 | |
| Founders | Trita Parsi, Babak Talebi, Farzin Illich |
|---|---|
| Established | January 2002 (2002-01) |
| President | Jamal Abdi |
| Location | Washington ,DC , |
| Website | www |
TheNational Iranian American Council (NIAC;Persian:شورای ملی ایرانیان آمریکا) is a lobbying group widely viewed as the de facto "Iran Lobby" inWashington, D.C. due to its history of lobbying for stances on behalf of, and aligned with,the Islamic Republic of Iran.[1][2][3][4][5][6]NIAC Action PAC is its affiliated political action committee and was formed in 2015.[7]
The organization's first president wasTrita Parsi who also its cofounder. Its president is now Jamal Abdi.[8]
From 2002 to 2021, NIAC released its financials, calling "transparency one of its core values," but no financials have been released since 2022.[9]
NIAC was founded in 2002 byTrita Parsi, Babak Talebi, and Farzin Illich to promote Iranian-American relations.[10] In 1999, Parsi co-authored a paper named "Iran-Americans: The bridge between two nations" which explained the need for an organization like NIAC.[11]
In 2007, Arizona-based Iranian-American journalist Seid Hassan Daioleslam began publicly asserting that NIAC was lobbying on behalf ofIran. In response, NIAC sued him for defamation. In 2012, it was dismissed by the court on the grounds of not having significant evidences that would constitute defamation.[1][12] As part of his decision, Judge Bates concluded that NIAC president Parsi's work was "not inconsistent with the idea that he was first and foremost an advocate for the regime." The judge came to the conclusion that it is reasonable to rationally assert that NIAC is lobbying on behalf of theIranian government. In addition, the judge also concluded, "Nothing in this opinion should be construed as a finding that defendant’s articles were true."[12] In 2015, NIAC was monetary sanctioned by two circuit judges and a senior circuit judge, in favor of Daioleslam.[13]
As a result of the lawsuits, many internal documents were released, which formerWashington Times correspondentEli Lake stated "raise questions" about whether the organization had violated U.S. lobbying regulations.[14]Andrew Sullivan responded to the story inThe Atlantic, suggesting the motive of the story was to "smear" Parsi's reputation.[15]
A March 2015 column by Eli Lake in Bloomberg View asserted that the emails showed cooperation between Parsi and the then Iran ambassador to the United Nations and current Foreign MinisterMohammad Javad Zarif.[16] NIAC's webpage confirms "that Parsi developed a relationship with Zarif after interviewing him on "numerous occasions for his book." It states that Parsi made introductions for members of the U.S. Congress to meet with Zarif at the request of the lawmakers.[17] According to The Washington Time's article, "Law enforcement experts who reviewed some of the documents, which were made available to The Times by the defendant in the suit, say e-mails between Mr. Parsi and Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations at the time, Javad Zarif - and an internal review of the Lobbying Disclosure Act - offer evidence that the group has operated as an undeclared lobbyist and may be guilty of violating tax laws, the Foreign Agents Registration Act and lobbying disclosure laws."[4]
During the Obama administration, NIAC reached the height of its influence as it advocated in support ofthe Iran nuclear deal. The Congressional publication,The Hill, cited NIAC's work in support of the Iran nuclear accord as one of the "Top lobbying victories of 2015."[18]
In July 2019, NIAC was the target of sustained protests from members of the Iranian community with demonstrations in front of the NIAC office in Washington DC. They viewed NIAC as "the representative of the corrupt and brutalIslamic Republic regime" and not the voice ofthe Iranian-Americans.[19]
Iranians who were protesting forregime change believe that NIAC has not joined theWomen, Life, Freedom Movement and is still looking for a way to reform by trying to reestablish theJCPOA deal.[20]
It was also revealed in 2019 that theU.S. Department of State funded a group which attacked NIAC with thehashtag "#NIACLobbies4Mullahs".[21]
In January 2020, senatorsTom Cotton,Ted Cruz andMike Braun claimed that NIAC and its sister organization NIAC Action have violated theForeign Agents Registration Act (FARA) and they are "amplifying regime propaganda in the United States". They asked US Attorney GeneralWilliam Barr to "evaluate whether an investigation of NIAC is warranted for potential FARA violations and to ensure transparency regarding foreign attempts to influence the US political process."[22][23][24]
In 2022,Holly Dagres stated that "NIAC has become a slur that is synonymous with regime lobby/apologist to the point that Iranians inside Iran use it".[25]
In 2023, journalistEmily Schrader claimed her criticism of NIAC as one of the "foreign lobbying mouthpieces of the Islamic Republic" led to death threats and antisemitic comments.[26]
NIAC has a 100% rating fromCharity Navigator and a Platinum Seal of Transparency byGuidestar.[27][28] NIAC has over 8,000 donors including Iranian-American individuals and American foundations and does not receive funds from the Iranian government nor the United States government.[29][30][31] Their funders have included the Namazi family who funded NIAC while it pursued policies which would financially benefit the family.[32]
NIAC has been described as theIslamic Republic's lobby inWashington, DC.[14][22][1][4]
A NIAC report concluded that U.S. sanctions on Iran cost the U.S. economy between $135 billion and $175 billion in lost export revenue between 1995 and 2012.[33]
NIAC takes a negative view of economic sanctions against Iran and has opposed many proposals to sanction Iran and urged the repeal of sanctions it calls counterproductive.[34] The organization led campaigns to lift sanctions that blocked humanitarian organizations from providing disaster relief to Iranians, and helped remove sanctions on online communication tools like Facebook and YouTube.[35]
In 2015, the organization supported a Congressional letter (Dent-Price), which was signed by 131 Representatives, advocating giving negotiations with Iran on the nuclear issue a chance after the election of Iranian PresidentHassan Rouhani.[36]
the National Iranian American Council (NIAC)—an American-based organization widely viewed by many Iranians as a lobby entity for the Islamic Republic.
