Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

New Party (United States)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "New Party" United States – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(October 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Political party in the United States
New Party
New Party logo
FounderDan Cantor
Joel Rogers
Founded1992 (1992)
Dissolved1998 (1998)
Preceded byCitizens Party
Succeeded byWorking Families Party
Headquarters88 Third Ave., Suite 313
Brooklyn, NY
11217
IdeologyProgressivism[1][2][3]

TheNew Party was athird political party in theUnited States that tried to re-introduce the practice ofelectoral fusion. In electoral fusion, the same candidate receives nomination from more than one political party and occupies more than one ballot line. Fusion was once common in the United States but is now commonly practiced only inNew York State, although it is allowed by law in seven other states. The party was active from 1992 to 1998. (There had been an earlier, unrelated New Party in 1968 that ranEugene McCarthy for president.)

Founding

[edit]

The New Party was founded in the early 1990s byDan Cantor, a former staffer forJesse Jackson's 1988 presidential campaign, and by political science, sociology and law professorJoel Rogers as an effort to break with the largely unsuccessful history of progressive third parties in the United States. Their strategy was to run candidates only where they had a reasonable chance of winning, and to nominate on their ballot line (or where this was not legally possible, to endorse) the candidate they favored more from another party.[4]

After a false start inNew York, the New Party built modestly successful chapters in several states. Some of these chapters—such as those inChicago andLittle Rock, Arkansas—had their main bases of support in the low-incomecommunity organizing groupACORN, along with some support from variouslabor unions. Other chapters—such as those inMinneapolis;Missoula, Montana;Montgomery County, Maryland; andDane County, Wisconsin, received institutional support from a variety of other labor unions and community organizations. These chapters built local political organizations that ran or endorsed candidates, primarily in localnon-partisan races but with occasional forays intoDemocratic Party primaries or (more rarely) traditional third party-style independent candidacies as well. Some New Party chapters introduced the idea of signed candidate contracts (saying the candidate agreed with the party's principles and would meet with party members after election) before endorsement, to encourage accountability after election—this was criticized by some of the party's detractors.[5][6][7] Party chapters were also active between elections, pressuring elected officials to pass legislation on issues such asliving wages andaffordable housing.

Influence

[edit]

InMadison, Wisconsin and some other cities, the New Party partnered withGreen Party candidates.[8]

The New Party endorsedBarack Obama in his successful 1996 run for theIllinois Senate.[9][10]

Although the party's founders hoped to foster a shift in the United States toward electoral fusion, they were not successful in doing so. Their hopes rested largely on theU.S. Supreme Court caseTimmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party. In 1997, the Court, in a 6–3 decision, upheld the Minnesota ban on cross-endorsing candidates, rejecting the New Party's argument that electoral fusion was a right protected by theFirst Amendment'sfreedom of association clause.[11][12]

After the Timmons case, the New Party quickly declined and several chapters disaffiliated. Perhaps the only and certainly the most successful surviving local chapter, known asProgressive Dane, remains active and relevant in Dane County, Wisconsin. New Party founder Daniel Cantor and other key staff members left to found theWorking Families Party of New York (1998),[12] an organization which has had considerable success in building a New Party-style organization within New York state, and which now has expanded into other states that have fusion voting.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Reynolds, David (2000). "New Party". In Ness, Immanuel; Ciment, James (eds.).The encyclopedia of third parties in America, Vol. 2. Armonk, N.Y: Sharpe Reference. pp. 396–402.ISBN 0-7656-8020-3. p. 396: From its beginning, the New Party articulated a distinct brand of progressive third-party politics.
  2. ^Haber (2001), p. 120: The New Party is a progressive electoral option—a challenge to the two-party system that has dominated electoral politics in the United States.
  3. ^Sifry (2002), p. 230: For convenience, and because they believed it was important that the party seem "fresh, simple, and above all, not weighted down with ideological baggage and labels," they proposed to call their new experiment the "New Party." Their intended audience were progressives, defined as "people who are committed to democracy" as opposed to liberals, who they wrote "don't believe working people have much capacity to govern their own affairs.27
  4. ^Rogers, Joel (October 4, 1993)."Viewpoint: Is it third party time?"(PDF).In These Times.17 (23):28–29.ISSN 0160-5992. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on December 15, 2010. RetrievedMay 25, 2011.
  5. ^Haber (2001), p. 127: Our preferred candidates subsequently were notified and asked if they were willing to sign an agreement that said nothing more than that they agreed with our party principles and mission statement and that they would meet with us on a regular basis once in office to exchange information and work collaboratively to implement these ideals. While most of those we interviewed found nothing wrong with this process, and in fact understood and supported its importance, our detractors found it cause to complain loudly.
  6. ^New Party (April 1994)."Progress report #5 -- On the move with the New Party". Brooklyn, N.Y.: New Party. Archived fromthe original on July 9, 1997. RetrievedOctober 16, 2008.
  7. ^New Party of Illinois (c. 1999)."The New Party of Illinois candidate contract". Chicago: New Party of Illinois. Archived fromthe original on October 23, 1999. RetrievedOctober 16, 2008.
  8. ^Nichols, John (July 10, 2000)."Three's company".In These Times.24 (16):4–5.ISSN 0160-5992. RetrievedMay 25, 2011.
  9. ^New Party (March 1996)."March update". Brooklyn, N.Y.: New Party. Archived fromthe original on July 9, 1997. RetrievedJuly 8, 2012.
  10. ^Nichols, John (January 2009)."How to push Obama".The Progressive.73 (1):20–23.ISSN 0033-0736. RetrievedJuly 8, 2012.
  11. ^Legal Information Institute (1997)."Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party (95-1608), 520 U.S. 351 (1997)". Ithaca, N.Y.: Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. RetrievedOctober 8, 2008.
  12. ^abIreland, Doug (March 18, 2002)."Party animals (book review ofSpoiling for a Fight: Third-Party Politics in America by Micah L. Sifry)"(PDF).In These Times.26 (8):22–23.ISSN 0160-5992. RetrievedMay 25, 2011.

References

[edit]

External links

[edit]
  • New Party (1999)."New Party documents". Brooklyn, N.Y.: New Party. Archived fromthe original on January 17, 2001. RetrievedOctober 13, 2008. press coverage archived on the New Party's website
Major parties
Third parties
Larger
Smaller
Defunct parties
Major parties
Third parties
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Party_(United_States)&oldid=1316216660"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp