| National Liberation Army | |
|---|---|
| Ejército de Liberación Nacional | |
_(logo).png) Logo of the ELN, text translates to "Not a single step back, liberation or death." | |
| Leaders |
|
| Dates of operation | 1964–present |
| Active regions | In Colombia: especially in the departments ofArauca,Cauca,Choco,Norte de Santander andNariño and the subregion ofBajo Cauca Antioquia. Also active in Venezuela.[1] |
| Ideology | |
| Political position | Far-left |
| Size | 5,000 (According to the CIA)[3] |
| Part of | Simón Bolívar Guerrilla Coordinating Board (1987–1994)[4] |
| Allies |  Venezuela (from 2014) FARC-EP[6] |
| Opponents | |
| Battles and wars | |
| Designated as a terrorist group by | |
| Flag |  |
TheNational Liberation Army (Spanish:Ejército de Liberación Nacional,ELN) is a far-leftguerrilla insurgency group[8] involved in the continuingColombian conflict,[9] which has existed in Colombia since 1964. The ELN advocates a compositecommunist ideology ofMarxism–Leninism andLatin American liberation theology. In 2013, it was estimated that the ELN forces consisted of between 1,380 and 3,000 guerrillas.[10][11][12] According to former ELN national directorate member Felipe Torres, one-fifth of ELN supporters have taken up arms.[13] The ELN has been classified as aterrorist organization by the governments of Colombia,[14] the United States,[15] Canada,[16] New Zealand,[17] and the European Union.[18]
 | This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The National Liberation Army was founded in 1964, byFabio Vásquez Castaño and other Colombian rebels trained inCuba. The group included "urban intellectuals" influenced byChe Guevara andFidel Castro.[19] Later, the ELN was headed by a series of Roman Catholic priests, exponents of liberation theology. Most notable wasCamilo Torres Restrepo (1929–66), a well-known university professor (egalitarian and Marxist–Leninist) who was openly critical of the what he considered grossly unequal income among thesocial classes of Colombia. His attraction to theradical ideas of liberation theology led him to join the ELN, a guerrilla army intent upon effecting therevolutionary praxis of liberation theology among the poor people of Colombia. Priest Camilo was killed in his first combat as an ELN guerrilla, and so became the exemplar ELN soldier, to be emulated by ELN guerrillas and other liberation theology priests from the lower ranks of the Roman Catholic priesthood.
In the years following its foundation, it brought together more students and young activists from cities than peasants, a social composition that distinguishes it from theFARC guerrillas, who are essentially peasants.[20]
In the 1970s, after suffering military defeat and internal crises, the ELN was commanded by the Spanish priest FatherManuel Pérez Martínez (1943–98), aliasEl Cura Pérez, who shared leadership with Nicolás Rodríguez Bautista, alias "Gabino".El Cura Pérez presided over the National Liberation Army as one of its most recognized figures until he died ofhepatitis B in 1998. He was instrumental in establishing the ideology of the ELN, a composite of Cuban revolutionary theory and liberation theology that proposes the establishment in Colombia of aChristian and communist regime to resolve the socioeconomic problems of chronicpolitical corruption,poverty, and the exclusion of most Colombians from their country's government.
The ELN guerrillas survived the heavy fighting in theColombian National Army's Operation Anorí (1973–74), and then reconstituted their forces, with partial assistance from the Colombian Government of PresidentAlfonso López Michelsen (1974–78), who allowed the ELN to break from and escape encirclement by the Colombian army. López Michelsen helped the ELN in the hope of initiating peace negotiations with them in order to end the civil war. After this, the ELN resumed financing its military operations by means ofkidnap forransom, theextortion of money from Colombian and foreignpetroleum companies and thetaxation of the privateillegal drug trade of Colombia.
The ELN did not participate in the peace negotiations conducted between the Colombian government of PresidentAndrés Pastrana Arango (1998–2002) and FARC, yet did participate in an exploratory conference about possibly participating in peace negotiations. A Colombian government initiative towards granting the ELN ademilitarized zone in the southern region of theBolívar Department was thwarted byright-wing political pressure from theUnited Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC) whoseparamilitarymercenaries conduct anti-guerrilla operations in that part of the department.
Peace talks began in 2022, but in August 2024 the Colombian government announced an end to a six-month ceasefire, as the ELN had returned to its practice of kidnapping civilians for ransom.[21]
Previous contacts continued during the early days of theÁlvaro Uribe Vélez government but eventually were severed, neither party being fully trusting of the other. Only in mid-2004 did the ELN and the government began to make a series of moves that, with the announced mediation of theVicente Fox government ofMexico, lead to another round of exploratory talks.
On 24 July 2004 the ELN apparently abductedMisael Vacca Ramírez, theRoman CatholicBishop of Yopal, though their reasons were not clarified. The kidnappers said that Ramírez would be released with a message, but "Francisco Galán", a senior jailed ELN commander who has often acted as an intermediary between the government and the ELN's high command, said he did not know whether the group was responsible. The Bishop was subsequently released by ELN members, in good health, on 27 July, after his kidnapping had been condemned byAmnesty International andPope John Paul II, among others. As far as is publicly known, he did not have any message to announce on behalf of the ELN.
Eventually, the ELN questioned Mexico's participation in the talks, arguing that it did not have confidence in the actions of a government which voted againstFidel Castro's Cuba during aUnited Nations vote. This led the Mexican government to end its participation.
In December 2005, the ELN and the Colombian government began a new round of exploratory talks in Havana, Cuba, with the presence of the ELN's military commander "Antonio García", as well as "Francisco Galán" and "Ramiro Vargas". This was considered the direct result of three months of previous consultations with representatives of different sectors of public society through the figure of a "House of Peace" (Casa de Paz in Spanish).
Representatives fromNorway,Spain andSwitzerland joined both parties at the talks as observers.
The talks ended by 22 December and both parties agreed to meet again in January 2006.[22] After a series of preliminary meetings, the next round of talks was later rescheduled for early-mid February.[23]
During the February talks, which moved at a slow pace, the government decided to formally suspend capture orders for "Antonio García" and "Ramiro Vargas", recognizing them as negotiators and, implicitly, as political actors. The move was also joined by the creation of what was termed an alternative and complementary mechanism that could be used to deal with difficult issues and matters that concerned both parties, outside the main negotiating table. A formal negotiation process has yet to begin.[24]
On 23 March, the ELN freed a Colombian soldier that it had kidnapped on 25 February, delivering him to theRed Cross, saying that it was a unilateral sign of good will.[25]
The ELN's "Antonio García" expected to visit Cuba from 17 to 28 April, participating in different meetings with representatives of several political, economic and social sectors. The third round of the exploratory talks would have originally taken place in La Habana, Cuba from 2 to 12 May.[26]
The third round of talks was later moved to take place from 25 to 28 April.Both parties reiterated their respect for the content and spirit of all previous agreements, and that they would continue working towards the design of a future peace process. The Colombian government and the ELN intend to study documents previously elaborated during the "House of Peace" stage, as well as documents from other participants and observers.[27] Both parties expected to meet again after Colombia's 28 May presidential elections.
On 30 August 2007 the ELN said that in the statement the dialogues in Havana ended without agreement because of "two different conceptions of peace and methods to get to it".
Colombian PresidentÁlvaro Uribe invited ELN spokesman "Francisco Galán" for new talks about peace on 3 April 2008.[28] The two spoke in the presidential palace. After the meeting Galán says the ELN will return to the negotiation table.[29] The ELN released a press note shortly after that saying the rebel group "does not share the views" of "Galán" and dismissed him as their spokesman. The Marxist rebels did say they will continue to let "Galán" negotiate between the Colombian government and the rebels.[30]
On 7 December, 2008 18 ELN guerillas surrendered to the Colombian army in the northwestern province ofChocó.[31]
In March 2016 the resumption of peace talks between the parties were announced, but were put on hold until the release of all hostages still kept by the ELN.[32] The last hostages were finally released in February 2017 and the talks commenced in the same month, with Pablo Beltrán andJuan Camilo Restrepo heading the delegations of the ELN and the Colombian government, respectively.[32]
On 4 September 2017, the ELN and PresidentJuan Manuel Santos of Colombia announced a truce to begin on 1 October and to last at least until 12 January 2018.[33]
From 25 to 29 May the group had a ceasefire so that "those who want to vote can do so peacefully" during the2018 Colombian presidential election. The ELN said it "reserve[s] the right to defend [themselves] in case of an attack" by security forces or other armed groups.[34]
On 17 January 2019, the ELN performed a car bombing at theGeneral Santander National Police Academy inBogotá, Colombia. The truck detonated and killed 21 people, including the perpetrator, and injured 68 others.[35][36] It was the deadliest attack on the Colombian capital since the2003 El Nogal Club bombing and the first attack on the capital since the2017 Centro Andino bombing.[37] The ELN accepted responsibility for the attack and justified it as a response to the bombings made by the Colombian government during the unilateral ceasefire.[38]
As a result of the bombing, PresidentIván Duque Márquez announced on 18 January that peace dialogue between the Government of Colombia and the ELN was officially suspended. Duque also demanded that Cuba extradite the ten ELN leaders that found refuge on the island nation during peace talks and the reactivation of theirInterpol Red Notices, and criticizedVenezuela for providing refuge for the ELN on the Colombia-Venezuela border.[39][40] In response to the request, Cuba's Foreign Minister announced that Cuba would abide by the protocols of ongoing negotiations between both parties.[41]
TheRedes Foundation denounced in the Colombian Public Ministry that armed groups made up of National Liberation Army members and FARC dissidents, supported by theBolivarian National Police and FAES officials, murdered two Venezuelan protesters, Eduardo José Marrero and Luigi Ángel Guerrero, during a protest in the frontier city ofSan Cristóbal, inTáchira state. Other protesters were injured during the shooting.[42]
In March 2020, the National Liberation Army (ELN) declared a unilateral one-month ceasefire during the outbreak of theCOVID-19 pandemic, to start on 1 April.[43]
General Luis Fernando Navarro asserted on 5 January 2021 that the ELN lost 700 members through targeted attacks in 2020, and that it still had 2,500 armed combatants.[44]
On 21 November 2022, after theelection ofGustavo Petro breathed new life into the peace process, delegates of the ELN and the newColombian government met in Venezuela to resume the peace talks that faltered in January 2019, after the Bogotá car bombing.[45] The negotiations continued into the first week of December 2022, with representatives of the ELN and the Colombian government meeting for the continuation of peace talks inEl Ávila National Park inCaracas.[46] On the occasion, ELN chief negotiator Pablo Beltrán stated that Colombians have to work towards reconciliation and recreate a new nation in peace and equity and in a similar spirit Danilo Rueda, the High Commissioner for Peace in Colombia, stated that peace is not only a question of laying down arms, but a process linked to the need for change.[46] Following the conclusion of the first round of talks, the ELN announced a unilateral holiday truce lasting from24 December 2022 until 2 January 2023.[47]
After Mexico agreed to be an official guarantor to the peace process, it was chosen as the host country for the second round of talks, expected to begin in January 2023.[48]With the addition of Mexico, along with Cuba,Chile, Norway and Venezuela, there are now five guarantor countries to the peace process.[49]
After misunderstandings arose regarding a bilateral ceasefire between the ELN and the government, an emergency meeting took place on 21 January in Caracas to reassure both sides of their intentions and to set a date for the second round of negotiations, scheduled to commence on 12 February 2023.[49]
Prior to the restart of peace talks, the influential ELN-commander Antonio Garcia criticised the approach of the Colombian government, stating that "the peace process cannot be used as an 'umbrella' for other issues".[50] The former commander of the ELN, Carlos Velandia, dismissed this stance as posturing ahead of the next round of talks, which commenced on time in Mexico City, opining that the ELN wants to negotiate its own accord and not be lumped in with other groups.[50]
The Colombian government appointedVera Grabe Loewenherz as its head negotiator with the ELN in December 2023.[51]
In 17 January 2025 the Colombian government suspended peace talks yet again after a massacre carried out in Tibú due tocontinuous gunfights with FARC-EP dissidents which resulted in around 50 civilians killed.[52]
On 17 October 2025, the U.S.Department of Defense carried out a strike on an alleged ELN drug vessel, killing three as a part of the2025 United States strikes on Venezuelan boats and the2025 United States naval deployment in the Caribbean.[53]
The ideology of ELN has been described as "Catholic Marxism",[54] as well as "Marxism-Leninism interspersed with revolutionary Catholicism", and the organization embraces Roman Catholic morality, which makes the group heavily utilize the concept of martyrdom and refuse to take part in the Colombian drug trade. ELN also stresses Catholic moralism, including the need to "live with dignity" by adhering to Catholic teaching. The ELN has had links with the Catholic Church ever since its foundation in 1964, as it has been founded by radical Catholic priests.[55]
It adheres to liberation theology, which includes the notion that Catholicism requires the creation of a fair and equal society based on socialist principles, and an anti-imperialist agenda that primarily targets corporations active in the Colombian extractive sector.[56] The Catholic character of the party was further developed by its former leaders,Camilo Torres Restrepo andManuel Peréz, who were Catholic priests.[57] Its ideology has been described as "a violent brand of liberation theology that mixes Marxist politics with the Roman Catholic Church".[58]
Apart from its Catholicism, the ELN is heavily tied to Revolutionary Cuba andCastroism. The founders of ELN trained inHavana, and the organization follows the ideology offoquismo based on writings ofChe Guevara; thus its ideology is also described as a "Che Guevara type of communist ideology".[59]José Míguez Bonino classified ELN as a Castroist and Guevarist movement, noting that Cuba was closely involved in the training and preparation of its foundation. The ELN did not adhere to either the Soviet or Chinese ideological lines and instead became independent, which resulted in the organization accepting clergy into its ranks.[60]
The ELN was designated as aForeign Terrorist Organization by theU.S. State Department on October 8, 1997. The ELN was one of 30 Foreign Terrorist Organizations included on the original FTO list, which also designated FARC as an FTO.[61] The ELN was listed because of its reputation for ransomkidnappings and armed attacks on Colombia's infrastructure. In April 2004, theEuropean Union added the ELN to its list ofterrorist organizations for those actions and its breaches ofhumanitarian law.[9]
The ELN's main source of income are businesses andmiddle class civilians in its areas of operation. To enforce these "taxes", they frequently take civilians captive to use as leverage. While the ELN uses the terms "war taxes" and "retentions" for these actions, critics insist they constitute "extortion" and "kidnapping".[62]
According toClaudia Calle, spokesperson forPaís Libre, a Colombian foundation for victims of abductions, 153 hostages had died "in the hands of the ELN" between 2000 and 2007.[63] According to País Libre, ELN abducted over 3,000 people between 2000 and 2007.[64]
The ELN also occasionally operated with theFARC-EP, and like FARC, it has targeted civilians, according to a February 2005 report by the United NationsHigh Commissioner for Human Rights: "During 2004, the FARC-EP and the ELN carried out a series of attacks against the civilian population, including several massacres of civilians and kidnappings by the FARC-EP. There were occasional joint actions by the FARC-EP and the ELN."[65]
In mid-2006, mutual rivalries between local FARC and ELN forces escalated into hostilities inArauca, along the border with Venezuela. According to theBBC, "the FARC have for some years moved to take over ELN territory near the Venezuelan border, and the smaller rebel army reacted by killing several FARC militants". A statement posted on FARC's homepage accused the ELN of "attacks that we only expected from the enemy".[66]
On 26 May 2008 the ELN wrote a letter to the FARC secretariat, seeking cooperation with Colombia's largest rebel group to overcome "the difficulties we are experiencing in today's Colombian insurgent movement".[67] The letter was published on the ELN website.[68] On 27 June 2017, FARC ceased to be an armed group, disarming itself and handing over its weapons to the United Nations.[69]
According toInSight Crime, the ELN andFARC dissidents met together in Venezuela to form a potential alliance in October 2018. Sources based in theArauca department in Colombia provided the information, with reports that the groups would participate in illicit activity together. It was also alleged that former FARC commanderIván Márquez participated in the talks with the ELN.[70]
Since the 1990s, the ELN began to establish positions in the western border states of Venezuela.[71] The ELN grew close to Venezuelan officials during the tenure of Venezuelan presidentHugo Chávez, with Chávez approving relationships with the group.[71][72]
InSight Crime also states that Venezuelan presidentNicolás Maduro was tolerant of the ELN, explaining that "ELN's expansion in Venezuela has been marked by the Maduro administration's inaction and even encouragement towards the group"; according to the group, the ELN operates in at least 12 of the 23 states of Venezuela.[73] The Venezuelan NGO Fundación Redes has reported that the Venezuelan military had possibly armed ELN members.[74] In 2019, ELN supported Maduro during theVenezuelan presidential crisis and said they "will fight" US troops if they invade Venezuela.[75]
The ELN has received support from theTupamaro movement in Venezuela, a Venezuelancolectivo and political party. The Tupamaro movement supported the ELN's dialogue with the Colombian government, stating, "The Tupamaro Revolutionary Movement, now more than ever, stands in solidarity with this sister organization in the historic struggle against theneo-Granadian oligarchy andYankee imperialism. We strongly ratify all of our support for the guerrillas and the ELN High Command, in the process that is developed with the participation of the Colombian people in the resolution of the armed conflict and the construction of peace with social justice".[5]
Torres Restrepo applied elements of liberation theology to the ELN's political program.
They will be assisted by the Roman Catholic Church, from which many of the ELN's founders – priests and seminary students – hail.
The ELN confirmed that their organization had perpetrated the attacks, but stated they had "occurred in the middle of a complex situation of conflict in the country." The Marxist rebel group, founded by rouge Roman Catholic priests in 1964, did, however, reiterate its willingness to continue talks with the government of Juan Manuel Santos, and raised the possibility of extending the cease-fire.
The ELN, which first opened fire with bolt-action rifles in the early 1960s, was founded by radical Roman Catholic priests and Marxist intellectuals inspired by Cuban revolutionaries, such as Fidel Castro and "Che" Guevara.
The ELN, founded by radical Roman Catholic priests in 1964, has sought peace with the government before but made little progress.
The ELN, founded by radical Roman Catholic priests in 1964, is widely considered to be less centrally controlled than FARC was.
But Colombia was not content with simply exporting cocaine to Venezuela. By the 1990s, it was also exporting its civil conflict, with the rebel armies of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – FARC) and the National Liberation Army (Ejército de Liberación Nacional – ELN) taking up residence in Venezuela's border states. Both groups have long been involved in the drug trade and developed close links with Venezuelan officials, often with the blessing of President Hugo Chávez.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
