Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Norwegian heavy water sabotage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sabotage operations with the aim of halting the creation process of Nazi nuclear weapons

Norwegian Heavy Water Sabotage
Part ofWorld War II

Vemork hydroelectric power plant,c. 1947
Date1940 – 1944
Location
Telemark, Norway
ResultAllied victory

TheNorwegian heavy water sabotage (Bokmål:Tungtvannsaksjonen;Nynorsk:Tungtvassaksjonen) was a series of Allied-led efforts to halt Germanheavy water (deuterium) production via hydroelectric plants inNazi Germany-occupied Norway duringWorld War II, involving both Norwegian commandos and Allied bombing raids. During the war, theAllies sought to inhibit theGerman development of nuclear weapons with the removal of heavy water and the destruction of heavy-water production plants. The Norwegian heavy water sabotage was aimed at the 60 MWVemork power station at theRjukan waterfall inTelemark.

The hydroelectric power plant at Vemork was built in 1934. It was the world's first site to mass-produce heavy water (as a byproduct ofnitrogen fixing), with a capacity of 1.2 tonnes per year. Before theGerman invasion of Norway on 9 April 1940, the FrenchDeuxième Bureau removed 185 kilograms (408 lb) of heavy water from the Vemork plant in then-neutral Norway. The plant's managing director agreed to lend France the heavy water for the duration of the war. The French transported it secretly toOslo, then toPerth, Scotland, and then to France. The plant was still capable of producing heavy water, however,[1] and the Allies were concerned that the Germans would use the facility to produce more.

Between 1940 and 1944, a series of sabotage actions by theNorwegian resistance movement and Allied bombing ensured the destruction of the plant and the loss of its heavy water. These operations — code-namedGrouse, Freshman, andGunnerside — knocked the plant out of production in early 1943. InOperation Grouse, the BritishSpecial Operations Executive (SOE) successfully placed an advance team of four Norwegians on theHardanger Plateau above the plant in October 1942. The unsuccessfulOperation Freshman was mounted the following month by British paratroopers, who were to rendezvous with the Operation Grouse Norwegians and proceed to Vemork. This attempt failed when the military gliders (and one of theirtugs, aHandley Page Halifax) crashed short of their destination. Except for the crew of one Halifax bomber, all the participants were killed in the crashes or captured, interrogated and executed by theGestapo.

In February 1943, a team of Norwegian commandos ofSOE'sNorwegian Independent Company 1 (Kompani Linge) destroyed the production facility inOperation Gunnerside; this was followed by Allied bombing raids. The Germans ceased operations, and attempted to move the remaining heavy water to Germany. Norwegian resistance forces then sank the ferry carrying the heavy water, theSF Hydro, onLake Tinn.

Background

[edit]
Table top with various pieces of the experimental equipment
Experimental apparatus with which chemistsOtto Hahn andFritz Strassmann discovered thenuclear fission ofuranium in 1938
See also:German nuclear weapons program

Enrico Fermi and his colleagues studied the results of bombardinguranium with neutrons in 1934.[2] That year,Ida Noddack first mentioned the concept ofnuclear fission.[3] In December 1938, four years after the Fermi publication,Lise Meitner andOtto Robert Frisch correctly interpretedOtto Hahn andFritz Strassmann's radiochemical experimental results as evidence of nuclear fission.

News of the discovery spread quickly among physicists and it was realized that if chain reactions could be controlled, fission might be a new source of great power. What was needed was a substance which couldmoderate the energy of the secondary neutrons emitted by fission, so they could be captured by otherfissile nuclei.Heavy water andgraphite were the prime candidates for moderating neutron energy.[4]

WhenNazi Germany investigated the production of anatomic bomb, a range of options was identified. Although historical records provide limited detail on the German decision to pursue the heavy water approach, it became clear after the war that they had explored that option.[5][6] Although ultimately unsuccessful, the approach chosen has been demonstrated as technically viable.Plutonium-239 (239Pu) makes effective weapons material, although it requires an implosion-type mechanism rather than the simpler gun-type trigger used in theThin Man uranium bomb. Heavy water has been demonstrated as an effective moderator for239Pu production, and may be separated from ordinary water byelectrolysis. The German program had already been handicapped by the Nazi purging of GermanJewishphysicists and theconscription of others and ended in the autumn of 1942.

Approaches to developing a weapon

[edit]

In nuclear-weapon development, the main problem is securing sufficient weapons-grade material; it is particularly difficult to acquire fissileisotopes ofuranium-235 (235U) or239Pu. Weapons-grade uranium requires mining, extracting andenriching natural ore. Plutonium can be "bred" inreactors fueled by unenriched uranium, which requires chemical separation of the239Pu produced.

Plutonium production

[edit]

Although the most commonisotope of uranium,uranium-238 (238U), can be used as secondaryfissile material inhydrogen (fusion) bombs, it cannot be used as the primary fissile material for an atomic (fission-only) bomb.238U can be used to produce239Pu through the fission of235U, which produces neutrons (some of which will be absorbed by238U, creating239U). The239U will decay after a few days, turning into weapons-usable239Pu.

The Germans found that achain reaction could not be sustained ifgraphite was used as a moderator, and abandoned it. Unaware that this was due to impurities, they did not test ultra-pure graphite (which would have been suitable). Instead, they settled on a heavy-water-based reactor design.[7] A heavy-water-moderated nuclear reactor could be used for nuclear-fission research and, ultimately, to breed the plutonium with which a bomb could be made.

Deuterium ("heavy water") production

[edit]
A sealed glass capsule of heavy water, with two detailed photos of its label
Heavy water made byNorsk Hydro

In normal water, there is only one deuterium atom for every 6,400 hydrogen atoms;deuterium is more prevalent in the residue of water used as anelectrolyte. An analysis of residues from theVemork hydroelectric plant, a large-scale nitrate production plant using theHaber process, showed a hydrogen-to-deuterium ratio of 48 (most of the deuterium bound inHDO molecules).[8]Norwegian Institute of Technology lecturerLeif Tronstad andJomar Brun, head of the hydrogen plant, proposed a project in 1933 (the year heavy water was first isolated). It was accepted by Norsk Hydro, and production began in 1935.

The technology is straightforward. Heavy water (D2O) is separated from normal water by electrolysis, because the difference in mass between the two hydrogen isotopes translates into a slight difference in the speed at which the reaction proceeds. To produce pure heavy water by electrolysis requires a large cascade of electrolysis chambers, and consumes large amounts of electric power. Since excess power was available, heavy water could be purified from the existing electrolyte. Norsk Hydro became the heavy-water supplier for the world's scientific community, as a by-product of fertilizer production for which the ammonia was used.[9]Hans Suess, a German adviser on the production of heavy water, had assessed the Vemork plant as incapable of producing militarily-useful quantities of heavy water in less than five years at its capacity at the time.[1]

Operations to limit German access to heavy water

[edit]

Pre-invasion efforts

[edit]

French research considered the production of239Pu using reactors moderated by heavy water and graphite. Preliminary French research indicated that the graphite then available commercially was not pure enough to serve the purpose, and heavy water would be required. The German research community had reached a similar conclusion, and had procured additional heavy water from Vemork in January 1940. The German firmIG Farben, a partial owner of Norsk Hydro, had ordered 100 kg (220 lb) per month; Norsk Hydro's maximum production rate was then limited to 10 kg (22 lb) per month.[1]

TheDeuxième Bureau (French military intelligence) directed three French agents (Captain Muller and Lieutenants Mossé and Knall-Demars) to remove the world's extant supply, 185 kg (408 lb), of heavy water from the Vemork plant in then-neutral Norway in 1940. Norsk Hydro general directorAxel Aubert agreed to lend the heavy water to France for the duration of the war, noting that if Germany won the war he would probably be shot. Transportation was difficult, since theAbwehr (German military intelligence) was present in Norway and had been alerted of ongoing French activities in Norway (although they were not specifically warned about heavy water). If they had become aware of the shipment, they might have tried to intercept it. The French transported it secretly toOslo, then toPerth, Scotland, and finally to France.[1]

When France was invaded, French nuclear scientistFrédéric Joliot-Curie took charge of the material and hid it in a Banque de France vault and then in a prison. Joliot-Curie moved it toBordeaux, where it, research papers and most of the scientists (Joliot-Curie remained in France) boarded the Britishtramp steamerBroompark (one of the many merchant ships involved in saving over 200,000 troops and civilians in the three weeks after theDunkirk evacuation).[10]

The ship already had industrial diamonds, machinery and British evacuees aboard. TheBroompark delivered its passengers and cargo, including the global stockpile of heavy water, toFalmouth, Cornwall on 21 June. The award of an OBE to Captain Paulsen was recorded inThe London Gazette of 4 February 1941. Crucial to the success of the mission was the role played byCharles Howard, 20th Earl of Suffolk, the British liaison to the French scientific establishment.

Although the supply of heavy water had been removed, the plant was capable of producing more. The Norsk Hydro management's collaboration with the Germans was examined during investigations ofcollaborationism begun by Norwegian authorities after the war, but Aubert's cooperation with the French aided the company's case.[1][11]

Operations Grouse and Freshman

[edit]

In October 1942,Combined Operations Headquarters began operations to destroy the Vemork plant. There were two operations; the first (Operation Grouse) would drop a number of Norwegians in the area as an advance force. When they were in place, a party of British engineers would be landed bymilitary glider to attack the plant itself (Operation Freshman).[12][13]

On 18 October 1942, a four-man team of Norwegian commandos of SOE's Kompani Linge parachuted into Norway. Since they had to ski a long distance to the plant from their drop point in the wilderness, considerable time was allotted for Operation Grouse. Unlike previous failed plans, Grouse required the team to memorize blueprints.[12]

The British were suspicious, because the Norwegian Grouse team were delayed in contacting SOE team; the Norwegians had been dropped at the wrong place, however, and had gone off course several times. The secret question was, "What did you see in the early morning of (a day)?" The Grouse team replied, "Three pink elephants." The British were ecstatic at the success of Grouse, and the next phase of the operations began.[12][13]

On 19 November 1942, Operation Freshman followed with a planned glider-borne landing on the frozen lakeMøsvatn near the plant. TwoAirspeed Horsa gliders, towed byHandley Page Halifax bombers (each glider carrying two pilots and 15Royal Engineers of the 9th Field Company,1st British Airborne Division), took off fromRAF Skitten nearWick, Caithness,Scotland. The towing of gliders, always hazardous, was worse in this case because of the long flight distance to Norway and poor visibility.

One of the Halifax tugs crashed into a mountain, killing all seven aboard; its glider cast off but crashed nearby, resulting in several casualties. Although the other Halifax arrived at the vicinity of the landing zone, the zone could not be precisely identified because the link between theEureka (ground) and Rebecca (aircraft) radar beacons failed.

After many tries and with fuel running low, the Halifax pilot decided to abort the operation and return to base. Shortly afterward, the tug and glider experienced heavy turbulence and the tow rope broke. The glider crash-landed near the crash site of the other glider, killing and injuring several more people. The Norwegians were unable to reach the crash sites in time; the survivors were captured by theGestapo, who tortured and later had them executed underAdolf Hitler'sCommando Order.[12][13]

The unsuccessful raid alerted the Germans to Allied interest in their heavy-water production.[12] The surviving Norwegian Grouse team had a long wait in their mountain hideaway, subsisting onmoss andlichen until they captured areindeer just before Christmas.[12]

Operation Gunnerside

[edit]
Two saboteurs and a facility employee shown adjacent to the electrolysis chambers
Reconstruction of the Operation Gunnerside team planting explosives to destroy the cascade of electrolysis chambers

British authorities, aware that the Grouse team was still operational, decided to mount another operation with them; by this time, the Grouse team was known as Swallow. On the night of 16 February 1943, in Operation Gunnerside (named after the village ofGunnerside, where SOE headCharles Jocelyn Hambro and his family used to shoot grouse), an additional six Norwegian commandos were dropped by parachute by a 138 SquadronHalifax bomber fromRAF Tempsford.[14] They landed successfully, and found the Swallow team after a few days of searching on cross-country skis. The combined team made final preparations for their assault, scheduled for the night of 27–28 February 1943.[15]

Supplies required by the commandos were dropped with them in specialCLE containers. One container was buried in the snow by a Norwegian patriot to hide it from the Germans; he later recovered it, and gave it to an officer of the BritishArmy Air Corps (which was conducting exercises in the area) in August 1976. The container was brought back to England and displayed at theAirborne Museum at Aldershot, which became part of theImperial War Museum Duxford.[16]

After the failed Freshman attempt, the Germans placed mines, floodlights, and additional guards surrounding the plant. Although the mines and lights remained in place, security at the plant had weakened over the winter. The 75 m (246 ft) bridge spanning the deep ravine 200 m (660 ft) above the riverMåna, however, was fully guarded.[12]

The force decided to descend into the ravine, travel across the icy river and climb the steep hill on the far side. The winter river level was very low, and on the far side (where the ground leveled) they followed a single railway track straight into the plant without encountering any guards. Even before Grouse landed in Norway, SOE had a Norwegian agent in the plant who supplied detailed plans and schedules. The demolition party used this information to enter the main basement by a cable tunnel and through a window. The only person they encountered in the plant was a Norwegian caretaker named Johansen, who was very willing to cooperate with them.[12]

The saboteurs then placed explosive charges on the heavy-water electrolysis chambers, and attached a fuse which allowed sufficient time for their escape. In an attempt to prevent reprisals, aThompson submachine gun[17][18][19] was purposely left behind to indicate that this was the work of British forces and not the local resistance. When the fuses were about to be lit, the caretaker was worried about his glasses (which were somewhere in the room; during the war, new eyeglasses were nearly impossible to obtain). A frantic search ensued; the glasses were found, showing a bit of care from the Norwegian group, and the fuses lit. The explosive charges detonated, destroying the electrolysis chambers.[12]

The raid was considered successful. The entire inventory of heavy water produced during the German occupation, over 500 kg (1,102 lb), was destroyed with equipment critical to the operation of the electrolysis chambers. Although 3,000 German soldiers were dispatched to search the area for the commandos, all escaped; five commandos escaped byskiing 322 km (200 mi) to Sweden,[20] two proceeded to Oslo (where they assistedMilorg), and four remained in the region for further resistance work.[15]

Resumed operation and Allied air raids

[edit]

The attack halted production for several months, although it did not permanently damage the Vemork plant. The plant was repaired by April; SOE concluded that a repeat commando raid would be extremely difficult, since German security was considerably improved.[21]

Almost as soon as production resumed, theUSAAF began a series of raids on Vemork. The plant was attacked in November by a massive daylight bombing raid of 143B-17heavy bombers, which dropped 711 bombs. Although the raid caused extensive damage, at least 600 bombs missed the plant.

On 16 and 18 November, 35B-24 heavy bombers from the392nd Bomber Group (based atWendling, Station 118) extensively attacked the hydro-electric power station atRjukan. The missions, the bomber group's longest, lasted9+12 and10+12 hours respectively.[22]There was less need for ground assaults than a year earlier, since night bombing (previously unrealistic due to German air cover) was now an alternative. The Germans, convinced that air raids would result in further serious damage, decided to abandon the plant and move its remaining stocks and critical components to Germany in 1944.[23]

Sinking of the SFHydro

[edit]
Historic photo of the ferry preparing to cross Lake Tinn
The SFHydro atMæl in 1925

Knut Haukelid (the only trained commando in the immediate area) was informed of the German plan to remove the heavy water, and was advised to muster support and destroy the shipment. Haukelid recruited two people, and they decided to sabotage a ferry which would be carrying the heavy water acrossLake Tinn on theTinnsjø railway ferry. One of his recruits recognized a ferry-crew member and spoke with him, taking an opportunity to slip into the bottom of the ship, plant the bomb and slip away. Eight-and-a-half kilograms ofplastic explosives (with two alarm-clock fuses) were fixed to the keel of theSF Hydro, which would transport railway cars with drums of the heavy water across Lake Tinn.

The ferry and its cargo sank in deep water shortly after its departure around midnight on 20 February 1944. Witnesses reported seeing steel drums floating after the ferry sank, leading to speculation that they did not really contain heavy water; an examination of records after the war showed that some barrels were only half-full, however, and would have floated. A few may have been salvaged and transported to Germany.[21]

Despite the mission's intention to minimize casualties, 18 people were killed; 29 survived. The dead were 14 Norwegian crew and passengers and four German soldiers.[24]

A 2005 expedition retrieved a barrel, numbered "26", from the bottom of the lake.[25] Its heavy-water contents matched the concentration noted in German records, confirming that the shipment was not a decoy. The concentration of heavy water in some of the barrels was too small to be of value to a weapons program, however, which might explain the lack of tight security around the shipment and why the ferry was not searched for bombs.[26]

Historical perspective

[edit]
Buildings on a hillside
The plant in 2008

Recent investigation of production records at Norsk Hydro and analysis of an intact barrel which was salvaged in 2004 indicated that although the barrels in this shipment containedpH 14 water (suggestive of the alkaline electrolytic-refinement process), they did not contain high concentrations ofD2O.[27] Despite the apparent shipment size, the total quantity of pure heavy water was limited; most barrels contained only 0.5–1.0 percent heavy water, confirming the success of Operation Gunnerside in destroying higher-purity heavy water.

The Germans would have needed a total of about 5 t (5.5short tons) of heavy water to operate a nuclear reactor, and the manifest indicated that there was only 500 kg (0.55 short tons) of heavy water being transported to Germany. TheHydro was carrying too little heavy water to supply one reactor, let alone the 10 or more tons of heavy water needed to make enough plutonium for a nuclear weapon.[27]

The historical consensus about theGerman nuclear weapons program is that it was a long way from producing a bomb,[28] even if the Norwegian heavy water had been produced and shipped at the maximum rate. However, the unsuccessfulOperation Freshman and the efforts of the saboteurs in Swallow, Grouse and Gunnerside made the secret war on heavy-water production internationally known.

Agents

[edit]

Joachim Rønneberg, the last surviving member of the Gunnerside team, died on 21 October 2018 at age 99. A statue of him, along with a plaque commemorating Operation Gunnerside, stands near the harbour in his hometown ofÅlesund.[29]The New York Times reported that at 95, Rønneberg was "still mentally sharp ... and possessed of the unflappable calm that so impressed British military commanders more than 70 years ago."[30]Einar Skinnarland was the first agent inside.[clarification needed]

Grouse-Swallow team
Jens-Anton Poulsson
Arne Kjelstrup
Knut Haugland
Claus Helberg
Gunnerside team
Joachim Rønneberg
Knut Haukelid
Fredrik Kayser
Kasper Idland
Hans Storhaug
Birger Strømsheim
Leif Tronstad
Lake Tinn team
Knut Haukelid
Knut Lier-Hansen
Rolf Sørlie
Einar Skinnarland
Gunnar Syverstad
Kjell Nielsen
"Larsen"

Histories

[edit]
King Haakon VII shaking hands with a uniformed Jens Anton Poulsson, surrounded by other officers
Première ofOperation Swallow: The Battle for Heavy Water (Kampen om tungtvannet) on 5 February 1948(from left)Knut Haukelid,Joachim Rønneberg,Jens-Anton Poulsson (shaking hands withKing Haakon VII), andKasper Idland

After interviewing Nielsen and Helberg,Barbara Wace of theAssociated Press filed a news article on the sabotage in May 1945. Wartime censorship delayed publication until after theatomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.[31]But For These Men (ISBN 0705700453), a 1962 book by John D. Drummond, recounts two dramatic raids: on the Norsk Hydro heavy-water factory at Vemork and another therailway ferryHydro.The Real Heroes of Telemark: The True Story of the Secret Mission to Stop Hitler's Atomic Bomb, a 2003 book byRay Mears (ISBN 0-340-83016-6), emphasises the Norwegian commandos' unique survival skills. The book is a companion volume toThe Real Heroes of Telemark, aBBC television documentary series.

Skis Against the Atom (ISBN 0-942323-07-6) is a first-hand account byKnut Haukelid, one of the Gunnerside raiders who remained behind. Jens-Anton Poulsson (Swallow and Grouse) wroteThe Heavy Water Raid: The Race for the Atom Bomb 1942–1944 (ISBN 9788245808698), a 2009 book. Operation Freshman is covered in two books: Richard Wiggan's 1986Operation Freshman: The Rjukan Heavy Water Raid 1942 (ISBN 9780718305710) and Jostein Berglyd's 2007Operation Freshman: The Actions and the Aftermath (ISBN 9789197589598).

Richard Rhodes'sPulitzer Prize-winning book,The Making of the Atomic Bomb, includes details of the events.[32]Leo Marks' 1998 book,Between Silk and Cyanide: A Codemaker's Story 1941–1945 (ISBN 0-684-86780-X), also details the story. Marks (SOE's cryptographer) knew the Norwegian team, trained them incryptography so they could communicate with SOE in England, and followed their progress after they were dropped in Norway. The raid is the subject ofAssault in Norway: Sabotaging the Nazi Nuclear Program (ISBN 9781585747504), a 2002 book by Thomas Gallagher based on interviews with many of the commandos.

An account of Operation Gunnerside is part of Neal Bascomb's 2016The Winter Fortress: The Epic Mission to Sabotage Hitler's Atomic Bomb (ISBN 9780544368057).Damien Lewis's bookHunting Hitler's Nukes: The Secret Race to Stop the Nazi Bomb (ISBN 9781786482082), also published that year, details the raid and the sinking of the SFHydro. The 2018 book,Heroes of Telemark; Sabotaging Hitler's atomic bomb, Norway 1942–44 by David Greentree (ISBN 9781472827678), describes the operation's planning, execution and aftermath.

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^abcdeDahl, Per F (1999).Heavy water and the wartime race for nuclear energy. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing. pp. 103–108.ISBN 07-5030-6335. Retrieved12 July 2009.
  2. ^E. Fermi, E. Amaldi, O. D'Agostino, F. Rasetti, and E. Segrè (1934) "Radioacttività provocata da bombardamento di neutroni III,"La Ricerca Scientifica, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 452–453.
  3. ^Ida Noddack (1934) "Über das Element 93,"Zeitschrift für Angewandte Chemie, vol. 47, no. 37, pp. 653–655.
  4. ^, Weintraub, Bob.Lise Meitner (1878–1968): Protactinium, Fission, and Meitnerium. Retrieved on 8 June 2009.
  5. ^Bernstein, Jeremy (2007).Plutonium: A History of the World's Most Dangerous Element. Joseph Henry Press.ISBN 978-0-309-10296-4. Retrieved12 July 2007.
  6. ^Powers, Thomas (1993).Heisenberg's War: the secret history of the German bomb. Alfred A. Knopf.ISBN 0-394-51411-4.
  7. ^The heavy-water concept was viable; consider the heavy-water-moderated production reactors atSavannah River Site's R-Reactor, P-Reactor, L-Reactor, K-Reactor, and C-Reactor, orMayak's production reactors, to see proof that heavy water is effective for plutonium production if available in sufficient quantities.
  8. ^Per F. Dahl (1999).Heavy water and the wartime race for nuclear energy. p. 43.ISBN 0-585-25449-4.
  9. ^"Vemork Heavy Water Plant – 1942–44". GlobalSecurity.org.Archived from the original on 6 August 2009. Retrieved15 July 2009.
  10. ^Ebb and Flow, Evacuations and Landings by Merchant Ships in World War Two, Roy MartinISBN 0955744121
  11. ^Andersen, Ketil Gjølme G. (2009)."Axel Aubert – utdypning".Store Norske leksikon (in Norwegian). Oslo: Kunnskapsforlaget.Archived from the original on 19 September 2012. Retrieved7 July 2009.
  12. ^abcdefghiGallagher, Thomas (2002).Assault In Norway: Sabotaging the Nazi Nuclear Program. Guilford, Connecticut: The Lyons Press.ISBN 1-58574-750-5. Retrieved12 July 2009.
  13. ^abcBerglyd, Jostein; Translated by Tim Dinan (2008).Operation Freshman: The Hunt for Hitler's Heavy Water. Solna: Leandoer and Eckholm.ISBN 978-91-975895-9-8. Retrieved12 July 2009.
  14. ^"WESTERN EUROPE 1939-1945: RESISTANCE & SOE (HS 2/185)".The National Archives. Retrieved17 February 2021.
  15. ^abRiste, Olav; Nøkleby, Berit (1970).Norway 1940–45: The Resistance Movement. Oslo: Tano.ISBN 82-518-0164-8.
  16. ^"Airborne Forces Museum in Aldershot".Airborne Assault ParaData.Archived from the original on 4 February 2017. Retrieved3 February 2017.
  17. ^The Saboteurs of Telemark, BBC (1973)
  18. ^Crowdy, Terry (2008)SOE Agent:Churchill's Secret Warriors. pg 42
  19. ^Bailey, Roderick (2008)Forgotten Voices of the Secret War: An Inside History of Special Operations in the Second World War, pg 140–141
  20. ^Skis against the atom Book by Knut Haukelid, Page 127, Author states that the Gunnerside party took 14 days to get to Sweden and covered over 200 miles of enemy-occupied territory
  21. ^abRhodes, Richard (1995).The making of the atomic bomb. Simon & Schuster.ISBN 9780684813783. Retrieved12 July 2009.
  22. ^http://www.b24.netArchived 16 February 2008 at theWayback Machine Official website of the 392nd Bomb Group
  23. ^Haukelid, Knut (1989).Skis against the atom. Minot, North Dakota: North American Heritage Press.ISBN 0-942323-07-6.
  24. ^British Embassy in Oslo (25 February 2014)."Sinking of DF Hydro 70th anniversary events in Norway".www.gov.uk. Retrieved13 January 2016.
  25. ^"Heroes of Telemark accompany heavy water barrel to USA". Norsk Hydro ASA. 23 November 2006. Archived fromthe original on 19 August 2008. Retrieved15 July 2009.)
  26. ^"NOVA: Hitler's Sunken Secret". The Corporation for Public Broadcasting – WGBH Educational Foundation. 1996–2005.Archived from the original on 12 July 2009. Retrieved12 July 2009.
  27. ^abNOVA (8 November 2005)."Hitler's Sunken Secret (transcript)". NOVA Web site.Archived from the original on 17 September 2008. Retrieved8 October 2008.
  28. ^"Nazis and the Bomb".PBS. 8 November 2005.Archived from the original on 24 September 2017. Retrieved6 September 2017.
  29. ^"Joachim Ronneberg: Norwegian who thwarted Nazi nuclear plan dies".BBC News. 22 October 2018.
  30. ^Higgins, Andrew (20 November 2015)."WWII Hero Credits Luck and Chance in Foiling Hitler's Nuclear Ambitions".The New York Times. Retrieved4 February 2016.
  31. ^Wace, Barbara (6 May 1945)."Attacks by Allied Commandos Wrecked Nazi Atom Machines".Edmonton Journal (published 7 August 1945). Associated Press. Retrieved30 August 2020.
  32. ^Rhodes, Richard (1986).The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. pp. 455–457,512–517.ISBN 9781439126226.Archived from the original on 9 September 2015.

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage&oldid=1317448837"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp