Thenumerus clausus (lit. 'closed number') is a concept ofproperty law which limits the number of types of right that the courts will acknowledge as having the character of "property". Several consequences follow from a right having the nature of property, as opposed to being a personal right, like a contract or obligation to pay compensation. Historically, the law has given privileged remedies to the holders of property rights over personal claims. These have included priority in payment from an insolvent debtor, a greater likelihood of being awardedspecific performance, and security in remaining in possession of land or some other asset against termination of the right to possess. It holds especial importance inland law andcorporate law.[1][2]
Thenumerus clausus principle has its roots inRoman law.[3]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(December 2013) |
In theUnited Kingdom, and particularly in the jurisprudence of the English courts, it is well established that individuals cannot freely create new categories of property right themselves: it has to be recognised by courts. This was held to be true in the 19th century inKeppell v Bailey[4] andHill v Tupper[5] as a matter of public policy. In the 20th century, inNational Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth[6] with a more open approach,Lord Wilberforce stated that
Before a right or an interest can be admitted into the category of property, or of a right affecting property, it must be definable, identifiable by third parties, capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability.
A widely held view is that anumerus clausus, or a property right limit, serves to protect wealth in the scope where it already exists, and does not need extension.[7] This tends to be contested on the basis acknowledgement of property rights simply masks a privilege for people who have enoughbargaining power to exercise thefreedom of contract for the various privileges that property rights confer, such as priority in insolvency, security of tenure, a right to trace or follow an asset, and a greater likelihood of specific performance as a remedy.
Under English law today, there are fourteen property rights in thenumerus clausus, as follows.[8]
Before theLaw of Property Act 1925, thelife estate and theentail would have also counted as property rights, but they were abolished except as beneficial interests under a trust.
In German law, thenumerus clausus principle has a constitutional foundation[9][10] and limits property rights in their number (Typenzwang) and content (Typenfixierung).
Many other European states show equal doctrines.[11][12][failed verification][13]Exceptions include France and Spain.[14]
There are competing views about the desirability of having a limitednumerus clausus of property rights, as well as what counts as having a proprietary quality.[15][16]