Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Nazareth Inscription

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Marble tablet inscribed in Greek
The inscription, in a facsimile from its original publication in 1930.

TheNazareth Inscription orNazareth decree is a marble tablet inscribed inGreek with an edict from an unnamedCaesar ordering capital punishment for anyone caught disturbing graves or tombs.[1] It is dated on the basis ofepigraphy to the first half of the 1st century AD. Its provenance is unknown, but a French collector acquired the stone fromNazareth. It is now in the collections of theLouvre.[2][3]

The text is read by scholars in the context ofRoman law pertaining to exhumation and reburial, mentioned also byPliny.[4][5] The inscription is of interest to some authors for its indirect relationship toJesus of Nazareth, even though the text contains no reference to him. A 2020 study of the marble's isotopes showed that the tablet came from a quarry in the Greek island ofKos, casting much doubt on the theory that it has any relationship to Jesus, and it may instead have been inscribed as a reaction to the desecration of the grave of the Kos tyrantNikias circa 20 BCE.[6]

Description and provenance

[edit]
Map of the Decapolis (cities in black) and nearby areas including unmarked Samaria which is the northern part of theRoman province of Judea.

The marble tablet measures 24 by 15 inches, with thekoine Greek inscription appearing in fourteen lines. It was acquired in 1878 byWilhelm Fröhner (1834–1925), and sent fromNazareth to Paris. Fröhner entered the item in hismanuscript inventory with the note "Dalle de marbre envoyé de Nazareth en 1878." Though indicating that the marble was sent from Nazareth, the note does not state that it was discovered there. Nazareth was a significantantiquities market in the 1870s, as wasJerusalem,[7] and may have been "nothing more than … a shipping center" for the item.[8] Since 1925 it has been in theBibliothèque nationale, Paris, displayed in theCabinet des Médailles.

The inscription, with afacsimile, was published in 1930 byFranz Cumont,[9] who had been alerted to it byRostovtseff.[7]

Text

[edit]

The Greek used in the inscription is relatively poor.[10] Clyde E. Billington provides the following English translation:[11][12]

Edict of Caesar
It is my decision [concerning] graves and tombs—whoever has made them for the religious observances of parents, or children, or household members—that these remain undisturbed forever. But if anyone legally charges that another person has destroyed, or has in any manner extracted those who have been buried, or has moved with wicked intent those who have been buried to other places, committing a crime against them, or has moved sepulcher-sealing stones, against such a person, I order that a judicial tribunal be created, just as [is done] concerning the gods in human religious observances, even more so will it be obligatory to treat with honor those who have been entombed. You are absolutely not to allow anyone to move [those who have been entombed]. But if [someone does], I wish that [violator] to suffer capital punishment under the title of tomb-breaker.

Legal and cultural background

[edit]

Violatio sepulchri ('tomb violation') was a crime under Roman law, as noted byCicero (d. 43 BC). The Nazareth Inscription prescribes the death penalty for the offense.[13] A tomb at whichfuneral rites had been duly performed became alocusreligiosus, belonging to the divine rather than to the human realm.[14][13]: 144  Roman Imperial tombstones are often inscribed with a curse(defixio) against anyone who desecrates the grave.[13]: 144 

Analysis

[edit]
Coin showing image ofNikias of Kos, Ruler ofKos from c. 50 BCE to c. 20 BCE. The Nazareth inscription is believed by researchers to be in response to disturbing his grave.[6]

Scholars have analysed the language and style of the Nazareth inscription and attempted to date it. It has been discussed in the context of tomb-robbery inantiquity.

Francis de Zulueta dates the inscription, based on the style of lettering, to between 50 B.C. and A.D. 50, but most likely around the turn of the era.[15] As the text uses the plural form "gods", Zulueta concluded it most likely came from the Hellenized district of theDecapolis. Like Zulueta, J. Spencer Kennard, Jr. noted that the reference to "Caesar" indicated that "the inscription must have been derived from somewhere inSamaria or Decapolis;Galilee was ruled by a client-prince until the reign ofClaudius".[8]: 232 

It is of interest to historians of theNew Testament.[7]: 89  Some authors, citing the inscription's supposed Galilean origin, interpreted it as Imperial Rome's clear reaction to theempty tomb ofJesus[2][7]: 89  and specifically as an edict ofClaudius, who reigned AD 41-54.[16][17] If the inscription was originally set up inGalilee, it can date no earlier than 44, the year Roman rule was imposed there.[2]

A 2020 isotope study of the marble published in theJournal of Archaeological Science suggests another interpretation.[18] The scientists took a sample from the back of the tablet, and usedlaser ablation to help determine the isotope ratio of the stone.[6] According to the authors of the study, the enrichment ofcarbon 13 and depletion ofOxygen 18 may identify the source of the marble as the upper quarry in the island ofKos. The team proposed that the edict was issued byAugustus after the desecration of the tomb of the Kos tyrantNikias.[19][6]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Gager, John G. (1992).Curse tablets and binding spells from the ancient world. New York u.a.: Oxford Univ. Press. p. 179.ISBN 978-0-19-506226-7.
  2. ^abcSmallwood, E. Mary (1976).The Jews under Roman Rule: From Pompey to Diocletian: A Study in Political Relations. Leiden: Brill. p. 213.
  3. ^Millard, Alan (2000).Reading and writing in the time of Jesus. New York, NY: New York Univ. Press. p. 110.ISBN 978-0-8147-5637-9.
  4. ^Pliny,Epistles 10.68f.
  5. ^Phillips, C. Robert (2007), "Approaching Roman Religion: The Case forWissenschaftsgeschichte", in Rüpke, Jörg (ed.),A companion to Roman religion ([Nachdr.]. ed.), Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, p. 14,ISBN 978-1-4051-2943-5
  6. ^abcdGibbons, Ann (February 28, 2020)."Tablet thought to have guarded tombs after Jesus's death may not be what it seems". Science Magazine.Archived from the original on February 29, 2020. RetrievedFebruary 29, 2020.
  7. ^abcdMetzger, Bruce M. (1980), "The Nazareth inscription once again",New Testament studies: philological, versional, and patristic, New Testament tools and studies, vol. 10, Leiden: Brill, pp. 75–94,ISBN 90-04-06163-0 Metzger gives a summary of discussion among New Testament scholars and ancient historians alike.
  8. ^abKennard, J. Spencer (December 1955). "The Burial of Jesus".Journal of Biblical Literature.74 (4):227–238.doi:10.2307/3261668.JSTOR 3261668. noting the coincidental connection with the burial of Jesus made by Baldensperger, Cumont and Momigliano.
  9. ^Franz Cumont, "Un réscrit impérial sur la violation de sépulture" inRevue Historique163 1930:341-66.
  10. ^Elwell, Philip W.; Comfort, Walter A., eds. (2008).Tyndale Bible dictionary. Carol Stream, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers. p. 939.ISBN 978-1-4143-1945-2.
  11. ^Billington, Clyde E. "The Nazareth Inscription: Proof of the Resurrection of Christ?".Artifax (Spring 2005).
  12. ^"SEG 8:13 - PHI Greek Inscriptions".epigraphy.packhum.org.Archived from the original on 2017-02-23. Retrieved2017-02-23.
  13. ^abcKyle, Donald G. (1998).Spectacles of death in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge. pp. 143–144.ISBN 978-0-415-09678-2. citing Cicero,De Legibus 3 andDigest 47.12, with additional citations of modern scholarship.
  14. ^Gaius,Inst. II.3, 6, 9;Clust. 3.44.2
  15. ^De Zulueta, F. (1932). "Violation of Sepulture in Palestine at the Beginning of the Christian Era".Journal of Roman Studies.22 (2):184–197.doi:10.2307/296822.JSTOR 296822.S2CID 164019744.
  16. ^Cadbury, Henry J. (1955).The book of Acts in history (2004 ed.). Eugene, Or.: Harper. p. 117.ISBN 978-1-59244-915-6.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  17. ^Green, Michael (1967).Man alive!. Downers Grove, Ill.: Inter-Varsity Press. p. 36.ISBN 978-0-87784-537-9. "It is an imperial edict, belonging either to the reign ofTiberius (A.D. 14-37) or of Claudius (A.D. 41-54). And it is an invective, backed with heavy sanctions, against meddling around with tombs and graves! It looks very much as if the news of the empty tomb had got back toRome in a garbled form. (Pontius Pilate would have had to report: and he would obviously have said that the tomb had been rifled). This edict, it seems, is the imperial reaction."
  18. ^Harper, Kyle; McCormick, Michael; Hamilton, Matthew; Chantal, Peiffert; Raymond, Michels; Engel, Michael (April 2020)."Establishing the provenance of the Nazareth Inscription: Using stable isotopes to resolve a historic controversy and trace ancient marble production"(PDF).Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports.30 102228.Bibcode:2020JArSR..30j2228H.doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102228.S2CID 212890727.
  19. ^Bower, Bruce (2020-03-20)."The Nazareth Inscription's origins may refute ties to Jesus' resurrection".Science News.Archived from the original on 2020-03-20. Retrieved2020-03-21.

External links

[edit]
Building
Antiquities
Near East
and Middle East
Ancient Egypt
Greece andRome,
Etruscan
Byzantine
Paintings
French
Italian
Northern
Spanish
English
American
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nazareth_Inscription&oldid=1313907561"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp