubsistence farming andfishing because ofradioactive contamination. Bikini remains uninhabited as of 2017[update], though it is occasionally visited bysport divers.

Planners attempted to protect participants in the Operation Crossroads tests againstradiation sickness, but one study showed that the life expectancy of participants was reduced by an average of three months. TheBaker test's radioactive contamination of all the target ships was the first case of immediate, concentratedradioactive fallout from a nuclear explosion. ChemistGlenn T. Seaborg, the longest-serving chairman of theAtomic Energy Commission, calledBaker "the world's first nuclear disaster."[1]

Background

[edit]

The first proposal to test nuclear weapons against naval warships was made on August 16, 1945, byLewis Strauss, future chairman of theAtomic Energy Commission. In an internal memo to Secretary of the NavyJames Forrestal, Strauss argued, "If such a test is not made, there will be loose talk to the effect that the fleet is obsolete in the face of this new weapon and this will militate against appropriations to preserve a postwar Navy of the size now planned."[2] With very few bombs available, he suggested a large number of targets widely dispersed over a large area. A quarter century earlier, in 1921, the Navy had suffered a public relations disaster whenGeneralBilly Mitchell's bombers sank every target ship the Navy provided for theProject B ship-versus-bomb tests.[3] The Strauss test would be designed to demonstrate shipsurvivability.[4]

Aerial photo of target ships anchored in a row at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.
Prospective Operation Crossroads target ships and support ships atPearl Harbor on February 27, 1946. Ships from front to rear:USS Crittenden,Catron,Bracken,Burleson,Gilliam,Fallon, unknown ship,Fillmore,Kochab,Luna, and an unidentified tanker andLiberty ship. On the right areLSM-203 andLSM-465. Farther in the background are afloating drydock and a merchant ship hulk.

In August 1945, SenatorBrien McMahon, who within a year would write theAtomic Energy Act and organize and chair the CongressionalJoint Committee on Atomic Energy, made the first public proposal for such a test, but one designed to demonstrate the vulnerability rather than survivability of ships. He proposed dropping an atomic bomb on captured Japanese ships and suggested, "The resulting explosion should prove to us just how effective the atomic bomb is when used against the giant naval ships."[5] On September 19, the Chief of theUnited States Army Air Forces (USAAF),General of the ArmyHenry H. Arnold, asked the Navy to set aside 10 of the 38 captured Japanese ships for use in the test proposed by McMahon.[6]

Meanwhile, the Navy proceeded with its own plan, which was revealed at a press conference on October 27 by the Commander in Chief,United States Fleet,Fleet AdmiralErnest King. It involved between 80 and 100 target ships, most of them surplus U.S. ships.[6] As the Army and the Navy maneuvered for control of the tests,Assistant Secretary of WarHoward C. Peterson observed, "To the public, the test looms as one in which the future of the Navy is at stake ... if the Navy withstands [the tests] better than the public imagines it will, in the public mind the Navy will have 'won.'"[7]

The Army's candidate to direct the tests,Major GeneralLeslie Groves, head of theManhattan Project which built the bombs, did not get the job. TheJoint Chiefs of Staff decided that because the Navy was contributing the most men andmateriel, the test should be headed by a naval officer.CommodoreWilliam S. "Deak" Parsons was a naval officer who had worked on the Manhattan Project and participated in thebombing of Hiroshima.[8] He had been promoted to assistant to theDeputy Chief of Naval Operations for Special Weapons,Vice AdmiralWilliam H. P. Blandy,[9] whom Parsons proposed for the role. This recommendation was accepted, and on January 11, 1946, PresidentHarry S. Truman appointed Blandy as head of Army/Navy Joint Task Force One (JTF-1), which was created to conduct the tests. Parsons became Deputy Task Force Commander for Technical Direction. USAAF Major GeneralWilliam E. Kepner was Deputy Task Force Commander for Aviation. Blandy codenamed the tests Operation Crossroads.[10][11]

Under pressure from the Army, Blandy agreed to crowd more ships into the immediate target area than the Navy wanted, but he refused USAAF Major GeneralCurtis LeMay's demand that "every ship must have a full loading of oil, ammunition, and fuel."[12] Blandy's argument was that fires and internal explosions might sink ships that would otherwise remain afloat and be available for damage evaluation. When Blandy proposed an all-Navy board to evaluate the results, Senator McMahon complained to Truman that the Navy should not be "solely responsible for conducting operations which might well indeed determine its very existence."[13] Truman acknowledged that "reports were getting around that these tests were not going to be entirely on the level." He imposed a civilian review panel on Operation Crossroads to "convince the public it was objective."[14]

Opposition

[edit]

Pressure to cancel Operation Crossroads altogether came from scientists and diplomats. Manhattan Project scientists argued that further testing was unnecessary and environmentally dangerous. ALos Alamos study warned "the water near a recent surface explosion will be a witch's brew" of radioactivity.[15] When the scientists pointed out that the tests might demonstrate ship survivability while ignoring the effect of radiation on sailors,[16] Blandy responded by adding test animals to some of the ships, thereby generating protests fromanimal rights advocates.[17]J. Robert Oppenheimer declined an invitation to attend the test and wrote to President Truman about his objections to it, arguing that any data obtained from the test could be obtained more accurately and cheaply in a laboratory.[18]

Secretary of StateJames F. Byrnes, who a year earlier had told physicistLeo Szilard that a public demonstration of the bomb might make theSoviet Union "more manageable" in Europe,[19] now argued the opposite: that further display of U.S. nuclear power could harden the Soviet Union's position against acceptance of theAcheson–Lilienthal Plan, which discussed possible methods for the international control of nuclear weapons and the avoidance of future nuclear warfare. At a March 22 cabinet meeting he said, "from the standpoint of international relations it would be very helpful if the test could be postponed or never held at all."[20] He prevailed on Truman to postpone the first test for six weeks, from May 15 to July 1. For public consumption, the postponement was explained as an opportunity for more Congressional observers to attend during their summer recess.[21]

When Congressmen complained about the destruction of $450 million worth of target ships, Blandy replied that their true cost was their scrap value at $10 per ton, only $3.7 million.[22] Veterans and legislators from New York and Pennsylvania requested to keep their namesake battleships asmuseum ships, as Texas had done withUSS Texas, but the JTF-1 replied that "it is regretted that such ships as theUSS New York cannot be spared."[23]

Preparation

[edit]
Map of Bikini Atoll, with target area highlighted.
Map of Bikini Atoll and the target area for the tests.

A series of three tests was recommended to study the effects of nuclear weapons on ships, equipment, and materiel. The test site had to be in territory controlled by the United States. The inhabitants would have to be evacuated, so it was best if it was uninhabited, or nearly so, and at least 300 miles (500 km) from the nearest city. So that aB-29 Superfortress could drop a bomb, there had to be an airbase within 1,000 miles (1,600 km). To contain the target ships, it needed to have a protected anchorage at least 6 miles (10 km) wide. Ideally, it would have predictable weather patterns and be free of severe cold and violent storms. Predictable winds would avoid having radioactive material blown back on the task force personnel, and predictable ocean currents would allow material to be kept away from shipping lanes, fishing areas, and inhabited shores.[24] Timing was critical because Navy manpower required to move the ships was being released from active duty as part of the post-World War II demobilization, and civilian scientists knowledgeable about atomic weapons were leaving federal employment for college teaching positions.[25]

On January 24, Blandy named the Bikini Lagoon as the site for the two 1946 detonations,Able andBaker. The deep underwater test,Charlie, scheduled for early 1947, would take place in the ocean west of Bikini.[26] Of the possible places given serious consideration, including Ecuador'sGalápagos Islands,[27] Bikini offered the most remote location with a large protected anchorage, suitable but not ideal weather,[28] and a small, easily moved population. It had come under exclusive United States control on January 15, when Truman declared the United States to be the sole trustee of all the Pacific islands captured from Japan during the war. The Navy had been studying test sites since October 1945 and was ready to announce its choice of Bikini soon after Truman's declaration.[29] On February 6, the survey shipSumner began blasting channels through the Bikinireef into thelagoon. The local residents were not told why.[30]

The 167 Bikini islanders first learned their fate four days later, on Sunday, February 10, when Navy Commodore Ben H. Wyatt, United States militarygovernor of theMarshall Islands, arrived by seaplane fromKwajalein. Referring to Biblical stories which they had learned from Protestant missionaries, he compared them to "the children of Israel whom the Lord saved from their enemy and led into the Promised Land." He also claimed it was "for the good of mankind and to end all world wars." There was no signed agreement, but he reported by cable "their localchieftain, referred to as King Juda, arose and said that the natives of Bikini were very proud to be part of this wonderful undertaking."[31] On March 6, Wyatt attempted to stage a filmedreenactment of the February 10 meeting in which the Bikinians had given away their atoll. Despite repeated promptings and at least seven retakes, Juda confined his on-camera remarks to, "We are willing to go. Everything is in God's hands." The next day, LST-861 moved them and their belongings 128 miles (206 km) east to the uninhabitedRongerik Atoll, to begin a permanent exile.[32] Three Bikini families returned in 1974 but were evacuated again in 1978 because of radioactivity in their bodies from four years of eatingcontaminated food.[33] As of 2022, the atoll remains unpopulated.[34]

Ships

[edit]
View of the target fleet for testAble.

To make room for the target ships, 100 short tons (90 t) ofdynamite were used to removecoral heads from Bikini Lagoon. On the grounds of theDavid Taylor Model Basin outside Washington, DC, dress rehearsals forBaker were conducted with dynamite and model ships in a pond named "Little Bikini."[35] A fleet of 93 target vessels was assembled in Bikini Lagoon. At the center of the target cluster, the density was 20 ships per square mile (7.7 per km2), three to five times greater thanmilitary doctrine would allow. The stated goal was not to duplicate a realistic anchorage but to measure damage as a function of distance from the blast center, at as many distances as possible.[36] The arrangement also reflected the outcome of the Army/Navy disagreement about how many ships should be allowed to sink.[37]

The target fleet included four obsolete U.S. battleships, twoaircraft carriers, twocruisers, thirteendestroyers, eightsubmarines, forty landing ships, eighteen transports, two oilers, one floating drydock, and three surrendered Axis ships, the Japanese cruiserSakawa, the battleshipNagato, and the German cruiserPrinz Eugen.[25] The ships carried sample amounts of fuel and ammunition, plus scientific instruments to measureair pressure, ship movement, andradiation. The live animals on some of the target ships[38] were supplied by the support shipUSS Burleson, which brought 200 pigs, 60 guinea pigs, 204 goats, 5,000 rats, 200 mice, and grains containing insects to be studied for genetic effects by theNational Cancer Institute.[25]Amphibious target ships were beached on Bikini Island.[39]

A support fleet of more than 150 ships provided quarters, experimental stations, and workshops for most of the 42,000 men (more than 37,000 of whom were Navy personnel) and the 37 female nurses.[40] Additional personnel were located on nearby atolls such asEniwetok and Kwajalein. Navy personnel were allowed to extend their service obligation for one year if they wanted to participate in the tests and see an atomic bomb explode.[41] The islands of the Bikini Atoll were used as instrumentation sites and, untilBaker contaminated them, as recreation sites.[42]

Cameras

[edit]
Crossroads-Able, 23 kilotons.

Radio-controlledautopilots were installed in eightB-17 bombers, converting them intoremote-controlled drones which were then loaded with automatic cameras, radiation detectors, and air sample collectors. Their pilots operated them from mother planes at a safe distance from the detonations. The drones could fly into radiation environments, such asAble'smushroom cloud, which would have been lethal to crew members.[43] All the land-based detonation-sequence photographs were taken by remote control from tall towers erected on several islands of the atoll. In all, Bikini cameras took 50,000 still pictures and 1,500,000 feet (460,000 m) ofmotion picture film. One of the cameras could shoot 1,000 frames per second.[44]

Before the first test, all personnel were evacuated from the target fleet and Bikini Atoll. They boarded ships of the support fleet, which took safe positions at least 10 nautical miles (19 km) east of the atoll. Test personnel were issued special dark glasses to protect their eyes, but a decision was made shortly beforeAble that the glasses might not be adequate. Personnel were instructed to turn away from the blast, shut their eyes, and cradle their arm across their face for additional protection. A few observers who disregarded the recommended precautions advised the others when the bomb detonated. Most shipboard observers reported feeling a slightconcussion and hearing a disappointing little "poom".[41]

TheAble bomb, a Mark III 'Fat Man'-type nuclear bomb with its nickname 'Gilda' stenciled onto it, along with a photo ofRita Hayworth in the title role fromthe movie.

On July 26, 2016, theNational Security Archive declassified and released the entire stock of footage shot by surveillance aircraft that flew over the nuclear test site just minutes after the bomb detonated.[45][46] The footage can be seen onYouTube.[47]

Nicknames

[edit]

Able andBaker are the first two letters of theJoint Army/Navy Phonetic Alphabet, used from 1941 until 1956.Alfa andBravo are their counterparts in the currentNATO phonetic alphabet.Charlie is the third letter in both systems. According to eyewitness accounts, the time of detonation for each test was announced as H orHow hour;[48] in the official JTF-1 history, the term M orMike hour is used instead.[49]

There were only seven nuclear bombs in existence in July 1946.[50] The two bombs used in the test wereFat Man plutoniumimplosion-type nuclear weapons of the kind dropped on Nagasaki. TheAble bomb was stenciled with the nameGilda and decorated with anEsquire magazine photograph ofRita Hayworth, star of the 1946 movie,Gilda.[51] TheBaker bomb wasHelen of Bikini. Thisfemme-fatale theme for nuclear weapons, combining seduction and destruction, is epitomized by the use in all languages, starting in 1946, of "bikini" as the name for a woman's two-piecebathing suit.[52]

United States' Crossroads series tests and detonations
NameDate, time (UTC)LocationElevation + heightDeliveryPurposeDeviceYieldRefer-
ences
AbleJune 30, 1946 21:00:01.0NE Lagoon, Bikini Atoll11°35′N165°30′E / 11.59°N 165.50°E /11.59; 165.50 (Able)0 + 158 m (518 ft)Free fall
air drop
Weapon effectMk III "Gilda"23 kt[53][54][55][56][57]
BakerJuly 24, 1946 21:34:59.8NE Lagoon, Bikini Atoll11°35′N165°31′E / 11.59°N 165.52°E /11.59; 165.52 (Baker)0 – 27.5 m (90 ft)Under-
water
Weapon effectMk III "Helen of Bikini"23 kt[53][54][57]
Charlie
(canceled)
March 1, 1947NE Lagoon, Bikini Atoll11°34′N165°31′E / 11.57°N 165.51°E /11.57; 165.51 (Charlie)0 – 50 m (160 ft)Under-
water
Weapon effectMk III23 kt[57]

The United States' test series summary table is here:United States' nuclear testing series.

TestAble

[edit]
The airburst nuclear explosion of July 1, 1946. Photo taken from a tower on Bikini Island, 3.5 miles (5.6 km) away.
Gilda, the 23-kiloton air-deployed nuclear weapon detonated on July 1, 1946, during CrossroadsAble

Detonation

[edit]
Nevada painted in high visibility orange for the atomic tests
The target fleet after testAble. The aircraft carrierSaratoga is right-center withIndependence burning at left-center. The battleshipNagato is between them. The ship at left, next to the battleshipPennsylvania, is trying to wash down the radioactivity with water from the lagoon.

At 09:00 on July 1, 1946,Gilda was dropped from the B-29Dave's Dream of the509th Bombardment Group, piloted by MajorWoodrow Swancutt under the command of Brigadier GeneralRoger M. Ramey.[58] The plane, formerly known asBig Stink, had been the photographic equipment aircraft on the Nagasaki mission in 1945. It had been renamed in honor ofDave Semple, abombardier who was killed during a practice mission on March 7, 1946.[59]Gilda detonated 520 feet (158 m) above the target fleet, with a yield of 23 kilotons. Five ships were sunk.[25][36] Two attack transports sank immediately, two destroyers within hours, andSakawa the following day.[60]

Some of the 114 press observers expressed disappointment at the effect on ships.[61]The New York Times reported, prematurely, that "only two were sunk, one capsized, and eighteen damaged."[62] The next day, theTimes carried an explanation by Forrestal that "heavily built and heavily armored ships are difficult to sink unless they sustain underwater damage."[63]

The main cause of less-than-expected ship damage was that the bomb missed itsaim point by 710 yards (649 m).[64] The ship the bomb was aimed at failed to sink. The miss resulted in a government investigation of the flight crew of the B-29 bomber. Various explanations were offered, including the bomb's known poor ballistic characteristics, but none was convincing. Images of the drop were inconclusive. Thebombsight was checked and found error free.Pumpkin bomb drops were conducted and were accurate. ColonelPaul W. Tibbets believed that the miss was caused by a miscalculation by the crew. The mystery was never solved.[65][66]

There were other factors that madeAble less spectacular than expected. Observers were much farther away than at theTrinity test, and the high humidity absorbed much of the light and heat.[67]

The battleshipUSS Nevada, the only battleship to get underway at theAttack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, had been designated as the aim point forAble and was painted orange, with white gun barrels andgunwales, to make her stand out in the central cluster of target ships. There were eight ships within 400 yards (366 m) of it. Had the bomb exploded over theNevadaas planned, at least nine ships, including two battleships and an aircraft carrier, likely would have sunk. The actual detonation point, west-northwest of the target, was closer to the attack transportUSS Gilliam, in much less crowded water.[68]

Able Target array

[edit]
Map showing ship locations for the nuclear explosion of July 1, 1946. The locations of the 19 ships listed in the accompanying tables are marked with symbols and numbers.
The array of target ships in Bikini lagoon for theAble shot of Operation Crossroads. Half of the target ships were outside the area of this map. The five red X's mark the five ships that sank. The tables (right) contain the key to ship numbers. The circle, with a radius of 1,000 yards (914 m) from the point of detonation, outlines the area of serious ship damage. The intended bullseye for the bomb was ship #32, the battleshipUSS Nevada, which was painted orange to aid the bombardier. The bomb landed closer to ship #5, the attack transportUSS Gilliam. All submarines were on the surface.
Location at which ships sank[69]
#NameTypeDistance from zero
5GilliamTransport50 yd (46 m)
9SakawaCruiser420 yd (380 m)
4CarlisleTransport430 yd (390 m)
1AndersonDestroyer600 yd (550 m)
6LamsonDestroyer760 yd (690 m)
Serious damage
#NameTypeDistance from zero
40SkateSubmarine400 yd (370 m)
12YO-160Yard oiler520 yd (480 m)
28IndependenceAircraft carrier560 yd (510 m)
22CrittendenTransport595 yd (544 m)
32NevadaBattleship615 yd (562 m)
3ArkansasBattleship620 yd (570 m)
35PensacolaCruiser710 yd (650 m)
11ARDC-13Drydock825 yd (754 m)
23DawsonTransport855 yd (782 m)
38Salt Lake CityCruiser895 yd (818 m)
27HughesDestroyer920 yd (840 m)
37RhindDestroyer1,012 yd (925 m)
49LST-52LST1,530 yd (1,400 m)
10SaratogaAircraft carrier2,265 yd (2,071 m)

In addition to the five ships that sank, fourteen were judged to have serious damage or worse, mostly as a result of theshock wave. All but three were located within 1,000 yards (900 m) of the detonation. Inside that radius, orientation to the bomb was a factor in shock wave impact. For example, ship #6, the destroyerUSS Lamson, which sank, was farther away than seven ships that stayed afloat.Lamson wasbroadside to the blast, taking the full impact on her port side, while the seven closer ships were anchored with theirsterns toward the blast, somewhat protecting the most vulnerable part of the hull.[70]

The only large ship inside the 1000-yard radius which sustained moderate rather than serious damage was the sturdily built Japanese battleshipNagato, ship #7, whose stern-on orientation to the bomb gave her some protection. Unrepaired damage from World War II may have complicated damage analysis. As the ship from which the Pearl Harbor attack had been commanded,Nagato was positioned near the aim point to guarantee her being sunk. TheAble bomb missed its target, and the symbolic sinking came three weeks later, five days after theBaker shot.[71]

Fire caused serious damage to ship #10, the aircraft carrierSaratoga, more than 1 mile (1.6 km) from the blast. For test purposes, all the ships carried sample amounts of fuel and ordnance, plus airplanes. Most warships carried aseaplane on deck which could be lowered into the water by crane,[72] butSaratoga carried several airplanes with highly volatileaviation fuel, both on deck and in thehangars below. The fire was extinguished, andSaratoga was kept afloat for use in theBaker shot.[73][74]

Radiation

[edit]
Aerial view of the mushroom cloud.
Aerial view of theAble mushroom cloud rising from the lagoon with Bikini Island visible in the background. The cloud carried the radioactive contaminants into the stratosphere.

As withLittle Boy (Hiroshima) and Fat Man (Nagasaki), the CrossroadsAble shot was anair burst. These were purposely detonated high enough in the air to prevent surface materials from being drawn into the fireball. The height-of-burst for the Trinity test was 100 feet (30 m); the device was mounted on a tower. It made a crater 6 feet (1.8 m) deep and 500 feet (150 m) wide, and there was somelocal fallout. The test was conducted in secret, and the world at large learned nothing about the radioactive fallout at the time.[75] To be a true air burst with no local fallout, the Trinity height-of-burst needed to be 580 feet (180 m).[76] With an air burst, the radioactivefission products rise into thestratosphere and become part of the global, rather than the local, environment. Air bursts were officially described as "self-cleansing."[77] There was no significant local fallout fromAble.[78]

There was an intense transitory burst of fireball radiation lasting a few seconds. Many of the closer ships received doses ofneutron andgamma radiation that could have been lethal to anyone on the ship, but the ships did not become radioactive.Neutron activation of materials in the ships was judged to be a minor problem by the standards of the time. One sailor on the support shipUSS Haven was found to be "sleeping in a shower of gamma rays" from an illegal metalsouvenir he had taken from a target ship. Fireballneutrons had made it radioactive.[79] Within a day nearly all the surviving target ships had been reboarded. The ship inspections, instrument recoveries, and moving and remooring of ships for theBaker test proceeded on schedule.[80]

Test animals

[edit]

57 guinea pigs, 109 mice, 146 pigs, 176 goats, and 3,030 white rats had been placed on 22 target ships in stations normally occupied by people.[81] 35% of these animals died or were euthanised in the three months following the explosion: 10% were killed by the air blast, 15% were killed by radiation, and 10% were killed by the researchers as part of later study.[82] The most famous survivor was Pig #311, which was reportedly found swimming in the lagoon after the blast and was brought back to theNational Zoo in Washington, DC.[83] The mysterious survival of Pig #311 caused some consternation at the time and has continued to be reported in error. However, an investigation pointed to the conclusion that it had neither swum in the ocean nor escaped the blast; it had likely been safely aboard an observation vessel during the test, thus "absent without leave" from its post onSakawa and showing up about the same time other surviving pigs were captured.[84]

Two goats penned on ship deck, within reach of water and food.
Test animals were deliberately confined to the ships of Operation Crossroads. Goat #53, penned like this onNevada's deck, died of radiation exposure two days afterAble.[85]

The high rate of test animal survival was due in part to the nature of single-pulse radiation. As with the two Los Alamos criticality accidents involving the earlierdemon core, victims who were close enough to receive a lethal dose died, while those farther away recovered and survived. Also, all the mice were placed outside the expected lethal zone in order to study possiblemutations in future generations.[86]

AlthoughGilda missed its targetNevada by nearly half a mile (800 meters), and it failed to sink or to contaminate the battleship, a crew would not have survived. Goat #119, tethered inside agun turret and shielded byarmor plate, received enough fireball radiation to die four days later ofradiation sickness having survived two days longer than goat #53, which was on the deck, unshielded.[87] HadNevadabeen fully manned, she would likely have become a floating coffin, dead in the water for lack of a live crew. Two years later she was finished off by anaerial torpedo 105 kilometres (65 mi) southwest of Pearl Harbor on 31 July 1948. In theory, every unprotected location on the ship received 100sieverts (10,000 rem) of initial nuclear radiation from the fireball.[76] Therefore, people deep enough inside the ship to experience a 90% radiation reduction would still have received a lethal dose of 10 sieverts (1,000 rem).[88] In the assessment of theBulletin of the Atomic Scientists:[16]

"a large ship, about a mile away from the explosion, would escape sinking, but the crew would be killed by the deadly burst of radiations from the bomb, and only a ghost ship would remain, floating unattended in the vast waters of the ocean."

Photographic montage of the first few micro-seconds of theAble detonation, fireball and radiation effects.

TestBaker

[edit]
Crossroads-Baker detonation in slow-motion.LSM-60, which was anchored directly above the device, is completely destroyed.

Detonation

[edit]

InBaker on July 25, the weapon was suspended beneathlanding craftLSM-60 anchored in the midst of the target fleet.Baker was detonated at 08:35,[25] 90 feet (27 m) underwater, halfway to the bottom in water 180 feet (55 m) deep. No identifiable part ofLSM-60 was ever found; it was presumably vaporized by the nuclear fireball. Ten ships were sunk,[89] including theGerman heavy cruiserPrinz Eugen, which sank in December, five months after the test, because radioactivity prevented repairs to a leak in the hull.[90]

Photographs ofBaker are unique among nuclear detonation pictures. The searing, blinding flash that usually obscures the target area took place underwater and was barely seen. The clear image of ships in the foreground and background gives a sense of scale. The largecondensation cloud and the vertical water column are distinctiveBaker shot features. One picture shows a mark where the 27,000-ton battleshipUSS Arkansas was.[91]

As withAble, any ships that remained afloat within 1,000 yards (900 m) of the detonation were seriously damaged, but this time the damage came from below, from water pressure rather than air pressure. The greatest difference between the two shots was the radioactive contamination of all the target ships byBaker. Regardless of the degree of damage, only nine survivingBaker target ships were eventually decontaminated and sold for scrap. The rest were sunk at sea after decontamination efforts failed.[92]

Baker Target array

[edit]
Map showing ship locations for the nuclear explosion of July 25, 1946. The locations of the 10 ships listed in the accompanying table are marked with symbols and numbers.
The array of target ships in Bikini lagoon for theBaker shot of Operation Crossroads. Half of the target ships were outside the area of this map. The ten red X's mark the ten ships that sank. The table (left) contains the key to ship numbers. The black circle, with a radius of 1,000 yards (914 m) from the point of detonation, outlines the area of serious ship damage. The blue circle, 330 yards (302 m) radius, marks the rim of the shallow underwater crater created by the blast, as well as the outer circumference of the hollow water column which envelopedArkansas. The submarines were submerged:Pilotfish, ship #8, to a keel depth of 56 feet (17 m),Apogon, ship #2, to a keel depth of 100 feet (30 m), andSkipjack, ship #41, to 150 feet (46 m).
Ships sunk[93]
#NameTypeDistance from zero tobow
50LSM-60Amphibious0 yd (0 m)
3ArkansasBattleship259 yd (237 m)
8PilotfishSubmarine363 yd (332 m)
10SaratogaAircraft carrier446 yd (408 m)
12YO-160Yard oiler543 yd (497 m)
41SkipjackSubmarine808 yd (739 m)
2ApogonSubmarine846 yd (774 m)
7NagatoBattleship852 yd (779 m)
11ARDC-13Drydock1,276 yd (1,167 m)

Prinz Eugen, ship #36, survived both theAble andBaker tests but was too radioactive to have leaks repaired. In September 1946 she was towed toKwajalein Atoll, where shecapsized in shallow water on December 22. She remains there today, with starboard propeller blades in the air.[94]

The submarineUSS Skipjack was the only sunken ship successfully raised at Bikini.[95] She was towed to California and sunk again, as a target ship off the coast, two years later.[96]

Three other ships, all in sinking condition, were towed ashore at Bikini and beached:[97] attack transportUSS Fallon, ship #25; destroyerUSS Hughes, ship #27; and submarineUSS Dentuda, ship #24.Dentuda, with her crew safely away from their submarine, being submerged (thus avoiding thebase surge) and outside the 1000-yard circle, escaped serious contamination and hull damage and was successfully decontaminated, repaired, and briefly returned to service.[98][99][100]

Sequence of blast events

[edit]

TheBaker shot produced so many unusual phenomena that a conference was held two months later to standardize nomenclature and define new terms for use in descriptions and analysis.[101] The underwater fireball took the form of a rapidly expanding hot gas bubble that pushed against the water, generating asupersonic hydraulic shock wave which crushed the hulls of nearby ships as it spread out. Eventually it slowed to the speed of sound in water, which is one mile per second (1,600 m/s), five times faster than that of sound in air.[102] On the surface, the shock wave was visible as the leading edge of a rapidly expanding ring of dark water, called the "slick" for its resemblance to an oil slick.[103] Close behind the slick was a visually more dramatic but less destructive whitening of the water surface called the "crack".[104]

When the gas bubble's diameter equaled the water depth, 180 feet (55 m), it hit the sea floor and the sea surface simultaneously. At the bottom, it created a shallowcrater 30 feet (9 m) deep and 2,000 feet (610 m) wide.[105] At the top, it pushed the water above it into a "spray dome", which burst through the surface like ageyser. Elapsed time since detonation was four milliseconds.[106]

During the first full second, the expanding bubble removed all the water within a 500-foot (150 m) radius and lifted two million tons[107] of spray and seabed sand into the air. As the bubble rose at 2,500 feet per second (760 m/s),[108] it stretched the spray dome into a hollow cylinder or chimney of spray called the "column", 6,000 feet (1,800 m) tall and 2,000 feet (600 m) wide, with walls 300 feet (90 m) thick.[109]

As soon as the bubble reached the air, it started a supersonic atmospheric shock wave which, like the crack, was more visually dramatic than destructive. Brief low pressure behind the shock wave caused instant fog which shrouded the developing column in a "Wilson cloud", also called a "condensation cloud", obscuring it from view for two seconds. The Wilson cloud started out hemispherical, expanded into a disk which lifted from the water revealing the fully developed spray column, then expanded into a doughnut shape and vanished. TheAble shot also produced a Wilson cloud, but heat from the fireball dried it out more quickly.[109]

By the time the Wilson cloud vanished, the top of the column had become a "cauliflower", and all the spray in the column and its cauliflower was moving down, back into the lagoon. Although cloudlike in shape, the cauliflower was more like the top of a geyser where water stops moving upward and starts to fall. There was no mushroom cloud; nothing rose into the stratosphere.[110]

  • Aerial photo of nuclear explosion rising from lagoon. Hemispherical condensation cloud on the surface is 1 mile (1.6 km) in diameter. In comparison, Navy ships in the foreground look like bathtub toys.
    CrossroadsBaker, showing the white surface "crack" under the ships, and the top of the hollow spray column protruding through the hemispherical Wilson cloud. Bikini Island beach is in the background.
  • The Wilson cloud lifts.
    The Wilson cloud lifts, revealing a vertical black object, larger than ships in the foreground. One popular (but discounted) theory claims that this was the upended battleshipArkansas;[111] in reality, the dark area is caused byArkansas's hull interfering with the development of the spray column, creating a hole in the plume via its presence.[112]
  • The same scene five seconds later, photographed from a camera tower, showing a water column 2,000 feet (600 m) in diameter and 6,000 feet (1,800 m) tall.
    The Wilson cloud has evaporated revealing the cauliflower atop the spray column. Two million tons of water spray fall back into the lagoon. The radioactivebase surge is moving toward the ships.

Meanwhile, lagoon water rushing back into the space vacated by the rising gas bubble started atsunami which lifted the ships as it passed under them. At 11 seconds after detonation, the first wave was 1,000 feet (300 m) from surface zero and 94 feet (29 m) high.[113] By the time it reached the Bikini Island beach, 3.5 miles (6 km) away, it was a nine-wave set with shore breakers up to 15 feet (5 m) high, which tossed landing craft onto the beach and filled them with sand.[114]

Twelve seconds after detonation, falling water from the column started to create a 900-foot (270 m) tall "base surge" resembling the mist at the bottom of a largewaterfall. Unlike the water wave, the base surge rolled over rather than under the ships. Of all the bomb's effects, the base surge had the greatest consequence for most of the target ships, because it painted them with radioactivity that could not be removed.[113] Tactical nuclear warfare advocates described the base surge as generation of very high sea states (GVHSS) disregarding radiation to emphasize the physical damage capable of disabling communication and radar equipment on warship superstructures.[115]

Arkansas

[edit]

Arkansas was the closest ship to the bomb other than the ship from which it was suspended. The underwater shock wave crushed the starboard side of her hull, which faced the bomb, and rolled the battleship over onto her port side. It also ripped off the two starboardpropellers and their shafts, along with therudder and part of the stern, shortening the hull by 25 feet (7.6 m).[116]

She was next seen by Navy divers the same year, lying upside down with her bow on the rim of the underwater bomb crater and stern angled toward the center. There was no sign of thesuperstructure or the big guns. The first diver to reachArkansas sank up to his armpits in radioactive mud. WhenNational Park Service divers returned in 1989 and 1990, the bottom was again firm-packed with sand, and the mud was gone. They were able to see the barrels of the forward guns, which had not been visible in 1946.[117]

All battleships are top-heavy and tend to settle upside down when they sink.Arkansas settled upside down, but a 1989 diver's sketch of the wreck shows hardly any of the starboard side of the hull, making it look like the ship is lying on her side. Most of the starboard side is present but severely compacted.[118]

The superstructure has not been found. It either was stripped off and swept away or is lying under the hull, crushed and buried under sand which flowed back into the crater, partially refilling it. The only diver access to the inside is a tight squeeze through the port sidecasemate, called the "aircastle." The National Park Service divers practiced on the similar casemate of the battleshipUSS Texas, a museum ship, before enteringArkansas in 1990.[119]

Contrary to popular belief,Arkansas was not lifted vertically by the blast of the weapon test. Forensic examination of the wreck during surveys since the test conclusively show that structural failure of hull plating along the starboard side allowed rapid flooding and capsized the ship.[112]

  • Line drawing of partially crushed battleship hull lying upside down on the seabed.
    BattleshipArkansas upside down, 180 feet (55 m) deep in Bikini Lagoon. Diver's sketch from a 1989 National Park Service dive.
  • Underwater photograph of a gun protruding from an opening in the side of a sunken ship.
    Port casemate ofArkansas in 1989, upside down against the bottom. The only diver's access into the ship, it was entered in 1946 and again in 1990.
  • A permanently docked museum ship with a red circle on the photograph to highlight a gun protruding from an opening in the ship's port side.
    A similar battleship,USS Texas, with casemate circled. At Bikini, everything that was above the lower deck guns ofArkansas is either missing or is buried in the sand.

Aircraft carriers

[edit]

Saratoga, placed close toBaker, sank 7.5 hours after the underwater shock wave opened up leaks in the hull. Immediately after the shock wave passed, the water wave lifted the stern 43 feet (13 m) and the bow 29 feet (8.8 m), rocked the ship side to side, and crashed over her, sweeping all five moored airplanes off theflight deck and knocking the stack over onto the deck. She remained upright and outside the spray column but close enough to be drenched by radioactive water from the collapsing cauliflower head as well as by the base surge.[120] Blandy ordered tugs to tow the carrier to Enyu Island for beaching, butSaratoga and the surrounding water remained too radioactive for close approach until after she sank.[121] She settled upright on the bottom, with the top of her mast 40 feet (12 m) below the surface.[122]

USS Independence survivedAble with spectacular damage to the flight deck.[123] She was moored far enough away fromBaker to avoid further physical damage but was severely contaminated. She was towed to San Francisco,[124] where four years of decontamination experiments at theHunters Point Naval Shipyard failed to produce satisfactory results. On January 29, 1951, she was scuttled near theFarallon Islands.[125]

  • Line drawing of aircraft carrier sitting upright on the seabed.
    Diver's sketch ofUSS Saratoga on the bottom of Bikini Lagoon. Starboard torpedo blister is crumpled.
  • Photograph of badly damaged aircraft carrier, afloat with smoke coming from deck.
    USS Independence, ship #28, showing blast damage fromAble, beforeBaker made her radioactive.

Fission-product radioactivity

[edit]

Baker was the first nuclear explosion close enough to the surface to keep the radioactive fission products in the local environment. It was not "self-cleansing." The result was radioactive contamination of the lagoon and the target ships. While anticipated, it caused far greater problems than were expected.[126]

TheBaker explosion produced about 3 pounds (1.4 kg) of fission products.[127][128] These fission products were thoroughly mixed with the two million tons of spray and seabed sand that were lifted into the spray column and its cauliflower head and then dumped back into the lagoon. Most of it stayed in the lagoon and settled to the bottom or was carried out to sea by the lagoon's internal tidal and wind-driven currents.[110]

A small fraction of the contaminated spray was thrown back into the air as the base surge. Unlike the Wilson cloud, a meteorological phenomenon in clean air, the base surge was a heavy fog bank of radioactive mist that rolled across all the target ships, coating their surfaces with fission products.[129] When the mist in the base surge evaporated, the base surge became invisible but continued to move away, contaminating ships several miles from the detonation point.[130]

Unmanned boats were the first vessels to enter the lagoon. Onboard instruments allowed remote-controlled radiation measurements to be made. When support ships entered the lagoon for evaluation, decontamination, and salvage activities, they steered clear of lagoon water hot spots detected by the drone boats. The standard for radiation exposure to personnel was the same as that used by the Manhattan Project: 0.1 roentgens per day.[131] Because of this constraint, only the five most distant target ships could be boarded on the first day.[132] The closer-in ships were hosed down by Navyfireboats using saltwater and flame retardants. The first hosing reduced radioactivity by half, but subsequent hosings were ineffective.[133] For most of the ships, reboarding had to wait until the short-lived radioisotopes decayed; ten days elapsed before the last of the targets could be boarded.[134]

In the first six days afterBaker, when radiation levels were highest, 4,900 men boarded target ships.[135] Sailors tried to scrub off the radioactivity with brushes, water, soap, and lye. Nothing worked, short ofsandblasting to bare metal.[133]

  • Ships silhouetted against an approaching cloud of mist from falling water in the background.
    As the spray column falls, a radioactive "base surge," like mist at the bottom of a waterfall, moves out toward the target ships. Foreground ship (left) is the 725 feet (221 m) long Japanese battleshipNagato.
  • Aerial photo of a fireboat hosing down the stern of a battleship.
    In a largely ineffective effort to wash off base surge contamination, a fireboat hoses down the battleshipNew York with radioactive lagoon water. The ship was outside the area of the above map.
  • Sailors scrubbing down a ship deck.
    Sailors scrubbing down the German cruiserPrinz Eugen with brushes, water, soap, and lye. Five months later, the ship was still too radioactive to permit repairs to a leak, and she sank.

