Municipal socialism is atype of socialism that useslocal government to furthersocialist aims. It is a form ofmunicipalism in which its explicitly socialist aims are clearly stated. In some contexts the word "municipalism" was tainted with the concept ofprovincialism. However, when it was adopted by various socialist networks in the late nineteenth century, this approach to socialist transformation spread across Europe and North America.[1] Following electoral success in a number of localities, by the early twentieth century discussion of municipal socialism took on a more practical character, asEdgard Milhaud, Professor of Political Economy at theUniversity of Geneva.[2] establishedAnnales de la Régie Directe, an academic journal which set out to scientifically examine the initial steps towards transforming areas previously dominated byprivate enterprise into new forms ofpublic service.[1] This journal contributed to a growing network of municipal socialists in Europe and North America, in which three types of movements were united at a local level:trade unions particularly of municipally run public services such as gas, transport, sewage etc., consumer and industrial co-operatives, and other associations of consumers including tenants groups opposed to price and rent increases.[1]
There have been several historical and contemporary movements that aim to use local government to develop socialism.
Municipal socialism has been used to describe public ownership of streetcar lines, waterworks, and other local utilities, as was favored by "Progressives" in the United States in the late 1890s/early 1900s.[3] The termSewer Socialism was also used to describe the pragmatic reformist policies ofEmil Seidel,Daniel Hoan andFrank Zeidler,Milwaukee's threeSocialist mayors in the 20th century.
A chapter on municipal socialism appears inClass in America: an Encyclopedia:
The heyday of municipal socialism is generally considered to have been from 1901 to 1917. [...] In 1911 there were seventy-three Cities with socialist mayors, and over 1,200 other socialist elected officials across the nation.[4]
The termmunicipal socialism has been used to describe the local government-ledsocial reform developed in the United Kingdom. This includes the reforms initiated byJoseph Chamberlain asmayor ofBirmingham between 1873 and 1875. These reforms included rendering gas and water supplies public services, controlled by the government,clearing slums and the introduction of a city park system.[5] Chamberlain's approach was also described as "gas and water socialism".[6] Chamberlain's reforms were influential onBeatrice Webb, one of the leaders of theFabian movement.[citation needed]
Beatrice Webb's husband,Sidney Webb, wrote inSocialism in England, published in the 1890s:
It is not only in matters of sanitation that this 'Municipal Socialism' is progressing. Nearly half the consumers of the Kingdom already consume gas made by themselves as citizens collectively, in 168 different localities, as many as 14 local authorities obtained the power to borrow money to engage in the gas industry in a single year. Water supply is rapidly coming to be universally a matter of public provision, no fewer than 71 separate governing bodies obtaining loans for this purpose in the year 1885-86 alone. The prevailing tendency is for the municipalities to absorb also the tramway industry, 31 localities already owning their own lines, comprising a quarter of the mileage in the Kingdom.[7]
The Fabians were influential in theLondon County Council andLondon School Board, as well as in some other local authorities, through the newly formedLabour Party. A more radical expression of the municipal socialist movement wasPoplarism inPoplar, east London, led byGeorge Lansbury.[8]
More recently, the term refers to attempts in the 1980s in British cities byleft-wing figures in the British Labour Party to resist the curtailment of local government powers byMargaret Thatcher'sright-wingConservative central government during therate-capping rebellion. This movement was also known as "local socialism" or the "new urban left".[9] Examples of such local authorities included theGreater London Council under "Red"Ken Livingstone,Lambeth council under "Red"Ted Knight andLinda Bellos,Liverpool council underDerek Hatton andSheffield council (sometimes referred to as "thePeople's Republic of South Yorkshire") underDavid Blunkett. These authorities were often derided as "loony left" by Conservative supportingtabloid newspapers.[10]
Recently, some media outlets have identified a resurgence of municipal socialism in places likePreston.[11] TheNew Statesman has also called the policies of the town "new municipalism" and "community wealth building" alongside that of municipal socialism.[12] BothThe Economist andNew Statesman tie the projects toJeremy Corbyn's leadership of theLabour Party.[11][12]
There have been several examples ofmunicipal socialism in Australian history, a belief that was most popular in the state ofQueensland. In theCity of Townsville, thelibertarian socialist Alderman Ned Lowry led a municipal socialist movement in the 1890s, which advocated for the "municipal ownership of gas, tram and other industries".[13] Although Lowry died in 1897, the movement was picked up by the Townsville newspaperDemocrat. In the neighbouringCity of Maryborough, the municipal socialist movement advocated for the municipalisation of "water, lighting, transport, abbatoirs, markets, washhouses, and the conveyance of coffins to cemeteries [sic?]".[13]
TheCommunist Party of Australia held a majority of seats in the New South Wales'Kearsley Shire from 1944 to 1947.[14] The Shire was committed to municipal socialism, advocating nationalisation of electricity and the expansion of thesocial wage, and was unique for its commitment to activism around federal and international affairs.[14] The council notably rejected visits from theGovernor of New South Wales, and criticised Britain for not supporting theGreek People's Liberation Army.[14]
Between 1918 and 1934, theSocial Democratic Party of Austria had near-total control over the Viennese local government during a period known asRed Vienna. During their rule, the SDAP passed new labor laws and expanded access to public housing, sanitation, and childcare services in the city.
Vladimir Lenin was sharply critical of municipal socialism when the idea was taken up by RussianMensheviks in the early twentieth century:
Thebourgeoisintelligentsia ofthe West, like the English Fabians, elevate municipal socialism to a special “trend” precisely because it dreams of social peace, of class conciliation, and seeks to divert public attention away from the fundamental questions of the economic system as a whole, and of the state structure as a whole, to minor questions of local self-government. In the sphere of questions in the first category, the class antagonisms stand out most sharply; that is the sphere which, as we have shown, affects the very foundations of the class rule of the bourgeoisie. Hence it is in that sphere that thephilistine,reactionaryutopia of bringing about socialism piecemeal is particularly hopeless.[15]
SubsequentLeninist groups pursued this critique of municipal socialism in its 1980s incarnation. TheRevolutionary Communist Group wrote:
"Municipal socialism" became an avenue that Labour used to retain the allegiance of the newlabour aristocracy from thepublic sector. Many jobs and ‘non-jobs’ were given to this already privileged layer as the left feathered its own nest. Spurious community groups, housing schemes,race relations andethnic minority units for tiny privileged layers of black and Irish people were set up and paid for. They were all designed to foster the interests of those who found jobs and funding through them, with little benefit to those who were really suffering the onslaught ofThatcherism. Even when "municipal socialism" took on a popular and widely supported position, its limitations were quickly exposed. TheFare's Fair dispute of 1982 showed this at an early stage, after theLaw Lords overruled an attempt to introduce cheap fares on London transport, and Ken Livingstone's Greater London Council did not make a serious fight of it. In reality, Thatcher destroyed "municipal socialism" by continually restricting local democracy and the rights of local authorities to raise and spend money.[16]
