Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Nguyễn dynasty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last dynasty of Vietnam (1802–1945)
For the surname, seeNguyen (surname).
"Kingdom of Vietnam" redirects here. For other kingdoms, seeList of Vietnamese dynasties.

Đại Việt
大越國
(1802–1804)
Việt Nam
大越南
(1804–1839; 1945)
Đại Nam
大南國
(1839–1945)
1802–1945[a]
Anthem: Đăng đàn cung
("The Emperor Mounts His Throne")
Heirloom Seal of the Southern Realm
Đại Nam thụ thiên vĩnh mệnh truyền quốc tỷ
大南受天永命傳國璽

(1846–1945)
Vietnam at its greatest extent (1835–1841) under the latter reign of EmperorMinh Mạng[2][3]
  Vietnam in 1841
Administrative divisions of Việt Nam in 1838 during the reign of Emperor Minh Mạng.
Administrative divisions of Việt Nam in 1838 during the reign of EmperorMinh Mạng.
StatusInternal imperial system withinChinesetributary (1802–1883)[4][5]
Frenchprotectorate (1883–1945)[6][7]
Puppet state of theEmpire of Japan (1945)[8][9]
CapitalPhú Xuân (now part ofHuế)
16°28′N107°36′E / 16.467°N 107.600°E /16.467; 107.600
Official languagesVietnamese
Văn ngôn
French (from 1884)
Religion
State ideology:
Ruism
Minority:
Mahayana Buddhism,Caodaism,Christianity,Folk religion,Hòa Hảo,Hinduism,Islam, andTaoism
DemonymVietnamese
GovernmentAbsolute monarchy
Emperor 
• 1802–1820 (first)
Gia Long
• 1883 (last independent)
Hiệp Hòa
• 1926–1945 (last)
Bảo Đại
Regent 
• 1818–1820
Minh Mạng
• 1883–1885
Tôn Thất Thuyết &Nguyễn Văn Tường
Prime Minister 
• 1945
Trần Trọng Kim
LegislatureNone (rule by decree)
History 
• Coronation ofGia Long Emperor
1 June 1802
20 July 1802
1 September 1858
5 June 1862
25 August 1883
6 June 1884
11 March 1945
25 August 1945
Area
1830557,000 km2 (215,000 sq mi)
Population
• 1830
10,500,000
• 1858
12,031,000
• 1890
14,752,000
• 1942
25,552,000
CurrencyZinc andcopper-alloycash coins (denominated in phần,văn,mạch, andquán)
Silver and gold cash coins andingots (denominated inphân, nghi,tiền, andlạng / lượng)
French Indochinese piastre (from 1885)
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Nguyễn lords
Tây Sơn dynasty
1862:
Cochinchina
1883:
Annam
1883:
Tonkin
1945:
Democratic Republic of Vietnam
1955:
Republic of Vietnam
Today part ofVietnam
China
Laos
Cambodia
Nguyễn
CountryState ofĐại Nam (Vietnam)
Founded19th century
FounderNguyễn Phúc Ánh
Final rulerNguyễn Phúc Vĩnh Thụy
Titles
EstatePhú Xuân
Deposition1945

TheNguyễn dynasty (Vietnamese:Nhà Nguyễn or Triều Nguyễn,chữ Nôm: 茹阮,chữ Hán: 朝阮) was the lastVietnamese dynasty, preceded by theNguyễn lords and ruling unified Vietnam independently from 1802 until the start of the French protectorate in 1883. Its emperors were members of theHouse of Nguyễn Phúc. During its existence, the Nguyễn empire expanded into modern-day Southern Vietnam,Cambodia, andLaos through a continuation of the centuries-longNam tiến andSiamese–Vietnamese wars. With theFrench conquest of Vietnam, the Nguyễn dynasty was forced to give up sovereignty over parts ofSouthern Vietnam to France in 1862 and 1874, and after 1883 the Nguyễn dynasty only nominally ruled the Frenchprotectorates ofAnnam (Central Vietnam) as well asTonkin (Northern Vietnam). Backed byImperial Japan, in 1945 the last Nguyễn emperorBảo Đại abolished the protectorate treaty with France and proclaimed theEmpire of Vietnam for a short time until 25 August 1945.

TheHouse of Nguyễn Phúc established control over large amounts of territory in Southern Vietnam as theNguyễn lords (1558–1777, 1780–1802) by the 16th century before defeating theTây Sơn dynasty and establishing their own imperial rule in the 19th century. The dynastic rule began withGia Long ascending the throne in 1802, after ending the previous Tây Sơn dynasty. The Nguyễn dynasty was gradually absorbed byFrance over the course of several decades in the latter half of the 19th century, beginning with theCochinchina Campaign in 1858 which led to the occupation of thesouthern area of Vietnam. A series ofunequal treaties followed; the occupied territory became theFrench colony of Cochinchina in the1862 Treaty of Saigon, and the1863 Treaty of Huế gave France access to Vietnamese ports and increased control of its foreign affairs. Finally, the1883 and1884 Treaties of Huế divided the remaining Vietnamese territory into the protectorates of Annam and Tonkin under nominal Nguyễn Phúc rule. In 1887, Cochinchina, Annam, Tonkin, and theFrench Protectorate of Cambodia were grouped together to formFrench Indochina.

The Nguyễn dynasty remained the formal emperors of Annam and Tonkin within Indochina untilWorld War II.Japan had occupied Indochina withFrench collaboration in 1940, but as the war seemed increasingly lost,Japan overthrew the French administration on 9 March 1945 and the Nguyễn dynasty proclaimed independence for its constituent protectorates two days later. It also regained Cochinchina on 14 August 1945. TheEmpire of Vietnam under Nguyễn EmperorBảo Đại was a nominally independent state but actually a Japanesepuppet state during the last months of the war. It ended with theabdication of Bảo Đại following thesurrender of Japan thenAugust Revolution led by the communistViệt Minh in August 1945. This ended the 143-year rule of the Nguyễn dynasty.[10] Bảo Đại was later restored to power to become emperor of theState of Vietnam in 1949 until the country became arepublic in 1955.[1]

Names

[edit]
Further information:Names of Vietnam

Việt Nam

[edit]
‹ ThetemplateInfobox Chinese/Vietnamese is beingconsidered for deletion. ›
Country of Vietnam
AViệt Nam Nguyên Bảo (越南元寶), goldsycee of 10taels produced during theMinh Mạng period.
Vietnamese alphabetNước Việt Nam
Hán-Nôm渃越南

The nameViệt Nam (Vietnamese pronunciation:[viə̀tnaːm],chữ Hán:越南) is a variation ofNam Việt (南越; literally "SouthernViệt"), a name that can be traced back to theTriệu Dynasty of the second century BC.[11] The term "Việt" (Yue) (Chinese:; pinyin:Yuè; Cantonese Yale:Yuht; Wade–Giles:Yüeh4; Vietnamese:Việt) inEarly Middle Chinese was first written using thelogograph "戉" for an axe (a homophone), inoracle bone and bronze inscriptions of the lateShang Dynasty (c. 1200 BC), and later as "越".[12] At that time it referred to a people or chieftain to the northwest of the Shang.[13] In the early eighth century BC, a tribe on the middleYangtze were called theYangyue, a term later used for peoples further south.[13] Between the seventh and fourth centuries BC Yue/Việt referred to theState of Yue in the lower Yangtze basin and its people.[12][13] From the third century BC the term was used for the non-Chinese populations of south and southwest China and northern Vietnam, with particular ethnic groups calledMinyue,Ouyue, Luoyue (Vietnamese:Lạc Việt), etc., collectively called theBaiyue (Bách Việt,Chinese:百越; pinyin:Bǎiyuè; Cantonese Yale:Baak Yuet; Vietnamese:Bách Việt; lit. 'Hundred Yue/Viet'; ).[12][13][14] The term Baiyue/Bách Việt first appeared in the bookLüshi Chunqiu compiled around 239 BC.[15] By the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, educated Vietnamese called themselves and their people asngười Việt andngười Nam, which combined to becomengười Việt Nam (Vietnamese people). However, this designation was for the Vietnamese themselves and not for the whole country.[16]

The formViệt Nam (越南) is first recorded in the 16th-century oracular poemSấm Trạng Trình. The name has also been found on 12steles carved in the 16th and 17th centuries, including one at Bao Lam Pagoda inHải Phòng that dates to 1558.[17] In 1802,Nguyễn Phúc Ánh (who later became Emperor Gia Long) established the Nguyễn dynasty. In the second year of his rule, he asked theJiaqing Emperor of theQing dynasty to confer on him the title 'King of Nam Việt / Nanyue' (南越 in Chinese character) after seizing power in Annam. The Emperor refused because the name was related toZhao Tuo's Nanyue, which included the regions ofGuangxi andGuangdong in southern China. The Qing Emperor, therefore, decided to call the area "Việt Nam" instead.[18] Between 1804 and 1813, the name Vietnam was used officially by Emperor Gia Long.[b]

Đại Nam

[edit]
‹ ThetemplateInfobox Chinese/Vietnamese is beingconsidered for deletion. ›
State of Đại Nam
Vietnamese alphabetĐại Nam Quốc
Chữ Hán大南國

In 1839, under the rule of EmperorMinh Mạng's, the official name of the empire wasĐại Việt Nam (大越南, which means "Great Vietnam"), and it was shortened toĐại Nam (大南, which means "Great South").[20][21]

Nam Triều

[edit]

During the 1930sits government used the nameNam Triều (南朝, Southern dynasty) on its official documents.[22]

Other names

[edit]

Westerners in the past often called the kingdomAnnam[23][24] or theAnnamite Empire.[25] However, in Vietnamese historiography, modern historians often refer to this period in Vietnamese history asNguyễn Vietnam,[26] or simply Vietnam to distinguish with the pre-19th century Kingdom ofĐại Việt.[27]

History

[edit]

Background and establishment

[edit]

Origin of Nguyễn clan

[edit]
Main article:Nguyễn lords

The Nguyễn clan, which originated in theThanh Hóa Province had long exerted substantial political influence and military power throughout early modernVietnamese history through one form or another. The clan's affiliations with the ruling elites dated back to the tenth century whenNguyễn Bặc was appointed the first grand chancellor of the short-livedĐinh dynasty under emperorĐinh Bộ Lĩnh in 965.[28] Another instance of their influences materializes throughNguyễn Thị Anh, the empress consort of emperorLê Thái Tông; she served as the official regent of Đại Việt for her son, the child emperorLê Nhân Tông between 1442 and 1453.[29]

Lê dynasty's loyal vassal

[edit]

In 1527,Mạc Đăng Dung, after defeating and executing theLê dynasty's vassal, Nguyễn Hoằng Dụ in a rebellion, emerged as the intermediate victor and established theMạc dynasty. He did this by deposing the Lê emperor,Lê Cung Hoàng, taking the throne for himself, effectively ending the once prosperous but declininglater Lê dynasty. Nguyễn Hoằng Dụ's son,Nguyễn Kim, the leader of the Nguyễn clan with his allies, theTrịnh clan remained fiercely loyal to theLê dynasty. They attempted to restore the Lê dynasty to power, igniting an anti-Mạc rebellion, in favor of the loyalist cause.[30][31] Both the Trịnh and Nguyễn clan again took up arms inThanh Hóa province and revolted against the Mạc. However the initial rebellion failed and the loyalist forces had to fled to the kingdom ofLan Xang, where kingPhotisarath allows them to establish an exiled loyalist government inXam Neua (modern day Laos). The Lê loyalists under Lê Ninh, a descendant of the imperial family, escaped to Muang Phuan (todayLaos). During this exile, the Marquis of An Thanh,Nguyễn Kim summoned those who were still loyal to the Lê emperor and formed a new army to begin another revolt against Mạc Đăng Dung. In 1539, the coalition returned to Đại Việt beginning their military campaign against theMạc inThanh Hóa, capturing theTây Đô in 1543.

Nguyễn's dominion in the south

[edit]
Main article:Thuận Hóa

In 1539, the Lê dynasty was restored in opposition to the Mạc inThăng Long, this occurred after the loyalist's capture of Thanh Hoá province, reinstalling the Lê emperorLê Trang Tông on the throne. However, the Mạc at this point still controls most of the country, including the capital,Thăng Long.Nguyễn Kim, who had served as leader of the loyalists throughout the 12 years of theLê–Mạc War (from 1533 to 1545) and throughout theNorthern and Southern dynasties period, was assassinated in 1545 by a captured Mạc general,Dương Chấp Nhất. Shortly after Nguyễn Kim's death, his son-in-law,Trịnh Kiểm, leader of the Trịnh clan, killed Nguyễn Uông, the eldest son of Kim to take over the control of the loyalist forces. The sixth son of Kim,Nguyễn Hoàng, fears that his fate will be like his elder brother; therefore, he tried to escape the capital to avoid the purges. Later, he asks his sister, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Bảo (the wife of Trịnh Kiểm) to ask Kiểm to appoint him to be the governor of far-south frontier of Đại Việt,Thuận Hóa (modern Quảng Bình to Quảng Nam provinces). Trịnh Kiểm, thinking of this proposal as an opportunity to remove the power and influence of Nguyễn Hoàng away from the capital city, agreed to the proposal.

In 1558,Lê Anh Tông, emperor of the newly-restoredLê dynasty appointedNguyễn Hoàng to the lordship of theThuận Hóa, the territory which have been previously conquered during the 15th century from theChampa kingdom. This event of Nguyễn Hoàng leaving Thăng Long laid the foundation for the eventual fragmentation and division of Đại Việt later down the road as theTrịnh clan would solidify their power in theNorth, establishing a unique political system where the emperors would reign (as figureheads) yet theTrịnh lords would rule (wielding actual political power). Meanwhile the descendants of the Nguyễn clan, through the bloodline of Nguyễn Hoàng would rule in theSouth; the Nguyễn clan, just like their Trịnh relatives in the north, recognize the authority of the Lê emperors over Đại Việt yet at the same time solely exercise political power over their own territory.[32] The officialschism of the two families however, would not begin until 1627, the first war between the two.

Nguyễn Phúc Lan chose the city ofPhú Xuân in 1636 as his residence and established the dominion of the Nguyễn lord in the southern part of the country. Although the Nguyễn and Trịnh lords ruled as de facto rulers in their respective lands, they paid official tribute to the Lê emperors in a ceremonial gesture, and recognize Lê dynasty as the legitimacy ofĐại Việt.

Nguyễn-Trịnh confrontation

[edit]
Main article:Trịnh–Nguyễn War

Nguyễn Hoàng and his successors started to engage inrivalry with the Trịnh lords, after refusing to pay tax and tribute to the central government inHanoi asNguyễn lords tried to create the autonomous regime. They expanded their territory by making parts ofCambodia as a protectorate, invadedLaos, captured the last vestiges ofChampa in 1693 and ruled in an unbroken line until 1776.[33][34][35]

Tây Sơn–Nguyễn war (1771–1802)

[edit]
Further information:Tây Sơn wars,Tây Sơn dynasty § Conquest of Nguyễn lords,Trịnh–Nguyễn War § Conquest of Huế – 1775, andLê dynasty § Tây Sơn rebellion

The end of the Nguyễn lords' reign

[edit]
Red, pink and white book cover
The cover of Tân Dân Tử's (1875–1955) 1930 book,Gia Long tẩu quốc, depicted the exile of Nguyễn Ánh.

The 17th-century war between the Trịnh and the Nguyễn ended in an uneasy peace, with the two sides creating de facto separate states although both professed loyalty to the sameLê dynasty. After 100 years of domestic peace, the Nguyễn lords were confronted with theTây Sơn rebellion in 1774. Its military had had considerable losses in manpower after a series of campaigns in Cambodia and proved unable to contain the revolt. By the end of the year, the Trịnh lords had formed an alliance with the Tây Sơn rebels and captured Huế in 1775.[36]

Nguyễn lord,Nguyễn Phúc Thuần fled south to theQuảng Nam province, where he left a garrison under co-rulerNguyễn Phúc Dương. He fled further south to theGia Định Province (around modern-day Ho Chi Minh City) by sea before the arrival of Tây Sơn leaderNguyễn Nhạc, whose forces defeated the Nguyễn garrison and seized Quảng Nam.[37]

In early 1777 a large Tây Sơn force underNguyễn Huệ andNguyễn Lữ attacked and captured Gia Định from the sea and defeated the Nguyễn Lord forces. The Tây Sơn received widespread popular support as they presented themselves as champions of the Vietnamese people, who rejected any foreign influence and fought for the full reinstitution of the Lê dynasty. Hence, the elimination of the Nguyễn and Trinh lordships was considered a priority and all but one member of the Nguyễn family captured at Saigon were executed.

Nguyễn Ánh escapes

[edit]

In 1775, the 13-year-oldNguyễn Ánh escaped and with the help of the Vietnamese Catholic priest Paul Hồ Văn Nghị soon arrived at theParis Foreign Missions Society inHà Tiên. With Tây Son search parties closing in, he kept on moving and eventually met the French missionaryPigneau de Behaine. By retreating to theThổ Chu Islands in the Gulf of Thailand, both escaped Tây Sơn capture.[38][39][40]

Pigneau de Behaine decided to support Ánh, who had declared himself heir to the Nguyễn lordship. A month later the Tây Sơn army under Nguyễn Huệ had returned toQuy Nhơn. Ánh seized the opportunity and quickly raised an army at his new base inLong Xuyên, marched to Gia Định and occupied the city in December 1777. The Tây Sơn returned to Gia Định in February 1778 and recaptured the province. When Ánh approached with his army, the Tây Sơn retreated.[41]

By the summer of 1781, Ánh's forces had grown to 30,000 soldiers, 80 battleships, three large ships and two Portuguese ships procured with the help of de Behaine. Ánh organized an unsuccessful ambush of the Tây Sơn base camps in thePhú Yên province. In March 1782 the Tây Sơn emperorThái Đức and his brother Nguyễn Huệ sent a naval force to attack Ánh. Ánh's army was defeated and he fled via Ba Giồng to Svay Rieng in Cambodia.

Nguyễn–Cambodian agreement

[edit]

Ánh met with the Cambodian KingAng Eng, who granted him exile and offered support in his struggle with the Tây Sơn. In April 1782 a Tây Sơn army invaded Cambodia, detained and forced Ang Eng to pay tribute, and demanded, that all Vietnamese nationals living in Cambodia were to return to Vietnam.[42]

Chinese Vietnamese support for Nguyễn Ánh

[edit]
See also:Hoa people § Early immigration: 15th-18th centuries

Support by the Chinese Vietnamese began when theQing dynasty overthrew theMing dynasty. TheHan Chinese refused to live under theManchu Qing and fled to Southeast Asia (including Vietnam). Most were welcomed by the Nguyễn lords to resettle insouthern Vietnam and set up business and trade.

In 1782, Nguyễn Ánh escaped to Cambodia and the Tây Sơn seized southern Vietnam (now Cochinchina). They had discriminated against the ethnic Chinese, displeasing the Chinese-Vietnamese. That April, Nguyễn loyalists Tôn Thất Dụ, Trần Xuân Trạch, Trần Văn Tự and Trần Công Chương sent military support to Ánh. The Nguyễn army killedgrand admiral Phạm Ngạn, who had a close relationship with Emperor Thái Đức, at Tham Lương bridge.[42] Thái Đức, angry, thought that the ethnic Chinese had collaborated in the killing. He sacked the town of Cù lao (present-dayBiên Hòa), which had a large Chinese population,[43][44] and ordered the oppression of the Chinese community to avenge their assistance to Ánh.Ethnic cleansing had previously occurred inHoi An, leading to support by wealthy Chinese for Ánh. He returned to Giồng Lữ, defeated Admiral Nguyễn Học of the Tây Sơn and captured eighty battleships. Ánh then began a campaign to reclaim southern Vietnam, but Nguyễn Huệ deployed a naval force to the river and destroyed his navy. Ánh again escaped with his followers toHậu Giang. Cambodia later cooperated with the Tây Sơn to destroy Ánh's force and made him retreat toRạch Giá, then toHà Tiên andPhú Quốc.

Nguyễn–Siam alliance

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Rạch Gầm-Xoài Mút

Following consecutive losses to the Tây Sơn, Ánh sent his generalChâu Văn Tiếp to Siam to request military assistance. Siam, underChakri rule, wanted to conquer Cambodia and southern Vietnam. KingRama I agreed to ally with the Nguyễn lord and intervene militarily in Vietnam. Châu Văn Tiếp sent a secret letter to Ánh about the alliance. After meeting with Siamese generals atCà Mau, Ánh, thirty officials and some troops visitedBangkok to meet Rama I in May 1784. The governor ofGia Định Province,Nguyễn Văn Thành, advised Ánh against foreign assistance.[45][46]

Nguyễn Ánh (sitting, 2nd row) in audience with KingRama I inPhra Thinang Amarin Winitchai throne hall, Bangkok, 1782.

Rama I, fearing the growing influence of the Tây Sơn dynasty in Cambodia and Laos, decided to dispatch his army against it. In Bangkok, Ánh began to recruit Vietnamese refugees in Siam to join his army (which totaled over 9,000).[47] He returned to Vietnam and prepared his forces for the Tây Sơn campaign in June 1784, after which he captured Gia Định. Rama I nominated his nephew, Chiêu Tăng, as admiral the following month. The admiral led Siamese forces including 20,000 marine troops and 300 warships from the Gulf of Siam toKiên Giang Province. In addition, more than 30,000 Siamese infantry troops crossed the Cambodian border toAn Giang Province.[48] On 25 November 1784, AdmiralChâu Văn Tiếp died in battle against the Tây Sơn inMang Thít District,Vĩnh Long Province. The alliance was largely victorious from July through November, and the Tây Sơn army retreated north. However, Emperor Nguyễn Huệ halted the retreat and counter-attacked the Siamese forces in December. In the decisive battle of Rạch Gầm–Xoài Mút, more than 20,000 Siamese soldiers died and the remainder retreated to Siam.[49]

Ánh, disillusioned with Siam, escaped toThổ Chu Island in April 1785 and then toKo Kut Island in Thailand. The Siamese army escorted him back to Bangkok, and he was briefly exiled in Thailand.

French assistance

[edit]
Further information:French assistance to Nguyễn Ánh

The war between the Nguyễn lord and the Tây Sơn dynasty forced Ánh to find more allies. His relationship with de Behaine improved, and support for an alliance with France increased. Before the request for Siamese military assistance, de Behaine was inChanthaburi and Ánh asked him to come toPhú Quốc Island.[50] Ánh asked him to contact KingLouis XVI of France for assistance; de Behaine agreed to coordinate an alliance between France and Vietnam, and Ánh gave him a letter to present at the French court. Ánh's oldest son,Nguyễn Phúc Cảnh, was chosen to accompany de Behaine. Due to inclement weather, the voyage was postponed until December 1784. The group departed from Phú Quốc Island forMalacca and thence toPondicherry, and Ánh moved his family to Bangkok.[51] The group arrived inLorient in February 1787, and Louis XVI agreed to meet them in May.

  • Signatures on the 1787 Treaty of Versailles
    Signatures on the 1787 Treaty of Versailles
  • Pigneau de Behaine, the French priest who recruited armies for Nguyễn Ánh during Ánh's war against the Tây Sơn
    Pigneau de Behaine, the French priest who recruited armies for Nguyễn Ánh during Ánh's war against the Tây Sơn

On 28 November 1787, Behaine signed theTreaty of Versailles with FrenchMinister of Foreign AffairsArmand Marc at thePalace of Versailles on behalf of Nguyễn Ánh.[52] The treaty stipulated that France provide four frigates, 1,200 infantry troops, 200 artillery, 250cafres (African soldiers), and other equipment. Nguyễn Ánh ceded theĐà Nẵng estuary andCôn Sơn Island to France.[53] The French were allowed to trade freely and control foreign trade in Vietnam. Vietnam had to build one ship per year which was similar to the French ship which brought aid and gave it to France. Vietnam was obligated to supply food and other aid to France when the French were at war with other East Asian nations.

On 27 December 1787, Pigneau de Behaine andNguyễn Phúc Cảnh left France for Pondicherry to wait for the military support promised by the treaty. However, due to theFrench Revolution and the abolition of the French monarchy, the treaty was never executed.Thomas Conway, who was responsible for French assistance, refused to provide it. Although the treaty was not implemented, de Behaine recruited French businessman who intended to trade in Vietnam and raised funds to assist Nguyễn Ánh. He spent fifteen thousand francs of his own money to purchase guns and warships. Cảnh and de Behaine returned to Gia Định in 1788 (after Nguyễn Ánh had recaptured it), followed by a ship with the war materiel. Frenchmen who were recruited includedJean-Baptiste Chaigneau,Philippe Vannier,Olivier de Puymanel, andJean-Marie Dayot. A total of twenty people joined Ánh's army. The French purchased and supplied equipment and weaponry, reinforcing the defense of Gia Định, Vĩnh Long, Châu Đốc, Hà Tiên, Biên Hòa, Bà Rịa and training Ánh's artillery and infantry according to the European model.[54]

Qing China–Lê alliance against Tây Sơn

[edit]
Further information:Tây Sơn dynasty § Qing invasion, andBattle of Ngọc Hồi-Đống Đa
Color-coded map of Vietnam
Vietnam at the end of the 18th century. The Tây Sơn army, includingNguyễn Huệ, ruled the north (purple);Nguyễn Nhạc the middle (yellow), andNguyễn Ánh the south (green).

In 1786, Nguyễn Huệ led the army against the Trịnh lords;Trịnh Khải escaped to the north but got captured by the local people. He then committed suicide. After the Tây Sơn army returned to Quy Nhơn, subjects of the Trịnh lord restoredTrịnh Bồng (son ofTrịnh Giang) as the next lord.Lê Chiêu Thống, emperor of the Lê dynasty, wanted to regain power from the Trịnh. He summoned Nguyễn Hữu Chỉnh, governor of Nghệ An, to attack the Trịnh lord at theImperial Citadel of Thăng Long. Trịnh Bồng surrendered to the Lê and became a monk. Nguyễn Hữu Chỉnh wanted to unify the country under Lê rule, and began to prepare the army to march south and attack the Tây Sơn. Huệ led the army, killed Nguyễn Hữu Chỉnh, and captured the later Lê capital. The Lê imperial family were exiled to China, and the later Lê dynasty collapsed.

At that time, Nguyễn Huệ's influence became stronger in northern Vietnam; this made Emperor Nguyễn Nhạc of the Tây Sơn dynasty suspect Huệ's loyalty. The relationship between the brothers became tense, eventually leading to battle. Huệ had his army surround Nhạc's capital, at Quy Nhơn citadel, in 1787. Nhạc begged Huệ not to kill him, and they reconciled. In 1788, Lê emperor Lê Chiêu Thống fled to China and asked for military assistance. TheQianlong Emperor of the Qing orderedSun Shiyi to lead the military campaign into Vietnam. The campaign failed, and later on, the Qing recognized the Tây Sơn as the legitimate dynasty in Vietnam. However, with the death of Huệ (1792), the Tây Sơn dynasty began to weaken.

Franco–Nguyễn alliance against Tây Sơn

[edit]
Main article:Vietnamese Civil War of 1789–1802
Nguyễn Ánh's counter-attack
[edit]

Ánh began to reorganize a strong armed force in Siam. He left Siam (after thanking King Rama I), and returned to Vietnam.[55][56] During the 1787 war between Nguyễn Huệ and Nguyễn Nhạc in northern Vietnam, Ánh recaptured the southern Vietnamese capital of Gia Định. Southern Vietnam had been ruled by the Nguyễns and they remained popular, especially with the ethnic Chinese.Nguyễn Lữ, the youngest brother of Tây Sơn (who ruled southern Vietnam), could not defend the citadel and retreated toQuy Nhơn. The citadel of Gia Định was seized by the Nguyễn lords.[57]
In 1788 de Behaine and Ánh's son, Prince Cảnh, arrived in Gia Định with modern war equipment and more than twenty Frenchmen who wanted to join the army. The force was trained and strengthened with French assistance.[58]

Defeat of the Tây Sơn
[edit]

After the fall of the citadel at Gia Định, Nguyễn Huệ prepared an expedition to reclaim it before his death on 16 September 1792. His young son,Nguyễn Quang Toản, succeeded him as emperor of the Tây Sơn and was a poor leader.[59] In 1793, Nguyễn Ánh began a campaign against Quang Toản. Due to conflict between officials of the Tây Sơn court, Quang Toản lost battle after battle. In 1797, Ánh and Nguyễn Phúc Cảnh attackedQui Nhơn (then inPhú Yên Province) in the Battle of Thị Nại. They were victorious, capturing a large amount of Tây Sơn equipment.[60] Quang Toản became unpopular due to his murders of generals and officials, leading to a decline in the army. In 1799, Ánh captured the citadel of Quy Nhơn. He seized the capital (Phú Xuân) on 3 May 1801, and Quang Toản retreated north. On 20 July 1802, Ánh capturedHanoi and end theTây Sơn dynasty, all of the members of the Tây Sơn was captured. Ánh then executed all the members of the Tây Sơn dynasty that year.

Imperial rule (1802–1883)

[edit]

Overview

[edit]

In Vietnamese historiography, the independent period is referred to as theNhà Nguyễn thời độc lập period. During this period the Nguyễn dynasty's territories comprised the present-day territories ofVietnam and parts of modernCambodia andLaos, borderingSiam to the west and ManchuQing dynasty to the north. The ruling Nguyễn emperors established and ran the first well-defined imperial administrative and bureaucratic system of Vietnam and annexed Cambodia andChampa into its territories in the 1830s. Together with Chakri Siam andKonbaung Burma, it was one among three major Southeast Asian powers at the time.[61] The emperor Gia Long was relatively friendly toward Western powers and Christianity. After his reign ofMinh Mạng brought a new approach, he ruled for 21 years from 1820 to 1841, as a conservative andConfucian ruler; introducing a policy of isolationism which kept the country from the rest of the world for nearly 40 years until theFrench invasion in 1858. Minh Mạng tightened control overCatholicism,Muslim, and ethnic minorities, resulting in more than two hundred rebellions across the country during his twenty-one-year reign. He also further expanded Vietnamese imperialism in modern-dayLaos andCambodia.

Minh Mạng's successors,Thiệu Trị (r. 1841–1847) andTự Đức (r. 1847–1883) would be assailed by serious problems that ultimately decimated the Vietnamese state. In the late 1840s, Vietnam was struck by the globalcholerapandemic that killed roughly 8% of the country's population, while the countries isolationist policies damaged the economy. France and Spain declared war on Vietnam in September 1858. Faced with these industrialised powers, the hermit Nguyễn dynasty and its military crumbled, the alliance capturingSaigon in early 1859. A series ofunequal treaties followed with first the1862 Treaty of Saigon, and then the1863 Treaty of Huế which gave France access to Vietnamese ports and increased control of its foreign affairs. TheTreaty of Saigon (1874) concluded the French annexation of Cochinchina that had begun in 1862.

The last independent Nguyễn emperor of note was Tự Đức. Upon his death, asuccession crisis followed, as the regentTôn Thất Thuyết orchestrated the murders of three emperors in a year. This presented an opportunity to the French. The Huế court was forced to sign theHarmand Convention in September 1883, which formalised the handover ofTonkin to the French administration. After theTreaty of Patenôtre was signed in 1884, France finished its annexation and partitioning of Vietnam into three constituent protectorates ofFrench Indochina, and turned the Nguyễn into a vassal monarchy.[62] Finally, theTreaty of Tientsin (1885) between the Chinese Empire and the French Republic was signed on 9 June 1885 recognizing French dominion over Vietnam.[63] All emperors afterĐồng Khánh were chosen by the French, and only ruled symbolically.

Gia Long period

[edit]

Nguyễn Phúc Ánh united Vietnam after a three-hundred-year division of the country. He celebrated his coronation at Huế on 1 June 1802 and proclaimed himself emperor (Vietnamese:Hoàng Đế), with theera name Gia Long (嘉隆). This title emphasized his rule from "Gia" Định region (modern-daySaigon) in the far south to Thăng "Long" (modern-dayHanoi) in the north.[64] Gia Long prioritized the nation's defense and worked to avoid another civil war. He replaced the feudal system with a reformistDoctrine of the Mean, based onConfucianism.[65][66] The Nguyen dynasty was founded as atributary state of the Qing Empire, with Gia Long receiving an imperial pardon and recognition as the ruler of Vietnam from theJiaqing Emperor for recognizing Chinesesuzerainty.[4][67] The envoys sent to China to acquire this recognition cited the ancient kingdom ofNanyue (Vietnamese:Nam Việt) to Emperor Jiaqing as the countries name, this displeased the emperor who was disconcerted by such pretentions, and Nguyễn Phúc Ánh had to officially rename his kingdom asVietnam the next year to satisfy the emperor.[68][64] The country was officially known as 'The (Great) Vietnamese state' (Vietnamese: Đại Việt Nam quốc),[69]

Gia Long asserted that he was reviving the bureaucratic state that was built by emperorLê Thánh Tông during the fifteenth-century golden age (1470–1497), as such he adopted a Confucian-bureaucratic government model, and sought unification with northern literati.[70] To ensure stability over the unified kingdom, he placed two of his most loyal and Confucian-educated advisors,Nguyễn Văn Thành andLê Văn Duyệt asviceroys of Hanoi and Saigon.[71] From 1780 to 1820, roughly 300 Frenchmen served Gia Long's court as officials.[72] Seeing the French influence in Vietnam with alarm, theBritish Empire sent two envoys to Gia Long in 1803 and 1804 to convince him to abandon his friendship with the French.[73] In 1808, a British fleet led byWilliam O'Bryen Drury mounted an attack on the Red River Delta, but was soon driven back by the Vietnamese navy and suffered several losses. After the Napoleonic War and Gia Long's death, the British Empire renewed relations with Vietnam in 1822.[74] During his reign, a system of roads connecting Hanoi, Hue, and Saigon with postal stations and inns was established, several canals connecting the Mekong River to theGulf of Siam were constructed and finished.[75][76] In 1812, Gia Long issued the Gia Long Code, which was instituted based on the Ch'ing Code of China, replaced the previous Thánh Tông's 1480 Code.[77][78][72] In 1811, acoup d'état broke out in theKingdom of Cambodia, a Vietnamese tributary state, forcing the pro-Vietnamese KingAng Chan II to seek support from Vietnam. Gia Long sent 13,000 men to Cambodia, successfully restoring his vassal to his throne,[79] and beginning a more formaloccupation of the country for the next 30 years, whileSiam seized northern Cambodia in 1814.[80]

Gia Long died in 1819 and was succeeded by his fourth son,Nguyễn Phúc Đảm, who soon became known as EmperorMinh Mạng (r. 1820–1841) of Vietnam.[81]

Rise and expansion under Minh Mạng

[edit]
Đại Nam (Nguyễn dynasty) under the reign of Emperor Minh Mạng.

Minh Mạng was the younger brother of princeNguyễn Phúc Cảnh and fourth son of Emperor Gia Long. Educated in Confucian principles from youth,[82] Minh Mạng became the Emperor of Vietnam in 1820, during a deadlycholeraoutbreak that ravaged and killed 200,000 people across the country.[83] His reign mainly focused on centralizing and stabilizing the state, by abolishing the Viceroy system and implementing a new full bureaucracy-provincial-based administration.[84] He also halted diplomacy with Europe, and cracked down on religious minorities.[85]

Minh Mạng shunned relations with the European powers. By 1824, after the death ofJean Marie Despiau, no Western advisors who had served Gia Long remained in Minh Mạng's court. The last French consul of Vietnam, Eugene Chaigneau, was never able to obtain audience with Minh Mạng. After he left, France ceased attempts at contact.[86] In the next year he launched an anti-Catholicism propaganda campaign, denouncing the religion as "vicious" and full of "false teaching." In 1832 Minh Mạng turned theChamPrincipality of Thuận Thành into a Vietnamese province, the final conquest in a long history ofcolonial conflict between Cham and Vietnam.[87] He coercively fed lizard and pig meat to Cham Muslims and cow meat to Cham Hindus in violation of their religions to forcibly assimilate them to Vietnamese culture.[88] The first Cham revolt for independence took place in 1833–1834 whenKatip Sumat, a Cham mullah who had just returned to Vietnam fromMecca declared a holy war (jihad) against the Vietnamese emperor.[89][90][91][92] The rebellion failed to gain the support of the Cham elite and was quickly suppressed by the Vietnamese military.[93] A second revolt began the following year, led by a Muslim clergy namedJa Thak with support from the old Cham royalty, highland people, and Vietnamese dissents. Minh Mạng mercilessly crushed the Ja Thak rebellion and executed the last Cham rulerPo Phaok The in early 1835.[94]

In 1833, as Minh Mạng had been trying to take firm control over the six southern provinces, a largerebellion led byLê Văn Khôi (an adopted son of the Saigon viceroyLê Văn Duyệt) broke out inSaigon, attempting to place Minh Mang's brotherPrince Cảnh on the throne.[95] The rebellion lasted for two years, gathering much support from Vietnamese Catholics, Khmers, Chinese merchants in Saigon, and even the Siamese rulerRama III until it was crushed by the government forces in 1835.[96][97][87] In January, he issued the first country-wide prohibition of Catholicism, and began persecuting Christians.[98][99] 130 Christian missionaries, priests and church leaders were executed, dozens of churches were burned and destroyed.[81]

Execution of French missionaryPierre Borie, 1838.

War with Siam and invasion of Cambodia

[edit]
Main article:Siamese–Vietnamese wars

Minh Mạng also expanded his empire westward, putting central and southern Laos under Cam Lộ Province, and collided with his father's former ally –Siam, in Vientiane and Cambodia.[100][101] He backed the revolt of Laotian kingAnouvong ofVientiane against the Siamese, and seizedXam Neua andSavannakhet in 1827.[101]

In 1834, the Vietnamese Crown fully annexed Cambodia and renamed it toTây Thành Province. Minh Mạng placed the generalTrương Minh Giảng as the governor of the Cambodian province, expanding his forcible religious assimilation to the new territory. KingAng Chan II of Cambodia died in the next year and Ming Mang installed Chan's daughterAng Mey as Commandery Princess of Cambodia.[102] Cambodian officials were required to wear Vietnamese-style clothing, and govern in Vietnamese style.[103] However the Vietnamese rule over Cambodia did not last long and proved draining to Vietnam's economy to maintain.[104] Minh Mạng died in 1841, while a Khmer uprising was in progress with Siamese support, putting an end to theTây Thành province and Vietnamese control of Cambodia.[105][106]

Decline of the Nguyễn dynasty

[edit]

Over the next forty years, Vietnam was ruled by two further independent emperorsThiệu Trị (r. 1841–1847) andTự Đức (r. 1848–1883). Thiệu Trị or Prince Miên Tông, was the eldest son of Emperor Minh Mạng. His six-year reign showed a significant decrease in Catholic persecution. With the population growing fast from 6 million in the 1820s to 10 million in 1850,[107] the attempts at agricultural self sufficiency were proving unworkable. Between 1802 and 1862, the court had faced 405 minor and large revolts of peasants, political dissents, ethnic minorities, Lê loyalists (people that were loyal to the old Lê Duy dynasty) across the country,[108] this made responding to the challenge of European colonisers significantly more challenging.

In 1845, the American warshipUSS Constitution landed inĐà Nẵng, taking all local officials hostage with the demands that Thiệu Trị free imprisoned French bishopDominique Lefèbvre.[109][110][111] In 1847, Thiệu Trị had made peace with Siam, but the imprisonment of Dominique Lefebvre offered an excuse for French and British aggression. In April the French navyattacked the Vietnamese and sank many Vietnamese ships in Đà Nẵng, demanding the release of Lefèbvre.[112][113][114] Angered by the incident, Thiệu Trị ordered all European documents in his palace to be smashed, and all European caught on Vietnamese land were to immediate execution.[115] In autumn, two British warships ofSir John Davis arrived in Đà Nẵng and attempted to force a commercial treaty on Vietnam, but the emperor refused. He died a few days later of apoplexy.[116]

Tự Đức, or Prince Hồng Nhậm was Thiệu Trị's youngest son, well-educated in Confucian learning, he was crowned by minister and co-regent Trương Đăng Quế. PrinceHồng Bảo-the elder brother of Tự Đức, the primogeniture heir rebelled against Tự Đức on the day of his accession.[117] This coup failed but he was spared execution on the intervention ofTừ Dụ, with his sentence being reduced to life imprisonment.[118] Aware of the rise of Western influences in Asia, Tự Đức confirmed his grandfathers isolationist policy towards the European powers, prohibiting embassies, forbidding trade and contact with foreigners and renewingthe persecution of Catholics his grandfather had orchestrated.[119] During Tự Đức's first twelve years, Vietnamese Catholics faced harsh persecution with 27 European missionaries, 300 Vietnamese priests and bishops, and 30,000 Vietnamese Christians executed and crucified from 1848 to 1860.[115]

In the late 1840s, anothercholera outbreak hit Vietnam, having travelled from India. The epidemic quickly spread out of control and killed 800,000 people (8–10% of Vietnam's 1847 population) across the Empire.[120] Locusts plagued northern Vietnam in 1854, and a major rebellion in the following year damaged much of the Tonkin countryside. These various crises weakened the empire's control over Tonkin considerably.[115]

In the 1850–70s, a new class of liberal intellectuals emerged in the court as persecution relaxed, many of them Catholics who had studied abroad in Europe, most notablyNguyễn Trường Tộ, who urged the emperor to reform and transform the Empire following the Western model and open Vietnam to the west.[121] Despite their efforts the conservative Confucian bureaucrats and Tự Đức himself had a literal interest in such reforms.[122][123] The economy remained largely agricultural, with 95% of the population living in rural areas, only mining offered potential to the modernist's dreams of a western-style state.

French conquest

[edit]
Further information:French conquest of Vietnam andCochinchina campaign
The Alliance (France-Spain) army capture ofCitadel of Saigon in 1859.
Treaty of Saigon (1862).

In September 1858, Napoleon III orchestrated a Franco-Spanish army bombardment and invadedĐà Nẵng to protest against the executions of two Spanish Dominican missionaries. Seven months later, they sailed to the south to attack Saigon and the rich Mekong Delta.[124] The Alliance troops held Saigon for two years, while a rebellion of Lê loyalists led by Catholic bishop PedroTạ Văn Phụng, who proclaimed himself to be a Lê prince, broke out in the north and escalated.[125][126] Alongside the pretext of avenging the death of the missionaries the French invasion was designed to prove to Europe that France wasn't a second-rate power, and 'civilize' the area. In February 1861, French reinforcement and 70 warships led by General Vassoigne arrived and overwhelmed the Vietnamese strongholds. Facing the Alliance invasion and internal rebellion, Tự Đức chose to cede three Southern provinces to France to deal with the coinciding rebellion.[127][128]

Vietnamese delegation toFrance in 20 September 1863 for peace treaty negotiation, 1st row from left to right: Ngụy Khác Đản,Phan Thanh Giản Head of legation (middle) and Phạm Phú Thứ.
Vietnamese mission toNapoleon III's court atTuileries Palace (1863).

In June 1862, theTreaty of Saigon was signed, resulting in Vietnam losing three southern provinces;Gia Định, Mỹ Tho, Biên Hòa which became the basis ofFrench Cochinchina. In theTreaty of Huế (1863) the island of Poulo Condoræ would allow Catholicism, three ports would be open to French trade, and the sea opened to allow French expansion intoKampuchea. and war reparations were required to be sent to France. Despite the religious elements of this treaty, France would not intervene in the Christian revolt inNorthern Vietnam, even with their missionaries urging them to. To the Queen dowager, Từ Dụ, the court, and the people, the 1862 treaty was a national humiliation. Tự Đức once again sent a mission to the French EmperorNapoleon III, in which he called to revise the 1862 treaty. In July 1864, another draft treaty was signed. France returned the three provinces to Vietnam, but still held control over three important cities Saigon, Mỹ Tho, and Thủ Dầu Một.[129] In 1866, France convinced Tự Đức to hand over the southern provinces of Vĩnh Long, Hà Tiên, and Châu Đốc.Phan Thanh Giản, the governor of the three provinces immediately resigned. Without resistance, in 1867, the French annexed the provinces and turned their attention to the northern provinces.[130]

By the late 1860s, pirates, bandits, and remnants of the Taiping rebellion in China, fled to Tonkin and turned Northern Vietnam into a hotbed for their raid activities. The Vietnamese state was too weak to fight against the pirates.[131] These Chinese rebels eventually formed their own mercenary armies as theBlack Flags had done and cooperated with local Vietnamese officials to interfere with French business interests. As France was looking to acquire Yunnan and Tonkin, when in 1873, a French merchant-adventurer namedJean Dupuis was intercepted by local Hanoi authority, theFrench Cochinchina government responded by sending out a new attack without talking with the Hue court.[132] A French army led byFrancis Garnier arrived at Tonkin in November. Because local administrators had allied with the Black Flags and mistrusted of Hanoi governorNguyễn Tri Phương, in late November the French and Lê loyalists opened fire at the Vietnamese citadel of Hanoi. Tự Đức immediately sent delegations to negotiate with Garnier, but PrinceHoàng Kế Viêm, governor ofSơn Tây, had enlisted the Chinese Black Flags militia ofLiu Yongfu to attack the French.[133] Garnier was killed on 21 December by the Black Flag soldiers at theBattle of Cầu Giấy [vi].[134] A peace negotiation between Vietnam and France was reached on 5 January 1874.[135] France formally recognized Vietnam's full independence from China; France would pay off Vietnam's Spanish debts; French force returned Hanoi to the Vietnamese; the Vietnamese military in Hanoi had to disband and be reduced to a simple police force; total religious and trade freedom was ensured; Vietnam was compelled to recognise all six southern provinces as French territories.[136][137]

End of independence (1874–1885)

[edit]
French victory atThuận An fortress, August 1883.

Just two years after French recognition, Tự Đức sent an embassy to Qing China in 1876 and re-provoked the tributary relationship with the Chinese (the last mission was in 1849). In 1878, Vietnam renewed relations with Thailand.[138] In 1880, Britain, Germany, and Spain were still debating the fate of Vietnam, and the Chinese Embassy in Paris openly rejected the 1874 Franco-Vietnamese agreement. In Paris, Prime MinisterJules Ferry proposed a direct military campaign against Vietnam to revise the 1874 treaty. Because Tự Đức was too preoccupied to keep the French out of his Empire without directly engaging against them, he requested assistance from the Chinese court. In 1882, 30,000 Qing troops flooded into the northern provinces and occupied cities. The Black Flags had also been returning, together, collaborating with local Vietnamese officials and harassing French businesses. In March, the French responded by sending a second expedition led byHenri Rivière to the north to deal with these various problems but had to avoid all international attention, particularly from China.[139] On 25 April 1882, Rivière took Hanoi without facing any resistance.[140][141] Tự Đức informed the Chinese court that their tributary state was being attacked. In September 1882, 17 Chinese divisions (200,000 men) crossed the Sino-Vietnamese borders and occupiedLạng Sơn, Cao Bằng, Bac Ninh, and Thái Nguyên, under the pretext of defending against the French aggression.[142]

  • Admiral Amédée Courbet and Harmand at Huế, August 1883
    AdmiralAmédée Courbet and Harmand at Huế, August 1883
  • Signing of the Treaty of Huế, 25 August 1883
    Signing of the Treaty of Huế, 25 August 1883
  • French propaganda painting in Hanoi, 1942
    French propaganda painting in Hanoi, 1942

Backed by the Chinese army and prince Hoàng Kế Viêm, Liu Yongfu, and the Black Flags decided to attack Rivière. On 19 May 1883, the Black Flags ambushed and beheaded Rivière at theSecond Battle of Cầu Giấy.[143] When news of Rivière's death reached France, there was immediate outcry and demands for a response. The French Parliament quickly voted for the conquest of Vietnam. Tens of thousands of French and Chinese reinforcements poured into theRed River Delta.[144]

Tự Đức died on 17 July.[145] Succession trouble temporarily paralyzed the court. One of his nephewsNguyễn Phúc Ưng Ái was crowned as Emperor Dục Đức but was, however, imprisoned and executed after three days by the three powerful regentsNguyễn Văn Tường,Tôn Thất Thuyết and Tran Tien Thanh for unknown reasons. Tự Đức's brotherNguyễn Phúc Hồng Dật succeeded on 30 July as Emperor Hiệp Hòa.[146] The senior Censorate official of the courtPhan Đình Phùng denounced the three regents for their irregular handling of Tự Đức's succession. Tôn Thất Thuyết excoriated Phan Đình Phùng and sent him from the court to his home territory, where later he led a nationalist resistance movement against the French for ten years.[147]

To knock Vietnam out of the war, France decided to take a direct assault on the city of Huế. The French army split up itself into two parts: the smaller under GeneralBouët stayed in Hanoi and waited for reinforcement from France while the French fleet led byAmédée Courbet and Jules Harmand sailed toThuận An, the sea gate of Hue on 17 August. Harmand demanded the two regents Nguyễn Văn Tường and Tôn Thất Thuyết surrender Northern Vietnam, North-Central Vietnam (Thanh Hoá,Nghệ An,Hà Tĩnh) andBình Thuận Province to French possession, and to accept a French résident in Huế who could demand imperial audiences. He sent an ultimatum to the regents that "The name Vietnam will no longer exist in history" if they did not comply with this.[148][149]

On 18 August, French battleships began shelling Vietnamese positions in the Thuận An citadel. Two days later, at dawn, Courbet and the French marines landed on the shore. By the next morning, all Vietnamese defenses in Huế were overwhelmed by the French. Emperor Hiệp Hòa dispatched mandarin Nguyễn Thượng Bắc to negotiate.[150]

On 25 September, two court officials, Trần Đình Túc and Nguyễn Trọng Hợp signed a twenty-seven-article treaty known asHarmand Convention.[151] The French were granted Bình Thuận; Đà Nẵng and Qui Nhơn were opened for trade; the ruling sphere of the Vietnamese monarchy was reduced to Central Vietnam while Northern Vietnam became a French Protectorate. In November, Emperor Hiệp Hòa and Trần Tiễn Thành were executed by Nguyễn Văn Tường and Tôn Thất Thuyết for their perceived pro-French sympathies. 14-year-old Nguyễn Phúc Ưng Đăng was crowned as EmperorKiến Phúc. After achieving peace with China through theTientsin Accord in May 1884, on 6 June the French Ambassador in ChinaJules Patenôtre des Noyers signed with Nguyen Van Tuong the ProtectorateTreaty of Patenôtre, which confirmed French dominion over Vietnam.[152][62] On 31 May 1885, France appointed the first governor of all Vietnam.[153] On 9 June 1885, Vietnam ceased to exist after 83 years as an independent state.[63] The leader of the pro-war faction, Tôn Thất Thuyết and his supporters revolted against the French in July 1885, but were forced to retreat to the Laotian highlands with the young emperorHàm Nghi (Nguyễn Phúc Ưng Lịch.) Meanwhile the French installed his pro-French brother Nguyễn Phúc Ưng Kỷ as emperorĐồng Khánh.[154] Thuyết called up the nobility, loyalists and nationalists to arm for the resistance against the French occupation (Cần Vương movement).[155] The movement lasted for 11 years (1885–1896) and Thuyết was forced to exile in China in 1888.[156]

French protectorates of Annam and Tonkin (1883–1945)

[edit]
Main articles:Annam (French protectorate),Tonkin (French protectorate), andFrench Indochina

The1883 Treaty of Huế led to the rest of Vietnam becoming French protectorates, divided into theProtectorates of Annam andTonkin. The terms were, however, considered overly harsh in French diplomatic circles and never ratified in France. The following1884 Treaty of Huế provided a softened version of the previous treaty.[157] The1885 Treaty of Tientsin, which reaffirmed the 1884Tientsin Accord and ended theSino-French War, confirmed Vietnam's status as French protectorates and severed Vietnam's tributary relationship with the Qing dynasty by requiring that all of Vietnam's foreign affairs be conducted through France.[158]

After this the Nguyễn dynasty only nominally ruled the two French protectorates. Annam and Tonkin were combined with Cochinchina and the neighboringCambodian protectorate in 1887 to form the Union ofFrench Indochina, of which they became administrative components.[157]

French rule also reinforced ingredients that the Portuguese had already added to Vietnam's cultural stew: Catholicism and aLatin-basedalphabet. The spelling used in the Vietnamese transliteration is in fact Portuguese-based, because the French relied on a dictionary compiled earlier by a Portuguese cleric,Francisco de Pina.[157] Due to their presence inMacau, thePortuguese were also the ones who broughtCatholicism to Vietnam in the XVI Century, although it was the French who built most of the churches and established missions in the country.[159][160]

World War I

[edit]
Main article:History of Vietnam during World War I

While seeking to maximize the use of Indochina's natural resources and manpower to fight World War I, France cracked down on Vietnam's patriotic mass movements. Indochina (mainly Vietnam) had to provide France with 70,000 soldiers and 70,000 workers, who were forcibly drafted from villages to serve on the French battlefront. Vietnam also contributed 184 millionpiastres in loans and 336,000 tons of food.

These burdens proved heavy since agriculture experienced natural disasters from 1914 to 1917. Lacking a unified nationwide organization, the vigorous Vietnamese national movement failed to use the difficulties France had as a result of the war to stage significant uprisings.

In May 1916, sixteen-year-old emperorDuy Tân escaped from his palace to participate in an uprising of Vietnamese troops. The French were informed of the plan, and its leaders were arrested and executed. Duy Tân was deposed and exiled to the island ofRéunion in the Indian Ocean. Nguyen Dong Xi had died of pneumonia.

World War II

[edit]
Main articles:1940–1946 in French Indochina andFrench Indochina in World War II

Nationalist sentiment intensified in Vietnam (especially during and after the First World War), but uprisings and tentative efforts failed to obtain concessions from the French. TheRussian Revolution greatly impacted 20th-century Vietnamese history.

For Vietnam, the outbreak of World War II on 1 September 1939 was as decisive as the 1858 French seizure of Đà Nẵng. TheAxis power ofJapan invaded Vietnam on 22 September 1940, attempting to construct military bases to strike againstAllied forces in Southeast Asia. This led to a period of Indochina underJapanese occupation with the cooperation of thecollaborationistVichy French, who still retained the administration of the colony. During this time theViet Minh, a communist resistance movement, developed underHo Chi Minh from 1941, withallied support. During 1944–1945famine in northern Vietnam, over one million people starved to death.

Empire of Vietnam (1945)

[edit]
Main articles:Empire of Vietnam andAbdication of Bảo Đại

In March 1945, after theliberation of France and heavy setbacks in the war, the Japanese in a last ditch effort to gather support in Indochinaoverthrew the French administration, imprisoned their civil servants and proclaimed independence forCambodia,Laos and Vietnam, which became theEmpire of Vietnam withBảo Đại as its Emperor.[8][9] The Empire of Vietnam was apuppet state of theEmpire of Japan.[8] After theSurrender of Japan, Bảo Đại abdicated on 25 August 1945 after the Viet Minh launched theAugust Revolution.[161]

This ended the 143-year reign of the Nguyễn dynasty. Bảo Đại was later restored to power by the French to become emperor of theState of Vietnam in 1949 until the country became arepublic in 1955, however this period is not considered part of the Nguyễn Dynasty.[1]

National administration

[edit]

Government

[edit]
Main article:Government of the Nguyễn dynasty

Emperor

[edit]
Main article:House of Nguyễn Phúc
  • Imperial seal, decorated with a dragon, and its imprint against a red background.
    Imperial seal, decorated with a dragon, and its imprint against a red background.
  • Nine-dragon Imperial Crown (Cửu Long thông thiên quan, 九龍通天冠) influenced by Chinese Yishan guan (翼善冠).
    Nine-dragon Imperial Crown (Cửu Long thông thiên quan, 九龍通天冠) influenced by ChineseYishan guan (翼善冠).
  • Imperial sword and hunting rifle of emperor Minh Mang.
    Imperial sword and hunting rifle of emperor Minh Mang.
  • Hoàng Việt luật lệ (皇越律例), Code of law introduced by Gia Long.
    Hoàng Việt luật lệ (皇越律例), Code of law introduced by Gia Long.
  • Court dress of Emperor.
    Court dress of Emperor.
The visit of Bảo Đại to the ancestral tombs of theNguyễn lords inThanh Hóa, 4 November 1932.

The Nguyễn dynasty retained the bureaucratic and hierarchic system of previous dynasties. The emperor was the head of state who wielded absolute authority. Under the emperor was the Ministry of Interior (which worked on papers, imperial messages and recording) and four Grand Secretariats (Vietnamese:Tứ trụ Đại thần), later renamed the Ministry of Secret Council.[162][163][164]

The Emperor of the Nguyễn dynasty was anabsolutist ruler, which means he was both thehead of state and thehead of government.[165] The Gia Long Code in 1812 declared the Vietnamese monarch as the universal ruler of all Vietnam; using the Confucian conceptMandate of Heaven to provide monarchs absolute power. Their reign and popular images were judged based on how prosperous the livelihood (民生,dân sinh) of the people and the Confucian concept ofchính danh (rectification of names), where according to the Confucian biblicalAnalects, everything has to stay in its right order.[166][167] Gia Long also perceived the ancient Chinese conception ofHua-Yi and in 1805 he confessed his Empire asTrung Quốc (中國, "theMiddle Kingdom"), the Vietnamese term which often refers to China but now was taken by Gia Long to emphasis his Son of Heaven status and the devaluation of China.[168][169] Following next decades, Confucianism and the Mandate of Heaven theory gradually lost their positions among the Vietnamese officials and intellectuals. When the fourth emperor, Tự Đức, ceded Southern Vietnam to France and called all Southern officials to give up arms, many ignored, disobeyed the Son of Heaven and continued to fight against invaders. Many dissents viewed him as surrendering and frightened of France. Rebellions against Tự Đức erupted every year from 1860 until he died in 1883.[170]

A dual theory of sovereignty existed in Vietnam. All the Nguyễn monarchs were addressed ashoàng đế (黃帝, Sino-Vietnamese title for "Emperor") in the court while referring himself the first person honorifictrẫm (he who give the order). They also used the concept ofthiên tử (天子, "Son of Heaven", which is borrowed from China) to demonstrate that the ruler was descended and commissioned by heaven to rule the kingdom.[166] However, in most cases, Nguyen rulers were formally calledvua (𪼀, theVietnamese title for "monarch" or " sovereign ruler") by the ordinary Vietnamese folks.[171][172] The concept of a divine Son of Heaven has not been dogmatically practiced, and the monarch's divinity was not absolute due to the dual theory. For example,Xu Jiyu, a Chinese geographer, reported that the bureaucrats in the Vietnamese court sat down and even felt free to search themselves for body lice during the court audiences. Gia Long once told the son of J.B. Chaigneau, one of his advisors, that the use of Son of Heaven in Vietnam was an "absurdity" and "at least in mixed Vietnamese–European Company."[172] Once the young crown prince is chosen to succeed, his obligation is to be filial with parents, be well-educated in politics and classics, and internalize the morals and ethics of a ruler.[173]

After the 1884 Treaty of Huế was signed, the Nguyễn dynasty became two protectorates of France and the French installed their own administrators.[174] Although the Emperors of the Nguyễn dynasty were still nominally in control of the protectorates of Annam and Tonkin, theResident-Superior of Annam gradually gained more influence over the imperial court inHuế.[174] In 1897 the Resident-Superior was granted the power to appoint the Nguyễn dynasty Emperors and presided over the meetings of theViện cơ mật.[174] These moves incorporated French officials directly into the administrative structure of the Imperial Huế Court and further legitimized French rule in the legislative branch of the Nguyễn government.[174] From this period onwards any imperial edicts issued by the Emperors of Đại Nam had to be confirmed by the Resident-Superior of Annam giving him both legislative and executive power over the Nguyễn government.[174]

In the year 1898, the federal government ofFrench Indochina took over the financial and property management duties of the Nguyễn dynasty's imperial court meaning that the Nguyễn dynasty Emperor (at the timeThành Thái) became a salaried employee of the Indochinese colonial structure, reducing their power to being only a civil servant of the Protectorate government.[174] The Resident-Superior of Annam also took over the management of provincialmandarins and was a member of the Supreme Council (Conseil supérieur) of the Government-General of French Indochina.[174]

Civil service and bureaucracy

[edit]
  • The imperial guards of the Nguyễn dynasty.
    The imperial guards of the Nguyễn dynasty.
  • The eunuchs of the Nguyễn dynasty.
    The eunuchs of the Nguyễn dynasty.
  • Imperial family member (left) in the traditional Áo tấc and mandarin (right) in the imperial court dress.
    Imperial family member (left) in the traditional Áo tấc and mandarin (right) in the imperial court dress.
  • Mandarin conducted ceremony in front of Imperial palace in 1939.
    Mandarin conducted ceremony in front ofImperial palace in 1939.
RankCivil positionMilitary positionPictures
Upper first rank (Bậc trên nhất phẩm)Imperial Clan Court (Tông Nhân Phủ,Tôn nhân lệnh)
Three Ducal Ministers (Tam công):
* Grand Preceptor (Thái sư)
* Grand Tutor (Thái phó)
* Grand Protector (Thái bảo)
Same
Dress code of imperial members (Hoàng Thân,皇親),Nam Giao ceremonial dress (left) and court dress (right).
First senior rank (Chánh nhất phẩm,正一品)Left Right Imperial Clan Court (Tôn nhân phủ,Tả Hữu tôn chính")
Three Vice-Ducal Ministers (Tam Thiếu)
* Vice Preceptor (Thiếu sư)
* Vice Tutor (Thiếu phó)
* Vice Protector (Thiếu bảo)
Same
Dress code of first senior rank of civil mandarins.
First junior rank (Tòng nhất phẩm.從一品)Council of State (Tham chính viện)
House of Councillors (Tham Nghị viện)
Grand Secretariat (Thị trung Đại học sĩ)
Banner Unit Lieutenant General, General-in-Chief, Provincial Commander-in-Chief
Dress code of first senior (left) and junior (right) rank of military mandarins.
Second senior rank (Chánh nhị phẩm,正二品)6 ministries (Lục bộ):
*Ministry of Personnel (Lại Bộ)
*Ministry of Rites (Lễ Bộ)
*Ministry of Justice (imperial China) (Hình Bộ)
*Ministry of Finance (Hộ Bộ)
*Ministry of Public Works (Công Bộ)
*Ministry of Defense (Binh Bộ)
SupremeCensorate (Đô sát viện,Tả Hữu Đô ngự sử)
Banner Captain General, Commandants of Divisions, Brigade General
Second junior rank (Tòng nhị phẩm,從二品)6 Ministerial Advisors (Lục bộ Tả Hữu Tham tri)
Grand coordinator and provincial governor (Tuần phủ)
Supreme Vice-Censorate (Đô sát viện,Tả Hữu Phó đô ngự sử)
Major General, Colonel
Dress code of second senior (left) & junior (right) rank of military mandarins.
Third senior rank (Chánh tam phẩm,正三品)Senior Head of 6 Ministries (Chánh thiêm sự)
Administration Commissioner (Cai bạ)
Surveillance Commissioner (Ký lục)
State Auxiliary Academician ofSecretariat (Thị trung Trực học sĩ)
Court Auxiliary Academician (Trực học sĩ các điện)
Court academician (Học sĩ các điện)
Provincial governor (Hiệp trấn các trấn)
Brigadiers of Artillery & Musketry, Brigadier of Scouts, Banner Division Colonel
Third senior (left) and junior (right) rank of military mandarin
Third junior rank (Tòng tam phẩm,從三品)Junior Head of Six Ministries (Thiếu thiêm sự)
Senior Palace Administration Commissioner (Cai bạ Chính dinh)
Chargé d'affaires (Tham tán)
Court of Imperial Seals (Thượng bảo tự)
General Staff (Tham quân)
Banner Brigade Commander
Fourth senior rank (Chánh tứ phẩm,正四品)Provincial Education Commissioner ofGuozijian (Quốc tử giám Đốc học)
Head of six ministries (Thiếu thiêm sự)
Junior Court of Imperial Seals (Thượng bảo thiếu Khanh)
Grand Secretaries (Đông các học sĩ)
Administration Commissioner of Trường Thọ palace (Cai bạ cung Trường Thọ)
Provincial Advisor to Defense Command Lieutenant Governor (Tham hiệp các trấn)
Lieutenant Colonel of Artillery, Musketry & Scouts Captain, Police Major
Fourth junior rank (Tòng tứ phẩm,從四品)Provincial Vice Education Commissioner of Guozijian (Quốc tử giám phó Đốc học), Prefect (Tuyên phủ sứ),Captain, Assistant Major in Princely Palaces
Fifth senior rank (Chánh ngũ phẩm,正五品)Inner Deputy Supervisors of Instruction at Hanlin Institutes, Sub-PrefectsPolice Captain, Lieutenant or First Lieutenant
Fifth senior (left) and junior (right) rank of civil mandarin.
Fifth junior rank (Tòng ngũ phẩm,從五品)Assistant Instructors and Librarians at Imperial and Hanlin Institutes, Assistant Directors of Boards and Courts, Circuit CensorsGate Guard Lieutenants, Second Captain
Fifth senior (left) and junior (right) rank of military mandarin.
Sixth senior rank (Chánh lục phẩm,正六品)Secretaries & Tutors at Imperial & Hanlin Institutes, Secretaries and Registrars at Imperial Offices, Police MagistrateBodyguards, Lieutenants of Artillery, Musketry & Scouts, Second Lieutenants
Sixth junior rank (Tòng lục phẩm,從六品)Assistant Secretaries in Imperial Offices and Law Secretaries, Provincial Deputy Sub-Prefects, Buddhist & Taoist priestsDeputy Police Lieutenant
Seventh senior rank (Chánh thất phẩm,正七品)NoneCity Gate Clerk, Sub-Lieutenants
Seventh senior (left) and junior (right) rank of mandarin.
Seventh junior rank (Tòng thất phẩm,從七品)Secretaries in Offices of Assistant Governors, Salt Controllers & Transport StationsAssistant Major in Nobles' Palaces
Eighth senior rank (Chánh bát phẩm,正八品)NoneEnsigns
Eighth junior rank (Tòng bát phẩm,從八品)Sub-director of Studies, Archivists in Office of Salt ControllerFirst Class Sergeant
Ninth senior rank (Chánh cửu phẩm,正九品)NoneSecond Class Sergeant
Ninth senior rank (left) and junior rank mandarin (right)
Ninth junior rank (Tòng cửu phẩm,從九品)Prefectural Tax Collector, Deputy Jail Warden, Deputy Police Commissioner, Tax ExaminerThird Class Sergeant, Corporal, First & Second Class Privates

Taxes

[edit]
icon
This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(September 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Nine coins, with pictures of their respective emperors
Nguyễn dynasty coins

Vietnam's monetary subunit was the quan (貫). One quan equaled 10 coins, equivalent to600. In 1839, Emperor Minh Mạng determined that officials received the following taxes (Vietnamese:thuế đầu người):[175]

  • First senior rank (Chánh nhất phẩm): 400 quan; rice: 300 kg; per-capita tax: 70 quan
  • First junior rank (Tòng nhất phẩm): 300 quan; rice: 250 kg; tax: 60 quan
  • Second senior rank (Chánh nhị phẩm): 250 quan; rice: 200 kg; tax: 50 quan
  • Second junior rank (Tòng nhị phẩm): 180 quan; rice: 150 kg; tax: 30 quan
  • Third senior rank (Chánh tam phẩm): 150 quan; rice: 120 kg; tax: 20 quan
  • Third junior rank (Tòng tam phẩm): 120 quan; rice: 90 kg; tax: 16 quan
  • Fourth senior rank (Chánh tứ phẩm): 80 quan; rice: 60 kg; tax: 14 quan
  • Fourth junior rank (Tòng tứ phẩm): 60 quan; rice: 50 kg; tax: 10 quan
  • Fifth senior rank (Chánh ngũ phẩm): 40 quan; rice: 43 kg; tax: 9 quan
  • Fifth junior rank (Tòng ngũ phẩm): 35 quan; rice: 30 kg; tax: 8 quan
  • Sixth senior rank (Chánh lục phẩm): 30 quan; rice: 25 kg; tax: 7 quan
  • Sixth junior rank (Tòng lục phẩm): 30 quan; rice: 22 kg; tax: 6 quan
  • Seventh senior rank (Chánh thất phẩm): 25 quan; rice: 20 kg; tax: 5 quan
  • Seventh junior rank (Tòng thất phẩm): 22 quan; rice: 20 kg; tax: 5 quan
  • Eighth senior rank (Chánh bát phẩm): 20 quan; rice: 18 kg; tax: 5 quan
  • Eighth junior rank (Tòng bát phẩm): 20 quan; rice: 18 kg; tax: 4 quan
  • Ninth senior rank (Chánh cửu phẩm): 18 quan; rice: 16 kg; tax: 4 quan
  • Ninth junior rank (Tòng cửu phẩm): 18 quan; rice: 16 kg; tax: 4 quan

Officials from the first to third ranks received taxes twice a year, while those from the fourth to seventh ranks received taxes at the end of the four seasons. The eighth and ninth-ranked officials did so every month in a year.[176] The Emperor also granted an annual "dưỡng liêm" money to prevent corruption among regional administrators.[177]

Political organization

[edit]
Further information:Six Ministries of the Nguyễn dynasty
  • Privy Council of Nguyễn Dynasty (Cơ Mật Viện: 機密院).
    Privy Council of Nguyễn Dynasty (Cơ Mật Viện: 機密院).
  • Ministry of Administration of Nguyễn Dynasty (Lại Bộ : 吏部).
    Ministry of Administration of Nguyễn Dynasty (Lại Bộ : 吏部).
  • Ministry of Rites of Nguyễn Dynasty (Lễ Bộ: 禮部).
    Ministry of Rites of Nguyễn Dynasty (Lễ Bộ: 禮部).
  • Ministry of Finance of Nguyễn Dynasty (Hộ Bộ: 戸部).
    Ministry of Finance of Nguyễn Dynasty (Hộ Bộ: 戸部).
  • Ministry of Public Works of Nguyễn Dynasty (Công Bộ: 工部).
    Ministry of Public Works of Nguyễn Dynasty (Công Bộ: 工部).
  • Tôn Thất Đàn, Minister of Justice of Nguyễn Dynasty (Hình Bộ : 刑部).
    Tôn Thất Đàn, Minister of Justice of Nguyễn Dynasty (Hình Bộ : 刑部).
  • Imperial Academy, Huế under Ministry of Education of Nguyễn Dynasty (Học Bộ : 學部).
    Imperial Academy, Huế under Ministry of Education of Nguyễn Dynasty (Học Bộ : 學部).
  • Phục mạng ceremony when mandarin receive the edict from the Emperor in 1895.
    Phục mạng ceremony when mandarin receive the edict from the Emperor in 1895.

Education system

[edit]
Main article:Confucian court examination system in Vietnam

Colonial education

[edit]
  • Tailoring class in a colonial school in Hanoi, Tonkin
    Tailoring class in a colonial school inHanoi, Tonkin
  • Geography class in a colonial school. Hanoi, 1920
    Geography class in a colonial school. Hanoi, 1920

Pension

[edit]

When mandarins retired, they could receive one hundred to four hundred quan from the emperor. When they died, the imperial court provided twenty to two hundred quan for a funeral.[citation needed]

Administrative divisions

[edit]
Main article:Flags of the Nguyễn dynasty's administrative units

Under Gia Long

[edit]

During the reign of Gia Long, the kingdom was divided into twenty-three quasi-militant protectoratestrấn and four military departmentsdoanh.[178] Each protectorate, besides having their own separated regional governments, was under patrol of one greater, powerful unit called Overlord of Citadel, or theViceroy. For examples, the northern protectorates hadBắc thành Tổng trấn (Viceroy of Northern Protectorates) in Hanoi, and southern protectorates hadGia Định thành Tổng trấn (Viceroy of Gia Định Protectorates) resides inSaigon.[179] Two famously viceroys during Gia Long's reign wereNguyễn Văn Thành (Hanoi) andLê Văn Duyệt (Saigon). By 1802, these were:

  • 16 protectorates under joint-governance from the Viceroys.
  1. Sơn Nam Thượng (Hanoi)
  2. Sơn Nam Hạ (Nam Định)
  3. Sơn Tây
  4. Kinh Bắc (Bắc Ninh)
  5. Hải Dương
  6. Tuyên Quang
  7. Hưng Hoá
  8. Cao Bằng
  9. Lạng Sơn
  10. Thái Nguyên
  11. Quảng Yên
  12. Gia Định or Phiên An
  13. Biên Hoà
  14. Vĩnh Thanh (later becameVĩnh Long andAn Giang
  15. Định Tường (Tiền Giang)
  16. Hà Tiên
  • 7 Central protectorates
  1. Thanh Hoá
  2. Nghệ An
  3. Quảng Nghĩa (Quảng Ngãi)
  4. Bình Định
  5. Phú Yên
  6. Bình Hoà (Khánh Hoà)
  7. Bình Thuận
  • 4 departments surroundingHuế, directly ruled by Gia Long.
  1. Quảng Đức
  2. Quảng Bình
  3. Quảng Trị
  4. Quảng Nam

Minh Mạng and later

[edit]

In 1831, Minh Mạng reorganised his kingdom by converting all these protectorates into 31 provinces (tỉnh). Each province had a series of smaller jurisdictions: the prefecture (phủ), the subprefecture (châu, in areas whereas having a significant population of ethnic minorities). Under prefecture and subprefecture, there was the district (huyện), the canton (tổng). Under district and canton, the bundle of hamlets around one common religious temple or social factor point, the village(làng or the commune) was the lowest administrative unit, which one respected person nominally took care of village administrative, which called lý trưởng.[180]

Two nearby provinces were combined into a pair. Every pair had a governor-general (Tổng đốc) and a governor (Tuần phủ).[181] Frequently, there were twelve governor-generals and eleven governors, although, in some periods, the Emperor would appoint a "commissioner in charge of patrolled borderlands" (kinh lược sứ) that supervising entire northern of the southern part of the kingdom.[182] In 1803, Vietnam had 57 prefectures, 41 subprefectures, 201 districts, 4,136 cantons and 16,452 villages, and then by the 1840s its had been increased to 72 prefectures, 39 subprefectures and 283 districts, which an average 30,000 people per district.[180] Cambodia had been absorbed into the Vietnamese administrative system, bore the nameTây Thành Province from 1834 to 1845.[183] With areas having minority groups likeTày,Nùng, Mèo (Hmong people),Mường,Mang andJarai, the Huế court imposed the co-existing tributary and quasi-bureaucratic governance system, while allowing these people to have their own local rulers and autonomy.[184]

Map of 1883 Indochina Peninsula, shows three Vietnamese regions and client territories (Pays des Mois and Royme de Tran-ninh) of the Vietnamese Crown.

In 1832, there were:

  • Three regions and 31 provinces (encompassed modern-day Vietnam):[185]
  1. Bắc Kỳ (Tonkin)
    1. Hanoi
    2. Lạng Sơn
    3. Cao Bằng
    4. Bắc Ninh
    5. Thái Nguyên
    6. Nam Định
    7. Hưng Yên
    8. Sơn Tây
    9. Hưng Hoá
    10. Tuyên Quang
    11. Hải Dương
    12. Quảng Yên
    13. Ninh Bình
  2. Trung Kỳ (Annam)
    1. Thanh Hoá
    2. Nghệ An
    3. Hà Tĩnh
    4. Quảng Bình
    5. Quảng Trị
    6. Thừa Thiên
    7. Quảng Nam
    8. Quảng Ngãi
    9. Bình Định
    10. Phú Yên
    11. Khánh Hoà
    12. Bình Thuận
  3. Nam Kỳ (Cochinchina)
    1. Biên Hoà
    2. Gia Định
    3. Vĩnh Long
    4. Định Tường
    5. An Giang
    6. Hà Tiên
  • Client/dependent territories:[186]
  1. Luang Phrabang
  2. Vientine
  3. Cambodia
  4. Jarai chiefdoms
  • Chief cities:
  1. Huế, capital city, population (1880): 30,000
  2. Hanoi, major city, population (1880): 120,000
  3. Saigon, major city, population (1880): 100,000

Economy

[edit]
Main article:Economy of the Nguyễn dynasty until 1884

Society

[edit]

Culture and cultural discrimination

[edit]

The Nguyễn dynasty viewed cultures that were "non-Chinese" as barbaric and called themselves the Central Kingdom (Trung Quốc, 中國).[187] This includes the Han Chinese under the Qing dynasty who were viewed as "non-Chinese". As the Qing have caused the Chinese to not be "Han" anymore. Chinese were referred to as"Thanh nhân" (清人). This occurred after Vietnam had sent a delegate to Beijing, whereupon a diplomatic disaster caused Vietnam to view other "non-Chinese" as barbaric in much the same way as the Qing.[188] By theNguyễn dynasty the Vietnamese themselves were ordering Cambodian Khmer to adoptVietnamese culture by ceasing "barbarous" habits like cropping hair and ordering them to grow it long besides making them replace skirts with trousers.[189] Han Chinese Ming dynasty refugees numbering 3,000 came to Vietnam at the end of the Ming dynasty. They opposed the Qing dynasty and were fiercely loyal to the Ming dynasty. Vietnamese women married these Han Chinese refugees since most of them were soldiers and single men. They did not wear Manchu hairstyle unlikelater Chinese migrants to Vietnam during the Qing dynasty.[190]

Vietnamisation of ethnic minorities

[edit]
AĐồng Khánh-period text regarding the demographics of theHưng Hóa Province referring to the ethnic groups as "Hán (-Vietnamese)" (漢), "Thanh" (清), and "Thổ" (土). This indicates that during the beginning of the period of French domination the Vietnamese still maintained the "Hoa-Di distinction" while the indigenous peoples and the subjects of the Manchu Qing (Thanh) dynasty were viewed as "less civilised".

Under emperor Minh Mạngsinicisation of ethnic minorities became state policy. He claimed the legacy of Confucianism and China'sHan dynasty for Vietnam, and used the term "Han people" (漢人,Hán nhân) to refer to the Vietnamese.[191][192] According to the emperor, "We must hope that their barbarian habits will be subconsciously dissipated, and that they will daily become more infected by Han [Sino-Vietnamese] customs."[193] These policies were directed at theKhmer andhill tribes.[194] Nguyễn Phúc Chu had referred to the Vietnamese as "Han people" in 1712, distinguishing them from the Chams.[195] The Nguyễn lords establishedcolonies after 1790. Gia Long said,"Hán di hữu hạn" (, "The Vietnamese and the barbarians must have clear borders"), distinguishing theKhmer from the Vietnamese.[196] Minh Mang implemented anacculturation policy for minority non-Vietnamese peoples.[197]"Thanh nhân" ( referring to theQing dynasty) or"Đường nhân" (唐人 referring to theTang dynasty) were used to refer toethnic Chinese by the Vietnamese, who called themselves"Hán dân" () and"Hán nhân" (漢人 referring to theHan dynasty) during 19th-century Nguyễn rule.[198] Since 1827, descendants ofMing dynasty refugees were calledMinh nhân (明人) orMinh Hương () by Nguyễn rulers, to distinguish with ethnic Chinese.[199]Minh nhân were treated as Vietnamese since 1829.[200][201]: 272  They were not allowed to go to China, and also not allowed to wearthe Manchu queue.[202]

Clothing

[edit]

The Nguyễn dynasty popularizedQing-influenced clothing.[203][204][205][206][207][208] Trousers were adopted by femaleWhite H'mong speakers,[209] replacing their traditional skirts.[210] The Qing-influenced tunics and trousers were worn by the Vietnamese. Theáo dài was developed in the 1920s, when compact, close-fittingtucks were added to predecessor of the áo dài,áo ngũ thân.[211] Chinese-influenced trousers and tunics were ordered by lordNguyễn Phúc Khoát during the 18th century, replacing traditional Vietnameseáo tràng vạt derived from Chinesejiaoling youren (Chinese: 交領右衽).[212] Although the Chinese-influenced trousers and tunic were mandated by the Nguyen government, skirts were worn in isolated north Vietnamese hamlets until the 1920s.[213] Chinese style clothing was ordered for the Vietnamese military and bureaucrats byNguyễn Phúc Khoát.[214]

An 1841polemic, "On Distinguishing Barbarians", was based on the Qing sign "Vietnamese Barbarians' Hostel" (越夷會館) on theFujian residence of Nguyen diplomat andHoa Chinese Lý Văn Phức.[215][216][217][218] It argued that the Qing did not subscribe to the neo-Confucianist texts from theSong and Ming dynasties which were learned by the Vietnamese,[219] who saw themselves as sharing a civilization with the Qing.[220] This event triggered a diplomatic disaster. The consequence was that non-"Han Chinese highland tribes" and other non-Vietnamese peoples living near (or in) Vietnam were called "barbarian" by the Vietnamese imperial court.[221][222] The essay distinguishes the Yi and Hua, and mentions Zhao Tuo, Wen, Shun and Taibo.[223]Kelley and Woodside described Vietnam's Confucianism.[224]

Emperors Minh Mạng,Thiệu Trị andTự Đức, were opposed to French involvement in Vietnam, and tried to reduce the country's growingCatholic community. The imprisonment of missionaries who had illegally entered the country was the primary pretext for the French to invade (and occupy)Indochina. Like Qing China, a number of incidents involved other European nations during the 19th century.

Religion

[edit]
Buddhist monks in South Vietnam, 1828

Although the previousNguyễn lords were faithfulBuddhists, Gia Long was not a Buddhist. He adoptedNeo-Confucianism and actively restricted Buddhism. Scholars, elites, and officials attacked Buddhist doctrines and criticized them as superstitious and useless. The third emperor,Thiệu Trị, elevated Confucianism as the true religion and while regarding Buddhism as superstition.[225]

Church of Sơn Tây in 1884.

Building new Buddhist pagodas and temples were forbidden.Buddhist clergies andnuns were forced to join public works to limit the influence of Buddhism and promote Confucianism as the sole dominant belief of the society. However, such embracing a Sinic Confucian culture among the Vietnamese populace whom lived amidst a Southeast Asian infrastructure, widening the distance between the population and the court far away.[226] Buddhism was still prevalent in mainstream society and had its presence within the imperial palace. Empress mothers, queens, princess, and concubines were devout Buddhists, despite the patriarchal prohibition.

The panorama ofNam Giao procession

Confucianism itself was the ideology of the Nguyen court, also provided the basic core of classical education and civil examination every year. Gia Long pursuedConfucianism to create and maintain a conservative society and social structures. Confucian rituals and ideas were circulations based within ancient Confucian teaching such asThe Analects andSpring and Autumn Annals in Vietnamese-script collections.[227] The court rigidly imported these Chinese books from Chinese merchants. Confucian rituals such ascầu đảo (offering heaven for wind and rain during a drought) that the emperor and court officials perform for wishing heaven to rain down his kingdom.[228] If the offer went successful, they had to conductlễ tạ (thanksgiving ritual) to heaven. In addition, the emperor believed that holy spirits and natural goddesses of his country can also make rain. In 1804, Gia Long built the Nam Hải Long Vương Temple (Temple of Southern Ocean Dragon King) in Thuận An, northeast of Hue in his faithfulness to the god of Thuận An (Thần Thuận An), the place where most ofcầu đảo ritual was performed.[229] His successor, Minh Mạng, continued to build several temples dedicated to theVũ Sư (Rainmaking god) and altars forThần Mây (Cloud God) andThần Sấm (Thunder God).[230]

Vietnamese Buddhist monks in Hanoi

Nguyễn Trường Tộ, a prominent Catholic and reformist intellectual, launched an attack on Confucian structures in 1867 as decadent. He wrote to Tự Đức: "the evil that has been brought on China and on our country by the Confucian way of life." He criticized the court's Confucian education as dogmatic and unrealistic, promoted for his education reform.[231]

During Gia Long's years, Catholicism was peacefully worshipped without any restriction. Began with Minh Mạng, who considered Christianity as a heterodox religion for its rejection of ancestor worship, the important belief of the Vietnamese monarchy. After reading the Bible (Old and New Testament), he considered the Christian religion irrational and ridiculous, and praisedTokugawa Japan for its notorious policies on Christians. Minh Mạng also was influenced by anti-Christian propaganda written by Vietnamese Confucian officials and literati, which described the mixing of men and women and liberal society among the Church. The most thing he worried about Christianity and Catholicism was writing texts that proved that Christianity was a means for Europeans to take over foreign countries. He also praised the anti-Christian policy in Japan.[232] Churches were destroyed and many Christians were imprisoned. The persecution got intense during the reign of his grandsonTự Đức, when most of the state efforts were to annihilate Vietnamese Christianity, although even during the height of the anti-Catholic campaign, many Catholic scholars were still permitted to hold high positions in the imperial court.

After an imperial edict in late 1862, Catholicism was officially recognized and worshipers of the faith obtained state protection. It is estimated that late-19th century Vietnam had about 600,000 to 700,000 Catholic Christians.

Demography

[edit]
Traditional Pharmacy in Tonkin, Vietnam

Before the French conquest, the Vietnamese population was very sparse due to the agricultural backbones economy of the country. The population in 1802 was 6.5 million people and had only grown to 8 million by 1840.[233] Rapid industrialization after the 1860s ushered in massive population growth and rapid urbanization in the late 19th century. Many peasants left tenant farms and poured into cities, they were hired by French-owned factories. By 1880 the Vietnamese were estimated back then as high as 18 million people,[234] while modern estimates by Angus Maddison have suggested a lower figure of 12.2 million people.[235] Vietnam under the Nguyễn dynasty was always a multiethnic complex. Nearly 80% percent of the Empire's population wereethnic Vietnamese (called Annamites then),[236] whom language belonged to the Mon-Khmer (Mon–Annamite then) family,[237] and the rest wereCham,Chinese,Khmer,Mường,Tày (called Thô then), and other 50 ethnic minorities such as theMang, Jarai, Yao.[238]

Children playing a traditional game inQuỳ Châu,Nghệ An province, 1920

The Annamites are distributed across the lowland of the country from Tonkin to Cochichina. The Chams live in central Vietnam and the Mekong Delta. The Chinese particularly concentrated in urbanised areas such as Saigon,Chợ Lớn, and Hanoi.[239] The Chinese tended to be divided into two groups calledMinh Hương (明鄉) andThanh nhân (清人).[240] The Minh Hương were Chinese refugees that had migrated and settled down in Vietnam earlier during the 17th century, who married with Vietnamese women, had been substantially assimilated to local Vietnamese and Khmer populaces, and loyal to the Nguyen,[241] compared to the Thanh nhân that recently arrived in Southern Vietnam, dominated the rice trade. During the reign of Minh Mạng, a restriction against the Thanh nhân was issued in 1827, Thanh nhân could not access to the state bureaucracy and had to be integrated into Vietnamese population like the Minh Hương.[242]

TheMường people inhabited the hills west of the Red River Delta, and although subordinate to the central authority, they were permitted to bear arms, a privilege not accorded to any other subjects of the court of Huế. The Tày and the Mang live in the northern highlands of Tonkin, both submitted to Huế court along with taxes and tribute, but were allowed to have their hereditary chiefs.[243]

Photography

[edit]
Main article:Photography in Vietnam

The first photographs of Vietnam were taken byJules Itier inDanang, in 1845.[244] The first photos of the Vietnamese were taken by Fedor Jagor in November 1857 in Singapore.[245] Due to the forbidden contact to foreigners, photography returned to Vietnam again during the French conquest and had shots taken byPaul Berranger during the French invasion of Da Nang (September 1858).[246] Since the French seizure of Saigon in 1859, the city and southern Vietnam had been opening to foreigners, and photography entered Vietnam exclusively from France and Europe.[247]

  • Early photograph of Fortress of Danang in 1845
  • The Nobility leaving the Imperial Citiadel.
    The Nobility leaving the Imperial Citiadel.
  • A Vietnamese noble posed for the photograph.
    A Vietnamese noble posed for the photograph.
  • Group of musicians in Huế, 1919. They are sitting on a sập.
    Group of musicians in Huế, 1919. They are sitting on asập.
  • Group of female musicians from Cochinchina to perform in the colonial exposition in Marseille, 1922
    Group of female musicians from Cochinchina to perform in the colonial exposition in Marseille, 1922
  • Judge and offender in the local trial.
    Judge and offender in the local trial.

Military

[edit]
Main article:Military of the Nguyễn dynasty

Gallery

[edit]
  • Huế city drawing in 1875
  • 1884 drawing of a marriage ceremony in Tonkin
    1884 drawing of a marriage ceremony inTonkin
  • Elephant parade in Huế
    Elephant parade in Huế
  • Tết new year holiday in temple Vietnam
    Tết new year holiday in temple Vietnam
  • Model of a traditional ship in central Vietnam
    Model of a traditional ship in central Vietnam

Imperial family

[edit]
Main article:House of Nguyễn Phúc
Imperial family of the Nguyễn dynasty
CountryNam Hà / Đàng Trong
Nguyễn dynasty
French protectorates of Annam andTonkin
Empire of Vietnam
State of Vietnam
Founded1558
Final rulerBảo Đại
Titles
TraditionsBuddhism,Confucianism andCatholicism
Deposition1777 (Tây Sơn Rebellion)
1945 (Abdication of Bảo Đại)[c]
1955 State of Vietnam referendum
Cadet branchesTôn Thất

TheHouse of Nguyễn Phúc (Nguyen Gia Mieu) had historically been founded in the 14th century in Gia Miêu village, King Nguyen origins from the 15th century was from Nguyen Dinh Xi.Thanh Hóa Province, before they came to rule southern Vietnam from 1558 to 1777 and 1780 to 1802, then became the ruling dynasty of the entire Vietnam. Traditionally, the family traces themselves toNguyễn Bặc (924–79), a duke and general during theĐinh dynasty fromGia Viễn,Ninh Bình. Princes and male descendants of Gia Long are called Hoàng Thân, while malelineal descendants of previous Nguyen lords are namedTôn Thất. Grandsons of the emperor were Hoàng tôn. Daughters of the emperor were called Hoàng nữ, and always earned the title công chúa (princess).

Their succession practically is according to the law of primogeniture, but sometimes conflicted. The first succession conflict arose in 1816 when Gia Long was designing for an heir. His first princeNguyễn Phúc Cảnh died in 1802. As a result, two rival factions emerged, one supportNguyễn Phúc Mỹ Đường, the eldest son of Prince Cảnh, as the crown prince, while other support Prince Đảm (later Minh Mang).[248] The second conflict was the 1847 succession when two young princesNguyễn Phúc Hồng Bảo andHồng Nhậm were dragged by the ill-failing Emperor Thiệu Trị as a potential heir. At first, Thiệu Trị apparently chose Prince Hồng Bảo because he was older, but after hearing advice from two regentsTrương Đăng Quế andNguyễn Tri Phương, he revised the heir at last minute and choose Hồng Nhậm as the crown prince.[249]

Emperors

[edit]

The following list is the emperors'era names, which have meaning in Chinese and Vietnamese. For example, the first ruler's era name, Gia Long, is the combination of the old names forSaigon (Gia Định) andHanoi (Thăng Long) to show the new unity of the country; the fourth, Tự Đức, means "Inheritance of Virtues"; the ninth, Đồng Khánh, means "Collective Celebration".

Portrait/PhotoTemple namePosthumous namePersonal nameLineageReignRegnal nameTombEvents
Portrait of Gia LongThế TổKhai Thiên Hoằng Đạo Lập Kỷ Thùy Thống Thần Văn Thánh Vũ Tuấn Đức Long Công Chí Nhân Đại Hiếu Cao Hoàng ĐếNguyễn Phúc ÁnhNguyễn lords1802–20 (1)Gia LongThiên Thọ lăngDefeated theTây Sơn and unified Vietnam.
Portrait of Minh MangThánh TổThể Thiên Xương Vận Chí Hiếu Thuần Đức Văn Vũ Minh Đoán Sáng Thuật Đại Thành Hậu Trạch Phong Công Nhân Hoàng ĐếNguyễn Phúc ĐảmSon1820–41 (2)Minh Mệnh (Minh Mạng)Hiếu LăngAnnexed Cambodia after theSiamese–Vietnamese War (1831–1834). AnnexedMuang Phuan after theLao rebellion. Suppressed theLê Văn Khôi revolt. Annexed the remainingPanduranga kingdom after theJa Thak Wa uprising, renamed the country Đại Nam (Great South), suppressed Christianity.
Hiến TổThiệu Thiên Long Vận Chí Thiện Thuần Hiếu Khoan Minh Duệ Đoán Văn Trị Vũ Công Thánh Triết Chượng Chương Hoàng ĐếNguyễn Phúc Miên TôngSon1841–47 (3)Thiệu TrịXương LăngCarried out policies of isolationism. Pulling troops from Cambodia.
Portrait of Tự ĐứcDực TôngThể Thiên Hanh Vận Chí Thành Đạt Hiếu Thể Kiện Đôn Nhân Khiêm Cung Minh Lược Duệ Văn Anh Hoàng ĐếNguyễn Phúc Hồng NhậmSon1847–83 (4)Tự ĐứcKhiêm LăngSuppressed Đoàn Hữu Trưng's rebellion. Facing French invasions. Ceded Cochinchina to France after theCochinchina campaign. Fought against French invasions of 1873 and 1882–1883.
Dục Đức's tombCung TôngHuệ Hoàng ĐếNguyễn Phúc Ưng ChânNephew (adopted son of Tự Đức)1883 (5)Dục ĐứcAn LăngThree-day emperor (20–23 July 1883), deposed and poisoned byTôn Thất Thuyết.
Portrait of Hiệp HòaVăn Lãng Quận VươngNguyễn Phúc Hồng DậtUncle (son of Thiệu Trị)1883 (6)Hiệp HòaFour-month emperor (30 July – 29 November 1883), poisoned by the order ofTôn Thất Thuyết.
Portrait of Kiến PhúcGiản TôngThiệu Đức Chí Hiếu Uyên Duệ Nghị Hoàng ĐếNguyễn Phúc Ưng ĐăngNephew (son of Hiệp Hòa's brother)1883–84 (7)Kiến PhúcBồi Lăng (withinKhiêm Lăng)Eight-month emperor (2 December 1883 – 31 July 1884). Signing of theTreaty of Huế (1884).
Portrait of Hàm NghiNguyễn Phúc Ưng LịchYounger brother1884–85 (8)Hàm NghiThonac Cemetery, FranceResisting against French rule under theCần Vương movement. Dethroned after one year, continuing his rebellion until captured in 1888 and exiled toFrench Algeria until his death in 1943.
Portrait of Đồng KhánhCảnh TôngHoằng Liệt Thống Thiết Mẫn Huệ Thuần Hoàng ĐếNguyễn Phúc Ưng KỷOlder brother1885–89 (9)Đồng KhánhTư LăngSuppress Hàm Nghi'sCần Vương movement.
Portrait of Thành TháiHoài Trạch CôngNguyễn Phúc Bửu LânCousin (son of Dục Đức)1889–1907 (10)Thành TháiAn LăngExiled toRéunion Island due to anti-French activities.
Portrait of Duy TânNguyễn Phúc Vĩnh Sanson1907–16 (11)Duy TânAn LăngRebelled against the French and exiled toRéunion Island in 1916.
Portrait of Khải ĐịnhHoằng TôngTự Đại Gia Vận Thánh Minh Thần Trí Nhân Hiếu Thành Kính Di Mô Thừa Liệt Tuyên Hoàng ĐếNguyễn Phúc Bửu ĐảoCousin (son ofĐồng Khánh)1916–25 (12)Khải ĐịnhỨng LăngCollaborated with the French, and was a political figurehead for French colonial rulers. Unpopular to the Vietnamese people.
Portrait of Bảo ĐạiNguyễn Phúc Vĩnh ThụySon1926–45 (13)Bảo ĐạiCimetière de Passy, FranceHead of theEmpire of Vietnam under Japanese occupation during World War II;abdicated and transferred power to theViet Minh in 1945, ending the Vietnamese monarchy. Installed as head of state of theState of Vietnam, ousted byNgo Dinh Diem after the1955 referendum.

After the death of Emperor Tự Đức (and according to his will), Dục Đức ascended to the throne on 19 July 1883. He was dethroned and imprisoned three days later, after being accused of deleting a paragraph from Tự Đức's will. With no time to announce his dynastic title, his era name was named for his residential palace.

Lineage

[edit]
1
Gia Long
1802–1819
 
 
2
Minh Mệnh
1820–1840
 
 
3
Thiệu Trị
1841–1847
 
 
     
4
Tự Đức
1847–1883
 Thoại Thái Vương Kiên Thái Vương 6
Hiệp Hoà
1883
  
       
5
Dục Đức
1883
 9
Đồng Khánh
1885–1889
 8
Hàm Nghi
1884–1885
 7
Kiến Phúc
1883–1884
  
10
Thành Thái
1889–1907
 12
Khải Định
1916–1925
 
  
11
Duy Tân
1907–1916
 13
Bảo Đại
1926–1945
 

Note:

  • Years are reigning years.

Family tree

[edit]

Simplified family tree of the Nguyen Phuc dynasty:

  • – Lords of Cochinchina (1550s–1777)
  • – Emperors of the independent Vietnamese monarchy (1802–1883)
  • – Emperors ofFrench Annam and Tonkin/Emperor ofEmpire of Vietnam (1885–1945)
Nguyễn Phúc family tree
Nguyễn Công Duẩn [vi]
Nguyễn Văn Lỗ [vi]
Nguyễn Văn Lang [vi]
Nguyễn Hoằng Dụ [vi][250]
Nguyễn Kim
Nguyễn HoàngNguyễn UôngNguyễn Thị Ngọc Bảo
Nguyễn Phúc Nguyên
Nguyễn Phúc Lan
Nguyễn Phúc Tần
Nguyễn Phúc Thái
Nguyễn Phúc Chu
Nguyễn Phúc Trú
Nguyễn Phúc Khoát
Nguyễn Phúc LuânNguyễn Phúc HiệuNguyễn Phúc Thuần
Gia Long (1)
r. 1802–20
Nguyễn Phúc Dương
Nguyễn Phúc CảnhMinh Mạng (2)
r. 1820–41
Nguyễn Phúc Mỹ ĐườngNguyễn Phúc Miên ThẩmNguyễn Phúc Miên ĐịnhThiệu Trị (3)
r. 1841–47
Nguyễn Phúc Miên Bửu
Nguyễn Phúc Tăng DuNguyễn Phúc Hồng BảoNguyễn Phúc Hồng YTự Đức (4)
r. 1848–83
Hiệp Hòa (6)
r. August–December 1883
Nguyễn Phúc Hồng Cai
Cường ĐểDục Đức (5)
r. 20–23 July 1883
Đồng Khánh (9)
r. 1885–89
Kiến Phúc (7)
r. December 1883 – July 1884
Hàm Nghi (8)
r. July 1884–85
Thành Thái(10)
r. 1889–1907
Khải Định (12)
r. 1916–25
Duy Tân (11)
r. 1907–16
Bảo Đại (13)
r. 1925–45
Bảo Ngọc (Georges Vĩnh San)(b. 1933)Bảo Long(1934–2007)Bảo Thăng(1944–2017)

Succession line

[edit]

Symbols

[edit]

Flags

[edit]
See also:List of flags of Vietnam,List of flags of French Indochina, andFlags of the Nguyễn dynasty's administrative units

The Nguyễn dynasty's national flag or the Imperial flag first appeared during the reign of EmperorGia Long. It was a yellow flag with a single or three horizontal red stripes, sometimes in 1822, it was entirely blank yellow or white.[251] The emperor's personal flag was a golden dragon spitting fire, surrounded by clouds, a silver moon, and a black crescent on a yellow background.[251]

Seals

[edit]
Main article:Seals of the Nguyễn dynasty

The Nguyễn dynasty's seal are rich and diverse in types and had strict rules and laws that regulated their manipulation, management, and use.[252] The common practice of using seals was clearly recorded in the book "Khâm định Đại Nam hội điển sự lệ" on how to use seals, how to place them, and on what kinds of documents, which was compiled by the Cabinet of the Nguyễn dynasty in the year Minh Mạng 3 (1822).[252] The various types of seals of the Nguyễn dynasty had different names based on their function, namely Bảo (寶), Tỷ (璽), Ấn (印), Chương (章), Ấn chương (印章), Kim bảo tỷ (金寶璽), Quan phòng (關防), Đồ ký (圖記), Kiềm ký (鈐記), Tín ký (信記), Ấn Ký (印記), Trưởng ký (長記), and Ký (記).[253][252]

Seals in the Nguyễn dynasty were overseen by a pair of agencies referred to as the Office of Ministry Seals Management – Officers on Duty (印司 – 直處,Ấn ty – Trực xứ), this is a term that refers to two agencies which were established within each of theSix Ministries, these agencies were tasked with keeping track of the seals, files, and chapters of their ministry.[254] On duty of the Office of Ministry Seals Management were the correspondents of each individual ministry that received and distributed documents and records of a government agency.[254] These two agencies usually had a few dozen officers who would import documents from their ministry.[254] Usually the name of the ministry is directly attached to the seal agency's name, for example "Office of Civil Affairs Ministry Seals Management – Civil Affairs Ministry Officers on Duty" (吏印司吏直處,Lại Ấn ty Lại Trực xứ).[254]

Since the Nguyễn dynasty period seals have a fairly uniform shape (with or without a handle), the uniform description of these seals in Vietnamese are:[255]

  • Thân ấn – The geometric block, or body, of the seal.[255]
  • Núm ấn – The handle for pressing the seal down on texts. In case the seal is shaped like a pyramid, there is no knob.[255]
  • Mặt ấn – Where the main content of the seal (symbol or word) is engraved, this area is usually in the face down position. The stamp surface is often used up to engrave letters or drawings.[255]
  • Lưng ấn – The face of the seal, where other information about the seal is engraved, usually in the supine position. In the case of the flat-head pyramid seal (ấn triện hình tháp đầu bằng), the flat head is the back.[255]
  • Hình ấn – A word used to indicate the impression of the seal on a text.[255]

Seals were also given to people after they received anoble title.[256] For example, after Léon Louis Sogny received the title of "Baron of An Bình" (安平男) in the year Bảo Đại 14 (保大拾肆年, 1939) he was also given a golden seal and aKim Bài (金牌) with his noble title on it. The seal had the seal script inscriptionAn Bình Nam chi ấn (安平男之印).[257]

In its 143 years of existence, the government of the Nguyễn dynasty had created more than 100 imperial seals.[258] These imperial seals were made ofjade,bronze, silver, gold,ivory, andmeteorite.

Sun, moon, auspicious clouds, and the Yin-Yang symbol

[edit]
A silverTự Đức Thông Bảo (嗣德通寶) coin depicting an imperial sun symbol.

LikeImperial China andRoyal Korea, the Vietnamese used thesun as the "Symbol of the Empire" and auspicious clouds and theTaijitu as "Symbols of the State".[259] Theheraldic systems of both the Later Lê and Nguyễn dynasties were similar to those found in China during the Ming and Qing dynasties.[259] The sun symbol as a flaming disc in Vietnam dates back to the 11th century and during the Nguyễn dynasty period this symbol was often depicted with pointed rays.[259] The moon symbolised the state, the sun the empire, stars the sovereigns, and clouds the heaven.[259]

The "Achievement of the Empire" and the "Achievement of the State" were identical to their Imperial Chinese counterparts, the "Achievement of the Empire" first appeared in Vietnam during the 11th century and were identical during the Later Lê and Nguyễn periods consisting of two Dragons surrounding a flaming sun, while the "Achievement of the State" is known to have been used as early as theTrần dynasty period and this early Trần version consists of two Dragons surrounding alotus flower (a symbol ofBuddhism).[259] During the Nguyễn dynasty period the "Achievement of the State" typically consisted of two dragons surrounding a moon or two dragons surrounding a Taijitu, this symbol was commonly found on the caps of high-ranking mandarins.[259] The two dragons surrounding the moon implies that the emperor, or "sovereign", (represented by the dragons) was also the head of state (represented by either the moon or a Yin-Yang symbol).[259] During the period of French domination (法屬,Pháp thuộc) these symbols could be interpreted as theFrench National Assembly (that is: theFrench people) was the sovereign over the Empire (the dragons), the Nguyễn Emperor now merely being the head of state (moon or Yin-Yang symbol).[259] Moons also appeared on the shields of common Nguyễn dynasty soldiers representing the state, while soldiers of the imperial guards sometimes had shields depicting a red sun showcasing that they were a function of the empire.[259]

Dragons

[edit]
Main article:Vietnamese dragon

Dragon motifs appeared on many state symbols during the Nguyễn dynasty period including on imperial edicts, coins, buildings, and the badges of the Imperial Guard.[259] During the Minh Mạng period (1820–1841) dragons on silverTiền coins were often depicted facing dexter (to the right), while during the Thiệu Trị period (1841–1847) and later these coins depicted dragons guardant (facing forward).[259] Dragons were considered to be one of the four sacred animals together with thePhượng hoàng (Phoenix),Kỳ lân (Unicorn), and theLinh quy (Sacred turtle).[260] During the Nguyễn dynasty period the depiction of dragons in Vietnamese art reached their zenith and the quality and variety of Nguyễn dynasty dragons was much higher than those of earlier dynasties.[260]

In the third month of the yearBính Tý, or Gia Long 15 (1816), Emperor Gia Long instructed the court to create special clothes, hats, and seals for himself and the crown prince to denote independence from China.[261] These regalia all depictedfive-clawed dragons (蠪𠄼𤔻,rồng 5 móng), in Chinese symbolism (including Vietnamese symbolism) five-clawed dragons are symbols of an Emperor, while four-clawed dragons are seen as symbols or kings.[261] To denote the high status of Emperor all monarchial robes, hats, and seals were adorned with five-clawed dragons and ordered the creation of new seals with five-clawed dragons as their seal knobs to showcase imperial legitimacy.[261] Meanwhile, the wardrobes and other symbols of vassals and princes were adorned with four-clawed dragons symbolising their status as "kings".[262][261]

The twonational coats of arms of the French protectorate of Annam would also consist of golden dragons with one being a sword per fess charged with a scroll inscribed with two Traditional Chinese charactersĐại Nam (大南) and supported by a single Vietnamese dragon and the other being a goldenfive-clawed dragon positionedaffronté.[263][259]

Gallery of symbols

[edit]
  • Flag of Nguyễn period Vietnam.[251]
    Flag of Nguyễn period Vietnam.[251]
  • An Imperial seal made during the Minh Mạng period.
    An Imperial seal made during theMinh Mạng period.
  • Dragon motifs are found everywhere in imperial buildings.
    Dragon motifs are found everywhere in imperial buildings.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^The predecessors of this dynasty were theNguyễn lords (1558-1777, 1780-1802). After it collapsed with the abdication ofBảo Đại, he continued to hold the title of "Emperor" of theState of Vietnam from 1949 to 1955.[1]
  2. ^At first,Gia Long requested the name "Nam Việt", but theJiaqing Emperor refused.[11][19]
  3. ^Bảo Đại was fully removed from Vietnamese politics following areferendum in 1955.

References

[edit]
  1. ^abc"The Pentagon Papers, Chapter 2, "U.S. Involvement in the Franco-Viet Minh War, 1950-1954", U.S. POLICY AND THE BAO DAI REGIME". Archived fromthe original on 6 August 2011. Retrieved23 July 2011.
  2. ^Woodside 1988, p. preface.
  3. ^Goscha 2016, p. preface.
  4. ^abKang, David C. (2012).East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute.Columbia University Press. pp. 101–102.In 1802 the Nguyen dynasty was recognized with an imperial pardon and tributary status. [...] there was no doubt in anyone's mind that China was the superior and the tributary state the inferior. The Vietnamese kings clearly realized that they had to acknowledge China's suzerainty and become tributaries [...]
  5. ^Eastman, Lloyd E. (1967).Throne and Mandarins: China's Search for a Policy during the Sino-French Controversy.Harvard University Press. pp. 34–40, 201.
  6. ^Eastman, Lloyd E. (1967).Throne and Mandarins: China's Search for a Policy during the Sino-French Controversy.Harvard University Press. pp. 123–124.
  7. ^Brocheux, Pierre; Hémery, Daniel (2011).Indochina: An Ambiguous Colonization, 1858–1954.University of California Press. pp. 78–81.
  8. ^abcLebra, Joyce C. (1975).Japan's Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere in World War II: Selected Readings and Documents. New York:Oxford University Press. pp. 157–158, 160.
  9. ^abLi, Tana; Reid, Anthony (1993).Southern Vietnam under the Nguyễn. Economic History of Southeast Asia Project. Australian National University.ISBN 981-3016-69-8.
  10. ^Lockhart, Bruce (2001)."Re-assessing the Nguyễn Dynasty".Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies.15 (1):9–53.JSTOR 40860771.
  11. ^abWoods 2002, p. 38.
  12. ^abcNorman & Mei 1976.
  13. ^abcdMeacham 1996.
  14. ^Yue Hashimoto 1972, p. 1.
  15. ^Knoblock & Riegel 2001, p. 510.
  16. ^Lieberman (2003), p. 405.
  17. ^Phan 1985, p. 510.
  18. ^Ooi 2004, p. 932.
  19. ^Shaofei & Guoqing 2016.
  20. ^"韩周敬: 越南阮朝嘉、明时期国号问题析论".越南历史研究.Archived from the original on 31 August 2018. Retrieved31 August 2018.
  21. ^Toda (1882), p. 46.
  22. ^Nguyễn Thu Hoài (21 January 2019)."Người lao động Việt Nam được nghỉ ngày 1.5 từ bao giờ?" (in Vietnamese). Trung tâm Lưu trữ quốc gia I (National Archives Nr. 1, Hanoi) – Cục Văn thư và Lưu trữ nhà nước (State Records And Archives Management Department Of Việt Nam).Archived from the original on 16 July 2022. Retrieved2 February 2022.
  23. ^Verlag (1827), p. 298.
  24. ^Toda (1882), p. 41.
  25. ^Hiley (1848), p. 350.
  26. ^Lieberman (2003), p. 187.
  27. ^Holcombe (2017), pp. 10–11.
  28. ^"Ai là tể tướng đầu tiên trong lịch sử Việt Nam? (Who is the first prime minister in Vietnamese history?)". Vietnam Union of Science and Technology Associations. 5 February 2014.Archived from the original on 11 November 2017. Retrieved5 February 2019.
  29. ^"The development of Le government in fifteenth century Vietnam".Archived from the original on 2 October 2020. Retrieved2 February 2019.
  30. ^Bui Ngoc Son (2014)."Confucian Constitutionalism in Imperial Vietnam". National Taiwan University. Retrieved16 September 2025.
  31. ^K. W. Taylor (2013).A History of the Vietnamese. Cambridge University Press. pp. 232–.ISBN 978-0-521-87586-8.
  32. ^"A Glimpse of Vietnam's History".geocities. Archived fromthe original on 21 October 2009. Retrieved2 February 2019.[unreliable source?]
  33. ^Danny Wong Tze Ken (2004)."Vietnam–Champa Relations and the Malay–Islam Regional Network in the 17th–19th Centuries – The Vietnamese Victory over Champa in 1693".Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia.
  34. ^George Coedes (2015).The Making of South East Asia (RLE Modern East and South East Asia). Taylor & Francis. pp. 175–.ISBN 978-1-317-45094-8.
  35. ^Michael Arthur Aung-Thwin; Kenneth R. Hall (2011).New Perspectives on the History and Historiography of Southeast Asia: Continuing Explorations. Routledge. pp. 158–.ISBN 978-1-136-81964-3.
  36. ^"A Brief History of the Tay Son Movement (1771–1802)". EnglishRainbow.Archived from the original on 2 October 2020. Retrieved2 February 2019.
  37. ^Tạ Chí Đại Trường 1973, p. 89
  38. ^Thụy Khuê 2017, pp. 140–142
  39. ^Tạ Chí Đại Trường 1973, p. 91
  40. ^Naval Intelligence Division (Anh Quốc) (2013).Indo-China. Routledge. p. 176.ISBN 978-1-136-20911-6.
  41. ^Phan Khoang 2001, p. 508
  42. ^abQuốc sử quán triều Nguyễn 2007, p. 188
  43. ^Tạ Chí Đại Trường 1973, pp. 110–111
  44. ^Phan Khoang 2001, pp. 522–523
  45. ^Phan Khoang 2001, p. 517
  46. ^Huỳnh Minh 2006, p. 143
  47. ^Quốc sử quán triều Nguyễn 2007, p. 195
  48. ^Tạ Chí Đại Trường 1973, p. 124
  49. ^Nguyễn Khắc Thuần (2005), Danh tướng Việt Nam, tập 3, Việt Nam: Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục, tr. 195
  50. ^Tạ Chí Đại Trường 1973, p. 178
  51. ^Trần Trọng Kim 1971, p. 111 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFTrần_Trọng_Kim1971 (help)
  52. ^Tạ Chí Đại Trường 1973, pp. 182–183
  53. ^Tạ Chí Đại Trường 1973, p. 183
  54. ^Nguyễn Quang Trung Tiến 1999
  55. ^Đặng Việt Thủy & Đặng Thành Trung 2008, p. 279
  56. ^Phan Khoang 2001, p. 519
  57. ^Sơn Nam 2009, pp. 54–55
  58. ^Quốc sử quán triều Nguyễn 2007, p. 203
  59. ^Trần Trọng Kim 1971, p. 155 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFTrần_Trọng_Kim1971 (help)
  60. ^Quốc sử quán triều Nguyễn 2007, pp. 207–211
  61. ^Lieberman (2003), pp. 30–31.
  62. ^abGoscha (2016), p. 70.
  63. ^abGoscha (2016), p. 71.
  64. ^abLieberman (2003), p. 427.
  65. ^Kamm 1996, p. 83
  66. ^Tarling 1999, pp. 245–246
  67. ^"Brief history of the Nguyen dynasty". Hue Monuments Conservation Centre. Archived fromthe original on 7 February 2019. Retrieved5 February 2019.
  68. ^Taylor (2013), p. 398.
  69. ^Momoki (2015), p. 157, "...When my father Thế tổ Cao hoàng đế [Gia Long] possessed An Nam, our kingdom was named the country of Great Việt Nam [Đại Việt Nam quốc]...".
  70. ^Whitmore & Zottoli (2016), pp. 200, 226.
  71. ^Taylor (2013), p. 400.
  72. ^abKiernan (2019), p. 273.
  73. ^Mikaberidze (2020), p. 487.
  74. ^Mikaberidze (2020), p. 488.
  75. ^Goscha (2016), p. 49.
  76. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 274.
  77. ^Woodside (1988), pp. 46, 48.
  78. ^Taylor (2013), p. 401.
  79. ^Woodside (1988), p. 248.
  80. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 276.
  81. ^abKiernan (2019), p. 277.
  82. ^McLeod (1991), p. 24.
  83. ^Woodside (1988), p. 37.
  84. ^Taylor (2013), p. 418.
  85. ^Goscha (2016), p. 45.
  86. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 4.
  87. ^abKiernan (2019), p. 279.
  88. ^Choi (2004a), p. 141.
  89. ^Jean-François Hubert (2012).The Art of Champa. Parkstone International. pp. 25–.ISBN 978-1-78042-964-9.
  90. ^"The Raja Praong Ritual: A Memory of the Sea in Cham–Malay Relations".Cham Studies. 20 October 2015.
  91. ^(Extracted from Truong Van Mon, "The Raja Praong Ritual: a Memory of the Sea in Cham–Malay Relations", in Memory And Knowledge Of The Sea In South Asia, Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, Monograph Series 3, pp. 97–111. International Seminar on Maritime Culture and Geopolitics & Workshop on Bajau Laut Music and Dance, Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences and the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya, 23–24/2008)
  92. ^Dharma, Po."The Uprisings of Katip Sumat and Ja Thak Wa (1833–1835)".Cham Today. Archived fromthe original on 26 June 2015. Retrieved25 June 2015.
  93. ^Goscha (2016), p. 419.
  94. ^Goscha (2016), p. 420.
  95. ^McLeod (1991), p. 30.
  96. ^Li (2004a), p. 12.
  97. ^Goscha (2016), p. 57.
  98. ^McLeod (1991), p. 31.
  99. ^Goscha (2016), p. 56.
  100. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 283.
  101. ^abWoodside (1988), p. 249.
  102. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 285.
  103. ^Chandler (2018), pp. 152–153.
  104. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 286.
  105. ^Kiernan (2019), pp. 283–288.
  106. ^Chandler (2018), pp. 159–163.
  107. ^Heath (2003), p. 175.
  108. ^Heath (2003), p. 163.
  109. ^Miller (1990), pp. 42–44.
  110. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 47.
  111. ^Taylor (2013), p. 433.
  112. ^McLeod (1991), p. 35.
  113. ^Taylor (2013), p. 434.
  114. ^Goscha (2016), p. 59.
  115. ^abcKiernan (2019), p. 290.
  116. ^Taylor (2013), p. 435.
  117. ^McLeod (1991), p. 39.
  118. ^Taylor (2013), pp. 436–437.
  119. ^McLeod (1991), pp. 38–39.
  120. ^Goscha (2016), p. 60.
  121. ^Keith (2012), p. 47.
  122. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 305.
  123. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 87.
  124. ^Amirell (2019), p. 169.
  125. ^Keith (2012), p. 49.
  126. ^Bradley (2016), p. 50.
  127. ^Chapuis (2000), pp. 48–49.
  128. ^Goscha (2016), p. 65.
  129. ^Chapuis (2000), pp. 50–51.
  130. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 53.
  131. ^Amirell (2019), p. 174.
  132. ^Bradley (2016), pp. 63–64.
  133. ^Goscha (2016), p. 66.
  134. ^Amirell (2019), p. 179.
  135. ^Amirell (2019), p. 180.
  136. ^Chapuis (2000), pp. 55–61.
  137. ^Goscha (2016), p. 67.
  138. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 61.
  139. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 63.
  140. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 65.
  141. ^Bradley (2016), p. 90.
  142. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 66.
  143. ^Bradley (2016), p. 102.
  144. ^Amirell (2019), p. 191.
  145. ^Amirell (2019), p. 194.
  146. ^Bradley (2016), p. 106.
  147. ^Taylor (2013), p. 474.
  148. ^Goscha (2016), pp. 69–70.
  149. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 319.
  150. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 67.
  151. ^Bradley (2016), p. 107.
  152. ^Taylor (2013), p. 475.
  153. ^Chapuis (2000), p. 71.
  154. ^Goscha (2016), p. 91.
  155. ^Goscha (2016), p. 90.
  156. ^Goscha (2016), p. 93.
  157. ^abc"The conquest of Vietnam by France".Encyclopædia Britannica.Archived from the original on 17 April 2019. Retrieved31 January 2019.
  158. ^Eastman, Lloyd E. (1967).Throne and Mandarins: China's Search for a Policy during the Sino-French Controversy.Harvard University Press. pp. 200–201.
  159. ^Zeller, João van."Vietname em 2015: os portugueses reemergem, 500 anos depois".Observador (in European Portuguese).Archived from the original on 31 October 2023. Retrieved31 October 2023.
  160. ^"O jesuíta beirão a quem o Vietname deve o alfabeto".www.dn.pt (in European Portuguese). 4 May 2020.Archived from the original on 31 October 2023. Retrieved31 October 2023.
  161. ^Karnow, Stanley (1997).Vietnam: A History.Penguin Books. p. 162.
  162. ^Vietnam Law & Legal Forum Vol. 3, Issues 25–36. p. 233. 1996 "In 1834 the 'Vien Co Mat' (secret affairs institute) was set up for the first time in the feudal history of Vietnam, comprising four high-ranking mandarins. This was the key agency in the royal court, just besides the king, which was entitled to ..."
  163. ^The Vietnamese Response to French Intervention, 1862–1874, p. 55 Mark W. McLeod – 1991 "... Minister of Public Office (Thuong thu Bo Lai) as well as his membership in the emperor's Privy Council (Co mat vien)"
  164. ^The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and ..., p. 757 Spencer C. Tucker – 2011 "At the capital of Hue, Minh Mang established the Noi Cac Vien (Grand Secretariat) and the Co Mat Vien (Privy Council). The rest of the bureaucracy was also re-organized with the creation of a nine-rank Mandarin corps. It was also under Minh
  165. ^Keane (1896), p. 295.
  166. ^abWoodside (1988), p. 9.
  167. ^Woodside (1988), p. 14.
  168. ^Woodside (1988), p. 18.
  169. ^Woodside (1988), p. 19.
  170. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 303.
  171. ^Alexander Barton Woodside:Vietnam and the Chinese Model: A Comparative Study of Vietnamese and Chinese Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century,Harvard University Asia Center,Harvard University Press,Cambridge, MA 1988, S. 10
  172. ^abWoodside (1988), p. 10.
  173. ^Woodside (1988), p. 11.
  174. ^abcdefgTrần Gia Phụng.Trung Kỳ Dân biến 1908. Toronto, Canada, 2008. pp. 35–40.
  175. ^Trần (2018), pp. 437–438.
  176. ^Trần (2018), p. 438.
  177. ^Trần (2018), p. 439.
  178. ^Woodside (1988), p. 141.
  179. ^Woodside (1988), p. 142.
  180. ^abWoodside (1988), p. 143.
  181. ^Woodside (1988), p. 145.
  182. ^Woodside (1988), p. 147.
  183. ^Woodside (1988), p. 146.
  184. ^Woodside (1988), p. 244.
  185. ^Woodside (1988), p. 148.
  186. ^Woodside (1988), pp. 238–239.
  187. ^Chanda, Nayan (1986).Brother Enemy: The War After the War (illustrated ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. pp. 53, 111.ISBN 9780151144204.
  188. ^"有个国家居然视自己是中国, 清政府做了一件事, 刺激到崩溃_历史_万花镜". 29 August 2016. Archived fromthe original on 29 August 2016. Retrieved25 April 2021.
  189. ^Chandler (2018), p. 153.
  190. ^Choi, Byung Wook (2018).Southern Vietnam under the Reign of Minh Mang (1820–1841): Central Policies and Local Response. Book collections on Project MUSE (illustrated ed.). Cornell University Press. p. 39.ISBN 978-1501719523.
  191. ^Norman G. Owen (2005).The Emergence of Modern Southeast Asia: A New History. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 115–.ISBN 978-0-8248-2890-5.Archived from the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved18 November 2020.
  192. ^Zottoli, Brian A. (2011).Reconceptualizing Southern Vietnamese Hi story from the 15th to 18th Centuries: Competition along the Coasts from Guangdong to Cambod (A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan). p. 14. Archived fromthe original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved29 January 2017.
  193. ^A. Dirk Moses (2008).Empire, Colony, Genocide: Conquest, Occupation, and Subaltern Resistance in World History. Berghahn Books. pp. 209–.ISBN 978-1-84545-452-4.Archived from the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved18 November 2020.
  194. ^Randall Peerenboom; Carole J. Petersen; Albert H.Y. Chen (2006).Human Rights in Asia: A Comparative Legal Study of Twelve Asian Jurisdictions, France and the USA. Routledge. pp. 474–.ISBN 978-1-134-23881-1.
  195. ^Danny Wong Tze Ken (17 June 2004)."Vietnam–Champa Relations and the Malay–Islam Regional Network in the 17th–19th Centuries".Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia.
  196. ^Choi Byung Wook (2004).Southern Vietnam Under the Reign of Minh Mạng (1820–1841): Central Policies and Local Response. SEAP Publications. pp. 34–.ISBN 978-0-87727-138-3.Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved22 June 2016.
  197. ^Choi Byung Wook (2004).Southern Vietnam Under the Reign of Minh Mạng (1820–1841): Central Policies and Local Response. SEAP Publications. pp. 136–.ISBN 978-0-87727-138-3.
  198. ^Choi Byung Wook (2004).Southern Vietnam Under the Reign of Minh Mạng (1820–1841): Central Policies and Local Response. SEAP Publications. pp. 137–.ISBN 978-0-87727-138-3.
  199. ^Nguyễn Đức Hiệp.Về lịch sử người Minh Hương và người Hoa ở Nam bộArchived 8 December 2015 at theWayback Machine. Văn hóa học, 21 February 2008. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
  200. ^蔣為文 (2013)."越南的明鄉人與華人移民的族群認同與本土化差異"(PDF).台灣國際研究季刊 (in Chinese (Taiwan)).9 (4). 國立成功大學越南研究中心: 8. Retrieved23 June 2014.[permanent dead link]
  201. ^Leo Suryadinata (1997).Ethnic Chinese as Southeast Asians. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.ISBN 9813055502. Retrieved7 July 2014.
  202. ^"明鄉人".Chinese Encyclopedia (in Chinese (Taiwan)).Chinese Culture University. 1983. Archived fromthe original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved24 June 2014.
  203. ^Alexander Woodside (1971).Vietnam and the Chinese Model: A Comparative Study of Vietnamese and Chinese Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. Harvard Univ Asia Center. pp. 134–.ISBN 978-0-674-93721-5.
  204. ^Nguyen, Thuc-Doan T. (2008).Globalization: A View by Vietnamese Consumers Through Wedding Windows. University of Utah. pp. 34–.ISBN 978-0-549-68091-8.[permanent dead link]
  205. ^"Angelasancartier.net".angelasancartier.net.Archived from the original on 21 January 2016. Retrieved19 November 2017.
  206. ^"#18 Transcultural Tradition of the Vietnamese Ao Dai".Beyondvictoriana.com. 14 March 2010.Archived from the original on 23 March 2010. Retrieved19 November 2017.
  207. ^"Ao Dai – LoveToKnow".Fashion-hjistory.lovetoknow.com.Archived from the original on 4 February 2016. Retrieved19 November 2017.
  208. ^"The Ao Dai and I: A Personal Essay on Cultural Identity and Steampunk".Tor.com. 20 October 2010.Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved19 November 2017.
  209. ^Vietnam. Michelin Travel Publications. 2002. p. 200.[permanent dead link]
  210. ^Gary Yia Lee; Nicholas Tapp (2010).Culture and Customs of the Hmong. ABC-CLIO. pp. 138–.ISBN 978-0-313-34527-2.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved21 August 2016.
  211. ^Anthony Reid (2015).A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 285–.ISBN 978-0-631-17961-0.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved21 August 2016.
  212. ^Anthony Reid (1990).Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450–1680: The Lands Below the Winds. Yale University Press. pp. 90–.ISBN 978-0-300-04750-9.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved21 August 2016.
  213. ^A. Terry Rambo (2005).Searching for Vietnam: Selected Writings on Vietnamese Culture and Society. Kyoto University Press. p. 64.ISBN 978-1-920901-05-9.
  214. ^Jayne Werner; John K. Whitmore; George Dutton (2012).Sources of Vietnamese Tradition. Columbia University Press. pp. 295–.ISBN 978-0-231-51110-0.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved21 August 2016.
  215. ^Alexander Woodside (1971).Vietnam and the Chinese Model: A Comparative Study of Vietnamese and Chinese Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. Harvard Univ Asia Center. pp. 117–.ISBN 978-0-674-93721-5.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved4 October 2016.
  216. ^"有个国家居然视自己是中国, 清政府做了一件事, 刺激到崩溃_历史_万花镜". Archived fromthe original on 29 August 2016. Retrieved9 August 2016.
  217. ^"张明扬 : 历史上异域的中国梦 _ 腾讯 · 大家". Archived fromthe original on 16 September 2016. Retrieved9 August 2016.
  218. ^"越南名儒李文馥-龙文,乡贤,名儒-龙文新闻网".Lwxww.cn. Archived fromthe original on 8 October 2016. Retrieved19 November 2017.
  219. ^John Gillespie; Albert H.Y. Chen (2010).Legal Reforms in China and Vietnam: A Comparison of Asian Communist Regimes. Taylor & Francis. pp. 6–.ISBN 978-0-203-85269-9.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved4 October 2016.John Gillespie; Albert H.Y. Chen (2010).Legal Reforms in China and Vietnam: A Comparison of Asian Communist Regimes. Routledge. pp. 6–.ISBN 978-1-136-97843-2.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved9 August 2016.John Gillespie; Albert H.Y. Chen (2010).Legal Reforms in China and Vietnam: A Comparison of Asian Communist Regimes. Routledge. pp. 6–.ISBN 978-1-136-97842-5.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved9 August 2016.
  220. ^Charles Holcombe (2001).The Genesis of East Asia: 221 B.C. – A.D. 907. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 41–.ISBN 978-0-8248-2465-5.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved4 October 2016.
  221. ^Pamela D. McElwee (2003).'Lost worlds' or 'lost causes'?: biodiversity conservation, forest management, and rural life in Vietnam. Yale University. p. 67.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved4 October 2016.Pamela D. McElwee (2003).'Lost worlds' or 'lost causes'?: biodiversity conservation, forest management, and rural life in Vietnam. Yale University. p. 67.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved4 October 2016.
  222. ^Journal of Vietnamese Studies. University of California Press. 2006. p. 317.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved4 October 2016.
  223. ^Kelley 2006, p. 325.
  224. ^Woodside; Kelley; Cooke (9 March 2016)."Q. How Confucian is/was Vietnam?".Cindyanguyen.wordpress.com. Retrieved19 November 2017.[permanent dead link]
  225. ^Dyt (2015), p. 15.
  226. ^Kelley (2006), p. 349.
  227. ^Kelley (2006), p. 343.
  228. ^Dyt (2015), p. 4.
  229. ^Dyt (2015), pp. 12–13.
  230. ^Dyt (2015), p. 14.
  231. ^Kiernan (2019), pp. 305–306.
  232. ^Taylor (2013), pp. 421–422.
  233. ^Popkin (1979), p. 136.
  234. ^Johnston (1881), p. 322.
  235. ^Avakov (2015), p. 28.
  236. ^Lieberman (2003), p. 433.
  237. ^Richardson (1880), p. 159.
  238. ^Keane (1896), p. 272.
  239. ^Staunton (1884), p. 37.
  240. ^Lieberman (2003), p. 430.
  241. ^Choi (2004b), p. 85.
  242. ^Woodside (1988), p. 272.
  243. ^Staunton (1884), p. 38.
  244. ^Bennett (2020), p. 15.
  245. ^Bennett (2020), p. 18.
  246. ^Bennett (2020), p. 20.
  247. ^Bennett (2020), p. 24.
  248. ^Smith (1974), p. 154.
  249. ^Smith (1974), p. 155.
  250. ^Kiernan (2019), p. 214.
  251. ^abcHeath (2003), p. 197.
  252. ^abcThs. Đoàn Thu Thủy – Nguyễn Thu Hường (10 January 2012)."Vai trò và vị trí đóng dấu của các loại ấn trên tài liệu Châu bản triều Nguyễn. 10/01/2012 – Lượt xem: 931 – Trải qua các triều đại, ấn chương Việt Nam ngày càng phong phú về loại hình và hình thể" (in Vietnamese). Cục Văn thư và Lưu trữ nhà nước (State Records And Archives Management Department Of VietNam).Archived from the original on 16 July 2022. Retrieved4 April 2021.
  253. ^english.cinet.vn (13 October 2011)."Seals of Nguyen Dynasty showcased. Around 140 seals of the Nguyen Dynasty are displayed at an exhibition which opened in Hanoi on October 12". VietNam Breaking News.Archived from the original on 16 July 2022. Retrieved25 March 2021.
  254. ^abcdTừ điển chức quan Việt Nam, Đỗ Văn Ninh, 2002, trang 327 mục 571. Hộ ấn ty, hộ trực xứ (inVietnamese).
  255. ^abcdefLan Phương (Tổng hợp) (14 October 2015)."Ấn triện đồng triều Nguyễn. – Ấn triện bằng đồng là loại liên quan đến uy quyền. Vua Nguyễn cấp ấn triện cho những bề tôi là để ban ủy quyền cho các bề tôi thay mặt vua cai trị dân. Nghiên cứu về ấn triện bằng đồng thời Nguyễn sẽ hiểu thêm về hệ thống quan chức triều Nguyễn cũng như nhiều vấn đề khác liên quan" (in Vietnamese).Bào Tàng Lich Sù Quóc Gia (Vietnam National Museum of History).Archived from the original on 17 July 2022. Retrieved5 April 2021.
  256. ^Christophe (17 September 2013)."AP0670-Sogny-Marien. Titre : Hué, 1939 – Léon Sogny est élevé à la dignité nobiliaire de baron d'An Binh (13)" (in French). L'Association des Amis du Vieux Huế. Archived fromthe original on 5 April 2022. Retrieved24 March 2021.
  257. ^Christophe (17 September 2013)."AP0678-Sogny-Marien. Titre : Hué, 1939 – Léon Sogny est élevé à la dignité nobiliaire de baron d'An Binh (12)" (in French). L'Association des Amis du Vieux Huế. Archived fromthe original on 26 March 2022. Retrieved24 March 2021.
  258. ^VietNamNet Bridge (10 February 2016)."No royal seal left in Hue today. VietNamNet Bridge – It is a great regret that none of more than 100 seals of the Nguyen emperors are in Hue City today". VietNam Breaking News.Archived from the original on 16 July 2022. Retrieved8 March 2021.
  259. ^abcdefghijklDe Rode Leeuw –Armorial of VietnamArchived 16 August 2021 at theWayback Machine by Hubert de Vries. Retrieved: 19 August 2021.
  260. ^abStory and photos: Dong Van (8 September 2018)."Admiring Dragons and Phoenixes on the Treasures of the Nguyen Dynasty. – This is also the name of the exhibition which is co-organized by the National Museum of History and Hue Monuments Conservation Center. The exhibition opening ceremony was on the morning of September 7 (7/9), at Hue Museum of Royal Antiquities". Thua Thien Hue Online Newspaper.Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved19 August 2021.
  261. ^abcdBee (baodatviet.vn) (3 June 2012)."Giải mã 'rồng 5 móng' của nhà Nguyễn. Để thể hiện tính độc lập giữa Hoàng đế Việt Nam và các nước láng giềng, Vua Gia Long đã có chỉ dụ về quy định các hình thêu, đúc rồng trên trang phục, đồ dùng của vua và hoàng thái tử chỉ được thêu rồng 5 móng, khác với rồng 4 móng của Trung Hoa" (in Vietnamese).BẢO TÀNG LỊCH SỬ QUỐC GIA (VIETNAM NATIONAL MUSEUM OF HISTORY).Archived from the original on 16 July 2022. Retrieved25 March 2021.
  262. ^Đại Nam thực lục chính biên, trang 921 tập 1 NXB Giáo dục 2002. (inVietnamese).
  263. ^Hymnes et pavillons d'Indochine (in French). 1941.Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved9 March 2021.{{cite book}}:|work= ignored (help)

Sources

[edit]

Books

[edit]
  • Amirell, Stefan E. (2019),Pirates of Empire Colonisation and Maritime Violence in Southeast Asia, Cambridge University Press,ISBN 978-1-108-63682-7
  • Avakov, Alexander V. (2015),Two Thousand Years of Economic Statistics, Years 1–2012 Population, GDP at PPP, and GDP Per Capita. Volume 1, By Rank, Algora Publishing,ISBN 978-1-62894-101-2
  • Balfour, Francis (1884).The Works of Francis Maitland Balfour: Volume 3.
  • Bennett, Terry (2020).Early Photography in Vietnam. Renaissance Books.ISBN 978-19129-6-104-7.
  • Bradley, Camp Davis (2016).Imperial Bandits: Outlaws and Rebels in the China-Vietnam Borderlands. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.ISBN 978-0-295-74205-2.
  • Đặng Việt Thủy; Đặng Thành Trung (2008).54 vị Hoàng đế Việt Nam (in Vietnamese).Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Quân đội Nhân dân.
  • Chandler, David (2018).A History of Cambodia (4 ed.). Routledge.ISBN 978-0429964060.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved24 May 2020.
  • Chapuis, Oscar (2000).The Last Emperors of Vietnam: from Tu Duc to Bao Dai. Greenwood Press.ISBN 0-313-31170-6.
  • Choi, Byung Wook (2004a),Southern Vietnam Under the Reign of Minh Mạng (1820–1841): Central Policies and Local Response, SEAP Publications,ISBN 978-1-501-71952-3
  • ——— (2004b), "The Nguyen dynasty's policy toward Chinese on the Water Frontier in the first half of the Nineteenth Century", in Nola, Cooke (ed.),The Water Frontier, Singapore University Press, pp. 85–99
  • Dror, Olga (2007),Cult, Culture, and Authority : Princess Lieu Hanh in Vietnamese History, University of Hawaii Press,ISBN 978-0-8248-2972-8
  • Dutton, George Edson (2006).The Tây Sơn uprising: society and rebellion in eighteenth-century Vietnam. University of Hawaii Press.ISBN 0-8248-2984-0.
  • Everett, Edward (1841).The North American Review:Volume 52.
  • Goscha, Christopher (2016).Vietnam: A New History. Basic Books.ISBN 978-0-46509-436-3.
  • Heath, Ian (2003) [1998].Armies of the Nineteenth Century: Burma and Indo-China. Foundry Books.ISBN 978-1-90154-306-3.
  • Hiley, Richard (1848) [1843].Progressive geography, adapted to junior classes. Oxford University.
  • Holcombe, Charles (2017).A History of East Asia: From the Origins of Civilization to the Twenty-First Century.Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-11071-1-873-7.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved25 May 2020.
  • Huỳnh Minh (2006).Gia Định xưa. Nhà Xuất bản Văn hóa-Thông tin.
  • Kamm, Henry (1996).Dragon Ascending: Vietnam and the Vietnamese. Arcade Publishing.ISBN 1559703067.
  • Keane, A. H. (1896).Stanford's Compendium of Geography and Travel: Asia – Vol II: Southern and Western Asia. E. Stanford.
  • Kiernan, Ben (2019) [2017].Việt Nam: a history from earliest time to the present.Oxford University Press.ISBN 978-0-19005-379-6.
  • Keith, Charlers (2012).Catholic Vietnam: A Church from Empire to Nation. University of California Press.ISBN 978-0-52027-247-7.
  • Kollman (pub.) (1846).Sion. Eine Stimme in der Kirche für unsere Zeit. Eine rel. Zeitschrift ... eine Hausbibliothek für Geistliche und fromme katholische Familien. Hrsg. durch einen Verein von Katholiken u. red. von Thomas Wiser u. W. Reithmeier: Volume 28.
  • Johnston, A. K. (1880).A School Physical and Descriptive Geography. Oxford University.
  • ——— (1881).A Physical, Historical, Political, & Descriptive Geography. E. Stanford.
  • Lieberman, Victor B. (2003).Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1830, volume 1, Integration on the Mainland. Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-80496-7.
  • Li, Tana (1994), "Rice Trade in the 18th and 19th Century Mekong Delta and Its Implication", in Aphornsuvan, Thanet (ed.),An International Seminar on Thailand and her neighbours: Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia, Thammasat University Press, pp. 198–213
  • ——— (2002),Việt Nam học kỷ yếu Hội thảo quốc tế lần thứ nhất, Thế giới Publishing, pp. 141–150
  • ——— (2004a), "The Water Frontier: In Introduction", in Nola, Cooke (ed.),The Water Frontier, Singapore University Press, pp. 1–20,ISBN 978-0-74253-082-9
  • ——— (2004b), "The late 18th and early 19th-century Mekong Delta in the Regional Trade System", in Nola, Cooke (ed.),The Water Frontier, Singapore University Press, pp. 71–84
  • ——— (2004c), "Ships and ship building in the Mekong delta, 1750–1840", in Nola, Cooke (ed.),The Water Frontier, Singapore University Press, pp. 119–135
  • ——— (2018) [1998].Nguyen Cochinchina: Southern Vietnam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.Cornell University Press.
  • Marr, David G. (1981).Vietnamese Tradition on Trial, 1920–1945: Volume 10. University of California Press.
  • McGregor, John (1834).The Resources and Statistics of Nations Exhibiting the Geographical Position and Natural Resources, the Area and Population, the Political Statistics ... of All Countries · Volume 2.
  • McHale, Frederick (2008).Print and Power: Confucianism, Communism, and Buddhism in the Making of Modern Vietnam. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.ISBN 978-0-82484-304-5.
  • McLeod, Mark W. (1991).The Vietnamese response to French intervention, 1862–1874. New York: Praeger.ISBN 0-275-93562-0.
  • Mikaberidze, Alexander (2020).The Napoleonic Wars: A Global History. Oxford University Press.ISBN 978-0-199-39406-7.
  • Miller, Robert (1990).United States and Vietnam 1787–1941. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.ISBN 978-0-788-10810-5.
  • Momoki, Shiro (2015), "The Vietnamese empire and its expansion, c. 980–1840", in Wade, Geoff (ed.),Asian Expansions: The Historical Experiences of Polity Expansion in Asia, Routledge, pp. 144–166,ISBN 978-0-41558-995-6
  • Phan Khoang (2001).Việt sử xứ Đàng Trong (in Vietnamese). Hanoi: Văn Học Publishing House.
  • Popkin, Samuel (1979),The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam, University of California Press,ISBN 978-0-520-03954-4
  • O'Brien, Patrick Karl (2007),Philip's Atlas of World History, Philip's,ISBN 978-0-54008-867-6
  • Peters, Erica J. (2012),Appetites and Aspirations in Vietnam: Food and Drink in the Long Nineteenth Century, AltaMira Press,ISBN 978-0-759-12075-4
  • Quốc sử quán triều Nguyễn (2007).Đại Nam thực lục chính biên. Vol. Tập một: Tiền biên và Chính biên-Kỷ thứ nhất (từ 1558 đến 1819) (bản dịch của Viện Sử học Việt Nam ed.). Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục.
  • Richardson, John (1880).A smaller manual of modern geography. Physical and political. John Murray.
  • Sơn Nam (2009).Lịch sử Khẩn Hoang Miền Nam (1st ed.). Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh: Nhà Xuất bản Trẻ.
  • Staunton, Sidney A. (1884).The War in Tong-king:Why the French are in Tong-king, and what They are Doing There. Cupples, Upham.
  • Tạ Chí Đại Trường (1973).Lịch sử Nội Chiến Việt Nam 1771–1802 (in Vietnamese). Sài Gòn: Nhà xuất bản Văn Sử Học.
  • Tarling, Nicholas (1999).The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia. Vol. 1 (part 2). Cambridge University Press.ISBN 0-521-66370-9.
  • Taylor, K.W. (2013),A History of the Vietnamese, Cambridge University Press,ISBN 978-0-520-07417-0
  • Thụy Khuê (2017).Vua Gia Long và người Pháp: khảo sát về ảnh hưởng của người Pháp trong giai đoạn triều Nguyễn (in Vietnamese). Nhà xuất bản Hồng Đức.ISBN 978-6049517655.OCLC 1079783921.
  • Toda, Ed (1882).Annam and its minor currency. Noronha & Sons.
  • Trần Trọng Kim (2018).Việt Nam sử lược. Hanoi: Kim Đồng Publishing House.ISBN 978-604-2-08603-5.
  • Verlag d. Industrie-Comptoirs (Austria) (1827).Neue allgemeine geographische und statistische Ephemeriden.
  • White, John (1824).A Voyage to Cochinchina. Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.
  • Whitmore, John K.; Zottoli, Brian (2016), "The Emergence of the state of Vietnam", in Peterson, Willard J. (ed.),The Cambridge History of China: Volume 9, The Ch'ing Dynasty to 1800, Part 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–233
  • Woodside, Alexander (1988) [1971].Vietnam and the Chinese model: a comparative study of Vietnamese and Chinese government in the first half of the nineteenth century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.ISBN 0-674-93721-X.
  • Wilcox, Wynn (2010).Vietnam and the West: New Approaches. Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program.ISBN 978-0-877-27782-8.
  • Woods, L. Shelton (2002).Vietnam: a global studies handbook.ABC-CLIO.ISBN 978-1-57607-416-9.
  • Ooi, Keat Gin (2004).Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor.ABC-CLIO.ISBN 978-1-57607-770-2.
  • Phan, Khoang (1985).Việt sử: xứ đàng trong, 1558–1777. Cuộc nam-tié̂n của dân-tộc Việt-Nam (in Vietnamese). Xuân thu.Archived from the original on 4 January 2024. Retrieved9 September 2021.
  • Knoblock, John; Riegel, Jeffrey (2001).The Annals of Lü Buwei. Stanford University Press.ISBN 978-0804733540.
  • Yue Hashimoto, Oi-kan (1972).Phonology of Cantonese.Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-08442-0.

Articles

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toNguyễn dynasty.
Nguyễn dynasty
Founding year:1802
Deposition:1945
Preceded byDynasty ofVietnam
1 June 1802 – 30 August 1945
Vacant
Overview






History
Sovereign Việt Nam
/ Đại Nam
(Nhà Nguyễn
thời độc lập)
French protectorate(s)
(Pháp thuộc, 法屬)
Japanese period
Government
Emperors
Ministries & agencies
Symbols
Provincial administration
French administration
Prominentmandarins
Military
Battles and wars
Prominent military personnel
Special administrative regions
Palaces &mausoleums
Palaces
Tombs
Society &culture
Education
Currency
Cash coins
Currency units
Colonial currencies
Laws
Treaties
Orders, decorations, and medals
Other topics
International
National
Artists
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nguyễn_dynasty&oldid=1321118433"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp