Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Multi-speed Europe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Political idea

This article is part ofa series on
Other bodies
European Investment Bank Group

European Stability Mechanism

European University Institute

Unified Patent Court


Other independent bodies


Inter-institutional bodies


Foreign relations of EU member states



flagEuropean Union portal
For broader coverage of this topic, seeMulti-speed integration.

Multi-speed Europe ortwo-speed Europe (called alsovariable geometry Europe orcore Europe depending on the form it would take in practice) is the idea that different parts of theEuropean Union shouldintegrate at different levels and pace depending on the political situation in each individual country. Indeed, multi-speed Europe is currently a reality, with only a subset of EU countries being members of theeurozone and of theSchengen area. Like other forms ofdifferentiatedintegration such asà la carte andvariable geometry, "multi-speed Europe" arguably aims to salvage the "widening and deepening of the European Union" in the face ofpolitical opposition.

Reasons and actuality of the concept

[edit]

The concept entered political discourse when, after the end of the Cold War, an eastward enlargement of the European Union began to materialise and the question arose how "widening" could be made compatible with "deepening",[1] i.e., how the imminent enlargement process could be prevented from diluting the idea of an "ever closer union among the peoples of Europe", as the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community of 1957 had put it. In 1994 – still at a time of theEU12 – the GermanChristian DemocratsWolfgang Schäuble andKarl Lamers published a document[2] in which they called for aKerneuropa (= core Europe). This idea envisaged that "core Europe" would have a "centripetal effect", a magnetic attraction for the rest of Europe. A precursor to that concept had been a proposal by two advisors to German ChancellorHelmut Kohl,Michael Mertes and Norbert J. Prill, published as early as July 1989. Mertes and Prill called for aconcentric circles Europe, built around a federal core consisting of theInner Six (EU6) and like-minded EU member states.[3] In 1994 they partly revoked their original idea, arguing that the post-Cold War EU would rather look like a "Europe of Olympic rings" than a "Europe of concentric circles".[4]

Themulti-speed Europe concept has been debated for years in European political circles, as a way to solve some institutional issues. The concept is that the more members there are in the Union, the more difficult it becomes to reach consensus on various topics, and the less likely it is that all would advance at the same pace in various fields.

TheInner Six alongside the Outer Seven from 1960 to 1972
  Inner Six (EEC)
  Outer Seven (EFTA)

Intermediate forms could be limited to some areas of close cooperation, as some historical examples are given below. It is also possible now for a minimum of nine EU member states to useenhanced co-operation, but this new framework has been used only once. A second proposal, a unified European patent, is nearing completion [as of December 2010] with only two countries (Italy and Spain) not participating.[5]

The idea of a multi-speed Europe has been revived because of the following initiatives:

Furthermore, important events were:

AnEuler diagram showing the relationships between various multinational European organisations and agreements

Currently in the EU there are the following cases of non-uniform application of theEuropean Union law:

permanent deviations[a]request by states to cooperate more than EU
(post-accession: request to participate at EU level instead of less)
request by states to cooperate less than general EU level
allowed by the EUEnhanced co-operationOpt-outs in the European Union
MinorEU law derogations or exemptions
special territories status
not allowed by the EUMechanism for Cooperation and Verification
Eurozone/Schengen suspensions
(post accession: benchmarks for adoption of EU level)

Overview of non-uniformity inside the EU

[edit]

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, and Slovenia participate in all EU provisions.

ParticipantEuropean Union AgreementsEnhanced cooperationPESCOOpen method of coordinationRelated Intergovernmental treatiesSymbols
SchengenAFSJCFREuroPatentDivorceInt. couples' propertyEPPOEuro+SRMESMPrüm
BulgariaBulgariaxxxcxxxxxxxoxx
CroatiaCroatiaxxxxooxxxoxxoo
CyprusCypruscxxxxoxxxxxxox
Czech RepublicCzech Republicxxxcxoxxxoxooo
DenmarkDenmarkxoxoxoooxxcooo
EstoniaEstoniaxxxxxxoxxxxxxo
FinlandFinlandxxxxxoxxxxxxxo
GreeceGreecexxxxxxxxxxxxcx
HungaryHungaryxxxcxxooxoxoxx
Republic of IrelandIrelandooxxxoooxxxxoo
ItalyItalyxxxxxxxxxxxxcx
LatviaLatviaxxxxxxoxxxxxoo
LithuaniaLithuaniaxxxxxxoxxxxxox
MaltaMaltaxxxxxxxxoxxxox
NetherlandsNetherlandsxxxxxoxxxxxxxo
PolandPolandxxocxooxxxcooo
PortugalPortugalxxxxxxxxxxxxcx
RomaniaRomaniaxxxcxxoxxxxoxx
SlovakiaSlovakiaxxxxxooxxxxxxx
SpainSpainxxxxoxxxxxxxxx
SwedenSwedenxxxcxoxxxoooco
  •  x  – Member
  •  c  – Candidate (or conditions to be fulfilled before joining)
  •  o  – Non-member

Membership in European Union agreements

[edit]
  EU, Schengen, EMU, AFSJ (All agreements): 18 c.
  EU, Schengen, AFSJ: 6 c.
  EU, EMU, AFSJ: 1 c.
  EU, Schengen: 1 c.
  EU, EMU: 1 c.
  EEA, Schengen: 3 c.
  Schengen, Bilateral treaties: 1 c.
  Candidates, some agreements: 9 c.
  Microstates, some agreements: 4 c.
  Association Agreement: 1 c.
  some agreements: 0 c.

A small group of EU member states have joined all European treaties, instead of opting out on some. They drive the development of a federal model for the European integration. This is linked to the concept of Multi-speed Europe where some countries would create a core union; and goes back to theInner Six references to the founding member states of theEuropean Communities.

At present, the formation of a formal Core Europe Federation ("a federation within the confederation") has been held off at every occasion where such a federation treaty had been discussed.[citation needed] Instead, supranational institutions are created that govern more areas in "Inner Europe" than existing European integration provides for.

Among the 27 EU state members, 18 states have signed all integration agreements: Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Finland, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain. The agreements considered include the fifth stage of economic integration orEMU, theSchengen agreement, and theArea of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ).

Thus, among the 27 EU countries, 20 have joined the Eurozone, 25 have joined Schengen, and also 25 have no opt-outs under AFSJ.

Further, some countries which do not belong to the EU have joined several of these initiatives, albeit sometimes at a lower stage such as theCustoms Union, theCommon Market (EEA), or even unilaterally adopting the euro, and by taking part inSchengen, either as a signatory state, orde facto.

Thus, 6 non-EU countries have adopted the euro (4 through an agreement with the EU and 2 unilaterally), and 4 non-EU states have joined the Schengen agreement officially.

The following table shows the status of each state membership to the different agreements promoted by the EU. It lists 47 countries, including the 27 EU member states, 9 candidate states, 3 members of theEEA and Switzerland, Kosovo which has applied for membership, 4 microstates, and the United Kingdom and Armenia as special cases.

Hence, this table summarises some components of EU laws applied in most European states. Some territories of EU member states also have aspecial status in regard to EU laws applied. Some territories of EFTA member states also have aspecial status in regard to EU laws applied as is the case with someEuropean microstates. For member states that do not have special-status territories the EU law applies fully with the exception of theopt-outs in the European Union andstates under a safeguard clause or alternatively some states participate inenhanced co-operation between a subset of the EU members. Additionally, there are various examples of non-participation by some EU members and non-EU states participation in particularAgencies of the European Union, the programmes forEuropean Higher Education Area,European Research Area andErasmus Mundus.

European Union Agreements
StateMapEUEEACustoms UnionSchengenEMU (Euro)AFSJ
Austria AustriaYesYesYesYesYesYes
Belgium BelgiumYesYesYesYesYesYes
Croatia CroatiaYesYesYesYesYesYes
Estonia EstoniaYesYesYesYesYesYes
Finland FinlandYesYesYesYesYesYes
France FranceYesYesYesYesYesYes
Germany GermanyYes[7]YesYesYesYesYes
Greece GreeceYesYesYesYesYesYes
Italy ItalyYesYesYesYesYesYes
Latvia LatviaYesYesYesYesYesYes
Lithuania LithuaniaYesYesYesYesYesYes
Luxembourg LuxembourgYesYesYesYesYesYes
Malta MaltaYesYesYesYesYesYes
Netherlands NetherlandsYesYesYesYesYesYes
Portugal PortugalYesYesYesYesYesYes
Slovakia SlovakiaYesYesYesYesYesYes
Slovenia SloveniaYesYesYesYesYesYes
Spain SpainYesYesYesYesYesYes
Bulgaria BulgariaYesYesYesYesERM IIYes
Czech Republic Czech RepublicYesYesYesYesObliged to joinYes
Hungary HungaryYesYesYesYesObliged to joinYes
Poland PolandYesYesYesYesObliged to joinCFR partial opt-out
Romania RomaniaYesYesYesYesObliged to joinYes
Sweden SwedenYesYesYesYesObliged to joinYes
Cyprus CyprusYesYesYesObliged to joinYesYes
Denmark DenmarkYesYesYesYesOpt-out,ERM IIOpt-out
Republic of Ireland IrelandYesYesYesOpt-out,Visa FreeYesOpt-out (Opt-in)
Liechtenstein LiechtensteinNoYesNo (Swiss-Liecht CU)YesNoNo
Norway NorwayApplications withdrawn[8]YesNoYesNoNo
Iceland IcelandApplications withdrawn[9]YesNoYesNoNo
Switzerland SwitzerlandApplication withdrawn[10]Bilateral treaties[11]No (Swiss-Liecht CU)YesNoNo
Albania AlbaniaCandidateNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeNoNo
Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and HerzegovinaCandidateNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeNoNo
Georgia (country) GeorgiaCandidateNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeNoNo
Moldova MoldovaCandidateNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeNoNo
Montenegro MontenegroCandidateNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeUnilaterally adoptedNo
North Macedonia North MacedoniaCandidateNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeNoNo
Serbia SerbiaCandidateNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeNoNo
Turkey TurkeyCandidateNoCustoms Union[Note 1]NoNoNo
Ukraine UkraineCandidateNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeNoNo
Andorra AndorraNoNoCustoms Union[Note 1]No,Visa FreeYes[Note 2]No
Monaco MonacoNoNode facto, with Francede facto, with FranceYes[Note 2]No
San Marino San MarinoNoNoCustoms Union[Note 1]Open borderYes[Note 2]No
Vatican City Vatican CityNoNoNoOpen borderYes[Note 2]No
Kosovo KosovoApplicant, SAA signedNo,EC,ECAANoNo,Visa FreeUnilaterally adoptedNo
Armenia ArmeniaNo (CEPA signed)No,EC,ECAANoNoNoNo
United Kingdom United KingdomNo (withdrew)No (withdrew)NoNo,Visa FreeNoNo

Notes:

  1. ^abcIn a customs union with the EU.[12][13][14][15]
  2. ^abcdFormalagreement with the EU to issue euros.

Participation of European countries in non EU-only integration initiatives

[edit]
For integration activities not initiated by the EU, seeEuropean integration.
icon
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Multi-speed Europe" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(January 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A number of countries have special relations to the European Union implementing many of its regulations. Prominently there are Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and Liechtenstein which are the only remaining EFTA members while all other former EFTA members have converted into EU members. Through agreements Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein (not including Switzerland) are members of theEuropean Economic Area since 1994. As a consequence of taking part in the EU single market they need to adopt part of theLaw of the European Union. Formally they would not need to fund the EU government[citation needed] but in practice they have opted to take on their part of financing EU institutions as required by EU law (seeEEA and Norway Grants) with the financial footprint of Norway being equal to that of an EU member since 2009.[citation needed] Especially Norway and Iceland are known to forfeit EU membership on the basis ofEU fishery regulations that they want to opt out on. Both Norway and Iceland have signed and implemented the Schengen zone agreements from the start. During the turmoils of the financial crisis, Iceland was looking into membership of the Eurozone and it did apply for EU membership in 2009. Norway has joined all EU political treaties[vague] and it has applied to EU membership multiple times but while fulfilling the requirements the membership was rejected by referendums in 1972 and 1994. This leaves Norway to be integrated into Inner Europe's institutions while not being part their governing body.

ParticipantEUOSCECoESchengenEuroEUCUEEAEnergy CommunityECTECAAEEAEMCDDAEMSAEASAERAEDAESAPrümNATO
AlbaniaAlbaniac[b]xxxxxx
AndorraAndorraxxssx
ArmeniaArmeniaxxoxx
AustriaAustriaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
AzerbaijanAzerbaijanxxx
BelarusBelarusxx
BelgiumBelgiumxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovinacxxxxx
BulgariaBulgariaxxxxcxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CroatiaCroatiaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxox
CyprusCyprusxxxcxxxxxxxxxxxxo
Czech RepublicCzech Republicxxxxcxxxxxxxxxxxxox
DenmarkDenmarkxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxox
EstoniaEstoniaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FinlandFinlandxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FranceFrancexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Georgia (country)Georgiacxxxxx
GermanyGermanyxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GreeceGreecexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcx
HungaryHungaryxxxxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IcelandIcelandxxxxxxxxxxx
Republic of IrelandIrelandxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxo
ItalyItalyxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcx
KazakhstanKazakhstanxx
KosovoKosovoc[c]x[d]xx
LatviaLatviaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxox
LiechtensteinLiechtensteinxxxxxxxx
LithuaniaLithuaniaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxox
LuxembourgLuxembourgxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MaltaMaltaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxo
MoldovaMoldovacxxxxx
MonacoMonacoxxssx
MontenegroMontenegroc[b]xxx[d]xxxx
NetherlandsNetherlandsxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
North MacedoniaNorth Macedoniac[b]xxxxxx
NorwayNorwayxxxxoxxxxxxxxx
PolandPolandxxxxcxxxxxxxxxxxox
PortugalPortugalxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcx
RomaniaRomaniaxxxxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
RussiaRussiax
San MarinoSan Marinoxxssx
SerbiaSerbiac[b]xxxx
SlovakiaSlovakiaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SloveniaSloveniaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SpainSpainxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SwedenSwedenxxxxcxxxxxxxxxxxxcx
SwitzerlandSwitzerlandxxxxxxxx
TurkeyTurkeyc[e]xxxoxxxx
UkraineUkrainecxxxxx
United KingdomUnited Kingdomxxxxx
Vatican CityVatican Cityxos

x – member
c – conditions to be fulfilled before joining
s – unilateral adoption/participation through another state who is a member/some instruments signed, but not yet ratified
o – observer

Post-Brexit-vote revival of "multispeed Europe" ideas

[edit]
This section needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(June 2022)

In March 2017,European CommissionpresidentJean-Claude Juncker released a five-point view of possible courses for the EC and its to-be-27 post-Brexit members, looking forward to the year 2025. The points, among which Juncker expressed no preference, "range from standing down from policing of government financing of companies, for example, to a broader pullback that would essentially strip the EU back to being merely a single market", per one report.The updated possibilities would entail member countries or groups of countries adopting different levels of participation with the union. The EC was approaching a March meeting of the 27 members in Rome and Juncker's paper addressed the options that "once invited scorn from convincedEurophiles" and seemed maybe even to have some backing "of lifelongfederalists" like the president.[16]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^In addition to the permanent deviations there are temporary transition periods for the application of certain EU law provisions in some member states, but these have an already set dates for lapsing.
  2. ^abcdEU candidate negotiating
  3. ^EU applicant
  4. ^abDe facto uses the euro.
  5. ^EU candidate negotiations frozen

References

[edit]
  1. ^Marcin Zaborowski: Germany and EU Enlargement: From Rapprochement to "Reaproachment"? In: Helene Sjursen (Ed.),Enlargement in perspective, ARENA Report February 2005, p. 46.
  2. ^Karl Lamers / Wolfgang Schäuble:Überlegungen zur europäischen Politik (Reflections on European Policy). See also Gilles Andréani:What future for federalism?, Centre for European Reform Essays, September 2002,ISBN 1-901229-33-5, p. 7-8.
  3. ^Michael Mertes / Norbert J. Prill: Der verhängnisvolle Irrtum eines Entweder-Oder. Eine Vision für Europa,Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 19 July 1989.
  4. ^Michael Mertes / Norbert J. Prill: Es wächst zusammen, was zusammengehören will. "Maastricht Zwei" muss die Europäische Union flexibel machen,Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 9 December 1994, p. 11.
  5. ^"Countries press ahead with limited single EU patent plan"Archived 30 December 2010 at theWayback Machine,out-law.com, 17 December 2010.
  6. ^'Coalitions for the willing'Archived 6 February 2007 at theWayback Machine,The Economist, 1 February 2007.
  7. ^3 October 1990 for East Germany
  8. ^accession suspended (1962 and 1967). Then rejected in two referendums (1972 and 1994)
  9. ^"Iceland withdraws EU accession bid | News | DW.COM | 12.03.2015". Dw.de.Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved6 January 2016.
  10. ^"Retrait de la demande d'adhesion de la Suisse a l'UE"(PDF).Swiss Federal Council. 27 July 2016. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 22 October 2016. Retrieved13 September 2016.
  11. ^"Trade – Switzerland".European Commission.Archived from the original on 25 March 2013. Retrieved15 September 2012.
  12. ^"Andorra : Customs Unions and preferential arrangements".European Commission. Archived fromthe original on 26 October 2012. Retrieved12 September 2012.
  13. ^"San Marino : Customs Unions and preferential arrangements".European Commission. Archived fromthe original on 26 October 2012. Retrieved12 September 2012.
  14. ^"Trade : Turkey".European Commission.Archived from the original on 2 March 2009. Retrieved12 September 2012.
  15. ^"Turkey : Customs Unions and preferential arrangements".European Commission. Archived fromthe original on 30 July 2012. Retrieved12 September 2012.
  16. ^Valentine Pop,"Once Scorned, ‘Multispeed Europe’ Is Back" (subscription)Archived 2 March 2017 at theWayback Machine,The Wall Street Journal, 1 March 2017. Retrieved 2017-03-01.

External links

[edit]
European Union articles
History
Timeline
Predecessors
Defence policy
European Communities (1967–2009)
Central bank
Financial stability
Enlargements
Withdrawals
Geography
Bodies
Institutions
Legislature
Executive
Judiciary
Central bank
Supreme audit institution
Other
international-law
EU bodies
Independent
offices
Agencies
Advisory
bodies
Military
bodies
Law
Economy
Politics
Concepts
Policies
Foreign
relations
Culture
Lists
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Multi-speed_Europe&oldid=1294779126"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp