Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Nichiren

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Japanese Buddhist monk and philosopher (1222–1282)
This article is about the Japanese Buddhist priest. For the book, seeNichiren (book). For the film, seeNichiren (film).

Nichiren
日蓮
Nichiren Daishonin Hakii Portrait
Portrait from Kuon-ji Temple in Mount Minobu, Yamanashi prefecture, 15th century
Personal life
Born(1222-04-06)6 April 1222
Kominato village,Awa province,Japan
Died13 October 1282(1282-10-13) (aged 60)
Ikegami Daibo Hongyoji Temple,Musashi province, Japan
NationalityJapanese[1]
EducationKiyozumi-dera Temple (Seichō-ji), Enryaku-ji Temple on Mount Hiei
Other names
  • Dai-Nichiren (大日蓮;
    Nichiren the Great)
    [2][3]
  • Nichiren Daishōnin (日蓮大聖人;
    Great Sage Nichiren)
    [4][5]
  • Nichiren Shōnin (日蓮聖人;
    The Sage Nichiren)
    [6]: 610 
  • Nichiren Dai-Bosatsu (日蓮大菩薩;
    Nichiren Great Bodhisattva)
Religious life
ReligionBuddhism
DenominationNichiren Buddhism
School
Lineage
Senior posting
TeacherDōzenbo of Seichō-ji Temple[8]: 442 

Nichiren (日蓮;Japanese pronunciation:[ɲi.tɕiꜜ.ɾeɴ,ɲiꜜ.tɕi.ɾeɴ],[9] 6 April 1222 – 13 October 1282) was aJapanese Buddhist monk and philosopher of theKamakura period. His teachings form the basis ofNichiren Buddhism, a unique branch of JapaneseMahayana Buddhism based on theLotus Sutra.

Nichiren[10]: 77 [11]: 1  declared that theLotus Sutra alone contains the highest truth of Buddhism and that it is the only sutra suited for theAge of Dharma Decline. He insisted that thesovereign of Japan and its people should support only this form of Buddhism and eradicate all others, or they would face social collapse and environmental disasters.[12] Nichiren advocated the faithful recitation of the title of theLotus Sutra,Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō, as the only effective path toBuddhahood in this very life, a path which he saw as accessible to all people regardless of class, education or ability. Nichiren held thatShakyamuni and all otherBuddhist deities were manifestations of theOriginal Eternal Buddha (本仏Honbutsu) of theLotus Sutra, which he equated with theLotus Sutra itself and its title. He also declared that believers of theLotus Sutra must propagate it even though this would lead to many difficulties and even persecution, which Nichiren understood as a way of "reading" theLotus Sutra with one's very body. Nichiren believed that the spread of theLotus Sutra teachings would lead to the creation of aPure Land on earth.[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]

Nichiren was a prolific writer and his biography, temperament, and the evolution of his beliefs has been gleaned primarily from his writings.[21]: 99 [8]: 442  He claimed to be the reincarnation of bodhisattvaViśiṣṭacāritra (Jōgyō),[22][23] and designated six senior disciples, which later led to much disagreement after his death. Nichiren's harsh critiques of the Buddhist establishment led to many persecutions against him and his followers. He was exiled twice and some of his followers were imprisoned or killed.[20] After his death, Nichiren’s followers continued to grow, making it one of Japan's largest Buddhist traditions.[20] He was posthumously bestowed the titleNichiren Dai-Bosatsu (日蓮大菩薩; Great Bodhisattva Nichiren) by theEmperor Go-Kōgon in 1358.[24] The titleRisshō Daishi (立正大師; Great Teacher of Correction) was also later conferred by theEmperor Taishō in 1922.[25]

Nichiren Buddhism today includes more than forty different officially registered organizations, some of which have significant international presence. These include traditional temple schools such asNichiren-shū sects andNichiren Shōshū, as well as modern lay movements such asSoka Gakkai,Risshō Kōsei Kai,Reiyūkai,Kenshōkai,Honmon Butsuryū-shū,Kempon Hokke, andShōshinkai among many others. Each group has varying views of Nichiren's teachings, some being moreexclusivist than the others.[18][20] Some see Nichiren as being theBodhisattvaViśiṣṭacāritra, while other sects claim that Nichiren was actually thePrimordial or "True Buddha" (本仏,Honbutsu).[26][27][28][29]

Life

[edit]
Part ofa series on
Buddhism
Part of a series on
Japanese Buddhism
Kamakura period statue of Thousand-armed Kannon at Sanjūsangen-dō in Kyoto, Japan.
Kamakura period statue of Thousand-armedKannon atSanjūsangen-dō inKyoto,Japan.
History and Origins
Philosophy and Schools
Practices and Rituals
Important Figures
Historical Figures

Cultural and Modern Thinkers

Sacred Spaces and Arts
Cultural Influence
Modern Influence

The main narrative of Nichiren's life has been constructed from extant letters and treatises he wrote, counted in one collection as 523 complete writings and 248 fragments. Aside from historical documents stored in the repositories of various Nichiren sects, the first extensive non-religious biographical account of Nichiren did not appear until more than 200 years after his death.[30]: ix  Severalhagiographies about Nichiren and are reflected in various pieces of artwork about incidents in his life.[31][32][33][8]: 442 [34]

Nichiren is most well known for his promotion ofLotus Sutra devotion over and above all other Buddhist scriptures and teachings.[10]: 88 [35] He held that reciting the title of theLotus Sutra (with the formulaNam(u)-myoho-renge-kyo) encompassed all Buddhist teachings, and thus it could lead to enlightenment in this life.[13]: 328  As a result of his adamant stance, he experienced severe persecution imposed by theKamakura Shogunate, which Nichiren saw as proof of the righteousness of his cause to spread theLotus Sutra.[8]: 252 [36]: 128–130 

Nichiren remains a controversial figure among scholars who cast him as either a fervent nationalist or a social reformer with a transnational religious vision.[37] Critical scholars have used words such asintolerant,nationalistic,militaristic, and self-righteous to portray him.[38] On the other hand, Nichiren has been presented as arevolutionary,[39] a classic reformer,[40]: 403  and as aprophet.[40][41]: 3 [42] Nichiren is often compared to other religious figures who shared similar rebellious and revolutionary drives to reform degeneration in their respective societies or schools.[43][44][45][46]

Birth

[edit]

According to the lunarChinese calendar, Nichiren was born on 16th of the second month in 1222, which is 6 April in theGregorian calendar.[47]

Nichiren was born in the village of Kominato (today part of the city ofKamogawa), Nagase District,Awa Province (within present-dayChiba Prefecture). Accounts of his lineage vary. Nichiren described himself as "the son of aSendara (Skt: chandala, despised outcast), "a son born of the lowly people living on a rocky strand of the out-of-the-way sea," and "the son of a sea-diver." In contrast,Hōnen,Shinran,Dōgen, andEisai, the other founders of religious schools who predated Nichiren, were all born in the Kyoto region and came from noble or samurai backgrounds. Although his writings reflect a fierce pride of his lowly birth, followers after his death began to ascribe to him a more noble lineage, perhaps to attract more adherents.[48][49] Some have claimed his father was arōnin,[50] a manorial functionary (shokan),[11]: 5  or a political refugee.[51][49][30]: 4 

Nichiren's father was Mikuni-no-Tayu Shigetada, also known as Nukina Shigetada Jiro (died 1258); and his mother was Umegiku-nyo (died 1267). On his birth, his parents named himZennichimaro (善日麿) which has variously been translated into English as "Splendid Sun" and "Virtuous Sun Boy" among others.[52] The exact site of Nichiren's birth is believed to be currently submerged off the shore from present-day Kominato-zanTanjō-ji (小湊山誕生寺) near a temple in Kominato that commemorates his birth.[20]

Buddhist education

[edit]

At the age of 12 he began his Buddhist study at a temple of theTendai school,Seichō-ji (清澄寺; also called Kiyosumi-dera).[41]: 13  He was formally ordained as a novice at sixteen years old to became a monk at twenty years old and took the Buddhist nameZeshō-bō Renchō (是生房蓮長),Renchō meaning "Lotus Growth".[20]

Between the years 1233 and 1253 Nichiren studied the major Buddhist traditions in Japan at that time, includingTendai,Pure Land Buddhism andShingon.[20] During these years, he became convinced of the preeminence of theLotus Sutra and in 1253 returned to the temple where he first studied to present his findings.[53]: 129 [8]: 443–444 [54][41]: 17 [55][10]: 90 

In a 1271 letter Nichiren writes of this time of his life:

Determined to plant a seed of Buddhahood and attain Buddhahood in this life, just as all other people, I relied on Amida Buddha and chanted the name of this Buddha since childhood. However, I began doubting this practice, making a vow to study all the Buddhist sutras, commentaries on them by disciples, and explanatory notes by others.[56]

He later left Seichō-ji forKamakura where he studiedPure Land Buddhism, a school that stressed salvation through the invocation of the nameAmitābha (JapaneseAmida), a practiced callednembutsu. He also studiedZen which had been growing in popularity in both Kamakura andKyoto. He next traveled toMount Hiei, the center of JapaneseTendai Buddhism, where he scrutinized the school's original doctrines, including Pure Land and TendaiEsoteric Buddhism. In the final stage of this twenty-year period he traveled toMount Kōya, the center ofShingon esoteric Buddhism, and toNara where he studied itssix established schools, especially theRitsu sect which emphasizedstrict monastic discipline.[57][58]: 243–245 

Declaration of theLotus Sutra

[edit]

According to one of his letters, Nichiren returned to Seicho-ji Temple on 28 April 1253 to lecture on the supremacy of theLotus Sutra.[20][58]: 246  What followed was his first public declaration ofNam(u) Myoho Renge Kyo atop Mount Kiyosumi that same day. This marked the start of his campaign to convince theTendai tradition to shift its focus back to theLotus Sutra and his efforts to convert the entire Japanese nation to this belief.[42]: 233  This declaration also marks the start of his efforts to make profound Buddhist theory practical and actionable so an ordinary person could manifest Buddhahood within his or her own lifetime in the midst of day-to-day realities.[59]

At the same event, according to his own account and subsequent hagiography, he changed his name toNichiren, anabbreviation ofnichi (; "Sun") andren (; "Lotus").[41]: 34 Nichi represents both the light of truth and the sun goddessAmaterasu, symbolizing Japan itself.Ren signifies theLotus Sutra. Nichiren envisioned Japan as the country where the true teaching of Buddhism would be revived and the starting point for its worldwide spread.[60]

At his lecture, it is construed, Nichiren vehemently attackedHonen, the founder ofPure Land Buddhism, and its practice of chanting theNembutsu. It is likely he also denounced the nembutsu teachings found atSeicho-ji.[20] In so doing he earned the animosity of the local steward, Tojo Kagenobu, and eventually Nichiren was forced to leave the temple.[20] Modern scholarship suggests that events unfolded not in a single day but over a longer period of time and had social, and political dimensions.[58]: 246–247 [30]: 6–7 

Nichiren then moved to a hermitage in the hills aroundKamakura.[20] From there he converted several Tendai priests, directly ordained others, and attracted lay disciples who were drawn mainly from the strata of the lower and middlesamurai class. Their households provided Nichiren with economic support and became the core Nichiren communities in several locations in theKanto region of Japan.[58]: 246–247 [30]: 7–8 

First remonstration to the Kamakura government

[edit]
The banishment of Nichiren in 1261. The discipleNichirō wished to follow but was forbidden to do so. Tourist postcard artwork, circa 1920s.

Nichiren arrived in Kamakura in 1254. Between 1254 and 1260 half of the population had perished due to a tragic succession of calamities that included drought, earthquakes, epidemics, famine, fires, and storms.[58]: 432#49  Nichiren sought scriptural references to explain the unfolding of natural disasters and then wrote a series of works which, based on the Buddhist theory of the non-duality of the human mind and the environment, attributed the sufferings to the weakened spiritual condition of people, thereby causing theKami (protectiveforces or traces of the Buddha) to abandon the nation. The root cause of this, he argued, was the widespread decline of theDharma due to the mass adoption of the exclusive nembutsu teachings ofHōnen.[58]: 249–250 [61]: 124–125 

The most renowned of these works, considered his first major treatise, was theRisshō Ankoku Ron (立正安国論), "On Securing the Peace of the Land through the Propagation of True Buddhism."[note 1] Nichiren submitted it toHōjō Tokiyori, thede facto leader of theKamakura shogunate, as a political move to effectuate radical reform. In it he argued the necessity for "the Sovereign to recognize and accept the singly true and correct form of Buddhism (i.e.,立正risshō) as the only way to achieve peace and prosperity for the land and its people and end their suffering (i.e.,安国ankoku)."[62][63][64]

Using a dialectic form well-established in China and Japan, the treatise is a 10-segment fictional dialogue between a Buddhist wise man, presumably Nichiren, and a visitor who together lament the tragedies that have beleaguered the nation. The wise man answers the guest's questions and, after a heated exchange, gradually leads him to enthusiastically embrace the vision of a country grounded firmly on the ideals of theLotus Sutra. In this writing Nichiren displays a skill in using analogy, anecdote, and detail to persuasively appeal to an individual's unique psychology, experiences, and level of understanding.[65][13]: 328 [30]: 10 

The teacher builds his argument by quoting extensively from a set of Buddhist sutras and commentaries. In his future writings Nichiren continued to draw from the same sutras and commentaries which he deemed supportive of theLotus Sutra, including theKonkomyo,Daijuku,Ninno,Yakushi, andNirvana sutras. They share in common themes like prophecies ofDharma decline and nation-protecting teachings.[65]: 330–334  TheRisshō Ankoku Ron concludes with an urgent appeal to the ruler to cease all financial support for Buddhist schools promoting inferior teachings.[65]: 334  Otherwise, Nichiren warns, as predicted by the sutras, the continued influence of inferior teachings would invite even more natural disasters as well as the outbreak of civil strife and foreign invasion.[13]: 328 

Nichiren submitted his treatise on 16 July 1260 but it drew no official response. It did, however, prompt a severe backlash from the Buddhist priests of other schools. Nichiren was challenged to a religious debate with leading Kamakura prelates in which, by his account, they were swiftly dispatched. Their lay followers then formed a mob and attacked Nichiren at his dwelling, forcing him to flee Kamakura. His critics had influence with key governmental figures and spread slanderous rumors about him. One year after he submitted theRissho Ankoku Ron the authorities had him arrested and exiled to the Izu peninsula.[58]: 251 

Nichiren's Izu exile lasted two years. In his extant writings from this time period, Nichiren began to strongly draw from chapters 10–22 of theLotus Sutra, what Tanabe calls its "third realm"(daisan hōmon). Nichiren began to emphasize the purpose of human existence as being the practice of thebodhisattva ideal in the real world which entails undertaking struggle and manifesting endurance. He suggested that he is a model of this behavior, a "votary" (gyōja) of the Lotus Sutra.[66][58]: 252 [67][68][30]: 11–12 

Tojo no Saemon Attacks Nichiren at Komatsubara

Upon being pardoned in 1263 Nichiren returned to Kamakura. In November 1264 he was ambushed and nearly killed at Komatsubara in Awa Province by a force led by Lord Tōjō Kagenobu. He suffered a broken arm and a sword cut across his forehead, and one of his followers was killed.[20] For the next few years he preached in provinces outside of Kamakura but returned in 1268. At this point the Mongols sent envoys to Japan demanding tribute and threatening invasion. Nichiren sent 11 letters to influential leaders reminding them about his predictions in theRissho Ankoku Ron.[5]: 7–8 

Attempt at execution

[edit]

The threat ofMongol invasion was the worst crisis in pre-modern Japanese history. In 1269 Mongol envoys again arrived to demand Japanese submission to their hegemony and thebakufu responded by mobilizing military defenses.[30]: 13  The role of Buddhism in "nation-protection" (chingo kokka) was long established in Japan at this time and the government galvanized prayers from Buddhist schools for this purpose. Nichiren and his followers, however, felt emboldened that the predictions he had made in 1260 of foreign invasion seemingly were being fulfilled. Nichiren redoubled his efforts and continued to give regular lectures as more people joined the movement.[20] Daring a rash response from thebakufu, Nichiren vowed in letters to his followers that he was giving his life to actualize theLotus Sutra. He accelerated his polemics against the non-Lotus teachings the government had been patronizing at the very time it was attempting to solidify national unity and resolve. In a series of letters to prominent leaders he directly provoked the major prelates of Kamakura temples that the Hojo family patronized, criticized the principles ofZen which was popular among the samurai class, critiqued the esoteric practices ofShingon just as the government was invoking them, and condemned the ideas underlyingRisshū as it was enjoying a revival.[8]: 454–455 [58]: 257 His actions at that time have been described by modern scholars either as a high form of altruism,[69] or the ravings of a fanatic.[70]

His claims drew the ire of the influential religious figures of the time and their followers, especially the Shingon priestRyōkan (良観). In September 1271, after a fiery exchange of letters between the two, Nichiren was arrested by a band of soldiers and tried by Hei no Saemon (平の左衛門; also called平頼綱Taira no Yoritsuna), the deputy chief of theHojo clan's Board of Retainers. Nichiren considered this as his second remonstration to the government.[71][58]: 257 

Depiction of the alleged execution event stopped by a bright orb

According to Nichiren's own account, he was sentenced to exile but was brought to Tatsunukuchi beach inShichirigahama for execution. According to some traditional accounts, the execution was stopped at the final moment as "a brilliant orb as bright as the moon" arced over the execution grounds, terrifying Nichiren's executioners.[72] Modern scholars have proposed alternative narratives for this story and question its historicity.[20][58]: 257, 436 (note 99)  Whatever the case, Nichiren himself believed he had undergone a transformative experience.[20] After this event, Nichiren was exiled toSado Island. This incident has become known as the "Tatsunokuchi Persecution" and was regarded by Nichiren as a death-and-resurrection turning point.[58]: 257–258, 436 (note 100) [41]: 58  In the Nichiren tradition this is called his moment ofHosshaku kenpon (発迹顕本), translated as "casting off the transient and revealing the true"[73] or "outgrowing the provisional and revealing the essential."[74]

Second banishment and exile

[edit]
Nichiren in the Snow at Tsukahara, Sado Province

Nichiren was then exiled to a second location, onSado Island in theSea of Japan. Upon arriving, he was dispatched to a small dilapidated temple located in a graveyard. Nichiren was accompanied by a few disciples and in the first winter they endured terrible cold, food deprivation, and threats from local inhabitants.[58]: 258  Nichiren scholars describe a clear shift in both tone and message in letters written before his Sado exile and those written during and after.[75]: 238  Initially, Nichiren's urgent concern was to rally his followers in Kamakura. The tactics of thebakufu suppression of the Nichiren community included exile, imprisonment, land confiscation, or ousting from clan membership. Apparently a majority of his disciples abandoned their faith and others questioned why they and Nichiren were facing such adversity in light of theLotus Sutra's promise of "peace and security in the present life."[58]: 258–259 

In some of his writings during a second exile (1271–1274), Nichiren began to identify himself with two majorLotus Sutra bodhisattvas:Sadāparibhūta andViśiṣṭacāritra.[10]: 99, 100 Sadāparibhūta ("Never Despising") is a key figure in theLotus Sutra, who in the 20th chapter invited repeated persecution in his efforts to propagate the sutra by paying homage to everyone he meets and telling them they will be a Buddha.[20] His hardship, Nichiren argued, fulfilled and validated theLotus Sutra. He thus began to see himself as "bodily reading the Lotus Sutra (Jpn. Hokke shikidoku), which meant that due to his attempts to teach theLotus Sutra and the hardships he faced, he was re-enacting the practices ofSadāparibhūta bodhisattva.[8]: 252 [36]: 128–130  Nichiren also identified himself with the bodhisattvaViśiṣṭacāritra ("Superior Practice") to whom Shakyamuni entrusted the future propagation of theLotus Sutra, seeing himself in the role of leading a vast outpouring ofBodhisattvas of the Earth who pledged to liberate the oppressed.[10]: 99, 100 [76][58]: 259 

Konpon Temple was built onSado where Nichiren lived during his exile.

The numerous letters and minor treatises he wrote in Sado include what is considered his two most significant works, theKanjin no Honzon Shō (観心本尊抄; "The Object of Devotion for Observing the Mind")[62][77] and theKaimoku Shō (開目抄; "On the Opening of the Eyes").[78] The former text discusses the practice of daimoku as a form of "mind contemplation" (kanjin 観心), which is the appropriate practice for the Age of Dharma Decline.[20] In the latter text he stated that facing adversity should be regarded as a matter of course and that the resolve to carry on with the mission to propagate the sutra was for him more important than guarantees of protection: "Let Heaven forsake me. Let ordeals confront me. I will not begrudge bodily life... . No matter what trials we may encounter, so long as we do not have a mind of doubt, I and my disciples will naturally achieve the Buddha realm." He concluded this work with the vow to be the "pillar of Japan, the eyes of Japan, the great ship of Japan."[58]: 259 [13]: 329 

The Mandala Gohonzon

[edit]
Main article:Gohonzon
Nichiren bowing before the Mandala Gohonzon which he wrote by himself

At the end of the 1271–1272 winter Nichiren's conditions had improved. He had attracted a small band of followers in Sado who provided him with support and disciples from the mainland began visiting him and providing supplies. In 1272 there was an attempted coup in Kamakura and Kyoto, seemingly fulfilling the prediction he had made in theRissho Ankoku Ron of rebellion in the country. At this point Nichiren was transferred to much better accommodations.[58]: 259 [8]: 452 

While on Sado island, Nichiren inscribed the first MandalaGohonzon (御本尊). Although there is evidence of a Gohonzon in embryonic form as far back as the days right before his exile, the first in full form is dated to 8 July 1273 and includes the inscription of "Nichiren inscribes this for the first time."[58]: 437, note 114  His writings on Sado provide his rationale for a calligraphicmandala depicting the assembly atVulture Peak (Gṛdhrakūṭa) which was to be used as an object of devotion or worship. Nichiren found doctrinal rational for this in the 16th (Life span) chapter of theLotus Sutra. It is at this time that he developed the concept of a three-fold "secret Dharma" of thedaimoku, the object of worship (honzon), and the ordination platform (kaidan).[58]: 259–260 

At the bottom of each mandala he wrote: "This is the great mandala never before revealed inJambudvipa during the more than 2,200 years since the Buddha's nirvana." He inscribed many Mandala Gohonzon during the rest of his life. More than a hundred Mandala Gohonzon preserved today are attributed to Nichiren's own hand.[10]: 96 

Return to Kamakura

[edit]

In 1274, after his two predictions of foreign invasion and political strife were seemingly actualized by the firstattempted Mongol invasion of Japan along with an unsuccessful coup within theHōjō clan, Nichiren was pardoned by the Shogunate authorities.[5]: 9–10 The pardon came in effect on 14 February 1274 and Nichiren returned to Kamakura one month later on March 26.[58]: 260  Nichiren wrote that his innocence and the accuracy of his predictions caused the regentHōjō Tokimune to intercede on his behalf. Scholars have suggested that some of his well-connected followers might have had influence on the government's decision to release him.[58]: 437, note 115 

On 8 April he was summoned by Hei no Saemon, who inquired about the timing of the nextMongol invasion. Nichiren predicted that it would occur within the year. He used the audience as yet another opportunity to remonstrate with the government. Claiming that reliance on prayers based on esoteric rituals would invite further calamity, he urged thebakufu to ground itself exclusively on the Lotus Sutra.[58]: 261 

Deeply disappointed by the government's refusal to heed his advice, Nichiren left Kamakura one month later, on 12 May, determined to become a solitary wayfarer. Five days later, however, on a visit to the residence of Lord Hakii Sanenaga of Mt. Minobu, he learned that followers in nearby regions had held steadfast during his exile. Despite severe weather and deprivation, Nichiren remained in Minobu for the rest of his career.[58]: 261 

Retirement to Mount Minobu

[edit]
The Eternal Temple on Mount Minobu

During his self-imposed exile at Mount Minobu, a location in Kai province, 100 miles west ofKamakura.[79][80][81] Nichiren led a widespread movement of followers inKanto andSado mainly through his prolific letter-writing. During the so-called "Atsuhara affair" of 1279 when governmental attacks were aimed at Nichiren's followers rather than himself, Nichiren's letters reveal an assertive and well-informed leader who provided detailed instructions through a sophisticated network of disciples serving as liaisons between Minobu and other affected areas in Japan. He also showed the ability to provide a compelling narrative of events that gave his followers a broad perspective of what was unfolding.[82]

More than half of the extant letters of Nichiren were written during his years at Minobu. Some consisted of moving letters to followers expressing appreciation for their assistance, counseling on personal matters, and explaining his teachings in more understandable terms.[58]: 261 [83] Two of his works from this period, theSenji Shō (撰時抄; "The Selection of the Time")[84] and theHōon Shō (報恩抄; "On Repaying Debts of Gratitude")[85] constitute, along with hisRisshō Ankoku Ron ("On Establishing the Correct Teaching for the Peace of the Land"),Kaimoku Shō ("The Opening of the Eyes"), andKanjin no Honzon Shō ("The Object of Devotion for Observing the Mind"), what is commonly regarded as his five major writings.

During his years at Minobu Nichiren intensified his attacks onmystical and esoteric practices (密教,mikkyō) that had been incorporated into the JapaneseTendai school. It becomes clear at this point that he understood that he was creating his own form of Lotus Buddhism.[86]: 362  Nichiren and his disciples completed theMyō-hōkke-in Kuon-ji Temple (久遠寺) in 1281. In the 19th century this structure burned down to be replaced by a new structure completed in the second half of the Meiji era.[87]: 117 [88]

While at Minobu Nichiren also inscribed numerous MandalaGohonzon for bestowal upon specific disciples and lay believers.Nichiren Shoshu believers claim that after the execution of the three Atsuhara farmers he inscribed theDai Gohonzon on 12 October 1279, a Gohonzon specifically addressed to all humanity. This assertion has been disputed by other schools as historically and textually incorrect.[89][10]: 189  It is apparent that Nichiren took great care in deciding which of his disciples were eligible to receive a Gohonzon inscribed by him. In the case of a letter written to Lady Niiama he took great care to explain why he would not inscribe a Gohonzon despite a deep personal bond.[30]: 52–55  Among the Gohonzon he inscribed were several that were quite large and perhaps intended for congregational use in chapels maintained by some lay followers.[58]: 275 

Death

[edit]
Memorial tower erected on the spot where Nichiren was cremated in 1282 (Ikegami Honmon-ji Temple, Tokyo)

In 1282, after years of seclusion, Nichiren fell ill. His followers encouraged him to travel to the hot springs in Hitachi for their medicinal benefits. He was also encouraged by his disciples to travel there for the warmer weather, and to use the land offered by Hagiri Sanenaga for recuperation. En route, unable to travel further, he stopped at the home of a disciple inIkegami, outside of present-day Tokyo, and died on 13 October 1282. According to legend, he died in the presence of fellow disciples after having spent several days lecturing from his sickbed on the Lotus Sutra, writing a final letter, and leaving instructions for the future of his movement after his death, namely the designation of the six senior disciples. His funeral and cremation took place the following day.[58]: 261 [41]: 133 [90]

His disciples left Ikegami with Nichiren's ashes on 21 October, reaching back to Minobu on 25 October.

Teachings

[edit]
Print illustration of Nichiren and a disciple, byTsukioka Yoshitoshi.

Nichiren's teachings developed over the course of his career and their evolution can be seen through the study of his writings as well as in the annotations he made in his personal copy of theLotus Sutra, the so-calledChū-hokekyō.[92]: 363  Some scholars set a clear demarcation in his teachings divided by his arrival on Sado Island, whereas others see a threefold division of thought: (1) up to and through the Izu exile, (2) from his return to Kamakura through the Sado Island exile, and (3) during his years at Minobu.[92]: 252–253 [93]: 238  According to Anesaki, Nichiren, upon his arrival at Minobu, quickly turned his attention to consolidating his teachings toward their perpetuation. The scope of his thinking was outlined in an essayHokke Shuyō-shō (法華取要抄; "Choosing the Heart of the Lotus Sutra"), considered byNikkō Shōnin as one of Nichiren's ten major writings.[94][41]: 98 

Nichiren's main ideas include an affirmation of the supremacy of theLotus Sutra and the eternal Buddha of theLotus Sutra, the fact that all beings could achieve Buddhahood in this life, the centrality of thedaimoku as the best practice formappō, and the importance of spreading the teachings of theLotus Sutra.[20][41]: 98–100  Nichiren's vision of widely and extensively spreading theLotus Sutra (Kosen-rufu) looks towards a time when the teachings would be widely spread throughout the world.[95] Nichiren also set a precedent for Buddhistactivism centuries before its emergence in other Buddhist schools. He held adamantly that his teachings would permit a nation to right itself and ultimately lead to world peace.[96][75]: 251 [97][98]: 54 

Some of his religious thinking was derived from theTendai tradition and the works of ChineseTiantai mastersZhiyi andZhanran, as well as from new perspectives that were products ofKamakura Buddhism.[98]: vii–ix  Other ideas were completely original and unique to Nichiren.

The Final Age and the state of Japan

[edit]

TheKamakura period (1185-1333) was characterized by a sense of decline and foreboding. Nichiren, as well as the others of this time, believed that they had entered theAge of Dharma Decline or the "Final Dharma Age" (Mappō). The Kamakura period, a time of natural disasters, internal strife, wars, and political conflict, gave many Japanese the impression that the era of decline had begun.[99] According to variousMahayana sutras, during the age of decline, most of the Buddha's teachings would be lost or lose their efficacy. Nichiren held that since Japan had entered Mappō, teachings likenembutsu, Zen and esoteric practices were no longer effective – onlyLotus Sutra practices were effective.[20]

Nichiren also believed that the world had entered the final age of degeneration. Like many Buddhists of his time, he held that this was a reflection of the degenerate state of the minds of the people. This is based on the classic Mahayana theory that says that the world is a reflection of the collective karmic traces of the minds of all beings living in the world.[100] For Nichiren, the activities of the Japanese elite had caused the current state of chaos.[100] Furthermore, Nichiren held that due to their lack of virtue, Japan was being abandoned by the gods, leading to the natural disasters which were occurring and to the threat of Mongol invasion. Japan had a long-established system of folk beliefs (now calledShinto) based on localKami (indigenous deities). These had been adopted by Buddhist traditions, who often argued thatkami were 'traces' of the Buddha. Buddhists institutions often engaged in rites calling on Kami as well as onBuddhist deities, to protect the nation (chingo kokka).[58]: 40–42, 166 [101][102] Nichiren argued that the various protective deities had abandoned Japan because the court and the people had turned away from the true Dharma of theLotus Sutra to false teachings.[103][104] Thus, if the government and the people turned to the true Dharma, society would transform into an ideal world in which peace and wisdom prevail and "the wind will not thrash the branches nor the rain fall hard enough to break clods."[58]: 291–292 

Although Nichiren attributed the turmoils and disasters in society to the widespread practice of what he deemed inferior Buddhist teachings sponsored by the government, he was also enthusiastically upbeat about the portent of the age. He asserted, in contrast to other schools, Mappō was the best possible time to be alive, since now theBodhisattvas of the Earth would appear teach and spread theLotus Sutra.[58]: 56, 254 [105]

Five Principles

[edit]

Nichiren also taught Five Principles (gogi) or five criteria for evaluating Buddhist teachings and establishing the supremacy of theLotus Sutra as the highest and best teaching for Japan at his time. The five are:[58]: 252–255 [106][107]

  • The teaching (kyō) - Following theTiantai classification system, Nichiren sees the Lotus as part of the last teaching period of the Buddha and as the real true (jitsu) teaching, while all other teachings are provisional (gon). He cites Tiantai masters likeZhiyi, and theLotus Sutra itself and points to its teachings on the one vehicle and the eternal immanent nature of the Buddha to prove this.
  • The innate capacity (ki) of the people - Nichiren held that people of the Final Dharma Age lack good roots (honmi uzen). Thus, they first need to encounter theLotus Sutra to plant these good roots. Nichiren rejects the view ofHōnen that the Lotus is too profound for beings of the Final Age. Nichiren citesZhanran who writes "the more true the teaching, the lower the stage [of the practitioners it can bring to enlightenment]". Thus, Nichiren argues that faith in theLotus Sutra can save all types of people, even the most ignorant or lowly.
  • The time (ji), which refers to the Final Dharma Age. Nichiren believed that theLotus Sutra was the right sutra for the Final Age, and that thedaimoku was the right teaching for this time, being easy and accessible to all.
  • The land or country (koku) - As Stone writes "following earlier Tendai thinkers such asSaichō,Annen, andGenshin, Nichiren argued that the country of Japan is related exclusively to theLotus Sutra."
  • The sequence of Dharma propagation (kyōhō rufu no zengo), which means that one should not teach an inferior or provisional teaching in a place where a superior teaching has already been taught.

Buddhahood and the mutual inclusion of all realms

[edit]
Japanese illustration depicting the mutual inclusion of theten realms within the mind (xin, 心) of a fetus.

Nichiren stressed the idea that the Buddha'sPure Land isimmanent in this present world (shaba soku jakkōdo) and that all beings have the innate potential to attainBuddhahood in this very body (sokushin jōbutsu), though this can only be achieved by relying on theLotus Sutra. Nichiren was influenced by earlier ideas taught byKūkai andSaichō, who had taught the possibility of becoming a Buddha in this life and the belief all beings are "originally enlightened" (hongaku).[108][109][20]

In theTendai school, these theories were also closely related toZhiyi's theory of the "mutual inclusion of the ten Dharma-realms" (jikkai gogu 十界互具), also calledThree Thousand Realms in a Single Thought (ichinen sanzen 一念三千), as well as onZhanran's view of the all-pervasive character ofBuddha-nature.[110][20] AsJacqueline Stone writes "ichinen sanzen means that the smallest phenomenon (a single thought-moment) and the entire cosmos (three thousand realms) are mutually encompassing: the one and the many; good and evil; delusion and awakening; subject and object; self and other; and all sentient beings from hell dwellers, hungry ghosts, and animals up through bodhisattvas and buddhas, as well as their respective environments, simultaneously interpenetrate and encompass one another without losing their individual identity."[20] This realization is itself the wisdom of the Buddha, and the "Wonderful Dharma" (myōhō 妙法) taught by theLotus Sutra.[20]

Nichiren sawichinen sanzen as pointing to the potential for Buddhahood in all beings (ri no ichinen sanzen 理の一念三千) and to the actualization of Buddhahood itself (ji no ichinen sanzen 事の一念三千), which encompasses and illuminates all other realms. He associated these with the "trace" teaching of the first half of theLotus Sutra and with the "origin" teaching of the latter half of the sutra respectively.[20] He also saw ichinen sanzen as the ultimate truth and the heart of theLotus Sutra, writing that "only theTiantai ichinen sanzen is the path of attaining Buddhahood."[111] However, he also saw his own teaching of ichinen sanzen as different and as going beyond that which was taught by Zhiyi. This is because Nichiren held that his teaching of the "true ichinen sanzen" was based on the latter half of theLotus Sutra (the origin teaching), instead of on second chapter. For Nichiren this is "the doctrine of original cause (hon’in) and original effect (honga). The nine realms are inherent in the beginningless Buddha realm; the Buddha realm inheres in the beginningless nine realms." This teaching "demolishes" all views of gradual training.[112]

Single-minded devotion to theLotus Sutra

[edit]

Nichiren held that this teaching of the interfusion of all reality, the ultimate meaning of theLotus Sutra, could now be realized solely through devotion to the sutra, especially by the practice of faithfully chanting the title of the sutra (daimoku). This allowed one to contemplate one's mind (kanjin) and to attain the fruit of Buddhahood in this life.[20] This was possible because theLotus Sutra and the daimoku contains the entirety of the Buddha's teachings within it, as well as all ofShakyamuni Buddha's power and merits.[20] This is Nichiren's teaching of ichinen sanzen as "actuality" (ji), meaning a practice that relies on an actual form (jisō), which he contrasted with the teaching of Zhiyi'sMohe Zhiguan which taught ichinen sanzen of "principle" (ri).[113]

According to Nichiren, Buddhahood would manifest when a person faithfully chants the sutra's title and shares it with others, at whatever the cost.[58]: 68, 265–266  Indeed, for Nichiren,Lotus Sutra focused practice was the only efficacious practice in the Final Dharma Age.[20] This is because Nichiren held that theLotus Sutra contains the true intent of the Buddha:

TheLotus Sutra is the written expression of Śākyamuni Tathāgata’s intent; it is his pure voice transformed into written words. Thus its written words are endowed with the Buddha’s mind. It is like the case of seeds, sprouts, shoots, and grain; though they differ in form, their essence is the same. Śākyamuni Buddha and the words of theLotus Sutra are different, but their spirit is one. Thus when you look upon the words of the Lotus Sutra, you should think that you are encountering the living Śākyamuni Tathāgata.[114]

Nichiren emphasized the importance of faith, practice, and study. Faith meant embracing theLotus Sutra, something that needed to be continually deepened. "To accept (ju) [faith in the sutra] is easy," he explained to a follower, "to uphold it (ji) is difficult. But the realization of Buddhahood lies in upholding [faith]." This could only be manifested by the practice of chanting thedaimoku as well as teaching others to do the same, and study.[58]: 270, 295 [115]: 12–13 

Consequently, Nichiren consistently and vehemently objected to the perspective of thePure Land School that stressed an other-worldly aspiration to somePure Land outside of this world. Behind his assertion is the concept of thenonduality of the subjective realm (the individual) and the objective realm (the land that the individual inhabits) which indicates that when the individual taps into Buddhahood, his or her present world becomes peaceful and harmonious. For Nichiren the widespread propagation of theLotus Sutra and consequent world peace ("kosen-rufu") was achievable and inevitable. He thus tasked his future followers with a mandate to accomplish it.[116][117]: 68 

While Nichiren critiquedHōnen's Pure Land tradition for sidelining theLotus Sutra, he was also influenced by it.Hōnen had introduced the concept of focusing on a single practice over all others (which was to benembutsu). This practice was revolutionary because it was simple and accessible to all. It also minimalized theelitist and monopolistic role of the Buddhist establishment.[118][119][120] Nichiren appropriated the structure of a universally accessible single practice but substituted the nembutsu with the recitation of the daimoku (Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō), while also affirming that this practice could lead to Buddhahood in this life, instead of just leading to birth in a Pure Land.[36]: 124 

The Three Great Secret Dharmas

[edit]

Since Nichiren deemed the world to be in a degenerate age where most teachings were ineffective, he held that people required a simple and effective method to attain Buddhahood. According to Nichiren, the way to Buddhahood was through theThree Great Secret Dharmas (sandai hihō 三大秘法): the invocation of theLotus Sutra's title (daimoku), the object of worship (honzon), and the ordination platform or place of worship (kaidan).[121]: 353  Nichiren held that these three Dharmas are the concrete manifestations of "the actualization of ichinen sanzen" (ji no ichinen sanzen) specific to the Age of Dharma Decline.[20]

A work attributed to Nichiren named theSandai hi hō honjōji (三大秘法稟承事,Transmission of the Three Great Secret Dharmas) states that Nichiren discovered the three Dharmas in the 16th chapter of theLotus Sutra, and that as the leader of theBodhisattvas of the Earth, he secretly received them from the original Buddha (honbutsu) who resides in the originally existing Land of Tranquil Light.[122]: 266 [58]: 264 [121]: 353  Several modern scholars have questioned the authenticity of this text however.[20][122]: 266, 268 [123]

According to Nichiren, practicing the Three Secret Dharmas results in the "Three Proofs" which verify their validity. The first proof is "documentary," whether the religion's fundamental texts, here the writings of Nichiren, make a lucid case for the eminence of the religion. "Theoretical proof" is an intellectual standard of whether a religion's teachings reasonably clarify the mysteries of life and death. "Actual proof," deemed the most important by Nichiren, demonstrates the validity of the teaching through the actual improvements and experiences which manifest in the daily life of practitioners.[124][125][126][127][128]

Daimoku

[edit]
Nichiren depicted calming a storm by chanting the daimoku.

Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō, thedaimoku ("the title" of theLotus Sutra preceded by "Namu", meaning "homage to"), is both the essence of theLotus Sutra's Dharma and the means to discover that truth, i.e. the interconnected unity of self, others and environment with Buddhahood itself. Nichiren sees this as the only truly effective practice, the superior Buddhist practice for this time. Thus, according to Nichiren, "it is better to be a leper who chants Nam(u) Myōhō Renge Kyō than be a chief abbot of the Tendai school."[58]: 56, 254 [105] For Nichiren, the daimoku is "the heart of the eighty thousand sacred teachings and the eye of all buddhas," and contains the entireBuddhadharma.[20]

Nichiren was influenced byZhiyi, who argued in hisProfound Meaning of the Lotus Sūtra (Fahua xuanyi 法華玄義) that the title of the sutra contains the meaning of the entire sutra (which itself contains the whole of Buddhism). Stone writes, "for Nichiren, the daimoku, as the embodiment of ichinen sanzen, encompasses all phenomena, including all beings and their environments in the ten realms of existence."[20] This non-dual reality is contained in the termMyōhō (Miao in Chinese).[129]

Furthermore, the daimoku is also said to contain the Buddha's enlightenment and all his spiritual powers.[20] As he writes in theKanjin honzon shō: "Śākyamuni’s causal practices and their resulting virtues are all contained within the five characters Myōhō Renge Kyō. When we embrace these five characters, he will naturally transfer to us the merit of his causes and effects."[20] He also writes:

For those who are incapable of understanding the truth of ichinen sanzen, Lord Śākyamuni Buddha, with His great compassion, wraps this jewel in the five characters of myō, hō, ren, ge, and kyō and hangs it around the neck of the ignorant in the Latter Age of Degeneration.[130]

Like other Tendai figures of his time, Nichiren held that theLotus Sutra taught the unity of the cause (skillful means) and the effect (Buddhahood). Nichiren held that the termRenge (Dharma Flower) represents how the cause and the effect (practice and Buddhahood) are one. This is symbolized by the lotus flower because its blossoms and seed pods grow at the same time.[129]

Thus, the chanting of the daimoku allowed one to access all the merit of the Buddha's practices. It links a practitioner to the Buddha's wisdom which sees all of reality as a single whole and thus allows one to attain the "realization of buddhahood with this very body."[20]

Furthermore, Nichiren saw this practice as going beyong the self-power versusother-power dichotomy used by Pure Land Buddhism:

The Lotus Sutra establishes self-power but is not self-power. Since the "self" encompasses all beings of the ten realms, one’s own person from the outset contains the Buddha realm of both oneself and of all be- ings. Thus one does not now become a Buddha for the first time. [The sutra] also establishes other-power but is not other-power. Since the Buddha who is "other" is contained within us ordinary worldlings, this Buddha naturally manifests himself as identical to ourselves.[131]

For Nichiren, Buddhahood is immanently accessible through the daimoku. Nichiren also saw the daimoku as granting worldly benefits, such as healing and protection from harm.[20] He taught that by relying on the daimoku, one would achieve a state of inner fredom, writing: "Recognize suffering as suffering, enjoy pleasures for what they are, and whether in suffering or joy, keep chanting Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō... Then you will know the joy of the Dharma for yourself."[20]

Gohonzon

[edit]
Great Mandala by Nichiren, Honman-ji,Kyoto.

The chanting of the daimoku is to be done while contemplating the daimandara 大曼荼羅 ("greatmandala") orgohonzon 御本尊 ("revered object of worship").[20] Japanese Buddhists often had a personal shrine with an object of worship (honzon), which could be a painting, mandala or statue. These objects were often held to embody the powers of the Buddhas. Nichiren created a unique honzon style in the form of a calligraphic mandala (in Chinese characters and two Siddham glyphs) representing the entire cosmos, specifically centered around theLotus Sutra's ceremony in the air aboveVulture Peak.[20][132][121]: 354 

Nichiren inscribed many of these mandalas as personal honzons for his followers. More than 120 of them survive in Nichiren's own hand with his signature.[20] Nichiren drew on earlier visual representations of theLotus Sutra and was also influenced by contemporary figures likeMyōe andShinran who also created calligraphic honzon for their disciples. Since these did not require expert painters or expensive materials to make, they could be made in larger numbers for wide dissemination.[20]

Nichiren's gohonzons contain the daimoku written vertically in the center. It is flanked by the names ofŚākyamuni andPrabhūtaratna Buddha, as well as the names of various bodhisattvas (especially prominent being theFour Bodhisattvas of the Earth), deities, and other beings. These figures also representichinen sanzen, the mutual inclusion of the ten realms. Thus, the great mandala embodies the entire cosmos and its interfusion with Buddhahood.[20] In other words, the gohonzon symbolizes the non-duality between our world and the sacred realm of the original Buddha of theLotus Sutra, where the sutra is being taught eternally.[133]

According to Stone, the logic of this mandala is influenced byEsoteric Buddhistyogas, in which the yogi visualizes their unity with the Buddha realm.[20] However, for Nichiren, the unity of oneself and the Buddha is not achieved through yogic means, but mainly through faith. As Stone explains, "by chanting the daimoku, the devotee "enters" the mandala, the realm of the original Buddha’s awakening, and participates in the enlightened reality that it depicts."[20]

Kaidan

[edit]

Nichiren discusses the ordination platform (kaidan 戒壇) or place of worship, less frequently than the other great secret Dharmas for the mappō era. Teachings on it can be found in theSandai hi hō honjōji, a work of questionable authenticity.[20] Traditionally, a kaidan is a place where theBuddhist precepts are transmitted tonovices. However, Nichiren held that the merit of the precepts was already contained within the daimoku, and that embracing theLotus Sutra was the only true precept in the Final Dharma Age. Nichiren's intentions for the establishment of an "ordination platform of the origin teaching" (honmon no kaidan 本門の戒壇) is thus far from clear, though he seems to have held that it would supersede the Tendai ordination platform onMount Hiei. TheSandai hi hō honjōji teaches that it will be built as great Dharma center for all the people of the world once theEmperor and his government all embraced theLotus Sutra.[20]

Nichiren left the fulfillment of thekaidan to his successors and its interpretation has been a matter of heated debate. Some state that it refers to the construction of a physical ordination platform sanctioned by the Emperor; others contend that the ordination platform is the community of believers (sangha) or, simply, the place where practitioners of theLotus Sutra live and make collective efforts to realize the ideal of establishing the true Dharma in order to establish peace to the land (risshō ankoku). The latter metaphorical interpretation is based on theLotus Sūtra itself which states that "the place of enlightenment" is any place where one upholds the sutra. The latter conception reflects Nichiren's understanding that Buddhist practice must be grounded in a concrete place and must be engaged with the real world outside of temples and hermitages.[20] It has also been interpreted as promoting engagement with the secular world as well as working to improve society.[20][122]: 266, 268 [123]

Propagating theLotus Sutra far and wide

[edit]

Nichiren's teachings are replete with practical aspirations for self-transformation. He urged his followers to "quickly reform the tenets you hold in your heart" (Risshō Ankoku Ron), and to reflect on their behavior as human beings.[134]: 76, 79–80, 86, 89 [135] Nichiren also made a "great vow" that he and all his followers would create the conditions for a peacefulDharmic nation. This is described in theLotus Sutra askosen-rufu (lit. "to extensively declare and spread [theLotus Sutra] far and wide"). In earlier Japanese Buddhism the concept of "nation" was equated withImperial rule and peace with political stability. Nichiren's teachings embraced a new view which held that "nation" referred to the land and the people. Nichiren was unique among his contemporaries in charging the actual government in power (thebakufu), as responsible for peace and for the thriving of Dharma. For Nichiren, all human beings were equal in the eyes of the Buddha and all were responsible for the state of their nation. Furthermore, enlightenment is not restricted to one's inner life, but is actualized by making efforts toward the transformation of nation and society.[136]: 313–320 

Because of this, Nichiren saw himself as responsible for saving the Japanese nation, which he believed could only be accomplished by spreading the teaching of theLotus Sutra.[20] Nichiren saw his struggles to spread theLotus as reflecting and re-enacting the efforts of thebodhisattvas which appear in theLotus Sutra, mainlySadāparibhūta andViśiṣṭacāritra. He constantly enjoined his followers to continue to spread the teaching of theLotus and to keep working to create aPure Land in this world in the future.[20][41]: 66–69 [136]: 320–321 

Polemics and shakubuku

[edit]

The tradition of Buddhist debate has deep-seated roots in the Buddhist tradition, going all the way back to Indian works on debate andSiddhanta texts.[137][138][139][140] In addition to formalized religious debates, theKamakura period was marked by flourishing and competitive oral religious discourse. Temples competed for the patronage of elites through oratorical sermonizing and temple lecturers (kōshi) faced pressure to attract crowds. Sermonizing spread from within the confines of temples to homes and the streets as wandering mendicants (shidōso,hijiri, orinja) preached to both the educated and illiterate in exchange for alms. In order to teach principles of faith preachers incorporated colorful storytelling, music, vaudeville, and drama—which later evolved intoNoh.[30]: 48–49 

A predominant topic of debate in Kamakura Buddhism was the concept of rebuking "slander of the Dharma", a topic found in theLotus Sutra.[36]: 114–115  Polemical critiques of other sects could be found in the works of numerous Kamakura period authors.[36]: 116, 120 Hōnen had taught people to "discard" (,sha), "close" (,hei), "put aside" (,kaku), and "abandon" (,) all non-Pure Land teachings and his followers often took this to radical extremes. His ideas were vociferously attacked by many authors includingMyōe andJōkei.[141] Thus, Nichiren's critiques of other sects must be understood in the context of a time in which religiouspolemics were common.[36]: 116, 120  Nichiren himself saw countering slander of the Dharma as a key pillar of Buddhist practice.[36]: 114, 145–146 

At age 32, Nichiren began a career of denouncing severalMahayana schools of his time and declaring what he asserted was the correct teaching.[142][143] The first target of his polemics wasHōnen's Pure Land teaching which had by now become very popular. Nichiren's detailed rationale is most famously articulated in his first major work, theOn Establishing the Correct Teaching for the Peace of the Land (立正安国論,Risshō Ankoku Ron[63]).[note 1][144][145] While Nichiren's polemics were often harsh, he always chose personal or written debate and did not resort toreligious violence. Nichiren remained non-violent even while experiencing persecution and living in a world in which established sects like theTendai school wielded armies of warrior monks (Sōhei) to attack their critics. Nichiren is said to have stated: "Whatever obstacles I may encounter, as long as men [persons] of wisdom do not prove my teachings to be false, I will never yield."[134]: 86–87 

For Nichiren,Buddhist texts discuss to main approaches to spreading theBuddhadharma: the gradual method of shōju (摂 受) in which one leads others without confronting or challenging them, and shakubuku (折伏), an assertive method of critiquing others' views. Nichiren held that depending on the time and place, one could use either of these.[20] Nichiren believed that since Japan was a Buddhist country that had entered the Final Dharma Age in which people were discarding theLotus Sutra, it was necessary to make use of confrontational shakubuku when encountering certain people.[20] Nichiren saw his critiques as a compassionate act, since he was convinced only theLotus could lead to liberation in this age. Even if people rejected his teachings, Nichiren held that hearing about theLotus Sutra would plant a seed in their minds which would sprout in the future.[20] However, he also acknowledged that in some cases, one should also rely on shōju, even during this time. One example was when teaching in a non-buddhist country.[20] This flexibility opened the way for later controversy in the Nichiren tradition, which has often been divided over which approach to employ.[20]

The Four Denunciations

[edit]

Throughout his career Nichiren harshly denounced various Buddhist traditions, as well as the existing social and political system that supported them.[146] Modern detractors criticize his exclusivist perspective asintolerant. Apologists argue his arguments should be understood in the context of his times and not through a modern lens that rejects religious confrontation.[147]

Nichiren's polemics included sharp criticisms of the Pure Land,Shingon (meaningEsoteric Buddhism in general),Zen, andRitsu schools. The core of Nichiren's critique was that these schools had turned people away from theLotus Sutra, making them focus on other thing like a postmortem destination (Pure Land), secret and elitist master disciple transmissions (Zen, and Esotericism) andmonastic rules (Ritsu). His criticisms have become known as the "Four Denunciations". He also critiqued the Japanese Tendai school for its appropriation of esoteric elements (Taimitsu). Reliance on esoteric rituals, he claimed, was useless magic and would lead to national decay. He held that Zen was devilish in its belief that attaining enlightenment was possible through a "secret transmission outside the scriptures", and that Ritsu was thievery because it hid behind token deeds such as public works. In modern parlance, the Four Denunciations rebuked demoralized and disengaged people by discouragingoccultism,clericalism,legalism, andescapism.[41]: 8–11 [148][149]

In spite of his critiques, Nichiren did not reject all other Buddhist traditions or practices in full. His focus remained on those whom he saw as "slandering the Dharma", i.e. those who turned people away from theLotus Sutra or argued that it was a sutra of a lower class. Thus, he writes inTheOpening of the Eyes:

I believe that the devotees and followers of theFlower Garland,Meditation,Mahāvairochana, and other sutras will undoubtedly be protected by the Buddhas, bodhisattvas, and heavenly beings of the respective sutras that they uphold. But if the votaries of theMahāvairochana, Meditation, and other sutras should set themselves up as the enemies of the votary of theLotus Sutra, then the Buddhas, bodhisattvas, and heavenly beings will abandon them and will protect the votary of theLotus Sutra. It is like the case of a filial son whose father opposes the ruler of the kingdom. The son will abandon his father and support the ruler, for to do so is the height of filial piety.[150]

Bodily reading theLotus Sutra

[edit]
Nichiren in exile on Sado. Nichiren believed that the sufferings of exile allowed him to live and practice theLotus Sutra every moment of every day with his very body.[151]

Nichiren's combative preaching led to many attacks and persecutions against him and his followers. Nichiren saw these attacks as signifying his role as a "votary of the Lotus Sutra" (法華経の行者,Hokekyō no gyōja), one who bears witness to the truth of the sutra through their own life and is thus assured of enlightenment. TheLotus Sutra states that those who base themselves on its teachings and attempt to spread it will experience many trials and personal attacks. By persevering in this, they will eventually reach Buddhahood. Nichiren claimed to be "reading [theLotus Sutra] with his body" (shikidoku 色読), that is directly and physically experiencing the words of the sutra instead of just reciting or thinking about it.[152]: 35–36  Stone writes that this process entails a circular hermeneutic in which "the sūtra’s predictions that its devotees will encounter hardships legitimated Nichiren’s actions, and Nichiren’s experience of persecution, in fulfilling scriptural prophecy, legitimated theLotus Sūtra."[20]

Nichiren saw it as his personal mission to actively face these trials, and claimed he found great meaning and joy in them. He even expressed appreciation to his tormentors for giving him the opportunity to serve as an envoy of the Buddha.[153]: 34, 36  Furthermore, for Nichiren, experiencing trials and even death in service to theLotus Sutra was also a way to attain Buddhahood.[154] This practice of "bodily reading" the sutra and "not begrudging bodily life" is one of the most central elements of Nichiren's soteriology. Nichiren found this teaching in theLotus Sutra's statement "we do not value bodily life, but cherish only the unexcelled way."[151]

Nichiren also saw his sufferings as redemptive opportunities to quickly transform hiskarma and repay his debts to the triple gem, to one's parents, nation, and to all of beings.[20][152]: 37  He further held that encountering great trials for the sake of theLotus guaranteed one's future Buddhahood, and he compared this to the radical acts of self-sacrifice found in the Mahayana sutras. His personal example has provided enduring encouragement to Nichiren Buddhists as well as to other individuals who have risked their lives to uphold their convictions.[20]

Nichiren was well aware of the struggles his followers faced in their lives. He taught them that facing these challenges would lead to a sense of inner freedom, peace of mind, and to an understanding of the Dharma. Nichiren accepted the classic Buddhist views on karma which taught that a person's current conditions were the cumulative effect of past thoughts, words, and actions. However, he preferred to focus on how all people, even the ignorant, poor and evil, could become Buddhas through devotion to theLotus Sutra.[152]: 30–32  Nichiren thus taught that when confronting difficult karmic situations, chanting of the daimoku would open the wisdom of the Buddha and transform one's karma, awakening a universal concern for one's society.[155]: 168  In some of his letters, Nichiren extended his theory of facing persecution for theLotus Sutra to personal problems like familial discord or illness. He encouraged his followers to take ownership of negative life events, and to view them as opportunities to repay karmic debts and to practice Dharma, which help could shorten the length of these events.[153]: 37 

For Nichiren, finding joy in experiencing theLotus Sutra through one's personal life experience was of paramount in importance. Nichiren held that peace of mind in the face of life's challenges is precisely what the Lotus Sutra meant by its statement that those to uphold the sutra will have peace and security. According to Stone, Nichiren "demonstrated an attitude that wastes little energy in railing against it but unflinchingly embraces it, interpreting it in whatever way appears meaningful at the moment so as to use that suffering for one's own development and to offer it on behalf of others."[153]: 39 

The non-dual Lotus Land

[edit]
Nichiren chanting for fishermen at Ishiwa River, byUtagawa Kuniyoshi (歌川国芳).

Nichiren defends a profoundnonduality between subjective existence and the surrounding world, the non-separation of subjective experience and environmental karmic effects (eshō funi, 依正不二). According to this doctrine, the environment reflects the inner life-condition of the sentient beings who inhabit it. Thus, the same world appears differently to individuals based on their state of mind: a person in a state of hellish suffering experiences a hell-like world, while an awakened being experiences a Pure Land. This teaching was not limited to internal realization; it implied that sincere Buddhist practice would directly affect the external world. Because each of the Ten Realms interpenetrates and includes both sentient beings and their environments, the act of actualizing Buddhahood within oneself simultaneously actualizes Buddhahood in one’s surroundings. As more individuals engage in the chanting practice, the transformation would extend outward, gradually turning this world into an idealBuddha-field.[20]

Nichiren envisioned this transformed world as a tangible outcome of faith and practice, though he rarely detailed its specific characteristics. However, in one writing, he claims that if everyone chanted in unison, natural disasters would cease, social harmony would prevail, and people would gain long lives. This suggests that through faith in theLotus Sutra, a society in alignment with nature and moral governance could be established. This vision imbues Nichiren’s doctrine with a clear social dimension: the realization of the Pure Land is not solely an individual spiritual goal but a communal one. His followers across history have pursued this aim in various forms, inspired by the belief that practice can reform society. Nichiren's this-worldly orientation stands in contrast to thePure Land Buddhism ideal prevalent in his time, which encouraged rejection of this impure world in favor of rebirth in a transcendent land after death.[20]

The Assembly in Space Above Vulture Peak; from an illustratedLotus Sutra, c. 1257.

In his later years, Nichiren did address the question of the devotee’s destiny after death. He taught that anyone who embraced theLotus Sutra and had faith in it would enter the "Pure Land ofVulture Peak" (Ryōzen jōdō, 霊山浄土), associated with theLotus Sutra's assembly in the air. This provided a peaceful postmortem destination for Nichiren's followers, analogous to the pure land ofSukhavati.[156] However, Nichiren did not regard this Pure Land as realm separate from this world. Even though it encompasses the faithful deceased, this land is ultimately the sacred space of enlightenment accessible here and now through devotion to theLotus Sūtra. It is thus the "land of tranquil light" (jō jakkōdo), the highest Pure Land in the Tendai system.[20][156] For Nichiren, the boundary between the mundane and the sacred collapses in the moment of embracing theLotus. By chantingNamu Myōhō Renge Kyō, "gains entrance by faith" into the Buddha's presence, participating in the "eternal assembly in open space" (kokūe no gishiki) of theLotus Sutra, where Shakyamuni andMany Jewels Buddha teach from the Jeweled Stupa.[20][156]

Thus, Nichiren says in hisKanjin no Honzon-shō:

Thesahā world of the present moment (ima), which is the original time (honji) [of the Buddha’s enlightenment], is the constantly abiding pure land, liberated from the three disasters and beyond [the cycle of] the four kalpas [formation, stability, decline and extinction]. Its Buddha has not already entered nirvāṇa in the past, nor is he yet to be born in the future. And his disciples are of the same essence. This [world] is [implicit in] the three realms, which are inherent in the three thousand realms of one’s mind.[156]

Thus, through faith and the daimoku, one can enter the Pure Land in this life, which is equivalent to "attaining buddhahood in this body" (sokushin jōbutsu).[156] Therefore, unlike with the Pure Land teaching of Sukhavati, Nichiren's idea of the Pure Land is not a world outside ofSaṃsāra and does not require one to loathe this defiled world and seek to escape it.[156] Nichiren writes:

The originally enlightened Buddha of the perfect teaching abides in this world. If one abandons this land, toward what other land should one aspire? . . . The practitioner who believes in theLotus andNirvana sutras should not seek another place, for wherever one has faith in this sutra is precisely the pure land. . . . . For people of our day, who have not yet formed a bond with theLotus Sutra, to aspire to theWestern Pure Land is to aspire to a land of rubble.[131]

Equality

[edit]

Nichiren taught that all beings had the same capacity to attain Buddhahood. He held that theLotus Sutra teaches the equality of all beings.[157] He also taught that neither social class nor gender were barriers to one's Buddhahood. This view was rare in Japan, which was a society dominated by elite men. Women were not even allowed onMount Hiei for example, and were traditionally considered to be impure during menstruation.[158] Nichiren emphasized that women are equal in their spiritual capacity:

Many women in their prime became nuns during Shakyamuni's time and practiced the way of the Buddha, but they were never despised because of their menstrual periods. Menstruation is not a pollution that comes from without. It is simply a feminine characteristic...[158]

Nichiren and his followers

[edit]
Nichiren in his later years and his disciples. From the book JIGAGE E SHŌ ZOKUHEN (1818, Kyoto).

Nichiren was a charismatic leader who attracted many followers during both his missionary trips and his exiles. They includedsamurai, feudal lords, commoners and merchants, men and women. He taught his followers that women were equally able to attain enlightenment. He wrote to them often, sharing his rationale and strategies with them, openly urging them to share his conviction and struggles.[159][13]: 328–329 

Nichiren's many extant letters demonstrate the scope and breadth of his relationship with them and his expectations for them. They recognized and trusted his charismatic leadership and his understanding of Buddhism. Many sought his guidance to overcome personal problems. Many were actively involved with supporting him financially and protecting his community of followers. Several of disciples were praised by him for sharing in his privations and a few lost their lives in these situations. The relationship between Nichiren and his disciples has been calledshitei funi, the oneness of mentor and disciple. Although the functions of the mentor and disciple may vary, they share the same goals and the same responsibility. Nichiren claimed the precedent forshitei funi is a core theme of theLotus Sutra, especially in chapters 21 and 22 where the Buddha entrusts the future propagation of the sutra to the gathered bodhisattvas.[160][161][162]

Posthumous influence

[edit]
The statue of Nichiren atChōshō-ji inKamakura

In the centuries after his death, theNichiren movement experienced many internal divisions and further persecutions. Nevertheless, Nichiren's Lotus (Hokke) tradition grew steadily and maintained Nichiren's teachings. In the years after his death, Nichiren's teachings were interpreted in different ways by his followers. As a result, Nichiren Buddhism encompasses several major branches and schools, each with its own doctrine and set of interpretations of Nichiren's teachings.[163] Today his followers are found in influential lay movements as well as traditional Nichiren schools likeNichiren-shū andNichiren Shōshū.[164][165] With an estimated 10 millions followers, modernNichiren Buddhism is the second largest tradition ofJapanese Buddhism (second only toPure Land Buddhism with 22 million followers).[166]

A massive body of scholarship on Nichiren has been written in Japanese. This includes sectarian and academic works. The Institute of Nichiren Buddhist Studies atRisshō University (Risshō Daigaku Nichiren Kyōgaku Kenkyūjo 立正大 学日蓮教学硏究所) is a major Japanese institution which focuses on Nichiren studies. It is affiliated withNichiren-shū.[20] Nichiren has drawn less attention from Western scholars than other Japanese Buddhist figures, and he was initially stereotyped as intolerant or militant. Nevertheless, scholars like Gaston Renondeau, Alicia Matsunaga, Daigan Matsunaga, Bruno Petzold, Lucia Dolce andJacqueline Stone have written in English on Nichiren.[20]

Writings

[edit]
A section of Nichiren's treatise Risshō Ankoku Ron (On Establishing the Correct Teaching for the Peace of the Land)

Nichiren was a prolific writer. His collected works in four volumes contains up to five hundred writings.[20] Nichiren also kept a copy of theLotus Sūtra which he annotated profusely and has also been published.[20] Many writings still exist in his original handwriting, some as complete works and some as fragments. Other documents survive as copies made by his immediate disciples. Nichiren's existing works number over 700manuscripts in total, including transcriptions of orally delivered lectures, letters of remonstration and illustrations.[167][168][169][170][171] According to Fumihiko Sueki: "the most rigorously edited and reliable collection of Nichiren’s writings is theShōwa teihon Nichiren Shōnin ibun 昭和定本日蓮聖人遺文 (STN), edited and published after World War II by Risshō Daigaku Nichiren Kyōgaku Kenkyūjo (1988)."[122]

Scholars have divided the writings attributed to Nichiren into three categories: those whose authenticity are universally accepted, those generally designated as written by someone else after his death, and a third category in which the veracity of works is still being debated.[172][122]

In addition to treatises written in formalClassical Chinese (漢文,kanbun), Nichiren also wrote expositories and letters to followers in mixedkanji-kana vernacular as well as letters in simplifiedkana for believers such as children who could not read the more formal styles. Some of Nichiren'skanbun works, especially theRisshō Ankoku Ron, are considered exemplary of thekanbun style, while many of his letters focus on more empathic exhortations to commoners and laypeople.[173]

Selected important writings

[edit]

Among his main Classical Chinese treatises, five are generally accepted by all Nichiren schools as his major works:[174][175][176]

  • On Securing the Peace of the Land through the Propagation of True Buddhism (Rissho Ankoku Ron) — written between 1258 and 1260.[177]
  • The Opening of the Eyes (Kaimoku-sho) — written in 1272.
  • The True Object of Worship (Kanjin-no Honzon-sho) — written in 1273.
  • The Selection of the Time (Senji-sho) — written in 1275.
  • On Repaying Debts of Gratitude (Ho'on-sho) — written in 1276.

Nikkō Shōnin added an additional five writings to comprise a set of ten major writings (this specific list is only central inNichiren Shōshū).[176][178]

  • On Chanting the Daimoku of the Lotus Sutra (Sho-hokke Daimoku-sho) — written in 1260.
  • On Taking the Essence of the Lotus Sutra (Hokke Shuyo-sho) — written in 1274.
  • On the Four Stages of Faith and the Five Stages of Practice (Shishin Gohon-sho) — written in 1277.
  • Letter to Shimoyama (Shimoyama Gosho-soku) — written in 1277.
  • Questions and Answers on the Object of Worship (Honzon Mondo-sho) — written in 1278.

Personal letters

[edit]

Among the collection of his extant writings are numerous letters to his follows in the form of thank you notes, messages of condolence, responses to questions, and spiritual counseling for trying moments in his followers' lives. Collectively these letters demonstrate that Nichiren was a master of providing both comfort and challenge befitting the unique personalities and situations of each individual.[21]: 102 [30]: 52 

Many of these letters use tales drawn from Indian, Chinese, and Japanese traditions as well as historical anecdotes and stories from the Buddhist canon. Nichiren incorporated several hundred of these anecdotes and took liberty to freely embellish some of them; a few of the stories he provided do not appear in other collections and could be original.[30]: 47–50 [179]

Another category of his letters follow the genres of Japanesezuihitsu, lyrical and loosely organized essays that combine personal reflection and poetic language, or personal diaries (nikki bungaku). Nichiren was a master of this genre and these colloquial works reveal his highly personal and charismatic method of proselytization as well as his deep caring for his followers.[30]: 47–50, 52 

Nichiren used his letters as a means to inspire key supporters. About one hundred followers are identified as recipients and several received between 5 and 20 of them. The recipients tended to be of the warrior class and only scattered references appear about his lower status followers, many of whom were illiterate. The series of letters he wrote his followers during the "Atsuhara Affair" of 1279 provide a case study of how he used personal written communications to direct a response to the government's actions and to keep his followers steadfast during the ordeal.[30]: 55n [82]: 156n, 158 

Writings to women

[edit]

Against a backdrop of earlier Buddhist teachings that deny the possibility of enlightenment to women or reserve that possibility for life after death, Nichiren is highly sympathetic to women. Based on various passages from theLotus Sutra, Nichiren asserts that "Other sutras are written for men only. This sutra is for everyone."[180][181][182]

Ninety of his extant letters, nearly a fifth of the total, were addressed to female correspondents.[183]Nichiren Shu has published separate volumes with those writings.[184] In these letters Nichiren plays particular attention to the instantaneous attainment of enlightenment of theDragon King's daughter in the "Devadatta" (Twelfth) chapter of theLotus Sutra and displays deep concern for the fears and worries of his female disciples.[185][186]

Disputed writings

[edit]

There is a lively scholarly debate as to the authenticity of many writings attributed to Nichiren. Such disputed works include theSandai hihō honjōji and theOngi kuden.[20] Some Japanese scholars initially questioned whether any work which containedhongaku thought could be Nichiren's. These include important writings sent to the Tendai monk Sairen-bo which also show some stylistic differences to other writings by Nichiren.[122] More recent scholarship by authors like Jacqueline Stone have argued that this single criterion is not enough for rejecting a work's authenticity.[122] Thus, according to Sueki, the authenticity of theRisshōkan jō (Treatise on right contemplation) is highly probable.[122] In 1997, Ito Zuiei used computer analysis to study theSandai hihō honjōji and argued that it is possibly authentic. Thus, the scholarship on Nichiren's "problematic" works is still up for debate and continues to change.[122]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^abAlso translated as "On Establishing the Correct Teaching for the Peace of the Land" (The Writings of Nichiren), "Establishment of the Legitimate Teaching for the Protection of the Country" (Selected Writings of Nichiren), and others.
  2. ^"please build my grave on Mount Minobu, because that is where is where I spent nine years reciting the Lotus Sutra to my heart's content. My heart lives forever on Mount Minobu"[91]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Yamamine, Jun (1952).Nichiren Daishōnin to sono oshie: Nichiren and his doctrine. Kōfukan, University of Michigan.
  2. ^Tōkyō Kokuritsu Hakubutsukan (2003).Dai Nichiren ten: rikkyō kaishū 750-nen kinen. Sankei Shinbunsha.OCLC 52227561.
  3. ^大日蓮出版.日蓮正宗の専門書を扱う大日蓮出版. Dainichiren Publishing Co., Ltd. 2013.Archived from the original on 23 June 2018. Retrieved22 June 2018.
  4. ^"Daishonin".The Soka Gakkai Dictionary of Buddhism.Archived from the original on 24 October 2017. Retrieved11 September 2018.
  5. ^abcNichiren (1990). Yampolsky, Philip B. (ed.).Selected writings of Nichiren. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 456.ISBN 0-231-07260-0.OCLC 21035153.
  6. ^Petzold, Bruno; Hanayama, Shinshō (1995). Ichimura, Shōhei (ed.).The classification of Buddhism = Bukkyō kyōhan: comprising the classification of Buddhist doctrines in India, China and Japan 1873–1949. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.ISBN 3-447-03373-8.OCLC 34220855.
  7. ^Bloom, Alfred."Understanding the Social and Religious Meaning of Nichiren".Shin DharmaNet.Archived from the original on 11 September 2018. Retrieved11 September 2018.
  8. ^abcdefghStone, Jacqueline I. (1999)."REVIEW ARTICLE: Biographical Studies of Nichiren"(PDF).Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 26/3–4.Archived(PDF) from the original on 28 March 2016. Retrieved14 September 2018.
  9. ^NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute, ed. (24 May 2016).NHK日本語発音アクセント新辞典 (in Japanese). NHK Publishing.
  10. ^abcdefgLopez, Donald S. Jr. (2016).The Lotus Sūtra: A Biography. Princeton University Press.ISBN 978-1-4008-8334-9.OCLC 959534116.Among all of the preachers of the dharma of the Lotus Sutra over the past two thousand years, there has been no one like Nichiren. In the long history of the sutra in Japan, he is the most famous—and the most infamous.
  11. ^abRodd, Laurel Rasplica (1978).Nichiren: A Biography. Arizona State University.ISBN 978-0-939252-07-7.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  12. ^H. Byron Earhart (31 October 2013)."Value Creation Society (Sōka Gakkai)". InHuffman, James L. (ed.).Modern Japan: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Nationalism. Routledge. p. 281.ISBN 978-1-135-63490-2.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved1 December 2020.Buddhism and the state have always been closely allied in Japan. Nichiren insisted, however, that theLotus Sutra was the only true Buddhism, that the state should support only this form of Buddhism, and that it should abolish all other Buddhist sects as heretical.
  13. ^abcdefRodd, Laurel Rasplica (1995). Ian Philip, McGreal (ed.).Great Thinkers of the Eastern World: The Majori Thinkers and the Philosophical and Religious Classics of China, India, Japan, Korea, and the World of Islam (1st ed.). New York: HarperCollins Publishers. p. 327.ISBN 0-06-270085-5.OCLC 30623569.
  14. ^Jack Arden Christensen, Nichiren: Leader of Buddhist Reformation in Japan, Jain Publishing, p. 48,ISBN 0-87573-086-8.
  15. ^Stone, Jacqueline (Spring 2006). "The Final Word: An Interview with Jacqueline Stone".Tricycle.
  16. ^Stone, Jaqueline (2003). "Nichiren". In Buswell, Robert E. (ed.).Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Vol. II. New York: Macmillan Reference Library. p. 594.ISBN 0-02-865718-7.
  17. ^Shuxian Liu; Robert Elliott Allinson (1988).Harmony and Strife: Contemporary Perspectives, East & West. The Chinese University Press.ISBN 962-201-412-7.
  18. ^ab"Nichiren Buddhism".About.com. Archived fromthe original on 18 November 2012. Retrieved21 September 2012.
  19. ^Habito, Ruben L. F. (2005). "Altruism in Japanese Religions: The Case of Nichiren Buddhism". In Neusner, Jacob; Chilton, Bruce (eds.).Altruism in World Religions. Georgetown University Press. pp. 141–143.ISBN 1-58901-235-6.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  20. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacadaeafagahaiajakalamanaoapaqarasatauavawaxayazbabbbcbdbebfbgbhbibjbkblbmbnStone, Jacqueline (29 May 2020),"Nichiren",Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion,doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.575,ISBN 978-0-19-934037-8, retrieved10 April 2025.
  21. ^abIida, Shotara (1987). "Nichiren 700 Years Later". In W., Nicholls (ed.).Modernity and Religion. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.ISBN 978-0-88920-154-5.OCLC 244765387.
  22. ^Writings of Nichiren Shonin: Doctrine 1. University of Hawaii Press. 2003. p. 285.ISBN 978-0-8248-2733-5.Realizing himself to be an avatar of Jōgyō Boddhisattva, Nichiren strived to spread theLotus Sutra.
  23. ^Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. International Institute for the Study of Religions. 1994. p. 314.TheLotus Sutra states that this person would be a reincarnation of Jogyo bosatsu, a status that Nichiren did, in fact, claim for himself on numerous occasions.
  24. ^Matsunaga, Daigan.; Matsunage, Alicia (1974).Foundation of Japanese Buddhism. Los Angeles: Buddhist Books International. p. 156.ISBN 0-914910-25-6.OCLC 1121328.
  25. ^Eliot, Charles (1993) [1935]. Sansom, George Bailey (ed.).Japanese Buddhism 1862–1931. Richmond, Surrey, UK: Curzon Press. p. 421.ISBN 0-7007-0263-6.OCLC 28567705.
  26. ^Neusner, Jacob, ed. (2009).World Religions in America: An Introduction (4th ed.). Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press. p. 225.ISBN 978-1-61164-047-2.OCLC 810933354.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  27. ^"Original Buddha".Nichiren Buddhism Library. Soka Gakkai.Archived from the original on 21 December 2017. Retrieved20 June 2018.
  28. ^"True Buddha".Nichiren Buddhism Library. Soka Gakkai.Archived from the original on 21 December 2017. Retrieved20 June 2018.
  29. ^"Latter Day of the Law".Nichiren Buddhism Library. Soka Gakkai.Archived from the original on 21 April 2017. Retrieved20 June 2018.
  30. ^abcdefghijklmRodd, Laurel Rasplica (1980).Nichiren: Selected Writings. [Honolulu]: University Press of Hawaii.ISBN 0-8248-0682-4.OCLC 5170843.
  31. ^"Kuniyoshi Project". Kuniyoshi Project.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved29 April 2022.
  32. ^Gerhart, Karen M. (2009).The material culture of death in medieval Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. p. 115.ISBN 978-1-4416-7117-2.OCLC 663882756.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  33. ^Kinyabara, T.J. (1913).Nichiren Tradition in Pictures. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company. pp. 344–350.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  34. ^Bowring, Richard; Bowring, Professor Emeritus of Japanese Studies Richard (15 September 2005).The Religious Traditions of Japan 500–1600. Cambridge University Press. p. 334.ISBN 978-0-521-85119-0.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  35. ^Fremerman, Sarah."Letters of Nichiren".Tricycle: The Buddhist Review.Archived from the original on 18 September 2018. Retrieved18 September 2018.
  36. ^abcdefgStone, Jacqueline I (2012)."The Sin of Slandering the True Dharma in Nichiren's Thought"(PDF).Sins and Sinners: Perspectives from Asian Religions. Granoff, P. E., Shinohara, Koichi. Leiden: Brill.ISBN 978-90-04-23200-6.OCLC 809194690.Archived(PDF) from the original on 13 November 2021. Retrieved24 September 2018.
  37. ^Habito, Ruben L.F. (1999)."The Uses of Nichiren in Modern Japanese History".Japanese Journal of Religious History. 26:3–4: 438.Archived from the original on 4 July 2018. Retrieved21 October 2018 – via Nanzan Institute.
  38. ^See, Tony (2015). "Nichiren and War".Conflict and harmony in comparative philosophy: selected works from the 2013 Joint Meeting of the Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy and the Australasian Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy. Creller, Aaron B. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 152.ISBN 978-1-4438-8125-8.OCLC 922704088.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  39. ^"Faith in Revolution".Tricycle Magazine. Winter 2008.
  40. ^abKing, Sallie B. (1996). "Conclusion: Buddhist Social Activism".Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia. Queen, Christopher S and King, Sallie B. (eds.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. p. 430.ISBN 0-7914-2844-3.Nichiren, of course, it is possibly the most outstanding exemplar of the prophetic voice in the entire Buddhist tradition. His fiery denunciations of both the religious and the political status quo of this time and his dogged insistence upon their total displacement earned him the hatred of the powerful and the love of the common people.
  41. ^abcdefghijAnesaki, Masaharu (1916).Nichiren: The Buddhist Prophet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  42. ^abHarvey, Peter (2013).An introduction to Buddhism: teachings, history and practices (Second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-85942-4.OCLC 822518354.
  43. ^"Nichiren Buddhism".BBC.Archived from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved24 September 2018.
  44. ^Howes, John (2005).Japan's modern prophet: Uchimura Kanzō, 1861–1930. Vancouver: UBC Press. p. 111.ISBN 0-7748-1145-5.OCLC 60670210.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved24 September 2018.Uchimura compares him to Luther on two counts. The first is his concern over the wrongs of the religious establishment, and the second is his adoption of a single book as the source of his faith. He depended on the Lotus Sutra, Uchimura begins, much as Luther relied on the Bible....In sum, Nichiren was 'a soul sincere to its very core, the honestest of men, the bravest of Japanese.'
  45. ^Obuse, Kieko (2010).Doctrinal Accommodations in Buddhist-Musli Relations in Japan: With Special Reference to Contemporary Japan. Oxford: University of Oxford (dissertation). pp. 177–78, 225.
  46. ^Satomi, Kishio (2007) [1924].Discovery of Japanese Idealism. Oxon: Routledge. pp. 67–77.ISBN 978-0-415-24533-3.
  47. ^"Introduction: The Life of Nichiren".Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved20 April 2021.
  48. ^Nakamura, Hajime (1968).Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples: India, China, Tibet, Japan. Wiener, Philip P. (Philip Paul), 1905–1992. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. p. 433.ISBN 0-585-34905-3.OCLC 47009998.
  49. ^ab"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006 pp, 202: Banishment to Sado". Sgilibrary.org.Archived from the original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  50. ^Broughton, B.L. (1936)."Nichiren Shonin".Maha Bodhi Society of India.44:317.
  51. ^Petzold, Bruno (1978).Buddhist Prophet Nichiren: A Lotus in the Sun. Iida, Shotaro and Simmonds, Wendy. University of Virginia, republished by Hokke Jānaru. p. 2.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved28 September 2018.
  52. ^Robert S. Ellwood, Introducing Japanese religion, Routledge,ISBN 0-415-77426-8
  53. ^Green, Paula (2000). "Walking for Peace: Nipponzan Myohoji".Engaged Buddhism in the west. Queen, Christopher S. (Ed.). Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.ISBN 978-0-86171-841-2.OCLC 844350971.
  54. ^The Gosho Translation Committee:The Writings of Nichiren, Volume I, Soka Gakkai, 2006.ISBN 4-412-01024-4, introduction p. XXV
  55. ^Jack Arden Christensen, Nichiren: Leader of Buddhist Reformation in Japan, Jain Pub, Page 44,ISBN 0-87573-086-8
  56. ^Hori, Kyotsu (1995).Nyonin Gosho: Letters Addressed to Female Followers. Nichiren-shu Overseas Propagation Promotion Association. p. 182.
  57. ^Paolo del Campana, Pier."Nichiren: Japanese Buddhist monk".Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved3 October 2018.
  58. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacadaeafagahaiStone, Jacqueline I. (2003).Original Enlightenment and the Transformation of Medieval Japanese Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. pp. 252–256.ISBN 0-8248-2771-6.OCLC 53002138.
  59. ^Khoon Choy Lee, Japan: Between Myth and Reality, World Scientific Pub Co, page 104,ISBN 981-02-1865-6
  60. ^De Bary, William Theodore (1964).Sources of Japanese tradition. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 215.ISBN 0-231-08605-9.OCLC 644425.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  61. ^Deal, William; Ruppert, Brian Douglas (31 March 2015).A cultural history of Japanese Buddhism. Chichester, West Sussex, UK.ISBN 978-1-118-60831-9.OCLC 904194715.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  62. ^abMurano, Senchu (2003).Two Nichiren Texts(PDF). Berkeley, CA: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research. pp. 9–52.ISBN 1-886439-17-6. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 22 March 2015. Retrieved20 August 2014.
  63. ^ab"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006 pp, 6–32: On Establishing the Correct Teaching for the Peace of the Land". Sgilibrary.org. Archived fromthe original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  64. ^A tract revealing the gist of the "rissho angoku-ron", Kyotsu Hori (transl.); Sakashita, Jay (ed.): Writings of Nichiren, Doctrine 1, page 163 University of Hawai'i Press, 2003,ISBN 0-8248-2733-3
  65. ^abcDeal, William E. (1999). "Nichiren's Risshō ankoku ron and Canon Formation".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies.26 (3–4):329–330.JSTOR 30233630.
  66. ^Tanabe, George J.; Tanabe, Willa J. (1989).The Lotus Sutra in Japanese culture. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. pp. 43, 49.ISBN 0-8248-1198-4.OCLC 18960211.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.Nichiren called this third realmdaisan hōmon, meaning the third sphere of 8akyamuni's teaching. The teachings in this realm of the Lotus Sutra emphasize the need to endure the trials of life and to practice the true law. In short, they advocate human activity in the real world, or bodhisattva practices. The eternal Buddha is also considered anew in this context, and it is said that Sakyamuni himself endlessly undertook bodhisattva practices. This third realm emphasizing bodhisattva practices suggests the meaning and purpose of human existence in this world.
  67. ^Tamura, Yoshirō (15 July 2014).Introduction to the Lotus Sutra. Reeves, Gene; Shinozaki, Michio. Boston. pp. 8–9, 124.ISBN 978-1-61429-099-5.OCLC 892059024.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  68. ^Kanno, Hiroshi (2007)."The Bodhisattva Way and Valuing the Real World in the Lotus Sutra"(PDF).Journal of Oriental Studies.17: 182.Archived(PDF) from the original on 7 January 2020. Retrieved8 November 2018.
  69. ^Habito, Ruben L.F. (8 November 2005). "Altruism in Japanese Religions: The Case of Nichiren Buddhism". In Neusner, Jacob; Chilton, Bruce (eds.).Altruism in World Religions. Georgetown University Press.ISBN 1-58901-235-6.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  70. ^Petzold, Bruno (1978).Buddhist Prophet Nichiren: A Lotus in the Sun. Hokke Jānaru. p. 1.Archived from the original on 3 June 2022. Retrieved13 October 2018.
  71. ^McIntire, Suzanne; Burns, William E. (25 June 2010).Speeches in World History. Infobase Publishing. p. 102.ISBN 978-1-4381-2680-7.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  72. ^"The Writings of Nichiren", p. 767
  73. ^"casting off the transient and revealing the true | Dictionary of Buddhism | Nichiren Buddhism Library". Nichirenlibrary.org.Archived from the original on 23 March 2023. Retrieved29 April 2022.
  74. ^Tanabe (2002), p. 357.
  75. ^abNichiren (2002).Writings of Nichiren Shonin: Doctrine 2. Tanabe, George. University of Hawaii Press.ISBN 978-0-8248-2551-5.Archived from the original on 10 July 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  76. ^Olson, Carl (2005).The different paths of Buddhism: a narrative-historical introduction. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. pp. 196–197.ISBN 0-8135-3778-9.OCLC 62266054.
  77. ^"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, pp. 354–382: The Object of Devotion for Observing the Mind". Sgilibrary.org. Archived fromthe original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  78. ^"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, pp. 220–298: The Opening of the Eyes". Sgilibrary.org. Archived fromthe original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  79. ^Habito, Ruben L.F. (1999)."Bodily Reading of the Lotus Sutra: Understanding Nichiren's Buddhism".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies.26 (3–4): 297.Archived from the original on 18 November 2018. Retrieved18 November 2018.
  80. ^Lopez, Donald S. (12 September 2016).The Lotus Sūtra: a biography. Princeton. p. 101.ISBN 978-1-4008-8334-9.OCLC 959534116.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  81. ^"The Way to Minobu | WND II | Nichiren Buddhism Library". Nichirenlibrary.org.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved29 April 2022.
  82. ^abStone, Jacqueline I. (2014)."The Atsuhara Affair: The Lotus Sutra, Persecution, and Religious Identity in the Early Nichiren Tradition".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies.41 (1): 165, 176.doi:10.18874/jjrs.41.1.2014.153-189.Archived from the original on 8 June 2014. Retrieved26 September 2018 – via Nanzan Institute.
  83. ^https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-1/Introduction/3#TheArchived 21 December 2017 at theWayback Machine Life of Nichiren Daishonin
  84. ^"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, pp. 538–594: The Selection of the Time". Sgilibrary.org. Archived fromthe original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  85. ^"SGI The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, pp. 41–47: The Four Debts of Gratitude". Sgilibrary.org. Archived fromthe original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  86. ^Dolce, Lucia (1999)."Criticism and Appropriation: Nichiren's Attitude toward Esoteric Buddhism".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 26/3-4.Archived from the original on 1 July 2018. Retrieved18 November 2018 – via Narzan Institute.
  87. ^Christensen, Jack Arden (2001).Nichiren: leader of Buddhist reformation in Japan. Fremont, Calif.: Jain Publishing Co.ISBN 978-0-87573-086-8.OCLC 43030590.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  88. ^Johnston, William M. (2013).Encyclopedia of Monasticism. Routledge. p. 693.ISBN 978-1-136-78716-4.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  89. ^Causton, Richard: "Buddha in Daily Life, An Introduction to the Buddhism of Nichiren", Random House 2011, p. 241ISBN 1-4464-8919-1
  90. ^Gerhart, Karen M. (2009).The Material Culture of Death in Medieval Japan. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 114–116.ISBN 978-0-8248-3261-2.Archived from the original on 3 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  91. ^Montgomery, Daniel (1991).Fire in the Lotus: The Dynamic Religion of Nichiren. London: Mandala. p. 144.ISBN 978-1-85274-091-7.
  92. ^abDolce, Lucia (1999)."Criticism and Appropriation: Nichiren's Attitude toward Esoteric Buddhism".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 26/3-4.Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved31 October 2018.
  93. ^Nichiren (2002).Writings of Nichiren Shonin: Doctrine 2. University of Hawaii Press.ISBN 978-0-8248-2551-5.Archived from the original on 6 July 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  94. ^"ten major writings | Dictionary of Buddhism | Nichiren Buddhism Library". Nichirenlibrary.org.Archived from the original on 14 December 2017. Retrieved29 April 2022.
  95. ^Strand, Clark.Waking the Buddha: How the Most Dynamic and Empowering Buddhist Movement in History Is Changing Our Concept of Religion. Santa Monica, CA. p. 182.ISBN 978-1-938252-51-8.OCLC 875894919.
  96. ^King, Sallie B. (2006). "Toward a Buddhist Theory of Social Ethics".Buddhism and Peace: Theory and Practice. Mun, Chanju., International Seminar on Buddhism and Leadership for Peace (7th: 1995: Honolulu, Hawaii). Honolulu: Blue Pine. p. 105.ISBN 978-0-9777553-1-8.OCLC 65404566.
  97. ^Magill, Frank Northen; Aves, Alison (1998).Dictionary of World Biography: The Middle Ages. Routledge. p. 667.ISBN 978-1-57958-041-4.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  98. ^abGacis, Achilles S. C. (2000).Nichiren's Nationalism: A Buddhist Rhetoric of a Shinto Teaching (Dissertation ed.). Universal-Publishers.ISBN 978-1-58112-110-0.Archived from the original on 5 January 2022. Retrieved5 January 2022.
  99. ^Record of Miraculous Events in Japan: The Nihon Ryoiki. Vol. 3. Columbia University Press. 2013. p. 131.ISBN 978-0-231-53516-8.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  100. ^abMontgomery (1991), pp. 101-102.
  101. ^Grapard, Allan G. (1998). "Keiranshuyoshu: A Different Perspective on Mt. Hiei in the Medieval Period".Re-Visioning "Kamakura" Buddhism. Payne, Richard Karl. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. pp. 57–58.ISBN 0-8248-2024-X.OCLC 38249103.
  102. ^Bocking, Brian (1997).A Popular Dictionary of Shinto (Rev. ed.). Richmond, Surrey [U.K.]: Curzon Press. p. 44.ISBN 0-7007-1051-5.OCLC 264474222.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  103. ^"Nichiren – Great Teacher Series – Theosophy Trust".theosophytrust.mobi.Archived from the original on 31 October 2018. Retrieved29 October 2018.
  104. ^Metraux, Daniel A. (1986)."The Sōka Gakkai's Search for the Realization of the World of Risshō Ankokuron".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies.13/1:38–39.Archived from the original on 21 March 2016. Retrieved20 November 2018.
  105. ^abEndō, Asai (1968) [translated 1999]."Nichiren's View of Humanity: The Final Dharma Age and the Three Thousand Realms in One Thought-Moment".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies.26 (3–4):239–240.Archived from the original on 13 December 2014. See also"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, p. 437 Rebuking Slander of the Law". Archived fromthe original on 18 March 2012. Retrieved6 September 2013 – via Sgilibrary.org.,"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, p. 736: On Repaying Debts of Gratitude". Archived fromthe original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013 – via Sgilibrary.org. and"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, p. 903: The Teaching for the Latter Day". Archived fromthe original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013 – via Sgilibrary.org.
  106. ^Nakamura, Hajime (1964).The Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples: India-China-Tibet-Japan. University of Hawaii Press. p. 396.ISBN 978-0-8248-0078-9.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  107. ^"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, p. 77: Encouragement of a Sick Person". Sgilibrary.org.Archived from the original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  108. ^Shaner, David Edward (1985).The Bodymind Experience in Japanese Buddhism: A Phenomenological Study of Kukai and Dogen. SUNY Press. pp. 75–79.ISBN 978-0-88706-061-8.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  109. ^Groner, Paul (1989)."The Lotus Sutra and Saicho's Interpretation of the Realization of Buddhahood with This Very Body". In Tanabe, George J.; Tanabe, Willa J. (eds.).The Lotus Sutra in Japanese Culture. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 56–57.ISBN 978-0-8248-1198-3.Archived from the original on 4 July 2022. Retrieved31 October 2018.
  110. ^Fowler, Merv (2015)."Ancient China".The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Humanism. Andrew Copson and A.C. Grayling. John Wiley & Sons.ISBN 978-1-119-97717-9.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  111. ^Stone 2003, p. 263.
  112. ^Stone 2003, pp. 264-263.
  113. ^Stone 2003, pp. 266.
  114. ^Kitagawa Zenchō 北川前肇,The Words of the Lotus Sutra in Nichiren’s Thought,Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 41/1: 25–43 © 2014 Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture.
  115. ^Miller, George David (2002).Peace, Value, and Wisdom: The Educational Philosophy of Daisaku Ikeda. Rodopi.ISBN 90-420-1359-1.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  116. ^Stone, Jacqueline I. (2015). "Original Enlightenment Thought in the Nichiren Tradition". In Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (ed.).Buddhism in Practice (Abridged ed.). Princeton. p. 169.ISBN 978-1-4008-8007-2.OCLC 926048981.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  117. ^Stone, Jacqueline I. (2003). "Nichiren's Activist Heirs: Soka Gakkai, Rissho Koseikai, Nipponzan Myohoji".Action Dharma: New Studies in Engaged Buddhism. Queen, Christopher S., Prebish, Charles S., Keown, Damien. London: RoutledgeCurzon. pp. 63–94.ISBN 0-7007-1593-2.OCLC 50809145.When all people throughout the land enter the one Buddha vehicle, and the Wonderful Dharma [of the Lotus] alone flourishes, because the people all chant Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō, the wind will not thrash the branches, nor the rain fall hard enough to break clods. The age will become like the reigns of [the Chinese sage kings] Yao and Shun. In the present life, inauspicious calamities will be banished, and people will obtain the art of longevity. When the principle becomes manifest that both persons and dharmas "neither age nor die," then each of you, behold! There can be no doubt of the sutra's promise of "peace and security in the present world."
  118. ^Bowring, Richard. Religious Traditions of Japan: 500–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. p. 247.
  119. ^Shaheen, James."Finding Common Ground".Tricycle: The Buddhist Review.Archived from the original on 31 October 2018. Retrieved28 October 2018.
  120. ^Strand, Clark."Faith in Revolution".Tricycle: The Buddhist Review.Archived from the original on 3 September 2018. Retrieved28 October 2018.
  121. ^abcCollinson, Diané (2000).Fifty Eastern Thinkers. Plant, Kathryn., Wilkinson, Robert. London: Routledge.ISBN 0-203-00540-6.OCLC 50493529.
  122. ^abcdefghiSueki, Fumihiko (1999)."Nichiren's Problematic Works".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 26/3-4:261–280.Archived from the original on 1 July 2018. Retrieved31 October 2018.
  123. ^abSato, Hiroo (1999)."Nichiren's View of Nation and Religion".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 26/3-4:320–321.Archived from the original on 1 July 2018. Retrieved31 October 2018.
  124. ^Bluck, Robert (2006).British Buddhism: Teachings, Practice and Development. Routledge. p. 93.ISBN 978-1-134-15817-1.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  125. ^Murata, Koichi (2014)."Makiguchi". In Phillips, D. C. (ed.).Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosophy. SAGE Publications. p. 506.ISBN 978-1-4833-6475-9.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved12 November 2018.
  126. ^Lotus Seeds: The Essence of Nichiren Shu Buddhism, San Jose Temple, p. 84.ISBN 0-9705920-0-0.
  127. ^"The Soka Gakkai Dictionary of Buddhism 2002: three proofs". Sgilibrary.org. Archived fromthe original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  128. ^Ingram, Paul O. (1977). "Nichirin's Three Secrets".Numen.24 (3): 215.doi:10.2307/3269599.JSTOR 3269599.
  129. ^abMontgomery 1991, p. 132.
  130. ^Fujii, Kyōkō.The Meaning of the Practice of Chanting in Nichiren Buddhism. Journal of East Asian Cultures 2023/2: VII–XIV.http://doi.org/10.38144/TKT.2023.2.1.https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2613-7519.
  131. ^abStone 2003, p. 247.
  132. ^"The Real Aspect of the Gohonzon".Nichiren Buddhism Library. Soka Gakkai.Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved20 July 2018.
  133. ^Montgomery 1991, pp. 132-133.
  134. ^abUrbain, Olivier (2010).Daisaku Ikeda's Philosophy of Peace: Dialogue, Transformation and Global Citizenship. London: I.B. Tauris.ISBN 978-1-4416-9789-9.OCLC 742349088.
  135. ^Tong, Chee-Kiong (2007).Rationalizing Religion: Religious Conversion, Revivalism and Competition in Singapore Society. BRILL. pp. 138–140.ISBN 978-90-474-1969-3.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  136. ^abSato, Hiroo (1999)."Nichiren's View of Nation and Religion".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 26/3-4. Habito, Ruben:307–323.Archived from the original on 1 July 2018. Retrieved4 December 2018.
  137. ^Lempert, Michael (30 April 2012).Discipline and Debate: The Language of Violence in a Tibetan Buddhist Monastery. University of California Press. p. 47.ISBN 978-0-520-26946-0.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  138. ^Mollier, Christine (2008).Buddhism and Taoism Face to Face: Scripture, Ritual, and Iconographic Exchange in Medieval China. University of Hawaii Press. p. 15.ISBN 978-0-8248-3169-1.Archived from the original on 6 July 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  139. ^Muller, Charles (5 June 2018)."The Great Confucian-Buddhist Debate". In Buswell, Robert E. (ed.).Religions of Korea in Practice. Princeton University Press. p. 177.ISBN 978-0-691-18815-7.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  140. ^Groner, Paul (2000).Saicho: The Establishment of the Japanese Tendai School. University of Hawaii Press. p. 88.ISBN 978-0-8248-2371-9.Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  141. ^Williams, Paul (2008).Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations 2nd Ed., pp. 257–258. Routledge.
  142. ^Lotus Seeds: The Essence of Nichiren Shu Buddhism, San Jose Temple, p. 81.ISBN 0-9705920-0-0.
  143. ^"The Writings of Nichiren I, SGI 2006, pp. 3–5: On Attaining Buddhahood in This Lifetime". Sgilibrary.org. Archived fromthe original on 4 April 2013. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  144. ^Writings of Nichiren, Doctrine I, pp. 105-155.
  145. ^"Living Rissho Ankoku Ron Commentary by Rev. Ryuei". Nichirenscoffeehouse.net. Archived fromthe original on 16 December 2004. Retrieved6 September 2013.
  146. ^Hall, Elton H. (1988)."Nichiren – Great Teacher Series – Theosophy Trust".theosophytrust.mobi. Hermes Magazine.Archived from the original on 31 October 2018. Retrieved7 October 2018.
  147. ^Stone, Jacqueline I. (17 August 2012). "The Sin of "Slandering the True Dharma" in Nichiren's Thought".Sins and Sinners: Perspectives from Asian Religions. BRILL. pp. 149–150.ISBN 978-90-04-23200-6.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  148. ^Bloom, Alfred."Understanding the Social and Religious Meaning of Nichiren".Shin Dharma Net.Archived from the original on 11 September 2018. Retrieved24 October 2018.Because of his concern for the welfare of the country and exaltation of the truth of the Lotus Sutra as interpreted by Tendai, he appears to be intolerant, denouncing all other sects as false. He is famous for Four Denunciations in which he outlined the errors. Shingon is false because it destroys the nations. For Nichiren it was false magic. The nation would be protected by the Lotus. Historically the Japanese government employed Shingon rites whenever there was a disaster affecting the country. According to him, Zen is a teaching of devils because it held that one could become enlightened apart from scriptures. In Zen truth is beyond words and therefore it rejects the ultimacy of the words of Buddha. Pure Land nembutsu is a false way of salvation. Salvation comes only through the Lotus Sutra, particularly for Nichiren, reciting its title: Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō. The Ritsu or Precept sect is wrong because it is a thief. Here Nichiren apparently objected to the funds given this sect for social welfare activity. In any case, none of these prominent sects advocated the centrality of the Lotus Sutra. Eventually he came to include Tendai itelf because it was combined with Shingon teachings and rites. For him any compromise on the Lotus made them all false. Nichiren was a good scholar of history and knew the basic tenets of these groups, but he faulted them in their relation to the Lotus. His erudition is embodied in voluminous writings, especially five major texts which set forth the essence of his faith Also he wrote numerous letters, sharing his ideas and sentiments with followers.
  149. ^Urbain, Olivier, ed. (6 December 2013).A Forum for Peace: Daisaku Ikeda's Proposals to the UN. London. pp. 484–485.ISBN 978-1-78076-839-7.OCLC 861319983.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  150. ^Nichiren."The Opening of the Eyes | WND I | Nichiren Buddhism Library".www.nichirenlibrary.org.Archived from the original on 13 October 2024. Retrieved11 April 2025.
  151. ^abStone 2003, p. 252.
  152. ^abcStone, Jacqueline I. (January–March 2014)."A Votary of the Lotus Sutra Will Meet Ordeals: The Role of Suffering in Nichiren's Thought"(PDF).Dharma World.Archived(PDF) from the original on 3 August 2021. Retrieved5 December 2018.
  153. ^abcStone, Jacqueline I. (April–June 2014)."A Votary of the Lotus Sutra Will Meet Ordeals: The Role of Suffering in Nichiren's Thought"(PDF).Dharma World.Archived(PDF) from the original on 3 August 2021. Retrieved5 December 2018.
  154. ^Stone 2003, p. 242.
  155. ^Habito, Ruben L. F. (2005)."Review of Nichiren, der Ausubende des Lotos-Sutra by Yukio Matsudo".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies.32/1:166–174.Archived from the original on 1 July 2018. Retrieved5 December 2018.
  156. ^abcdefStone, Jacqueline.The Moment of Death in Nichiren's Thought. In Watanabe Hoyo Sensei koki kinen ronbunshu: Hokke bukkyo bunkashi ronso. Kyoto: Heirakuji Shoten, 2003.
  157. ^Toshie Kurihara.The Concept of Equality in the Lotus Sutra: The SGI’s Viewpoint.
  158. ^abMontgomery (1991), pp. 113-114.
  159. ^Anesaki, p. 50-51, 64, 68.
  160. ^Fowler, Jeaneane D.; Fowler, Merv (2009).Chanting in the Hillsides: The Buddhism of Nichiren Daishonin in Wales and the Borders. Apollo Books. p. 66.ISBN 978-1-84519-258-7.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  161. ^Tanabe, George Joji; Tanabe, Willa Jane (1989).The Lotus Sutra in Japanese Culture. University of Hawaii Press. p. 45.ISBN 978-0-8248-1198-3.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  162. ^Tamura, Yoshiro (15 July 2014).Introduction to the Lotus Sutra. Simon and Schuster. pp. 124–125.ISBN 978-1-61429-099-5.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  163. ^Hein, Patrick (2 October 2014).The Goddess and the Dragon: A Study on Identity Strength and Psychosocial Resilience in Japan. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 67, 71.ISBN 978-1-4438-6872-3.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved3 October 2020.
  164. ^Goethals, George R.; Sorenson, Georgia Jones; Burns, James MacGregor, eds. (29 February 2004).Encyclopedia of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p. 1089.ISBN 978-1-4522-6530-8.OCLC 162107505.
  165. ^Kitagawa, Joseph M. (2010).Religion in Japanese History. Recorded Books, Inc. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 121.ISBN 978-0-231-51509-2.OCLC 945079172.
  166. ^"文化庁 宗教年鑑 令和5年版"(PDF).Agency for Cultural Affairs. 28 December 2023. p. 51. Retrieved17 March 2024.
  167. ^Burton Watson and the Gosho Translation Committee: The Writings of Nichiren, Volume I, Soka Gakkai, 2006.ISBN 4-412-01024-4.
  168. ^Burton Watson and the Gosho Translation Committee: The Writings of Nichiren, Volume II, Soka Gakkai, 2006.ISBN 4-412-01350-2.
  169. ^Kyotsu Hori (transl.): Writings of Nichiren, Doctrine Vol. 1–6, University of Hawai'i Press, 2003–2010.
  170. ^Jacqueline I. Stone, Some Disputed Writings in the Nichiren Corpus: Textual, Hermeneutical and Historical Problems, Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1990PDF.Archived 30 October 2013 at theWayback Machine (21 MB) retrieved 26 July 2013.
  171. ^Fumehiko, Sueki (1999). "Nichirens Problematic Works".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies.26 (3–4):261–280.
  172. ^"Listing of Authenticated Gosho (Goibun) of Nichiren".Archived from the original on 26 March 2013. Retrieved26 December 2013.
  173. ^Koushiki, Choudhury (6 March 2017).Finding Peace: An Oriental Quest. London: Bloomsbury. p. 141.ISBN 978-81-933150-4-0.OCLC 974496695.
  174. ^Soka Gakkai Dictionary of Buddhism, Soka Gakkai, "Five Major Writings".
  175. ^Dharma Flower, Ryuei Michael McCormick (2000), p. 156: "The five most important works of Nichiren. The five major writings are: Rissho ankoku ron (Treatise on Spreading Peace Throughout the Country by Establishing the True Dharma), Kaimoku sho (Open Your Eyes), Kanjin no honzon sho (Spiritual Contemplation and the Focus of Devotion), Senji sho (Selecting the Right Time), and Ho'on sho (Recompense of Indebtedness)."
  176. ^abSoka Gakkai Dictionary of Buddhism, Soka Gakkai, "Ten Major Writings".
  177. ^Soka Gakkai Dictionary of Buddhism, Soka Gakkai, "Rissho Ankoku Ron".
  178. ^"Authentic Writings of Nichiren Shonin [1222-1282]".pounceatron.dreamhosters.com.
  179. ^Rodd, Laurel Rasplica (1978)."Nichiren and Setsuwa".Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 5/2-3 June–September:159–185.Archived from the original on 4 July 2018. Retrieved4 December 2018.
  180. ^Kurihara, Toshie (2003)."A History of Women in Japanese Buddhism: Nichiren's Perspectives on the Enlightenment of Women"(PDF).The Journal of Oriental Studies.13: 94. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 14 March 2012.
  181. ^Oguri, Junko. 1987. Nyonin ojo: Nihon-shi ni miru onna no sukui(Women's Capacity to Be Reborn in the Pure Land: Women's Salvation in Japanese History). Jimbun Shoin, p. 122. See also: Oguri, Junko. 1984. "Views on Women's Salvation in Japanese Buddhism" in Young East 10/1, pp. 3–11.
  182. ^"(WND, p. 385)".Archived from the original on 1 October 2011. Retrieved28 October 2010.
  183. ^Ueki, Masatoshi (2001).Gender Equality in Buddhism. Peter Lang. p. 114.ISBN 978-0-8204-5133-6.Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved21 October 2018.
  184. ^Nyonin Gosho, Letters Addressed to Female Followers, Translated by Nichiren Shu Overseas Ministers in North America, Edited and Compiled by Kyotsu Hori, published 1995 by Nichiren Shu Overseas Propagation Promotion Association.
  185. ^Rasplica Rodd, Laurel (6 June 2016)."Nichiren's Teachings to Women".Selected Papers in Asian Studies: Western Conference of the Association for Asian Studies.1 (5):8–18.Archived from the original on 18 September 2018. Retrieved17 September 2018.
  186. ^The Power of Denial: Buddhism, Purity, and Gender, Bernard Faure,ISBN 978-1-4008-2561-5, Princeton University Press, 2009, p. 93.
  187. ^Kaishuku Mochizuki (jp), 1967, 新校舎落成式挙行, pp.125-130, 学園だより,Minobusan University.
  188. ^Keibunsha (jp), 1997,日本特撮・幻想映画全集 p. 255.
  189. ^Yomiuri Shimbunsha (jp), 1978, Yomiuri Weekly (jp), Vol. September 3, 1978, p. 15,The Yomiuri Shimbun Holdings.

Bibliography

[edit]

English translations of Nichiren's writings

[edit]

One recent translation collection of Nichiren's work appears is the work of Nichirenshū Overseas Propagation Promotion Association (NOPPA) and is published by Nichiren Buddhist International Center. Now in its second edition, it was published in 2021 and contains seven volumes:[1]

  • Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine I (Vol. 1)
  • Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine II (Vol. 2)
  • Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine III (Vol. 3)
  • Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Faith and Practice (Vol. 4)
  • Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Biography and Disciples (Vol. 5)
  • Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Followers I (Vol. 6)
  • Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Followers II (Vol. 7)

Other translations of Nichiren's work into English include:

  • The Major Writings of Nichiren. Soka Gakkai, Tokyo, 1999.
  • Heisei Shimpen Dai-Nichiren Gosho (平成新編 大日蓮御書: "Heisei new compilation of Nichiren's writings"), Taisekiji, 1994.
  • The Writings of Nichiren, Volume I, Burton Watson and the Gosho Translation Committee. Soka Gakkai, 2006,ISBN 4-412-01024-4.
  • The Writings of Nichiren, Volume II, Burton Watson and the Gosho Translation Committee. Soka Gakkai, 2006,ISBN 4-412-01350-2.
  • The Record of the Orally Transmitted Teachings, Burton Watson, trans. Soka Gakkai, 2005,ISBN 4-412-01286-7.
  • Writings of Nichiren, Chicago, Middleway Press, 2013, The Opening of the Eyes.[2]
  • Letters of Nichiren,Burton Watson et al., trans.; Philip B. Yampolsky, ed. Columbia University Press, 1996ISBN 0-231-10384-0.
  • Selected Writings of Nichiren, Burton Watson et al., trans.; Philip B. Yampolsky, ed.Columbia University, Press, 1990,ISBN 0-231-07260-0.

External links

[edit]
Buddhas
如来部 (Nyorai-bu)
Bodhisattvas
菩薩部 (Bosatsu-bu)
Wisdom Kings
明王部 (Myōō-bu)
Heavenly deities
天部 (Ten-bu)
Circumstantial appearances
垂迹身部 (Suijakushin-bu)
Religious masters
高僧・祖師部 (Kōsō・Soshi-bu)
   Topics inBuddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
International
National
Academics
People
Other
  1. ^"Writings of Nichiren Shonin Second Edition".NBIC Online Store. Retrieved12 April 2025.
  2. ^Daisaku Ikeda (2013).The Opening of the Eyes: Commentaries on the Writings of Nichiren. Chicago: Middleway Press.OCLC 853362350.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nichiren&oldid=1318126188"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp