Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Open Syllabus Project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Open-source syllabus database

Open Syllabus Project
Screenshot
Homepage on 3 October 2022
Type of business501(c)(3) corporation[1]
Type of site
Digital database
Available inEnglish
HeadquartersNew York City, U.S.[1]
Country of originUnited States
Area servedWorldwide
OwnerOpen Syllabus Inc.[1]
PresidentJoe Karaganis
Managing directorJoe Karaganis
Key people
IndustryEducational research
RevenueIncrease $1,942,525 (2020)[1]
Total assetsIncrease $1,579,393 (2020)[1]
EmployeesIncrease 5 (2020)[1]
URLopensyllabus.org
CommercialNo
RegistrationNone
LaunchedJanuary 2016; 9 years ago (2016-01)
Current statusActive
OCLC number973953893
According to their 2020Form 990.[1]

TheOpen Syllabus Project (OSP) is an onlineopen-source platform that catalogs and analyzes millions of collegesyllabi.[3] Founded by researchers from theAmerican Assembly atColumbia University, the OSP has amassed the most extensive collection of searchable syllabi. Since itsbeta launch in 2016, the OSP has collected over 7 million course syllabi from over 80 countries, primarily byscraping publicly accessible university websites. The project is directed by Joe Karaganis.

History

[edit]

The OSP was formed by a group ofdata scientists,sociologists, anddigital-humanities researchers at theAmerican Assembly, a public-policy institute based atColumbia University. The OSP was partly funded by theSloan Foundation and theArcadia Fund.[4] Joe Karaganis, former vice-president of the American Assembly, serves as the project director of the OSP.[5] The project builds on prior attempts to archive syllabi, such asH-Net,MIT OpenCourseWare, and historianDan Cohen's defunctSyllabus Finder website (Cohen now sits on the OSP's advisory board).[6] The OSP became anon-profit and independent of the American Assembly in November 2019.[7]

In January 2016, the OSP launched abeta version of their "Syllabus Explorer," which they had collected data for since 2013. The Syllabus Explorer allows users to browse and search texts from over one million college course syllabi.[8] The OSP launched a more comprehensive version 2.0 of the Syllabus Explorer in July 2019. The newer version includes an interactive visualization that displays texts as dots on aknowledge map.[9][10] As of 2022[update], the OSP has collected over 7 million course syllabi.[11] The Syllabus Explorer represents the "largest collection of searchable syllabi ever amassed."[12]

Methodology

[edit]

The OSP has collected syllabi data from over 80 countries[13] dating to 2000.[4] The syllabi stem from over 4,000 worldwide institutions.[14] Most of the OSP's data originates from the United States. Canada, Australia, and the U.K also have largedatasets.[10]

The OSP primarily collects syllabi byscraping publicly accessible university websites.[12] The OSP also allows syllabi submissions from faculty, students, and administrators.[15] The OSP developers usemachine learning andnatural language processing to extractmetadata from such syllabi.[16] Since only metadata is collected, no individual syllabus orpersonal identifying information is found in the OSP database.[17] The OSP classifies the syllabi into 62 subject fields – corresponding to theU.S. Department of Education'sClassification of Instructional Programs (CIP).[12] Additionally, the OSP assigns each text a "teaching score" from 0–100. This score represents the text'spercentile rank among citations in the total citation count and is a numerical indicator of therelative frequency of which a particular work is taught.[18] The OSP also has data on which texts are most likely to be assigned together.[19]

The developers behind the OSP admit that the database is incomplete and likely contains "a fair number of errors."[20] Karaganis estimates that 80–100 million syllabi exist in the United States alone. The OSP is unable to access syllabi behind privatecourse-management software likeBlackboard.[4]

Notable findings

[edit]
A chart, with data from the Open Syllabus Project, showing the most assigned books in college from each of the 50U.S. states.

Anthropology

[edit]

Using data from the OSP,anthropologistLaurence Ralph uncovered that black anthropologists are "woefully under-represented in (if not erased from) most anthropology syllabi."[21] Black authors wrote less than 1 percent of the top 1,000 assigned works.[22]

Economics

[edit]

The database indicatesGreg Mankiw is the most frequently cited author for college economics courses.[23]

English literature

[edit]

The OSP found thatMary Shelley'sFrankenstein was the most widely taught novel in college courses.[24][25][26] Additionally, the majority of novels published after 1945 taught in English classes werehistorical fiction.[27]

Female writers

[edit]

The most read female writer on college campuses isKate L. Turabian for herA Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations.[28][29] Turabian is followed byDiana Hacker,Toni Morrison,Jane Austen, andVirginia Woolf.[30][31]

Film

[edit]

The most assigned film according to the OSP is the 1929 Soviet documentary film,Man with a Movie Camera. English filmmakerAlfred Hitchcock is the most assigned director in college courses.[32]

History

[edit]

HistoriansGeorge Brown Tindall andDavid Emory Shi'sAmerica: A Narrative History is the number one assigned textbook for history, followed byAnne Moody's memoir,Coming of Age in Mississippi.[33]

Philosophy

[edit]

The most assigned texts in the field ofphilosophy includeAristotle'sNicomachean Ethics,John Stuart Mill'sUtilitarianism, andPlato'sRepublic.[34][35] Plato'sRepublic was also the second most assigned text in universities in theEnglish-speaking world (only behindStrunk andWhite'sElements of Style).[34]

Physics

[edit]

David Halliday's et al.Fundamentals of Physics is the number one ranked physics textbook in the OSP's database.[36]

Political science

[edit]

Data from the OSP indicates that the dominantpolitical science texts are written almost exclusively by white men and scholars based inthe West.[37] In the top 200 most-frequently assigned works, 15 are authored by at least one woman.[38]

Public administration

[edit]

American presidentWoodrow Wilson's article "The Study of Administration" was the most frequently assigned text inpublic affairs and administration syllabi.[39]

Reception

[edit]

According toWilliam Germano et al., the OSP is a "fascinating resource but is also prone to misrepresenting or at least distracting us from the most important business of a syllabus: communicatingwith students."[40]

HistorianWilliam Caferro remarks that the OSP is a "tacit experience of sharing, but a useful one."[41]

English professor Bart Beaty writes that, "Despite the many reservations about the completeness of its data, the OSP provides a rare opportunity for scholars to move beyond the anecdotal in discussions of canon-formation in teaching."[42]

Media theoristElizabeth Losh opines that "big data approaches", like the OSP, may "raise troubling questions for instructors aboutinformed consent,pedagogical privacy, and quantified metrics."[43]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^McClure also serves as the project'sChief Technologist.[2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghijk"Open Syllabus Inc".ProPublica. September 14, 2022. RetrievedSeptember 28, 2022.
  2. ^"People".Open Syllabus Project. RetrievedSeptember 30, 2022.
  3. ^M. Beliso-De Jesús, Aisha; Pierre, Jemima (March 2020)."Special Section: Anthropology of White Supremacy".American Anthropologist.122 (1).Wiley-Blackwell: 6.doi:10.1111/aman.13351.ISSN 0002-7294.S2CID 213556202.
  4. ^abcNowogrodzki, Anna (October 31, 2016)."Mining the secrets of college syllabuses".Nature.539 (7627):125–126.Bibcode:2016Natur.539..125N.doi:10.1038/539125a.ISSN 1476-4687.PMID 27808216.S2CID 4466400.
  5. ^Herrera, Jack (April 18, 2016)."Open Syllabus Project gives empirical insight into curriculum debates".The Stanford Daily. RetrievedSeptember 30, 2022.
  6. ^Noonan, Daniel W. (2015). "Does Size Matter in the Digital Age? Reappraisal Considerations for Syllabi".Archival Issues.37 (1): 16.ISSN 1067-4993.JSTOR 24590114.
  7. ^"The Open Syllabus Project".The American Assembly. January 30, 2016. RetrievedSeptember 30, 2022.
  8. ^Ward, Alex (February 26, 2016)."Open Syllabus Project Releases Syllabus Explorer".Chicago Maroon. RetrievedSeptember 30, 2022.
  9. ^Young, Jeffrey R. (July 19, 2019)."How a Database of 6 Million Syllabi Could Spawn a New Measure of Scholarly Impact".EdSurge. RetrievedOctober 1, 2022.
  10. ^abSchwab, Katharine (July 16, 2019)."This historic map of 6 million syllabi reveals how college is changing".Fast Company. Archived fromthe original on March 8, 2022.
  11. ^Graham, Shawn; Milligan, Ian; Weingart, Scott B.; Martin, Kimberley (2022).Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian's Macroscope (2nd ed.).World Scientific. p. 13.doi:10.1142/p981.ISBN 978-981-12-4305-9.S2CID 109639779.
  12. ^abcHubbard, David E.; Vaaler, Alyson (January 1, 2021)."An exploratory study of library science journal articles in syllabi".The Journal of Academic Librarianship.47 (1) 102261.Elsevier.doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102261.ISSN 0099-1333.S2CID 228830827.
  13. ^Beckwith, Ryan Teague (September 7, 2019)."Trump Changed U.S. Politics. Now He's Changing Political Science".Bloomberg.
  14. ^Delli, K.; Livas, C.; Spijkervet, F.K.L.; Vissink, A. (May 16, 2017)."Measuring the social impact of dental research: An insight into the most influential articles on the Web".Oral Diseases.23 (8).Wiley-Blackwell: 1156.doi:10.1111/odi.12714.PMID 28734099.S2CID 22092987.
  15. ^Friedman, Alon (March 15, 2018)."Measuring the promise of Big Data syllabi".Technology, Pedagogy and Education.27 (2).Routledge: 137.doi:10.1080/1475939X.2017.1408490.ISSN 1475-939X.S2CID 67092462.
  16. ^Rikard, Andrew (August 4, 2016)."More Than a Million Syllabuses at Your Fingertips".EdSurge. RetrievedOctober 2, 2022.
  17. ^Daniels, Jessie; Thistlethwaite, Polly (2016).Being a Scholar in the Digital Era: Transforming Scholarly Practice for the Public Good.Policy Press. p. 122.doi:10.1332/policypress/9781447329251.001.0001.ISBN 978-1-4473-2925-1.
  18. ^Rutherford, Markella;Levitt, Peggy (November 4, 2020)."Who's on the Syllabus?: World Literature According to the US Pedagogical Canon".Journal of World Literature.5 (4).Brill Publishers: 621.doi:10.1163/24056480-00504009.ISSN 2405-6472.S2CID 228898017.
  19. ^Munguia, Hayley (February 19, 2016)."Everyone Still Reads 'To Kill A Mockingbird'".FiveThirtyEight. RetrievedOctober 3, 2022.
  20. ^Ingraham, Christopher (February 3, 2016)."What Ivy League students are reading that you aren't".The Washington Post.ISSN 0190-8286. RetrievedSeptember 29, 2022.
  21. ^Barron, Nicholas (July 2021)."Renegades or liberals? Recent reflections on the Boasian legacies in American anthropology".History of the Human Sciences.34 (3–4).Sage Publications: 368.doi:10.1177/0952695120941195.ISSN 0952-6951.S2CID 225384693.
  22. ^Craven, Christa (March 9, 2021)."Teaching Antiracist Citational Politics as a Project of Transformation: Lessons from the Cite Black Women Movement for White Feminist Anthropologists".Feminist Anthropology.2 (1).Wiley-Blackwell:4–5.doi:10.1002/fea2.12036.ISSN 2643-7961.S2CID 233623512.
  23. ^Schwittay, Anke (2021).Creative Universities: Reimagining Education for Global Challenges and Alternative Futures.Bristol University Press. p. 79.ISBN 978-1-5292-1365-2.
  24. ^Scott, Amanda (2019). Pilkington, Olga A.; Pilkington, Ace G. (eds.).Lab Lit: Exploring Literary and Cultural Representations of Science.Lexington Books. p. 13.ISBN 978-1-4985-6599-8.
  25. ^Prose, Francine (June 16, 2016)."How Frankenstein's Monster Became Human".The New Republic.ISSN 0028-6583. RetrievedOctober 3, 2022.
  26. ^Finn, Ed; Guston, David H. (December 29, 2017)."'Frankenstein' Has Become a True Monster".The Wall Street Journal.ISSN 0099-9660. RetrievedOctober 10, 2022.
  27. ^Manshel, Alexander (March 23, 2021)."Colson Whitehead's History of the United States".MELUS.45 (4).Oxford University Press: 24.doi:10.1093/melus/mlaa051.ISSN 0163-755X.
  28. ^Johnson, David (February 25, 2016)."These Are the 100 Most-Read Female Writers in College Classes".Time. RetrievedSeptember 28, 2022.
  29. ^Gump, Steven E. (October 2019)."Kate L. Turabian. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations: Chicago Style for Students and Researchers".Journal of Scholarly Publishing.51 (1).University of Toronto Press: 100.doi:10.3138/jsp.51.1.06.ISSN 1198-9742.S2CID 210531081.
  30. ^Johnson, Alex (May 8, 2018)."What are students reading at the best universities?".The Independent. RetrievedOctober 9, 2022.
  31. ^Mumford, Tracy (March 1, 2016)."The 25 most frequently assigned women authors".MPR News. RetrievedOctober 9, 2022.
  32. ^Dam, Andrew Van (September 9, 2022)."States with the worst brain drain – and more!".The Washington Post. RetrievedOctober 4, 2022.
  33. ^Ha, Thu-Huong (January 27, 2016)."These are the books students at the top US colleges are required to read".Quartz. RetrievedOctober 2, 2022.
  34. ^abBaltzly, Dirk; Miles, Graeme;Finamore, John F., eds. (2018).Proclus: Commentary on Plato's Republic.Cambridge University Press. p. 1.ISBN 978-1-108-56293-5.
  35. ^Marks, Jonathan (2021).Let's Be Reasonable: A Conservative Case for Liberal Education.Princeton University Press. p. 110.ISBN 978-0-691-20771-1.
  36. ^Paoletti, Teo; Lee, Hwa Young; Rahman, Zareen; Vishnubhotla, Madhavi; Basu, Debasmita (June 1, 2022)."Comparing graphical representations in mathematics, science, and engineering textbooks and practitioner journals".International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.53 (7).Taylor & Francis: 8.Bibcode:2022IJMES..53.1815P.doi:10.1080/0020739X.2020.1847336.ISSN 0020-739X.S2CID 230533709.
  37. ^Matthews, Sally (July 2, 2020). "Reviewing the South African Political Studies Curriculum: Evaluating Responses to Calls for Decolonisation".Politikon.47 (3).Routledge:335–336.doi:10.1080/02589346.2020.1796000.ISSN 0258-9346.S2CID 221115270.
  38. ^Sumner, Jane Lawrence (April 2018)."The Gender Balance Assessment Tool (GBAT): A Web-Based Tool for Estimating Gender Balance in Syllabi and Bibliographies".PS: Political Science & Politics.51 (2).Cambridge University Press:396–400.doi:10.1017/S1049096517002074.ISSN 1049-0965.S2CID 159013812.
  39. ^Herbel, Jerry (July 3, 2018)."Humanism and bureaucracy: The case for a liberal arts conception of public administration".Journal of Public Affairs Education.24 (3).Routledge: 402.doi:10.1080/15236803.2018.1429819.ISSN 1523-6803.S2CID 158882673.
  40. ^Germano, William; Nicholls, Kit (2022).Syllabus: The Remarkable, Unremarkable Document That Changes Everything.Princeton University Press. p. 41.ISBN 978-0-691-19221-5.
  41. ^Caferro, William (2019).Teaching History (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley-Blackwell. p. 67.ISBN 978-1-119-14712-1.
  42. ^Kirtley, Susan E.; Garcia, Antero; Carlson, Peter E., eds. (2020).With Great Power Comes Great Pedagogy: Teaching, Learning, and Comics. Jackson:University Press of Mississippi. pp. 54–55.ISBN 978-1-4968-2603-9 – viaProject MUSE.
  43. ^Losh, Elizabeth (2017). "Rapid Response: DIY Curricula from FemTechNet to Crowd-Sourced Syllabi". In Ostherr, Kirsten (ed.).Applied Media Studies (1st ed.). New York:Routledge.doi:10.4324/9781315473857.ISBN 978-1-315-47385-7.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Open_Syllabus_Project&oldid=1314645916"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp