Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Online chat

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Real-time communication over the internet

In this typical online chat program, the window to the left shows a list of contacts, and the window to the right shows a conversation between the user and one of those contacts.
E-commerce
Digital content
Retail goods and services
Online shopping
Mobile commerce
Customer service
E-procurement
Purchase-to-pay
Super-apps

Online chat is any direct text-, audio- or video-based (webcams), one-on-one or one-to-many (group) chat (formally also known as synchronous conferencing), using tools such asinstant messengers,Internet Relay Chat (IRC),talkers and possiblyMUDs or otheronline games. Online chat includesweb-based applications that allow communication – often directly addressed, but anonymous between users in a multi-user environment.Web conferencing is a more specific online service, that is often sold as a service, hosted on a web server controlled by the vendor. Online chat may addresspoint-to-point communications as well asmulticast communications from one sender to multiple receivers and voice and video chat, or may be a feature of aweb conferencing service.

Online chat in a narrower sense is any kind ofcommunication over theInternet that offers areal-time transmission oftext messages from sender to receiver. Chat messages are generally short in order to enable other participants to respond quickly. Thereby, a feeling similar to aspoken conversation is created, which distinguishes chatting from other text-based online communication forms such asInternet forums andemail. The expressiononline chat comes from the wordchat which means "informal conversation".

Synchronous conferencing orsynchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) is any form ofcomputer-mediated communication that occurs in real-time; that is, there is no significant delay between sending and receiving messages.[1] SCMC includes real-time forms of text, audio, andvideo communication. SCMC has been highly studied in the context ofe-learning.[2]

History

The first chat system was used by the U.S. government in 1971. It was developed byMurray Turoff, a young PhD graduate fromBerkeley,[3] and its first use was during President Nixon's wage-price freeze underProject Delphi. The system was calledEMISARI and would allow 10 regional offices to link together in a real-time online chat known as the party line. It was in use up until 1986.

The first public online chat system was calledTalkomatic, created by Doug Brown and David R. Woolley in 1973 on thePLATO System at theUniversity of Illinois. It offered several channels, each of which could accommodate up to five people, with messages appearing on all users' screens character-by-character as they were typed. Talkomatic was popular among PLATO users into the mid-1980s. In 2014, Brown and Woolley released a web-based version of Talkomatic.[4]

The first online system to use the actual command "chat" was created for The Source in 1979 by Tom Walker and Fritz Thane of Dialcom, Inc.[5]

The first[6] dedicated online chat service that was widely available to the public was the CompuServeCB Simulator in 1980,[7] created byCompuServe executive Alexander "Sandy" Trevor inColumbus, Ohio. Chat rooms gained mainstream popularity withAOL.[when?][8][better source needed]

Other chat platforms flourished during the 1980s. Among the earliest with aGUI was BroadCast, aMacintosh extension that became especially popular onuniversity campuses in America and Germany.[9]

A conversation on IRC

Jarkko Oikarinen createdInternet Relay Chat (IRC) in 1988. Many peer-to-peer clients have chat rooms, e.g., Ares Galaxy,eMule,Filetopia,Retroshare,Vuze,WASTE,WinMX, etc. Many popular social media platforms are now used as chat rooms, such asWhatsApp,Facebook,Twitter,Discord,Snapchat,Instagram,TikTok, and many more.

The first transatlantic Internet chat took place betweenOulu, Finland andCorvallis, Oregon in February 1989.[10]

The first dedicated online chat service that was widely available to the public was the CompuServeCB Simulator in 1980,[11][12] created byCompuServe executive Alexander "Sandy" Trevor inColumbus, Ohio. Ancestors include network chat software such as UNIX"talk" used in the 1970s.[citation needed]

Chat is implemented in multiplevideo-conferencing tools. A study of chat use during work-related videoconferencing found that chat during meetings allows participants to communicate without interrupting the meeting, plan action around common resources, and enables greater inclusion.[13] The study also found that chat can cause distractions and information asymmetries between participants.

Types

According to the type of media used, synchronous conferencing can be divided into[2]

  • audio conferencing: only audio is used
  • video conferencing: Both audio (voice) and video and pictures are used.

According to the number of access point used, synchronous conferencing can be divided into

  • point-to-point: Only two computers are connected end to end.
  • multi-point: Two or more than two computers are connected.

Methods

Some of the methods used in synchronous conferencing are:

  • Chat (text only): Multiple participants can be logged into the conference and can interactively share resources and ideas. There is also an option to save the chat and archive it for later review.
  • Voice (telephone orvoice-over IP): This is a conference call between the instructor and the participating students where they can speak through a built-in microphone or a headset.
  • Video conferencing: This may or may not require the participants to have their webcams running. Usually, a video conference involves a live feed from a classroom or elsewhere or content.
  • Web conferencing: This includes Webinar (Web-based seminar) as well. Unlike in video conferencing, participants of web conferencing can access a wider variety of media elements. Web conferences are comparatively more interactive and usually incorporate chat sessions as well.
  • Virtual worlds: In this setup, students can meet in the virtual world and speak with each other through headsets and VoIP. This can make learning more productive and engaging when the students can navigate the worlds and operate in their avatar.[14]

Chat room

Look uponline chat in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
For other uses, seeChat room (disambiguation).
"Group chat" redirects here. For the Nickelodeon talk show, seeGroup Chat (talk show).
icon
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Online chat" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(January 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Screenshot of a group chat in theBriar communication client

The termschat room, orchatroom (and sometimesgroup chat; abbreviated asGC), are primarily used to describe any form of synchronous conferencing, occasionally evenasynchronous conferencing. The term can thus span technology ranging from real-time online chat and online interaction with strangers (e.g.,online forums) to fully immersivegraphical social environments. The primary use of a chat room is to share information via text with a group of other users.

Generally speaking, the ability to converse with multiple people in the same conversation differentiates chat rooms frominstant messaging programs, which are more typically designed for one-to-one communication. The users in a particular chat room are generally connected via a shared internet or other similar connection, and chat rooms exist catering for a wide range of subjects. New technology has enabled the use of file sharing and webcams.

Graphical multi-user environments

Visual chat rooms add graphics to the chat experience, in either 2D or 3D (employingvirtual reality technology). These are characterized by using a graphic representation of the user, anavatar virtual elements such as games (in particularmassively multiplayer online games) and educational material most often developed by individual site owners, who in general are simply more advanced users of the systems. The most popular environments, such asThe Palace, also allow users to create/build their own spaces. Some of the most popular 3D chat experiences areIMVU andSecond Life (though they extend far beyond just chat). Many such implementations generate profit by selling virtual goods to users at a high margin.

Some online chat rooms also incorporate audio andvideo communications, so that users may actually see and hear each other.

Games are also often played in chat rooms. These are typically implemented by an external process such as anIRC bot joining the room to conduct the game.Trivia question & answer games are most prevalent. A historic example isHunt the Wumpus.[15] Chatroom-based implementations of the party gameMafia also exist.[citation needed] A similar, but more complex style of text-based gaming areMUDs, in which players interact within a textual,interactive fiction–like environment.

Conferencing

Both synchronous andasynchronous conferencing areonline conferencing where the participants can interact while being physically located at different places in the world. Asynchronous conferencing allows the students to access the learning material at their convenience while synchronous conferencing requires that all participants including the instructor and the students be online at the time of the conference.[2]

While synchronous conferencing enables real-time interaction of the participants, asynchronous conferencing allows participants to post messages and others can respond to it at any convenient time. Sometimes a combination of both synchronous and asynchronous conferencing is used. Both methods give a permanent record of the conference.[16]

In education

Synchronous conferencing in education helps in the delivery of content through digital media. Since this is real-time teaching, it also brings the benefits of face-to-face teaching in distance learning.[17] Multiple higher education institutions offer well-designed quality e-learning opportunities.Some of the advantages of synchronous conferencing in education are:[18][19]

  • Helps the students to connect with not only their teachers and peers but also with recognized experts in the field regardless of the geographical distance and different time zones.
  • Provides opportunities for both the teachers and the students to expand their knowledge outside the classroom.
  • Helps students who are home-bound or limited mobility to connect with their classrooms and participate in learning.
  • Helps the faculties to conduct classes when they are not able to come to classes due to an emergency.
  • Supports real-time collaboration, interaction, and immediate feedback
  • Encourage students to learn together and in turn, develop cultural understanding
  • Personalized learning experience for the students
  • Real-time discussion opportunities for students promoting student engagement
  • Active interaction can lead to an associated community of like-minded students
  • Saves travel expenses and time

Implementation

There are four critical factors identified for implementing synchronous conferencing for effective instruction to the students[2]

  • Video and audio quality which depends on technical factors like higher bandwidth and processing capabilities of the system.
  • Training time depends on the familiarity and proficiency of the instructors and the students with the technology.
  • Teaching strategies depend on the adaptability of the instructors to the new methods, preparing appropriate and effective training materials, and motivating students.
  • Direct meeting of the instructor and the students.