Test animals

[edit]
Aftermath of animal testing during Operation Crossroads

Only pigs, goats and rats were used in theBaker test. All the pigs and most of the rats died. Several days elapsed before sailors were able to board the target ships where test animals were located; during that time the accumulated doses from the gamma rays produced by fission products became lethal for the animals.[136] Since much of the public interest in Operation Crossroads had focused on the fate of the test animals, in September Blandy asserted that radiation death is not painful: "The animal merely languishes and recovers or dies a painless death. Suffering among the animals as a whole was negligible."[137] This was clearly not true. While the well-documented suffering ofHarry Daghlian andLouis Slotin as they died of radiation injury at Los Alamos was still secret, the widely reported radiation deaths at Hiroshima and Nagasaki had not been painless. In 1908, Dr. Charles Allen Porter had stated in an academic paper, "the agony of inflamed X-ray lesions is almost unequalled in any other disease."[98]

Induced radioactivity

[edit]

TheBaker explosion ejected into the environment about twice as many free neutrons as there were fission events. A plutonium fission event produces, on average, 2.9 neutrons, most of which are consumed in the production of more fission, until fission falls off and the remaining uncaptured neutrons escape.[138] In an air burst, most of these environmental neutrons are absorbed by superheated air which rises into the stratosphere, along with the fission products and unfissioned plutonium. In the underwaterBaker detonation, the neutrons were captured by seawater in the lagoon.[139]

Of the four major elements in seawater –hydrogen,oxygen,sodium, andchlorine – only sodium takes on intense, short-term radioactivity with the addition of a single neutron to its nucleus: common sodium-23 becomes radioactivesodium-24, with a 15-hour half-life. In six days, its intensity drops a thousandfold, but the corollary of short half-life is high initial intensity. Other isotopes were produced from seawater:hydrogen-3 (half-life 12 years) fromhydrogen-2,oxygen-17 (stable) fromoxygen-16, andchlorine-36 (half-life about 300,000 years) from chlorine-35, and some trace elements, but scarcity or low short-term intensity (long half-life) rendered them insignificant compared with sodium-24.[139]

Less than one pound of radioactive sodium was produced. If all the neutrons released by the fission of 2 pounds (0.91 kg) of plutonium-239 were captured by sodium-23, 0.4 pounds (0.18 kg) of sodium-24 would result, but sodium did not capture all the neutrons. Unlike fission products, which are heavy and eventually sank to the bottom of the lagoon, the sodium stayed in solution. It contaminated the hulls and onboard salt water systems of support ships that entered the lagoon, as well as the water used in decontamination.[139]

Unfissioned plutonium

[edit]

The 10.6 pounds (4.8 kg) of plutonium which did not undergo fission and the 3 pounds (1.4 kg) of fission products were scattered.[140] Plutonium is not a biological hazard unless ingested or inhaled, and its alpha radiation cannot penetrate skin. Once inside the body it is significantly toxic both radiologically and chemically, having aheavy metal toxicity on a par with that ofarsenic.[141] Estimates based on the Manhattan Project's "tolerance dose" of one microgram of plutonium per worker put 10.6 pounds at the equivalent of about five billion tolerable doses.[142]

Plutonium alpha rays could not be detected by the film badges andGeiger counters used by people who boarded the target ships because alpha particles have very low penetrating power, insufficient to enter the glass detection tube. It was assumed to be present in the environment wherever fission product radiation was detected. The decontamination plan was to scrub the target ships free of fission products and assume the plutonium would be washed away in the process. To see if this plan was working, samples of paint, rust, and other target ship surface materials were taken back to a laboratory on the support shipHaven and examined for plutonium.[143] The tests showed that the plan was not working. The results of these plutonium detection tests, and of tests performed on fish caught in the lagoon, caused all decontamination work to be abruptly terminated on August 10, effectively shutting down Operation Crossroads for safety reasons.[144] Tests conducted on the support shipUSS Rockbridge in November indicated the presence of 2 milligrams (0.031 gr) of plutonium,[145] which represented 2,000 tolerable doses.[146]

FailedBaker cleanup and program termination

[edit]

The program termination on August 10, sixteen days afterBaker, was the result of a showdown between Dr.Stafford Warren, the Army colonel in charge of radiation safety for Operation Crossroads, and Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Special Weapons, Vice Admiral William H. P. Blandy. A radiation safety monitor under Warren's command later described him as "the only Army colonel who ever sank a Navy flotilla."[147]

Warren had been chief of the medical section of the Manhattan Project[148] and was in charge of radiation safety at theTrinity test,[149] as well as of the on-ground inspections at Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the bombings.[150] At Operation Crossroads, it was his job to keep the sailors safe during the cleanup.[151]

Radiation monitoring

[edit]
Extensive structural damage and clean-up attempts on ships

A total of 18,875film badge dosimeters were issued to personnel during the operation. About 6,596 dosimeters were given to personnel who were based on the nearby islands or support ships that had no potential for radiation exposure. The rest were issued to all of the individuals thought to be at the greatest risk for radiological contamination along with a percentage of each group who were working in less contaminated areas. Personnel were removed for one or more days from areas and activities of possible exposure if their badges showed more than 0.1roentgen (R) per day exposure. Experts believed at the time that this radiation dose could be tolerated by individuals for long periods without any harmful effects. The maximum accumulated dose of 3.72 R was received by a radiation safety monitor.[152]

Cleanup issues

[edit]

The cleanup was hampered by two significant factors: the unexpected base surge and the lack of a viable cleanup plan. It was understood that if the water column fell back into the lagoon, which it did, any ships that were drenched by falling water might be contaminated beyond redemption. Nobody expected that to happen to almost the entire target fleet.[153] No decontamination procedures had been tested to see if they would work and to measure the potential risk to personnel. In the absence of a decontamination protocol, the ships were cleaned using traditional deck-scrubbing methods: hoses, mops, and brushes, with water, soap, and lye.[154] The sailors had no protective clothing.[155]

Secondary contamination

[edit]
Aftermath of Operation Crossroads from the air, with extensive ongoing fires on affected vessels

By August 3, Colonel Warren concluded the entire effort was futile and dangerous.[156] The unprotected sailors were stirring up radioactive material and contaminating their skin, clothing, and, presumably, their lungs. When they returned to their support ship living quarters, they contaminated the shower stalls, laundry facilities, and everything they touched. Warren demanded an immediate halt to the entire cleanup operation. He was especially concerned about plutonium, which was undetectable on site.[157]

Warren also observed that theradiation safety procedures were not being followed correctly.[158] Fire boats got too close to the target ships they were hosing and drenched their crews with radioactive spray. One fire boat had to be taken out of service.[158] Film badges showed 67 overdoses between August 6 and 9.[147] More than half of the 320 Geiger counters available shorted out and became unavailable.[159] The crews of two target ships,USS Wainwright andUSS Carteret, moored far from the detonation site, had moved back on board and become overexposed. They were immediately evacuated back to the United States.[160]

Captain L. H. Bibby, commanding officer of the apparently undamaged battleshipNew York, accused Warren's radsafe monitors of holding their Geiger counters too close to the deck.[147] He wanted to reboard his ship and sail it home. The steadily dropping radiation counts on the target ships gave an illusion that the cleanup was working, but Warren explained that although fission products were losing some of their gamma ray potency through radioactive decay, the ships were still contaminated. The danger of ingesting microscopic particles remained.[156]

Warren persuades Blandy

[edit]
Radioactive parts of a fish show as white against a black background.
A radioactivesurgeonfish makes its own x-ray. The bright area is a meal of fresh algae. The rest of the body has absorbed and distributed enough plutonium to make the scales radioactive. The fish was alive and apparently healthy when captured.

Blandy ordered Warren to explain his position to 1,400 skeptical officers and sailors.[147] Some found him persuasive, but it was August 9 before he convinced Blandy. That was the date when Blandy realized, for the first time, that Geiger counters could not detect plutonium.[143] Blandy was aware of the health problems ofradium dial painters who ingested microscopic amounts of radium in the 1920s, and the fact that plutonium was assumed to have a similar biological effect. When plutonium was discovered in the captain's quarters ofPrinz Eugen, unaccompanied by fission products, Blandy realized that plutonium could be anywhere.[161]

The following day, August 10, Warren showed Blandy anautoradiograph of a fish, an x-ray picture made by radiation coming from the fish. The outline of the fish was made by alpha radiation from the fish scales, evidence that plutonium, mimicking calcium, had been distributed throughout the fish, out to the scales. Blandy announced his decision, "then we call it all to a halt." He ordered that all further decontamination work be discontinued.[144] Warren wrote home, "A self x ray of a fish ... did the trick."[144]

The decontamination failure ended plans to outfit some of the target ships for the 1947Charlie shot and to sail the rest home in triumph. The immediate public relations problem was to avoid any perception that the entire target fleet had been destroyed. On August 6, in anticipation of this development, Blandy had told his staff that ships sunk or destroyed more than 30 days after theBaker shot "will not be considered as sunk by the bomb."[162] By then, public interest in Operation Crossroads was waning, and the reporters had gone home. The failure of decontamination did not make news until the final reports came out a year later.[163]

TestCharlie

[edit]
A man in naval uniform and a woman wearing a hat cut into a cake labeled Operation Crossroads, and shaped like a mushroom cloud, while another naval officer looks on.
Blandy and his wife slice into an Operation Crossroads cake shaped like Baker's radioactive geyser, while Rear AdmiralFrank J. Lowry looks on, November 7, 1946

Testing program staff originally set testCharlie for early 1947. They wanted to explode it deep under the surface in the lee of the atoll to test the effect of nuclear weapons as depth charges on unmoored ships.[41] The unanticipated delays in decontaminating the target ships after testBaker[25] prevented the required technical support personnel from assisting withCharlie and also meant that there were no uncontaminated target ships available for use inCharlie. The naval weapons program staff decided the test was less pressing given that the entire U.S. arsenal had only a handful of nuclear weapons and canceled the test. The official reason given for cancelingCharlie was that the program staff felt it was unnecessary because of the success of theAble andBaker tests.[164] The deep ocean effects testing thatCharlie was to have performed were fulfilled nine years later withOperation Wigwam.[165]

Aftermath

[edit]

All ships leak and require the regular operation ofbilge pumps to stay afloat.[166] If their bilge pumps could not be operated, the target ships would eventually sink. Only one suffered this fate:Prinz Eugen, which sank in the Kwajalein lagoon on December 22. The rest were kept afloat long enough to be deliberately sunk or dismantled. After the August 10 decision to stop decontamination work at Bikini, the surviving target fleet was towed to Kwajalein Atoll where the live ammunition and fuel could be offloaded in uncontaminated water. The move was accomplished during the remainder of August and September.[167]

Eight of the major ships and two submarines were towed back to the United States and Hawaii for radiological inspection. Twelve target ships were so lightly contaminated that they were remanned and sailed back to the United States by their crews. Ultimately, only nine target ships were able to be scrapped rather than scuttled. The remaining target ships were scuttled off Bikini or Kwajalein Atolls, or near the Hawaiian Islands or the California coast during 1946–1948.[168] The remains ofIndependence were retained atHunters Point Shipyard until 1951 to test decontamination methods.[169]: 6–24 

The support ships were decontaminated as necessary and received a radiological clearance before they could return to the fleet. This required a great deal of experimentation at Navy shipyards in the United States, primarily in San Francisco at Hunters Point.[169]: 6–15  The destroyerUSS Laffey required "sandblasting and painting of all underwater surfaces, and acid washing and partial replacement of salt-water piping and evaporators."[170]

A survey was conducted in mid-1947 to study long-term effects of the Operation Crossroads tests. According to the official report, decontamination efforts "revealed conclusively that removal of radioactive contamination of the type encountered in the target vessels in testBaker cannot be accomplished successfully."[171]

On August 11, 1947,Life summarized the report in a 14-page article with 33 pictures.[172] The article states, "If all the ships at Bikini had been fully manned, the Baker Day bomb would have killed 35,000 crewmen. If such a bomb were dropped below New York's Battery in a stiff south wind, 2 million people would die."[173]

The contamination problem was not widely appreciated by the general public until 1948, whenNo Place to Hide, a best-selling book byDavid Bradley, was serialized in theAtlantic Monthly, condensed by theReader's Digest, and selected by theBook of the Month Club.[174] In his preface, Bradley, a key member of the Radiological Safety Section at Bikini known as the "Geiger men", asserted that "the accounts of the actual explosions, however well intended, were liberally seasoned with fantasy and superstition, and the results of the tests have remained buried in the vaults of military security."[175] His description of theBaker test and its aftermath brought to world attention the problem of radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons.[176]

Personnel exposure

[edit]
Operation Crossroads ID Card

All Operation Crossroads operations were designed to keep personnel from being exposed to more than 0.1roentgen (R) per day. At the time, this was considered to be an amount of radiation that could be tolerated for long periods without any harmful effects on health. Since there was no special clothing or radiation shielding available, the protection plan relied on managing who went where, when, and for how long.[38]

Radioactively "hot" areas were predicted and then checked with Geiger counters, sometimes by remote control, to see if they were safe. The level of measured gamma radiation determined how long personnel could operate in them without exceeding the allowable daily dose.[38] Instant gamma readings were taken by radiation safety specialists, but film-badge dosimeters, which could be read at the end of the day, were issued to all personnel believed to be at the greatest radiological risk. Anyone whose badge showed more than 0.1 R per day exposure was removed for one or more days from areas and activities of possible exposure. The maximum accumulated exposure recorded was 3.72 R, received by a radiation safety specialist.[38]

A percentage of each group working in less contaminated areas was badged. Eventually, 18,875 film-badgedosimeters were issued to about 15% of the total work force. On the basis of this sampling, a theoretical total exposure was calculated for each person who did not have a personal badge.[38] As expected, exposures for target ship crewmen who boarded their ships afterBaker were higher than those for support ship crews. The hulls of support ships that entered the lagoon afterBaker became so radioactive that sleeping quarters were moved toward the center of each ship.[177] Of the total mass ofradioactive particles scattered by each explosion, 85% was unfissioned plutonium which producesalpha radiation not detected by film badges or Geiger counters. There was no method of detecting plutonium in a timely fashion, and participants were not monitored for ingestion of it.[139]

A summary of film badge readings (in roentgens) for July and August, when the largest number of personnel was involved, is listed below:

Actual film badge readings (+R gamma)
Readings[38]Total00.001–0.10.101–1.01.001–10.0
July3,767 (100%)2,843 (75%)689 (18%)232 (6%)3 (<0.1%)
August6,664 (100%)3,947 (59%)2,139 (32%)570 (9%)8 (0.1%)

Service members who participated in the cleanup of contaminated ships were exposed to unknown amounts of radiation. In 1996, a government-sponsored mortality study of Operation Crossroads veterans[178] showed that, by 1992, 46 years after the tests, veterans had experienced a 4.6% higher mortality than a control group of non-veterans. There were 200 more deaths among Operation Crossroads veterans than in the similar control group (12,520 vs. 12,320), implying a life-span reduction of about three months for Operation Crossroads veterans.[179]Veterans who were exposed to radiation formed the non-profit National Association of Atomic Veterans in 1978 to lobby for veterans benefits covering illnesses they believed were caused by their exposure.[178]

Legislation was passed in 1988 that removed the need for veterans to prove a causal link between certain forms ofcancer and radiation exposure due to nuclear tests.[180] Incidence of the main expected causes of this increased mortality,leukemia and other cancers, was not significantly higher than normal. Death by those diseases was tabulated on the assumption that if radiation exposure had a life-shortening effect it would likely show up there, but it did not. Not enough data were gathered on other causes of death to determine the reason for this increase in all-cause mortality, and it remains a mystery. The mortality increase was higher, 5.7%, for those who boarded target ships after the tests than for those who did not, whose mortality increase was 4.3%.[178]

Bikini Atoll

[edit]
Main article:Bikini Atoll
USSNevada post-Operation Crossroads with extensive damage

The 167 Bikini residents who were moved to the Rongerik Atoll prior to the Crossroads tests were unable to gather sufficient food or catch enough fish and shellfish to feed themselves in their new environment. The Navy left food and water for a few weeks and then failed to return in a timely manner. By January 1947, visitors to Rongerik reported the islanders were sufferingmalnutrition, facing potentialstarvation by July, and wereemaciated by January 1948. In March 1948 they were evacuated to Kwajalein, and then settled onto another uninhabited island,Kili, in November. With only one third of a square mile, Kili has one sixth the land area of Bikini and, more importantly, has no lagoon and no protected harbor. Unable to practice their native culture of lagoon fishing, they became dependent on food shipments. Their 4,000 descendants today are living on several islands and in foreign countries.[33]

Their desire to return to Bikini was thwarted indefinitely by the U.S. decision to resume nuclear testing at Bikini in 1954. During 1954, 1956, and 1958, 21 more nuclear bombs were detonated at Bikini, yielding a total of 75megatons of TNT (310 PJ), equivalent to more than 3,000Baker bombs. Only one was an air burst, the 3.8 megatonRedwingCherokee test. Air bursts distribute fallout in a large area, but surface bursts produce intense local fallout.[181] The first after Crossroads was the dirtiest: the 15 megatonBravo shot ofOperation Castle on March 1, 1954, which was the largest-ever U.S. test. Fallout fromBravo causedradiation injury to Bikini islanders who were living onRongelap Atoll.[182]

The brief attempt to resettle Bikini from 1972 until 1978 was aborted when health problems from radioactivity in the food supply caused the atoll to be evacuated again.Sport divers who visit Bikini to dive on the shipwrecks must eat imported food. The local government elected to close thefly-in fly-out sports diving operation in Bikini lagoon in 2008,[183] and the 2009 diving season was canceled due to fuel costs, unreliable airline service to the island, and a decline in the Bikini Islanders' trust fund which subsidized the operation.[33] After a successful trial in October 2010, the local government licensed a sole provider of dive expeditions on the nuclear ghost fleet at Bikini Atoll starting in 2011. The aircraft carrierSaratoga is the primary attraction of a struggling, high-end sport diving industry.[34]

Legacy

[edit]

Following testBaker decontamination problems, the United States Navy equipped newly constructed ships with a Countermeasure Wash Down System of piping and nozzles to cover exterior surfaces of the ship with a spray of salt water from thefirefighting system whennuclear attack appeared imminent. The film of flowing water would theoretically prevent contaminants from settling into cracks and crevices.[184]

In popular culture

[edit]

The juxtaposition of half-naked islanders with nuclear weapons that had the power to reduce everyone to a primitive state provided some with an inspirational motif. During Operation Crossroads, Paris swimwear designerLouis Réard adopted the nameBikini for hisminimalist swimsuit design which, revolutionary for the time, exposed the wearer's navel. He explained that "like the bomb, the bikini is small and devastating".[185] Fashion writerDiana Vreeland described the bikini as the "atom bomb of fashion".[185] While two-piece swimsuits have been used since antiquity, it was Réard's name of theBikini that stuck for all of its modern incarnations.[186]

ArtistBruce Conner madeCrossroads, a 1976 video assembled from the official films, with an audio collage fashioned byPatrick Gleeson on a Moog synthesizer and a drone composition performed on an electric organ byTerry Riley. A commentator atThe New York Review of Books called the experience of watching the video the "nuclear sublime."[187]

Films and TV shows have used archive footage of the testBaker explosion in a fictitious capacity. In the animated comedy seriesSpongeBob SquarePants, the footage is used three times; in the season 2 episode "Dying for Pie", in the season 5 episode "The Krusty Plate", and in the season 8 episode "Frozen Face-Off". One film example,TriStar Pictures'Godzilla from 1998, uses theBaker test footage in the film's opening to depict the atomic bomb responsible for the creation of the titular monster. InGodzilla Minus One, Operation Crossroads was the cause of Godzilla's mutation in the first place, with the film's novelisation elaborating thatBaker was the specific detonation responsible. The testBaker explosion archival footage is also used in theStanley Kubrick filmDr. Strangelove.[188] The footage plays during the ending montage of the movie accompanied byVera Lynn singing "We'll Meet Again".[189]

See also

[edit]
  • Wōdejebato – a nearby seamount explored and mapped during these tests.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Weisgall 1994, p. ix.
  2. ^Strauss 1962, pp. 208–209.
  3. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 19–22.
  4. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 14–15.
  5. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 10.
  6. ^abWeisgall 1994, p. 16.
  7. ^Peterson 1946, quoted inWeisgall 1994, p. 17.
  8. ^Christman 1998, pp. 3–5.
  9. ^Christman 1998, pp. 210–211.
  10. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 30–31.
  11. ^Shurcliff 1946, pp. 28–29.
  12. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 126.
  13. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 67.
  14. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 68–69.
  15. ^Newson 1945, p. 4, quoted inWeisgall 1994, p. 216.
  16. ^abBulletin Editors 1946, p. 1.
  17. ^Delgado 1991, Ch 2.
  18. ^Bird, Kai;Sherwin, Martin J. (2005).American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. pp. 349–350.ISBN 978-0-375-41202-8.OCLC 56753298.
  19. ^Szilard 1978, p. 184.
  20. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 90.
  21. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 94. Despite the postponement, only 13 members of Congress witnessed theAble test, and 7 witnessed theBaker test.Shurcliff 1947, p. 185.
  22. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 79.
  23. ^Letter, Brig. Gen. T. J. Betts, USA, to Peter Brambir, March 21, 1946, filed in Protest Answers, National Archives Record Group 374. Cited inDelgado 1991, Ch 2.
  24. ^Shurcliff 1946, pp. 16–17.
  25. ^abcdefDaly 1986. The bomb yields are often reported as 21 kilotons, but the figure of 23 kilotons is used consistently throughout this article perWeisgall 1994, p. 186.
  26. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 117.
  27. ^Parsons, Rear Admiral. "Subject: site for atomic bomb experiments, May 12, 1948." Appendix to U.S. Commanding Lieutenant General J. E. Hull's memorandum to the U.S. Army Chief of Staff, "Subject: location of proving ground for atomic weapons." Quoted in:Radioactive Heaven and Earth: The health and environmental effects of nuclear weapons testing in, on, and above the earth: A report of the IPPNW International Commission to Investigate the Health and Environmental Effects of Nuclear Weapons Production and the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (1991) p. 70ISBN 0-945257-34-1. Accessed February 23, 2019
  28. ^Bikini failed to meet one of the stipulated weather criteria: "predictable winds directionally uniform from sea level to 60,000 feet (18 km)."Daly 1986, p. 68.
  29. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 31–33.
  30. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 105, 106.
  31. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 107.
  32. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 113.
  33. ^abc*Niedenthal, Jack (2013),A Short History of the People of Bikini Atoll, retrievedMay 4, 2013.
  34. ^ab"Bikini Atoll Diving Charter". Indies Trader Marine Adventures. RetrievedApril 14, 2013.
  35. ^Shurcliff 1946, pp. 22–27.
  36. ^abShurcliff 1946, p. 119.
  37. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 124.
  38. ^abcdefNavy History and Heritage Command 2002
  39. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 106.
  40. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 33.
  41. ^abcWaters 1986, pp. 72–74.
  42. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 32.
  43. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 111.
  44. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 9.
  45. ^Network, News Corp Australia (July 26, 2016)."New footage reveals Bikini Atoll atomic bomb test aftermath".New Zealand Herald.ISSN 1170-0777. RetrievedJuly 26, 2016.
  46. ^"NatlSecurityArchive on Twitter". RetrievedJuly 26, 2016.
  47. ^"Video6".YouTube. Archived fromthe original on July 24, 2016. RetrievedMarch 13, 2019.
  48. ^Bradley 1948, pp. 40, 91.
  49. ^Shurcliff 1947, pp. 109, 155.
  50. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 286.
  51. ^"Atomic Goddess Revisited: Rita Hayworth's Bomb Image Found". CONELRAD Adjacent (blog). August 13, 2013. RetrievedMarch 11, 2015.
  52. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 263–265.
  53. ^abUnited States Nuclear Tests: July 1945 through September 1992 (DOENV-209 REV15)(PDF) (Report). Las Vegas, NV: Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office. December 1, 2000. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on October 12, 2006. RetrievedDecember 18, 2013.
  54. ^abYang, Xiaoping; North, Robert; Romney, Carl (August 2000). CMR Nuclear Explosion Database (Revision 3) (Report). SMDC Monitoring Research.
  55. ^Norris, Robert Standish; Cochran, Thomas B. (February 1, 1994)."United States nuclear tests, July 1945 to 31 December 1992 (NWD 94-1)"(PDF).Nuclear Weapons Databook Working Paper. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on October 29, 2013. RetrievedOctober 26, 2013.
  56. ^Operation Crossroads, 1946 (DNA-6032F)(PDF) (Report). Defense Nuclear Agency. May 1, 1984. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on February 1, 2014. RetrievedJanuary 6, 2014.
  57. ^abcSublette, Carey."Nuclear Weapons Archive". RetrievedJanuary 6, 2014.
  58. ^"18.11.3 - B-29 44-27354, 58th Wing, 509th Composite Group aircraft that dropped the atomic bomb in Test Able of Operation Crossroads. Task Group 1.5 was the Army Air Force group of the task force and consisted of approximately 2,200 people. They were largely from SAC and were placed under the command of Brigadier General Roger M. Ramey, Commanding General of the 58th Bomb Wing. General Ramey's group was responsible for delivering the first Crossroads atomic bomb and provided the aircraft to photograph the explosion and collect scientific data.On July 1, 1946 Dave's Dream, a B-29 piloted by Major Woodrow P. Swancutt, assigned to the 509th Group temporarily stationed at Kwajalein, dropped an atomic bomb on 73 ships lying off of Bikini Island. Five ships were sunk and nine were badly damaged. Task Group 1.5 participated in the second phase of Operation Crossroads, the underwater explosion on July 25, 1946 by providing numerous aircraft for photographic, data collection, and support functions. Pilot Major Woodrow Swancutt is on the right1st Lt. Robert M. Glenn - Flight EngineerT/Sgt. Jack Cothran - Radio OperatorCpl. Herbert Lyons - Left ScannerCpl. Roland M. Medlin - Right ScannerCapt. William C. Harrison, Jr. - Co-PilotMajor Woodrow P. Swancutt - PilotMajor Harold H. Wood - BombardierCapt. Paul Chenchar, Jr. - Radar Operator | National Museum of Nuclear Science & History".nuclearmuseum.pastperfectonline.com. RetrievedApril 9, 2025.
  59. ^Campbell 2005, pp. 18, 186–189.
  60. ^Shurcliff 1946, pp. 130–135.
  61. ^Delgado 1991, p. 26.
  62. ^New York Times, July 1, 1946, p. 1.
  63. ^New York Times, July 2, 1946, p. 3.
  64. ^Delgado 1991, p. 86.
  65. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 114.
  66. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 201–202.
  67. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 188.
  68. ^Shurcliff 1946, pp. 134–135.
  69. ^Data in the table and the map come fromDelgado 1991. TheAble map is on p. 16, theBaker map on p. 17, and ship damage and distances on pp. 86–87. The full text of this reference is posted on the Internet (see link in Sources, below).
  70. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 189.
  71. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 165.
  72. ^Shurcliff 1946, pp. 165, 166, 168.
  73. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 197.
  74. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 190.
  75. ^Hansen 1995, p. 154, Vol 8, Table A-1. andGlasstone & Dolan 1977, pp. 409, 622.
  76. ^abFletcher 1977.
  77. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 143.
  78. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 193.
  79. ^Bradley 1948, p. 70.
  80. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 218–221.
  81. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 108.
  82. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 140.
  83. ^"Animals as Cold Warriors". Online Exhibit at the National Library of Medicine. RetrievedMay 4, 2013.
  84. ^"Myth of Pig 311 Finally Cleared,"Lewiston Daily Sun, July 22, 1946.
  85. ^Life Editors 1947, p. 77. These two goats, on the attack transportNiagara, may have been far enough away to survive.Delgado 1991, p. 22.
  86. ^Shurcliff 1947, pp. 140–144.
  87. ^Life Editors 1947, p. 76.
  88. ^Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 580.
