Thenucleariids, ornucleariid amoebae, are a group ofamoebae that comprise thesister clade of thefungi. Together, they form the cladeHolomycota. They are aquatic organisms found infreshwater and marine habitats, as well as in faeces. They are free-livingphagotrophic predators that mostly consumealgae andbacteria.
Nucleariids are characterized by simple, spherical or flattened single-celled bodies with filopodia (fine, thread-likepseudopods), covered by a mucous coat. They lackflagella andmicrotubules. Inside thecytoplasm of some species areendosymbioticproteobacteria. Some species are naked, with only the mucous coat as cover, while others (known as 'scaled' nucleariids) have silica-based or exogenous particles of various shapes.
An exceptional nucleariid,Fonticula alba, developsmulticellular fruiting bodies (sorocarps) for spore dispersal. It is one of several cases of independently evolved multicellularity withinOpisthokonta, the clade that houses bothHolozoa (which includesanimals) and Holomycota.
Initially, nucleariids were grouped with other filose amoebae (i.e., with filopodia) based on their superficial similarity. Silica-scaled and naked nucleariids were classified into separatefamilies from one another,Pompholyxophryidae andNucleariidae, respectively. Due to its nature as aslime mold, the genusFonticula has also been classified separatedly, particularly withacrasids and other slime molds. With advancements inelectron microscopy andmolecular phylogenetics, the three groups were revealed to belong to the sameclade as sister to the fungi. Due to lack of molecular data, the three groups are treated as onefamily, under the name of Nucleariidae.
Various conflicting systems of above-family classification exist for nucleariids, with older systems grouping them as aclassCristidiscoidea composed of twoorders: one forFonticula and another for the remaining species.Mycologists regard them as an independentkingdom of life,Nucleariae, with twophyla that mirror those two orders. They are generally accepted byprotistologists as a single orderRotosphaerida, which is the oldest taxonomic name for these organisms.
Most nucleariids have some kind of mucous coat, with or without coverings. The coverings can be made withendogenoussilica-based particles (known as idiosomes) or withexogenous particles (known as xenosomes).[4] These particles are developed into hollow siliceous scales or spines.[12] The mucous coat itself—sometimes calledglycocalyx—is enigmatic, as it can be present or absent in the same organism depending on the conditions. It appears to be made of one or two layers fibrous material running parallel to the cell membrane, and it often houses bacterial ectosymbionts. Surrounding the cell periphery, the characteristic hyaline (i.e., transparent) filopodia are found, originating from any point of the cell surface, sometimes branching or tapering but are never stiff oranastomosing (fusing with one another). UnlikeHeliozoa, these filopodia are not supported by microtubules and do not contain extrusomes.[4]
Most species develop aresting cyst during theirlife cycle consisting of a smooth spherical cell covered by one or more thick layers of a translucent material.[4]
Nucleariids thrive in water bodies worldwide. Most live in a variety offreshwater environments, including hot spring waters of around 30 °C.[13] Others are found in marine environments (e.g.,Lithocolla), and others inhabit faeces (Fonticula).[4]
Nucleariids are free-livingphagotrophs, and preferably consumecyanobacteria and other algae.[9] Small-celled species like those ofParvularia andFonticula feed on smallbacteria, while larger cells such asNuclearia,Pompholyxophrys andLithocolla can also feed on detritus and unicellular eukaryoticalgae (e.g.,diatoms). All of them are slow-paced grazers[14] that probably grow in response to the availability of their food sources, such as afteralgal blooms.[4]
The nucleariidFonticula alba developing into sorocarps. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Nucleariids are among the closest relatives offungi,[15] together forming thecladeHolomycota.[16][17][7][4] This clade is, in turn, closely related toHolozoa, the clade containinganimals and their closestprotist relatives. Together, they form the cladeOpisthokonta. After animals and fungi, nucleariids include the third known occurrence ofmulticellularity among opisthokonts:[b] the speciesFonticula alba, a type ofslime mold, capable of aggregative multicellular fruiting that developssorocarps (stalks with masses of spores) fordispersal. The existence ofFonticula alba suggests that opisthokonts have a great propensity toward multicellularity.[16]
Nucleariids are unique within their greater evolutionary context.Apusomonads (relatives of opisthokonts), holozoans and fungi all evolved from ancestors that were single-celledphagotrophicflagellates. Opisthokonts, in particular, are characterized by a singleposteriorflagellum. Even the mostbasal-branching fungi (aphelids,rozellids andmicrosporidia)[c] are single-celled flagellates that prey on other eukaryotes.[18] The last common ancestor of nucleariids, however, had lost the opisthokont flagellum and its cell polarity, and had gained the characteristic mucous coat.[4] The presence offilopodia is more common among opisthokonts, shared with aphelids[18] and most holozoans.[20]
The history of the classification of nucleariids is full of incongruence betweenmorphology andmolecular phylogeny. Toward the end of the 19th century, most nucleariid species had already been described, and were classified with other naked or scaled filose amoebae.[21][4] During the second half of the 20th century, naturalist Heinrich Rainer described a subgroup ofheliozoans,Rotosphaeridia, to accommodate non-flagellated, scaled, filose amoebae withoutaxopodia (the nucleariidsPompholyxophrys,Pinaciophora,Lithocolla andRhabdiophrys).[2]
The genusFonticula was continually excluded, as it was considered anacrasid[8] or aslime mold,[24] until 1993, when protozoologistThomas Cavalier-Smith created the subclassCristidiscoidia to house two orders:Nucleariida (with Nucleariidae and Pompholyxophryidae) andFonticulida (with Fonticulidae).[6][4] However, he later considered scaled nucleariids (Pompholyxophryidae) as members of theCercozoa, completely separate from naked ones,[25] but this is no longer accepted.[11] In a 1999 taxonomic revision by Kirill A. Mikrjukov, Cristidiscoidida was regarded as ajunior synonym of Rotosphaerida, which finally united all discicristate filose amoebae. He also includedBelonocystis[26] andMicronuclearia in this order,[27] which now are known to belong toAmoebozoa andCRuMs, respectively.[4]
At present, different conflicting classifications for nucleariids remain in use depending on the authors. Cavalier-Smith maintained his system through the years, using the nameCristidiscoidea as a class of hisparaphyletic phylumChoanozoa, which included all protists most closely related toanimals andfungi.[28]Mycologists have proposed a separatekingdomNucleariae with lower ranks for Cavalier-Smith's two orders (phylaNuclearida andFonticulida, classesNuclearidea andFonticulidea), but without specifying their taxonomic composition.[7] Generally, protistologists prefer using the order Rotosphaerida instead, as it has priority over more recent names.[26][3][11] Most studies using the name Cristidiscoidea have only includedNuclearia or environmental sequences, while those using Rotosphaerida have been used when studying the scale-bearing amoebae and, more recently, the naked ones as well.[4]
At the family-level rank, although historically both Nucleariidae and Pompholyxophryidae have been used separately for naked and scale-bearing nucleariids respectively,[26] and Fonticulidae solely forFonticula,[6] protistologists tend to use only Nucleariidae now,[23][4] as there is no clear evolutionary separation between the three families.[11]
Of all nucleariids, only a few have been isolated andmolecularly analyzed.[11] Many genera remain asincertae sedis due to the lack of molecular data,[29] as it is difficult to confirm their evolutionary position other than by morphological similarity. The following is a list of nucleariid genera with definite placement:[23][4]
^The putative nucleariid genusVampyrellidium has cytoplasmic microtubules, but the remainingultrastructural traits have supported its placement among nucleariids.[4]
^abCann, J. P.; Page, F. C. (1979). "Nucleosphaerium tuckeri nov. gen. nov. sp. – a new freshwater filose amoeba without motile form in a new family Nucleariidae (Filosea: Aconchulinida) feeding by ingestion only".Archiv für Protistenkunde.122 (3–4):226–240.doi:10.1016/S0003-9365(79)80034-2.
^abcRainer, Heinrich (1968).Urtiere, Protozoa; Wurzelfüẞler, Rhizopoda; Sonnentierchen, Heliozoa: Systematik und Taxonomie, Biologie, Verbreitung und Ökologie der Arten der Erde [Protozoa; Rhizopods; Heliozoa: systematics and taxonomy, biology, distribution and ecology of the species of the Earth]. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile [The animal world of Germany and the adjacent sea areas] (in German). Vol. 56. Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag.OCLC5630582.
^abcAdl, Sina M.; Bass, David; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Schoch, Conrad L.; Smirnov, Alexey; Agatha, Sabine; Berney, Cedric; Brown, Matthew W.; Burki, Fabien; Cárdenas, Paco; Čepička, Ivan; Chistyakova, Lyudmila; Del Campo, Javier; Dunthorn, Micah; Edvardsen, Bente; Eglit, Yana; Guillou, Laure; Hampl, Vladimír; Heiss, Aaron A.; Hoppenrath, Mona; James, Timothy Y.; Karnkowska, Anna; Karpov, Sergey; Kim, Eunsoo; Kolisko, Martin; Kudryavtsev, Alexander; Lahr, Daniel J.G.; Lara, Enrique; Le Gall, Line (26 September 2018)."Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes".The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.66 (1):4–119.doi:10.1111/JEU.12691.PMC6492006.PMID30257078.
^abPage, Frederick C. (1987). "The classification of 'naked' amoebae (Phylum Rhizopoda)".Archiv für Protistenkunde.133 (3–4):199–217.doi:10.1016/S0003-9365(87)80053-2.
^abcWorley, Ann C.; Raper, Kenneth B.; Hohl, Marianne (1979). "Fonticula alba: a new cellular slime mold (Acrasiomycetes)".Mycologia.71 (4):746–760.doi:10.1080/00275514.1979.12021068.
^abZettler, Linda A. Amaral; Nerad, Thomas A.; O'Kelly, Charles J.; Sogin, Mitchell L. (11 July 2005). "The nucleariid amoebae: more protists at the animal-fungal boundary".Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.48 (3):293–297.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2001.tb00317.x.PMID11411837.S2CID44548329.
^Patterson DJ (May 1985). "On the Organization and Affinities of the Amoeba,Pompholyxophrys punicea Archer, Based on Ultrastructural Examination of Individual Cells from Wild Material 1".J. Protozool.32 (2):241–6.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1985.tb03044.x.
^Yoshida M, Nakayama T, Inouye I (January 2009). "Nuclearia thermophila sp. nov. (Nucleariidae), a new nucleariid species isolated from Yunoko Lake in Nikko (Japan)".European Journal of Protistology.45 (2):147–155.doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2008.09.004.PMID19157810.
^abcGalindo, Luis Javier; Torruella, Guifré; López-García, Purificación; Ciobanu, Maria; Gutiérrez-Preciado, Ana; Karpov, Sergey A; Moreira, David (2023). "Phylogenomics Supports the Monophyly of Aphelids and Fungi and Identifies New Molecular Synapomorphies".Systematic Biology.72 (3):505–515.doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac054.PMID35900180.
^Cann, John P. (August 1986). "The feeding behavior and structure ofNuclearia delicatula".Journal of Protozoology.33 (3):392–396.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1986.tb05629.x.
^Mikrjukov, Kirill A.; Mylnikov, Alexander P. (2001). "A study of the fine structure and the mitosis of a lamellicristate amoeba,Micronuclearia podoventralis gen. et sp. nov. (Nucleariidae, Rotosphaerida)".European Journal of Protistology.37 (1):15–24.doi:10.1078/0932-4739-00783.
^Adl, Sina M.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Bass, David; Bowser, Samuel S.; Brown, Matthew W.; Burki, Fabien; Dunthorn, Micah; Hampl, Vladimir; Heiss, Aaron; Hoppenrath, Mona; Lara, Enrique; le Gall, Line; Lynn, Denis H.; McManus, Hilary; Mitchell, Edward A. D.; Mozley-Stanridge, Sharon E.; Parfrey, Laura W.; Pawlowski, Jan; Rueckert, Sonja; Shadwick, Laura; Schoch, Conrad L.; Smirnov, Alexey; Spiegel, Frederick W. (28 September 2012)."The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes".The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.59 (2):429–514.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x.PMC3483872.PMID23020233.
^Takahashi, Yuki; Yoshida, Masaki; Inouye, Isao; Watanabe, Makoto M. (October 2016). "Fibrophrys columna gen. nov., sp. nov: a member of the family Amphifilidae".European Journal of Protistology.56:41–50.doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2016.06.003.PMID27468745.
^Nicholls, Kenneth H. (17 September 2012). "New and little-known marine species ofPinaciophora,Rabdiaster andThomseniophora gen. nov. (Rotosphaerida: Pompholyxophryidae)".Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.93 (5):1211–1229.doi:10.1017/S002531541200135X.