Marine microorganisms have been variously estimated to make up about 70%,[4] or about 90%,[5][6] of thebiomass in the ocean. Taken together they form themarine microbiome. Over billions of years this microbiome has evolved many life styles and adaptations and come to participate in theglobal cycling of almost all chemical elements.[7] Microorganisms are crucial to nutrient recycling inecosystems as they act asdecomposers. They are also responsible for nearly allphotosynthesis that occurs in the ocean, as well as the cycling ofcarbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and othernutrients and trace elements.[8] Marine microorganisms sequester large amounts of carbon and produce much of the world's oxygen.
A small proportion of marine microorganisms arepathogenic, causing disease and even death in marine plants and animals.[9] However marine microorganismsrecycle the majorchemical elements, both producing and consuming about half of all organic matter generated on the planet every year. As inhabitants of the largest environment on Earth, microbial marine systems drive changes in every global system.
In July 2016, scientists reported identifying a set of 355genes from thelast universal common ancestor (LUCA) of alllife on the planet, including the marine microorganisms.[10] Despite its diversity, microscopic life in the oceans is still poorly understood. For example, the role ofviruses in marine ecosystems has barely been explored even in the beginning of the 21st century.[11]
Microorganisms make up about 70% of themarine biomass.[4] Amicroorganism, or microbe, is amicroscopicorganism too small to be recognised adequately with the naked eye. In practice, that includes organisms smaller than about 0.1 mm.[12]: 13
Microorganisms are crucial to nutrient recycling inecosystems as they act asdecomposers. Some microorganisms arepathogenic, causing disease and even death in plants and animals.[9] As inhabitants of the largest environment on Earth, microbial marine systems drive changes in every global system. Microbes are responsible for virtually all thephotosynthesis that occurs in the ocean, as well as the cycling ofcarbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and othernutrients and trace elements.[8]
While recent technological developments and scientific discoveries have been substantial, we still lack a major understanding at all levels of the basic ecological questions in relation to the microorganisms in our seas and oceans. These fundamental questions are: 1. What is out there? Which microorganisms are present in our seas and oceans and in what numbersdo they occur? 2. What are they doing? What functions do each of these microorganisms perform in the marine environment and how do they contribute to the global cycles of energy and matter? 3. What are the factors that determine the presence or absence of a microorganism and how do they influence biodiversity and function and vice versa?
The range of sizes shown byprokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) andviruses relative to those of other organisms andbiomoleculesUnder a magnifier, a splash of seawater teems with microscopic life
Microscopic life undersea is diverse and still poorly understood, such as for the role ofviruses in marine ecosystems.[13] Most marine viruses arebacteriophages, which are harmless to plants and animals, but are essential to the regulation of saltwater and freshwater ecosystems.[14] They infect and destroy bacteria in aquatic microbial communities, and are the most important mechanism ofrecycling carbon in the marine environment. The organic molecules released from the dead bacterial cells stimulate fresh bacterial and algal growth.[15] Viral activity may also contribute to thebiological pump, the process wherebycarbon issequestered in the deep ocean.[16]
Sea spray containing marine microorganisms can be swept high into the atmosphere where they becomeaeroplankton, and can travel the globe before falling back to earth.
A stream of airborne microorganisms circles the planet above weather systems but below commercial air lanes.[17] Some peripatetic microorganisms are swept up from terrestrial dust storms, but most originate from marine microorganisms insea spray. In 2018, scientists reported that hundreds of millions of viruses and tens of millions of bacteria are deposited daily on every square meter around the planet.[18][19]
Microscopic organisms live throughout thebiosphere. The mass ofprokaryote microorganisms — which includes bacteria and archaea, but not the nucleatedeukaryote microorganisms — may be as much as 0.8 trillion tons of carbon (of the total biospheremass, estimated at between 1 and 4 trillion tons).[20] Single-celledbarophilic marine microbes have been found at a depth of 10,900 m (35,800 ft) in theMariana Trench, the deepest spot in the Earth's oceans.[21][22] Microorganisms live inside rocks 580 m (1,900 ft) below the sea floor under 2,590 m (8,500 ft) of ocean off the coast of the northwesternUnited States,[21][23] as well as 2,400 m (7,900 ft; 1.5 mi) beneath the seabed off Japan.[24] The greatest known temperature at which microbial life can exist is 122 °C (252 °F) (Methanopyrus kandleri).[25] In 2014, scientists confirmed the existence of microorganisms living 800 m (2,600 ft) below the ice ofAntarctica.[26][27] According to one researcher, "You can find microbes everywhere — they're extremely adaptable to conditions, and survive wherever they are."[21] Marine microorganisms serve as "the foundation of all marine food webs, recycling major elements and producing and consuming about half the organic matter generated on Earth each year".[28][29]
When not inside an infected cell or in the process of infecting a cell, viruses exist in the form of independent particles. These viral particles, also known asvirions, consist of two or three parts: (i) thegenetic material (genome) made from eitherDNA orRNA, longmolecules that carry genetic information; (ii) aprotein coat called thecapsid, which surrounds and protects the genetic material; and in some cases (iii) anenvelope oflipids that surrounds the protein coat when they are outside a cell. The shapes of these virus particles range from simplehelical andicosahedral forms for some virus species to more complex structures for others. Most virus species have virions that are too small to be seen with anoptical microscope. The average virion is about one one-hundredth the size of the averagebacterium.
The origins of viruses in theevolutionary history of life are unclear: some may haveevolved fromplasmids—pieces of DNA that can move between cells—while others may have evolved from bacteria. In evolution, viruses are an important means ofhorizontal gene transfer, which increasesgenetic diversity.[32] Viruses are considered by some to be a life form, because they carry genetic material, reproduce, and evolve throughnatural selection. However, they lack key characteristics (such as cell structure) that are generally considered necessary to count as life. Because they possess some but not all such qualities, viruses have been described as "organisms at the edge of life"[33] and as replicators.[34]
Bacteriophages (phages)
Multiple phages attached to a bacterial cell wall at 200,000x magnification
Viruses are found wherever there is life and have probably existed since living cells first evolved.[35] The origin of viruses is unclear because they do not form fossils, somolecular techniques have been used to compare the DNA or RNA of viruses and are a useful means of investigating how they arose.[36]
Viruses are now recognised as ancient and as having origins that pre-date the divergence of life into thethree domains.[37]
Opinions differ on whether viruses are a form oflife or organic structures that interact with living organisms.[34] They are considered by some to be a life form, because they carry genetic material, reproduce by creating multiple copies of themselves through self-assembly, and evolve throughnatural selection. However they lack key characteristics such as a cellular structure generally considered necessary to count as life. Because they possess some but not all such qualities, viruses have been described as replicators[34] and as "organisms at the edge of life".[33]
Bacteriophages, often just calledphages, are viruses thatparasite bacteria and archaea.Marine phages parasite marine bacteria and archaea, such ascyanobacteria.[38] They are a common and diverse group of viruses and are the most abundant biological entity in marine environments, because their hosts, bacteria, are typically the numerically dominant cellular life in the sea. Generally there are about 1 million to 10 million viruses in each mL of seawater, or about ten times more double-stranded DNA viruses than there are cellular organisms,[39][40] although estimates of viral abundance in seawater can vary over a wide range.[41][42] For a long time,tailed phages of the orderCaudovirales seemed to dominate marine ecosystems in number and diversity of organisms.[38]However, as a result of more recent research, non-tailed viruses appear to be dominant in multiple depths and oceanic regions, followed by theCaudovirales families of myoviruses, podoviruses, and siphoviruses.[43]Phages belonging to the families:Corticoviridae,[44]Inoviridae,[45]Microviridae,[46] andAutolykiviridae[47][48][49][50]are also known to infect diverse marine bacteria.
There are also archaean viruses which replicate withinarchaea: these are double-stranded DNA viruses with unusual and sometimes unique shapes.[51][52] These viruses have been studied in most detail in thethermophilic archaea, particularly the ordersSulfolobales andThermoproteales.[53]
Microorganisms make up about 70% of the marine biomass.[4] It is estimated viruses kill 20% of this biomass each day and that there are 15 times as many viruses in the oceans as there are bacteria and archaea. Viruses are the main agents responsible for the rapid destruction of harmfulalgal blooms,[40] which often kill other marine life.[54]The number of viruses in the oceans decreases further offshore and deeper into the water, where there are fewer host organisms.[16]
Viruses are an important natural means oftransferring genes between different species, which increasesgenetic diversity and drives evolution.[32] It is thought that viruses played a central role in the early evolution, before the diversification of bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes, at the time of thelast universal common ancestor of life on Earth.[55] Viruses are still one of the largest reservoirs of unexplored genetic diversity on Earth.[16]
Viruses normally range in length from about 20 to 300 nanometers. This can be contrasted with the length of bacteria, which starts at about 400 nanometers. There are alsogiant viruses, often calledgiruses, typically about 1000 nanometers (one micron) in length. All giant viruses belongtophylumNucleocytoviricota (NCLDV), together withpoxviruses.The largest known of these isTupanvirus. This genus of giant virus was discovered in 2018 in the deep ocean as well as a soda lake, and can reach up to 2.3 microns in total length.[56]
The discovery and subsequent characterization of giant viruses has triggered some debate concerning their evolutionary origins.[57] The two main hypotheses for their origin are that either they evolved from small viruses, picking up DNA from host organisms, or that they evolved from very complicated organisms into the current form which is not self-sufficient for reproduction.[58] What sort of complicated organism giant viruses might have diverged from is also a topic of debate. One proposal is that the origin point actually represents a fourthdomain of life,[59][60] but this has been largely discounted.[61][62]
Once regarded asplants constituting the classSchizomycetes, bacteria are now classified asprokaryotes. Unlike cells of animals and othereukaryotes, bacterial cells do not contain anucleus and rarely harbourmembrane-boundorganelles. Although the termbacteria traditionally included all prokaryotes, thescientific classification changed after the discovery in the 1990s that prokaryotes consist of two very different groups of organisms thatevolved from an ancient common ancestor. Theseevolutionary domains are calledBacteria andArchaea.[64]
The ancestors of modern bacteria were unicellular microorganisms that were thefirst forms of life to appear on Earth, about 4 billion years ago. For about 3 billion years, most organisms were microscopic, and bacteria and archaea were the dominant forms of life.[65][66] Although bacterialfossils exist, such asstromatolites, their lack of distinctivemorphology prevents them from being used to examine the history of bacterial evolution, or to date the time of origin of a particular bacterial species. However, gene sequences can be used to reconstruct the bacterialphylogeny, and these studies indicate that bacteria diverged first from the archaeal/eukaryotic lineage.[67] Bacteria were also involved in the second great evolutionary divergence, that of the archaea and eukaryotes. Here, eukaryotes resulted from the entering of ancient bacteria intoendosymbiotic associations with the ancestors of eukaryotic cells, which were themselves possibly related to theArchaea.[68][69] This involved the engulfment by proto-eukaryotic cells ofalphaproteobacterial symbionts to form eithermitochondria orhydrogenosomes, which are still found in all known Eukarya. Later on, some eukaryotes that already contained mitochondria also engulfed cyanobacterial-like organisms. This led to the formation ofchloroplasts in algae and plants. There are also some algae that originated from even later endosymbiotic events. Here, eukaryotes engulfed a eukaryotic algae that developed into a "second-generation" plastid.[70][71] This is known assecondary endosymbiosis.
The bacteriumMarinomonas arctica grows inside Arctic sea ice at subzero temperatures
Pelagibacter ubique and its relatives may be the most abundant organisms in the ocean, and it has been claimed that they are possibly the most abundant bacteria in the world. They make up about 25% of all microbialplankton cells, and in the summer they may account for approximately half the cells present in temperate ocean surface water. The total abundance ofP. ubique and relatives is estimated to be about 2 × 1028 microbes.[73] However, it was reported inNature in February 2013 that thebacteriophageHTVC010P, which attacksP. ubique, has been discovered and "it probably really is the commonest organism on the planet".[74][75]
The largest known bacterium, the marineThiomargarita namibiensis, can be visible to the naked eye and sometimes attains 0.75 mm (750 μm).[76][77]
Archaea were initially viewed asextremophiles living in harsh environments, such as the yellow archaea pictured here in ahot spring, but they have since been found in a much broader range ofhabitats.[78]
Archaea were initially classified asbacteria, but this classification is outdated.[80] Archaeal cells have unique properties separating them from the other two domains of life,Bacteria andEukaryota. The Archaea are further divided into multiple recognizedphyla. Classification is difficult because the majority have not been isolated in the laboratory and have only been detected by analysis of theirnucleic acids in samples from their environment.
Archaea are particularly numerous in the oceans, and the archaea inplankton may be one of the most abundant groups of organisms on the planet. Archaea are a major part of Earth's life and may play roles in both thecarbon cycle and thenitrogen cycle.Thermoproteota (also known as eocytes or Crenarchaeota) are a phylum of archaea thought to be very abundant in marine environments and one of the main contributors to the fixation of carbon.[82]
Eocytes may be the most abundant of marine archaea
Halobacteria, found in water nearly saturated with salt, are now recognised as archaea.
All living organisms can be grouped as eitherprokaryotes oreukaryotes. Life originated assingle-celled prokaryotes and later evolved into the more complex eukaryotes. In contrast to prokaryotic cells, eukaryotic cells are highly organised. Prokaryotes are the bacteria and archaea, while eukaryotes are the other life forms —protists, plants, fungi and animals. Protists are usually single-celled, while plants, fungi and animals are usuallymulti-celled.
It seems very plausible that the root of the eukaryotes lie within archaea; the closest relatives nowadays known may be theHeimdallarchaeota phylum of the proposedAsgard superphylum. This theory is a modern version of a scenario originally proposed in 1984 asEocyte hypothesis, whenThermoproteota were the closest known archaeal relatives of eukaryotes then.A possibletransitional form of microorganism between a prokaryote and a eukaryote was discovered in 2012 by Japanese scientists.Parakaryon myojinensis is a unique microorganism larger than a typical prokaryote, but with nuclear material enclosed in a membrane as in a eukaryote, and the presence ofendosymbionts. This is seen to be the first plausible evolutionary form of microorganism, showing a stage of development from the prokaryote to the eukaryote.[83][84]
Protists are eukaryotes that cannot be classified as plants, fungi or animals. They are usually single-celled and microscopic. Life originated assingle-celled prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) and later evolved intomore complex eukaryotes. Eukaryotes are the more developed life forms known as plants, animals, fungi and protists. The term protist came into use historically as a term of convenience for eukaryotes that cannot be strictly classified as plants, animals or fungi. They are not a part of modern cladistics, because they areparaphyletic (lacking a common ancestor).
Protists can be broadly divided into four groups depending on whether their nutrition is plant-like, animal-like, fungal-like,[85] or a mixture of these.[86]
Protists are highly diverse organisms currently organised into 18 phyla, but are not easy to classify.[89][90] Studies have shown high protist diversity exists in oceans, deep sea-vents and river sediments, suggesting a large number of eukaryotic microbial communities have yet to be discovered.[91][92] There has been little research onmixotrophic protists, but recent studies in marine environments found mixotrophic protests contribute a significant part of the protistbiomass.[87] Since protists are eukaryotes they possess within their cell at least onenucleus, as well asorganelles such asmitochondria andGolgi bodies. Protists are asexual but can reproduce rapidly throughmitosis or byfragmentation.
Single-celled and microscopic protists
Diatoms are a major algae group generating about 20% of world oxygen production.[93]
In contrast to the cells of prokaryotes, the cells of eukaryotes are highly organised. Plants, animals and fungi are usuallymulti-celled and are typicallymacroscopic. Most protists are single-celled and microscopic. But there are exceptions. Some single-celled marine protists are macroscopic. Some marine slime molds have unique life cycles that involve switching between unicellular,colonial, and multicellular forms.[95] Other marine protist are neither single-celled nor microscopic, such asseaweed.
Thexenophyophore, another single-celled foraminiferan, lives inabyssal zones. It has a giant shell up to 20 cm across.[97]
Giant kelp, abrown algae, is not a true plant, yet it is multicellular and can grow to 50m
Protists have been described as a taxonomic grab bag of misfits where anything that doesn't fit into one of the mainbiological kingdoms can be placed.[98] Some modern authors prefer to exclude multicellular organisms from the traditional definition of a protist, restricting protists to unicellular organisms.[99][100] This more constrained definition excludes manybrown, multicellularred andgreen algae, andslime molds.[101]
Another way of categorising protists is according to their mode of locomotion. Many unicellular protists, particularly protozoans, aremotile and cangenerate movement usingflagella,cilia orpseudopods. Cells which use flagella for movement are usually referred to asflagellates, cells which use cilia are usually referred to asciliates, and cells which use pseudopods are usually referred to asamoeba oramoeboids. Other protists arenot motile, and consequently have no movement mechanism.
Aflagellum (Latin forwhip) is a lash-like appendage that protrudes from the cell body of some protists (as well as some bacteria). Flagellates use from one to several flagella for locomotion and sometimes as feeding and sensoryorganelle.
Flagellates include bacteria as well as protists. The rotary motor model used by bacteria uses the protons of anelectrochemical gradient in order to move their flagella.Torque in the flagella of bacteria is created by particles that conduct protons around the base of the flagellum. The direction of rotation of the flagella in bacteria comes from the occupancy of the proton channels along the perimeter of the flagellar motor.[107]
Ciliates generally have hundreds to thousands of cilia that are densely packed together in arrays. During movement, an individual cilium deforms using a high-friction power stroke followed by a low-friction recovery stroke. Since there are multiple cilia packed together on an individual organism, they display collective behavior in ametachronal rhythm. This means the deformation of one cilium is in phase with the deformation of its neighbor, causing deformation waves that propagate along the surface of the organism. These propagating waves of cilia are what allow the organism to use the cilia in a coordinated manner to move. A typical example of a ciliated microorganism is theParamecium, a one-celled, ciliated protozoan covered by thousands of cilia. The cilia beating together allow theParamecium to propel through the water at speeds of 500 micrometers per second.[108]
Over 1500 species offungi are known from marine environments.[109] These are parasitic onmarine algae or animals, or aresaprobes feeding on dead organic matter from algae, corals, protozoan cysts, sea grasses, and other substrata.[110] Spores of many species have special appendages which facilitate attachment to the substratum.[111] Marine fungi can also be found insea foam and aroundhydrothermal areas of the ocean.[112] A diverse range of unusual secondarymetabolites is produced by marine fungi.[113]
A typical milliliter of seawater contains about 103 to 104 fungal cells.[119] This number is greater in coastal ecosystems andestuaries due to nutritional runoff from terrestrial communities. A higher diversity of mycoplankton is found around coasts and in surface waters down to 1000 metres, with avertical profile that depends on how abundantphytoplankton is.[120][121] This profile changes between seasons due to changes in nutrient availability.[122] Marine fungi survive in a constant oxygen deficient environment, and therefore depend on oxygen diffusion byturbulence and oxygen generated byphotosynthetic organisms.[123]
Lichens aremutualistic associations between a fungus, usually anascomycete, and an alga or acyanobacterium. Several lichens are found in marine environments.[124] Many more occur in thesplash zone, where they occupy different vertical zones depending on how tolerant they are to submersion.[125] Some lichens live a long time; one species has been dated at 8,600 years.[126] However their lifespan is difficult to measure because what defines the same lichen is not precise.[127] Lichens grow by vegetatively breaking off a piece, which may or may not be defined as the same lichen, and two lichens of different ages can merge, raising the issue of whether it is the same lichen.[127]
Thesea snailLittoraria irrorata damages plants ofSpartina in the sea marshes where it lives, which enables spores of intertidal ascomycetous fungi to colonise the plant. The snail then eats the fungal growth in preference to the grass itself.[128]
According to fossil records, fungi date back to the lateProterozoic era 900-570 million years ago. Fossil marine lichens 600 million years old have been discovered in China.[129] It has been hypothesized that mycoplankton evolved from terrestrial fungi, likely in thePaleozoic era (390 million years ago).[130]
As juveniles, animals develop from microscopic stages, which can includespores,eggs andlarvae. At least one microscopic animal group, theparasiticcnidarianMyxozoa, is unicellular in its adult form, and includes marine species. Other adult marinemicroanimals are multicellular. Microscopic adultarthropods are more commonly found inland in freshwater, but there are marine species as well. Microscopic adult marinecrustaceans include somecopepods,cladocera andtardigrades (water bears). Some marinenematodes androtifers are also too small to be recognised with the naked eye, as are manyloricifera, including the recently discoveredanaerobic species that spend their lives in ananoxic environment.[131][132] Copepods contribute more to thesecondary productivity andcarbon sink of the world oceans than any other group of organisms.
Composite image showing the global distribution of photosynthesis, including both oceanicphytoplankton and terrestrialvegetation. Dark red and blue-green indicate regions of high photosynthetic activity in the ocean and on land, respectively.
Primary producers are theautotroph organisms that make their own food instead of eating other organisms. This means primary producers become the starting point in thefood chain forheterotroph organisms that do eat other organisms. Some marine primary producers are specialised bacteria and archaea which arechemotrophs, making their own food by gathering aroundhydrothermal vents andcold seeps and usingchemosynthesis. However most marineprimary production comes from organisms which usephotosynthesis on the carbon dioxide dissolved in the water. This process uses energy from sunlight to convert water andcarbon dioxide[133]: 186–187 into sugars that can be used both as a source of chemical energy and of organic molecules that are used in the structural components of cells.[133]: 1242 Marine primary producers are important because they underpin almost all marine animal life by generating most of theoxygen and food that provide other organisms with the chemical energy they need to exist.
The principal marine primary producers arecyanobacteria,algae and marine plants. Theoxygen released as a by-product of photosynthesis is needed bynearly all living things to carry outcellular respiration. In addition, primary producers are influential in the globalcarbon andwater cycles. They stabilize coastal areas and can provide habitats for marine animals. The termdivision has been traditionally used instead ofphylum when discussing primary producers, but theInternational Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants now accepts both terms as equivalents.[134]
Cyanobacteria were the first organisms to evolve an ability to turn sunlight into chemical energy. They form a phylum (division) of bacteria which range from unicellular tofilamentous and includecolonial species. They are found almost everywhere on earth: in damp soil, in both freshwater and marine environments, and even on Antarctic rocks.[136] In particular, some species occur as drifting cells floating in the ocean, and as such were amongst the first of thephytoplankton.
The first primary producers that used photosynthesis were oceaniccyanobacteria about 2.3 billion years ago.[137][138] The release of molecularoxygen bycyanobacteria as a by-product of photosynthesis induced global changes in the Earth's environment. Because oxygen was toxic to most life on Earth at the time, this led to the near-extinction ofoxygen-intolerant organisms, adramatic change which redirected the evolution of the major animal and plant species.[139]
The tiny (0.6μm) marine cyanobacteriumProchlorococcus, discovered in 1986, forms today an important part of the base of the oceanfood chain and accounts for much of the photosynthesis of the open ocean[140] and an estimated 20% of the oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere.[141] It is possibly the most plentiful genus on Earth: a single millilitre of surface seawater may contain 100,000 cells or more.[142]
Originally, biologists thoughtcyanobacteria was algae, and referred to it as "blue-green algae". The more recent view is that cyanobacteria are bacteria, and hence are not even in the sameKingdom as algae. Most authorities exclude allprokaryotes, and hence cyanobacteria from the definition of algae.[143][144]
Dinoflagellates and diatoms are important components of marine algae and have their own sections below.Euglenophytes are a phylum of unicellular flagellates with only a few marine members.
Not all algae are microscopic. Green, red and brown algae all have multicellular macroscopic forms that make up the familiarseaweeds.Green algae, an informal group, contains about 8,000 recognised species.[145] Many species live most of their lives as single cells or are filamentous, while others formcolonies made up from long chains of cells, or are highly differentiated macroscopic seaweeds.Red algae, a (disputed) phylum contains about 7,000 recognised species,[146] mostlymulticellular and including many notable seaweeds.[146][147]Brown algae form aclass containing about 2,000 recognised species,[148] mostlymulticellular and including many seaweeds such askelp.Unlike higher plants, algae lack roots, stems, or leaves. They can be classified by size asmicroalgae ormacroalgae.
Microalgae are the microscopic types of algae, not visible to the naked eye. They are mostlyunicellular species which exist as individuals or in chains or groups, though some aremulticellular. Microalgae are important components of the marine protistsdiscussed above, as well as the phytoplanktondiscussed below. They are verydiverse. It has been estimated there are 200,000-800,000 species of which about 50,000 species have been described.[149] Depending on the species, their sizes range from a few micrometers (μm) to a few hundred micrometers. They are specially adapted to an environment dominated by viscous forces.
Unicellular organisms are usually microscopic. There are exceptions.Mermaid's wineglass, a genus of subtropicalgreen algae, is single-celled but remarkably large and complex in form with a single large nucleus, making it a model organism for studyingcell biology.[150] Another single-celled algae,Caulerpa taxifolia, has the appearance of a vascular plant including "leaves" arranged neatly up stalks like a fern. Selective breeding in aquariums to produce hardier strains resulted in an accidental release into the Mediterranean where it has become aninvasive species known colloquially askiller algae.[151]
Chlamydomonas globosa, a unicellular green alga with twoflagella just visible at bottom left
Macroalgae are the larger,multicellular and more visible types of algae, commonly calledseaweeds. Seaweeds usually grow in shallow coastal waters where they are anchored to the seafloor by aholdfast. Like microalgae, macroalgae (seaweeds) can be regarded asmarine protists since they are not true plants. But they are not microorganisms, so they are not within the scope of this article.
Plankton are drifting or floating organisms that cannot swim effectively against a current, and include organisms from most areas of life:bacteria,archaea,algae,protozoa andanimals. Red, orange, yellow and green represent areas where algal blooms abound. Blue areas represent nutrient-poor zones where phytoplankton exist in lower concentrations.
Plankton (from Greek forwanderers) are a diverse group of organisms that live in thewater column of large bodies of water but cannot swim against a current. As a result, they wander or drift with the currents.[153] Plankton are defined by theirecological niche, not by anyphylogenetic ortaxonomic classification. They are a crucial source of food for many marine animals, fromforage fish towhales. Plankton can be divided into a plant-like component and an animal component.
Phytoplankton – such as this colony ofChaetoceros socialis – naturally gives off red fluorescent light which dissipates excess solar energy they cannot consume through photosynthesis. This glow can be detected by satellites as an indicator of how efficiently ocean phytoplankton is photosynthesising.[154][155]
Phytoplankton are the plant-like components of the plankton community ("phyto" comes from the Greek forplant). They areautotrophic (self-feeding), meaning they generate their own food and do not need to consume other organisms.
Phytoplankton perform three crucial functions: they generate nearly half of the world atmospheric oxygen, they regulate ocean and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and they form the base of the marinefood web. When conditions are right,blooms of phytoplankton algae can occur in surface waters. Phytoplankton arer-strategists which grow rapidly and can double their population every day. The blooms can become toxic and deplete the water of oxygen. However, phytoplankton numbers are usually kept in check by the phytoplankton exhausting available nutrients and by grazing zooplankton.[156]
Diatoms form a (disputed) phylum containing about 100,000 recognised species of mainly unicellular algae. Diatoms generate about 20 per cent of the oxygen produced on the planet each year,[93] take in over 6.7 billion metric tons ofsilicon each year from the waters in which they live,[159] and contribute nearly half of the organic material found in the oceans.
Diatoms are one of the most common types of phytoplankton
Their protective shells (frustles) are made of silicon
Diatoms have asilica shell (frustule) with radial (centric) or bilateral (pennate) symmetry
Diatoms are enclosed in protective silica (glass) shells calledfrustules. Each frustule is made from two interlocking parts covered with tiny holes through which the diatom exchanges nutrients and wastes.[156] The frustules of dead diatoms drift to the ocean floor where, over millions of years, they can build up as much ashalf a mile deep.[160]
Silicified frustule of a pennate diatom with two overlapping halves
Guinardia delicatula, a diatom responsible foralgal blooms in the North Sea and the English Channel[161]
Fossil diatom
There are over 100,000 species ofdiatoms which account for 50% of the ocean's primary production
Coccolithophores are minute unicellular photosynthetic protists with two flagella for locomotion. Most of them are protected by a shell covered with ornate circular plates or scales calledcoccoliths. The coccoliths are made from calcium carbonate. The calcite shells are important to the marine carbon cycle.[163] The term coccolithophore derives from the Greek for aseed carrying stone, referring to their small size and the coccolith stones they carry. Under the right conditions they bloom, like other phytoplankton, and can turn the ocean milky white.[164]
Model of the energy generating mechanism in marine bacteria
(1) When sunlight strikes a rhodopsin molecule (2) it changes its configuration so a proton is expelled from the cell (3) the chemical potential causes the proton to flow back to the cell (4) thus generating energy (5) in the form ofadenosine triphosphate.[165]
Phototrophic metabolism relies on one of three energy-converting pigments:chlorophyll,bacteriochlorophyll, andretinal. Retinal is thechromophore found inrhodopsins. The significance of chlorophyll in converting light energy has been written about for decades, but phototrophy based on retinal pigments is just beginning to be studied.[166]
In 2000 a team of microbiologists led byEdward DeLong made a crucial discovery in the understanding of the marine carbon and energy cycles. They discovered a gene in several species of bacteria[168][169] responsible for production of the proteinrhodopsin, previously unheard of in bacteria. These proteins found in the cell membranes are capable of converting light energy to biochemical energy due to a change in configuration of the rhodopsin molecule as sunlight strikes it, causing the pumping of aproton from inside out and a subsequent inflow that generates the energy.[170] The archaeal-like rhodopsins have subsequently been found among different taxa, protists as well as in bacteria and archaea, though they are rare in complexmulticellular organisms.[171][172][173]
Research in 2019 shows these "sun-snatching bacteria" are more widespread than previously thought and could change how oceans are affected by global warming. "The findings break from the traditional interpretation of marine ecology found in textbooks, which states that nearly all sunlight in the ocean is captured by chlorophyll in algae. Instead, rhodopsin-equipped bacteria function like hybrid cars, powered by organic matter when available — as most bacteria are — and by sunlight when nutrients are scarce."[174][166]
There is anastrobiological conjecture called thePurple Earth hypothesis which surmises that original life forms on Earth were retinal-based rather than chlorophyll-based, which would have made the Earth appear purple instead of green.[175][176]
During the 1930sAlfred C. Redfield found similarities between the composition of elements in phytoplankton and the major dissolved nutrients in the deep ocean.[177] Redfield proposed that the ratio of carbon to nitrogen to phosphorus (106:16:1) in the ocean was controlled by the phytoplankton's requirements, as phytoplankton subsequently release nitrogen and phosphorus as they remineralize. This ratio has become known as theRedfield ratio, and is used as a fundamental principle in describing thestoichiometry of seawater and phytoplankton evolution.[178]
However, the Redfield ratio is not a universal value and can change with things like geographical latitude.[179] Based on allocation of resources, phytoplankton can be classified into three different growth strategies: survivalist, bloomer and generalist. Survivalist phytoplankton has a high N:P ratio (>30) and contains an abundance of resource-acquisition machinery to sustain growth under scarce resources. Bloomer phytoplankton has a low N:P ratio (<10), contains a high proportion of growth machinery and is adapted to exponential growth. Generalist phytoplankton has similar N:P to the Redfield ratio and contain relatively equal resource-acquisition and growth machinery.[178]
Thef-ratio is the fraction of totalprimary production fuelled bynitrate (as opposed to that fuelled by othernitrogencompounds such asammonium). The ratio was originally defined by Richard Eppley and Bruce Peterson in one of the firstpapers estimating global oceanic production.[180]
Zooplankton are the animal component of the planktonic community ("zoo" comes from the Greek foranimal). They areheterotrophic (other-feeding), meaning they cannot produce their own food and must consume instead other plants or animals as food. In particular, this means they eat phytoplankton.
Radiolarians are unicellular predatoryprotists encased in elaborate globular shells usually made of silica and pierced with holes. Their name comes from the Latin for "radius". They catch prey by extending parts of their body through the holes. As with the silica frustules of diatoms, radiolarian shells can sink to the ocean floor when radiolarians die and become preserved as part of theocean sediment. These remains, asmicrofossils, provide valuable information about past oceanic conditions.[185]
Like diatoms, radiolarians come in many shapes
Also like diatoms, radiolarian shells are usually made of silicate
Like radiolarians,foraminiferans (forams for short) are single-celled predatory protists, also protected with shells that have holes in them. Their name comes from the Latin for "hole bearers". Their shells, often calledtests, are chambered (forams add more chambers as they grow). The shells are usually made of calcite, but are sometimes made ofagglutinated sediment particles orchiton, and (rarely) of silica. Most forams are benthic, but about 40 species are planktic.[187] They are widely researched with well established fossil records which allow scientists to infer a lot about past environments and climates.[185]
Foraminiferans
...can have more than one nucleus
...and defensive spines
Foraminiferans are important unicellular zooplanktonprotists, with calcium tests
Amixotroph is an organism that can use a mix of differentsources of energy and carbon, instead of having a single trophic mode on the continuum from completeautotrophy at one end toheterotrophy at the other. It is estimated that mixotrophs comprise more than half of all microscopic plankton.[192] There are two types of eukaryotic mixotrophs: those with their ownchloroplasts, and those withendosymbionts—and others that acquire them throughkleptoplasty or by enslaving the entire phototrophic cell.[193]
The distinction between plants and animals often breaks down in very small organisms. Possible combinations arephoto- andchemotrophy,litho- andorganotrophy,auto- andheterotrophy or other combinations of these. Mixotrophs can be eithereukaryotic orprokaryotic.[194] They can take advantage of different environmental conditions.[195]
Recent studies of marine microzooplankton found 30–45% of the ciliate abundance was mixotrophic, and up to 65% of the amoeboid, foram and radiolarianbiomass was mixotrophic.[87]
Phaeocystis is an important algal genus found as part of the marinephytoplankton around the world. It has apolymorphic life cycle, ranging from free-living cells to large colonies.[196] It has the ability to form floating colonies, where hundreds of cells are embedded in a gel matrix, which can increase massively in size duringblooms.[197] As a result,Phaeocystis is an important contributor to the marinecarbon[198] andsulfur cycles.[199]Phaeocystis species are endosymbionts toacantharian radiolarians.[200][201]
Mixotrophic plankton that combine phototrophy and heterotrophy – table based on Stoecker et al., 2017[202]
Calledconstitutive mixotrophs by Mitra et al., 2016.[203] Phytoplankton that eat: photosynthetic protists with inheritedplastids and the capacity to ingest prey.
Callednonconstitutive mixotrophs by Mitra et al., 2016.[203] Zooplankton that are photosynthetic: microzooplankton or metazoan zooplankton that acquire phototrophy through chloroplast retentiona or maintenance of algal endosymbionts.
Generalists
Protists that retain chloroplasts and rarely other organelles from many algal taxa
Dinoflagellates are part of thealgae group, and form a phylum of unicellular flagellates with about 2,000 marine species.[204] The name comes from the Greek "dinos" meaningwhirling and the Latin "flagellum" meaning awhip orlash. This refers to the two whip-like attachments (flagella) used for forward movement. Most dinoflagellates are protected with red-brown, cellulose armour. Like other phytoplankton, dinoflagellates arer-strategists which under right conditions canbloom and createred tides.Excavates may be the most basal flagellate lineage.[102]
By trophic orientation dinoflagellates cannot be uniformly categorized. Some dinoflagellates are known to bephotosynthetic, but a large fraction of these are in factmixotrophic, combining photosynthesis with ingestion of prey (phagotrophy).[205] Some species areendosymbionts of marine animals and other protists, and play an important part in the biology ofcoral reefs. Others predate other protozoa, and a few forms are parasitic. Many dinoflagellates aremixotrophic and could also be classified as phytoplankton.
The toxic dinoflagellateDinophysis acuta acquire chloroplasts from its prey. "It cannot catch the cryptophytes by itself, and instead relies on ingesting ciliates such as the redMyrionecta rubra, which sequester their chloroplasts from a specific cryptophyte clade (Geminigera/Plagioselmis/Teleaulax)".[202]
Gyrodinium, one of the few naked dinoflagellates which lack armour
The dinoflagellateProtoperidinium extrudes a large feeding veil to capture prey
Nassellarian radiolarians can be in symbiosis with dinoflagellates
The dinoflagellateDinophysis acuta
Asurf wave at night sparkles with blue light due to the presence of a bioluminescent dinoflagellate, such asLingulodinium polyedrum
Traditionally dinoflagellates have been presented as armoured or unarmoured
Dinoflagellates often live insymbiosis with other organisms. Manynassellarian radiolarians housedinoflagellatesymbionts within their tests.[207] The nassellarian providesammonium andcarbon dioxide for the dinoflagellate, while the dinoflagellate provides the nassellarian with a mucous membrane useful for hunting and protection against harmful invaders.[208] There is evidence fromDNA analysis that dinoflagellate symbiosis with radiolarians evolved independently from other dinoflagellate symbioses, such as withforaminifera.[209]
Some dinoflagellates arebioluminescent. At night, ocean water can light up internally andsparkle with blue light because of these dinoflagellates.[210][211] Bioluminescent dinoflagellates possessscintillons, individualcytoplasmic bodies which containdinoflagellate luciferase, the main enzyme involved in the luminescence. The luminescence, sometimes calledthe phosphorescence of the sea, occurs as brief (0.1 sec) blue flashes or sparks when individual scintillons are stimulated, usually by mechanical disturbances from, for example, a boat or a swimmer or surf.[212]
Stone dagger ofÖtzi the Iceman who lived during theCopper Age. The blade is made ofchert containing radiolarians, calcispheres, calpionellids and a few sponge spicules. The presence ofcalpionellids, which are extinct, was used to date this dagger.[216]
Sediments at the bottom of the ocean have two main origins, terrigenous and biogenous.
Terrigenous sediments account for about 45% of the total marine sediment, and originate in the erosion ofrocks on land, transported by rivers and land runoff, windborne dust, volcanoes, or grinding by glaciers.
Biogenous sediments account for the other 55% of the total sediment, and originate in the skeletal remains ofmarine protists (single-celled plankton and benthos microorganisms). Much smaller amounts of precipitated minerals and meteoric dust can also be present.Ooze, in the context of a marine sediment, does not refer to the consistency of the sediment but to its biological origin. The term ooze was originally used byJohn Murray, the "father of modern oceanography", who proposed the termradiolarian ooze for the silica deposits of radiolarian shells brought to the surface during theChallenger expedition.[217] Abiogenic ooze is apelagic sediment containing at least 30 per cent from the skeletal remains of marine organisms.
Coccolithophores are the largest global source of biogenic calcium carbonate, and significantly contribute to the global carbon cycle.[221] They are the main constituent of chalk deposits such as thewhite cliffs of Dover.
Distribution of sediment types on the seafloor Within each colored area, the type of material shown is what dominates, although other materials are also likely to be present. For further information,see here
Marine microbenthos are microorganisms that live in thebenthic zone of the ocean – that live near or on the seafloor, or within or on surface seafloor sediments. The wordbenthos comes from Greek, meaning "depth of the sea". Microbenthos are found everywhere on or about the seafloor of continental shelves, as well as in deeper waters, with greater diversity in or on seafloor sediments. In shallow waters,seagrass meadows, coral reefs and kelp forests provide particularly rich habitats. Inphotic zones benthic diatoms dominate as photosynthetic organisms. Inintertidal zones changingtides strongly control opportunities for microbenthos.
Elphidium a widespread abundant genus of benthic forams
Both foraminifera and diatoms haveplanktonic andbenthic forms, that is, they can drift in thewater column or live on sediment at the bottom of the ocean. Either way, their shells end up on the seafloor after they die. These shells are widely used asclimate proxies. The chemical composition of the shells are a consequence of the chemical composition of the ocean at the time the shells were formed. Past water temperatures can be also be inferred from the ratios of stableoxygen isotopes in the shells, since lighter isotopes evaporate more readily in warmer water leaving the heavier isotopes in the shells. Information about past climates can be inferred further from the abundance of forams and diatoms, since they tend to be more abundant in warm water.[223]
The suddenextinction event which killed the dinosaurs 66 million years ago also rendered extinct three-quarters of all other animal and plant species. However, deep-sea benthic forams flourished in the aftermath. In 2020 it was reported that researchers have examined the chemical composition of thousands of samples of these benthic forams and used their findings to build the most detailed climate record of Earth ever.[224][225]
Someendoliths have extremely long lives. In 2013 researchers reported evidence of endoliths in the ocean floor, perhaps millions of years old, with a generation time of 10,000 years.[226] These are slowly metabolizing and not in a dormant state. SomeActinomycetota found inSiberia are estimated to be half a million years old.[227][228][229]
(A) Microbial interactions range from mutually beneficial to harmful for one or more partners. Blue double headed arrows highlight that relationships can move between classifications often influenced by environmental conditions. (B) Host-microbe symbioses should be considered within the context of microbial communities where the host participates in multiple and often different symbiotic relationships. (C) Microbial communities are influenced by a variety of microbe-microbe symbioses ranging from cooperation (e.g., syntrophy or co-metabolism) to competition. Arrows depict generally beneficial (blue) and detrimental (red) outcomes for one (single arrowhead) or both (double arrowhead) members. Note as with host-microbe symbioses these relationships can be viewed as fluid and influenced by environmental conditions.[230]
The concept of the holobiont was initially defined byDr. Lynn Margulis in her 1991 bookSymbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation as an assemblage of ahost and the many other species living in or around it, which together form a discreteecological unit.[231] The components of a holobiont are individual species orbionts, while the combinedgenome of all bionts is thehologenome.[232]
The concept has subsequently evolved since this original definition,[233] with the focus moving to the microbial species associated with the host. Thus the holobiont includes the host,virome,microbiome, and other members, all of which contribute in some way to the function of the whole.[234][235] A holobiont typically includes aeukaryotehost and all of thesymbioticviruses,bacteria,fungi, etc. that live on or inside it.[236]
However, there iscontroversy over whether holobionts can be viewed as single evolutionary units.[237]
Marine microorganisms play central roles in themarine food web.
Theviral shunt pathway is a mechanism that prevents marine microbialparticulate organic matter (POM) from migrating uptrophic levels by recycling them intodissolved organic matter (DOM), which can be readily taken up by microorganisms.[244] Viral shunting helps maintain diversity within the microbial ecosystem by preventing a single species of marine microbe from dominating the micro-environment.[245] The DOM recycled by the viral shunt pathway is comparable to the amount generated by the other main sources of marine DOM.[246]
Sea ice microbial communities (SIMCO) refer to groups ofmicroorganisms living within and at the interfaces ofsea ice at the poles. The ice matrix they inhabit has strong vertical gradients of salinity, light, temperature and nutrients. Sea ice chemistry is most influenced by the salinity of the brine which affects thepH and the concentration of dissolved nutrients and gases. Thebrine formed during the melting sea ice creates pores and channels in the sea ice in which these microbes can live. As a result of these gradients and dynamic conditions, a higher abundance of microbes are found in the lower layer of the ice, although some are found in the middle and upper layers.[251]
Hydrothermal vents are located where thetectonic plates are moving apart and spreading. This allows water from the ocean to enter into the crust of the earth where it is heated by the magma. The increasing pressure and temperature forces the water back out of these openings, on the way out, the water accumulates dissolved minerals and chemicals from the rocks that it encounters. Vents can be characterized by temperature and chemical composition asdiffuse vents which release clear relatively cool water usually below 30 °C, aswhite smokers which emit milky coloured water at warmer temperatures, about 200-330 °C, and asblack smokers which emit water darkened by accumulated precipitates of sulfide at hot temperatures, about 300-400 °C.[252]
Hydrothermal vent microbial communities are microscopic unicellular organisms that live and reproduce in the chemically distinct area around hydrothermal vents. These include organisms inmicrobial mats, free floating cells, and bacteria inendosymbiotic relationships with animals. Because there is no sunlight at these depths, energy is provided bychemosynthesis where symbiotic bacteria and archaea form the bottom of the food chain and are able to support a variety of organisms such asgiant tube worms andPompeii worms. These organisms utilize this symbiotic relationship in order to utilize and obtain the chemical energy that is released at these hydrothermal vent areas.[253]Chemolithoautotrophic bacteria can derive nutrients and energy from the geological activity at a hydrothermal vent to fix carbon into organic forms.[254]
Viruses are also a part of the hydrothermal vent microbial community and their influence on the microbial ecology in these ecosystems is a burgeoning field of research.[255] Viruses are the most abundant life in the ocean, harboring the greatest reservoir of genetic diversity.[256] As their infections are often fatal, they constitute a significant source of mortality and thus have widespread influence on biological oceanographic processes,evolution andbiogeochemical cycling within the ocean.[257] Evidence has been found however to indicate that viruses found in vent habitats have adopted a moremutualistic thanparasitic evolutionary strategy in order to survive the extreme and volatile environment they exist in.[258] Deep-sea hydrothermal vents were found to have high numbers of viruses indicating high viral production.[259] Like in other marine environments,deep-sea hydrothermal viruses affect abundance and diversity ofprokaryotes and therefore impact microbial biogeochemical cycling bylysing their hosts to replicate.[260] However, in contrast to their role as a source of mortality and population control, viruses have also been postulated to enhance survival of prokaryotes in extreme environments, acting as reservoirs of genetic information. The interactions of the virosphere with microorganisms under environmental stresses is therefore thought to aide microorganism survival through dispersal of host genes throughhorizontal gene transfer.[261]
Fluorescence microscopy of variouspicoplankton in the ocean, much of which cannot be effectively studied because they resist attempts at laboratory culture
Thedeep biosphere is that part of thebiosphere that resides below the first few meters of the surface. It extends at least 5 kilometers below the continental surface and 10.5 kilometers below the sea surface, with temperatures that may exceed 100 °C.
Above the surface living organisms consume organic matter and oxygen. Lower down, these are not available, so they make use of "edibles" (electron donors) such as hydrogen released from rocks by various chemical processes, methane, reduced sulfur compounds and ammonium. They "breathe"electron acceptors such as nitrates and nitrites, manganese and iron oxides, oxidized sulfur compounds and carbon dioxide.
There is very little energy at greater depths, and metabolism can be up to a million times slower than at the surface. Cells may live for thousands of years before dividing and there is no known limit to their age. The subsurface accounts for about 90% of thebiomass in bacteria and archaea, and 15% of the total biomass for the biosphere. Eukaryotes are also found, mostly microscopic, but including some multicellular life. Viruses are also present and infect the microbes.
Subsurface life environments
In 2018, researchers from theDeep Carbon Observatory announced thatlife forms, including 70% of the bacteria and archaea on Earth, totaling a biomass of 23 billion tonnescarbon, live up to4.8 km (3.0 mi) deep underground, including2.5 km (1.6 mi) below the seabed.[262][263][264] In 2019 microbial organisms were discovered living 7,900 feet (2,400 m) below the surface,breathing sulfur and eating rocks such aspyrite as their regular food source.[265][266][267] This discovery occurred in the oldest known water on Earth.[268]
These aerobic microorganisms, found deep in organically poor sediments, have been in quasi-suspended animation for maybe 100 million years
To date biologists have been unable toculture in the laboratory the vast majority of microorganisms. This applies particularly to bacteria and archaea, and is due to a lack of knowledge or ability to supply the required growth conditions.[271][272] The termmicrobial dark matter has come to be used to describe microorganisms scientists know are there but have been unable to culture, and whose properties therefore remain elusive.[271] Microbial dark matter is unrelated to thedark matter of physics and cosmology, but is so-called for the difficulty in effectively studying it. It is hard to estimate its relative magnitude, but the accepted gross estimate is that less than one per cent of microbial species in a givenecological niche is culturable. In recent years effort is being put to decipher more of the microbial dark matter by means of learning theirgenomeDNA sequence from environmental samples[273] and then by gaining insights to their metabolism from their sequenced genome, promoting the knowledge required for their cultivation.
Estimates of microbial species counts in the three domains of life
Bacteria are the oldest and most biodiverse group, followed by Archaea and Fungi (the most recent groups). In 1998, before awareness of the extent of microbial life had gotten underway,Robert M. May[274] estimated there were 3 million species of living organisms on the planet. But in 2016, Locey and Lennon[275] estimated the number of microorganism species could be as high as 1 trillion.[276]
Microbial diversity
Comparative representation of the known and estimated (small box) and the yet unknown (large box) microbial diversity, which applies to both marine and terrestrial microorganisms. The text boxes refer to factors that adversely affect the knowledge of the microbial diversity that exists on the planet.[276]
Strategies for sampling plankton by size classes and abundance The blue background indicates the filtered volume required to obtain sufficient organism numbers for analysis. Actual volumes from which organisms are sampled are always recorded.[277]
Traditionally, thephylogeny of microorganisms was inferred and theirtaxonomy was established based on studies ofmorphology. However, developments inmolecular phylogenetics have allowed evolutionary relationship of species to be established by analyzing deeper characteristics, such as theirDNA andprotein sequences, for exampleribosomal DNA.[278] The lack of easily accessible morphological features, such as those present inanimals andplants, particularly hampered early efforts at classifying bacteria and archaea. This resulted in erroneous, distorted and confused classification, an example of which, notedCarl Woese, isPseudomonas whose etymology ironically matched its taxonomy, namely "false unit".[279] Many bacterial taxa have been reclassified or redefined using molecular phylogenetics.
Marinomonas arctica, a bacterium which grows inside Arctic sea ice at subzero temperatures
It would be difficult to consistently separate out these two microbes using images alone. However, if their barcodes are aligned to each other and their bases are coloured to see them more clearly, it becomes easy to see which bases are different between these two microbes. In this manner, millions of different kinds of microbes can be distinguished.[280]
DNA barcode alignment and comparison between the two species of marine bacteria pictured above[280]
Methods used to study phytoplankton
Three different possibilities to process the sample are using raw samples, fixation or preservation, and filtration. For microscopy and flow cytometry raw samples either are measured immediately or have to be fixed for later measurements. Since molecular methods, pigment analysis and detection of molecular tracers usually require concentrated cells, filter residues serve for phytoplankton measurements. Molecular characterization and quantification of trace molecules is performed usingchromatography,mass spectrometry, andnuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.[281]
Recent developments inmolecular sequencing have allowed for the recovery ofgenomesin situ, directly from environmental samples and avoiding the need for culturing. This has led for example, to a rapid expansion in knowledge of the diversity ofbacterial phyla. These techniques are genome-resolvedmetagenomics andsingle-cell genomics.
The new sequencing technologies and the accumulation of sequence data have resulted in a paradigm shift, highlighted both the ubiquity of microbial communities in association within higher organisms and the critical roles of microbes in ecosystem health.[283] These new possibilities have revolutionizedmicrobial ecology, because the analysis of genomes and metagenomes in a high-throughput manner provides efficient methods for addressing the functional potential of individual microorganisms as well as of whole communities in their natural habitats.[284][285][286]
DNA sequencing technologies used in marine metagenomics
The discovery process involves marine sampling,DNA sequencing andcontig generation. Previously unknown genes, pathways and even whole genomes are being discovered. These genome-editing technologies are used to retrieve and modify valuable microorganisms for production, particularly in marine metagenomics. Organisms may be cultivable or uncultivable.Metagenomics is providing especially valuable information for uncultivable samples.[287]
Omics is a term used informally to refer to branches ofbiology whose names end in the suffix-omics, such asgenomics,proteomics,metabolomics, andglycomics.Marine Omics has recently emerged as a field of research of its own.[288] Omics aims at collectively characterising and quantifying pools of biological molecules that translate into the structure, function, and dynamics of an organism or organisms. For example,functional genomics aims at identifying the functions of as many genes as possible of a given organism. It combines different-omics techniques such as transcriptomics and proteomics with saturatedmutant collections.[289][290]
Many omes beyond the originalgenome have become useful and have been widely adopted in recent years by research scientists. The suffix-omics can provide an easy shorthand to encapsulate a field; for example, aninteractomics study is reasonably recognisable as relating to large-scale analyses of gene-gene, protein-protein, or protein-ligand interactions, whileproteomics has become established as a term for studyingproteins on a large scale.
Any given omics technique, used just by itself, cannot adequately disentangle the intricacies of a hostmicrobiome. Multi-omics approaches are needed to satisfactorily unravel the complexities of the host-microbiome interactions.[291] For instance,metagenomics,metatranscriptomics,metaproteomics andmetabolomics methods are all used to provide information on themetagenome.[292]
Meta-omics data based biogeochemical modeling[293]
A schematic conceptual framework formarine biogeochemical modeling from environmental, imaging, and meta-omics data.[294] A semi-automatic computational pipeline is schematized for combining biomarkers with biogeochemical data[295] that can be incorporated into classic biogeochemical models[296] for creating a next generation of biogeochemical trait-based meta-omics models by considering their respective traits. Such novel meta-omics-enabled approaches aim to improve the monitoring and prediction of ocean processes while respecting the complexity of the planktonic system.[297][298]
As an example of how omics data can be used with marine phytoplankton to informEarth system science,metatranscriptome sequences from natural phytoplankton communities were used to help identify physiological traits (cellular concentration ofribosomes and theirrRNAs) underpinning adaptation to environmental conditions (temperature). A mechanistic phytoplankton cell model was used to test the significance of the identified physiological trait for cellularstoichiometry. Environmental selection in a trait‐based global marine ecosystem model was then linking emergent growth and cellular allocation strategies to large‐scale patterns in light, nutrients and temperature in the surface marine environment. Global predictions of cellular resource allocation and stoichiometry (N:P ratio) were consistent with patterns in metatranscriptome data[300] and latitudinal patterns in the elemental ratios of marine plankton and organic matter.[301] The three‐dimensional view of ribosome shows rRNA in dark blue and dark red. Lighter colours representribosomal proteins. Bands above show temperature‐dependent abundance of theeukaryotic ribosomal protein S14.[300]
Microorganisms and climate change in marine and terrestrial biomes[6]
In marine environments, microbialprimary production contributes substantially toCO2 sequestration. Marine microorganisms also recycle nutrients for use in themarine food web and in the process release CO2 to the atmosphere. Microbial biomass and other organic matter (remnants of plants and animals) are converted to fossil fuels over millions of years. By contrast, burning offossil fuels liberates greenhouse gases in a small fraction of that time. As a result, thecarbon cycle is out of balance, and atmospheric CO2 levels will continue to rise as long as fossil fuels continue to be burnt.[6]
Microorganisms have key roles in carbon and nutrient cycling, animal (including human) and plant health, agriculture and the global food web. Microorganisms live in all environments on Earth that are occupied by macroscopic organisms, and they are the sole life forms in other environments, such as the deep subsurface and ‘extreme’ environments. Microorganisms date back to the origin of life on Earth at least 3.8 billion years ago, and they will likely exist well beyond any future extinction events... Unless we appreciate the importance of microbial processes, we fundamentally limit our understanding of Earth's biosphere and response to climate change and thus jeopardize efforts to create an environmentally sustainable future.[6]
Marine microorganisms known as cyanobacteria first emerged in the oceans during thePrecambrian era roughly 2 billion years ago. Over eons, the photosynthesis of marine microorganisms generated by oxygen has helped shape the chemical environment in the evolution of plants, animals and many other life forms. Marine microorganisms were first observed in 1675 by Dutch lensmakerAntonie van Leeuwenhoek.
^abRybicki EP (1990). "The classification of organisms at the edge of life, or problems with virus systematics".South African Journal of Science.86:182–6.ISSN0038-2353.
^Bolhuis, H. and Cretoiu, M.S. (2016) "What is so special about marine microorganisms?". In: L. J. Stal and M. S. Cretoiu (Eds.)The Marine Microbiome, pages 3–20, Springer.ISBN9783319330006
^Glud, Ronnie; Wenzhöfer, Frank; Middelboe, Mathias; Oguri, Kazumasa; Turnewitsch, Robert; Canfield, Donald E.; Kitazato, Hiroshi (17 March 2013). "High rates of microbial carbon turnover in sediments in the deepest oceanic trench on Earth".Nature Geoscience.6 (4):284–288.Bibcode:2013NatGe...6..284G.doi:10.1038/ngeo1773.
^abCanchaya C, Fournous G, Chibani-Chennoufi S, Dillmann ML, Brüssow H (2003). "Phage as agents of lateral gene transfer".Current Opinion in Microbiology.6 (4):417–24.doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00086-9.PMID12941415.
^abRybicki EP (1990). "The classification of organisms at the edge of life, or problems with virus systematics".South African Journal of Science.86:182–186.
^Kauffman KM, Hussain FA, Yang J, Arevalo P, Brown JM, Chang WK, VanInsberghe D, Elsherbini J, Sharma RS, Cutler MB, Kelly L, Polz MF (2018). "A major lineage of non-tailed dsDNA viruses as unrecognized killers of marine bacteria".Nature.554 (7690):118–122.Bibcode:2018Natur.554..118K.doi:10.1038/nature25474.PMID29364876.S2CID4462007.
^Forterre P, Philippe H (1999). "The last universal common ancestor (LUCA), simple or complex?".The Biological Bulletin.196 (3):373–5, discussion 375–7.doi:10.2307/1542973.JSTOR1542973.PMID11536914.
^Yamaguchi, Masashi; et al. (1 December 2012). "Prokaryote or eukaryote? A unique microorganism from the deep sea".Journal of Electron Microscopy.61 (6):423–431.doi:10.1093/jmicro/dfs062.PMID23024290.
^Gooday, A. J.; Aranda da Silva, A.; Pawlowski, J. (1 December 2011). "Xenophyophores (Rhizaria, Foraminifera) from the Nazaré Canyon (Portuguese margin, NE Atlantic)".Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. The Geology, Geochemistry, and Biology of Submarine Canyons West of Portugal.58 (23–24):2401–2419.Bibcode:2011DSRII..58.2401G.doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2011.04.005.
^O'Malley MA, Simpson AG, Roger AJ (2012). "The other eukaryotes in light of evolutionary protistology".Biology & Philosophy.28 (2):299–330.doi:10.1007/s10539-012-9354-y.S2CID85406712.
^Singleton, Paul (2006).Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, 3rd Edition, revised. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. p. 32.ISBN978-0-470-03545-0.
^Gutierrez, Marcelo H; Pantoja, Silvio; Quinones, Renato a and Gonzalez, Rodrigo R. First record of flamentous fungi in the coastal upwelling ecosystem off central Chile.Gayana (Concepc.) [online]. 2010, vol.74, n.1, pp. 66-73.ISSN0717-6538.
^abSridhar, K.R. (2009). "10. Aquatic fungi – Are they planktonic?".Plankton Dynamics of Indian Waters. Jaipur, India: Pratiksha Publications. pp. 133–148.
^abCampbell, Neil A.; Reece, Jane B.; Urry, Lisa Andrea; Cain, Michael L.; Wasserman, Steven Alexander; Minorsky, Peter V.; Jackson, Robert Bradley (2008).Biology (8th ed.). San Francisco: Pearson – Benjamin Cummings.ISBN978-0-321-54325-7.
^Starckx, Senne (31 October 2012)."A place in the sun".Flanders Today. Archived fromthe original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved8 December 2012.Algae is the crop of the future, according to researchers in Geel
^Mandoli DF (1998). "Elaboration of Body Plan and Phase Change during Development of Acetabularia: How Is the Complex Architecture of a Giant Unicell Built?".Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology.49:173–198.doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.173.PMID15012232.S2CID6241264.
^Duval, B.; Margulis, L. (1995). "The microbial community ofOphrydium versatile colonies: endosymbionts, residents, and tenants".Symbiosis.18:181–210.PMID11539474.
^Lalli, C.; Parsons, T. (1993).Biological Oceanography: An Introduction. Butterworth-Heinemann.ISBN0-7506-3384-0.
^Rost, B. and Riebesell, U. (2004) "Coccolithophores and the biological pump: responses to environmental changes". In:Coccolithophores: From Molecular Processes to Global Impact, pages 99–125, Springer.ISBN9783662062784.
^Wassilieff, Maggy (2006)"A coccolithophore",Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Accessed: 2 November 2019.
^Sparks, William B.; DasSarma, S.; Reid, I. N. (December 2006). "Evolutionary Competition Between Primitive Photosynthetic Systems: Existence of an early purple Earth?".American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts.38: 901.Bibcode:2006AAS...209.0605S.
^Redfield, Alfred C. (1934). "On the Proportions of Organic Derivatives in Sea Water and their Relation to the Composition of Plankton". In Johnstone, James; Daniel, Richard Jellicoe (eds.).James Johnstone Memorial Volume. Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool. pp. 176–92.OCLC13993674.
^Finlay, B.J. (2013)."Microaerophily". In Marshall, K.C. (ed.).Advances in Microbial Ecology. Vol. 11. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 22.ISBN978-1-4684-7612-5.
^Schoemann, Véronique; Becquevort, Sylvie; Stefels, Jacqueline; Rousseau, Véronique; Lancelot, Christiane (1 January 2005). "Phaeocystis blooms in the global ocean and their controlling mechanisms: a review".Journal of Sea Research. Iron Resources and Oceanic Nutrients – Advancement of Global Environmental Simulations.53 (1–2):43–66.Bibcode:2005JSR....53...43S.CiteSeerX10.1.1.319.9563.doi:10.1016/j.seares.2004.01.008.
^Grethe R. Hasle; Erik E. Syvertsen; Karen A. Steidinger; Karl Tangen (25 January 1996)."Marine Diatoms". In Carmelo R. Tomas (ed.).Identifying Marine Diatoms and Dinoflagellates. Academic Press. pp. 5–385.ISBN978-0-08-053441-1. Retrieved13 November 2013.
^Moheimani, N.R.; Webb, J.P.; Borowitzka, M.A. (2012), "Bioremediation and other potential applications of coccolithophorid algae: A review. . Bioremediation and other potential applications of coccolithophorid algae: A review",Algal Research,1 (2):120–133,doi:10.1016/j.algal.2012.06.002
^Theis, K.R., Dheilly, N.M., Klassen, J.L., Brucker, R.M., Baines, J.F., Bosch, T.C., Cryan, J.F., Gilbert, S.F., Goodnight, C.J., Lloyd, E.A. and Sapp, J. (2016) "Getting the hologenome concept right: an eco-evolutionary framework for hosts and their microbiomes".Msystems,1(2).doi:10.1128/mSystems.00028-16. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
^Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., Van Themaat, E.V.L. and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) "Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants".Annual review of plant biology,64: 807–838.doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106.
^Sánchez-Cañizares, C., Jorrín, B., Poole, P.S. and Tkacz, A. (2017) "Understanding the holobiont: the interdependence of plants and their microbiome".Current Opinion in Microbiology,38: 188–196.doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.07.001.
^Douglas, A.E. and Werren, J.H. (2016) "Holes in the hologenome: why host-microbe symbioses are not holobionts".MBio,7(2).doi:10.1128/mBio.02099-15.
^Knowlton, N. and Rohwer, F. (2003) "Multispecies microbial mutualisms on coral reefs: the host as a habitat".The American Naturalist,162(S4): S51-S62.doi:10.1086/378684.
^Thompson, J.R., Rivera, H.E., Closek, C.J. and Medina, M. (2015) "Microbes in the coral holobiont: partners through evolution, development, and ecological interactions".Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology,4: 176.doi:10.3389/fcimb.2014.00176.
^Cavalcanti, G.S., Shukla, P., Morris, M., Ribeiro, B., Foley, M., Doane, M.P., Thompson, C.C., Edwards, M.S., Dinsdale, E.A. and Thompson, F.L. (2018) "Rhodoliths holobionts in a changing ocean: host-microbes interactions mediate coralline algae resilience under ocean acidification".BMC Genomics,19(1): 1–13.doi:10.1186/s12864-018-5064-4. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
^Robinson, Carol, and Nagappa Ramaiah. "Microbial heterotrophic metabolic rates constrain the microbial carbon pump." The American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011.
^Monroy, P., Hernández-García, E., Rossi, V. and López, C. (2017) "Modeling the dynamical sinking of biogenic particles in oceanic flow".Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics,24(2): 293–305.doi:10.5194/npg-24-293-2017. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License.
^Simon, M., Grossart, H., Schweitzer, B. and Ploug, H. (2002) "Microbial ecology of organic aggregates in aquatic ecosystems".Aquatic microbial ecology,28: 175–211.doi:10.3354/ame028175.
^Boetius, Antje; Anesio, Alexandre M.; Deming, Jody W.; Mikucki, Jill A.; Rapp, Josephine Z. (1 November 2015). "Microbial ecology of the cryosphere: sea ice and glacial habitats".Nature Reviews Microbiology.13 (11):677–690.doi:10.1038/nrmicro3522.PMID26344407.S2CID20798336.
^Kádár, Enikõ; Costa, Valentina; Santos, Ricardo S.; Powell, Jonathan J. (July 2006). "Tissue partitioning of micro-essential metals in the vent bivalve Bathymodiolus azoricus and associated organisms (endosymbiont bacteria and a parasite polychaete) from geochemically distinct vents of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge".Journal of Sea Research.56 (1):45–52.Bibcode:2006JSR....56...45K.doi:10.1016/j.seares.2006.01.002.ISSN1385-1101.
^Ortmann, Alice C.; Suttle, Curtis A. (August 2005). "High abundances of viruses in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent system indicates viral mediated microbial mortality".Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers.52 (8):1515–1527.Bibcode:2005DSRI...52.1515O.doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2005.04.002.ISSN0967-0637.
^Lollar, Garnet S.; Warr, Oliver; Telling, Jon; Osburn, Magdalena R.; Sherwood Lollar, Barbara (2019). "'Follow the Water': Hydrogeochemical Constraints on Microbial Investigations 2.4 km Below Surface at the Kidd Creek Deep Fluid and Deep Life Observatory".Geomicrobiology Journal.36 (10):859–872.Bibcode:2019GmbJ...36..859L.doi:10.1080/01490451.2019.1641770.S2CID199636268.
^Hedlund, Brian P.; Dodsworth, Jeremy A.; Murugapiran, Senthil K.; Rinke, Christian; Woyke, Tanja (2014). "Impact of single-cell genomics and metagenomics on the emerging view of extremophile "microbial dark matter"".Extremophiles.18 (5):865–875.doi:10.1007/s00792-014-0664-7.ISSN1431-0651.PMID25113821.S2CID16888890.
^abCollins, R. Eric (2019)The Small and Mighty – Microbial LifeNOAA: Ocean Exploration and Research, Gulf of Alaska Seamounts 2019 Expedition. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
^Lozupone, C.A., Stombaugh, J.I., Gordon, J.I., Jansson, J.K. and Knight, R. (2012) "Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota".Nature,489(7415): 220–230.doi:10.1038/nature11550.
^Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J.F., Halpern, A.L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J.A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K.E., Nelson, W. and Fouts, D.E. (2004) "Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea".Science,304(5667): 66–74.doi:10.1126/science.1093857.
^Liu, L., Li, Y., Li, S., Hu, N., He, Y., Pong, R., Lin, D., Lu, L. and Law, M. (2012) "Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems".BioMed Research International,2012: 251364.doi:10.1155/2012/251364.
^Berg, Gabriele; Daria Rybakova, Doreen Fischer, Tomislav Cernava, Marie-Christine Champomier Vergès, Trevor Charles, Xiaoyulong Chen, Luca Cocolin, Kellye Eversole, Gema Herrero Corral, Maria Kazou, Linda Kinkel, Lene Lange, Nelson Lima, Alexander Loy, James A. Macklin, Emmanuelle Maguin, Tim Mauchline, Ryan McClure, Birgit Mitter, Matthew Ryan, Inga Sarand, Hauke Smidt, Bettina Schelkle, Hugo Roume, G. Seghal Kiran, Joseph Selvin, Rafael Soares Correa de Souza, Leo van Overbeek, Brajesh K. Singh, Michael Wagner, Aaron Walsh, Angela Sessitsch and Michael Schloter (2020) "Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges".Microbiome,8(103): 1–22.doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
^Zhang, W., Li, F. and Nie, L. (2010) "Integrating multiple 'omics' analysis for microbial biology: application and methodologies".Microbiology,156(2): 287–301.doi:10.1099/mic.0.034793-0.
^Capotondi, A., Jacox, M., Bowler, C., Kavanaugh, M., Lehodey, P., Barrie, D., Brodie, S., Chaffron, S., Cheng, W., Dias, D.F., Eveillard, D. and 20 others (2019) "Observational needs supporting marine ecosystems modeling and forecasting: from the global ocean to regional and coastal systems".Frontiers in Marine Science,6: 623.doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00623. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
^Sunagawa, S., Coelho, L. P., Chaffron, S., Kultima, J. R., Labadie, K., Salazar, G., et al. (2015). "Ocean plankton. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome".Science,348: 1261359.doi:10.1126/science.1261359.
^Guidi, L., Chaffron, S., Bittner, L., Eveillard, D., Larhlimi, A., Roux, S., et al. (2016). "Plankton networks driving carbon export in the oligotrophic ocean".Nature,532: 465–470.doi:10.1038/nature16942.
^Guyennon, A., Baklouti, M., Diaz, F., Palmieri, J., Beuvier, J., Lebaupin-Brossier, C., et al. (2015). "New insights into the organic carbon export in the Mediterranean Sea from 3-D modelling".Biogeosciences,11: 425–442.doi:10.5194/bg-12-7025-2015.
^Louca, S., Parfrey, L. W., and Doebeli, M. (2016). "Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome".Science,353: 1272–1277.doi:10.1126/science.aaf4507.
^Coles, V. J., Stukel, M. R., Brooks, M. T., Burd, A., Crump, B. C., Moran, M. A., et al. (2017). "Ocean biogeochemistry modeled with emergent trait-based genomics".Science,358: 1149–1154.doi:10.1126/science.aan5712.
^Mock, T., Daines, S.J., Geider, R., Collins, S., Metodiev, M., Millar, A.J., Moulton, V. and Lenton, T.M. (2016) "Bridging the gap between omics and earth system science to better understand how environmental change impacts marine microbes".Global Change Biology,22(1): 61–75.doi:10.1111/gcb.12983. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
^abToseland A, Daines SJ and Clark JR et al. (2013) "The impact of temperature on marine phytoplankton resource allocation and metabolism".Nature Climate Change,3: 979– 984.doi:10.1038/nclimate1989.
^Martiny AC, Pham CTA, Primeau FW, Vrugt JA, Moore JK, Levin SA and Lomas MW (2013) "Strong latitudinal patterns in the elemental ratios of marine plankton and organic matter".Nature Geoscience,6: 279–283.doi:10.1038/ngeo1757.