  89. ^Shurcliff 1947, pp. 164–166.
  90. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 275.
  91. ^The upending was reported by Operation Crossroads participants and depicted in two contemporary drawings (seeBattleship Arkansas Being Tossed in Giant Pillar), but two authors have suggested that what looks like the silhouette of a vertical battleship hull is actually a gap in the water column, an upside-down rain shadow, caused by the unseen, still-horizontal hull ofArkansas as it blocks the rise of water in the column. This explanation was described as a possibility inShurcliff 1947, pp. 155, 156. Delgado stated it as a certainty inDelgado 1991, pp. 55, 88, and again inDelgado 1996, p. 75.
  92. ^The fate of 13 small landing craft is unknown; they may have been sold for scrap, rather than scuttled.Delgado 1991, p. 33.
  93. ^Shurcliff, William A. (November 18, 1946)."Technical Report of Operation Crossroads"(PDF).Defense Technical Information Center. Joint Task Force One. pp. 280–281. RetrievedJuly 25, 2024.
  94. ^Delgado 1991, pp. 60–64. In 1978, her port propeller was salvaged and is preserved at the German Naval Memorial atLaboe.
  95. ^Delgado 1996, p. 83.
  96. ^"USS Skipjack (SS-184)". United States Navy. Archived fromthe original on June 14, 2013. RetrievedApril 14, 2013.
  97. ^Delgado 1996, p. 87.
  98. ^abWeisgall 1994, p. 229.
  99. ^"Dentuda (SS-335)". Naval History and Heritage Command. April 21, 2016. RetrievedJuly 23, 2024.
  100. ^Gaasterland, C.L. (1947)."OPERATION CROSSROADS. U.S.S. DENTUDA (SS335). TEST BAKER"(PDF). JOINT TASK FORCE ONE WASHINGTON DC. p. 10. RetrievedJuly 23, 2024.
  101. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 151.
  102. ^Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 244.
  103. ^Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 48.
  104. ^Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 49.
  105. ^Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 251.
  106. ^Glasstone & Dolan 1977, pp. 49, 50.
  107. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 156.
  108. ^Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 50.
  109. ^abShurcliff 1947, pp. 150–156.
  110. ^abWeisgall 1994, p. 225.
  111. ^Two video frames taken from the 1988 Robert Stone documentary filmRadio Bikini, at times 42:44 and 42:45. Eyewitness reports atWeisgall 1994, pp. 162–163. On August 2, 1946, the Preliminary Statement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Evaluation Board said, "From some of the photographs, it appears that this column lifted the 26,000-ton battleshipArkansas for a brief interval before the vessel plunged to the bottom of the lagoon. Confirmation of this must await the analysis of high-speed photographs which are not yet available".Shurcliff 1947, p. 196. The video frames shown here were first made public in 1988 when Robert Stone got permission to use them in his documentary film. They are viewable on the Internet at sonicbomb.com, 39 seconds into the video,"Baker". RetrievedNovember 3, 2008.[permanent dead link]
  112. ^ab"National Park Service: The Archeology of the Atomic Bomb (Chapter 4)".www.nps.gov. RetrievedSeptember 26, 2019.
  113. ^abGlasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 52.
  114. ^Shurcliff 1947, plate 29.
  115. ^Brown, Peter J. (1986). "Blue-out and Nuclear Sea States".Proceedings.112 (1).United States Naval Institute: 104&105.
  116. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 151.
  117. ^Delgado 1996, pp. 119, 120.
  118. ^Delgado 1991, p. 95.
  119. ^Delgado 1996, p. 117.
  120. ^Delgado 1991, p. 101.
  121. ^Shurcliff 1946, p. 213.
  122. ^Davis 1994.
  123. ^Shurcliff 1946, pp. 154–157.
  124. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 261.
  125. ^"USSIndependence (CVL-22)". United States Navy. Archived fromthe original on September 25, 2000. RetrievedApril 14, 2013.
  126. ^Memorandum, Col. A. W. Betts, USACOE, to Brig. Gen. K. D. Nichols, MED, USACOE, August 10, 1946, quoted inDelgado 1996, p. 87.
  127. ^The conversion ratio of fission to energy is one pound (0.45 kg) of fission per eight kilotons of energy. The 23-kiloton yield of theBaker device indicates that just under three pounds (1.4 kg) of plutonium-239 became fission products.Glasstone 1967, p. 481.
  128. ^Shurcliff 1947, pp. 167, 168, & plate 28.
  129. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 159.
  130. ^Glasstone & Dolan 1977, pp. 53–55.
  131. ^Delgado 1996, p. 85.
  132. ^Delgado 1991, p. 28.
  133. ^abDelgado 1991, p. 29.
  134. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 168.
  135. ^Delgado 1996, p. 175.
  136. ^Shurcliff 1947, pp. 166–167.
  137. ^Shurcliff 1947, p. 167.
  138. ^Glasstone 1967, p. 486.
  139. ^abcdDelgado 1996, p. 86.
  140. ^The total amount of plutonium in the core, later called the pit, was 13.6 pounds (6.2 kg), 3 pounds (1.4 kg) of which fissioned.Coster-Mullen 2003, p. 45.
  141. ^"Plutonium".World Nuclear Association. Archived fromthe original on March 30, 2010. RetrievedMay 4, 2013.
  142. ^On December 17, 1945, Henry Newson, in a memo to Los Alamos director Norris Bradbury, had estimated that forBaker, "there will probably be enough plutonium near the surface to poison the combined forces of the United States at their highest wartime strength. The fission products will be worse."Weisgall 1994, p. 216.
  143. ^abWeisgall 1994, p. 241.
  144. ^abcWeisgall 1994, p. 242.
  145. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 272.
  146. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 238.
  147. ^abcdWeisgall 1994, p. 236.
  148. ^Compton 1956, p. 179.
  149. ^Groves 1962, p. 298.
  150. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 209–210.
  151. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 211–213.
  152. ^"Operation Crossroads: Fact Sheet". U.S. Defense Nuclear Agency, Defense Nuclear Agency. 1984. RetrievedMay 4, 2015.
  153. ^According to a Navy report, the base surge spread contamination seven miles (11 km) downwind and severely contaminated all but nine of the ninety-five target vessels.Weisgall 1994, pp. 223, 224.
  154. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 230.
  155. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 231.
  156. ^abWeisgall 1994, p. 239.
  157. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 238–242.
  158. ^abWeisgall 1994, p. 232.
  159. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 213.
  160. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 237.
  161. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 235–236.
  162. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 240.
  163. ^Life Editors 1947, p. 88.
  164. ^Weisgall 1994, pp. 259–261.
  165. ^"Operation Wigwam"(PDF).Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on February 18, 2013. RetrievedApril 14, 2013.
  166. ^Oertling 1996, p. xv.
  167. ^Delgado 1991, p. 31.
  168. ^Delgado 1991, pp. 32, 33.
  169. ^abHistorical Radiological Assessment, Volume II, Use of General Radioactive Materials, 1939–2003, Hunters Point Shipyard(PDF) (Report). United States Department of the Navy. 2004. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on October 22, 2021. RetrievedJanuary 2, 2018.
  170. ^Delgado 1991, p. 33.
  171. ^Director of Ship Material, JTF-1, "Technical Inspection Report, Radiological Inspection of Target and Non-Target Vessels", Armed Forces Special Weapons Project, 1947, National Archives, quoted inDelgado 1996, p. 86.
  172. ^Warren 1947, pp. 86–88.
  173. ^Life Editors 1947, p. 75.
  174. ^Delgado 1996, p. 173.
  175. ^Bradley 1948, p. xii.
  176. ^Fox, Margalit (January 30, 2009)."David Bradley, 92, Author, Antinuclear Advocate, Champion Skier and State Legislator, Is Dead".The New York Times.
  177. ^Interview with Rear Admiral Robert Conard, MC, USNR (Ret.) in Setauket, NY, November 9, 1993, conducted by Jan K. Herman, Historian, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery"Interview". Department of the Navy – Naval Historical Center. August 11, 2002. Archived fromthe original on June 18, 2009. RetrievedSeptember 27, 2009.
  178. ^abcInstitute of Medicine 1996
  179. ^The study did not publish life-span figures, but actuarial tables predict about 800 deaths per year for a group that size as they approach 70 years in age. Two hundred extra deaths would put the Operation Crossroads veterans about three months ahead of their peers on the mortality curve. Social Security Online, Actuarial Publications, Period Life Table"Table". www.socialsecurity.gov. April 22, 2009. RetrievedNovember 10, 2009.
  180. ^Weisgall 1994, p. 278.
  181. ^Hansen 1995, p. 154, Vol VII, Table A-1.
  182. ^Delgado 1996, p. 176.
  183. ^"Bikini Atoll Dive Tourism Information". Kili/Bikini/Ejit Local Government Council. RetrievedApril 14, 2013.
  184. ^"United States Navy CMWDS". Archived fromthe original on January 12, 2015. RetrievedMay 4, 2013.
  185. ^abRosebush, Judson."1945–1950: The Very First Bikini". Bikini Science. Archived fromthe original on June 27, 2012. RetrievedNovember 25, 2012.
  186. ^Eveleth, Rose (July 5, 2013)."The Bikini's Inventor Guessed How Much It Would Horrify the Public".Smithsonian.com. RetrievedJanuary 22, 2017.
  187. ^The Creepy World of Bruce Conner,New York Review of Books, July 15, 2016. Includes link to the video.
  188. ^Peacock, Timothy Noël (July 22, 2021)."From Crossroads to Godzilla: the cinematic legacies of the first postwar nuclear tests".The Conversation. RetrievedFebruary 3, 2024.
  189. ^"We'll Meet Again: The story of Dame Vera Lynn's wartime classic". June 18, 2020. RetrievedFebruary 3, 2024.

References

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toOperation Crossroads.
Operations
Test
areas
New Mexico
Nevada
Mississippi
Alaska
Colorado
Other
Related
topics
Sites
Administrators
Scientists
Operations
Weapons
Related topics
Portal:
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Crossroads&oldid=1314367216"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp