Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Nonlinear Schrödinger equation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nonlinear form of the Schrödinger equation
Absolute value of thecomplexenvelope of exact analyticalbreather solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation innondimensional form. (A) The Akhmediev breather; (B) thePeregrine breather; (C) the Kuznetsov–Ma breather.[1]

Intheoretical physics, the (one-dimensional)nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) is anonlinear variation of theSchrödinger equation. It is aclassical field equation whose principal applications are to the propagation of light in nonlinearoptical fibers, planarwaveguides[2] and hot rubidium vapors[3]and toBose–Einstein condensates confined to highlyanisotropic, cigar-shapedtraps, in themean-field regime.[4] Additionally, the equation appears in the studies of small-amplitudegravity waves on the surface of deepinviscid (zero-viscosity) water;[2] theLangmuir waves in hotplasmas;[2] the propagation of plane-diffracted wave beams in the focusing regions of the ionosphere;[5] the propagation ofDavydov's alpha-helix solitons, which are responsible for energy transport along molecular chains;[6] and many others. More generally, the NLSE appears as one of universal equations that describe the evolution of slowly varying packetsof quasi-monochromatic waves in weakly nonlinear media that havedispersion.[2] Unlike the linearSchrödinger equation, the NLSE never describes the time evolution of a quantum state.[citation needed] The 1D NLSE is an example of anintegrable model.

Inquantum mechanics, the 1D NLSE is a special case of the classical nonlinearSchrödinger field, which in turn is a classical limit of a quantum Schrödinger field. Conversely, when the classical Schrödinger field iscanonically quantized, it becomes a quantum field theory (which is linear, despite the fact that it is called ″quantumnonlinear Schrödinger equation″) that describes bosonic point particles with delta-function interactions—the particles either repel or attract when they are at the same point. In fact, when the number of particles is finite, this quantum field theory is equivalent to theLieb–Liniger model. Both the quantum and the classical 1D nonlinear Schrödinger equations are integrable. Of special interest is the limit of infinite strength repulsion, in which case the Lieb–Liniger model becomes theTonks–Girardeau gas (also called the hard-core Bose gas, or impenetrable Bose gas). In this limit, the bosons may, by a change of variables that is a continuum generalization of theJordan–Wigner transformation, be transformed to a system one-dimensional noninteracting spinless[7] fermions.[8]

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation is a simplified 1+1-dimensional form of theGinzburg–Landau equation introduced in 1950 in their work on superconductivity, and was written down explicitly by R. Y. Chiao, E. Garmire, and C. H. Townes (1964, equation (5)) in their study of optical beams.

Multi-dimensional version replaces the second spatial derivative by the Laplacian. In more than one dimension, the equation is not integrable, it allows for a collapse and wave turbulence.[9]

Definition

[edit]

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation is anonlinear partial differential equation, applicable toclassical andquantum mechanics.

Classical equation

[edit]

The classical field equation (indimensionless form) is:[10]

Nonlinear Schrödinger equation(Classical field theory)

itψ=12x2ψ+κ|ψ|2ψ{\displaystyle i\partial _{t}\psi =-{1 \over 2}\partial _{x}^{2}\psi +\kappa |\psi |^{2}\psi }

for thecomplex fieldψ(x,t).

This equation arises from theHamiltonian[10]

H=dx[12|xψ|2+κ2|ψ|4]{\displaystyle H=\int \mathrm {d} x\left[{1 \over 2}|\partial _{x}\psi |^{2}+{\kappa \over 2}|\psi |^{4}\right]}

with thePoisson brackets

{ψ(x),ψ(y)}={ψ(x),ψ(y)}=0{\displaystyle \{\psi (x),\psi (y)\}=\{\psi ^{*}(x),\psi ^{*}(y)\}=0\,}
{ψ(x),ψ(y)}=iδ(xy).{\displaystyle \{\psi ^{*}(x),\psi (y)\}=i\delta (x-y).\,}

Unlike its linear counterpart, it never describes the time evolution of a quantum state.[citation needed]

The case with negative κ is called focusing and allows forbright soliton solutions (localized in space, and having spatial attenuation towards infinity) as well asbreather solutions. It can besolved exactly by use of theinverse scattering transform, as shown byZakharov & Shabat (1972) (seebelow). The other case, with κ positive, is the defocusing NLS which hasdark soliton solutions (having constant amplitude at infinity, and a local spatial dip in amplitude).[11]

Quantum mechanics

[edit]

To get thequantized version, simply replace the Poisson brackets by commutators

[ψ(x),ψ(y)]=[ψ(x),ψ(y)]=0[ψ(x),ψ(y)]=δ(xy){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{}[\psi (x),\psi (y)]&=[\psi ^{*}(x),\psi ^{*}(y)]=0\\{}[\psi ^{*}(x),\psi (y)]&=-\delta (x-y)\end{aligned}}}

andnormal order the Hamiltonian

H=dx[12xψxψ+κ2ψψψψ].{\displaystyle H=\int dx\left[{1 \over 2}\partial _{x}\psi ^{\dagger }\partial _{x}\psi +{\kappa \over 2}\psi ^{\dagger }\psi ^{\dagger }\psi \psi \right].}

The quantum version was solved byBethe ansatz byLieb and Liniger. Thermodynamics was described byChen-Ning Yang. Quantum correlation functions also were evaluated by Korepin in 1993.[8] The model has higher conservation laws - Davies and Korepin in 1989 expressed them in terms of local fields.[12]

Solution

[edit]

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation is integrable in 1d: Zakharov and Shabat (1972) solved it with theinverse scattering transform. The corresponding linear system of equations is known as theZakharov–Shabat system:

ϕx=JϕΛ+Uϕϕt=2JϕΛ2+2UϕΛ+(JU2JUx)ϕ,{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\phi _{x}&=J\phi \Lambda +U\phi \\\phi _{t}&=2J\phi \Lambda ^{2}+2U\phi \Lambda +\left(JU^{2}-JU_{x}\right)\phi ,\end{aligned}}}

where

Λ=(λ100λ2),J=iσz=(i00i),U=i(0qr0).{\displaystyle \Lambda ={\begin{pmatrix}\lambda _{1}&0\\0&\lambda _{2}\end{pmatrix}},\quad J=i\sigma _{z}={\begin{pmatrix}i&0\\0&-i\end{pmatrix}},\quad U=i{\begin{pmatrix}0&q\\r&0\end{pmatrix}}.}

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation arises as compatibility condition of the Zakharov–Shabat system:

ϕxt=ϕtxUt=JUxx+2JU2U{iqt=qxx+2qrqirt=rxx2qrr.{\displaystyle \phi _{xt}=\phi _{tx}\quad \Rightarrow \quad U_{t}=-JU_{xx}+2JU^{2}U\quad \Leftrightarrow \quad {\begin{cases}iq_{t}=q_{xx}+2qrq\\ir_{t}=-r_{xx}-2qrr.\end{cases}}}

By settingq =r* orq = −r* the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with attractive or repulsive interaction is obtained.

An alternative approach uses the Zakharov–Shabat system directly and employs the followingDarboux transformation:

ϕϕ[1]=ϕΛσϕUU[1]=U+[J,σ]σ=φΩφ1{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\phi \to \phi [1]&=\phi \Lambda -\sigma \phi \\U\to U[1]&=U+[J,\sigma ]\\\sigma &=\varphi \Omega \varphi ^{-1}\end{aligned}}}

which leaves the system invariant.

Here,φ is another invertible matrix solution (different fromϕ) of the Zakharov–Shabat system with spectral parameter Ω:

φx=JφΩ+Uφφt=2JφΩ2+2UφΩ+(JU2JUx)φ.{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\varphi _{x}&=J\varphi \Omega +U\varphi \\\varphi _{t}&=2J\varphi \Omega ^{2}+2U\varphi \Omega +\left(JU^{2}-JU_{x}\right)\varphi .\end{aligned}}}


Starting from the trivial solution U = 0 and iterating, one obtains the solutions with nsolitons. This can be achieved via direct numerical simulation using, for example, thesplit-step method.[13]This method has been implemented on both CPU and GPU.[14][15]

Applications

[edit]

Fiber optics

[edit]

Inoptics, the nonlinear Schrödinger equation occurs in theManakov system, a model of wave propagation in fiber optics. The function ψ represents a wave and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation describes the propagation of the wave through a nonlinear medium. The second-order derivative represents the dispersion, while theκ term represents the nonlinearity. The equation models many nonlinearity effects in a fiber, including but not limited toself-phase modulation,four-wave mixing,second-harmonic generation,stimulated Raman scattering,optical solitons,ultrashort pulses, etc.

Water waves

[edit]
Ahyperbolic secant (sech) envelope soliton for surface waves on deep water.
Blue line: water waves.
Red line: envelope soliton.

Forwater waves, the nonlinear Schrödinger equation describes the evolution of theenvelope ofmodulated wave groups. In a paper in 1968,Vladimir E. Zakharov describes theHamiltonian structure of water waves. In the same paper Zakharov shows that, for slowly modulated wave groups, the waveamplitude satisfies the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, approximately.[16] The value of the nonlinearity parameterк depends on the relative water depth. For deep water, with the water depth large compared to thewave length of the water waves,к is negative andenvelopesolitons may occur. Additionally, the group velocity of these envelope solitons could be increased by an acceleration induced by an external time-dependent water flow.[17]

For shallow water, with wavelengths longer than 4.6 times the water depth, the nonlinearity parameterк is positive andwave groups withenvelope solitons do not exist. In shallow watersurface-elevation solitons orwaves of translation do exist, but they are not governed by the nonlinear Schrödinger equation.

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation is thought to be important for explaining the formation ofrogue waves.[18]

Thecomplex fieldψ, as appearing in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, is related to the amplitude and phase of the water waves. Consider a slowly modulatedcarrier wave with water surfaceelevationη of the form:

η=a(x0,t0)cos[k0x0ω0t0θ(x0,t0)],{\displaystyle \eta =a(x_{0},t_{0})\;\cos \left[k_{0}\,x_{0}-\omega _{0}\,t_{0}-\theta (x_{0},t_{0})\right],}

wherea(x0,t0) andθ(x0,t0) are the slowly modulated amplitude andphase. Furtherω0 andk0 are the (constant)angular frequency andwavenumber of the carrier waves, which have to satisfy thedispersion relationω0 = Ω(k0). Then

ψ=aexp(iθ).{\displaystyle \psi =a\;\exp \left(i\theta \right).}

So itsmodulus |ψ| is the wave amplitudea, and itsargument arg(ψ) is the phaseθ.

The relation between the physical coordinates (x0,t0) and the (x, t) coordinates, as used in thenonlinear Schrödinger equation given above, is given by:

x=k0[x0Ω(k0)t0],t=k02[Ω(k0)]t0{\displaystyle x=k_{0}\left[x_{0}-\Omega '(k_{0})\;t_{0}\right],\quad t=k_{0}^{2}\left[-\Omega ''(k_{0})\right]\;t_{0}}

Thus (x, t) is a transformed coordinate system moving with thegroup velocity Ω'(k0) of the carrier waves,The dispersion-relationcurvature Ω"(k0) – representinggroup velocity dispersion – is always negative for water waves under the action of gravity, for any water depth.

For waves on the water surface of deep water, the coefficients of importance for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation are:

κ=2k02,Ω(k0)=gk0=ω0{\displaystyle \kappa =-2k_{0}^{2},\quad \Omega (k_{0})={\sqrt {gk_{0}}}=\omega _{0}\,\!}  so Ω(k0)=12ω0k0,Ω(k0)=14ω0k02,{\displaystyle \Omega '(k_{0})={\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {\omega _{0}}{k_{0}}},\quad \Omega ''(k_{0})=-{\frac {1}{4}}{\frac {\omega _{0}}{k_{0}^{2}}},\,\!}

whereg is theacceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface.

In the original (x0,t0) coordinates the nonlinear Schrödinger equation for water waves reads:[19]

it0A+iΩ(k0)x0A+12Ω(k0)x0x0Aν|A|2A=0,{\displaystyle i\,\partial _{t_{0}}A+i\,\Omega '(k_{0})\,\partial _{x_{0}}A+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\Omega ''(k_{0})\,\partial _{x_{0}x_{0}}A-\nu \,|A|^{2}\,A=0,}

withA=ψ{\displaystyle A=\psi ^{*}} (i.e. thecomplex conjugate ofψ{\displaystyle \psi }) andν=κk02Ω(k0).{\displaystyle \nu =\kappa \,k_{0}^{2}\,\Omega ''(k_{0}).} Soν=12ω0k02{\displaystyle \nu ={\tfrac {1}{2}}\omega _{0}k_{0}^{2}} for deep water waves.

Vortices

[edit]

Hasimoto (1972) showed that the work ofda Rios (1906) onvortex filaments is closely related to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Subsequently,Salman (2013) used this correspondence to show thatbreather solutions can also arise for a vortex filament.

Galilean invariance

[edit]

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation isGalilean invariant in the following sense:

Given a solutionψ(x, t) a new solution can be obtained by replacingx withx +vt everywhere in ψ(x, t) and by appending a phase factor ofeiv(x+vt/2){\displaystyle e^{-iv(x+vt/2)}\,}:

ψ(x,t)ψ[v](x,t)=ψ(x+vt,t)eiv(x+vt/2).{\displaystyle \psi (x,t)\mapsto \psi _{[v]}(x,t)=\psi (x+vt,t)\;e^{-iv(x+vt/2)}.}

Gauge equivalent counterpart

[edit]

NLSE (1) is gauge equivalent to the following isotropicLandau–Lifshitz equation (LLE) orHeisenberg ferromagnet equation

St=SSxx.{\displaystyle {\vec {S}}_{t}={\vec {S}}\wedge {\vec {S}}_{xx}.\qquad }

Note that this equation admits several integrable and non-integrable generalizations in 2 + 1 dimensions like theIshimori equation and so on.

Zero-curvature formulation

[edit]

The NLSE is equivalent to thecurvature of a particularsu(2){\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su}}(2)}-connection onR2{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}} being equal to zero.[20]

Explicitly, with coordinates(x,t){\displaystyle (x,t)} onR2{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}}, the connection componentsAμ{\displaystyle A_{\mu }} are given byAx=(iλiφiφiλ){\displaystyle A_{x}={\begin{pmatrix}i\lambda &i\varphi ^{*}\\i\varphi &-i\lambda \end{pmatrix}}}At=(2iλ2i|φ|22iλφ+φx2iλφφx2iλ2+i|φ|2){\displaystyle A_{t}={\begin{pmatrix}2i\lambda ^{2}-i|\varphi |^{2}&2i\lambda \varphi ^{*}+\varphi _{x}^{*}\\2i\lambda \varphi -\varphi _{x}&-2i\lambda ^{2}+i|\varphi |^{2}\end{pmatrix}}}where theσi{\displaystyle \sigma _{i}} are thePauli matrices.Then the zero-curvature equationtAxxAt+[Ax,At]=0{\displaystyle \partial _{t}A_{x}-\partial _{x}A_{t}+[A_{x},A_{t}]=0}

is equivalent to the NLSEiφt+φxx+2|φ|2φ=0{\displaystyle i\varphi _{t}+\varphi _{xx}+2|\varphi |^{2}\varphi =0}. The zero-curvature equation is so named as it corresponds to the curvature being equal to zero if it is definedFμν=[μAμ,νAν]{\displaystyle F_{\mu \nu }=[\partial _{\mu }-A_{\mu },\partial _{\nu }-A_{\nu }]}.

The pair of matricesAx{\displaystyle A_{x}} andAt{\displaystyle A_{t}} are also known as aLax pair for the NLSE, in the sense that the zero-curvature equation recovers the PDE rather than them satisfying Lax's equation.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Figure 1 from:Onorato, M.; Proment, D.;Clauss, G.; Klein, M. (2013), "Rogue Waves: From Nonlinear Schrödinger Breather Solutions to Sea-Keeping Test",PLOS ONE,8 (2) e54629,Bibcode:2013PLoSO...854629O,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054629,PMC 3566097,PMID 23405086
  2. ^abcdMalomed, Boris (2005), "Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations", in Scott, Alwyn (ed.),Encyclopedia of Nonlinear Science, New York: Routledge, pp. 639–643
  3. ^Fontaine, Q.; Bienaimé, T.; Pigeon, S.; Giacobino, E.; Bramati, A.; Glorieux, Q. (2018), "Observation of the Bogoliubov Dispersion in a Fluid of Light",Phys. Rev. Lett.,121 (18) 183604,arXiv:1807.10242,Bibcode:2018PhRvL.121r3604F,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.183604,PMID 30444401
  4. ^Pitaevskii, L.; Stringari, S. (2003),Bose-Einstein Condensation, Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon,ISBN 0-19-850719-4
  5. ^Gurevich, A. V. (1978),Nonlinear Phenomena in the Ionosphere, Berlin: Springer,ISBN 0-387-08605-6
  6. ^Balakrishnan, R. (1985). "Soliton propagation in nonuniform media".Physical Review A.32 (2):1144–1149.Bibcode:1985PhRvA..32.1144B.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.32.1144.PMID 9896172.
  7. ^A possible source of confusion here is thespin–statistics theorem, which demands that fermions have half-integer spin; however, it is a theorem of relativistic 3+1-dimensional quantum field theories, and thus is not applicable in this 1D, nonrelativistic case.
  8. ^abKorepin, V. E.; Bogoliubov, N. M.; Izergin, A. G. (1993).Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-58646-7.
  9. ^G. Falkovich (2011).Fluid Mechanics (A short course for physicists). Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-1-107-00575-4.
  10. ^abV.E. Zakharov; S.V. Manakov (1974). "On the complete integrability of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation".Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics.19 (3):551–559.Bibcode:1974TMP....19..551Z.doi:10.1007/BF01035568.S2CID 121253212. Originally in:Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika19(3): 332–343. June 1974.
  11. ^Ablowitz, M.J. (2011),Nonlinear dispersive waves. Asymptotic analysis and solitons, Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–156,ISBN 978-1-107-01254-7
  12. ^"Archived copy"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2012-05-16. Retrieved2011-09-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  13. ^Ablowitz, Mark J. (2023). "Nonlinear waves and the Inverse Scattering Transform".Optik.278 170710.Bibcode:2023Optik.27870710A.doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170710.
  14. ^"NLSE Documentation". Retrieved2025-04-06.
  15. ^Aladjidi, Tangui; Piekarski, Clara; Glorieux, Quentin (2024)."NLSE: A Python package to solve the nonlinear Schrödinger equation".Journal of Open Source Software.9 (99): 6607.Bibcode:2024JOSS....9.6607A.doi:10.21105/joss.06607.
  16. ^V. E. Zakharov (1968). "Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid".Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics.9 (2):190–194.Bibcode:1968JAMTP...9..190Z.doi:10.1007/BF00913182.S2CID 55755251. Originally in:Zhurnal Prikdadnoi Mekhaniki i Tekhnicheskoi Fiziki 9 (2): 86–94, 1968.]
  17. ^G. G. Rozenman, A. Arie, L. Shemer (2019). "Observation of accelerating solitary wavepackets".Phys. Rev. E.101 (5) 050201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.050201.PMID 32575227.S2CID 219506298.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. ^Dysthe, K.; Krogstad, H.E.; Müller, P. (2008). "Oceanic rogue waves".Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.40 (1):287–310.Bibcode:2008AnRFM..40..287D.doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102203.
  19. ^Whitham, G.B. (1974).Linear and nonlinear waves. Wiley-Interscience. pp. 601–606 & 489–491.ISBN 0-471-94090-9.
  20. ^Dunajski, Maciej (2010).Solitons, instantons, and twistors. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 49.ISBN 978-0-19-857063-9.

Other

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nonlinear_Schrödinger_equation&oldid=1321372741"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp