 | This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(June 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Normative mineralogy is a calculation of the composition of a rock sample that estimates theidealised mineralogy of a rock based on a quantitativechemical analysis according to the principles ofgeochemistry.
Normative mineral calculations can be achieved via either the CIPWNorm or the Barth-Niggli Norm (also known as the Cation Norm).
Normative calculations are used to produce an idealised mineralogy of a crystallized melt. First, a rock is chemically analysed to determine theelemental constituents. Results of the chemical analysis traditionally are expressed as oxides (e.g., weight percent Mg is expressed as weight percent MgO). The normative mineralogy of the rock then is calculated, based upon assumptions about the order of mineral formation and known phase relationships of rocks and minerals, and using simplified mineral formulas. The calculated mineralogy can be used to assess concepts such assilicasaturation of melts.
Because the normative calculation is essentially a computation, it can be achieved via computer programs.
The CIPW Norm was developed in the early 1900s and named after its creators, the petrologistsCharlesCross,JosephIddings,LouisPirsson, and the geochemistHenryWashington. The CIPW normative mineralogy calculation is based on the typical minerals that may be precipitated from ananhydrousmelt at low pressure, and simplifies the typical igneous geochemistry seen in nature with the following four constraints:
This is an artificial set of constraints, and therefore the results of the CIPW norm do not reflect the true course of igneous differentiation in nature.
The primary benefit of calculating a CIPW norm is determining what the ideal mineralogy of anaphanitic orporphyritic igneous rock is. Secondly, the degree ofsilica saturation of the melt that formed the rock can be assessed in the absence of diagnosticfeldspathoid species.
The silica saturation of a rock varies not only with silica content but the proportion of the various alkalis and metal species within the melt. The silica saturationeutectic plane is thus different for various families of rocks and cannot be easily estimated, hence the requirement to calculate whether the rock is silica saturated or not.
This is achieved by assigning cations of the major elements within the rock to silica anions in modal proportion, to formsolid solution minerals in the idealised mineral assemblage starting with phosphorus forapatite, chlorine and sodium forhalite, sulfur and FeO intopyrite, FeO and Cr2O3 is allocated forchromite, FeO and equal molar amount of TiO2 forilmenite, CaO and CO2 forcalcite, to complete the most common non-silicate minerals. From the remaining chemical constituents, Al2O3 and K2O are allocated with silica fororthoclase; sodium, aluminium and potassium foralbite, and so on until either there is no silica left (in which case feldspathoids are calculated) or excess, in which case the rock contains normative quartz.
Normative mineralogy is anestimate of the mineralogy of the rock. It usually differs from the visually observable mineralogy, at least as much as the types of mineral species, especially amongst the ferromagnesian minerals and feldspars, where it is possible to have many solid solution series of minerals, or minerals with similar Fe and Mg ratios substituting, especially with water (e.g.; amphibole and biotite replacing pyroxene).
However, in aphanites, or rocks withphenocrysts clearly out of equilibrium with thegroundmass, a normative mineral calculation is often the best to understand the evolution of the rock and its relationship to other igneous rocks in the region.
The CIPW Norm or Cation Norm is a useful tool for assessing silica saturation or oversaturation; estimations of minerals in a mathematical model are based on many assumptions and the results must be balanced with the observable mineralogy. The following areas create the most errors in calculations;
For this reason it is not advised to utilise a CIPW norm onkimberlites,lamproites,lamprophyres and some silica-undersaturated igneous rocks. In the case ofcarbonatite, it is improper to use a CIPW norm upon a melt rich in carbonate.
It is possible to apply the CIPW norm to metamorphosed igneous rocks. The validity of the method holds as true for metamorphosed igneous rocks as any igneous rock, and in this case it is useful in deriving an assumed mineralogy from a rock that may have no remnantprotolith mineralogy remaining.