Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Motu proprio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromMotu Proprio)
Type of document issued by the Pope

Scale of justice
Part ofa series on the
Canon law of the Catholic Church
Jus antiquum (c. 33–1140)
Jus novum (c. 1140–1563)
Jus novissimum (c. 1563–1918)
Jus codicis (1918-present)
Other
Sacraments
Sacramentals
Sacred places
Sacred times
Supreme authority,particular churches, and canonical structures
Supreme authority of the Church
Supra-diocesan/eparchal structures
Particular churches
Juridic persons
Procedural law
Pars statica (tribunals & ministers/parties)
Pars dynamica (trial procedure)
Canonization
Election of the Roman Pontiff
iconCatholicism portal

In law,motu proprio (Latin for 'on his own impulse') describes an official act taken without a formal request from anotherparty. Some jurisdictions use the termsua sponte for the same concept.

InCatholic canon law, it refers to a document issued by thepope on his own initiative and personally signed by him.[1] Such a document may be addressed to the whole church, to part of it, or to some individuals.[1] The first papalmotu proprio waspromulgated byPope Innocent VIII in 1484.[2] It continues to be a common form ofpapal rescript, especially when establishing institutions, making minor changes to law or procedure, and when granting favours to persons or institutions.

Catholic Church

[edit]

Effect

[edit]

An important effect of issuing a document in this way is that a rescript containing the clausemotu proprio is valid and produces its effect even in cases where fraud would ordinarily have vitiated the document, since the pope does not rely on the reasons alleged when he grants a favour.[2] Withholding of the truth in what, according to canonical law, style and practice, must for validity be expressed, normally renders a rescript invalid, but not if the rescript is issuedmotu proprio.[3] Consequently, canonists traditionally called the clause the "mother of repose".[2] The designationmotu proprio indicates that the validity of the document is independent of the validity of whatever reasons may have been adduced in a request for its issuance.[2]

However, amotu proprio has no effect in so far as it harms the acquired right of another or is contrary to a law[4] or approved custom, unless it expressly states that it is derogating from these matters.[5]

Form

[edit]

Amotu proprio rescript begins by giving the reasons for issuing it, and then indicates the law or regulation made or the favour granted. It is less formal than a constitution and carries no papal seal. Its content may be instructional (e.g., on the use ofchant), administrative (e.g., concerning a church law or the establishment of a commission), or merely to confer a special favour.[6]

Civil law

[edit]
icon
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Motu proprio" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(October 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

More generically, this phrase (orproprio motu; Latin allowsfree word order) is used to indicate an act taken by a court without amotion from a party to the case. The term is used very rarely in legal opinions in the United States, wheresua sponte is preferred, butproprio motu is used in Canada.[7]Proprio motu is used to refer to a decision by the prosecutor of theInternational Criminal Court to initiate an investigation into a situation without a referral from theSecurity Council or a state party; this power is granted by article 15(1) of theRome Statute.European Court of Justice judgments use the phrase "of its own motion" and its equivalent in other communitylanguages.[8]

As it relates to a monarch, the termmotu proprio describes the condition of a royal decree being made expressly on the sovereign's initiative, a practice more usual in some nations than in others.

Relating toorders of chivalry, like theOrder of Malta, thegrand master according to the statutes can confer the ordermotu proprio, instead of in response to a nomination by a national delegation.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abOxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (Oxford University Press 2005ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3), s.v. motu proprio
  2. ^abcd"Catholic Encyclopedia: Motu Proprio".newadvent.org.
  3. ^"Code of Canon Law: text – IntraText CT".intratext.com.
  4. ^According to the article in the 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia, amotu proprio was at that time considered valid even if counter to ecclesiastical law.
  5. ^"Code of Canon Law: text – IntraText CT".intratext.com.
  6. ^"Motu proprio".Britannica. Retrieved9 September 2023.
  7. ^Dickson J. (28 March 2025)."R v. Erven"(PDF).Supreme Court of Canada. p. 8.[1979] 1 S.C.R. 926.where the Crown attempts to tender a statement without first requesting a trial within the trial, the Court must order it proprio motu.
  8. ^European Court of Justice,Joined Cases C-222/05 to C-225/05, delivered 7 June 2007, accessed 30 June 2023
History
Timeline
Ecclesiastical
Legal
Early Church
Great Church
Middle Ages
Modern era
Theology
Bible
Tradition
Catechism
General
Ecclesiology
Sacraments
Mariology
Philosophy
Saints
Organisation
Hierarchy
Canon law
Laity
Precedence
By country
Holy See
(List of popes)
Vatican City
Polity
(Holy orders)
Consecrated life
Particular churches
sui iuris
Catholic liturgy
Culture
Media
Religious orders,
institutes,societies
Associations
of the faithful
Charities

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in thepublic domainHerbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Motu Proprio".Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Motu_proprio&oldid=1290586069"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp