Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Morgoth's Ring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Volume of 'The History of Middle-earth'

Morgoth's Ring
EditorChristopher Tolkien
AuthorJ. R. R. Tolkien
LanguageEnglish
SeriesThe History of Middle-earth
SubjectTolkien's legendarium
GenreHigh fantasy
Literary analysis
PublisherHarperCollins (UK)
Publication date
1993
Media typePrint (hardback and paperback)
Pages496 (paperback)
ISBN978-0261103009
Preceded byThe History of The Lord of the Rings 
Followed byThe War of the Jewels 

Morgoth's Ring (1993) is the tenth volume ofChristopher Tolkien's 12-volume seriesThe History of Middle-earth in which he analyses the unpublished manuscripts of his fatherJ. R. R. Tolkien. It contains "The Annals of Aman" which presents the history of Arda with year-by-year entries like real-worldannals, and "Athrabeth Finrod ah Andreth" which presents a discussion of death and immortality between an Elf and a human.

Reviewers welcomed the volume, noting that it reveals Tolkien exploring hard questions about his mythology, and struggling to reconcile them, to the extent that he unsuccessfully attempts a destructivereworking of the entire cosmology of Arda. The issues covered include death, immortality, and the extent to which Tolkien embodied Christianity in Middle-earth; evil and the origin of Orcs; and Tolkien's attempts to replace his mythology with "feigned history".

Book

[edit]

Contents

[edit]
Diagram of the documents comprising Tolkien's Legendarium, as interpreted very strictly, strictly, or more broadly
Navigable diagram ofTolkien's legendarium.Morgoth's Ring presents materials related toQuenta Silmarillion.

Morgoth's Ring presents source materials and editorial commentary on the following:

  • Later (1951) revisions ofThe Silmarillion, showing Tolkien's drastic revisiting and rewriting of his legends.
  • "The Annals of Aman" — the history of the world from the entry of theValar intoArda until theHiding of Valinor after the revolt and exile of theNoldor. It is written in the form of year-by-year entries of varying lengths, much like real-worldannals.Tolkien attributes the work to the Noldorin lore-master and linguist Rúmil of Tirion. There are three extant versions of the text, including a carefully emended manuscript, a typescript and its carbon copy, each featuring different corrections and notes, and a typescript of the earlier sections of the text that deviates from the previous typescript. Christopher Tolkien surmises that the first typescript was composed in 1958. According to the second typescript,The Annals of Aman were remembered by the Noldorin Exiles in Middle-earth, who transmitted their knowledge to the Men ofNúmenor, whence it eventually reached Arnor andGondor. A reworking of the earlier "Annals of Valinor" and connected closely with the narrative of the incomplete 1937Quenta Silmarillion, "The Annals of Aman" moves from a compressed narrative style to a fuller accounting of the events of the chronology.
  • "Laws and Customs among the Eldar" — several essays and legends on theEldar (Elves), particularly their mating and naming customs, and their conceptions of thefëa (soul) andhröa (body).

  • "Athrabeth Finrod ah Andreth" — A discussion between two characters,Finrod Felagund, an Elven king, and Andreth, a mortal woman, about the nature ofdeath and immortality, and the ways in which Elves andMen suffer their different sorrows;[a] and about the healing of the world and the fear of death by the hope of thecoming ofEru Iluvatar into Middle-earth.
  • "Tale of Adanel" — the Middle-earth version ofthe Fall, attached to "Athrabeth".
  • "Myths Transformed" — several fragments on Morgoth, Sauron, and theproblem of the origin of the Orcs. This section, which proposes inconsistent solutions to the problem, is frequently cited in discussions ofTolkien's legendarium, and represents the author's later-evolved views on some central topics.

Title and inscription

[edit]

The title of this volume comes from a statement in one of Tolkien's essays: "Just asSauron concentrated his power in theOne Ring,Morgoth dispersed his power into the very matter ofArda, thus the whole ofMiddle-earth was Morgoth's Ring".[1]

The title page of each volume ofThe History of Middle-earth displays an inscription in theFëanorian characters (Tengwar, an alphabet devised by Tolkien forHigh-elven), written by Christopher Tolkien and describing the contents of the book. The inscription in Volume X reads: "In this book are given many of the later writings of John Ronald Reuel Tolkien concerning the history of the Elder Days from theMusic of the Ainur to theHiding of Valinor; here much is told of the Sun and Moon; of the immortal Eldar and the death of the Atani; of the beginning of theOrcs and of the evil power ofMelkor, the Morgoth, the Black Foe of the World."

Reception

[edit]

Death, immortality, and Christianity

[edit]
Further information:Death and immortality in Middle-earth

Reviewing the book forMythlore,Glen GoodKnight wrote that in it, Christopher Tolkien leads the reader into "new third phase of his father's concept of Middle-earth after the writing ofThe Lord of the Rings — his recasting and adding to the mythos." In his view, the book is a major "earthquake" bringing "astounding revelations" about Tolkien's development of Middle-earth.[2] One is the "Athrabeth Finrod ah Andreth" (The Debate of Finrod and Andreth), meant to be the last item inThe Silmarillion's appendix; it presents opinions of death held by Men and Elves. Andreth complains of how unfair Man's short life is, believing death to be imposed byMorgoth, while Finrod speaks of hope, and that he believes human's death to be given byEru, and not imposed by Morgoth.[2] Tolkien comments on the passage that "Finrod has already guessed that the redemptive function was originally specially assigned to Men", leading GoodKnight to observe that Tolkien here aligns "his mythology very closely to his faith and theological belief in the primary world."[2]

In her 2008The Evolution of Tolkien's Mythology,[3]Elizabeth Whittingham calls theAthrabeth the nearest that Tolkien got toChristian theology anywhere in his legendarium.[4] Further, she notes,Glorfindel is the only Elf who is reincarnated, while he abandoned the concept everywhere else. According to Deidre Dawson, who reviewed her book, this suggests that Tolkien kept the "possibility" of this non-Christian concept to allow his Elves to be immortal.[4]

Evil and the origin of Orcs

[edit]
Further information:Evil in Middle-earth andTolkien's moral dilemma

Tolkien had a long-standing and unresolved challenge with the origin of Orcs, whether they were "irredeemably evil" (if derived from evil) or as Tolkien here states, bred from Men (who would be redeemable).[5] Amelia Rutledge writes that "theodicy, the study of justice and of the nature of evil" is the "central concern" ofMorgoth's Ring.[6]David Bratman, inMythprint, finds interesting Tolkien's explanation that unlike Sauron, Morgoth's evil could not be fully purged from the world, because he had spread himself all through its physical matter.[5] All in all, Bratman writes, the philosophical writings in the volume are "unlike almost anything else" inHistory of Middle-earth, as "what they most resemble is some of the long self-explanatoryletters that Tolkien wrote to readers in the late 1950s".[5]

"Feigned history" versus mythology

[edit]
See also:Cosmology of Tolkien's legendarium andHistory of Arda

The co-founder of the Tolkien SocietyCharles Noad writes that Tolkien was "virtually attempting a [destructive] reinvention of his mythology", including Arda's cosmology, "Elvish reincarnation, the origins of Orcs, and the powers of Morgoth."[7] Noad comments that the attempt to rework the cosmology was an "alarming and destructive débâcle" that would effectively had demythologised his whole mythology, but that Tolkien broadly succeeded in his other attempted problem resolutions.[7] Dawson describes the situation as Tolkien's "steady movement away from the archetypes and structures of ancient pagan myths, towards a mythology for the modern era which includes more elements inspired by biblical texts," as seen inMorgoth's Ring.[4]

Bratman comments that the reader enters the "Myths Transformed" section at their peril, "for here you will see the author probing the absolute rock-bottom theoretical base of his subcreation."[5] The material reveals, too, why Tolkiencould not completeThe Silmarillion, as he grappled with his changing view of the acceptability of a mythology as against a "feigned history".[5] The later volumeThe Nature of Middle-earth presents more of Tolkien's attempts to resolve the dilemma.[8]

Structure ofThe Silmarillion

[edit]
Further information:The Silmarillion

GoodKnight writes that the materials inMorgoth's Ring could have radically changedThe Silmarillion, had Tolkien lived to finish it "to his satisfaction".[2] Noad, reviewingMorgoth's Ring inMallorn, approves of Tolkien's intention to give his plannedThe Silmarillion shape with theAthrabeth at the end, with the "Great Tales" printed in full as appendices to the text, a structure that would in his view have been a great improvement. He praises Christopher Tolkien for his "clarity of exposition ... clothed in expressive grace".[7]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^These themes are discussed further atThe Tale of Aragorn and Arwen#Love and death.

References

[edit]
  1. ^J. R. R. Tolkien (1993).Christopher Tolkien (ed.).Morgoth's Ring. Boston & New York:Houghton Mifflin. p. xi.ISBN 0-395-68092-1.
  2. ^abcdGoodKnight, Glen (15 March 1994)."A Thing Wholly Different".Mythlore.20 (2). article 10.
  3. ^Whittingham, Elizabeth A. (2008).The Evolution of Tolkien's Mythology: A Study of the History of Middle-earth.McFarland.ISBN 978-1-4766-1174-7.
  4. ^abcDawson, Deidre A. (2008). "The Evolution of Tolkien's Mythology: A Study of the History of Middle-earth (review)".Tolkien Studies.5 (1):205–209.doi:10.1353/tks.0.0028.
  5. ^abcdeBratman, David (January 1994)."Tolkien Review:Morgoth's Ring: The Later Silmarillion, Part One (The Legends of Aman), by J.R.R. Tolkien, edited by Christopher Tolkien. The History of Middle-earth, Volume 10".Mythprint.31 (1):2–4, 7, 9.
  6. ^Rutledge, Amelia A. (2012). ""Justice is not Healing": J. R. R. Tolkien's Pauline Constructs in "Finwë and Míriel"".Tolkien Studies.9 (1):59–74.doi:10.1353/tks.2012.0009.
  7. ^abcNoad, Charles (September 1993). "[Review ofMorgoth's Ring]".Mallorn (30):33–42, 49.JSTOR 45320367.
  8. ^Larsen, Kristine (2021)."The Walls of the World and the Voyages of the Evening Star: The Byzantine Borders of Tolkien's Biblical/Classical/Medieval/Geocentric/Heliocentric Complicated Cosmology".Journal of Tolkien Research.13 (1). Article 3.
Works
In Tolkien's
lifetime
Posthumous
History of
composition
History of
Middle-earth
Others
Fictional
universe
Peoples,
monsters
Characters
Places
Objects
Analysis
Elements
Themes
Literary
Geographic
Adaptations,
legacy
Illustrators
Composers
Settings
Other media
Literary
criticism
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morgoth%27s_Ring&oldid=1296649308"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp