Assembled mosaic of Miranda using imagery fromVoyager 2, January 1986. Large coronae scar Miranda's varied surface, with the bright angular corona at center beingInverness Corona
At just 470 km (290 mi) in diameter, Miranda is one of the smallest closely observed objects in theSolar System that might be inhydrostatic equilibrium (spherical under its own gravity), and its total surface area is roughly equal to that of the U.S. state ofTexas. The only close-up images of Miranda are from theVoyager 2 probe, which made observations of Miranda during its Uranus flyby in January 1986. During the flyby, Miranda's southern hemisphere pointed towards theSun, so only that part was studied.
Miranda probably formed from anaccretion disc that surrounded the planet shortly after its formation and, like other large moons, it is likelydifferentiated, with an inner core of rock surrounded by amantle of ice. Miranda has one of the most extreme and varied topographies of any object in the Solar System, includingVerona Rupes, a roughly 20-kilometre-high (12 mi) scarp that may be the highestcliff in the Solar System,[10][11] and chevron-shapedtectonic features calledcoronae. The origin and evolution of this varied geology, the most of any Uranian satellite, are still not fully understood, and multiple hypotheses exist regarding Miranda's evolution.
Miranda was discovered on 16 February 1948 by planetary astronomerGerard Kuiper using the McDonald Observatory's 82-inch (2,080 mm)Otto Struve Telescope.[9][12] Its motion around Uranus was confirmed on 1 March 1948.[9] It was the first satellite of Uranus discovered in nearly 100 years. Kuiper elected to name the object "Miranda" after thecharacter inShakespeare'sThe Tempest, because the four previously discovered moons of Uranus,Ariel,Umbriel,Titania, andOberon, had all been named after characters of Shakespeare orAlexander Pope. However, the previous moons had been named specifically after fairies,[13] whereas Miranda was a human. Subsequently discovered satellites of Uranus were named after characters from Shakespeare and Pope, whether fairies or not. The moon is also designated Uranus V.
Planetary moons other than Earth's were never given symbols in the astronomical literature. Denis Moskowitz, a software engineer who designed most of thedwarf planet symbols, proposed an M (the initial of Miranda) combined with the low globe ofJérôme Lalande's Uranus symbol as the symbol of Miranda (). This symbol is not widely used.[14]
Of Uranus's five round satellites, Miranda orbits closest to it, at roughly 129 000 km from the surface; about a quarter again as far as its most distantring. It is the round moon that has the smallest orbit around a major planet. Itsorbital period is 34 hours and, like that of theMoon, is synchronous with itsrotation period, which means it always shows the same face to Uranus, a condition known astidal locking. Miranda's orbitalinclination (4.34°) is unusually high for a body so close to its planet – roughly ten times that of the other major Uranian satellites, and 73 times that of Oberon.[15] The reason for this is still uncertain; there are nomean-motion resonances between the moons that could explain it, leading to the hypothesis that the moons occasionally pass through secondary resonances, which at some point in the past led to Miranda being locked for a time into a 3:1 resonance with Umbriel, before chaotic behaviour induced by the secondary resonances moved it out again.[16] In the Uranian system, due to the planet's lesser degree ofoblateness and the larger relative size of its satellites, escape from a mean-motion resonance is much easier than for satellites ofJupiter orSaturn.[17][18]
Miranda's apparent magnitude is +16.6, making it invisible to many amateur telescopes.[8] Virtually all known information regarding its geology and geography was obtained during theflyby of Uranus made byVoyager 2 on 25 January 1986,[19] The closest approach ofVoyager 2 to Miranda was 29,000 km (18,000 mi)—significantly less than the distances to all other Uranian moons.[20] Of all the Uranian satellites, Miranda had the most visible surface.[21] The discovery team had expected Miranda to resemble Mimas, and found themselves at a loss to explain the moon's unique geography in the 24-hour window before releasing the images to the press.[22] In 2017, as part of itsPlanetary Science Decadal Survey,NASA evaluated the possibility of an orbiter to return to Uranus some time in the 2020s.[23] Uranus was the preferred destination over Neptune due to favourable planetary alignments meaning shorter flight times.[24]
At 1.15 g/cm3, Miranda is the least dense of Uranus's round satellites. That density suggests a composition of more than 60% water ice.[25] Miranda's surface may be mostly water ice, though it is far rockier than its corresponding satellites in the Saturn system, indicating that heat fromradioactive decay may have led tointernal differentiation, allowingsilicate rock andorganic compounds to settle in its interior.[19][26] Miranda is too small for any internal heat to have been retained over the age of the Solar System.[27] Miranda is the least spherical of Uranus's satellites, with an equatorial diameter 3% wider than its polar diameter. Only water has been detected so far on Miranda's surface, though it has been speculated thatmethane,ammonia,carbon monoxide or nitrogen may also exist at 3% concentrations.[26][21] These bulk properties are similar to Saturn's moonMimas, though Mimas is smaller, less dense, and more oblate.[21] In 2024, Strom et al.[28] conducted geological mapping of Miranda's southern hemisphere based on spatially resolved images from theVoyager 2 fly-by, followed by comparison of the observed geological features to modelling oftidal stress innatural satellites. This study suggested that Miranda might have had a liquid ocean of about 100 km thickness beneath the surface within the last 100-500 million years.[28]
Precisely how a body as small as Miranda could have enough internal energy to produce the myriad geological features seen on its surface has not been established with certainty,[27] though the currently favoured hypothesis is that it was driven bytidal heating during a past time when it was in 3:1 orbital resonance with Umbriel.[29] The resonance would have increased Miranda'sorbital eccentricity to 0.1, and generated tidal friction due to the varyingtidal forces from Uranus.[30] As Miranda approached Uranus, tidal force increased; as it retreated, tidal force decreased, causing flexing that would have warmed Miranda's interior by 20 K, enough to trigger melting.[17][18][30] The period of tidal flexing could have lasted for up to 100 million years.[30] Also, ifclathrate existed within Miranda, as has been hypothesised for the satellites of Uranus, it may have acted as an insulator, since it has a lower conductivity than water, increasing Miranda's temperature still further.[30] Miranda may have also once been in a 5:3 orbital resonance with Ariel, which would have also contributed to its internal heating. However, the maximum heating attributable to the resonance with Umbriel was likely about three times greater.[29]
Miranda has a unique surface.[31][32] Among the geological structures that cover it are fractures, faults, valleys, craters, ridges, gorges, depressions, cliffs, and terraces.[33][34] This moon is a mosaic of highly varied zones. Some areas are older and darker. As such, they bear numerous impact craters, as is expected of a small inert body.[31] Other regions are made of rectangular or ovoid strips. They feature complex sets of parallel ridges and rupes (fault scarps) as well as numerous outcrops of bright and dark materials, suggesting an exotic composition.[35] This moon is most likely composed only of water ice on the surface, as well as silicate rocks and other more or less buried organic compounds.[35]
Main geological structures visible on the known part of Miranda[36] (all named in reference to works byWilliam Shakespeare)
Theregiones identified on the images taken by theVoyager 2 probe are named "Mantua Regio", "Ephesus Regio", "Sicilia Regio", and "Dunsinane Regio".[36] They designate major regions of Miranda where hilly terrain and plains follow one another, more or less dominated by ancient impact craters.[37] Normalfaults also mark these ancient regions. Someescarpments are as old as the formation of the regions while others are much more recent and appear to have formed after the coronae.[38] These faults are accompanied bygrabens characteristic of ancient tectonic activity.[37] The surface of these regions is fairly uniformly dark. However, the cliffs bordering certain impact craters reveal, at depth, the presence of much more luminous material.[37]
Illustration of the positions of the main geological structures on an image of Miranda
Miranda is one of very few objects in the Solar system to havecrowns (also called coronae). The three known coronae observed on Miranda are named Inverness Corona near the south pole, Arden Corona at theapex of the moon's orbital motion, and Elsinore Corona at the antapex.[36] The highestalbedo contrasts on Miranda's surface occur within the Inverness and Arden coronae.[39]
The Inverness Corona is characterized by its white central "chevron". The crater Alonso is visible in the upper right, as well as the cliffs of Argier Rupes in the upper left.
Inverness Corona is a trapezoidal region of approximately 200 km (120 mi) on a side which lies near the south pole. This region is characterized by a central geological structure which takes the shape of a luminous chevron,[40] a surface with a relatively high albedo, and a series of gorges which extend northwards from a point near the pole.[41] At a latitude of around −55°, north-south oriented gorges tend to intersect with others, which follow an east-west direction.[41] The outer boundary of Inverness, as well as its internal patterns of ridges and bands of contrastingalbedos, form numerous salient angles.[39] It is bounded on three sides (south, east and north) by a complex system of faults. The nature of the west coast is less clear, but may also be tectonic. Within the crown, the surface is dominated by parallel gorges spaced a few kilometers apart.[42] The low number ofimpact craters indicates that Inverness is the youngest among the three coronae observed on the surface of Miranda.[43]
Arden Corona, present in the front hemisphere of Miranda, extends over approximately 300 km (190 mi) from east to west. The other dimension, however, remains unknown because the terrain extended beyond theterminator (on the hemisphere plunged into night) whenVoyager 2 photographed it. The outer margin of this corona forms parallel and dark bands which surround in gentle curves a more clearly rectangular core at least 100 km (62 mi) wide. The overall effect has been described as an ovoid of lines.[39] The interior and belt of Arden show very different morphologies. The interior topography appears regular and soft. It is also characterized by a mottled pattern resulting from large patches of relatively bright material scattered over a generally dark surface. The stratigraphic relationship between the light and dark marks could not be determined from the images provided byVoyager 2. The area at the margin of Arden is characterized by concentric albedo bands which extend from the western end of the crown where they intersect crateriform terrain (near 40° longitude) and on the side east, where they extend beyond the, in the northern hemisphere (near 110° longitude).[44] The contrasting albedo bands are composed of outer fault scarp faces.[44] This succession of escarpments gradually pushes the land into a deep hollow along the border between Arden and the crateriform terrain called Mantua Regio.[44] Arden was formed during a geological episode which preceded the formation of Inverness but which is contemporary with the formation of Elsinore.[43]
Elsinore Corona is the third corona, which was observed in the rear hemisphere of Miranda, along theterminator. It is broadly similar to Arden in size and internal structure. They both have an outer belt about 100 km (62 mi) wide, which wraps around an inner core.[39] Thetopography of the core of Elsinore consists of a complex set of intersections of troughs and bumps which are truncated by this outer belt which is marked by roughly concentric linear ridges. The troughs also include small segments of rolling, cratered terrain.[39] Elsinore also presents segments of furrows, called "sulcus",[36] comparable to those observed onGanymede.[39]
Close-up view ofVerona Rupes, a cliff 5 to 10 km (3.1 to 6.2 mi) high.[45]
Miranda also features enormousescarpments that can be traced across the moon. Some of them are older than the coronae, others younger. The most spectacular fault system begins at a deep valley visible at the terminator.
This network of faults begins on the northwest side of Inverness where it forms a deep gorge on the outer edge of the ovoid which surrounds the crown.[39] This geological formation is named "Argier Rupes".[36]
The most impressive fault then extends to the terminator, extending from the top of the central "chevron" of Inverness.[39] Near the terminator, a gigantic luminous cliff, namedVerona Rupes,[36] forms complexgrabens. The fault is approximately 20 km (12 mi) wide, the graben at the bright edge is 10 to 15 km (9.3 mi) deep.[39] The height of the sheer cliff is 5 to 10 km (6.2 mi).[39] Although it could not be observed by theVoyager 2 probe on the face immersed in thepolar night of Miranda, it is probable that this geological structure extends beyond the terminator in the northern hemisphere.[43]
During the close flyby ofVoyager 2 in January 1986, only the craters on the southern hemisphere of Miranda could be observed. They generally had diameters of over 500 m (1,600 ft), representing the limit of resolution of the digital images transmitted by the probe during its flight.[43] These craters have very varied morphologies. Some have well-defined borders and are sometimes surrounded by ejecta deposits characteristic ofimpact craters. Others are very degraded and sometimes barely recognizable, as their topography has been altered.[46] The age of a crater does not give an indication of the date of formation of the terrain it marked. On the other hand, this date depends on the number of craters present on a site, regardless of their age.[47] The more impact craters a terrain has, the older it is. Scientists use these as "planetary chronometers"; they count observed craters to date the formation of the terrain of inert natural satellites devoid of atmospheres, such asCallisto.[48]
No multiple ring crater, nor any complex crater with a central peak, has been observed on Miranda.[46] Simple craters, that is to say whose cavity is bowl-shaped, and transitional craters (with a flat bottom) are the norm, with their diameter not correlated to their shape.[46] Thus simple craters of more than 15 km (9.3 mi) are observed while elsewhere transitional craters of 2.5 km (1.6 mi) have been identified.[46] Ejecta deposits are rare, and are never associated with craters larger than 15 km (9.3 mi) in diameter.[46] The ejecta that sometimes surround craters with a diameter less than 3 km (1.9 mi) appear systematically brighter than the material surrounding them. On the other hand, ejecta associated with craters of size between 3 km (1.9 mi) and 15 km (9.3 mi) are generally darker than what surrounds them (the albedo of the ejecta is lower than that of the matter surrounding them).[46] Finally, some ejecta deposits, associated with diameters of all sizes, have an albedo comparable to that of the material on which they rest.[46]
In some regiones, and particularly in those of the visible part of the anti-Uranian hemisphere (which continually turns its back on the planet), craters are very frequent. They are sometimes stuck to each other with very little space between each one.[46] Elsewhere, craters are less frequent and are separated by large, weakly undulated surfaces.[46] The rim of many craters is surrounded by luminous material while streaks of dark material are observed on the walls which surround the bottom of the craters.[46] In Matuna Regio, between the craters Truncilo and Fransesco, there is a gigantic circular geological structure of 170 km (110 mi) in diameter which could be abasin impact very significantly degraded.[46] These findings suggest that these regions contain a shiny material at shallow depth, while a layer of dark material (or a material which darkens upon contact with the external environment) is present, at greater depth.[44]
Craters are statistically up to ten times less numerous in the coronae than in the anti-Uranian regions, which indicates that these formations are younger.[49]
The density of impact craters could be established for different areas of Inverness, and made it possible to establish the age of each.[50] Considering these measurements, the entire geological formation was formed in a relative unit of time.[51] However, other observations make it possible to establish that the youngest zone, within this crown, is the one which separates the "chevron", from Argier Rupes.[51]
The density of impact craters in the core and in the Arden belt is statistically similar.[50] The two distinct parts of this formation must therefore have been part of a common geological episode.[50] Nevertheless, the superposition of craters on bands of the central core of Arden indicates that its formation preceded that of the scarps which surround it.[50] The data from the impact craters can be interpreted as follows: the interior and marginal zones of the corona, including most of the albedo bands, were formed during the same period of time.[50] Their formation was followed by later tectonic developments which produced the high-relief fault scarps observed along the edge of the crown near longitude 110°.[50]
The density of impact craters seems the same in the structure surrounding Elsinore as in its central core.[52] The two zones of the crown seem to have formed during the same geological period, but other geological elements suggest that the perimeter of Elsinore is younger than its core.[52]
The number of craters should be higher in the hemisphere at the apex of the orbital movement than at the antapex.[53] However, it is the anti-Uranian hemisphere which is densest in craters.[54] This situation could be explained by a past event having caused a reorientation of Miranda's axis of rotation by 90° compared to that which is currently known.[54] In this case, the paleoapex hemisphere of the moon would have become the current anti-Uranian hemisphere.[54] However, the count of impact craters being limited to the southern hemisphere only, illuminated during the passage of the Voyager 2 probe, it is possible that Miranda has experienced a more complex reorientation and that its paleoapex is located somewhere in the northern hemisphere, which has not yet been photographed.[54]
Several scenarios are proposed to explain its formation and geological evolution.[43][31] One of them postulates that it would result from theaccretion of a disk of gas and dust called a "subnebula".[55] This sub-nebula either existed around Uranus for some period of time after its formation, or was created following acosmic impact which would have given its great obliquity to the axis of rotation of Uranus.[55] However, this relatively small moon has areas that are surprisingly young compared to thegeological time scale.[56] It seems that the most recent geological formations only date back a few hundred million years.[57] However, thermal models applicable to moons the size of Miranda predict rapid cooling and the absence of geological evolution following its accretion from the subnebula.[58] Geological activity over such a long period cannot be justified either by the heat resulting from the initial accretion, nor by the heat generated by thefission of radioactive materials involved in the formation.[58]
Miranda has the youngest surface among those of the satellites of the Uranian system, which indicates that its geography has undergone the most important evolutions.[43] This geography would be explained by a complex geological history including a still unknown combination of different astronomical phenomena.[31] Among these phenomena would betidal forces, mechanisms oforbital resonances, processes ofpartial differentiation, or even movements ofconvection.[31]
The geological patchwork could be partly the result of a catastrophic collision with animpactor.[31] This event may have completely dislocated Miranda.[43] The different pieces would then have re-assembled, then gradually reorganized in the spherical form that theVoyager 2 probe photographed.[59] Some scientists even speak of several cycles of collision and re-accretion of the moon.[60] This geological hypothesis was depreciated in 2011 in favor of hypotheses involving Uranian tidal forces. These would have pulled and turned the materials present under Inverness and Arden to create fault scarps. The stretching and distortion caused by Uranus's gravity, which alone could have provided the heat source necessary to power these uprisings.[61]
The oldest known regions on the surface of Miranda are cratered plains such as Sicilia Regio and Ephesus Regio.[57] The formation of these terrains follows the accretion of the moon then its cooling.[57] The bottoms of the oldest craters are thus partially covered with material from the depths of the moon referred to as endogenous resurfacing, which was a surprising observation.[57] The geological youth of Miranda demonstrates that a heat source then took over from the initial heat provided by the accretion of the moon.[57] The most satisfactory explanation for the origin of the heat which animated the moon is the one which also explains thevolcanism on Io: a situation oforbital resonance now on Miranda and the important phenomenon oftidal forces generated by Uranus.[56]
After this first geological epoch, Miranda experienced a period of cooling which generated an overall extension of its core and produced fragments and cracks of its mantle on the surface, in the form ofgrabens.[57] It is indeed possible that Miranda,Ariel, andUmbriel participated in several important resonances involving the pairs Miranda/Ariel, Ariel/Umbriel, and Miranda/Umbriel.[62] Unlike those observed on Jupiter's moonIo, these orbital resonance phenomena between Miranda and Ariel could not lead to a stable capture of the small moon.[62] Instead of being captured, Miranda's orbital resonance with Ariel and Umbriel may have led to the increase in its eccentricity and orbital inclination.[63] By successively escaping several orbital resonances, Miranda alternated phases of heating and cooling.[64] Thus all the known grabens of Miranda were not formed during this second geological episode.[57]
A third major geological epoch occurs with the orbital reorientation of Miranda and the formation of Elsinore and Arden coronae.[57] A singular volcanic event, made of flows of solid materials, could then to have taken place, within the coronae in formation.[65] Another explanation proposed for the formation of these two coronae would be the product of adiapir which would have formed in the heart of the moon.[66][67] On this occasion Miranda would have at least partially differentiated.[66] Considering the size and position of these coronae, it is possible that their formation contributed to changing themoment of inertia of the moon.[54] This could have caused a 90° reorientation of Miranda.[54] Doubt remains as to the concomitant existence of these two formations.[54] It is possible that at this time, the moon was distorted to the point that its asphericity and eccentricity temporarily caused it to undergo a chaotic rotational movement, such as that observed onHyperion.[64] If Miranda's orbital reorientation occurred before the two coronae formed on the surface, then Elsinore would be older than Arden.[57] Chaotic movement phenomena generated by the entry into 3:1 resonance between the orbit of Miranda and that of Umbriel could have contributed to an increase in Miranda's orbital inclination greater than 3°.[63]
A final geological episode consists of the formation of Inverness which seems to have induced surface tensions which gave rise to the creation of additional grabens including Verona Rupes and Argier Rupes.[57] Following this new cooling of Miranda, its total volume could have increased by 4%.[68] It is probable that these different geological episodes followed one another without interruption.[57]
Ultimately, Miranda's geological history may have spanned a period of more than 3 billion years. It would have started 3.5 billion years ago with the appearance of heavily cratered regions and ended a few hundred million years ago, with the formation of the coronae.[58]
The phenomena of orbital resonances, and mainly that associated withUmbriel, but also, to a lesser extent, that ofAriel, would have had a significant impact on the orbital eccentricity of Miranda,[29] and would also have contributed to the internal heating and geological activity of the moon. The whole would have induced convection movements in its substrate and allowed the start of planetary differentiation.[29] At the same time, these phenomena would have only slightly disturbed the orbits of the other moons involved, which are more massive than Miranda.[29] However, Miranda's surface may appear too tortured to be the sole product of orbital resonance phenomena.[64]
After Miranda escaped from this resonance with Umbriel, through a mechanism that likely moved the moon into its current, abnormally high orbital tilt, the eccentricity would have been reduced.[29] The tidal forces would then have erased the eccentricity and the temperature at the heart of the moon. This would have allowed it to regain a spherical shape, without allowing it to erase the impressive geological artifacts such as Verona Rupes.[64] This eccentricity being the source of thetidal forces, its reduction would have deactivated the heat source which fueled the ancient geological activity of Miranda, making it a cold and inert moon.[29]
^abcR. H. Brown (1990). "Physical Properties of the Uranian Satellites". In Jay T. Bergstralh; Ellis D. Miner; Mildred Shapley Matthews (eds.).Uranus. University of Arizona Press. pp. 513–528.ISBN978-0-8165-1208-9.
^abS.K. Croft; L. A. Brown (1991). "Geology of the Uranian Satellites". In Jay T. Bergstralh; Ellis D. Miner; Mildred Shapley Matthews (eds.).Uranus. University of Arizona Press. pp. 309–319.ISBN978-0-8165-1208-9.
^abcdefAstrogeology Science Center."Advanced nomenclature search".Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature.United States Geological Survey. Retrieved4 June 2024. Direct link to all official names of features on Miranda unavailable due to target site structure. Select "Miranda" from "Target" dropdown to view.
R. Cowen (1993). "Miranda: Shattering an old image".Science News, Society for Science & the Public. Vol. 144, no. 19. p. 300.JSTOR3977582.
Croft, S. K.; Greenberg, R. (1991). "Geology of the Uranian Satellites". In Jay T. Bergstralh; Ellis D. Miner; Mildred Shapley Matthews (eds.).Uranus. University of Arizona Press. pp. 693–735.ISBN978-0-8165-1208-9.
Encrenaz, Thérèse (2010).Les planètes, les nôtres et les autres. EDP Sciences collection (in French). Les Ulis.ISBN978-2-7598-0444-3.
Frankel, Charles (2009).Dernières nouvelles des planètes. Science ouverte (in French). Paris: Seuil.ISBN978-2-02-096549-1.
Jacobson, R. A.; Campbell, J. K.; Taylor, A. H.; Synnott, S. P. (June 1992). "The masses of Uranus and its major satellites from Voyager tracking data and earth-based Uranian satellite data".The Astronomical Journal.103 (6):2068–2078.Bibcode:1992AJ....103.2068J.doi:10.1086/116211.
Jankowski, David G.; Squyres, Steven W. (1988). "Solid-State Ice Volcanism on the Satellites of Uranus".Science News. Vol. 241, no. 4871. American Association for the Advancement of Science. pp. 1322–1325.JSTOR1702093.
O. Mousis (2004). "Modeling the thermodynamical conditions in the Uranian subnebula - Implications for regular satellite composition".Astronomy and Astrophysics.413:373–380.Bibcode:2004A&A...413..373M.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031515.
Pappalardo, Robert T.; Greeley, Ronald (1993). "Structural evidence for reorientation of Miranda about a paleo-pole".In Lunar and Planetary Inst., Twenty-Fourth Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Part 3: N-Z. pp. 1111–1112.Bibcode:1993LPI....24.1111P.
Waldrop, M. Mitchell (1986). "Voyage to a Blue Planet".Science News. Vol. 231, no. 4741. American Association for the Advancement of Science. pp. 916–918.JSTOR1696951.
.svg)
