| Nabataean Arabic | |
|---|---|
| Nabatean, Northern Arabian[1] | |
| Region | Levant,Sinai Peninsula and northwesternArabia |
| Era | 4th century BCE to 1st century CE |
| Nabataean | |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | None (mis) |
qhy-nor | |
| Glottolog | None |
Nabataean Arabic was the dialect ofArabic spoken by theNabataeans in antiquity.
In the first century AD, the Nabataeans wrote their inscriptions, such as the legal texts carved on the façades of the monumental tombs atMada'in Salih, ancient Ḥegrā, inNabataean Aramaic.
It is probable, however, that some or all of them, possibly in varying proportion depending on the region of theNabataean Kingdom where they lived, spoke Arabic.[2]
The termNabataean Arabic may also refer to the script that succeededNabataean Aramaic and precededPaleo-Arabic.[3]
| Labial | Dental | Denti-alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Pharyngeal | Glottal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| plain | lateral | ||||||||
| Nasal | [m] m⟨م⟩ | [n] n⟨ن⟩ | |||||||
| Stop | voiceless | [pʰ] p⟨ف⟩ | [tʰ] t⟨ت⟩ | [kʰ] k⟨ك⟩ | [ʔ] ʾ⟨ء⟩ | ||||
| voiced | [b] b⟨ب⟩ | [d] d⟨د⟩ | [g] g⟨ج⟩ | ||||||
| emphatic | [tʼ] ṭ⟨ط⟩ | [kʼ] q⟨ق⟩ | |||||||
| Fricative | voiceless | [θ] ṯ⟨ث⟩ | [s] s⟨س⟩ | [ɬ] s[a]⟨ش⟩ | [x] ẖ⟨خ⟩ | [ħ] ḥ⟨ح⟩ | [h] h⟨ه⟩ | ||
| voiced | [ð] ḏ⟨ذ⟩ | [z] z⟨ز⟩ | [ɣ] ġ⟨غ⟩ | [ʕ] ʿ⟨ع⟩ | |||||
| emphatic | [ðˤ] ẓ[b]⟨ظ⟩ | [sˁ] ṣ[a]⟨ص⟩ | [ɮˤ] ḍ[b]⟨ض⟩ | ||||||
| Rhotic | [r] r⟨ر⟩ | ||||||||
| Approximant | [l] l⟨ل⟩ | [j] y⟨ي⟩ | [w] w⟨و⟩ | ||||||
| Short | Long | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | Back | Front | Back | |
| Close | iː | uː | ||
| Mid | e | o | ||
| Open | a | æː | aː | |
In contrast with Old Hejazi and Classical Arabic, Nabataean Arabic may have undergone the shift[e] < *[i] and[o] < *[u], as evidenced by the numerous Greek transcriptions of Arabic from the area. This may have occurred in Safaitic as well, making it a possible Northern Old Arabic isogloss.
Nabataean א in دوسرا (dwsrʾ) does not signal[aː]; it would seem that *ay# collapsed to something like[æː]. Scribes must have felt that this sound was closer to א when the spelling conventions of Nabataean were fixed. In Greek transcription, this sound was felt to be closer to an e-class vowel, yielding Δουσαρης.[4]
| Triptote | Diptote | Dual | Plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masculine | Feminine | ||||
| Nominative | -un | -u | -āni | -ūna | -ātun |
| Accusative | -an | -a | -ayni | -īna | -ātin |
| Genitive | -in | ||||
Proto-Arabic nouns could take one of the five above declensions in their basic, unbound form. The definite article spread areally among the Central Semitic languages and it would seem that Proto-Arabic lacked any overt marking of definiteness.
| Triptote | Diptote | Dual | Plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masculine | Feminine | ||||
| Nominative | -u | -∅ | -ān | -ūn | -ātu |
| Accusative | -a | -ayn | -īn | -āti | |
| Genitive | -i | ||||
Final short vowels were lost, then nunation was lost, producing a new set of final short vowels. The definite article /ʾal-/ entered the language shortly after this stage.[6]
| Triptote | Diptote | Dual | Plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masculine | Feminine | ||||
| Nominative | (ʾal-)...-o | -∅ | *(ʾal-)...-ān | *(ʾal-)...-ūn | *(ʾal-)...-āto? |
| Accusative | (ʾal-)...-a | *(ʾal-)...-ayn | *(ʾal-)...-īn | *(ʾal-)...-āte? | |
| Genitive | (ʾal-)...-e | ||||
The ʿEn ʿAvdat inscription shows that final [n] had been deleted in undetermined triptotes, and that the final short vowels of the determined state were intact. The reconstructed text of the inscription is as follows:[7]
| Triptote | Diptote | Dual | Plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masculine | Feminine | ||||
| Nominative | (ʾal-)...-o | -∅ | ? | ? | ? |
| Accusative | |||||
| Genitive | |||||
In JSNab 17, All Arabic triptotes terminate inw regardless of their syntactic position or whether they are defined.