This articlecontainstoo many or overly lengthy quotations. Please helpsummarise the quotations. Consider transferring direct quotations toWikiquote or excerpts toWikisource.(April 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Geographical range | Levant |
|---|---|
| Period | Epipaleolithic |
| Dates | c. 14,000 – c. 12,500 BP[1] |
| Type site | Wadi Mushabi |
| Preceded by | Kebaran |
| Followed by | Natufian culture |
| TheMesolithic |
|---|
| ↑Upper Paleolithic |
| Europe |
| Epipalaeolithic Near East |
| Caucasus |
| Zagros |
| ↓Neolithic |
TheMushabian culture (alternately,Mushabi orMushabaean) is anarchaeological culture suggested to have originated among theIberomaurusians inNorth Africa, though once thought to have originated in the Levant.[2][3]
The culture is named afterWadi Mushabi and probably derives from theNizzanim culture of theNegev.[4]
According to Bar-Yosef andEmmanuel Anati, theNatufian culture had arisen as a result of the mixing of the localKebarian culture of the Levant with the Mushabi culture.


According toOfer Bar-Yosef :
"A contemporary desertic entity was labeled "Mushabian," and was considered to be, on the basis of the technotypological features of its lithics, of North African origin. The fieldwork done in recent years in northern Sinai and the Negev has shown that the forms of the Mushabian microliths (mainly curved and arched backed bladelets) and the intensive use of the microburin technique was a trait foreign to previous Levantine industries, but instead is closer to the Iberomaurusian."[5]
According to Thomas Levy:
"The Mushabian is commonly considered to have originated in North Africa, largely on the basis of habitual of the microburin technique and general morphological similarities with some assemblages in Nubia(Phillips and Mintz 1977; Bar-Yosef and Vogel 1987."[2]
According to Eric Delson:
"A different industry, the Mushabian, is marked by steeply arched microliths and the frequent use of the microburin technique. The Mushabian is found exclusively in the arid interior southern Levant (e.g., Sinai), suggesting it could represent an arid-land adaptation. Some researchers have noted stylistic continuities between the Mushabian and the Ibero-Maurusian of North Africa, suggesting the Mushabian may represent a migration of African groups into the southern Levant."[3]
According to Deborah Olszewski:
According toNigel Goring-Morris: