 | |
| Registered | 18,245,970[1] |
|---|---|
| Turnout | 72.36% ( 12.77pp)[1] |
Elections were held inCalifornia on November 6, 2012. On the ballot were elevenpropositions, variousparties' nominees for theUnited States presidency, theClass I Senator to theUnited States Senate, all of California's seats to theHouse of Representatives, all of the seats of theState Assembly, and all odd-numbered seats of theState Senate.
This was the first general election with California's newly implementednonpartisan blanket primary in effect, pursuant toProposition 14, which passed with 53% voter approval in June 2010. Additionally, in November 2010, voters approvedProposition 20, which authorized a CaliforniaCitizens Redistricting Commission to re-drawcongressional district lines, in addition to its current job of drawingstate senate district lines andstate assembly district lines, taking away that job from theCalifornia state legislature. This was the first general election whose winners represent districts drawn by the Citizens Redistricting Commission.
After the election, California's congressional delegation gained four new Democrats, including the first gayAsian American elected to Congress.Dianne Feinstein won her re-election bid for the U.S. Senate, and the Democrats gained a 2/3supermajority in both of the state'slegislative chambers. California voters also voted to re-elect incumbent presidentBarack Obama, giving him the state's fifty-fiveelectoral votes. Among the propositions on the ballot, voters chose to increases taxes in order to fund education and other state programs, voted to keep thedeath penalty and the power oflabor unions to use payroll deduction to fund political campaigns, and opted to reform the state'sthree-strikes law.
11 propositions have been qualified for the ballot.[2]
This is aninitiative constitutional amendment that would increase income tax on incomes over $250,000 for seven years and raise the statewide sales tax by 0.25% for four years, and allocates the additional incomes to education, as well as certain state services transferred from the state to local governments. If this measure and Proposition 38 both pass, then the measure with more "Yes" votes will take effect.
This is aninitiative constitutional amendment that would make several changes to the state budget process. It would change California's budget from an annual budget to a biennial budget, require the legislature to show how bills that increase state spending over $25 million would be offset, give the governor power to reduce spending if there is no budget for more than 45 days, require performance reviews of state and local programs, and allow local governments more power over how they administer programs funded by state taxes. It also requires bills to be published at least three days before they are voted on.
Proposition 32 is aninitiativestatute. It would prohibit unions from using payroll-deducted funds for political purposes (the same restriction applying to payroll deductions, if any, by corporations and government contractors). In addition, it would permit voluntary employee contributions to an employee-sponsored committee or union with yearly written authorization, ban contributions to candidates and candidate-controlled committees by corporations and labor unions, and ban contractors who receive government contracts (including public-sector labor unions with collective bargaining agreements) from donating to office holders involved in awarding the contract or committees controlled by said officers.[3]
Similar to the failedProposition 17 on the June, 2010 ballot. This is aninitiativestatute that would allow auto insurance companies to charge based on continuity (length) of the buyer's insurance coverage.
Proposition 34 is aninitiativestatute that would end thedeath penalty in California.
The proposition was eventually defeated with 53% of the vote against it, despite the fact that supporters had spent 6 times more money in the campaign than opponents.[4]
This is aninitiativestatute that would expand the definition of human trafficking and increase the penalties for participating in the activity. It would also require convicted human traffickers to register as sex offenders, protect victims during court proceedings and require "human trafficking training" for police officers. In addition, the statute would require registered sex offenders to declare their "Internet identifiers" to the general public. Proposition 35 passed with 81% of the vote.[5]
TheACLU andElectronic Frontier Foundation challenged Proposition 35's internet disclosure requirements as an unconstitutional violation of theFirst Amendment.[6] In January 2013, U.S. District JudgeThelton Henderson found the challengers were likely to succeed and issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of Proposition 35.[7][8] U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals JudgeJay Bybee affirmed the order blocking Proposition 35, finding the Proposition was unconstitutional even underintermediate scrutiny.[9] California Attorney GeneralKamala Harris declined to appeal and has announced she will not enforce Proposition 35 until it is rewritten so as to be constitutional.[10]
This is aninitiativestatute that would modify California'sthree-strikes law to reduce life sentences for felons if the third offense was non-serious and non-violent.
California Proposition 37 is aninitiated state statute that would require labeling of genetically engineered food, with some exceptions. It would also disallow the practice of labeling genetically engineered food with the word "natural".
This is aninitiativestatute that would raise income taxes on all incomes over $7,316 for a period of twelve years, directing the revenues to education and state debt payments for the first four years, and then to education for the last eight years. If both this measure and Proposition 30 pass, then the measure with more "Yes" votes would take effect.
Proposition 39 is aninitiativestatute that would change the way California businesses determine their state tax liabilities, and earmark up to $550 million of the anticipated additional revenue to alternative energy projects.
This is aveto referendum to nullify the CaliforniaCitizens Redistricting Commission's district maps for theCalifornia State Senate.
This is a legislatively referredstatute that would authorize an $11.1 billion bond to upgrade California's water system. On August 9, 2010, the California Legislature postponed the vote on the proposition until 2012. This measure was again delayed to the November 2014 general election.
