For the form of Turkish spoken in what is now modern Turkey during the 11th-15th centuries, seeOld Anatolian Turkish. For the form used in the Ottoman Empire (14th to 20th centuries CE), seeOttoman Turkish.
This article shouldspecify the language of its non-English content, using{{langx}},{{transliteration}} for transliterated languages, and{{IPA}} for phonetic transcriptions, with an appropriateISO 639 code. Wikipedia'smultilingual support templates may also be used - notablyotk for Old Turkish.See why.(January 2025)
Old Turkic can generally be split into two dialects, the earlierOrkhon Turkic and the laterOld Uyghur. There is a difference of opinion among linguists with regard to theKarakhanid language, some (among whom includeOmeljan Pritsak,Sergey Malov,Osman Karatay andMarcel Erdal) classify it as another dialect of East Old Turkic, while others prefer to include Karakhanid among Middle Turkic languages;[2] nonetheless, Karakhanid is very close to Old Uyghur.[3] East Old Turkic and West Old Turkic together comprise the Old Turkic proper, though West Old Turkic is generally unattested and is mostly reconstructed through words loaned throughHungarian.[4] East Old Turkic is the oldest attested member of theSiberian Turkic branch of Turkic languages, and several of its now-archaic grammatical as well as lexical features are extant in the modernYellow Uyghur,Lop Nur Uyghur[5] andKhalaj (all of which are endangered); Khalaj, for instance, has (surprisingly) retained a considerable number of archaic Old Turkic words[6] despite forming alanguage island[7] within Central Iran and being heavily influenced byPersian.[8]Old Uyghur is not a direct ancestor of the modernUyghur language,[9][10] but rather theWestern Yugur language; the contemporaneous ancestor of Modern Uyghur was theChagatai literary language.[11]
Vowel roundness is assimilated through the word throughvowel harmony. Some vowels were considered to occur only in the initial syllable, but they were later found to be in suffixes.[12] Length is distinctive for all vowels; while most of its daughter languages have lost the distinction, many of these preserve it in the case of /e/ with a height distinction, where the long phoneme developed into a more closed vowel than the short counterpart.
Old Turkic is highly restrictive in which consonants words can begin with: words can begin with/b/,/t/,/tʃ/,/k/,/q/,/s/,/ɫ/ and/j/, but they do not usually begin with/p/,/d/,/g/,/ɢ/,/l/,/ɾ/,/n/,/ɲ/,/ŋ/,/m/,/ʃ/, or/z/. The only exceptions are𐰤𐰀 (ne, "what, which") and its derivatives, and some early assimilations of word-initial /b/ to /m/ preceding a nasal in a word such as𐰢𐰤 (men, "I").
TheOld Turkic script (also known variously as Göktürk script, Orkhon script, Orkhon-Yenisey script) is thealphabet used by theGöktürks and other earlyTurkickhanates during the 8th to 10th centuries to record the Old Turkic language.[13]
This writing system was later used within theUyghur Khaganate.[15] Additionally, aYenisei variant is known from 9th-centuryYenisei Kirghiz inscriptions, and it has likely cousins in theTalas Valley ofTurkestan and theOld Hungarian alphabet of the 10th century. Words were usually written from right to left. Variants of the script were found in Mongolia andXinjiang in the east and theBalkans in the west. The preserved inscriptions were dated between the 8th and 10th centuries.
There are approximately 12case morphemes in Old Turkic (treating 3 types ofaccusatives as one); the table below lists Old Turkic cases followingMarcel Erdal’s classification (some phonemes of suffixes written in capital letters denotearchiphonemes which sometimes are dropped or changed as per (East) Old Turkicphonotactics):
^This Old Turkic accusative suffix is retained inModern Turkish in the form of-jXg.[16]Karakhanid also employs this suffix.
^Khalaj is the only modern Turkic language to have retained this archaic case suffix, which fact has ledMahmud al-Kashgari to regard the suffix as a distinctive marker of Arghu language (i.e. Khalaj). Most of the remaining Turkic languages usually have-GA.[18]
^Old Turkic possessed an opposition between dative-ka and allative-gArU/-kArU cases, the latter perhaps derived secondarily from the former at the pre-Old Turkic stage. The dative case has been preserved intact in all the modern Siberian Turkic languages. On the other hand, the old allative has lost its case function, being preserved in a lexicalized manner in only a small number of adverbial expressions - for example,Uzbekichkari ‘towards inside’. However,Tuvan andKhakas have reintroduced the formal opposition into their respective case systems.
^Today this Old Turkic suffix is preserved as a case form inAltay andShor.
^Though Khalaj retains this suffix as a case form (like Altay and Shor), it denotes locative case; which, at first glance, is aberrant.[20]
^Out of all Turkic languages, today this case is preserved only inSakha (i.e. Yakut).
^InOrkhon Turkic. This ancient suffix is already rare by the time of Orkhon Turkic and the usage of this case with pronouns is not attested in the whole of Old Turkic.[21].
Old Turkic (like Modern Turkic) had 2 grammatical numbers: singular and plural. However, Old Turkic also formed collective nouns (a category related to plurals) by a separate suffix-(A)gU(n) e.g.tayagunuŋuz ‘your colts’.[22] Unlike Modern Turkic, Old Turkic had 3 types of suffixes to denote plural:[23]
-(X)t
-An
-lAr
Suffixes except for -lAr is limitedly used for only a few words. In some descriptions,-(X)t and-An may also be treated as collective markers.[24]-(X)t is used for titles of non-Turkic origin, e.g.tarxat ←tarxan 'free man' <Soghdian,tégit ←tégin 'prince' (of unknown origin).-s is a similar suffix, e.g.ïšbara-s 'lords' <Sanskritīśvara. -An is used for person, e.g.ärän 'men, warriors' ←är 'man',oglan ←ogul 'son'.
Today, all Modern Turkic languages (except forChuvash) use exclusively the suffix of the-lAr type for plural.
Finite verb forms in Old Turkic (i.e. verbs to which a tense suffix is added) always conjugate for person and number of the subject by corresponding suffixes save for the 3rd person, in which case person suffix is absent. This grammatical configuration is preserved in the majority of Modern Turkic languages, except for some such asYellow Uyghur in which verbs no longer agree with the person of the subject.
Old Turkic had a complex system of tenses,[25] which could be divided into six simple[26] and derived tenses, the latter formed by adding special (auxiliary) verbs to the simple tenses.
Old Turkic simple tenses according toM. Erdal's classification
Some suffixes are attested as being attached to only one word and no other instance of attachment is to be found. Similarly, some words are attested only once in the entire extant Old Turkic corpus.
L. Johanson,A History of Turkic, in: The Turkic Languages, eds. L. Johanson & E.A. Csato, Routledge, London (1998),ISBN0-415-08200-5
Talat Tekin,A Grammar of Orkhon Turkic, Uralic and Altaic Series Vol. 69, Indiana University Publications, Mouton and Co. (1968). (review:Gerard Clauson, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1969); Routledge Curzon (1997),ISBN0-7007-0869-3.
1These are traditional areas of settlement; the Turkic group has been living in the listed country/region for centuries and should not be confused with modern diasporas. 2State with limited international recognition.