The tools for implementing synchronous conferencing depend on the type of educational problem addressed. This is in turn decides the method of synchronous conferencing to be used and the tool to be used in the learning context. The tool selected addresses the problem of improving the learning outcomes which cannot be solved with an asynchronous environment. There are a number of tools and platforms available for synchronous conferencing.[18]

  • Smartphone applications
  • Web conferencing tools
  • Video conferencing tools
  • Video and hangout platforms
  • Shared whiteboards

The selection of tools and platforms also depends on the group size which depends on the activity for the course design.

Limitations

Some limitations for synchronous conferencing in learning are:[18][20]

  • Disjointed discussions, not connected in time
  • Lack of effective moderation and/or clear guidelines for learners
  • Difficulty in collaborating on online projects
  • Lack of proper communication with the instructor and students.
  • Technical issues may arise if not analysed and planned in advance
  • Lack of familiarity with the tools
  • Limited time to complete the learning activity and to incorporate interactions with the learners

Chatiquette

The termchatiquette (chat etiquette) is a variation ofnetiquette (Internet etiquette) and describes basic rules of online communication.[21][22][23] These conventions or guidelines have been created to avoid misunderstandings and to simplify the communication between users. Chatiquette varies from community to community and generally describes basiccourtesy. As an example, it is considered rude to write only in upper case, because it appears as if the user is shouting. The word "chatiquette" has been used in connection with various chat systems (e.g.Internet Relay Chat) since 1995.[24][25]

Chatrooms can produce a strong sense ofonline identity leading toimpression of subculture.[26]

Chats are valuable sources of various types of information, the automatic processing of which is the object of chat/text mining technologies.[27]

Social criticism

Criticism of online chatting andtext messaging include concern that they replace proper English withshorthand or with an almost completely new hybrid language.[28][29][30]

Writing is changing as it takes on some of the functions and features of speech. Internetchat rooms and rapid real-timeteleconferencing allow users to interact with whoever happens to coexist incyberspace. These virtual interactions involve us in 'talking' more freely and more widely than ever before.[31] With chatrooms replacing multiple face-to-face conversations, it is necessary to be able to have quick conversation as if the person were present, so some learn totype as quickly as they would normally speak. Some critics[who?] are wary that this casual form of speech is being used so much that it will slowly take over common grammar; however, such a change has yet to be seen.

With the increasing population of online chatrooms there has been a massive growth[32] of new words created orslang words, a number of them documented on the websiteUrban Dictionary.Sven Birkerts wrote:

"as new electronic modes of communication provoke similar anxieties amongst critics who express concern that young people are at risk, endangered by a rising tide of information over which the traditional controls of print media and the guardians of knowledge have no control on it".[33]

In Guy Merchant's journal article Teenagers in Cyberspace: An Investigation of Language Use and Language Change in Internet Chatrooms; Merchant says

"that teenagers and young people are in the leading the movement of change as they take advantage of the possibilities of digital technology, drastically changing the face of literacy in a variety of media through their uses of mobile phone text messages, e-mails, web-pages and on-line chatrooms. This new literacy develops skills that may well be important to the labor market but are currently viewed with suspicion in the media and by educationalists.[31]

Merchant also says "Younger people tend to be more adaptable than other sectors of society and, in general, quicker to adapt to new technology. To some extent they are the innovators, the forces of change in the new communication landscape."[31] In this article he is saying that young people are merely adapting to what they were given.

Protocols

The following are common chat programs and protocols:

Chat programs supporting multiple protocols:

Web sites with browser-based chat services:

See also

References

  1. ^Subramanian, Ramesh."CSDL | IEEE Computer Society".www.computer.org.
  2. ^abcdGrant, Michael M; Cheon, Jongpil."The Value of Using Synchronous Conferencing for Instruction and Students"(PDF).Journal of Interactive Online Learning. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 8 August 2017. Retrieved23 September 2015.
  3. ^Subramanian, Ramesh."CSDL | IEEE Computer Society".www.computer.org.
  4. ^"Wired and Inspired",The Columbus Dispatch (Business page), by Mike Pramik, 12 November 2000
  5. ^"This Week in History: Man caught on tracks is killed".
  6. ^"CompuServe Innovator Resigns After 25 Years".The Columbus Dispatch. 11 May 1996. p. 2F.
  7. ^"Wired and Inspired",The Columbus Dispatch (Business page), by Mike Pramik, 12 November 2000
  8. ^"This Week in History: Man caught on tracks is killed".
  9. ^"Interesting Idea !". alt.irc. 28 July 1991. Retrieved6 March 2015.
  10. ^"The 'Security Digest' Archives (TM) : TCP-IP Distribution List for February 1989".securitydigest.org.Archived from the original on 8 December 2017. Retrieved6 May 2018.
  11. ^"CompuServe Innovator Resigns After 25 Years",The Columbus Dispatch, 11 May 1996, p. 2F.
  12. ^Mike Pramik, "Wired and Inspired",The Columbus Dispatch, (Business page), 12 November 2000.
  13. ^Sarkar, Advait; Rintel, Sean; Borowiec, Damian; Bergmann, Rachel; Gillett, Sharon; Bragg, Danielle; Baym, Nancy; Sellen, Abigail (8 May 2021),"The promise and peril of parallel chat in video meetings for work",Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–8,doi:10.1145/3411763.3451793,ISBN 978-1-4503-8095-9,S2CID 233987188, retrieved1 November 2021{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  14. ^Gregory, Sue; Lee, Mark J. W.; Dalgarno, Barney; Tynan, Belinda, eds. (2016).Learning in virtual worlds: research and applications. Issues in distance education. Edmonton, Alberta: AU Press, Athabasca University.ISBN 978-1-77199-133-9.OCLC 930542375.
  15. ^"Interesting Idea !". alt.irc. 28 July 1991. Retrieved6 March 2015.
  16. ^"What is online conferencing?".Online Conferencing. Retrieved23 September 2015.
  17. ^Ericson Nolasco, Clyde (1 February 2022)."Online Distance Learning: The New Normal In Education".eLearning Industry. Retrieved30 May 2024.
  18. ^abcOzden, Sule."Student Perceptions of Web-conferencing in Hybrid Classes"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved25 September 2015.
  19. ^Ferriter, Bill."Using videoconferencing to connect your class to the world".Learn NC. Archived fromthe original on 25 September 2015. Retrieved25 September 2015.
  20. ^Anderson, Lynn; Fyvie, Barb; Koritko, Brenda (June 2006)."Best practices in synchronous conferencing moderation".The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.7 (1).doi:10.19173/irrodl.v7i1.308. Retrieved25 September 2015.
  21. ^"IRC Chatiquette – Chat Etiquette". Livinginternet.com. 28 November 1995.Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved19 January 2012.
  22. ^"BBC - WebWise - How do I use instant messaging (IM)?". Uits.uark.edu.Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved1 August 2017.
  23. ^Steven C. Mills (2007).Using the Internet for Active Teaching and Learning. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.ISBN 978-0-13-110546-1. Archived fromthe original on 19 October 2008.
  24. ^"Electronic Discourse - On Speech and Writing on the Internet - 3. Internet Relay Chat Discourse". Epubl.luth.se.Archived from the original on 4 March 2012. Retrieved19 January 2012.
  25. ^"CNET reviews - comparative reviews - chat clients - chatiquette". Archived fromthe original on 21 December 1996.
  26. ^Regina Lynn (4 May 2007)."Virtual Rape Is Traumatic, but Is It a Crime?".Wired. Archived fromthe original on 20 December 2014.
  27. ^"Texor". Yatsko's Computational Linguistics Laboratory. Archived fromthe original on 1 November 2014. Retrieved29 June 2013.
  28. ^Zimmer, Ben (18 September 2008)."Language Log: Shattering the illusions of texting".University of Pennsylvania. Archived fromthe original on 16 February 2013.
  29. ^Liberman, Mark (2 August 2012)."Language Log: Texting and language skills".University of Pennsylvania. Archived fromthe original on 15 January 2013.
  30. ^Zwicky, Arnold (19 September 2008)."Language Log: The decline of writing in Dingburg".University of Pennsylvania. Archived fromthe original on 16 February 2013.
  31. ^abcMerchant, Guy . "Teenagers in cyberspace: an investigation of language use and language change in internet chatrooms."Journal of Research in Reading. 2001, Vol. 24, Iss. 3, ISSN 0141-0423.
  32. ^Topping, Alexandra (10 June 2009)."'Web 2.0' declared millionth word in English language".The Guardian.Archived from the original on 24 October 2016.
  33. ^Birkerts, S. "Sense and semblance: The implications of virtuality." In B. Cox (Ed.),Literacy is not enough. Manchester University Press. 1998

External links

Culture
Technologies
Networks
Media coverage
People
Asynchronous conferencing
Synchronous conferencing
Publishing
History
Pioneers
Transmission
media
Network topology
and switching
Multiplexing
Concepts
Types of network
Notable networks
Locations
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Online_chat&oldid=1336555321"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp