Many conspicuous fungi such as thefly agaric (upper left) formectomycorrhiza (upper right) with tree rootlets.Arbuscular mycorrhiza (lower left) are very common in plants, including crop species such aswheat (lower right)
Introductory video animation providing some basic information about mycorrhizas.
A mycorrhiza is a symbiotic association between a green plant and a fungus. The plant makes organic molecules byphotosynthesis and supplies them to the fungus in the form of sugars or lipids, while the fungus supplies the plant with water and mineral nutrients, such asphosphorus, nitrogen, or zinc,[8] taken from the soil. Mycorrhizas are located in the roots of vascular plants, but mycorrhiza-like associations also occur inbryophytes[9] and there is fossil evidence that early land plants that lacked roots formed arbuscular mycorrhizal associations.[10] Most plant species form mycorrhizal associations, though some families likeBrassicaceae andChenopodiaceae cannot. Different forms for the association are detailed in the next section. The most common is thearbuscular type that is present in 70% of plant species, including many crop plants such as cereals and legumes.[11]
Fossil and genetic evidence indicate that mycorrhizae emerged as early as 450-500 million years ago, potentially between fungus-like protists and algae. Arbuscular mycorrhizal relationships appeared earliest, coinciding with theterrestrialization of plants.[12] Genetic evidence indicates that all land plants share a single common ancestor,[13] which appears to have quickly adopted mycorrhizal symbiosis, and research suggests that proto-mycorrhizal fungi were a key factor enabling plant terrestrialization.[14] There is a strong consensus among paleomycologists that mycorrhizal fungi served as a primitive root system for early terrestrial plants.[12] This is because, prior to plant colonization of land, soils were nutrient sparse and plants had yet to develop root systems. Without complex root systems, early terrestrial plants would have been incapable of absorbing recalcitrant ions from mineral substrates, such as phosphate, a key nutrient for plant growth.[15]
Fossils of Glomeromycotan spores and hyphae date to 460 million years ago, but the fossils were not associated with plants. The earliest terrestrial communities were similar to modernbiocrusts. Lichen-like associations between fungi and cyanobacteria were an important part of these communities. The first land plants were similar tomosses, with simple vascular systems and no leaves or roots.[16]
The earliest direct fossil evidence of early mycorrhizal symbiosis is found in the 407 million year oldRhynie chert, which contains an assemblage of "exceptionally preserved" fossil plants colonized by multiple para-mycorrhizal fungi.[10] The Rhynie chert fossils show Glomeromycotan and Mucoromycotan fungi engaged in mycorrhiza-like associations with cells of the plantsAglaophyton major andHorneophyton lignieri. The fossils suggest a mutualistic association between the plants and the colonizing fungi, because distinctive nutrient exchange structures (arbuscules and hyphal coils, in Glomeromycotina and Mucoromycotina respectively) are preserved and the colonized cells appear to have been alive at the time of infection by the fungus.[16]
These early associations are referred to as mycorrhiza-like or para-mycorrhizal because mycorrhiza are defined by the fungal colonization of plant roots, and early plants did not have any roots. The earliest fossils of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant roots originate from 315-303 million years ago, and show fungi belonging to Glomeromycotina in the root systems of a giant lycophyte,Lepidodendron, and an early relative of the conifers,Cordaites.[16] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were found in 240 million year old fossils ofAntarcticycas schopfii.
Ectomycorrhizae developed substantially later, during theJurassic period, while most other modern forms of mycorrhizal symbiosis, including orchid and ericoid mycorrhizae, date to the period ofangiosperm radiation in theCretaceous period.[17] Ectomycorrhizae appear in the fossil record 48.7 million years ago, in the Eocene, with a fossil of ectomycorrhizal fungi colonizingPinus roots.[18] However, it is believed that the first ectomycorrhizal relationships evolved in the stem groupPinaceae around the radiation of the Pinaceae crown group in the mid Jurassic, 175 million or so years ago.[18]
Fossils preservation ofEricoid mycorrhizae and orchid mycorrhizae is lacking. Calibrated molecular phylogeny is used to estimate when these mycorrhizal types originated.[18] The origins of orchid mycorrhizae are unclear, though orchids themselves are thought to have originated in the Cretaceous period. Ericoid mycorrhizae are estimated to have the most recent evolutionary origins of mycorrhizal types, evolving around 118 million years ago from free-living saprotrophic ancestors.[19] Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi evolved from multiple lineages of fungi, primarily ascomycetes from theLeotiomycetes, as well as basidiomycetes from the familySerendipitaceae.[20]
In plants, the genes for forming mycorrhizal symbiosis are highly conserved and originate from a common ancestor, meaning that the ability to form mycorrhizae is ancestral to all land plants.[21] Non-mycorrhizal plant lineages, such as the Brassicaceae, lost the ability to form mycorrhizae at some point in their evolution.[22] The earliest mycorrhizae were arbuscular mycorrhizae, and other forms, such as ectomycorrhizae and orchid mycorrhizae, evolved when plant hosts switched from symbiosis withGlomeromycotina to symbiosis with different fungal lineages.[23]
There is genetic evidence that the symbiosis betweenlegumes andnitrogen-fixing bacteria is derived from mycorrhizal symbiosis.[24] The modern distribution of mycorrhizal fungi appears to reflect an increasing complexity and competition in root morphology associated with the dominance of angiosperms in theCenozoic Era, characterized by complex ecological dynamics between species.[25]
In fungi, mycorrhizal symbiosis had multiple independent origins among different lineages of fungi. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi form their own monophyletic phylum, whereas other mycorrhizal fungi convergently evolved similar lifestyles.
The phylumGlomeromycota, which forms the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, is the oldest mycorrhizal lineage. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis evolved only once in fungi; all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi belong to Glomeromycota and share a common ancestor.[19] 244 species have been identified based on differences in the appearance of their spores, but genetic studies suggest that 300-1600 species may exist in Glomeromycota.[21] All members of Glomeromycota are obligate biotrophs, entirely dependent upon their plant hosts for survival.[26] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are considered to be generalists, with minimal host plant specificity. AM symbiosis has been observed in almost every seed plant taxonomic division, or around 67% of species.[15] Arbuscular mycorrhizae take on most angiosperms, some gymnosperms, pteridophytes, and nonvascular plants as plant hosts.[27] Arbuscular mycorrhizae have been observed in the seedling stage of otherwise ectomycorrhizal partners, suggesting that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi may be able to infect almost any land plant given proper circumstances.[28]
Other forms of mycorrhizal symbiosis, such as ectomycorrhizae, orchid mycorrhizae, and ericoid mycorrhizae, emerged multiple times in different lineages of fungi throughconvergent evolution. Unlike arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, some of these fungi are only facultatively symbiotic, and can live by themselves without a plant host under some conditions.
Ectomycorrhizal fungi evolved from free-living saprotrophs, mostly inBasidiomycota andAscomycota, and some became dependent on plant hosts when they lost genes necessary for decaying lignin and other plant materials.[21] There are 20,000 to 25,000 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi, but only 6,000 to 7,000 plant species that form ectomycorrhizal symbiosis.[29] In angiosperms, it is believed that ectomycorrhizal partnerships have developed independently at least 18 times, and in fungi, around 80 times.[18][19] The main evolutionary driver for ectomycorrhizae is switching of nutritional modes from saprotrophs.[30] Phylogenomic analysis of various ectomycorrhizal fungal genomes has confirmed the convergent evolution of ectomycorrhizal fungi from white and brown-rot fungi, as well as from soil saprotrophs.[30][28] Some lineages of ectomycorrhizae have likely evolved from endophytic ancestors, fungi that live within plants without damaging them.[30] Some ectomycorrhizal fungi have gone through apparent evolutionary reversal back into saprotrophic ecology. This is possible because some lineages of ectomycorrhizal fungi retain enzymes for breaking downlignin.[31]
Orchid mycorrhizal fungi, which mostly originate from Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, are less understood. Some fungi that participate in orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis can also form ectomycorrhizal symbiosis with other plants, or live independently of a plant host. Some orchid mycorrhizal fungi can also live as plant pathogens.[23][21]
Ericoid mycorrhizal associations have the most recent origins and the lowest species richness among both plant and fungal partners.[19] This specialization suggests that ericoid mycorrhizal partners evolved in parallel with one another in response to environmental change, rather than through reciprocal species-to-species level selection.[32] Ericoid mycorrhizal relationships are found in extremely nutrient poor soils in the northern and southern hemispheres.[31] These environments of low mineral nutrient availability have led to native plants developing sclerophylly, where plants become high in lignin and low in phosphorus and nitrogen.[31] As a result, decaying plant matter in these areas has an abnormally high carbon to nitrogen ratio, making it resistant to microbial decay. Ericoid mycorrhizae have apparently evolved to conserve minerals in nutrient deficient sclerophyllous litter by directly cycling these nutrients throughout the mycorrhiza system.[31] Ericoid mycorrhizae also retain saprotrophic abilities, allowing them to extract nitrogen and phosphorus from unmineralized organic material, and resist negative outcomes from high concentrations of toxic cations in the acidic soil environment.[31]
The mycorrhizal lifestyle has independentlyconvergently evolved multiple times in the history of Earth.[33] There are multiple ways to categorize mycorrhizal symbiosis. The largest division is betweenectomycorrhizas andendomycorrhizas. The two types are differentiated by the fact that the hyphae of ectomycorrhizal fungi do not penetrate individualcells within the root, while thehyphae of endomycorrhizal fungi penetrate the cell wall andinvaginate thecell membrane.[34][35]
Some forms of plant-fungal symbiosis are similar to mycorrhizae, but considered distinct. One example is fungal endophytes. Endophytes are defined as organisms that can live within plant cells without causing harm to the plant. They are distinguishable from mycorrhizal fungi by the absence of nutrient-transferring structures for bringing in nutrients from outside the plant.[33] Some lineages of mycorrhizal fungi may have evolved from endophytes into mycorrhizal fungi,[36] and some fungi can live as mycorrhizae or as endophytes.
Ectomycorrhizae are distinct in that they do not penetrate into plant cells, but instead form a structure called aHartig net that penetrates between cells.[37] Ectomycorrhizas consist of a hyphal sheath, or mantle, covering the root tip and the Hartig net of hyphae surrounding the plant cells within the rootcortex. In some cases the hyphae may also penetrate the plant cells, in which case the mycorrhiza is called an endomycorrhiza. Outside the root,ectomycorrhizal extramatrical mycelium forms an extensive network within the soil andleaf litter. Other forms of mycorrhizae, including arbuscular, ericoid, arbutoid, monotropoid, and orchid mycorrhizas, are considered endomycorrhizae.[38]
Ectomycorrhizas, or EcM, are symbiotic associations between the roots of around 10% of plant families, mostly woody plants including thebirch,dipterocarp,eucalyptus,oak,pine, androse[39] families,orchids,[40] and fungi belonging to theBasidiomycota,Ascomycota, andZygomycota. Ectomycorrhizae associate with relatively few plant species, only about 2% of plant species on Earth, but the species they associate with are mostly trees and woody plants that are highly dominant in their ecosystems, meaning plants in ectomycorrhizal relationships make up a large proportion of plant biomass.[41] Some EcM fungi, such as manyLeccinum andSuillus, are symbiotic with only one particular genus of plant, while other fungi, such as theAmanita, are generalists that form mycorrhizas with many different plants.[42] An individual tree may have 15 or more different fungal EcM partners at one time.[43] While the diversity of plants involved in EcM is low, the diversity of fungi involved in EcM is high. Thousands of ectomycorrhizal fungal species exist, hosted in over 200 genera. A recent study has conservatively estimated global ectomycorrhizal fungal species richness at approximately 7750 species, although, on the basis of estimates of knowns and unknowns in macromycete diversity, a final estimate of ECM species richness would probably be between 20,000 and 25,000.[44] Ectomycorrhizal fungi evolved independently from saprotrophic ancestors many times in the group's history.[45]
Nutrients can be shown to move between different plants through the fungal network. Carbon has been shown to move frompaper birch seedlings into adjacentDouglas-fir seedlings, although not conclusively through a common mycorrhizal network,[46] thereby promotingsuccession inecosystems.[47] The ectomycorrhizal fungusLaccaria bicolor has been found to lure and killspringtails to obtain nitrogen, some of which may then be transferred to the mycorrhizal host plant. In a study by Klironomos and Hart,Eastern White Pine inoculated withL. bicolor was able to derive up to 25% of its nitrogen from springtails.[48][49] When compared with non-mycorrhizal fine roots, ectomycorrhizae may contain very high concentrations of trace elements, including toxic metals (cadmium, silver) or chlorine.[50]
The first genomic sequence for a representative of symbiotic fungi, the ectomycorrhizal basidiomyceteL. bicolor, was published in 2008.[51] An expansion of several multigene families occurred in this fungus, suggesting that adaptation to symbiosis proceeded by gene duplication. Within lineage-specific genes those coding for symbiosis-regulated secreted proteins showed an up-regulated expression in ectomycorrhizal root tips suggesting a role in the partner communication.L. bicolor is lacking enzymes involved in the degradation of plant cell wall components (cellulose, hemicellulose, pectins and pectates), preventing the symbiont from degrading host cells during the root colonisation. By contrast,L. bicolor possesses expanded multigene families associated with hydrolysis of bacterial and microfauna polysaccharides and proteins. This genome analysis revealed the dualsaprotrophic andbiotrophic lifestyle of the mycorrhizal fungus that enables it to grow within both soil and living plant roots. Since then, the genomes of many other ectomycorrhizal fungal species have been sequenced further expanding the study of gene families and evolution in these organisms.[52]
This type of mycorrhiza involves plants of the Ericaceae subfamilyArbutoideae. It is however different from ericoid mycorrhiza and resembles ectomycorrhiza, both functionally and in terms of the fungi involved.[53] It differs from ectomycorrhiza in that some hyphae actually penetrate into the root cells, making this type of mycorrhiza anectendomycorrhiza.[54]
Arbuscular mycorrhizas, (formerly known as vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas), have hyphae that penetrate plant cells, producing branching, tree-like structures called arbuscules within the plant cells for nutrient exchange. Often, balloon-like storage structures, termed vesicles, are also produced. In this interaction, fungalhyphae do not in fact penetrate theprotoplast (i.e. the interior of the cell), but invaginate thecell membrane, creating a so-called peri-arbuscular membrane. The structure of the arbuscules greatly increases the contact surface area between the hypha and the host cellcytoplasm to facilitate the transfer of nutrients between them. Arbuscular mycorrhizas are obligate biotrophs, meaning that they depend upon the plant host for both growth and reproduction; they have lost the ability to sustain themselves by decomposing dead plant material.[55] Twenty percent of the photosynthetic products made by the plant host are consumed by the fungi, the transfer of carbon from the terrestrial host plant is then exchanged by equal amounts of phosphate from the fungi to the plant host.[56]
Contrasting with the pattern seen in ectomycorrhizae, the species diversity of AMFs is very low, but the diversity of plant hosts is very high; an estimated 78% of all plant species associate with AMFs.[41] Arbuscular mycorrhizas are formed only by fungi in thedivisionGlomeromycota. Fossil evidence[10] and DNA sequence analysis[57] suggest that this mutualism appeared400-460 million years ago, when the first plants were colonizing land. Arbuscular mycorrhizas are found in 85% of all plant families, and occur in many crop species.[39] The hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi produce the glycoproteinglomalin, which may be one of the major stores of carbon in the soil.[58] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have (possibly) been asexual for many millions of years and, unusually, individuals can contain many genetically different nuclei (a phenomenon calledheterokaryosis).[59]
Mycorrhizal fungi belonging toMucoromycotina, known as "fine root endophytes" (MFREs), were mistakenly identified as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi until recently. While similar to AMF, MFREs are from subphylum Mucoromycotina instead of Glomeromycotina. Their morphology when colonizing a plant root is very similar to AMF, but they form fine textured hyphae.[37] Effects of MFREs may have been mistakenly attributed to AMFs due to confusion between the two, complicated by the fact that AMFs and MFREs often colonize the same hosts simultaneously. Unlike AMFs, they appear capable of surviving without a host. This group of mycorrhizal fungi is little understood, but appears to prefer wet, acidic soils and forms symbiotic relationships with liverworts, hornworts, lycophytes, and angiosperms.[60]
Ericoid mycorrhizae, or ErMs, involve only plants inEricales and are the most recently evolved of the major mycorrhizal relationships. Plants that form ericoid mycorrhizae are mostly woody understory shrubs; hosts include blueberries, bilberries, cranberries, mountain laurels, rhododendrons, heather, neinei, and giant grass tree. ErMs are most common inboreal forests, but are found in two-thirds of all forests on Earth.[41] Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi belong to several different lineages of fungi. Some species can live as endophytes entirely within plant cells even within plants outside the Ericales, or live independently as saprotrophs that decompose dead organic matter. This ability to switch between multiple lifestyle types makes ericoid mycorrhizal fungi very adaptable.[33]
Plants that participate in these symbioses have specialized roots with no root hairs, which are covered with a layer of epidermal cells that the fungus penetrates into and completely occupies.[37] The fungi have a simple intraradical (growth in cells) phase, consisting of dense coils of hyphae in the outermost layer of root cells. There is no periradical phase and the extraradical phase consists of sparse hyphae that don't extend very far into the surrounding soil. They might form sporocarps (probably in the form of small cups), but their reproductive biology is poorly understood.[35]
Plants participating in ericoid mycorrhizal symbioses are found in acidic, nutrient-poor conditions.[33] Whereas AMFs have lost theirsaprotrophic capabilities, and EcM fungi have significant variation in their ability to produce enzymes needed for a saprotrophic lifestyle,[41] fungi involved in ErMs have fully retained the ability to decompose plant material for sustenance. Some ericoid mycorrhizal fungi have actually expanded their repertoire of enzymes for breaking down organic matter. They can extract nitrogen from cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectin, and chitin. This would increase the benefit they can provide to their plant symbiotic partners.[62]
Allorchids aremyco-heterotrophic at some stage during their lifecycle, meaning that they can survive only if they formorchid mycorrhizae. Orchid seeds are so small that they contain no nutrition to sustain the germinating seedling, and instead must gain the energy to grow from their fungal symbiont.[37] The OM relationship is asymmetric; the plant seems to benefit more than the fungus, and some orchids are entirely mycoheterotrophic, lacking chlorophyll for photosynthesis. It is actually unknown whether fully autotrophic orchids that do not receive some of their carbon from fungi exist or not.[63] Like fungi that form ErMs, OM fungi can sometimes live as endophytes or as independent saprotrophs. In the OM symbiosis, hyphae penetrate into the root cells and form pelotons (coils) for nutrient exchange.
Nutrient exchanges and communication between a mycorrhizal fungus and plants.
Mycorrhizal fungi form amutualistic relationship with the roots of most plant species. In such a relationship, both the plants themselves and those parts of the roots that host the fungi, are said to be mycorrhizal. Relatively few of the mycorrhizal relationships between plant species and fungi have been examined to date, but 95% of the plant families investigated are predominantly mycorrhizal either in the sense that most of their species associate beneficially with mycorrhizae, or are absolutely dependent on mycorrhizae. TheOrchidaceae are notorious as a family in which the absence of the correct mycorrhizae is fatal even to germinating seeds.[64]
Recent research intoectomycorrhizal plants inboreal forests has indicated that mycorrhizal fungi and plants have a relationship that may be more complex than simply mutualistic. This relationship was noted when mycorrhizal fungi were unexpectedly found to be hoarding nitrogen from plant roots in times of nitrogen scarcity. Researchers argue that some mycorrhizae distribute nutrients based upon the environment with surrounding plants and other mycorrhizae. They go on to explain how this updated model could explain why mycorrhizae do not alleviate plant nitrogen limitation, and why plants can switch abruptly from a mixed strategy with both mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal roots to a purely mycorrhizal strategy as soil nitrogen availability declines.[65] It has also been suggested that evolutionary and phylogenetic relationships can explain much more variation in the strength of mycorrhizal mutualisms than ecological factors.[66]
Within mycorrhiza, the plant gives carbohydrates (products of photosynthesis) to the fungus, while the fungus gives the plant water and minerals.
To successfully engage in mutualistic symbiotic relationships withother organisms, such as mycorrhizal fungi and any of the thousands of microbes that colonize plants, plants must discriminate between mutualists and pathogens, allowing the mutualists to colonize while activating animmune response towards the pathogens. Plant genomes code for potentially hundreds ofreceptors for detecting chemical signals from other organisms. Plants dynamically adjust their symbiotic and immune responses, changing their interactions with their symbionts in response to feedbacks detected by the plant.[67] In plants, the mycorrhizal symbiosis is regulated by thecommon symbiosis signaling pathway (CSSP), a set of genes involved in initiating and maintaining colonization by endosymbiotic fungi and other endosymbionts such asRhizobia inlegumes. The CSSP has origins predating the colonization of land by plants, demonstrating that the co-evolution of plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is over 500 million years old.[45] In arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, the presence ofstrigolactones, a plant hormone, secreted from roots induces fungal spores in the soil to germinate, stimulates their metabolism, growth and branching, and prompts the fungi to release chemical signals the plant can detect.[68] Once the plant and fungus recognize one another as suitable symbionts, the plant activates the common symbiotic signaling pathway, which causes changes in the root tissues that enable the fungus to colonize.[69]
Experiments with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have identified numerous chemical compounds to be involved in the "chemical dialog" that occurs between the prospective symbionts before symbiosis is begun. In plants, almost all plant hormones play a role in initiating or regulating AMF symbiosis, and other chemical compounds are also suspected to have a signaling function. While the signals emitted by the fungi are less understood, it has been shown that chitinaceous molecules known as Myc factors are essential for the formation of arbuscular mycorrhizae. Signals from plants are detected by LysM-containing receptor-like kinases, or LysM-RLKs. AMF genomes also code for potentially hundreds of effector proteins, of which only a few have a proven effect on mycorrhizal symbiosis, but many others likely have a function in communication with plant hosts as well.[68]
Many factors are involved in the initiation of mycorrhizal symbiosis, but particularly influential is the plant's need forphosphorus. Experiments involvingrice plants with a mutation disabling their ability to detect P starvation show that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi detection, recruitment and colonization is prompted when the plant detects that it is starved of phosphorus.[60] Nitrogen starvation also plays a role in initiating AMF symbiosis.[68]
The mechanisms by which mycorrhizae increase absorption include some that are physical and some that are chemical. Physically, most mycorrhizal mycelia are much smaller in diameter than the smallest root or root hair, and thus can explore soil material that roots and root hairs cannot reach, and provide a larger surface area for absorption. Chemically, the cell membrane chemistry of fungi differs from that of plants. For example, they may secreteorganic acids that dissolve orchelate many ions, or release them from minerals byion exchange.[70] Mycorrhizae are especially beneficial for the plant partner in nutrient-poor soils.[71]
In this mutualism, fungal hyphae (E) increase the surface area of the root and uptake of key nutrients while the plant supplies the fungi with fixed carbon (A=root cortex, B=root epidermis, C=arbuscle, D=vesicle, F=root hair, G=nuclei).
The mycorrhizal mutualistic association provides the fungus with relatively constant and direct access tocarbohydrates, such asglucose andsucrose.[72] The carbohydrates are translocated from their source (usually leaves) to root tissue and on to the plant's fungal partners. In return, the plant gains the benefits of themycelium's higher absorptive capacity for water and mineral nutrients, partly because of the large surface area of fungal hyphae, which are much longer and finer than plantroot hairs, and partly because some such fungi can mobilize soil minerals unavailable to the plants' roots. The effect is thus to improve the plant's mineral absorption capabilities.[73]
Unaided plant roots may be unable to take upnutrients that are chemically or physicallyimmobilised; examples includephosphateions andmicronutrients such as iron. One form of such immobilization occurs in soil with highclay content, or soils with a stronglybasic pH. Themycelium of the mycorrhizal fungus can, however, access many such nutrient sources, and make them available to the plants they colonize.[74] Thus, many plants are able to obtain phosphate without using soil as a source. Another form of immobilisation is when nutrients are locked up in organic matter that is slow to decay, such as wood, and some mycorrhizal fungi act directly as decay organisms, mobilising the nutrients and passing some onto the host plants; for example, in somedystrophic forests, large amounts of phosphate and other nutrients are taken up by mycorrhizalhyphae acting directly onleaf litter, bypassing the need for soil uptake.[75]Inga alley cropping, anagroforestry technique proposed as an alternative toslash and burn rainforest destruction,[76] relies upon mycorrhiza within the root system of species ofInga to prevent the rain from washingphosphorus out of the soil.[77]
In some more complex relationships, mycorrhizal fungi do not just collect immobilised soil nutrients, but connect individual plants together bymycorrhizal networks that transport water, carbon, and other nutrients directly from plant to plant through underground hyphal networks.[78]
Suillus tomentosus, abasidiomycete fungus, produces specialized structures known as tuberculate ectomycorrhizae with its plant hostlodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var.latifolia). These structures have been shown to hostnitrogen fixingbacteria which contribute a significant amount ofnitrogen and allow the pines to colonize nutrient-poor sites.[79]
Disease, drought and salinity resistance and its correlation to mycorrhizae
Mycorrhizal plants are often more resistant to diseases, such as those caused by microbial soil-bornepathogens. These associations have been found to assist in plant defense both above and belowground. Mycorrhizas have been found to excrete enzymes that are toxic to soil borne organisms such as nematodes.[80] More recent studies have shown that mycorrhizal associations result in a priming effect of plants that essentially acts as a primary immune response. When this association is formed a defense response is activated similarly to the response that occurs when the plant is under attack. As a result of this inoculation, defense responses are stronger in plants with mycorrhizal associations.[81]Ecosystem services provided by mycorrhizal fungi may depend on the soil microbiome.[82] Furthermore, mycorrhizal fungi was significantly correlated with soil physical variable, but only with water level and not with aggregate stability[83][84] and can lead also to more resistant to the effects of drought.[85][86][87] Moreover, the significance of mycorrhizal fungi also includes alleviation of salt stress and its beneficial effects on plant growth and productivity. Although salinity can negatively affect mycorrhizal fungi, many reports show improved growth and performance of mycorrhizal plants under salt stress conditions.[88]
Plants connected by mycorrhizal fungi inmycorrhizal networks can use these underground connections to communicate warning signals.[89][90] For example, when a host plant is attacked by anaphid, the plant signals surrounding connected plants of its condition. Both the host plant and those connected to it releasevolatile organic compounds that repel aphids and attractparasitoid wasps, predators of aphids.[89] This assists the mycorrhizal fungi by conserving its food supply.[89]
Plants grown in sterilesoils and growth media often perform poorly without the addition ofspores or hyphae of mycorrhizal fungi to colonise the plant roots and aid in the uptake of soil mineral nutrients.[91] The absence of mycorrhizal fungi can also slow plant growth in early succession or on degraded landscapes.[92] The introduction of alien mycorrhizal plants to nutrient-deficient ecosystems puts indigenous non-mycorrhizal plants at a competitive disadvantage.[93] This aptitude to colonize barren soil is defined by the categoryOligotroph.
Fungi have a protective role for plants rooted in soils with high metal concentrations, such asacidic andcontaminated soils.Pine trees inoculated withPisolithus tinctorius planted in several contaminated sites displayed high tolerance to the prevailing contaminant, survivorship and growth.[94] One study discovered the existence ofSuillus luteus strains with varying tolerance ofzinc. Another study discovered that zinc-tolerant strains ofSuillus bovinus conferred resistance to plants ofPinus sylvestris. This was probably due to binding of the metal to the extramatricialmycelium of the fungus, without affecting the exchange of beneficial substances.[93]
Mycorrhizas are present in 92% of plant families studied (80% of species),[39] witharbuscular mycorrhizas being the ancestral and predominant form,[39] and the most prevalent symbiotic association found in the plant kingdom.[72] The structure of arbuscular mycorrhizas has been highly conserved since their first appearance in the fossil record,[10] with both the development of ectomycorrhizas and the loss of mycorrhizas,evolving convergently on multiple occasions.[39]
Associations of fungi with the roots of plants have been known since at least the mid-19th century. However, early observers simply recorded the fact without investigating the relationships between the two organisms.[95] This symbiosis was studied and described byFranciszek Kamieński in 1879–1882.[96][97]
CO2 released by human activities is causingclimate change and possible damage to mycorrhizae, but the direct effect of an increase in the gas should be to benefit plants and mycorrhizae.[98] In Arctic regions, nitrogen and water are harder for plants to obtain, making mycorrhizae crucial to plant growth.[99] Since mycorrhizae tend to do better in cooler temperatures, warming could be detrimental to them.[100] Gases such as SO2, NOx, and O3 produced by human activity may harm mycorrhizae, causing reduction in "propagules, the colonization of roots, degradation in connections between trees, reduction in the mycorrhizal incidence in trees, and reduction in theenzyme activity of ectomycorrhizal roots."[101]
A company inIsrael, Groundwork BioAg, has discovered a method of using mycorrhizal fungi to increase agricultural crops while sequestering greenhouse gases and eliminating CO2 from the atmosphere.[102]
In 2021, theSociety for the Protection of Underground Networks was launched. SPUN is a science-based initiative to map and protect the mycorrhizal networks regulating Earth's climate and ecosystems. Its stated goals are mapping, protecting, and harnessing mycorrhizal fungi.
^Kirk, P. M.; Cannon, P. F.; David, J. C.; Stalpers, J. (2001).Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi (9th ed.). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
^Read, D.J. (2013). "Mycorrhiza- the state of the art". In Varma, Ajit; Hock, Bertold (eds.).Mycorrhiza: Structure, Function, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 3–5.ISBN978-3662037799.
^Brundrett, Marc C (2004). "Diversity and classification of mycorrhizal associations".Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.79 (3):473–95.doi:10.1017/S1464793103006316."A new definition of mycorrhizas that encompasses all types of these associations while excluding other plant-fungus interactions is provided. This definition recognises the importance of nutrient transfer at an interface resulting from synchronised plant-fungus development."
^abcdWard, Elisabeth B.; Duguid, Marlyse C.; Kuebbing, Sara E.; Lendemer, James C.; Bradford, Mark A. (2022). "The functional role of ericoid mycorrhizal plants and fungi on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forests".New Phytologist.235 (5):1701–1718.Bibcode:2022NewPh.235.1701W.doi:10.1111/nph.18307.PMID35704030.
^Perotto, Silvia; Daghino, Stefania; Martino, Elena (2018). "Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi and their genomes: another side to the mycorrhizal symbiosis?".New Phytologist.220 (4):1141–1147.Bibcode:2018NewPh.220.1141P.doi:10.1111/nph.15218.PMID29851103.
^abcdvan der Heijden, Marcel G. A.; Martin, Francis M.; Selosse, Marc-Andre; Sanders, Ian R. (2015). "Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future".New Phytologist.205 (4):1406–1423.Bibcode:2015NewPh.205.1406V.doi:10.1111/nph.13288.
^Vigneron, Nicolas; Radhakrishnan, Guru V; Delaux, Pierre-Marc (2018). "What have we learnt from studying the evolution of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis?".Current Opinion in Plant Biology.44:49–56.Bibcode:2018COPB...44...49V.doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2018.02.004.PMID29510317.
^abPerotto, Silva; Balestrini, Raffaella (2023). "At the core of the endomycorrhizal symbioses: intracellular fungal structures in orchid and arbuscular mycorrhiza".New Phytologist.242 (4):1408–1416.doi:10.1111/nph.19338.PMID37884478.
^Provorov, N. A.; Shtark, O. Yu; Dolgikh, E. A. (2016). "[Evolution of nitrogen-fixing symbioses based on the migration of bacteria from mycorrhizal fungi and soil into the plant tissues]".Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii.77 (5):329–345.PMID30024143.
^Voller, Fay; Ardanuy, Agnes; Taylor, Andy F.S.; Johnson, David (2023). "Maintenance of host specialisation gradients in ectomycorrhizal symbionts".New Phytologist.242 (4):1426–1435.doi:10.1111/nph.19395.PMID37984824.
^abcdWard, Elisabeth B.; Duguid, Marlyse C.; Kuebbing, Sara E.; Lendemer, James C.; Bradford, Mark A. (2022). "The functional role of ericoid mycorrhizal plants and fungi on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forests".New Phytologist.235 (5):1701–1718.Bibcode:2022NewPh.235.1701W.doi:10.1111/nph.18307.PMID35704030.
^abMartin, Francis M.; van der Heijden, Marcel G. A. (2024). "The mycorrhizal symbiosis: research frontiers in genomics, ecology, and agricultural application".New Phytologist.242 (4):1486–1506.Bibcode:2024NewPh.242.1486M.doi:10.1111/nph.19541.PMID38297461.
^Cejpková, J.; Gryndler, M.; Hršelová, H.; Kotrba, P.; Řanda, Z.; Greňová, I.; Borovička, J. (2016). "Bioaccumulation of heavy metals, metalloids, and chlorine in ectomycorrhizae from smelter-polluted area".Environmental Pollution.218:176–185.Bibcode:2016EPoll.218..176C.doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.009.PMID27569718.
^Simon, L.; Bousquet, J.; Lévesque, R. C.; Lalonde, M. (1993). "Origin and diversification of endomycorrhizal fungi and coincidence with vascular land plants".Nature.363 (6424):67–69.Bibcode:1993Natur.363...67S.doi:10.1038/363067a0.S2CID4319766.
^abProut, James N.; Williams, Alex; Wanke, Alan; Schornack, Sebastian; Ton, Jurriaan; Field, Katie J. (2023). "Mucoromycotina 'fine root endophytes': a new molecular model for plant–fungal mutualisms?".Trends in Plant Science.29 (6).PMID38102045.
^Midgley, DJ; Chambers, SM; Cairney, J. W. G. (2002). "Spatial distribution of fungal endophyte genotypes in a Woollsia pungens (Ericaceae) root system".Australian Journal of Botany.50 (5):559–565.Bibcode:2002AuJB...50..559M.doi:10.1071/BT02020.
^Trappe, J. M. (1987). "Phylogenetic and ecologic aspects of mycotrophy in the angiosperms from an evolutionary standpoint". In Safir, G. R. (ed.).Ecophysiology of VA Mycorrhizal Plants. Florida: CRC Press.
^Thoms, David; Liang, Yan; Haney, Cara H. (2021). "Maintaining Symbiotic Homeostasis: How Do Plants Engage With Beneficial Microorganisms While at the Same Time Restricting Pathogens?".International Society for Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions.34 (5).
^Hogan, C.M. (2011)."Phosphate". In Jorgensen, A.; Cleveland, C.J. (eds.).Encyclopedia of Earth. Washington DC: National Council for Science and the Environment. Archived fromthe original on 2012-10-25.
^Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Barea, J. M. (29 October 1996). "Arbuscular mycorrhizas and biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens – an overview of the mechanisms involved".Mycorrhiza.6 (6):457–464.doi:10.1007/s005720050147.S2CID25190159.
^Zeng, Ren-Sen (2006). "Disease Resistance in Plants Through Mycorrhizal Fungi Induced Allelochemicals".Allelochemicals: Biological Control of Plant Pathogens and Diseases. Disease Management of Fruits and Vegetables. Vol. 2. pp. 181–192.doi:10.1007/1-4020-4447-X_10.ISBN1-4020-4445-3.
^Nikolaou, N.; Angelopoulos, K.; Karagiannidis, N. (2003). "Effects of Drought Stress on Mycorrhizal and Non-Mycorrhizal Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine, Grafted Onto Various Rootstocks".Experimental Agriculture.39 (3):241–252.doi:10.1017/S001447970300125X.S2CID84997899.
^Kamieński, Franciszek (1882). "Les organes végétatifs deMonotropa hypopitys L."" [The vegetative organs ofMonotropa hypopitys L.].Mémoires de la Société nat. Des Sciences naturelles et mathém. De Cherbourg (in French).3 (24)..Berch, S. M.; Massicotte, H. B.; Tackaberry, L. E. (July 2005). "Re-publication of a translation of 'The vegetative organs of Monotropa hypopitys L.' published by F. Kamienski in 1882, with an update on Monotropa mycorrhizas".Mycorrhiza.15 (5):323–32.Bibcode:2005Mycor..15..323B.doi:10.1007/s00572-004-0334-1.PMID15549481.S2CID3162281.
^Kamieński, Franciszek (1885)."Über die auf Wurzelsymbiose beruhende Ernährung gewisser Bäume durch unterirdische Pilze" [On the nourishing, via root symbiosis, of certain trees by underground fungi].Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft (in German).3:128–145. From p. 129:"Der ganze Körper ist also weder Baumwurzel noch Pilz allein, sondern ähnlich wie der Thallus der Flechten, eine Vereinigung zweier verschiedener Wesen zu einem einheitlichen morphologischen Organ, welches vielleicht passend alsPilzwurzel,Mycorhiza bezeichnet werden kann." (The whole body is thus neither tree root nor fungus alone, but similar to the thallus of lichens, a union of two different organisms into a single morphological organ, which can be aptly designated as a "fungus root", amycorrhiza.)
^Monz, C. A.; Hunt, H. W.; Reeves, F. B.; Elliott, E. T. (1994). "The response of mycorrhizal colonization to elevated CO2 and climate change in Pascopyrum smithii and Bouteloua gracilis".Plant and Soil.165 (1):75–80.Bibcode:1994PlSoi.165...75M.doi:10.1007/bf00009964.S2CID34893610.
^Hobbie, John E.; Hobbie, Erik A.; Drossman, Howard; et al. (2009). "Mycorrhizal fungi supply nitrogen to host plants in Arctic tundra and boreal forests: 15N is the key signal".Canadian Journal of Microbiology.55 (1):84–94.doi:10.1139/w08-127.hdl:1912/2902.PMID19190704.
^Xavier, L. J.; Germida, J. J. (1999). "Impact of human activities on mycorrhizae".Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology.
.jpg)
