Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Longitudinal study conducted in New Zealand
New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study
Type of projectLongitudinal study
LocationNew Zealand
Key peopleChris Sibley
Launched2009
Websitewww.nzavs.auckland.ac.nz

TheNew Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS) is alongitudinal study conducted inNew Zealand.[1] The NZAVS was started in 2009 byChris Sibley,[2] a professor in psychology at theUniversity of Auckland. The NZAVS was inspired by major social surveys conducted internationally, such as theNational Election Studies, theWorld Values Survey and theGeneral Social Survey, and aims to provide a similar resource for New Zealand. As of January 29, 2024, the NZAVS research team had published over 250peer reviewed publications using data from the study.[3]


Sample details

[edit]

Questionnaires

[edit]

The NZAVS uses aself-report inventory to collect information. The questionnaire is administered via both postal mail and anonline survey. The NZAVS includes a large range of scales including those measuringself-esteem, national and personalwellbeing,satisfaction with life,religious beliefs,personality,psychological distress,ideologies,political andenvironmental attitudes.

Data structure

[edit]

The NZAVS has anested data structure.[1] Participants are modeled as the Level 1 or lower-level unit. The NZAVS contains geographic information frommesh blocks for each participant. Mesh blocks contain information about each participants local neighborhood based on census data from each mesh block. This information is modeled as the Level 2, or higher-level unit in many of the NZAVS research papers. Mesh blocks are small geographic area units, each containing roughly 100 people, with defined boundaries. Each mesh block is in turn nested within larger census area units (CAU; roughly 1000 people in size).Statistics New Zealand provide detailed demographic information about the population of each mesh block based on census data, such as median income, ethnic proportions and size, religious affiliation, etc. This information is integrated into the NZAVS datasets. Of particular note are the New Zealand Deprivation Index (an index of poverty or socio-economic status based on a principal components analysis of indicators of deprivation for each area unit);[4] and a CAU-basedGini coefficient derived byChris Sibley for use in the NZAVS, which provides an indicator of the income disparity within each region of New Zealand.

Data analysis

[edit]

The NZAVS is aquantitative study, and data analysis for the NZAVS is conducted primarily in Mplus.[5] Scripts outlining the statistical models developed using data from the NZAVS are provided online at the official NZAVSOpen Science Framework page.[3] These scripts are provided to help promote research collaboration and transparency in data analysis. The study employs many different types of statistical analyses, includingLatent Growth Modeling,Bayesian Linear Regression,Structural Equation Modeling, and analyses employingMixture model andMultilevel model designs.

Key findings

[edit]

The NZAVS has been central in answering a variety of important research questions. This section lists research findings from the NZAVS that have received academic and media attention.

COVID-19 Lockdowns in New Zealand

[edit]

Data from the NZAVS has been used to examine the impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on attitudes towards the government and institutional trust, as well as health and well-being.[6]

The March 15th Christchurch Terrorist Attack

[edit]

Following theterrorist attack in Christchurch on March 15, 2019, data from the NZAVS has been used to examine attitudes towards Muslims and satisfaction with the government.[7][8]

Religion and the Christchurch earthquakes

[edit]

NZAVS researchersJoseph Bulbulia andChris Sibley published a study inPLoS ONE looking at how theChristchurch earthquakes may be linked to change inreligious affiliation.[9]

Personality in New Zealand

[edit]

Data from the NZAVS has also been used to help validate and extend a public domainpersonality test assessing the Big-Six dimensions of personality in New Zealand. This personality scale is known as the Mini-IPIP6, and is based on theInternational Personality Item Pool.[10] The Mini-IPIP6 is a 24-item self-report personality measure, which extends the original Big-Five Mini-IPIP scale[11] to also include a sixth dimension of personality based on theHEXACO model of personality structure. The Mini-IPIP provides marker items for the following six dimensions of personality:Extraversion,Agreeableness,Conscientiousness,Neuroticism,Openness to Experience, andHonesty-humility. The Mini-IPIP6 has been validated for use in New Zealand in a series of peer-reviewed publications,[12][13][14] and is in thepublic domain.

The Multi-dimensional Model of Māori and Cultural Engagement

[edit]

NZAVS researchersCarla Houkamau andChris Sibley have also used data from the NZAVS to help design programmes that benefitMāori people particularly in relation to health and education. They studiedMāori identity and the factors that make Māori feel positive about themselves andMāori culture. This identity scale is known as theMulti-dimensional Model of Māori Identity and Cultural Engagement (MMM-ICE) and consists of six dimensions;(1) Group Membership Evaluation, (2) Socio-Political Consciousness, (3) Cultural Efficacy and Active Identity Engagement, (4) Spirituality, (5) Interdependent Self-Concept, and (6) Authenticity Beliefs.[15]

The Pacific Identity and Wellbeing Scale

[edit]

Sam Manuela, a senior lecturer from the University of Auckland, used the NZAVS data as part of his doctoral thesis to develop aculturally sensitiveself-report inventory to assessidentity andsubjective well-being among Pacific populations in New Zealand. The measure, known asThe Pacific Identity and Wellbeing Scale, assesses five distinct, yet interconnected dimensions of Pacific identity and wellbeing; (1) Group Membership Evaluation, (2) Pacific Connectedness and Belonging, (3) Religious Centrality and Embeddedness, (4) Perceived Familial Wellbeing, (5) Perceived Societal Wellbeing.[16]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ab"The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study". University of Auckland. Retrieved2024-01-29.
  2. ^"Professor Chris G Sibley". University of Auckland. Retrieved2024-01-29.
  3. ^abOsborne, Danny; Da Costa Marques, Mathew; Sibley, Chris G.; Barlow, Fiona; Bulbulia, Joseph A.; Overall, Nickola; Howard, Chloe; Satherley, Nicole; Hobbs, Matthew; Milfont, Taciano L.; Zubielevitch, Elena; Lilly, Kieren James (2024-01-29)."New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study".Open Science Framework.doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/75SNB.
  4. ^"NZDep2006 Index of Deprivation | Ministry of Health NZ". Health.govt.nz. 2007-08-02. Archived fromthe original on 2013-01-14. Retrieved2013-01-14.
  5. ^"Muthén & Muthén - Home Page". Statmodel.com. Retrieved2013-01-14.
  6. ^Sibley, Chris G.; Greaves, Lara M.; Satherley, Nicole; Wilson, Marc S.; Overall, Nickola C.; Lee, Carol H. J.; Milojev, Petar; Bulbulia, Joseph; Osborne, Danny; Milfont, Taciano L.; Houkamau, Carla A.; Duck, Isabelle M.; Vickers-Jones, Raine; Barlow, Fiona Kate (2020-07-01)."Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being".American Psychologist.75 (5):618–630.doi:10.1037/amp0000662.ISSN 1935-990X.PMID 32496074.S2CID 219312044.
  7. ^Satherley, Nicole; Yogeeswaran, Kumar; Osborne, Danny; Shanaah, Sadi; Sibley, Chris G. (2023-11-02)."Investigating the Effects of Right-Wing Terrorism on Government Satisfaction: A Time Course Analysis of the 2019 Christchurch Terror Attack".Studies in Conflict & Terrorism.46 (11):2174–2187.doi:10.1080/1057610X.2021.1913819.ISSN 1057-610X.S2CID 234871547.
  8. ^Shanaah, Sadi; Yogeeswaran, Kumar; Greaves, Lara; Bulbulia, Joseph A.; Osborne, Danny; Afzali, M. Usman; Sibley, Chris G. (2023-01-02)."Hate Begets Warmth? The Impact of an Anti-Muslim Terrorist Attack on Public Attitudes toward Muslims".Terrorism and Political Violence.35 (1):156–174.doi:10.1080/09546553.2021.1877673.hdl:2292/64005.ISSN 0954-6553.
  9. ^Sibley, C. G., & Bulbulia, J. (2012). Faith after an earthquake: a longitudinal study of religion and perceived health before and after the 2011 Christchurch New Zealand earthquake. PLoS ONE, 7, e49648.
  10. ^"International Personality Item Pool". Ipip.ori.org. Retrieved2013-01-14.
  11. ^Donnellan, M.B., Frederick, L., Oswald, B.M.B, & Lucas, R.E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192-203.
  12. ^Sibley, C. G. (2012). The Mini-IPIP6: Item Response Theory analysis of a short measure of the big-six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 41, 21-31.
  13. ^Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Moberly, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., Sengupta, N., Perry, R., West-Newman, T., Wilson, M. S., McLellan, L., Hoverd, W. J., & Robertson, A. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 142-159.
  14. ^Sibley, C. G., & Pirie, D. J. (in press). Personality in New Zealand: Scale norms and demographic differences in the Mini-IPIP6. New Zealand Journal of Psychology.
  15. ^Houkamau, C. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). The Multi-Dimensional Model of Māori Identity and Cultural Engagement. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 39, 8–28
  16. ^Manuela, S. & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The Pacific Identity and Wellbeing Scale (PIWBS): A Culturally-Appropriate Self Report Measure for Pacific Peoples in New Zealand. Social Indicators Research, 1, 83-103.

External links

[edit]
Data collection
Methodology
Survey errors
Data analysis
Applications
Major surveys
Associations
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Zealand_Attitudes_and_Values_Study&oldid=1292460523"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp