| Moti Masjid (Red Fort) | |
|---|---|
| Religion | |
| Affiliation | Islam(former) |
| Ecclesiastical or organizational status | Mosque(former) |
| Status | Inactive; (preserved) |
| Location | |
| Location | Old Delhi,Central Delhi |
| Country | India |
Location of the mosque inCentral Delhi | |
| Administration | Archaeological Survey of India |
| Geographic coordinates | 28°39′25″N77°14′35″E / 28.656815°N 77.243142°E /28.656815; 77.243142 |
| Architecture | |
| Type | Mosque architecture |
| Style | Mughal |
| Founder | Aurangzeb |
| Completed | 1663; 362 years ago (1663) |
| Construction cost | 1lakh and 60 thousandrupees |
| Specifications | |
| Dome | Three |
| Site area | 9 by 15 m (30 by 49 ft) |
| Materials | White marble;red sandstone;gilded copper(since removed) |
TheMoti Masjid (lit. 'Pearl mosque'[1]) is a 17th-century historicalmosque, not open for worship, inside theRed Fort complex inOld Delhi,India. It was built byMughal emperorAurangzeb, damaged during theSiege of Delhi, and subsequently restored by theBritish. Named for its white marble,[2] the mosque features ornate floral carvings. It is an important example ofMughal architecture during Aurangzeb's reign.
The Moti Masjid was commissioned by Mughal emperor Aurangzeb, shortly after his accession. The purpose was to provide the emperor a mosque for prayer closer to his private chambers within the Red Fort. At the time, the fort did not contain a mosque; the fort's builder and previous occupant, emperorShah Jahan, instead offered congregational prayers at the nearbyJama Masjid.[3] Construction of the Moti Masjid took five years, completing in 1663 CE, at Aurangzeb's personal expense; the court chronicleMa'asir-i-Alamgiri describes the cost to be 1 lakh and 60 thousandrupees.[3][4][5] Following its construction, Aurangzeb began to offer thezuhr prayer at the mosque with officials of the state, introducing a new ceremonial practice.[5]
In 1857, British soldiers looted the Red Fort, following its capture in theSiege of Delhi. The Moti Masjid in particular had its gilded copper domes stripped byPrize Agents[a] and sold at auction. The looting exposed the domes to the elements, caused them to deteriorate, and rainwater also damaged the ceiling of the prayer hall.[6]: 41, 49 The mosque domes were later replaced by the British in white marble.[3][2]
In the 1920s, initiatives by the ASI led to a swelling of tourism at the Red Fort, and the Moti Masjid experienced increased foot traffic. This caused rules and regulations to be put in place so as to have visitors comply with Islamic conduct. In the post-Revolt era, the ASI also raised concerns over British military personnel damaging the marble floors of the mosque.[6]: 52, 107 In the modern era, the ASI has closed the mosque to visitors, to avoid damage to the structure.[7]
The Moti Masjid consists of a prayer hall and courtyard, contained in a walled enclosure. The site is small, internally measuring 9 by 15 metres (30 by 49 ft). The compound is raised slightly above ground level and entered from the east, accessed by a staircase. The enclosure walls are made of red sandstone, and are of notable height, obstructing the view of the structures within. The walls also vary in thickness, compensating for the mosque's orientation - the exterior walls align with the axes of the Red Fort, while the interior walls are aligned towardsMecca. The courtyard of the mosque is rectangular, and contains a recessed pool.[3][8][2]
Set at the end of the courtyard is the prayer hall, a three-bayed structure divided into two aisles. The structure also has corridors for use by the ladies of the court. Thefaçade of the prayer hall features three entrance arches onpiers, as well as a curvilinear eave (banglachhajja). The mosque building is topped by three pointed domes, sitting on constricted necks, aligned with the arches in the façade.[3][8] The prayer hall's marble floor is demarcated into rectangles, possibly to mark positions for worshippers.[2]
The Moti Masjid most closely resembles theNagina Masjid, another small-scale palace mosque, built by Aurangzeb's predecessor Shah Jahan in theAgra Fort. ScholarEbba Koch goes as far as to call it a near-literal copy.[4] Both monuments have a similar plan, elevation, and building material (white marble). However, the Moti Masjid departs from the Nagina Masjid, in its extensive use of ornamentation. Unlike the Nagina Masjid, whose surfaces are plain, the Moti Masjid features a program of ornate floral decoration, executed as marblereliefs andinlays. These are found on the mosque's walls, arches, piers, andpendentives. Particularly notable are themihrab (prayer niche) of the mosque, which features vine motifs, and theminbar (pulpit), sculpted as anacanthus vine supporting three steps. Such ornamentation stems from the palace architecture of Shah Jahan, reflected in several pavilions of the Red Fort. This is notably contrasted with the religious buildings of Shah Jahan's reign, which were more austere in nature. Dadlani views this as an innovation of Aurangzeb's reign, which also appears on his later imperial mosques. The Moti Masjid is also innovative in what Asher terms its 'spatial tension', achieved by the height of its enclosure walls and its domes; this spatial tension would become a feature of architecture during Aurangzeb's reign.[9][3][4]
Koch noted that the ostentatious design of the mosque stands in contrast to Aurangzeb's reputation of artistic austerity. She argues that this indicates the emperor's lack of direct involvement in the stylism of the project.[4] On the other hand, Dadlani views the monument as part of Aurangzeb's 'imperial visual program', which emphasized the construction of mosques to portray himself as a pious ruler, but also used ornamentation to recall Shah Jahan's reign, and thereby its political stability.[10]