 Pair of visible-light and near-infrared photos from NASA'sHubble Space Telescope showing N6946-BH1 before and after it vanished from sight | |
| Observation data Epoch J2000.0 Equinox J2000.0 | |
|---|---|
| Constellation | Cygnus |
| Right ascension | 20h 35m 27.56s[1] |
| Declination | +60° 08′ 08.3″[1] |
| Apparent magnitude (V) | 18.17 (max)[2] |
| Characteristics | |
| Variable type | suspectedfailed supernova[2] |
| Astrometry | |
| Distance | 5,960,000[1] pc |
| Details | |
| Mass | 25[1] M☉ |
| Radius | 1,216[a]–2,720[b] R☉ |
| Luminosity | 200,000–~1,000,000[1] L☉ |
| Temperature | 3,500[1] K |
| Database references | |
| SIMBAD | data |
N6946-BH1 is a disappearing supergiant star andfailed supernova candidate formerly seen in the galaxyNGC 6946, on the northern border of theconstellation ofCygnus. The star, either ared supergiant[1] or ayellow hypergiant,[3] was 25 times the mass of the Sun, and was 20 million light years distant from Earth. In March through to May 2009 itsbolometric luminosity increased to at least a million solar luminosities, but by 2015 it had disappeared from optical view. In the mid andnear infrared an object is still visible; however, it is fading away with a brightness proportional to t−4/3. The brightening was insufficient to be asupernova;[1] the process that created the outburst is still uncertain.
The star's coordinates were at RA20h 35m 27.56s and Dec +60° 08′ 08.3″. The brightness of the star, given by its apparent magnitude in different colour bands on 2 July 2005 is given by R = 21, V = 22, B = 23, U = 24.[1] Prior to the optical outburst the star was about 100,000 times as bright as the Sun. After the outburst it was invisible in the visual band and has declined to 5,000 times as bright as the Sun in infrared radiation.[1]
.jpg)
One hypothesis is that of thefailed supernova. In this scenario, the core of the star collapsed to form ablack hole. The collapsing matter formed a burst ofneutrinos that lowered the total mass of the star by a fraction of a percent. This caused a shock wave that blasted out the star's envelope to make it brighter.[4] N6946-BH1 has supplied evidence contrary to the conventional idea that black holes are usually formed after a supernova, suggesting instead that a star may bypass this eventuality and yet collapse into a black hole.[5]
Observedtype II supernovae do not originate from stars with initial masses greater than about 18 M☉, and the rate of large star formation appears to exceed the rate of supernovae. The expectation is that something else is happening to these extra large stars. Failed supernovae and black hole formation is one proposed explanation.[1] If this event indeed reflected the formation of a black hole, it is the first time that black hole formation has been observed.[6]
Observations from theJames Webb Space Telescope show that all observations before it were a combination of at least three objects. The data the instrument collected matches that of a merger of two stars; however, the failed supernova hypothesis cannot be ruled out.[7]