Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Might makes right

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
View that morality is, or ought to be, determined by those in power
For other uses, seeMight makes right (disambiguation).
"Might is right" redirects here. For the book, seeMight Is Right.

"Might makes right" or "might is right" is anaphorism that asserts that having superior strength or power gives one the ability to control society and enforce one's own agenda, beliefs, concepts of justice, and so on.[1][2][3]Montague definedkratocracy orkraterocracy (from theAncient Greek:κράτος,romanizedkrátos,lit.'might; strength') as a government by those strong enough to seize control through violence ordeceit.[4]

"Might makes right" has been described as thecredo oftotalitarian regimes.[5] The sociologistMax Weber analyzed the relations between a state's power and its moral authority inWirtschaft und Gesellschaft.Realist scholars ofinternational politics use the phrase to describe the "state of nature" in which power determines the relations among sovereign states.[6]

History

[edit]

The idea, though not the wording, has been attributed to theHistory of the Peloponnesian War, written around 410 BC by the ancient historianThucydides, who stated that "right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must."[7]

In the first chapter of Plato'sRepublic, authored around 375 BCThrasymachus claims that "justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger", whichSocrates then disputes.[8]Callicles inGorgias argues similarly that the strong should rule the weak, as a right owed to their superiority.[9]

TheBook of Wisdom, written around the first century BC to first century AD, describes the reasoning of the wicked: "Let us oppress the righteous poor man; let us not spare the widow nor regard the gray hairs of the aged. But let our might be our law of right, for what is weak proves itself to be useless."[10]

The related idea of "woe to the conquered" is stated inLivy'sHistory of Rome, in which the similar Latin phrase "vae victis" is first recorded.[11][12]

An early instance of the phrase in English is found inThomas Carlyle's 1839 essayChartism: "Might and Right do differ frightfully from hour to hour; but give them centuries to try it in, they are found to be identical." He later clarified his position in a journal entry from 1848, saying that "right is the eternal symbol of might" rather than the reverse.[13]

In 1846, the Americanpacifist andabolitionistAdin Ballou (1803–1890) wrote, "But now, instead of discussion and argument, brute force rises up to the rescue of discomfited error, and crushes truth and right into the dust. 'Might makes right,' and hoary folly totters on in her mad career escorted by armies and navies."[14]

Abraham Lincoln'sCooper Union speech (1860) famously reverses the phrase by stating: "Let us have faith that right makes might, and in that faith, let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it".[15][16]

Arthur Desmond authoredMight Is Right in 1896, which prompted criticism fromLeo Tolstoy.[17]

PhilosopherWilliam Pepperell Montague coined the termKratocracy, from theGreek:κρατερός (krateros), meaning "strong", for government by those who are strong enough to seize power through force or cunning.[4]

In a letter toAlbert Einstein from 1932,Sigmund Freud also explores the history and validity of "might versus right".[18]

Pope Francis observed that "immense inequality, injustice and acts of violence" have arisen from adoption of the principle of "might is right".[19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Definition of MIGHT MAKES/IS RIGHT".www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved2024-10-14.
  2. ^"Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words".Dictionary.com. Retrieved2024-10-14.
  3. ^"might makes right".TheFreeDictionary.com. Retrieved2024-10-14.
  4. ^abHausheer, Herman (1942). "Kratocracy". InRunes, Dagobert D. (ed.).Dictionary of Philosophy.
  5. ^White, G.E. (1973),Evolution of Reasoned Elaboration: Jurisprudential Criticism and Social Change, The, Va. L. Rev.
  6. ^Ray, J.L. (1982), "Understanding Rummel",Journal of Conflict Resolution,26:161–187,doi:10.1177/0022002782026001007,S2CID 220628906
  7. ^Thucydides (431).The Melian Dialogue.
  8. ^Plato (375). "Book 1".Plato's Republic.
  9. ^Plato (380).Gorgias.
  10. ^Wisdom 2, 10-11
  11. ^"Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 5, chapter 48".www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved2025-03-27.
  12. ^"Vae victis | Etymology of phrase vae victis by etymonline".
  13. ^Boos, Florence S."Carlyle's Conception of the Hero in Sartor Resartus and On Heroes".victorianfboos.studio.uiowa.edu. Retrieved2024-04-18.
  14. ^Ballou, Adin (1846).Christian Non-Resistance, in All Its Important Bearings, Illustrated and Defended. Philadelphia: J. Miller M'Kim. p. 119.OCLC 7335706411.
  15. ^Holzer, Harold (7 November 2006).Lincoln at Cooper Union: The Speech That Made Abraham Lincoln President. Simon and Schuster.ISBN 978-1-4165-4794-5.
  16. ^Thomas, Benjamin P. (26 September 2008).Abraham Lincoln: A Biography. SIU Press.ISBN 978-0-8093-2887-1.
  17. ^ What is art? Leo Tolstoy
  18. ^Why War? An Exchange of Letters Between Freud and Einstein(PDF). Freud Museum. 30 July 1932. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 June 2015.
  19. ^Pope Francis,Laudato si' (On Care for our Common Home), paragraph 82, published 24 May 2015, accessed 11 June 2023

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Might_makes_right&oldid=1316453077"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp