Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party | |
|---|---|
| Abbreviation | DFL |
| Chairperson | Richard Carlbom |
| Governor | Tim Walz |
| Lieutenant Governor | Peggy Flanagan |
| Senate President | Bobby Joe Champion |
| Senate Leader | Erin Murphy |
| House Leader | Vacant |
| Founded | April 15, 1944; 81 years ago (1944-04-15) |
| Merger of | Minnesota Democratic Party andMinnesota Farmer–Labor Party[1][2] |
| Headquarters | 255 Plato Boulevard East Saint Paul,Minnesota |
| Youth wing | Minnesota Young DFL (MYDFL) |
| Ideology | Modern liberalism[3] Progressivism[4][5][6] Populism[7][8] |
| Political position | Center-left[9][3] |
| National affiliation | Democratic Party[9][10] |
| Colors | Blue |
| State Senate | 34 / 67 |
| State House | 66 / 134 |
| Statewide Executive Offices | 5 / 5 |
| U.S. Senate | 2 / 2 |
| U.S. House of Representatives | 4 / 8 |
| Election symbol | |
| Website | |
| dfl | |
TheMinnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL) is a political party in the U.S. state ofMinnesota affiliated with the nationalDemocratic Party.[11][12] The party was formed by a merger between theMinnesota Democratic Party and theMinnesota Farmer–Labor Party in 1944.[13] The DFL is one of two state Democratic Party affiliates with a different name from that of the national party, the other being the neighboringNorth Dakota Democratic–Nonpartisan League Party.[11]
The DFL controls four of Minnesota's eightU.S. House seats, both of itsU.S. Senate seats, theMinnesota Senate, and all other statewide offices, including thegovernorship, making it the dominant party in the state. In theMinnesota House, it has apower-sharing agreement with its main political rival, theRepublican Party of Minnesota, following a tie in the2024 election.
The Nonpartisan League (NPL), founded in North Dakota in 1915 was anagrarian party focused on farmer grievances against corporatemonopolies.[14] It expanded to Minnesota in 1917 and in 1918 it merged with the Duluth Union Labor Party to create theFarmer–Labor Party (FLP).
During the 1930s, the FLP gained support with radical platforms against economic and social inequalities. The party won the 1930 gubernatorial election underFloyd B. Olson. During this decade, Democrats had minimal success in the state now that the FLP effectively captured the left-wing vote and drew support away from urban workers, rural farmers, and immigrants. The party often won only single digits in statewide races as the FLP aligned informally with Roosevelt'sNew Deal coalition.
By 1938, the Farmer–Labor party's influence waned because of internal conflicts and accusations of incompetence and corruption, leading to a loss inthat year's gubernatorial election.[15] The party suffered further setbacks in 1940 and 1942, losing congressional seats andthe gubernatorial race.
On April 15, 1944, the Farmer–Labor Party merged with theMinnesota Democratic Party, forming the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL).[16] Leading the merger effort were Elmer Kelm, the head of the Minnesota Democratic Party and the foundingchairman of the DFL;Elmer Benson, effectively the head of the Farmer–Labor Party by virtue of his leadership of its dominant left-wing faction; and rising starHubert H. Humphrey, who chaired the Fusion Committee that accomplished the union and then went on to chair its first state convention.[17] This merger marked a pivotal shift influenced by academic liberals at theUniversity of Minnesota who advocated for integrating theNew Deal's progressive reforms within a more centralized, managerial political framework, transitioning from the movement-oriented politics of the Farmer-Labor party to a structure that emphasized interest-group pluralism.
During the post-war years, the DFL confronted various social issues, includingantisemitism, which reflected broader national conversations about race and ethnicity. The DFL also navigated with its stance oncivil rights and economic justice, influenced significantly by Minnesota's small but politically activeAfrican American communities. In early 1946, as aFair Employment Practice (FEPC) bill was moving through Congress, there was a surge of civil rights activism in the Twin Cities.[18]
Factional battles were intensified by differing views on how to address the left-wing influence within the party, with significant conflicts between proponents ofHenry A. Wallace's progressive policies and the more moderate wing led by figures likeHubert Humphrey. By the party's second convention in 1946, tensions had re-emerged between members of the two former parties. While the majority of delegates supported left-wing policies, Humphrey managed to install a more conservative, anti-communist ally,Orville Freeman, as party secretary.[19] Some disaffected Farmer–Labor leaders such as Benson moved to theProgressive Party.[13] Freemanwas elected the state's first DFL governor in 1954. Important members of the party have included Humphrey andWalter Mondale, who each went on to beUnited States senators,vice presidents of the United States, and unsuccessfulDemocratic nominees forpresident;Eugene McCarthy, a U.S. senator who ran for the Democraticpresidential nomination in 1968 as ananti-Vietnam War candidate;Paul Wellstone, a U.S. senator from 1991 to 2002 who became an icon ofpopulistprogressivism;[20]Amy Klobuchar, a U.S. senator who ran for theDemocratic nomination for president in 2020;[21]Dean Phillips, aU.S. representative who ran for theDemocratic nomination for president in 2024;[22] and Tim Walz, two-term governor chosen asKamala Harris' running mate in the2024 presidential election.[23] The DFL has had varied success beginning in the late 1970s and through the late 2010s, in part due to the growth of single-issue splinter groups after reforms brought by the national party.[17]
Following the2022 Minnesota elections, the DFL became the dominant party in the state, retaining every executive office, winning majorities in the stateHouse andSenate, and re-electing all incumbent congressional representatives. With their newly electedtrifecta, the DFL pursued a progressive agenda in theirfirst legislative session. Governor Tim Walz described the session as "the most successful legislative session, certainly in many of our lifetimes and maybe in Minnesota history."[24] The newly elected government passed large expansions in welfare programs and spending. Notable policies passed include the expansion ofabortion rights, new programs to provide reproductive healthcare, protection ofgender affirming care,[25] thelegalization of recreational cannabis, indexing education spending to inflation, investments in public transit, and paid sick leave for Minnesota workers.[25][26] Former presidentBarack Obama praised the state government's actions, saying that "Minnesota has made progress on a whole host of issues – from protecting abortion rights and new gun safety measures to expanding access to the ballot and reducing child poverty. These laws will make a real difference in the lives of Minnesotans."[27]

The DFL is governed by a state central committee, which is composed of representatives from each of the state's congressional districts. The state central committee is responsible for setting the party's platform, electing party officers, and conducting other party business. The DFL also has aconstitution andbylaws that govern its operations.[12]
The party operates several community caucuses that organize and represent different communities within Minnesota; they not defined geographically.[28] These include the:
The DFL's base of support is diverse, and it includes urban and suburban voters,working class voters,labor unions,environmentalists, and other progressive groups.[31] The party has a strong presence in theTwin Cities metropolitan area.[32] The DFL has lost support in traditional DFL strongholds such as theIron Range since 2016.[33]
Out of theeight seats Minnesota is apportioned in theU.S. House of Representatives, four are held by members of the DFL.

Through 1975, the party's constitution called for the election of a separate chairman and chairwoman to head state party activities. Only the chairman received compensation. In the mid-1970s, the party voted to change the titles of the chief party offices to chair and associate chair, specifying that they must both be salaried and must be of the opposite sex.
State chairmen[edit]
| State chairwomen[edit]
|
|
|
| Election | Votes | % | Seats (MN) | ± | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 1,234,204 | 52.2 | 5 / 8 | 62.5 | |
| 2002 | 1,097,911 | 49.9 | 4 / 8 | 50.0 | |
| 2004 | 1,399,624 | 51.4 | 4 / 8 | 50.0 | |
| 2006 | 1,152,621 | 52.9 | 5 / 8 | 62.5 | |
| 2008 | 1,612,480 | 57.5 | 5 / 8 | 62.5 | |
| 2010 | 1,002,026 | 47.9 | 4 / 8 | 50.0 | |
| 2012 | 985,760 | 55.5 | 5 / 8 | 62.5 | |
| 2014 | 985,760 | 50.2 | 5 / 8 | 62.5 | |
| 2016 | 1,434,590 | 50.2 | 5 / 8 | 62.5 | |
| 2018 | 1,420,748 | 55.1 | 5 / 8 | 62.5 | |
| 2020 | 1,554,373 | 48.7 | 4 / 8 | 50.0 | |
| 2022 | 1,250,479 | 50.1 | 4 / 8 | 50.0 | |
| 2024 | 1,579,742 | 50.2 | 4 / 8 | 50.0 |
| Year | Candidate | Votes | % | Won |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1944 | Byron G. Allen | 430,132 | 37.8 | No |
| 1946 | Harold H. Barker | 349,565 | 39.7 | No |
| 1948 | Charles Halsted | 545,766 | 45.1 | No |
| 1950 | Harry H. Peterson | 400,637 | 38.3 | No |
| 1952 | Orville Freeman | 624,480 | 44.0 | No |
| 1954 | 607,099 | 52.7 | Yes | |
| 1956 | 731,180 | 51.4 | Yes | |
| 1958 | 658,326 | 56.8 | Yes | |
| 1960 | 760,934 | 49.1 | No | |
| 1962 | Karl Rolvaag | 619,842 | 49.7 | Yes |
| 1966 | 607,943 | 46.9 | No | |
| 1970 | Wendell Anderson | 737,921 | 54.0 | Yes |
| 1974 | 786,787 | 62.8 | Yes | |
| 1978 | Rudy Perpich | 718,244 | 45.3 | No |
| 1982 | 718,244 | 58.8 | Yes | |
| 1986 | 790,138 | 56.1 | Yes | |
| 1990 | 836,218 | 46.8 | No | |
| 1994 | John Marty | 589,344 | 34.1 | No |
| 1998 | Skip Humphrey | 587,528 | 28.1 | No |
| 2002 | Roger Moe | 821,268 | 36.5 | No |
| 2006 | Mike Hatch | 1,007,460 | 45.7 | No |
| 2010 | Mark Dayton | 919,232 | 43.6 | Yes |
| 2014 | 989,113 | 50.1 | Yes | |
| 2018 | Tim Walz | 1,393,096 | 53.8 | Yes |
| 2022 | 1,312,349 | 52.3 | Yes |
| Election | Votes | % | Seats | ± | % | Majority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 1,024,624 | 51.9 | 49 / 67 | N/A | 73.1 | Yes |
| 1980 | 1,024,624 | 49.3 | 46 / 67 | 68.7 | Yes | |
| 1982 | 951,287 | 51.8 | 42 / 67 | 62.7 | Yes | |
| 1986 | 765,584 | 52.6 | 47 / 67 | 70.2 | Yes | |
| 1990 | 990,513 | 53.7 | 46 / 67 | 68.7 | Yes | |
| 1992 | 1,247,594 | 53.0 | 45 / 67 | 67.2 | Yes | |
| 1996 | 1,129,095 | 51.1 | 42 / 67 | 62.7 | Yes | |
| 2000 | 1,219,497 | 49.6 | 39 / 67 | 58.2 | Yes | |
| 2002 | 1,080,975 | 49.7 | 35 / 67 | 52.2 | Yes | |
| 2006 | 1,183,319 | 55.3 | 44 / 67 | 65.7 | Yes | |
| 2010 | 1,005,132 | 48.9 | 30 / 67 | 44.7 | No | |
| 2012 | 1,532,065 | 55.8 | 39 / 67 | 58.2 | Yes | |
| 2016 | 1,409,775 | 50.1 | 33 / 67 | 49.3 | No | |
| 2020 | 1,577,523 | 49.8 | 33 / 67 | 49.3 | No | |
| 2022 | 1,239,682 | 50.7 | 34 / 67 | 50.7 | Yes |
| Election | Votes | % | Seats | ± | % | Majority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 1,034,046 | 47.8 | 52 / 134 | 38.8 | No | |
| 2004 | 1,381,412 | 51.2 | 66 / 134 | 49.3 | No | |
| 2006 | 1,169,298 | 54.9 | 85 / 134 | 63.4 | Yes | |
| 2008 | 1,516,633 | 54.9 | 87 / 134 | 64.9 | Yes | |
| 2010 | 995,853 | 48.5 | 62 / 134 | 46.3 | No | |
| 2012 | 1,468,364 | 53.7 | 73 / 134 | 54.5 | Yes | |
| 2014 | 944,961 | 49.3 | 62 / 134 | 46.3 | No | |
| 2016 | 1,366,375 | 49.1 | 57 / 134 | 42.5 | No | |
| 2018 | 1,388,938 | 54.4 | 75 / 134 | 55.9 | Yes | |
| 2020 | 1,601,357 | 51.1 | 70 / 134 | 52.2 | Yes | |
| 2022 | 1,237,520 | 50.9 | 70 / 134 | 52.2 | Yes | |
| 2024 | 1,545,213 | 49.9 | 67 / 134 | 50.0 | No |
The Farmer-Labor movement founded the most successful third party in U.S. political history. This progressive movement elected candidates and advanced political change in Minnesota from 1917 until it merged with the Democrats in 1944, to form the DFL, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party.
Documentary about the history of the progressive Farmer-Labor movement in Minnesota from 1915 to 1944, when the party merged with the Democrats to form the DFL, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party.
Modern liberalism occupies the left-of-center in the traditional political spectrum and is represented by the Democratic Party in the United States.
Among other Midwestern state political parties, like the Libertarian Party of Minnesota, Farmer-Labor is one of the most progressive and successful.
The party champions progressive politics, including "stable employment with fair wages," "proper education," "accessible and affordable healthcare," "safe communities" and the rights of Minnesotans to "raise and provide for a family" and "retire with dignity and security," according to the DFL website […] With such a long history and strong presence in Minnesota, DFL has been tied to several, generally progressive movements and legislation.
[...] Walz follows a rich lineage of Midwestern progressive politics that starts with the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party, a state affiliate of the Democratic Party that maintains the traditions and values of populist farmer politics in the American Midwest.
[...] a unique history of liberal populism embodied by its Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party.
According to Walz, his party needs a rebranding and Minnesota's Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party and the state's brand of populism are a start.
Lesch represents the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, a center-left political party in the U.S. state of Minnesota. It is affiliated with the Democratic Party.
[…] Walz follows a rich lineage of Midwestern progressive politics that starts with the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party, a state affiliate of the Democratic Party that maintains the traditions and values of populist farmer politics in the American Midwest... Over the next several decades, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party pushed for pragmatic and progressive politics within the state's Democratic Party.