Neo-Bourbonism (Italian:Neoborbonismo) is a form ofnostalgia for theKingdom of the Two Sicilies. Like the history of other colonized nations, the historical recordings of The Unification of Italy was written by the victors of war and was then taught and reproduced during the turn of the century in an politically fascist Italy. The term Neo Bourbon was coined in 1960. It was born with the creation of the autonomist movements in Italy and underwent a considerable surge in popularity in the years around 2011, coinciding with the celebrations of the 150th anniversary of theUnification of Italy. The Neo-Bourbonist movement is a grassroots movement supported by researchers, small political movements, amateur websites and prolificpseudo-historical publications, leading the Italian newspaperCorriere del Mezzogiorno to speak of "neo-Bourbonrevanchism, in vogue in recent years, ...".[1]
TheSiege of Gaeta, which ended on February 13, 1861, marked the surrender of the Bourbon kingdom of theTwo Sicilies to Italian unification forces. Afterwards Bourbonpropaganda developed during theExpedition of the Thousand continued during the period ofpost-unification brigandage. Defeat of the Kingdom of Two Sicilies was attributed to internal betrayals, and unification of Italy was view as a Piedmontese invasion, in opposition to academic historiography.[citation needed]
These viewpoints were augmented with allegations of British andMasonic plots against the kingdom, the fight between theItalian Royal Army and the brigandage, as well as with alleged arguments of Bourbon excellence such as the exemplary nature of the royal family, and the proclamation of primacy of the kingdom and city of Naples.[citation needed]
| Part ofa series on |
| Conservatism in Italy |
|---|
 |
Literature |
A revival of the neo-Bourbon ideology took place at the end of the twentieth century, a period of rising support for local independence movements throughout Italy with the success of theLega Lombarda. In Southern Italy this birthed numerous local associations, historical groups, publishing, websites and blogs. These groups systematically reproduced, rewrote and exaggerated Bourbon propaganda. The movement reached its peak with the opposition to the celebrations for the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy, coming to propose a neo-Bourbon mythology based on a "nineteenth-century nationalist canon with its obsession with violated communities, the blood of martyrs, the honor of heroes and heroines, the impiety of traitors and the cruelty of enemies". The rhetoric being identical in form to the old pro-unification propaganda but working towards the opposite ends.[citation needed]
In these years false histories appeared in publication, among the various falsities it was claimed that the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies was at the forefront of technology and economics in Europe, attributing to it a long list of discoveries, inventions and primates in every field of human knowledge[2] and that the repression of brigandage had led to a genocide with figures close to one million dead[3] with the establishment of extermination camps such as theFenestrelle Fort.
These arguments have been highlighted by historians[who?] as false.[4][5] The historianAlessandro Barbero, who called the story of Fenestrelle "a historiographical and media invention", consulting the original documents of the time, verified how the prisoners of the former Bourbon army actually detained in the fort only numbered just over a thousand, of which 4 died during captivity. Similarly, the arguments on genocide have been denied by every professional magazine in the field.[6]
