Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Marine microorganisms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromMicroplankton)
Any life form too small for the naked human eye to see that lives in a marine environment

Role of the microbial community in the marinecarbon cycle
Part of a series of overviews on
Marine life
Part of a series on
Plankton
Phytoplankton

Marine microorganisms are defined by their habitat asmicroorganisms living in amarine environment, that is, in thesaltwater of a sea or ocean or thebrackish water of a coastalestuary. A microorganism (ormicrobe) is anymicroscopiclivingorganism orvirus, which is invisibly small to theunaided human eye withoutmagnification. Microorganisms are very diverse. They can besingle-celled[1] ormulticellular and includebacteria,archaea, viruses, and mostprotozoa, as well as somefungi,algae, and animals, such asrotifers andcopepods. Manymacroscopic animals andplants have microscopicjuvenile stages. Some microbiologists also classifyviruses as microorganisms, but others consider these as non-living.[2][3]

Marine microorganisms have been variously estimated to make up about 70%,[4] or about 90%,[5][6] of thebiomass in the ocean. Taken together they form themarine microbiome. Over billions of years this microbiome has evolved many life styles and adaptations and come to participate in theglobal cycling of almost all chemical elements.[7] Microorganisms are crucial to nutrient recycling inecosystems as they act asdecomposers. They are also responsible for nearly allphotosynthesis that occurs in the ocean, as well as the cycling ofcarbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and othernutrients and trace elements.[8] Marine microorganisms sequester large amounts of carbon and produce much of the world's oxygen.

A small proportion of marine microorganisms arepathogenic, causing disease and even death in marine plants and animals.[9] However marine microorganismsrecycle the majorchemical elements, both producing and consuming about half of all organic matter generated on the planet every year. As inhabitants of the largest environment on Earth, microbial marine systems drive changes in every global system.

In July 2016, scientists reported identifying a set of 355genes from thelast universal common ancestor (LUCA) of alllife on the planet, including the marine microorganisms.[10] Despite its diversity, microscopic life in the oceans is still poorly understood. For example, the role ofviruses in marine ecosystems has barely been explored even in the beginning of the 21st century.[11]

Overview

[edit]
microbial mats
Microbial mats are the earliest form of life on Earth for which there is goodfossil evidence. The image shows acyanobacterial-algal mat.
Stromatolites are formed from microbial mats as microbes slowly move upwards to avoid being smothered by sediment.
Relative sizes of microscopic entities
See also:Evolution of cells

Microorganisms make up about 70% of themarine biomass.[4] Amicroorganism, or microbe, is amicroscopicorganism too small to be recognised adequately with the naked eye. In practice, that includes organisms smaller than about 0.1 mm.[12]: 13 

Such organisms can besingle-celled[1] ormulticellular. Microorganisms are diverse and include allbacteria andarchaea, mostprotists includingalgae,protozoa andfungal-like protists, as well as certain microscopic animals such asrotifers. Manymacroscopic animals andplants have microscopicjuvenile stages. Some microbiologists also classifyviruses as microorganisms, but others consider these as non-living.[2][3]

Microorganisms are crucial to nutrient recycling inecosystems as they act asdecomposers. Some microorganisms arepathogenic, causing disease and even death in plants and animals.[9] As inhabitants of the largest environment on Earth, microbial marine systems drive changes in every global system. Microbes are responsible for virtually all thephotosynthesis that occurs in the ocean, as well as the cycling ofcarbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and othernutrients and trace elements.[8]

Marine microorganisms

While recent technological developments and scientific discoveries have been substantial, we still lack a major understanding at all levels of the basic ecological questions in relation to the microorganisms in our seas and oceans. These fundamental questions are:
1. What is out there? Which microorganisms are present in our seas and oceans and in what numbersdo they occur?
2. What are they doing? What functions do each of these microorganisms perform in the marine environment and how do they contribute to the global cycles of energy and matter?
3. What are the factors that determine the presence or absence of a microorganism and how do they influence biodiversity and function and vice versa?

European Science Foundation, 2012[12]: 14 
The range of sizes shown byprokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) andviruses relative to those of other organisms andbiomolecules
Under a magnifier, a splash of seawater teems with microscopic life

Microscopic life undersea is diverse and still poorly understood, such as for the role ofviruses in marine ecosystems.[13] Most marine viruses arebacteriophages, which are harmless to plants and animals, but are essential to the regulation of saltwater and freshwater ecosystems.[14] They infect and destroy bacteria in aquatic microbial communities, and are the most important mechanism ofrecycling carbon in the marine environment. The organic molecules released from the dead bacterial cells stimulate fresh bacterial and algal growth.[15] Viral activity may also contribute to thebiological pump, the process wherebycarbon issequestered in the deep ocean.[16]

Sea spray containing marine microorganisms can be swept high into the atmosphere where they becomeaeroplankton, and can travel the globe before falling back to earth.

A stream of airborne microorganisms circles the planet above weather systems but below commercial air lanes.[17] Some peripatetic microorganisms are swept up from terrestrial dust storms, but most originate from marine microorganisms insea spray. In 2018, scientists reported that hundreds of millions of viruses and tens of millions of bacteria are deposited daily on every square meter around the planet.[18][19]

Microscopic organisms live throughout thebiosphere. The mass ofprokaryote microorganisms — which includes bacteria and archaea, but not the nucleatedeukaryote microorganisms — may be as much as 0.8 trillion tons of carbon (of the total biospheremass, estimated at between 1 and 4 trillion tons).[20] Single-celledbarophilic marine microbes have been found at a depth of 10,900 m (35,800 ft) in theMariana Trench, the deepest spot in the Earth's oceans.[21][22] Microorganisms live inside rocks 580 m (1,900 ft) below the sea floor under 2,590 m (8,500 ft) of ocean off the coast of the northwesternUnited States,[21][23] as well as 2,400 m (7,900 ft; 1.5 mi) beneath the seabed off Japan.[24] The greatest known temperature at which microbial life can exist is 122 °C (252 °F) (Methanopyrus kandleri).[25] In 2014, scientists confirmed the existence of microorganisms living 800 m (2,600 ft) below the ice ofAntarctica.[26][27] According to one researcher, "You can find microbes everywhere — they're extremely adaptable to conditions, and survive wherever they are."[21] Marine microorganisms serve as "the foundation of all marine food webs, recycling major elements and producing and consuming about half the organic matter generated on Earth each year".[28][29]

Marine viruses

[edit]
Virus-host interactions in the marine ecosystem,
including viral infection of bacteria, phytoplankton and fish[30]
Main article:Marine viruses

Avirus is a smallinfectious agent thatreplicates only inside the livingcells of otherorganisms. Viruses can infect all types oflife forms, fromanimals andplants tomicroorganisms, includingbacteria andarchaea.[31]

When not inside an infected cell or in the process of infecting a cell, viruses exist in the form of independent particles. These viral particles, also known asvirions, consist of two or three parts: (i) thegenetic material (genome) made from eitherDNA orRNA, longmolecules that carry genetic information; (ii) aprotein coat called thecapsid, which surrounds and protects the genetic material; and in some cases (iii) anenvelope oflipids that surrounds the protein coat when they are outside a cell. The shapes of these virus particles range from simplehelical andicosahedral forms for some virus species to more complex structures for others. Most virus species have virions that are too small to be seen with anoptical microscope. The average virion is about one one-hundredth the size of the averagebacterium.

The origins of viruses in theevolutionary history of life are unclear: some may haveevolved fromplasmids—pieces of DNA that can move between cells—while others may have evolved from bacteria. In evolution, viruses are an important means ofhorizontal gene transfer, which increasesgenetic diversity.[32] Viruses are considered by some to be a life form, because they carry genetic material, reproduce, and evolve throughnatural selection. However, they lack key characteristics (such as cell structure) that are generally considered necessary to count as life. Because they possess some but not all such qualities, viruses have been described as "organisms at the edge of life"[33] and as replicators.[34]

Bacteriophages (phages)
Multiple phages attached to a bacterial cell wall at 200,000x magnification
Diagram of a typicaltailed phage
Phage injecting its genome into bacteria

Viruses are found wherever there is life and have probably existed since living cells first evolved.[35] The origin of viruses is unclear because they do not form fossils, somolecular techniques have been used to compare the DNA or RNA of viruses and are a useful means of investigating how they arose.[36]

Viruses are now recognised as ancient and as having origins that pre-date the divergence of life into thethree domains.[37]

Opinions differ on whether viruses are a form oflife or organic structures that interact with living organisms.[34] They are considered by some to be a life form, because they carry genetic material, reproduce by creating multiple copies of themselves through self-assembly, and evolve throughnatural selection. However they lack key characteristics such as a cellular structure generally considered necessary to count as life. Because they possess some but not all such qualities, viruses have been described as replicators[34] and as "organisms at the edge of life".[33]

Phages

[edit]
Virions of different families oftailed phages
These arecyanophages, viruses that infectcyanobacteria (scale bars indicate 100 nm)

Bacteriophages, often just calledphages, are viruses thatparasite bacteria and archaea.Marine phages parasite marine bacteria and archaea, such ascyanobacteria.[38] They are a common and diverse group of viruses and are the most abundant biological entity in marine environments, because their hosts, bacteria, are typically the numerically dominant cellular life in the sea. Generally there are about 1 million to 10 million viruses in each mL of seawater, or about ten times more double-stranded DNA viruses than there are cellular organisms,[39][40] although estimates of viral abundance in seawater can vary over a wide range.[41][42] For a long time,tailed phages of the orderCaudovirales seemed to dominate marine ecosystems in number and diversity of organisms.[38]However, as a result of more recent research, non-tailed viruses appear to be dominant in multiple depths and oceanic regions, followed by theCaudovirales families of myoviruses, podoviruses, and siphoviruses.[43]Phages belonging to the families:Corticoviridae,[44]Inoviridae,[45]Microviridae,[46] andAutolykiviridae[47][48][49][50]are also known to infect diverse marine bacteria.

There are also archaean viruses which replicate withinarchaea: these are double-stranded DNA viruses with unusual and sometimes unique shapes.[51][52] These viruses have been studied in most detail in thethermophilic archaea, particularly the ordersSulfolobales andThermoproteales.[53]

Role of viruses

[edit]

Microorganisms make up about 70% of the marine biomass.[4] It is estimated viruses kill 20% of this biomass each day and that there are 15 times as many viruses in the oceans as there are bacteria and archaea. Viruses are the main agents responsible for the rapid destruction of harmfulalgal blooms,[40] which often kill other marine life.[54]The number of viruses in the oceans decreases further offshore and deeper into the water, where there are fewer host organisms.[16]

Viruses are an important natural means oftransferring genes between different species, which increasesgenetic diversity and drives evolution.[32] It is thought that viruses played a central role in the early evolution, before the diversification of bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes, at the time of thelast universal common ancestor of life on Earth.[55] Viruses are still one of the largest reservoirs of unexplored genetic diversity on Earth.[16]

Giant viruses

[edit]
The giantmimivirus
Largest known virus,Tupanvirus, named afterTupã, the Guaranisupreme god of creation

Viruses normally range in length from about 20 to 300 nanometers. This can be contrasted with the length of bacteria, which starts at about 400 nanometers. There are alsogiant viruses, often calledgiruses, typically about 1000 nanometers (one micron) in length. All giant viruses belongtophylumNucleocytoviricota (NCLDV), together withpoxviruses.The largest known of these isTupanvirus. This genus of giant virus was discovered in 2018 in the deep ocean as well as a soda lake, and can reach up to 2.3 microns in total length.[56]

The discovery and subsequent characterization of giant viruses has triggered some debate concerning their evolutionary origins.[57] The two main hypotheses for their origin are that either they evolved from small viruses, picking up DNA from host organisms, or that they evolved from very complicated organisms into the current form which is not self-sufficient for reproduction.[58] What sort of complicated organism giant viruses might have diverged from is also a topic of debate. One proposal is that the origin point actually represents a fourthdomain of life,[59][60] but this has been largely discounted.[61][62]

Prokaryotes

[edit]
Main article:Marine prokaryotes

Marine bacteria

[edit]
Pelagibacter ubique, the most abundant bacteria in the ocean, plays a major role in the globalcarbon cycle.
Vibrio vulnificus, a virulent bacterium found inestuaries and along coastal areas
Electron micrograph showing a species of the widespread cyanobacteriaSynechococcus.Carboxysomes appear as polyhedral dark structures.
See also:Bacterioplankton andBacterial motility

Bacteria constitute a largedomain ofprokaryoticmicroorganisms. Typically a fewmicrometres in length, bacteria have a number of shapes, ranging from spheres to rods and spirals. Bacteria were among the first life forms to appear onEarth, and are present in most of itshabitats. Bacteria inhabit soil, water,acidic hot springs,radioactive waste,[63] and the deep portions ofEarth's crust. Bacteria also live insymbiotic andparasitic relationships with plants and animals.

Once regarded asplants constituting the classSchizomycetes, bacteria are now classified asprokaryotes. Unlike cells of animals and othereukaryotes, bacterial cells do not contain anucleus and rarely harbourmembrane-boundorganelles. Although the termbacteria traditionally included all prokaryotes, thescientific classification changed after the discovery in the 1990s that prokaryotes consist of two very different groups of organisms thatevolved from an ancient common ancestor. Theseevolutionary domains are calledBacteria andArchaea.[64]

The ancestors of modern bacteria were unicellular microorganisms that were thefirst forms of life to appear on Earth, about 4 billion years ago. For about 3 billion years, most organisms were microscopic, and bacteria and archaea were the dominant forms of life.[65][66] Although bacterialfossils exist, such asstromatolites, their lack of distinctivemorphology prevents them from being used to examine the history of bacterial evolution, or to date the time of origin of a particular bacterial species. However, gene sequences can be used to reconstruct the bacterialphylogeny, and these studies indicate that bacteria diverged first from the archaeal/eukaryotic lineage.[67] Bacteria were also involved in the second great evolutionary divergence, that of the archaea and eukaryotes. Here, eukaryotes resulted from the entering of ancient bacteria intoendosymbiotic associations with the ancestors of eukaryotic cells, which were themselves possibly related to theArchaea.[68][69] This involved the engulfment by proto-eukaryotic cells ofalphaproteobacterial symbionts to form eithermitochondria orhydrogenosomes, which are still found in all known Eukarya. Later on, some eukaryotes that already contained mitochondria also engulfed cyanobacterial-like organisms. This led to the formation ofchloroplasts in algae and plants. There are also some algae that originated from even later endosymbiotic events. Here, eukaryotes engulfed a eukaryotic algae that developed into a "second-generation" plastid.[70][71] This is known assecondary endosymbiosis.

Pelagibacter ubique and its relatives may be the most abundant organisms in the ocean, and it has been claimed that they are possibly the most abundant bacteria in the world. They make up about 25% of all microbialplankton cells, and in the summer they may account for approximately half the cells present in temperate ocean surface water. The total abundance ofP. ubique and relatives is estimated to be about 2 × 1028 microbes.[73] However, it was reported inNature in February 2013 that thebacteriophageHTVC010P, which attacksP. ubique, has been discovered and "it probably really is the commonest organism on the planet".[74][75]

The largest known bacterium, the marineThiomargarita namibiensis, can be visible to the naked eye and sometimes attains 0.75 mm (750 μm).[76][77]

Marine archaea

[edit]
Archaea were initially viewed asextremophiles living in harsh environments, such as the yellow archaea pictured here in ahot spring, but they have since been found in a much broader range ofhabitats.[78]
See also:Marine prokaryotes

Thearchaea (Greek forancient[79]) constitute adomain andkingdom ofsingle-celledmicroorganisms. These microbes areprokaryotes, meaning they have nocell nucleus or any other membrane-boundorganelles in their cells.

Archaea were initially classified asbacteria, but this classification is outdated.[80] Archaeal cells have unique properties separating them from the other two domains of life,Bacteria andEukaryota. The Archaea are further divided into multiple recognizedphyla. Classification is difficult because the majority have not been isolated in the laboratory and have only been detected by analysis of theirnucleic acids in samples from their environment.

Archaea and bacteria are generally similar in size and shape, although a few archaea have very strange shapes, such as the flat and square-shaped cells ofHaloquadratum walsbyi.[81] Despite this morphological similarity to bacteria, archaea possessgenes and severalmetabolic pathways that are more closely related to those of eukaryotes, notably theenzymes involved intranscription andtranslation. Other aspects of archaeal biochemistry are unique, such as their reliance onether lipids in theircell membranes, such asarchaeols. Archaea use more energy sources than eukaryotes: these range fromorganic compounds, such as sugars, toammonia,metal ions or evenhydrogen gas. Salt-tolerant archaea (theHaloarchaea) use sunlight as an energy source, and other species of archaeafix carbon; however, unlike plants andcyanobacteria, no known species of archaea does both. Archaeareproduce asexually bybinary fission,fragmentation, orbudding; unlike bacteria and eukaryotes, no known species formsspores.

Archaea are particularly numerous in the oceans, and the archaea inplankton may be one of the most abundant groups of organisms on the planet. Archaea are a major part of Earth's life and may play roles in both thecarbon cycle and thenitrogen cycle.Thermoproteota (also known as eocytes or Crenarchaeota) are a phylum of archaea thought to be very abundant in marine environments and one of the main contributors to the fixation of carbon.[82]

Eukaryotes

[edit]
Parakaryon myojinensis, a possibletransitional form between a prokaryote and a eukaryote

Where Did Eukaryotic Cells Come From?Journey to the Microcosmos

All living organisms can be grouped as eitherprokaryotes oreukaryotes. Life originated assingle-celled prokaryotes and later evolved into the more complex eukaryotes. In contrast to prokaryotic cells, eukaryotic cells are highly organised. Prokaryotes are the bacteria and archaea, while eukaryotes are the other life forms —protists, plants, fungi and animals. Protists are usually single-celled, while plants, fungi and animals are usuallymulti-celled.

It seems very plausible that the root of the eukaryotes lie within archaea; the closest relatives nowadays known may be theHeimdallarchaeota phylum of the proposedAsgard superphylum. This theory is a modern version of a scenario originally proposed in 1984 asEocyte hypothesis, whenThermoproteota were the closest known archaeal relatives of eukaryotes then.A possibletransitional form of microorganism between a prokaryote and a eukaryote was discovered in 2012 by Japanese scientists.Parakaryon myojinensis is a unique microorganism larger than a typical prokaryote, but with nuclear material enclosed in a membrane as in a eukaryote, and the presence ofendosymbionts. This is seen to be the first plausible evolutionary form of microorganism, showing a stage of development from the prokaryote to the eukaryote.[83][84]

Marine protists

[edit]
Main article:Marine protists

Protists are eukaryotes that cannot be classified as plants, fungi or animals. They are usually single-celled and microscopic. Life originated assingle-celled prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) and later evolved intomore complex eukaryotes. Eukaryotes are the more developed life forms known as plants, animals, fungi and protists. The term protist came into use historically as a term of convenience for eukaryotes that cannot be strictly classified as plants, animals or fungi. They are not a part of modern cladistics, because they areparaphyletic (lacking a common ancestor).

By trophic mode

[edit]

Protists can be broadly divided into four groups depending on whether their nutrition is plant-like, animal-like, fungal-like,[85] or a mixture of these.[86]

Protists according to how they get food
Type of protistDescriptionExampleSome other examples
Plant-likeAutotrophic protists that make their own food without needing to consume other organisms, usually by using photosynthesisGreen algae,PyramimonasRed andbrown algae,diatoms and somedinoflagellates. Plant-like protists are important components of phytoplanktondiscussed below.
Animal-likeHeterotrophic protists that get their food consuming other organisms (bacteria, archaea and small algae)Radiolarian protist as drawn byHaeckelForaminiferans, and some marineamoebae,ciliates andflagellates.
Fungal-likeSaprotrophic protists that get their food from the remains of organisms that have broken down and decayedMarineslime nets form labyrinthine networks of tubes in which amoeba without pseudopods can travelMarine lichen
Mixotrops
Various
Mixotrophic andosmotrophic protists that get their food from a combination of the aboveEuglena mutabilis, a photosyntheticflagellateMany marine mixotrops are found among protists, particularly among ciliates and dinoflagellates[87]
micrograph
cell schematic
Choanoflagellates, unicellular "collared"flagellate protists, are thought to be the closest living relatives of theanimals.[88]

Protists are highly diverse organisms currently organised into 18 phyla, but are not easy to classify.[89][90] Studies have shown high protist diversity exists in oceans, deep sea-vents and river sediments, suggesting a large number of eukaryotic microbial communities have yet to be discovered.[91][92] There has been little research onmixotrophic protists, but recent studies in marine environments found mixotrophic protests contribute a significant part of the protistbiomass.[87] Since protists are eukaryotes they possess within their cell at least onenucleus, as well asorganelles such asmitochondria andGolgi bodies. Protists are asexual but can reproduce rapidly throughmitosis or byfragmentation.

External videos
video iconHow microscopic hunters get their lunch
video iconEuglenoids: Single-celled shapeshifters
video iconHow do protozoans get around?
  • Ciliate ingesting a diatom
  • Amoeba engulfing a diatom

In contrast to the cells of prokaryotes, the cells of eukaryotes are highly organised. Plants, animals and fungi are usuallymulti-celled and are typicallymacroscopic. Most protists are single-celled and microscopic. But there are exceptions. Some single-celled marine protists are macroscopic. Some marine slime molds have unique life cycles that involve switching between unicellular,colonial, and multicellular forms.[95] Other marine protist are neither single-celled nor microscopic, such asseaweed.

Protists have been described as a taxonomic grab bag of misfits where anything that doesn't fit into one of the mainbiological kingdoms can be placed.[98] Some modern authors prefer to exclude multicellular organisms from the traditional definition of a protist, restricting protists to unicellular organisms.[99][100] This more constrained definition excludes manybrown, multicellularred andgreen algae, andslime molds.[101]

By locomotion

[edit]
Main article:Protist locomotion

Another way of categorising protists is according to their mode of locomotion. Many unicellular protists, particularly protozoans, aremotile and cangenerate movement usingflagella,cilia orpseudopods. Cells which use flagella for movement are usually referred to asflagellates, cells which use cilia are usually referred to asciliates, and cells which use pseudopods are usually referred to asamoeba oramoeboids. Other protists arenot motile, and consequently have no movement mechanism.

Protists according to how they move
Type of protistMovement mechanismDescriptionExampleOther examples
MotileFlagellatesAflagellum (Latin forwhip) is a lash-like appendage that protrudes from the cell body of some protists (as well as some bacteria). Flagellates use from one to several flagella for locomotion and sometimes as feeding and sensoryorganelle.CryptophytesAlldinoflagellates andnanoflagellates (choanoflagellates,silicoflagellates, mostgreen algae)[102][103]
(Other protists go through a phase asgametes when they have temporary flagellum – someradiolarians,foraminiferans andApicomplexa)
CiliatesAcilium (Latin foreyelash) is a tiny flagellum. Ciliates use multiple cilia, which can number in many hundreds, to power themselves through the water.Paramecium bursaria
click to see cilia
Foraminiferans, and some marineamoebae,ciliates andflagellates.
Amoebas
(amoeboids)
Amoeba have the ability to alter shape by extending and retractingpseudopods (Greek forfalse feet).[104]
AmoebaFound in every major protistlineage. Amoeboid cells occur among theprotozoans, but also in thealgae and thefungi.[105][106]
Not motile
none
DiatomDiatoms,coccolithophores, and non‐motile species ofPhaeocystis[103] Among protozoans the parasiticApicomplexa are non‐motile.

Flagellates include bacteria as well as protists. The rotary motor model used by bacteria uses the protons of anelectrochemical gradient in order to move their flagella.Torque in the flagella of bacteria is created by particles that conduct protons around the base of the flagellum. The direction of rotation of the flagella in bacteria comes from the occupancy of the proton channels along the perimeter of the flagellar motor.[107]

Ciliates generally have hundreds to thousands of cilia that are densely packed together in arrays. During movement, an individual cilium deforms using a high-friction power stroke followed by a low-friction recovery stroke. Since there are multiple cilia packed together on an individual organism, they display collective behavior in ametachronal rhythm. This means the deformation of one cilium is in phase with the deformation of its neighbor, causing deformation waves that propagate along the surface of the organism. These propagating waves of cilia are what allow the organism to use the cilia in a coordinated manner to move. A typical example of a ciliated microorganism is theParamecium, a one-celled, ciliated protozoan covered by thousands of cilia. The cilia beating together allow theParamecium to propel through the water at speeds of 500 micrometers per second.[108]

External videos
video iconParamecium: The White Rat of Ciliates

Marine fungi

[edit]
Lichen on a rock in a marinesplash zone. Lichens are mutualistic associations between a fungus and an alga or cyanobacterium.
Asea snail,Littoraria irrorata, covered in lichen. This snail farms intertidalascomycetous fungi
See also:Marine fungi,Mycoplankton, andEvolution of fungi

Over 1500 species offungi are known from marine environments.[109] These are parasitic onmarine algae or animals, or aresaprobes feeding on dead organic matter from algae, corals, protozoan cysts, sea grasses, and other substrata.[110] Spores of many species have special appendages which facilitate attachment to the substratum.[111] Marine fungi can also be found insea foam and aroundhydrothermal areas of the ocean.[112] A diverse range of unusual secondarymetabolites is produced by marine fungi.[113]

Mycoplankton aresaprotropic members of theplankton communities ofmarine andfreshwaterecosystems.[114][115] They are composed offilamentous free-livingfungi and yeasts associated with planktonic particles orphytoplankton.[116] Similar tobacterioplankton, these aquatic fungi play a significant role inheterotrophicmineralization andnutrient cycling.[117] While mostly microscopic, some mycoplankton can be up to 20 mm in diameter and over 50 mm in length.[118]

A typical milliliter of seawater contains about 103 to 104 fungal cells.[119] This number is greater in coastal ecosystems andestuaries due to nutritional runoff from terrestrial communities. A higher diversity of mycoplankton is found around coasts and in surface waters down to 1000 metres, with avertical profile that depends on how abundantphytoplankton is.[120][121] This profile changes between seasons due to changes in nutrient availability.[122] Marine fungi survive in a constant oxygen deficient environment, and therefore depend on oxygen diffusion byturbulence and oxygen generated byphotosynthetic organisms.[123]

Marine fungi can be classified as:[123]

Lichens aremutualistic associations between a fungus, usually anascomycete, and an alga or acyanobacterium. Several lichens are found in marine environments.[124] Many more occur in thesplash zone, where they occupy different vertical zones depending on how tolerant they are to submersion.[125] Some lichens live a long time; one species has been dated at 8,600 years.[126] However their lifespan is difficult to measure because what defines the same lichen is not precise.[127] Lichens grow by vegetatively breaking off a piece, which may or may not be defined as the same lichen, and two lichens of different ages can merge, raising the issue of whether it is the same lichen.[127]

Thesea snailLittoraria irrorata damages plants ofSpartina in the sea marshes where it lives, which enables spores of intertidal ascomycetous fungi to colonise the plant. The snail then eats the fungal growth in preference to the grass itself.[128]

According to fossil records, fungi date back to the lateProterozoic era 900-570 million years ago. Fossil marine lichens 600 million years old have been discovered in China.[129] It has been hypothesized that mycoplankton evolved from terrestrial fungi, likely in thePaleozoic era (390 million years ago).[130]

Marine microanimals

[edit]
See also:Microanimal andIchthyoplankton
External videos
video iconCopepods: The Diatom-Devouring King of Plankton
video iconGastrotrichs: Four-day-old grandmothers
video iconRotifers: Charmingly bizarre and often ignored
video iconTardigrades: Chubby, misunderstood, and not immortal

As juveniles, animals develop from microscopic stages, which can includespores,eggs andlarvae. At least one microscopic animal group, theparasiticcnidarianMyxozoa, is unicellular in its adult form, and includes marine species. Other adult marinemicroanimals are multicellular. Microscopic adultarthropods are more commonly found inland in freshwater, but there are marine species as well. Microscopic adult marinecrustaceans include somecopepods,cladocera andtardigrades (water bears). Some marinenematodes androtifers are also too small to be recognised with the naked eye, as are manyloricifera, including the recently discoveredanaerobic species that spend their lives in ananoxic environment.[131][132] Copepods contribute more to thesecondary productivity andcarbon sink of the world oceans than any other group of organisms.

  • Marine microanimals
  • Over 10,000 marine species are copepods, small, often microscopic crustaceans
    Over 10,000 marine species arecopepods, small, often microscopiccrustaceans
  • Darkfield photo of a gastrotrich, 0.06-3.0 mm long, a worm-like animal living between sediment particles
    Darkfield photo of agastrotrich, 0.06-3.0 mm long, a worm-like animal living between sediment particles
  • Armoured Pliciloricus enigmaticus, about 0.2 mm long, live in spaces between marine gravel
    ArmouredPliciloricus enigmaticus, about 0.2 mm long, live in spaces between marine gravel
  • Rotifers, usually 0.1–0.5 mm long, may look like protists but are multicellular and belong to the Animalia
    Rotifers, usually 0.1–0.5 mm long, may look like protists but are multicellular and belong to the Animalia
  • Tardigrades (water bears), about 0.5 mm long, are among the most resilient animals known
    Tardigrades (water bears), about 0.5 mm long, are among the most resilient animals known

Primary producers

[edit]
Composite image showing the global distribution of photosynthesis, including both oceanicphytoplankton and terrestrialvegetation. Dark red and blue-green indicate regions of high photosynthetic activity in the ocean and on land, respectively.
Main article:Marine primary production
See also:Evolution of photosynthesis

Primary producers are theautotroph organisms that make their own food instead of eating other organisms. This means primary producers become the starting point in thefood chain forheterotroph organisms that do eat other organisms. Some marine primary producers are specialised bacteria and archaea which arechemotrophs, making their own food by gathering aroundhydrothermal vents andcold seeps and usingchemosynthesis. However most marineprimary production comes from organisms which usephotosynthesis on the carbon dioxide dissolved in the water. This process uses energy from sunlight to convert water andcarbon dioxide[133]: 186–187  into sugars that can be used both as a source of chemical energy and of organic molecules that are used in the structural components of cells.[133]: 1242  Marine primary producers are important because they underpin almost all marine animal life by generating most of theoxygen and food that provide other organisms with the chemical energy they need to exist.

The principal marine primary producers arecyanobacteria,algae and marine plants. Theoxygen released as a by-product of photosynthesis is needed bynearly all living things to carry outcellular respiration. In addition, primary producers are influential in the globalcarbon andwater cycles. They stabilize coastal areas and can provide habitats for marine animals. The termdivision has been traditionally used instead ofphylum when discussing primary producers, but theInternational Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants now accepts both terms as equivalents.[134]

Cyanobacteria

[edit]
Cyanobacteria
Cyanobacteria from amicrobial mat. Cyanobacteria were the first organisms to release oxygen via photosynthesis
The tiny cyanobacteriumProchlorococcus is a major contributor to atmospheric oxygen
NASA image of a largebloom ofNodularia cyanobacteria swirling in the Baltic Sea[135]
External videos
video iconHow cyanobacteria took over the world

Cyanobacteria were the first organisms to evolve an ability to turn sunlight into chemical energy. They form a phylum (division) of bacteria which range from unicellular tofilamentous and includecolonial species. They are found almost everywhere on earth: in damp soil, in both freshwater and marine environments, and even on Antarctic rocks.[136] In particular, some species occur as drifting cells floating in the ocean, and as such were amongst the first of thephytoplankton.

The first primary producers that used photosynthesis were oceaniccyanobacteria about 2.3 billion years ago.[137][138] The release of molecularoxygen bycyanobacteria as a by-product of photosynthesis induced global changes in the Earth's environment. Because oxygen was toxic to most life on Earth at the time, this led to the near-extinction ofoxygen-intolerant organisms, adramatic change which redirected the evolution of the major animal and plant species.[139]

The tiny (0.6μm) marine cyanobacteriumProchlorococcus, discovered in 1986, forms today an important part of the base of the oceanfood chain and accounts for much of the photosynthesis of the open ocean[140] and an estimated 20% of the oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere.[141] It is possibly the most plentiful genus on Earth: a single millilitre of surface seawater may contain 100,000 cells or more.[142]

Originally, biologists thoughtcyanobacteria was algae, and referred to it as "blue-green algae". The more recent view is that cyanobacteria are bacteria, and hence are not even in the sameKingdom as algae. Most authorities exclude allprokaryotes, and hence cyanobacteria from the definition of algae.[143][144]

Algae

[edit]

Algae is an informal term for a widespread and diverse group of photosyntheticprotists which are not necessarily closely related and are thuspolyphyletic. Marine algae can be divided into six groups:green,red andbrown algae,euglenophytes,dinoflagellates anddiatoms.

Dinoflagellates and diatoms are important components of marine algae and have their own sections below.Euglenophytes are a phylum of unicellular flagellates with only a few marine members.

Not all algae are microscopic. Green, red and brown algae all have multicellular macroscopic forms that make up the familiarseaweeds.Green algae, an informal group, contains about 8,000 recognised species.[145] Many species live most of their lives as single cells or are filamentous, while others formcolonies made up from long chains of cells, or are highly differentiated macroscopic seaweeds.Red algae, a (disputed) phylum contains about 7,000 recognised species,[146] mostlymulticellular and including many notable seaweeds.[146][147]Brown algae form aclass containing about 2,000 recognised species,[148] mostlymulticellular and including many seaweeds such askelp.Unlike higher plants, algae lack roots, stems, or leaves. They can be classified by size asmicroalgae ormacroalgae.

Microalgae are the microscopic types of algae, not visible to the naked eye. They are mostlyunicellular species which exist as individuals or in chains or groups, though some aremulticellular. Microalgae are important components of the marine protistsdiscussed above, as well as the phytoplanktondiscussed below. They are verydiverse. It has been estimated there are 200,000-800,000 species of which about 50,000 species have been described.[149] Depending on the species, their sizes range from a few micrometers (μm) to a few hundred micrometers. They are specially adapted to an environment dominated by viscous forces.

Unicellular organisms are usually microscopic. There are exceptions.Mermaid's wineglass, a genus of subtropicalgreen algae, is single-celled but remarkably large and complex in form with a single large nucleus, making it a model organism for studyingcell biology.[150] Another single-celled algae,Caulerpa taxifolia, has the appearance of a vascular plant including "leaves" arranged neatly up stalks like a fern. Selective breeding in aquariums to produce hardier strains resulted in an accidental release into the Mediterranean where it has become aninvasive species known colloquially askiller algae.[151]

Macroalgae are the larger,multicellular and more visible types of algae, commonly calledseaweeds. Seaweeds usually grow in shallow coastal waters where they are anchored to the seafloor by aholdfast. Like microalgae, macroalgae (seaweeds) can be regarded asmarine protists since they are not true plants. But they are not microorganisms, so they are not within the scope of this article.

Marine microplankton

[edit]
Six relatively large variously shaped organisms with dozens of small light-colored dots all against a dark background. Some of the organisms have antennae that are longer than their bodies.
Plankton are drifting or floating organisms that cannot swim effectively against a current, and include organisms from most areas of life:bacteria,archaea,algae,protozoa andanimals.
Red, orange, yellow and green represent areas where algal blooms abound. Blue areas represent nutrient-poor zones where phytoplankton exist in lower concentrations.
See also:Marine protists
Further information:Bacterioplankton,Ichthyoplankton,Mycoplankton, andPhycosphere

Plankton (from Greek forwanderers) are a diverse group of organisms that live in thewater column of large bodies of water but cannot swim against a current. As a result, they wander or drift with the currents.[153] Plankton are defined by theirecological niche, not by anyphylogenetic ortaxonomic classification. They are a crucial source of food for many marine animals, fromforage fish towhales. Plankton can be divided into a plant-like component and an animal component.

Phytoplankton

[edit]
Phytoplankton – such as this colony ofChaetoceros socialis – naturally gives off red fluorescent light which dissipates excess solar energy they cannot consume through photosynthesis. This glow can be detected by satellites as an indicator of how efficiently ocean phytoplankton is photosynthesising.[154][155]

Phytoplankton are the plant-like components of the plankton community ("phyto" comes from the Greek forplant). They areautotrophic (self-feeding), meaning they generate their own food and do not need to consume other organisms.

Phytoplankton perform three crucial functions: they generate nearly half of the world atmospheric oxygen, they regulate ocean and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and they form the base of the marinefood web. When conditions are right,blooms of phytoplankton algae can occur in surface waters. Phytoplankton arer-strategists which grow rapidly and can double their population every day. The blooms can become toxic and deplete the water of oxygen. However, phytoplankton numbers are usually kept in check by the phytoplankton exhausting available nutrients and by grazing zooplankton.[156]

Phytoplankton consist mainly of microscopic photosyntheticeukaryotes which inhabit the upper sunlit layer in all oceans. They need sunlight so they can photosynthesize. Most phytoplankton are single-celled algae, but other phytoplankton are bacteria and some areprotists.[157] Phytoplankton includecyanobacteria (above),diatoms, various other types ofalgae (red, green, brown, and yellow-green),dinoflagellates,euglenoids,coccolithophorids,cryptomonads,chlorophytes,prasinophytes, andsilicoflagellates. They form the base of theprimary production that drives the oceanfood web, and account for half of the current global primary production, more than the terrestrial forests.[158]

  • Phytoplankton
  • Phytoplankton are the foundation of the ocean food chain
    Phytoplankton are the foundation of the ocean food chain
  • They come in many shapes and sizes.
    They come in many shapes and sizes.
  • Colonial phytoplankton
    Colonial phytoplankton
  • The cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus accounts for much of the ocean's primary production
    The cyanobacteriumProchlorococcus accounts for much of the ocean's primary production
  • Green cyanobacteria scum washed up on a rock in California
    Greencyanobacteria scum washed up on a rock in California

Diatoms

[edit]
Diatom shapes
Drawings byHaeckel 1904 (click for details)

Diatoms form a (disputed) phylum containing about 100,000 recognised species of mainly unicellular algae. Diatoms generate about 20 per cent of the oxygen produced on the planet each year,[93] take in over 6.7 billion metric tons ofsilicon each year from the waters in which they live,[159] and contribute nearly half of the organic material found in the oceans.

  • Diatoms are one of the most common types of phytoplankton
    Diatoms are one of the most common types of phytoplankton
  • Their protective shells (frustles) are made of silicon
    Their protective shells (frustles) are made of silicon
  • They come in many shapes and sizes
    They come in many shapes and sizes
Diatoms
Diatoms have asilica shell (frustule) with radial (centric) or bilateral (pennate) symmetry

Diatoms are enclosed in protective silica (glass) shells calledfrustules. Each frustule is made from two interlocking parts covered with tiny holes through which the diatom exchanges nutrients and wastes.[156] The frustules of dead diatoms drift to the ocean floor where, over millions of years, they can build up as much ashalf a mile deep.[160]

  • Silicified frustule of a pennate diatom with two overlapping halves
    Silicified frustule of a pennate diatom with two overlapping halves
  • Guinardia delicatula, a diatom responsible for algal blooms in the North Sea and the English Channel[161]
    Guinardia delicatula, a diatom responsible foralgal blooms in the North Sea and the English Channel[161]
  • Fossil diatom
    Fossil diatom
  • There are over 100,000 species of diatoms which account for 50% of the ocean's primary production
    There are over 100,000 species ofdiatoms which account for 50% of the ocean's primary production
Structure of a centric diatom frustule[162]
External videos
video iconDiatoms: Tiny factories you can see from space

Coccolithophores

[edit]

Coccolithophores are minute unicellular photosynthetic protists with two flagella for locomotion. Most of them are protected by a shell covered with ornate circular plates or scales calledcoccoliths. The coccoliths are made from calcium carbonate. The calcite shells are important to the marine carbon cycle.[163] The term coccolithophore derives from the Greek for aseed carrying stone, referring to their small size and the coccolith stones they carry. Under the right conditions they bloom, like other phytoplankton, and can turn the ocean milky white.[164]

Microbial rhodopsin

[edit]
Model of the energy generating mechanism in marine bacteria
(1) When sunlight strikes a rhodopsin molecule
(2) it changes its configuration so a proton is expelled from the cell
(3) the chemical potential causes the proton to flow back to the cell
(4) thus generating energy
(5) in the form ofadenosine triphosphate.[165]
Main article:Microbial rhodopsin

Phototrophic metabolism relies on one of three energy-converting pigments:chlorophyll,bacteriochlorophyll, andretinal. Retinal is thechromophore found inrhodopsins. The significance of chlorophyll in converting light energy has been written about for decades, but phototrophy based on retinal pigments is just beginning to be studied.[166]

Halobacteria insalt evaporation ponds coloured purple bybacteriorhodopsin[167]

In 2000 a team of microbiologists led byEdward DeLong made a crucial discovery in the understanding of the marine carbon and energy cycles. They discovered a gene in several species of bacteria[168][169] responsible for production of the proteinrhodopsin, previously unheard of in bacteria. These proteins found in the cell membranes are capable of converting light energy to biochemical energy due to a change in configuration of the rhodopsin molecule as sunlight strikes it, causing the pumping of aproton from inside out and a subsequent inflow that generates the energy.[170] The archaeal-like rhodopsins have subsequently been found among different taxa, protists as well as in bacteria and archaea, though they are rare in complexmulticellular organisms.[171][172][173]

Research in 2019 shows these "sun-snatching bacteria" are more widespread than previously thought and could change how oceans are affected by global warming. "The findings break from the traditional interpretation of marine ecology found in textbooks, which states that nearly all sunlight in the ocean is captured by chlorophyll in algae. Instead, rhodopsin-equipped bacteria function like hybrid cars, powered by organic matter when available — as most bacteria are — and by sunlight when nutrients are scarce."[174][166]

There is anastrobiological conjecture called thePurple Earth hypothesis which surmises that original life forms on Earth were retinal-based rather than chlorophyll-based, which would have made the Earth appear purple instead of green.[175][176]

Redfield and f- ratios

[edit]

During the 1930sAlfred C. Redfield found similarities between the composition of elements in phytoplankton and the major dissolved nutrients in the deep ocean.[177] Redfield proposed that the ratio of carbon to nitrogen to phosphorus (106:16:1) in the ocean was controlled by the phytoplankton's requirements, as phytoplankton subsequently release nitrogen and phosphorus as they remineralize. This ratio has become known as theRedfield ratio, and is used as a fundamental principle in describing thestoichiometry of seawater and phytoplankton evolution.[178]

However, the Redfield ratio is not a universal value and can change with things like geographical latitude.[179] Based on allocation of resources, phytoplankton can be classified into three different growth strategies: survivalist, bloomer and generalist. Survivalist phytoplankton has a high N:P ratio (>30) and contains an abundance of resource-acquisition machinery to sustain growth under scarce resources. Bloomer phytoplankton has a low N:P ratio (<10), contains a high proportion of growth machinery and is adapted to exponential growth. Generalist phytoplankton has similar N:P to the Redfield ratio and contain relatively equal resource-acquisition and growth machinery.[178]

Thef-ratio is the fraction of totalprimary production fuelled bynitrate (as opposed to that fuelled by othernitrogencompounds such asammonium). The ratio was originally defined by Richard Eppley and Bruce Peterson in one of the firstpapers estimating global oceanic production.[180]

Zooplankton

[edit]

Zooplankton are the animal component of the planktonic community ("zoo" comes from the Greek foranimal). They areheterotrophic (other-feeding), meaning they cannot produce their own food and must consume instead other plants or animals as food. In particular, this means they eat phytoplankton.

Zooplankton are generally larger than phytoplankton, mostly still microscopic but some can be seen with the naked eye. Manyprotozoans (single-celledprotists that prey on other microscopic life) are zooplankton, includingzooflagellates,foraminiferans,radiolarians, somedinoflagellates andmarine microanimals. Macroscopic zooplankton (not generally covered in this article) include pelagiccnidarians,ctenophores,molluscs,arthropods andtunicates, as well as planktonicarrow worms andbristle worms.

Microzooplankton: major grazers of the plankton...

Many species ofprotozoa (eukaryotes) andbacteria (prokaryotes) prey on other microorganisms; the feeding mode is evidently ancient, and evolved many times in both groups.[181][182][183] Among freshwater and marinezooplankton, whether single-celled or multi-cellular, predatory grazing onphytoplankton and smaller zooplankton is common, and found in many species ofnanoflagellates,dinoflagellates,ciliates,rotifers, a diverse range ofmeroplankton animal larvae, and two groups of crustaceans, namelycopepods andcladocerans.[184]

Radiolarians

[edit]
Radiolarian shapes
Drawings byHaeckel 1904 (click for details)

Radiolarians are unicellular predatoryprotists encased in elaborate globular shells usually made of silica and pierced with holes. Their name comes from the Latin for "radius". They catch prey by extending parts of their body through the holes. As with the silica frustules of diatoms, radiolarian shells can sink to the ocean floor when radiolarians die and become preserved as part of theocean sediment. These remains, asmicrofossils, provide valuable information about past oceanic conditions.[185]

  • Like diatoms, radiolarians come in many shapes
    Like diatoms, radiolarians come in many shapes
  • Also like diatoms, radiolarian shells are usually made of silicate
    Also like diatoms, radiolarian shells are usually made of silicate
  • However acantharian radiolarians have shells made from strontium sulfate crystals
    Howeveracantharian radiolarians have shells made fromstrontium sulfate crystals
  • Cutaway schematic diagram of a spherical radiolarian shell
    Cutaway schematic diagram of a spherical radiolarian shell
  • Cladococcus abietinus
    Cladococcus abietinus
Turing and radiolarian morphology
Shell of a spherical radiolarian
Shell micrographs
Computer simulations ofTuring patterns on a sphere closely replicate some radiolarian shell patterns[186]
External videos
video iconRadiolarian geometry
video iconErnst Haeckel's radiolarian engravings

Foraminiferans

[edit]
Foraminiferan shapes
Drawings byHaeckel 1904 (click for details)

Like radiolarians,foraminiferans (forams for short) are single-celled predatory protists, also protected with shells that have holes in them. Their name comes from the Latin for "hole bearers". Their shells, often calledtests, are chambered (forams add more chambers as they grow). The shells are usually made of calcite, but are sometimes made ofagglutinated sediment particles orchiton, and (rarely) of silica. Most forams are benthic, but about 40 species are planktic.[187] They are widely researched with well established fossil records which allow scientists to infer a lot about past environments and climates.[185]

Foraminiferans
...can have more than one nucleus
...and defensive spines
Foraminiferans are important unicellular zooplanktonprotists, with calcium tests
External videos
video iconforaminiferans
video iconForaminiferal networks and growth

A number of forams aremixotrophic (see below). These have unicellularalgae asendosymbionts, from diverse lineages such as thegreen algae,red algae,golden algae,diatoms, anddinoflagellates.[187] Mixotrophic foraminifers are particularly common in nutrient-poor oceanic waters.[189] Some forams arekleptoplastic, retainingchloroplasts from ingested algae to conductphotosynthesis.[190]

Amoeba

[edit]
Amoeba engulfing a diatom

Amoeba can be shelled (testate) or naked.

Ciliates

[edit]
Ciliate shapes
Drawings byHaeckel 1904 (click for details)
Tintinnopsis campanula

Mixotrophs

[edit]
Mixotrophic radiolarians
Acantharian radiolarian hostsPhaeocystis symbionts
WhitePhaeocystis algal foam washing up on a beach
See also:Mixotrophic dinoflagellate

Amixotroph is an organism that can use a mix of differentsources of energy and carbon, instead of having a single trophic mode on the continuum from completeautotrophy at one end toheterotrophy at the other. It is estimated that mixotrophs comprise more than half of all microscopic plankton.[192] There are two types of eukaryotic mixotrophs: those with their ownchloroplasts, and those withendosymbionts—and others that acquire them throughkleptoplasty or by enslaving the entire phototrophic cell.[193]

The distinction between plants and animals often breaks down in very small organisms. Possible combinations arephoto- andchemotrophy,litho- andorganotrophy,auto- andheterotrophy or other combinations of these. Mixotrophs can be eithereukaryotic orprokaryotic.[194] They can take advantage of different environmental conditions.[195]

Recent studies of marine microzooplankton found 30–45% of the ciliate abundance was mixotrophic, and up to 65% of the amoeboid, foram and radiolarianbiomass was mixotrophic.[87]

Phaeocystis is an important algal genus found as part of the marinephytoplankton around the world. It has apolymorphic life cycle, ranging from free-living cells to large colonies.[196] It has the ability to form floating colonies, where hundreds of cells are embedded in a gel matrix, which can increase massively in size duringblooms.[197] As a result,Phaeocystis is an important contributor to the marinecarbon[198] andsulfur cycles.[199]Phaeocystis species are endosymbionts toacantharian radiolarians.[200][201]

Mixotrophic plankton that combine phototrophy and heterotrophy – table based on Stoecker et al., 2017[202]
General typesDescriptionExampleFurther examples
BacterioplanktonPhotoheterotrophicbacterioplanktonVibrio choleraeRoseobacter spp.
Erythrobacter spp.
Gammaproteobacterial clade OM60
Widespread among bacteria and archaea
PhytoplanktonCalledconstitutive mixotrophs by Mitra et al., 2016.[203] Phytoplankton that eat: photosynthetic protists with inheritedplastids and the capacity to ingest prey.Ochromonas speciesOchromonas spp.
Prymnesium parvum
Dinoflagellate examples:Fragilidium subglobosum,Heterocapsa triquetra,Karlodinium veneficum,Neoceratium furca,Prorocentrum minimum
ZooplanktonCallednonconstitutive mixotrophs by Mitra et al., 2016.[203] Zooplankton that are photosynthetic: microzooplankton or metazoan zooplankton that acquire phototrophy through chloroplast retentiona or maintenance of algal endosymbionts.
GeneralistsProtists that retain chloroplasts and rarely other organelles from many algal taxaMostoligotrich ciliates that retain plastidsa
Specialists1. Protists that retain chloroplasts and sometimes other organelles from one algal species or very closely related algal speciesDinophysis acuminataDinophysis spp.
Myrionecta rubra
2. Protists or zooplankton with algal endosymbionts of only one algal species or very closely related algal speciesNoctiluca scintillansMetazooplankton with algalendosymbionts
Most mixotrophicRhizaria (Acantharea,Polycystinea, andForaminifera)
GreenNoctiluca scintillans
aChloroplast (or plastid) retention = sequestration = enslavement. Some plastid-retaining species also retain other organelles and prey cytoplasm.

Dinoflagellates

[edit]
Dinoflagellate shapes
Unarmored dinoflagellates Kofoid (1921)
Haeckel Peridinea (1904)
See also:Mixotrophic dinoflagellate andPredatory dinoflagellate

Dinoflagellates are part of thealgae group, and form a phylum of unicellular flagellates with about 2,000 marine species.[204] The name comes from the Greek "dinos" meaningwhirling and the Latin "flagellum" meaning awhip orlash. This refers to the two whip-like attachments (flagella) used for forward movement. Most dinoflagellates are protected with red-brown, cellulose armour. Like other phytoplankton, dinoflagellates arer-strategists which under right conditions canbloom and createred tides.Excavates may be the most basal flagellate lineage.[102]

By trophic orientation dinoflagellates cannot be uniformly categorized. Some dinoflagellates are known to bephotosynthetic, but a large fraction of these are in factmixotrophic, combining photosynthesis with ingestion of prey (phagotrophy).[205] Some species areendosymbionts of marine animals and other protists, and play an important part in the biology ofcoral reefs. Others predate other protozoa, and a few forms are parasitic. Many dinoflagellates aremixotrophic and could also be classified as phytoplankton.

The toxic dinoflagellateDinophysis acuta acquire chloroplasts from its prey. "It cannot catch the cryptophytes by itself, and instead relies on ingesting ciliates such as the redMyrionecta rubra, which sequester their chloroplasts from a specific cryptophyte clade (Geminigera/Plagioselmis/Teleaulax)".[202]

  • Gyrodinium, one of the few naked dinoflagellates which lack armour
    Gyrodinium, one of the few naked dinoflagellates which lack armour
  • The dinoflagellate Protoperidinium extrudes a large feeding veil to capture prey
    The dinoflagellateProtoperidinium extrudes a large feeding veil to capture prey
  • Nassellarian radiolarians can be in symbiosis with dinoflagellates
    Nassellarian radiolarians can be in symbiosis with dinoflagellates
  • The dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuta
    The dinoflagellateDinophysis acuta
Asurf wave at night sparkles with blue light due to the presence of a bioluminescent dinoflagellate, such asLingulodinium polyedrum
Suggested explanation for glowing seas[206]
Dinoflagellates
Armoured
Unarmoured
Traditionally dinoflagellates have been presented as armoured or unarmoured

Dinoflagellates often live insymbiosis with other organisms. Manynassellarian radiolarians housedinoflagellatesymbionts within their tests.[207] The nassellarian providesammonium andcarbon dioxide for the dinoflagellate, while the dinoflagellate provides the nassellarian with a mucous membrane useful for hunting and protection against harmful invaders.[208] There is evidence fromDNA analysis that dinoflagellate symbiosis with radiolarians evolved independently from other dinoflagellate symbioses, such as withforaminifera.[209]

Some dinoflagellates arebioluminescent. At night, ocean water can light up internally andsparkle with blue light because of these dinoflagellates.[210][211] Bioluminescent dinoflagellates possessscintillons, individualcytoplasmic bodies which containdinoflagellate luciferase, the main enzyme involved in the luminescence. The luminescence, sometimes calledthe phosphorescence of the sea, occurs as brief (0.1 sec) blue flashes or sparks when individual scintillons are stimulated, usually by mechanical disturbances from, for example, a boat or a swimmer or surf.[212]

Marine sediments and microfossils

[edit]
Stone dagger ofÖtzi the Iceman who lived during theCopper Age. The blade is made ofchert containing radiolarians, calcispheres, calpionellids and a few sponge spicules. The presence ofcalpionellids, which are extinct, was used to date this dagger.[216]
Further information:Marine sediments,microfossils, andprotist shells

Sediments at the bottom of the ocean have two main origins, terrigenous and biogenous.

Terrigenous sediments account for about 45% of the total marine sediment, and originate in the erosion ofrocks on land, transported by rivers and land runoff, windborne dust, volcanoes, or grinding by glaciers.

Biogenous sediments account for the other 55% of the total sediment, and originate in the skeletal remains ofmarine protists (single-celled plankton and benthos microorganisms). Much smaller amounts of precipitated minerals and meteoric dust can also be present.Ooze, in the context of a marine sediment, does not refer to the consistency of the sediment but to its biological origin. The term ooze was originally used byJohn Murray, the "father of modern oceanography", who proposed the termradiolarian ooze for the silica deposits of radiolarian shells brought to the surface during theChallenger expedition.[217] Abiogenic ooze is apelagic sediment containing at least 30 per cent from the skeletal remains of marine organisms.

Main types of biogenic ooze
typemineral
forms
protist
involved
name of skeletontypical size
(mm)
Siliceous oozeSiO2
silica
quartz
glass
opal
chert
diatomfrustule0.002 to 0.2[218]diatommicrofossil from 40 million years ago
radiolariantest or shell0.1 to 0.2elaborate silica shell of a radiolarian
Calcareous oozeCaCO3
calcite
aragonite
limestone
marble
chalk
foraminiferantest or shell< 1Calcifiedtest of a planktic foraminiferan. There are about 10,000 living species of foraminiferans[219]
coccolithophorecoccoliths< 0.1[220]Coccolithophores are the largest global source of biogenic calcium carbonate, and significantly contribute to the global carbon cycle.[221] They are the main constituent of chalk deposits such as thewhite cliffs of Dover.
  • Thickness of marine sediments
    Thickness of marine sediments
  • Distribution of sediment types on the seafloor Within each colored area, the type of material shown is what dominates, although other materials are also likely to be present. For further information, see here
    Distribution of sediment types on the seafloor
    Within each colored area, the type of material shown is what dominates, although other materials are also likely to be present.
    For further information,see here

Marine microbenthos

[edit]
Archaea rock – this deep ocean rock harboured worms that consumed methane-eating archaea
See also:Seabed § Sediments,bioturbation, andbioirrigation

Marine microbenthos are microorganisms that live in thebenthic zone of the ocean – that live near or on the seafloor, or within or on surface seafloor sediments. The wordbenthos comes from Greek, meaning "depth of the sea". Microbenthos are found everywhere on or about the seafloor of continental shelves, as well as in deeper waters, with greater diversity in or on seafloor sediments. In shallow waters,seagrass meadows, coral reefs and kelp forests provide particularly rich habitats. Inphotic zones benthic diatoms dominate as photosynthetic organisms. Inintertidal zones changingtides strongly control opportunities for microbenthos.

  • Elphidium a widespread abundant genus of benthic forams
    Elphidium a widespread abundant genus of benthic forams
  • Heterohelix, an extinct genus of benthic forams
    Heterohelix, an extinct genus of benthic forams

Both foraminifera and diatoms haveplanktonic andbenthic forms, that is, they can drift in thewater column or live on sediment at the bottom of the ocean. Either way, their shells end up on the seafloor after they die. These shells are widely used asclimate proxies. The chemical composition of the shells are a consequence of the chemical composition of the ocean at the time the shells were formed. Past water temperatures can be also be inferred from the ratios of stableoxygen isotopes in the shells, since lighter isotopes evaporate more readily in warmer water leaving the heavier isotopes in the shells. Information about past climates can be inferred further from the abundance of forams and diatoms, since they tend to be more abundant in warm water.[223]

The suddenextinction event which killed the dinosaurs 66 million years ago also rendered extinct three-quarters of all other animal and plant species. However, deep-sea benthic forams flourished in the aftermath. In 2020 it was reported that researchers have examined the chemical composition of thousands of samples of these benthic forams and used their findings to build the most detailed climate record of Earth ever.[224][225]

Someendoliths have extremely long lives. In 2013 researchers reported evidence of endoliths in the ocean floor, perhaps millions of years old, with a generation time of 10,000 years.[226] These are slowly metabolizing and not in a dormant state. SomeActinomycetota found inSiberia are estimated to be half a million years old.[227][228][229]

Marine microbiomes

[edit]
Main article:Marine microbiomes

Symbiosis and holobionts

[edit]
Main types of microbial symbioses
(A) Microbial interactions range from mutually beneficial to harmful for one or more partners. Blue double headed arrows highlight that relationships can move between classifications often influenced by environmental conditions. (B) Host-microbe symbioses should be considered within the context of microbial communities where the host participates in multiple and often different symbiotic relationships. (C) Microbial communities are influenced by a variety of microbe-microbe symbioses ranging from cooperation (e.g., syntrophy or co-metabolism) to competition. Arrows depict generally beneficial (blue) and detrimental (red) outcomes for one (single arrowhead) or both (double arrowhead) members. Note as with host-microbe symbioses these relationships can be viewed as fluid and influenced by environmental conditions.[230]
Further information:marine microbial symbiosis andholobiont

The concept of the holobiont was initially defined byDr. Lynn Margulis in her 1991 bookSymbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation as an assemblage of ahost and the many other species living in or around it, which together form a discreteecological unit.[231] The components of a holobiont are individual species orbionts, while the combinedgenome of all bionts is thehologenome.[232]

The concept has subsequently evolved since this original definition,[233] with the focus moving to the microbial species associated with the host. Thus the holobiont includes the host,virome,microbiome, and other members, all of which contribute in some way to the function of the whole.[234][235] A holobiont typically includes aeukaryotehost and all of thesymbioticviruses,bacteria,fungi, etc. that live on or inside it.[236]

However, there iscontroversy over whether holobionts can be viewed as single evolutionary units.[237]

Reef-building corals are well-studied holobionts that include the coral itself (a eukaryoticinvertebrate within classAnthozoa),photosyntheticdinoflagellates calledzooxanthellae (Symbiodinium), and associated bacteria and viruses.[238] Co-evolutionary patterns exist for coral microbial communities and coral phylogeny.[239]

Marine food web

[edit]
Further information:marine food web

Marine microorganisms play central roles in themarine food web.

Theviral shunt pathway is a mechanism that prevents marine microbialparticulate organic matter (POM) from migrating uptrophic levels by recycling them intodissolved organic matter (DOM), which can be readily taken up by microorganisms.[244] Viral shunting helps maintain diversity within the microbial ecosystem by preventing a single species of marine microbe from dominating the micro-environment.[245] The DOM recycled by the viral shunt pathway is comparable to the amount generated by the other main sources of marine DOM.[246]

Roles of fungi in the marine carbon cycle[247]
Theviral shunt pathway facilitates the flow ofdissolved organic matter (DOM) andparticulate organic matter (POM) through the marine food web
External videos
video iconThe secret Life of plankton
  • Pelagibacter ubique, the most abundant bacteria in the ocean, plays a major role in the global carbon cycle.
    Pelagibacter ubique, the most abundant bacteria in the ocean, plays a major role in the globalcarbon cycle.
  • Marine snow is the shower of organic particles that falls from upper waters to the deep ocean[248] It is a major exporter of carbon.
    Marine snow is the shower of organic particles that falls from upper waters to the deep ocean[248] It is a major exporter of carbon.
Size and classification of marine particles[249]
Adapted from Simon et al., 2002.[250]

Niche communities

[edit]
Black smoker in the High Rise portion of theEndeavour Hydrothermal Vents.
Bacteria can be beneficial. ThisPompeii worm, anextremophile found only athydrothermal vents, has a protective cover ofsymbiotic bacteria.
See also:Sea ice microbial communities andHydrothermal vent microbial communities

Sea ice microbial communities (SIMCO) refer to groups ofmicroorganisms living within and at the interfaces ofsea ice at the poles. The ice matrix they inhabit has strong vertical gradients of salinity, light, temperature and nutrients. Sea ice chemistry is most influenced by the salinity of the brine which affects thepH and the concentration of dissolved nutrients and gases. Thebrine formed during the melting sea ice creates pores and channels in the sea ice in which these microbes can live. As a result of these gradients and dynamic conditions, a higher abundance of microbes are found in the lower layer of the ice, although some are found in the middle and upper layers.[251]

Hydrothermal vents are located where thetectonic plates are moving apart and spreading. This allows water from the ocean to enter into the crust of the earth where it is heated by the magma. The increasing pressure and temperature forces the water back out of these openings, on the way out, the water accumulates dissolved minerals and chemicals from the rocks that it encounters. Vents can be characterized by temperature and chemical composition asdiffuse vents which release clear relatively cool water usually below 30 °C, aswhite smokers which emit milky coloured water at warmer temperatures, about 200-330 °C, and asblack smokers which emit water darkened by accumulated precipitates of sulfide at hot temperatures, about 300-400 °C.[252]

Hydrothermal vent microbial communities are microscopic unicellular organisms that live and reproduce in the chemically distinct area around hydrothermal vents. These include organisms inmicrobial mats, free floating cells, and bacteria inendosymbiotic relationships with animals. Because there is no sunlight at these depths, energy is provided bychemosynthesis where symbiotic bacteria and archaea form the bottom of the food chain and are able to support a variety of organisms such asgiant tube worms andPompeii worms. These organisms utilize this symbiotic relationship in order to utilize and obtain the chemical energy that is released at these hydrothermal vent areas.[253]Chemolithoautotrophic bacteria can derive nutrients and energy from the geological activity at a hydrothermal vent to fix carbon into organic forms.[254]

Viruses are also a part of the hydrothermal vent microbial community and their influence on the microbial ecology in these ecosystems is a burgeoning field of research.[255] Viruses are the most abundant life in the ocean, harboring the greatest reservoir of genetic diversity.[256] As their infections are often fatal, they constitute a significant source of mortality and thus have widespread influence on biological oceanographic processes,evolution andbiogeochemical cycling within the ocean.[257] Evidence has been found however to indicate that viruses found in vent habitats have adopted a moremutualistic thanparasitic evolutionary strategy in order to survive the extreme and volatile environment they exist in.[258] Deep-sea hydrothermal vents were found to have high numbers of viruses indicating high viral production.[259] Like in other marine environments,deep-sea hydrothermal viruses affect abundance and diversity ofprokaryotes and therefore impact microbial biogeochemical cycling bylysing their hosts to replicate.[260] However, in contrast to their role as a source of mortality and population control, viruses have also been postulated to enhance survival of prokaryotes in extreme environments, acting as reservoirs of genetic information. The interactions of the virosphere with microorganisms under environmental stresses is therefore thought to aide microorganism survival through dispersal of host genes throughhorizontal gene transfer.[261]

Deep biosphere and dark matter

[edit]
Fluorescence microscopy of variouspicoplankton in the ocean, much of which cannot be effectively studied because they resist attempts at laboratory culture
See also:deep biosphere,rare biosphere,microbial dark matter,SLiME, andmarine cryptic interactions

Thedeep biosphere is that part of thebiosphere that resides below the first few meters of the surface. It extends at least 5 kilometers below the continental surface and 10.5 kilometers below the sea surface, with temperatures that may exceed 100 °C.

Above the surface living organisms consume organic matter and oxygen. Lower down, these are not available, so they make use of "edibles" (electron donors) such as hydrogen released from rocks by various chemical processes, methane, reduced sulfur compounds and ammonium. They "breathe"electron acceptors such as nitrates and nitrites, manganese and iron oxides, oxidized sulfur compounds and carbon dioxide.

There is very little energy at greater depths, and metabolism can be up to a million times slower than at the surface. Cells may live for thousands of years before dividing and there is no known limit to their age. The subsurface accounts for about 90% of thebiomass in bacteria and archaea, and 15% of the total biomass for the biosphere. Eukaryotes are also found, mostly microscopic, but including some multicellular life. Viruses are also present and infect the microbes.

Subsurface life environments

In 2018, researchers from theDeep Carbon Observatory announced thatlife forms, including 70% of the bacteria and archaea on Earth, totaling a biomass of 23 billion tonnescarbon, live up to4.8 km (3.0 mi) deep underground, including2.5 km (1.6 mi) below the seabed.[262][263][264] In 2019 microbial organisms were discovered living 7,900 feet (2,400 m) below the surface,breathing sulfur and eating rocks such aspyrite as their regular food source.[265][266][267] This discovery occurred in the oldest known water on Earth.[268]

These aerobic microorganisms, found deep in organically poor sediments, have been in quasi-suspended animation for maybe 100 million years

In 2020 researchers reported they had found what could be the longest-living life forms ever:aerobic microorganisms which had been inquasi-suspended animation for up to 101.5 million years. The microorganisms were found inorganically poor sediments 68.9 metres (226 feet) below theseafloor in theSouth Pacific Gyre (SPG), "the deadest spot in the ocean".[269][270]

Unidentified spherical algal microorganism, part of themicrobial dark matter

To date biologists have been unable toculture in the laboratory the vast majority of microorganisms. This applies particularly to bacteria and archaea, and is due to a lack of knowledge or ability to supply the required growth conditions.[271][272] The termmicrobial dark matter has come to be used to describe microorganisms scientists know are there but have been unable to culture, and whose properties therefore remain elusive.[271] Microbial dark matter is unrelated to thedark matter of physics and cosmology, but is so-called for the difficulty in effectively studying it. It is hard to estimate its relative magnitude, but the accepted gross estimate is that less than one per cent of microbial species in a givenecological niche is culturable. In recent years effort is being put to decipher more of the microbial dark matter by means of learning theirgenomeDNA sequence from environmental samples[273] and then by gaining insights to their metabolism from their sequenced genome, promoting the knowledge required for their cultivation.

Microbial diversity

[edit]
  • Estimates of microbial species counts in the three domains of life Bacteria are the oldest and most biodiverse group, followed by Archaea and Fungi (the most recent groups). In 1998, before awareness of the extent of microbial life had gotten underway, Robert M. May[274] estimated there were 3 million species of living organisms on the planet. But in 2016, Locey and Lennon[275] estimated the number of microorganism species could be as high as 1 trillion.[276]
    Estimates of microbial species counts in the three domains of life
    Bacteria are the oldest and most biodiverse group, followed by Archaea and Fungi (the most recent groups). In 1998, before awareness of the extent of microbial life had gotten underway,Robert M. May[274] estimated there were 3 million species of living organisms on the planet. But in 2016, Locey and Lennon[275] estimated the number of microorganism species could be as high as 1 trillion.[276]
  • Microbial diversity Comparative representation of the known and estimated (small box) and the yet unknown (large box) microbial diversity, which applies to both marine and terrestrial microorganisms. The text boxes refer to factors that adversely affect the knowledge of the microbial diversity that exists on the planet.[276]
    Microbial diversity
    Comparative representation of the known and estimated (small box) and the yet unknown (large box) microbial diversity, which applies to both marine and terrestrial microorganisms. The text boxes refer to factors that adversely affect the knowledge of the microbial diversity that exists on the planet.[276]

Sampling techniques

[edit]
See also:niskin bottle,plankton net,video plankton recorder, andcontinuous plankton recorder
Strategies for sampling plankton by size classes and abundance
The blue background indicates the filtered volume required to obtain sufficient organism numbers for analysis.
Actual volumes from which organisms are sampled are always recorded.[277]

Identifying microorganisms

[edit]
High volumes of plankton samples can be analysed rapidly
using modern imaging techniques.[277]
High volumes of plankton samples can also be analysed rapidly withsequencing techniques.[277]
Further information:microscopy,flow cytometry,Sanger sequencing,DNA barcoding,high throughput biology,microbial DNA barcoding,algae DNA barcoding, andBacterioplankton counting methods

Traditionally, thephylogeny of microorganisms was inferred and theirtaxonomy was established based on studies ofmorphology. However, developments inmolecular phylogenetics have allowed evolutionary relationship of species to be established by analyzing deeper characteristics, such as theirDNA andprotein sequences, for exampleribosomal DNA.[278] The lack of easily accessible morphological features, such as those present inanimals andplants, particularly hampered early efforts at classifying bacteria and archaea. This resulted in erroneous, distorted and confused classification, an example of which, notedCarl Woese, isPseudomonas whose etymology ironically matched its taxonomy, namely "false unit".[279] Many bacterial taxa have been reclassified or redefined using molecular phylogenetics.

Barcoding
Pelagibacter ubique, the most common bacterium in the ocean
Marinomonas arctica, a bacterium which grows inside Arctic sea ice at subzero temperatures
It would be difficult to consistently separate out these two microbes using images alone. However, if their barcodes are aligned to each other and their bases are coloured to see them more clearly, it becomes easy to see which bases are different between these two microbes. In this manner, millions of different kinds of microbes can be distinguished.[280]
DNA barcode alignment and comparison between the two species of marine bacteria pictured above[280]
Methods used to study phytoplankton
Three different possibilities to process the sample are using raw samples, fixation or preservation, and filtration. For microscopy and flow cytometry raw samples either are measured immediately or have to be fixed for later measurements. Since molecular methods, pigment analysis and detection of molecular tracers usually require concentrated cells, filter residues serve for phytoplankton measurements. Molecular characterization and quantification of trace molecules is performed usingchromatography,mass spectrometry, andnuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.[281]
External videos
video iconMicrobes don't actually look like anythingMeet the Microcosmos
video iconHow to Identify MicrobesMeet the Microcosmos
video iconDifferential interference contrast (DIC)Meet the Microcosmos
Methods of identifying microorganisms[282]
Chromogenic
media
Microscopy
techniques
Biochemical
techniques
Molecular
techniques
Traditional media
Bright field
Dark field
SEM
TEM
CLSM
ATM
Inverted microscopy
Spectrometry
    –FTIR
    –Raman spectrometry
Mass spectrometry
    –GC
    –LC
    –MALDI-TOF
    –ESI
Electrokinetic separation
Microfluidic chip
Propriety methods
    – Wickerham card
    –API
    – BBL Crystal
    – Vitek
    – Biolog
PCR
Real-time qPCR
Rapid PCR
PCR sequencing
RFLP
PFGE
Ribotyping
WGS
MALDI-TOF MS

Recent developments inmolecular sequencing have allowed for the recovery ofgenomesin situ, directly from environmental samples and avoiding the need for culturing. This has led for example, to a rapid expansion in knowledge of the diversity ofbacterial phyla. These techniques are genome-resolvedmetagenomics andsingle-cell genomics.

The new sequencing technologies and the accumulation of sequence data have resulted in a paradigm shift, highlighted both the ubiquity of microbial communities in association within higher organisms and the critical roles of microbes in ecosystem health.[283] These new possibilities have revolutionizedmicrobial ecology, because the analysis of genomes and metagenomes in a high-throughput manner provides efficient methods for addressing the functional potential of individual microorganisms as well as of whole communities in their natural habitats.[284][285][286]

Using omics data

[edit]
DNA sequencing technologies used in marine metagenomics
The discovery process involves marine sampling,DNA sequencing andcontig generation. Previously unknown genes, pathways and even whole genomes are being discovered. These genome-editing technologies are used to retrieve and modify valuable microorganisms for production, particularly in marine metagenomics. Organisms may be cultivable or uncultivable.Metagenomics is providing especially valuable information for uncultivable samples.[287]
Further information:Omics,environmental DNA,metabarcoding,metagenomics, andmetatranscriptomics

Omics is a term used informally to refer to branches ofbiology whose names end in the suffix-omics, such asgenomics,proteomics,metabolomics, andglycomics.Marine Omics has recently emerged as a field of research of its own.[288] Omics aims at collectively characterising and quantifying pools of biological molecules that translate into the structure, function, and dynamics of an organism or organisms. For example,functional genomics aims at identifying the functions of as many genes as possible of a given organism. It combines different-omics techniques such as transcriptomics and proteomics with saturatedmutant collections.[289][290]

Many omes beyond the originalgenome have become useful and have been widely adopted in recent years by research scientists. The suffix-omics can provide an easy shorthand to encapsulate a field; for example, aninteractomics study is reasonably recognisable as relating to large-scale analyses of gene-gene, protein-protein, or protein-ligand interactions, whileproteomics has become established as a term for studyingproteins on a large scale.

Any given omics technique, used just by itself, cannot adequately disentangle the intricacies of a hostmicrobiome. Multi-omics approaches are needed to satisfactorily unravel the complexities of the host-microbiome interactions.[291] For instance,metagenomics,metatranscriptomics,metaproteomics andmetabolomics methods are all used to provide information on themetagenome.[292]

Meta-omics data based biogeochemical modeling[293]
A schematic conceptual framework formarine biogeochemical modeling from environmental, imaging, and meta-omics data.[294] A semi-automatic computational pipeline is schematized for combining biomarkers with biogeochemical data[295] that can be incorporated into classic biogeochemical models[296] for creating a next generation of biogeochemical trait-based meta-omics models by considering their respective traits. Such novel meta-omics-enabled approaches aim to improve the monitoring and prediction of ocean processes while respecting the complexity of the planktonic system.[297][298]
Using omics data with marine phytoplankton[299]
As an example of how omics data can be used with marine phytoplankton to informEarth system science,metatranscriptome sequences from natural phytoplankton communities were used to help identify physiological traits (cellular concentration ofribosomes and theirrRNAs) underpinning adaptation to environmental conditions (temperature). A mechanistic phytoplankton cell model was used to test the significance of the identified physiological trait for cellularstoichiometry. Environmental selection in a trait‐based global marine ecosystem model was then linking emergent growth and cellular allocation strategies to large‐scale patterns in light, nutrients and temperature in the surface marine environment. Global predictions of cellular resource allocation and stoichiometry (N:P ratio) were consistent with patterns in metatranscriptome data[300] and latitudinal patterns in the elemental ratios of marine plankton and organic matter.[301] The three‐dimensional view of ribosome shows rRNA in dark blue and dark red. Lighter colours representribosomal proteins. Bands above show temperature‐dependent abundance of theeukaryotic ribosomal protein S14.[300]

See...

Anthropogenic impacts

[edit]
See also:Human impact on marine life
Microorganisms and climate change in marine and terrestrial biomes[6]

In marine environments, microbialprimary production contributes substantially toCO2 sequestration. Marine microorganisms also recycle nutrients for use in themarine food web and in the process release CO2 to the atmosphere. Microbial biomass and other organic matter (remnants of plants and animals) are converted to fossil fuels over millions of years. By contrast, burning offossil fuels liberates greenhouse gases in a small fraction of that time. As a result, thecarbon cycle is out of balance, and atmospheric CO2 levels will continue to rise as long as fossil fuels continue to be burnt.[6]

Scientists' warning to humanity [6]

Microorganisms have key roles in carbon and nutrient cycling, animal (including human) and plant health, agriculture and the global food web. Microorganisms live in all environments on Earth that are occupied by macroscopic organisms, and they are the sole life forms in other environments, such as the deep subsurface and ‘extreme’ environments. Microorganisms date back to the origin of life on Earth at least 3.8 billion years ago, and they will likely exist well beyond any future extinction events... Unless we appreciate the importance of microbial processes, we fundamentally limit our understanding of Earth's biosphere and response to climate change and thus jeopardize efforts to create an environmentally sustainable future.[6]

History

[edit]

Marine microorganisms known as cyanobacteria first emerged in the oceans during thePrecambrian era roughly 2 billion years ago. Over eons, the photosynthesis of marine microorganisms generated by oxygen has helped shape the chemical environment in the evolution of plants, animals and many other life forms. Marine microorganisms were first observed in 1675 by Dutch lensmakerAntonie van Leeuwenhoek.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abMadigan M; Martinko J, eds. (2006).Brock Biology of Microorganisms (13th ed.).Pearson Education. p. 1096.ISBN 978-0-321-73551-5.
  2. ^abRybicki EP (1990). "The classification of organisms at the edge of life, or problems with virus systematics".South African Journal of Science.86:182–6.ISSN 0038-2353.
  3. ^abLwoff A (1956)."The concept of virus".Journal of General Microbiology.17 (2):239–53.doi:10.1099/00221287-17-2-239.PMID 13481308.
  4. ^abcBar-On, YM; Phillips, R; Milo, R (2018)."The biomass distribution on Earth".PNAS.115 (25):6506–6511.Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.6506B.doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115.PMC 6016768.PMID 29784790.
  5. ^Census Of Marine Life Accessed 29 October 2020.
  6. ^abcdeCavicchioli, Ricardo; Ripple, William J.; Timmis, Kenneth N.; Azam, Farooq; et al. (2019)."Scientists' warning to humanity: Microorganisms and climate change".Nature Reviews Microbiology.17 (9):569–586.doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5.PMC 7136171.PMID 31213707. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  7. ^Bolhuis, H. and Cretoiu, M.S. (2016) "What is so special about marine microorganisms?". In: L. J. Stal and M. S. Cretoiu (Eds.)The Marine Microbiome, pages 3–20, Springer.ISBN 9783319330006
  8. ^ab"Functions of global ocean microbiome key to understanding environmental changes".www.sciencedaily.com. University of Georgia. 10 December 2015. Retrieved11 December 2015.
  9. ^ab2002 WHO mortality data Accessed 20 January 2007
  10. ^Wade, Nicholas (25 July 2016)."Meet Luca, the Ancestor of All Living Things".New York Times. Retrieved25 July 2016.
  11. ^Suttle CA (2005). "Viruses in the Sea".Nature.437 (9):356–361.Bibcode:2005Natur.437..356S.doi:10.1038/nature04160.PMID 16163346.S2CID 4370363.
  12. ^abGlöckner, F.O., Gasol, J.M., McDonough, N., Calewaert, J.B. et al. (2012)Marine microbial diversity and its role in ecosystem functioning and environmental change.European Science Foundation, Position Paper 17.ISBN 978-2-918428-71-8
  13. ^Suttle, C.A. (2005). "Viruses in the Sea".Nature.437 (9):356–361.Bibcode:2005Natur.437..356S.doi:10.1038/nature04160.PMID 16163346.S2CID 4370363.
  14. ^Shors p. 5.[full citation needed]
  15. ^Shors p. 593.[full citation needed]
  16. ^abcSuttle CA (2007). "Marine viruses—major players in the global ecosystem".Nature Reviews Microbiology.5 (10):801–12.doi:10.1038/nrmicro1750.PMID 17853907.S2CID 4658457.
  17. ^Living Bacteria Are Riding Earth's Air CurrentsSmithsonian Magazine, 11 January 2016.
  18. ^Robbins, Jim (13 April 2018)."Trillions Upon Trillions of Viruses Fall From the Sky Each Day".The New York Times. Retrieved14 April 2018.
  19. ^Reche, Isabel; D'Orta, Gaetano; Mladenov, Natalie; Winget, Danielle M; Suttle, Curtis A (29 January 2018)."Deposition rates of viruses and bacteria above the atmospheric boundary layer".ISME Journal.12 (4):1154–1162.Bibcode:2018ISMEJ..12.1154R.doi:10.1038/s41396-017-0042-4.PMC 5864199.PMID 29379178.
  20. ^Staff (2014)."The Biosphere".Aspen Global Change Institute. Archived fromthe original on 2 September 2010. Retrieved10 November 2014.
  21. ^abcChoi, Charles Q. (17 March 2013)."Microbes Thrive in Deepest Spot on Earth".LiveScience. Retrieved17 March 2013.
  22. ^Glud, Ronnie; Wenzhöfer, Frank; Middelboe, Mathias; Oguri, Kazumasa; Turnewitsch, Robert; Canfield, Donald E.; Kitazato, Hiroshi (17 March 2013). "High rates of microbial carbon turnover in sediments in the deepest oceanic trench on Earth".Nature Geoscience.6 (4):284–288.Bibcode:2013NatGe...6..284G.doi:10.1038/ngeo1773.
  23. ^Oskin, Becky (14 March 2013)."Intraterrestrials: Life Thrives in Ocean Floor".LiveScience. Retrieved17 March 2013.
  24. ^Morelle, Rebecca (15 December 2014)."Microbes discovered by deepest marine drill analysed".BBC News. Retrieved15 December 2014.
  25. ^Takai K, Nakamura K, Toki T, Tsunogai U, et al. (2008)."Cell proliferation at 122°C and isotopically heavy CH4 production by a hyperthermophilic methanogen under high-pressure cultivation".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.105 (31):10949–54.Bibcode:2008PNAS..10510949T.doi:10.1073/pnas.0712334105.PMC 2490668.PMID 18664583.
  26. ^Fox, Douglas (20 August 2014)."Lakes under the ice: Antarctica's secret garden".Nature.512 (7514):244–246.Bibcode:2014Natur.512..244F.doi:10.1038/512244a.PMID 25143097.
  27. ^Mack, Eric (20 August 2014)."Life Confirmed Under Antarctic Ice; Is Space Next?".Forbes. Retrieved21 August 2014.
  28. ^Armbrust, E.V.; Palumbi, S.R. (2015). "Uncovering hidden worlds of ocean biodiversity".Science.348 (6237):865–867.Bibcode:2015Sci...348..865A.doi:10.1126/science.aaa7378.PMID 25999494.S2CID 36480105.
  29. ^Azam, F.; Malfatti, F. (2007). "Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems".Nature Reviews Microbiology.5 (10):782–791.doi:10.1038/nrmicro1747.PMID 17853906.S2CID 10055219.
  30. ^Middelboe M, Brussaard C (2017)."Marine viruses: key players in marine ecosystems".Viruses.9 (10): 302.doi:10.3390/v9100302.PMC 5691653.PMID 29057790.
  31. ^Koonin EV, Senkevich TG, Dolja VV (2006)."The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells".Biology Direct.1: 29.doi:10.1186/1745-6150-1-29.PMC 1594570.PMID 16984643.
  32. ^abCanchaya C, Fournous G, Chibani-Chennoufi S, Dillmann ML, Brüssow H (2003). "Phage as agents of lateral gene transfer".Current Opinion in Microbiology.6 (4):417–24.doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00086-9.PMID 12941415.
  33. ^abRybicki EP (1990). "The classification of organisms at the edge of life, or problems with virus systematics".South African Journal of Science.86:182–186.
  34. ^abcKoonin EV, Starokadomskyy P (October 2016)."Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an old but misguided question".Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.59:125–134.doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.016.PMC 5406846.PMID 26965225.
  35. ^Iyer LM, Balaji S, Koonin EV, Aravind L (2006)."Evolutionary genomics of nucleo-cytoplasmic large DNA viruses".Virus Research.117 (1):156–84.doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.009.PMID 16494962.
  36. ^Sanjuán R, Nebot MR, Chirico N, Mansky LM, Belshaw R (October 2010)."Viral mutation rates".Journal of Virology.84 (19):9733–48.doi:10.1128/JVI.00694-10.PMC 2937809.PMID 20660197.
  37. ^Mahy, W.J.; Van Regenmortel, M.H.V., eds. (2009).Desk Encyclopedia of General Virology. Oxford: Academic Press. p. 28.ISBN 978-0-12-375146-1.
  38. ^abMann NH (17 May 2005)."The Third Age of Phage".PLOS Biology.3 (5):753–755.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030182.PMC 1110918.PMID 15884981.
  39. ^Wommack KE, Colwell RR (2000)."Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems".Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.64 (1):69–114.doi:10.1128/MMBR.64.1.69-114.2000.PMC 98987.PMID 10704475.
  40. ^abSuttle CA (2005). "Viruses in the sea".Nature.437 (7057):356–361.Bibcode:2005Natur.437..356S.doi:10.1038/nature04160.PMID 16163346.S2CID 4370363.
  41. ^Bergh O, Børsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M (1989). "High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments".Nature.340 (6233):467–8.Bibcode:1989Natur.340..467B.doi:10.1038/340467a0.PMID 2755508.S2CID 4271861.
  42. ^Wigington CH, Sonderegger D, Brussaard CP, Buchan A, Finke JF, Fuhrman JA, Lennon JT, Middelboe M, Suttle CA, Stock C, Wilson WH, Wommack KE, Wilhelm SW, Weitz JS (2016)."Re-examination of the relationship between marine virus and microbial cell abundances"(PDF).Nature Microbiology.1 (3): 15024.doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.24.PMID 27572161.S2CID 52829633.
  43. ^Brum JR, Schenck RO, Sullivan MB (September 2013)."Global morphological analysis of marine viruses shows minimal regional variation and dominance of non-tailed viruses".The ISME Journal.7 (9):1738–51.Bibcode:2013ISMEJ...7.1738B.doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.67.PMC 3749506.PMID 23635867.
  44. ^Krupovic M, Bamford DH (2007)."Putative prophages related to lytic tailless marine dsDNA phage PM2 are widespread in the genomes of aquatic bacteria".BMC Genomics.8: 236.doi:10.1186/1471-2164-8-236.PMC 1950889.PMID 17634101.
  45. ^Xue H, Xu Y, Boucher Y, Polz MF (2012)."High frequency of a novel filamentous phage, VCY φ, within an environmental Vibrio cholerae population".Applied and Environmental Microbiology.78 (1):28–33.Bibcode:2012ApEnM..78...28X.doi:10.1128/AEM.06297-11.PMC 3255608.PMID 22020507.
  46. ^Roux S, Krupovic M, Poulet A, Debroas D, Enault F (2012)."Evolution and diversity of the Microviridae viral family through a collection of 81 new complete genomes assembled from virome reads".PLOS ONE.7 (7): e40418.Bibcode:2012PLoSO...740418R.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040418.PMC 3394797.PMID 22808158.
  47. ^Kauffman KM, Hussain FA, Yang J, Arevalo P, Brown JM, Chang WK, VanInsberghe D, Elsherbini J, Sharma RS, Cutler MB, Kelly L, Polz MF (2018). "A major lineage of non-tailed dsDNA viruses as unrecognized killers of marine bacteria".Nature.554 (7690):118–122.Bibcode:2018Natur.554..118K.doi:10.1038/nature25474.PMID 29364876.S2CID 4462007.
  48. ^"Scientists Find New Type of Virus in World's Oceans: Autolykiviridae".Sci News. 25 January 2018.
  49. ^Dockrill, Peter (25 January 2018)."Never-Before-Seen Viruses With Weird DNA Were Just Discovered in The Ocean".Sciencealert.
  50. ^Schoch CL, et al. (2020)."Autolykiviridae".NCBI Taxonomy: A Comprehensive Update on Curation, Resources and Tools (Database (Oxford)).2020. baaa062.doi:10.1093/database/baaa062.PMC 7408187.PMID 32761142.
  51. ^Lawrence CM, Menon S, Eilers BJ (2009)."Structural and functional studies of archaeal viruses".Journal of Biological Chemistry.284 (19):12599–603.doi:10.1074/jbc.R800078200.PMC 2675988.PMID 19158076.
  52. ^Prangishvili D, Forterre P, Garrett RA (2006). "Viruses of the Archaea: a unifying view".Nature Reviews Microbiology.4 (11):837–48.doi:10.1038/nrmicro1527.PMID 17041631.S2CID 9915859.
  53. ^Prangishvili D, Garrett RA (2004)."Exceptionally diverse morphotypes and genomes of crenarchaeal hyperthermophilic viruses"(PDF).Biochemical Society Transactions.32 (Pt 2):204–8.doi:10.1042/BST0320204.PMID 15046572.S2CID 20018642.
  54. ^"Harmful Algal Blooms: Red Tide: Home | CDC HSB". www.cdc.gov. Retrieved19 December 2014.
  55. ^Forterre P, Philippe H (1999). "The last universal common ancestor (LUCA), simple or complex?".The Biological Bulletin.196 (3):373–5, discussion 375–7.doi:10.2307/1542973.JSTOR 1542973.PMID 11536914.
  56. ^Abrahão, Jônatas; Silva, Lorena; Silva, Ludmila Santos; Khalil, Jacques Yaacoub Bou; et al. (27 February 2018)."Tailed giant Tupanvirus possesses the most complete translational apparatus of the known virosphere".Nature Communications.9 (1): 749.Bibcode:2018NatCo...9..749A.doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03168-1.PMC 5829246.PMID 29487281.
  57. ^Reardon, Sara (6 April 2017). "Patchwork giant viruses spark debate over the tree of life".Nature.doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21798.ISSN 1476-4687.S2CID 89815981.
  58. ^Bichell, Rae Ellen."In Giant Virus Genes, Hints About Their Mysterious Origin".All Things Considered.
  59. ^Van Etten JL (July–August 2011)."Giant Viruses".American Scientist.99 (4):304–311.doi:10.1511/2011.91.304.
  60. ^Legendre M, Arslan D, Abergel C, Claverie JM (January 2012)."Genomics of Megavirus and the elusive fourth domain of Life".Communicative & Integrative Biology.5 (1):102–6.doi:10.4161/cib.18624.PMC 3291303.PMID 22482024.
  61. ^Schulz F, Yutin N, Ivanova NN, Ortega DR, Lee TK, Vierheilig J, Daims H, Horn M, Wagner M, Jensen GJ, Kyrpides NC, Koonin EV, Woyke T (April 2017)."Giant viruses with an expanded complement of translation system components"(PDF).Science.356 (6333):82–85.Bibcode:2017Sci...356...82S.doi:10.1126/science.aal4657.PMID 28386012.S2CID 206655792.
  62. ^Bäckström D, Yutin N, Jørgensen SL, Dharamshi J, Homa F, Zaremba-Niedwiedzka K, Spang A, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Ettema TJ (March 2019)."Virus Genomes from Deep Sea Sediments Expand the Ocean Megavirome and Support Independent Origins of Viral Gigantism".mBio.10 (2): e02497-02418.doi:10.1128/mBio.02497-18.PMC 6401483.PMID 30837339.
  63. ^Fredrickson JK, Zachara JM, Balkwill DL, Kennedy D, Li SM, Kostandarithes HM, Daly MJ, Romine MF, Brockman FJ (2004)."Geomicrobiology of high-level nuclear waste-contaminated vadose sediments at the Hanford site, Washington state".Applied and Environmental Microbiology.70 (7):4230–41.Bibcode:2004ApEnM..70.4230F.doi:10.1128/AEM.70.7.4230-4241.2004.PMC 444790.PMID 15240306.
  64. ^Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML (1990)."Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.87 (12):4576–9.Bibcode:1990PNAS...87.4576W.doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576.PMC 54159.PMID 2112744.
  65. ^Schopf JW (1994)."Disparate rates, differing fates: tempo and mode of evolution changed from the Precambrian to the Phanerozoic".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.91 (15):6735–42.Bibcode:1994PNAS...91.6735S.doi:10.1073/pnas.91.15.6735.PMC 44277.PMID 8041691.
  66. ^DeLong EF, Pace NR (2001). "Environmental diversity of bacteria and archaea".Systematic Biology.50 (4):470–8.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.321.8828.doi:10.1080/106351501750435040.PMID 12116647.
  67. ^Brown JR, Doolittle WF (1997)."Archaea and the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition".Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.61 (4):456–502.doi:10.1128/mmbr.61.4.456-502.1997.PMC 232621.PMID 9409149.
  68. ^Dyall, Sabrina D.; Brown, Mark T.;Johnson, Patricia J. (9 April 2004). "Ancient Invasions: From Endosymbionts to Organelles".Science.304 (5668):253–257.Bibcode:2004Sci...304..253D.doi:10.1126/science.1094884.ISSN 0036-8075.PMID 15073369.S2CID 19424594.
  69. ^Poole AM, Penny D (2007). "Evaluating hypotheses for the origin of eukaryotes".BioEssays.29 (1):74–84.doi:10.1002/bies.20516.PMID 17187354.S2CID 36026766.
  70. ^Lang BF, Gray MW, Burger G (1999). "Mitochondrial genome evolution and the origin of eukaryotes".Annual Review of Genetics.33:351–97.doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.351.PMID 10690412.
  71. ^McFadden GI (1999). "Endosymbiosis and evolution of the plant cell".Current Opinion in Plant Biology.2 (6):513–9.Bibcode:1999COPB....2..513M.doi:10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00025-4.PMID 10607659.
  72. ^Patrick J. Keeling (2004). "Diversity and evolutionary history of plastids and their hosts".American Journal of Botany.91 (10):1481–1493.doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1481.PMID 21652304.S2CID 17522125.
  73. ^"Candidatus Pelagibacter Ubique".Bacteria Genomes. European Bioinformatics Institute. 2011. Archived fromthe original on 1 December 2008. Retrieved8 January 2012.
  74. ^"Flea market: A newly discovered virus may be the most abundant organism on the planet".The Economist. 16 February 2013. Retrieved16 February 2013.
  75. ^Zhao Y, Temperton B, Thrash JC, Schwalbach MS, Vergin KL, Landry ZC, Ellisman M, Deerinck T, Sullivan MB, Giovannoni SJ (2013). "Abundant SAR11 viruses in the ocean".Nature.494 (7437):357–360.Bibcode:2013Natur.494..357Z.doi:10.1038/nature11921.PMID 23407494.S2CID 4348619.
  76. ^"The largest Bacterium: Scientist discovers new bacterial life form off the African coast",Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 8 April 1999, archived fromthe original on 20 January 2010
  77. ^List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature – Genus Thiomargarita
  78. ^Bang C, Schmitz RA (2015)."Archaea associated with human surfaces: not to be underestimated".FEMS Microbiology Reviews.39 (5):631–48.doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv010.PMID 25907112.
  79. ^ArchaeaOnline Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 17 August 2016.
  80. ^Pace NR (May 2006)."Time for a change".Nature.441 (7091): 289.Bibcode:2006Natur.441..289P.doi:10.1038/441289a.PMID 16710401.S2CID 4431143.
  81. ^Stoeckenius W (1 October 1981)."Walsby's square bacterium: fine structure of an orthogonal procaryote".Journal of Bacteriology.148 (1):352–60.doi:10.1128/JB.148.1.352-360.1981.PMC 216199.PMID 7287626.
  82. ^Madigan M, Martinko J, eds. (2005).Brock Biology of Microorganisms (11th ed.). Prentice Hall.ISBN 978-0-13-144329-7.
  83. ^"Deep sea microorganisms and the origin of the eukaryotic cell"(PDF). Retrieved24 October 2017.
  84. ^Yamaguchi, Masashi; et al. (1 December 2012). "Prokaryote or eukaryote? A unique microorganism from the deep sea".Journal of Electron Microscopy.61 (6):423–431.doi:10.1093/jmicro/dfs062.PMID 23024290.
  85. ^Whittaker, R.H.; Margulis, L. (1978). "Protist classification and the kingdoms of organisms".Biosystems.10 (1–2):3–18.Bibcode:1978BiSys..10....3W.doi:10.1016/0303-2647(78)90023-0.PMID 418827.
  86. ^Faure E, Not F, Benoiston AS, Labadie K, Bittner L, Ayata SD (2019)."Mixotrophic protists display contrasted biogeographies in the global ocean".ISME Journal.13 (4):1072–1083.Bibcode:2019ISMEJ..13.1072F.doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0340-5.PMC 6461780.PMID 30643201.
  87. ^abcLeles SG, Mitra A, Flynn KJ, Stoecker DK, Hansen PJ, Calbet A, McManus GB, Sanders RW, Caron DA, Not F, Hallegraeff GM (2017)."Oceanic protists with different forms of acquired phototrophy display contrasting biogeographies and abundance".Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.284 (1860): 20170664.doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0664.PMC 5563798.PMID 28768886.
  88. ^Budd, Graham E; Jensen, Sören (2017)."The origin of the animals and a 'Savannah' hypothesis for early bilaterian evolution".Biological Reviews.92 (1):446–473.doi:10.1111/brv.12239.PMID 26588818.
  89. ^Cavalier-Smith T (December 1993)."Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla".Microbiological Reviews.57 (4):953–94.doi:10.1128/mmbr.57.4.953-994.1993.PMC 372943.PMID 8302218.
  90. ^Corliss JO (1992). "Should there be a separate code of nomenclature for the protists?".BioSystems.28 (1–3):1–14.Bibcode:1992BiSys..28....1C.doi:10.1016/0303-2647(92)90003-H.PMID 1292654.
  91. ^Slapeta J, Moreira D, López-García P (2005)."The extent of protist diversity: insights from molecular ecology of freshwater eukaryotes".Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.272 (1576):2073–81.doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3195.PMC 1559898.PMID 16191619.
  92. ^Moreira D, López-García P (2002)."The molecular ecology of microbial eukaryotes unveils a hidden world"(PDF).Trends in Microbiology.10 (1):31–8.doi:10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02257-0.PMID 11755083.
  93. ^abAndrew Alverson (14 October 2022)."The Air You're Breathing? A Diatom Made That".LiveScience.
  94. ^"More on Diatoms".University of California Museum of Paleontology. Archived fromthe original on 4 October 2012. Retrieved11 October 2019.
  95. ^Devreotes P (1989). "Dictyostelium discoideum: a model system for cell-cell interactions in development".Science.245 (4922):1054–8.Bibcode:1989Sci...245.1054D.doi:10.1126/science.2672337.PMID 2672337.
  96. ^Mikhail V. Matz; Tamara M. Frank; N. Justin Marshall; Edith A. Widder; Sonke Johnsen (9 December 2008)."Giant Deep-Sea Protist Produces Bilaterian-like Traces"(PDF).Current Biology.18 (23). Elsevier Ltd:1849–1854.Bibcode:2008CBio...18.1849M.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.028.PMID 19026540.S2CID 8819675. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 16 December 2008.
  97. ^Gooday, A. J.; Aranda da Silva, A.; Pawlowski, J. (1 December 2011). "Xenophyophores (Rhizaria, Foraminifera) from the Nazaré Canyon (Portuguese margin, NE Atlantic)".Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. The Geology, Geochemistry, and Biology of Submarine Canyons West of Portugal.58 (23–24):2401–2419.Bibcode:2011DSRII..58.2401G.doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2011.04.005.
  98. ^Neil A C, Reece J B, Simon E J (2004)Essential biology with physiology Pearson/Benjamin Cummings, Page 291.ISBN 9780805375039
  99. ^O'Malley MA, Simpson AG, Roger AJ (2012). "The other eukaryotes in light of evolutionary protistology".Biology & Philosophy.28 (2):299–330.doi:10.1007/s10539-012-9354-y.S2CID 85406712.
  100. ^Adl SM, Simpson AG, Farmer MA, Andersen RA, Anderson OR, Barta JR, Bowser SS, Brugerolle G, Fensome RA, Fredericq S, James TY, Karpov S, Kugrens P, Krug J, Lane CE, Lewis LA, Lodge J, Lynn DH, Mann DG, McCourt RM, Mendoza L, Moestrup O, Mozley-Standridge SE, Nerad TA, Shearer CA, Smirnov AV, Spiegel FW, Taylor MF (2005)."The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists"(PDF).The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.52 (5):399–451.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x.PMID 16248873.S2CID 8060916.
  101. ^Margulis L, Chapman MJ (19 March 2009).Kingdoms and Domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth. Academic Press.ISBN 9780080920146.
  102. ^abDawson, Scott C; Paredez, Alexander R (2013)."Alternative cytoskeletal landscapes: cytoskeletal novelty and evolution in basal excavate protists".Current Opinion in Cell Biology.25 (1):134–141.doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2012.11.005.PMC 4927265.PMID 23312067.
  103. ^abAtkinson, A.; Polimene, L.; Fileman, E.S.; Widdicombe, C.E.; McEvoy, A.J.; Smyth, T.J.; Djeghri, N.; Sailley, S.F.; Cornwell, L.E. (2018).""Comment. What drives plankton seasonality in a stratifying shelf sea? Some competing and complementary theories""(PDF).Limnology and Oceanography.63 (6):2877–2884.Bibcode:2018LimOc..63.2877A.doi:10.1002/lno.11036.S2CID 91380765.
  104. ^Singleton, Paul (2006).Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, 3rd Edition, revised. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. p. 32.ISBN 978-0-470-03545-0.
  105. ^David J. Patterson."Amoebae: Protists Which Move and Feed Using Pseudopodia". Tree of Life web project.
  106. ^"The Amoebae". The University of Edinburgh. Archived fromthe original on 10 June 2009.
  107. ^Brady, Richard M. (1993)."Torque and switching in the bacterial flagellar motor. An electrostatic model".Biophysical Journal.64 (4):961–973.Bibcode:1993BpJ....64..961B.doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81462-0.PMC 1262414.PMID 7684268.
  108. ^Lauga, Eric; Thomas R Powers (25 August 2009). "The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms".Reports on Progress in Physics.72 (9): 096601.arXiv:0812.2887.Bibcode:2009RPPh...72i6601L.doi:10.1088/0034-4885/72/9/096601.S2CID 3932471.
  109. ^Hyde, K.D.; E.B.J. Jones; E. Leaño; S.B. Pointing; A.D. Poonyth; L.L.P. Vrijmoed (1998). "Role of fungi in marine ecosystems".Biodiversity and Conservation.7 (9):1147–1161.Bibcode:1998BiCon...7.1147H.doi:10.1023/A:1008823515157.S2CID 22264931.
  110. ^Kirk, P.M., Cannon, P.F., Minter, D.W. and Stalpers, J. "Dictionary of the Fungi". Edn 10. CABI, 2008
  111. ^Hyde, K.D.; E.B.J. Jones (1989). "Spore attachment in marine fungi".Botanica Marina.32 (3):205–218.doi:10.1515/botm.1989.32.3.205.S2CID 84879817.
  112. ^Le Calvez T, Burgaud G, Mahé S, Barbier G, Vandenkoornhuyse P (October 2009)."Fungal diversity in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems".Applied and Environmental Microbiology.75 (20):6415–21.Bibcode:2009ApEnM..75.6415L.doi:10.1128/AEM.00653-09.PMC 2765129.PMID 19633124.
  113. ^San-Martín, A.; S. Orejanera; C. Gallardo; M. Silva; J. Becerra; R. Reinoso; M.C. Chamy; K. Vergara; J. Rovirosa (2008)."Steroids from the marine fungus Geotrichum sp".Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society.53 (1):1377–1378.doi:10.4067/S0717-97072008000100011.
  114. ^Jones, E.B.G., Hyde, K.D., & Pang, K.-L., eds. (2014).Freshwater fungi: and fungal-like organisms. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
  115. ^Jones, E.B.G.; Pang, K.-L., eds. (2012).Marine Fungi, and Fungal-like Organisms. Marine and Freshwater Botany. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter (published August 2012).doi:10.1515/9783110264067.ISBN 978-3-11-026406-7. Retrieved3 September 2015.
  116. ^Wang, Xin; Singh, Purnima; Gao, Zheng; Zhang, Xiaobo; Johnson, Zackary I.; Wang, Guangyi (2014)."Distribution and Diversity of Planktonic Fungi in the West Pacific Warm Pool".PLOS ONE.9 (7): e101523.Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j1523W.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101523.s001.PMC 4081592.PMID 24992154.
  117. ^Wang, G.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Li, Q. (2012)."Diversity and biogeochemical function of planktonic fungi in the ocean". In Raghukumar, C. (ed.).Biology of marine fungi. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 71–88.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23342-5.ISBN 978-3-642-23341-8.S2CID 39378040. Retrieved3 September 2015.
  118. ^Damare, Samir; Raghukumar, Chandralata (11 November 2007). "Fungi and Macroaggregation in Deep-Sea Sediments".Microbial Ecology.56 (1):168–177.doi:10.1007/s00248-007-9334-y.ISSN 0095-3628.PMID 17994287.S2CID 21288251.
  119. ^Kubanek, Julia; Jensen, Paul R.; Keifer, Paul A.; Sullards, M. Cameron; Collins, Dwight O.; Fenical, William (10 June 2003)."Seaweed resistance to microbial attack: A targeted chemical defense against marine fungi".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.100 (12):6916–6921.Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.6916K.doi:10.1073/pnas.1131855100.ISSN 0027-8424.PMC 165804.PMID 12756301.
  120. ^abGao, Zheng; Johnson, Zackary I.; Wang, Guangyi (30 July 2009)."Molecular characterization of the spatial diversity and novel lineages of mycoplankton in Hawaiian coastal waters".The ISME Journal.4 (1):111–120.doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.87.ISSN 1751-7362.PMID 19641535.
  121. ^Panzer, Katrin; Yilmaz, Pelin; Weiß, Michael; Reich, Lothar; Richter, Michael; Wiese, Jutta; Schmaljohann, Rolf; Labes, Antje; Imhoff, Johannes F. (30 July 2015)."Identification of Habitat-Specific Biomes of Aquatic Fungal Communities Using a Comprehensive Nearly Full-Length 18S rRNA Dataset Enriched with Contextual Data".PLOS ONE.10 (7): e0134377.Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1034377P.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134377.PMC 4520555.PMID 26226014.
  122. ^Gutierrez, Marcelo H; Pantoja, Silvio; Quinones, Renato a and Gonzalez, Rodrigo R. First record of flamentous fungi in the coastal upwelling ecosystem off central Chile.Gayana (Concepc.) [online]. 2010, vol.74, n.1, pp. 66-73.ISSN 0717-6538.
  123. ^abSridhar, K.R. (2009). "10. Aquatic fungi – Are they planktonic?".Plankton Dynamics of Indian Waters. Jaipur, India: Pratiksha Publications. pp. 133–148.
  124. ^"Species of Higher Marine Fungi".Marine Fungi. University of Southern Mississippi. Archived fromthe original on 22 April 2013. Retrieved5 February 2012.
  125. ^Hawksworth, D.L. (2000)."Freshwater and marine lichen-forming fungi"(PDF).Fungal Diversity.5:1–7. Retrieved6 February 2012.
  126. ^"Lichens". National Park Service, US Department of the Interior, Government of the United States. 22 May 2016. Retrieved4 April 2018.
  127. ^ab"The Earth Life Web, Growth and Development in Lichens". earthlife.net. 14 February 2020.
  128. ^Silliman BR, Newell SY (2003)."Fungal farming in a snail".PNAS.100 (26):15643–15648.Bibcode:2003PNAS..10015643S.doi:10.1073/pnas.2535227100.PMC 307621.PMID 14657360.
  129. ^Yuan X, Xiao S (2005). "Lichen-Like Symbiosis 600 Million Years Ago".Science.308 (5724):1017–1020.Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1017Y.doi:10.1126/science.1111347.PMID 15890881.S2CID 27083645.
  130. ^Jones, E. B. Gareth; Pang, Ka-Lai (31 August 2012).Marine Fungi: and Fungal-like Organisms. Walter de Gruyter.ISBN 9783110264067.
  131. ^Janet Fang (6 April 2010). "Animals thrive without oxygen at sea bottom".Nature.464 (7290): 825.Bibcode:2010Natur.464..825F.doi:10.1038/464825b.PMID 20376121.S2CID 4340458.
  132. ^"Briny deep basin may be home to animals thriving without oxygen".Science News. 23 September 2013.
  133. ^abCampbell, Neil A.; Reece, Jane B.; Urry, Lisa Andrea; Cain, Michael L.; Wasserman, Steven Alexander; Minorsky, Peter V.; Jackson, Robert Bradley (2008).Biology (8th ed.). San Francisco: Pearson – Benjamin Cummings.ISBN 978-0-321-54325-7.
  134. ^McNeill, J.; et al., eds. (2012).International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code), Adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011 (electronic ed.). International Association for Plant Taxonomy. Retrieved14 May 2017.
  135. ^Changes in oxygen concentrations in our ocean can disrupt fundamental biological cyclesPhys.org, 25 November 2019.
  136. ^Walsh PJ, Smith S, Fleming L, Solo-Gabriele H, Gerwick WH, eds. (2 September 2011)."Cyanobacteria and cyanobacterial toxins".Oceans and Human Health: Risks and Remedies from the Seas. Academic Press. pp. 271–296.ISBN 978-0-08-087782-2.
  137. ^"The Rise of Oxygen".Astrobiology Magazine. 30 July 2003. Archived fromthe original on 3 April 2015. Retrieved6 April 2016.
  138. ^Flannery DT, Walter RM (2012). "Archean tufted microbial mats and the Great Oxidation Event: new insights into an ancient problem".Australian Journal of Earth Sciences.59 (1):1–11.Bibcode:2012AuJES..59....1F.doi:10.1080/08120099.2011.607849.S2CID 53618061.
  139. ^Rothschild, Lynn (September 2003)."Understand the evolutionary mechanisms and environmental limits of life". NASA. Archived fromthe original on 29 March 2012. Retrieved13 July 2009.
  140. ^Nadis S (December 2003)."The cells that rule the seas"(PDF).Scientific American.289 (6):52–53.Bibcode:2003SciAm.289f..52N.doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1203-52.PMID 14631732. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 19 April 2014. Retrieved2 June 2019.
  141. ^Joe Palca (12 June 2008)."The Most Important Microbe You've Never Heard Of".npr.org.
  142. ^Flombaum P, Gallegos JL, Gordillo RA, Rincon J, Zabala LL, Jiao N, Karl DM, Li WK, Lomas MW, Veneziano D, Vera CS, Vrugt JA, Martiny AC (2013)."Present and future global distributions of the marine CyanobacteriaProchlorococcus andSynechococcus".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.110 (24):9824–9829.Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.9824F.doi:10.1073/pnas.1307701110.PMC 3683724.PMID 23703908.
  143. ^Nabors, Murray W. (2004).Introduction to Botany. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education, Inc.ISBN 978-0-8053-4416-5.
  144. ^Allaby, M., ed. (1992). "Algae".The Concise Dictionary of Botany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  145. ^Guiry MD (October 2012). "How many species of algae are there?".Journal of Phycology.48 (5):1057–63.Bibcode:2012JPcgy..48.1057G.doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01222.x.PMID 27011267.S2CID 30911529.
  146. ^abGuiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. (2016)."Algaebase".www.algaebase.org. Retrieved20 November 2016.
  147. ^D. Thomas (2002).Seaweeds. Life Series.Natural History Museum, London.ISBN 978-0-565-09175-0.
  148. ^Van den Hoek, Christiaan; Mann, David; Jahns, H.M. (1995).Algae: an introduction to phycology. Cambridge University Press. p. 166.ISBN 9780521316873.OCLC 443576944.
  149. ^Starckx, Senne (31 October 2012)."A place in the sun".Flanders Today. Archived fromthe original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved8 December 2012.Algae is the crop of the future, according to researchers in Geel
  150. ^Mandoli DF (1998). "Elaboration of Body Plan and Phase Change during Development of Acetabularia: How Is the Complex Architecture of a Giant Unicell Built?".Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology.49:173–198.doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.173.PMID 15012232.S2CID 6241264.
  151. ^Pierre Madl; Maricela Yip (2004)."Literature Review of Caulerpa taxifolia".BUFUS-Info.19 (31). Archived fromthe original on 8 October 2022. Retrieved11 October 2019.
  152. ^Duval, B.; Margulis, L. (1995). "The microbial community ofOphrydium versatile colonies: endosymbionts, residents, and tenants".Symbiosis.18:181–210.PMID 11539474.
  153. ^Lalli, C.; Parsons, T. (1993).Biological Oceanography: An Introduction. Butterworth-Heinemann.ISBN 0-7506-3384-0.
  154. ^Eerie red glow traces ocean plant healthNASA Science, 28 May 2009.
  155. ^Behrenfeld, M.J.; Westberry, T.K.; Boss, E.S.; O'Malley, R.T.; Siegel, D.A.; Wiggert, J.D.; Franz, B.A.; McLain, C.R.; Feldman, G.C.; Doney, S.C.; Moore, J.K. (2009)."Satellite-detected fluorescence reveals global physiology of ocean phytoplankton".Biogeosciences.6 (5):779–794.Bibcode:2009BGeo....6..779B.doi:10.5194/bg-6-779-2009.hdl:1912/2854.
  156. ^abWassilieff, Maggy (2006)"Plankton – Plant plankton",Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Accessed: 2 November 2019.
  157. ^Lindsey, R., Scott, M. and Simmon, R. (2010)"What are phytoplankton".NASA Earth Observatory.
  158. ^Field, C. B.; Behrenfeld, M. J.; Randerson, J. T.; Falwoski, P. G. (1998)."Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components".Science.281 (5374):237–240.Bibcode:1998Sci...281..237F.doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237.PMID 9657713.
  159. ^Treguer, P.; Nelson, D. M.; Van Bennekom, A. J.; Demaster, D. J.; Leynaert, A.; Queguiner, B. (1995). "The Silica Balance in the World Ocean: A Reestimate".Science.268 (5209):375–9.Bibcode:1995Sci...268..375T.doi:10.1126/science.268.5209.375.PMID 17746543.S2CID 5672525.
  160. ^"King's College London – Lake Megachad".www.kcl.ac.uk. Retrieved5 May 2018.
  161. ^Arsenieff, L.; Simon, N.; Rigaut-Jalabert, F.; Le Gall, F.; Chaffron, S.; Corre, E.; Com, E.; Bigeard, E.; Baudoux, A.C. (2018)."First Viruses Infecting the Marine Diatom Guinardia delicatula".Frontiers in Microbiology.9: 3235.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.03235.PMC 6334475.PMID 30687251.
  162. ^Zhang, D.; Wang, Y.; Cai, J.; Pan, J.; Jiang, X.; Jiang, Y. (2012)."Bio-manufacturing technology based on diatom micro- and nanostructure".Chinese Science Bulletin.57 (30):3836–3849.Bibcode:2012ChSBu..57.3836Z.doi:10.1007/s11434-012-5410-x.
  163. ^Rost, B. and Riebesell, U. (2004) "Coccolithophores and the biological pump: responses to environmental changes". In:Coccolithophores: From Molecular Processes to Global Impact, pages 99–125, Springer.ISBN 9783662062784.
  164. ^Wassilieff, Maggy (2006)"A coccolithophore",Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Accessed: 2 November 2019.
  165. ^DeLong, E.F.; Beja, O. (2010)."The light-driven proton pump proteorhodopsin enhances bacterial survival during tough times".PLOS Biology.8 (4): e1000359.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000359.PMC 2860490.PMID 20436957. e1000359.
  166. ^abGómez-Consarnau, L.; Raven, J.A.; Levine, N.M.; Cutter, L.S.; Wang, D.; Seegers, B.; Arístegui, J.; Fuhrman, J.A.; Gasol, J.M.; Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S.A. (2019)."Microbial rhodopsins are major contributors to the solar energy captured in the sea".Science Advances.5 (8): eaaw8855.Bibcode:2019SciA....5.8855G.doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw8855.PMC 6685716.PMID 31457093.
  167. ^Oren, Aharon (2002)."Molecular ecology of extremely halophilic Archaea and Bacteria".FEMS Microbiology Ecology.39 (1):1–7.Bibcode:2002FEMME..39....1O.doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00900.x.ISSN 0168-6496.PMID 19709178.
  168. ^Béja, O.; Aravind, L.; Koonin, E.V.; Suzuki, M.T.; Hadd, A.; Nguyen, L.P.; Jovanovich, S.B.; Gates, C.M.; Feldman, R.A.; Spudich, J.L.; Spudich, E.N. (2000). "Bacterial rhodopsin: evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea".Science.289 (5486):1902–1906.Bibcode:2000Sci...289.1902B.doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1902.PMID 10988064.S2CID 1461255.
  169. ^"Interviews with Fellows: Ed Delong".American Academy of Microbiology. Archived fromthe original on 7 August 2016. Retrieved2 July 2016.
  170. ^Bacteria with Batteries, Popular Science, January 2001, Page 55.
  171. ^Béja, O.; Aravind, L.; Koonin, E.V.; Suzuki, M.T.; Hadd, A.; Nguyen, L.P.; Jovanovich, S.B.; Gates, C.M.; Feldman, R.A.; Spudich, J.L.; Spudich, E.N. (2000). "Bacterial rhodopsin: evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea".Science.289 (5486):1902–1906.Bibcode:2000Sci...289.1902B.doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1902.PMID 10988064.
  172. ^Boeuf, Dominique; Audic, Stéphane; Brillet-Guéguen, Loraine; Caron, Christophe; Jeanthon, Christian (2015)."MicRhoDE: a curated database for the analysis of microbial rhodopsin diversity and evolution".Database.2015: bav080.doi:10.1093/database/bav080.ISSN 1758-0463.PMC 4539915.PMID 26286928.
  173. ^Yawo, Hiromu; Kandori, Hideki; Koizumi, Amane (5 June 2015).Optogenetics: Light-Sensing Proteins and Their Applications. Springer. pp. 3–4.ISBN 978-4-431-55516-2. Retrieved30 September 2015.
  174. ^A tiny marine microbe could play a big role in climate changeUniversity of Southern California, Press Room, 8 August 2019.
  175. ^DasSarma, Shiladitya; Schwieterman, Edward W. (11 October 2018)."Early evolution of purple retinal pigments on Earth and implications for exoplanet biosignatures".International Journal of Astrobiology.20 (3):241–250.arXiv:1810.05150.Bibcode:2018arXiv181005150D.doi:10.1017/S1473550418000423.ISSN 1473-5504.S2CID 119341330.
  176. ^Sparks, William B.; DasSarma, S.; Reid, I. N. (December 2006). "Evolutionary Competition Between Primitive Photosynthetic Systems: Existence of an early purple Earth?".American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts.38: 901.Bibcode:2006AAS...209.0605S.
  177. ^Redfield, Alfred C. (1934). "On the Proportions of Organic Derivatives in Sea Water and their Relation to the Composition of Plankton". In Johnstone, James; Daniel, Richard Jellicoe (eds.).James Johnstone Memorial Volume. Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool. pp. 176–92.OCLC 13993674.
  178. ^abArrigo, Kevin R. (2005). "Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles".Nature.437 (7057):349–55.Bibcode:2005Natur.437..349A.doi:10.1038/nature04159.PMID 16163345.S2CID 62781480.
  179. ^Martiny, A.C.; Pham, C.T.; Primeau, F.W.; Vrugt, J.A.; Moore, J.K.; Levin, S.A.; Lomas, M.W. (2013)."Strong latitudinal patterns in the elemental ratios of marine plankton and organic matter".Nature Geoscience.6 (4):279–283.Bibcode:2013NatGe...6..279M.doi:10.1038/ngeo1757.S2CID 5677709.
  180. ^Eppley, R.W.; Peterson, B.J. (1979). "Particulate organic matter flux and planktonic new production in the deep ocean".Nature.282 (5740):677–680.Bibcode:1979Natur.282..677E.doi:10.1038/282677a0.S2CID 42385900.
  181. ^Velicer, Gregory J.; Mendes-Soares, Helena (2007)."Bacterial predators"(PDF).Cell.19 (2):R55 –R56.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.043.PMID 19174136.S2CID 5432036.
  182. ^Stevens, Alison N. P. (2010)."Predation, Herbivory, and Parasitism".Nature Education Knowledge.3 (10): 36.
  183. ^Jurkevitch, Edouard; Davidov, Yaacov (2006). "Phylogenetic Diversity and Evolution of Predatory Prokaryotes".Predatory Prokaryotes. Springer. pp. 11–56.doi:10.1007/7171_052.ISBN 978-3-540-38577-6.
  184. ^Hansen, Per Juel; Bjørnsen, Peter Koefoed; Hansen, Benni Winding (1997)."Zooplankton grazing and growth: Scaling within the 2-2,-μm body size range".Limnology and Oceanography.42 (4):687–704.Bibcode:1997LimOc..42..687H.doi:10.4319/lo.1997.42.4.0687. summarizes findings from many authors.
  185. ^abWassilieff, Maggy (2006)"Plankton - Animal plankton",Te Ara - the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Accessed: 2 November 2019.
  186. ^Varea, C.; Aragon, J.L.; Barrio, R.A. (1999). "Turing patterns on a sphere".Physical Review E.60 (4):4588–92.Bibcode:1999PhRvE..60.4588V.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.60.4588.PMID 11970318.
  187. ^abHemleben, C.; Anderson, O.R.; Spindler, M. (1989).Modern Planktonic Foraminifera. Springer-Verlag.ISBN 978-3-540-96815-3.
  188. ^Foraminifera: History of Study,University College London. Retrieved: 18 November 2019.
  189. ^Finlay, B.J. (2013)."Microaerophily". In Marshall, K.C. (ed.).Advances in Microbial Ecology. Vol. 11. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 22.ISBN 978-1-4684-7612-5.
  190. ^Bernhard, J. M.; Bowser, S.M. (1999). "Benthic Foraminifera of dysoxic sediments: chloroplast sequestration and functional morphology".Earth-Science Reviews.46 (1):149–165.Bibcode:1999ESRv...46..149B.doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00017-3.
  191. ^Dierssen, Heidi; McManus, George B.; Chlus, Adam; Qiu, Dajun; Gao, Bo-Cai; Lin, Senjie (2015)."Space station image captures a red tide ciliate bloom at high spectral and spatial resolution".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.112 (48):14783–14787.Bibcode:2015PNAS..11214783D.doi:10.1073/pnas.1512538112.PMC 4672822.PMID 26627232.
  192. ^Richard Collins (14 November 2016)."Beware the mixotrophs – they can destroy entire ecosystems 'in a matter of hours'".Irish Examiner.
  193. ^"Microscopic body snatchers infest our oceans".Phys.org. 2 August 2017.
  194. ^Eiler A (December 2006)."Evidence for the Ubiquity of Mixotrophic Bacteria in the Upper Ocean: Implications and Consequences".Appl Environ Microbiol.72 (12):7431–7.Bibcode:2006ApEnM..72.7431E.doi:10.1128/AEM.01559-06.PMC 1694265.PMID 17028233.
  195. ^Katechakis A, Stibor H (July 2006). "The mixotrophOchromonas tuberculata may invade and suppress specialist phago- and phototroph plankton communities depending on nutrient conditions".Oecologia.148 (4):692–701.Bibcode:2006Oecol.148..692K.doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0413-4.PMID 16568278.S2CID 22837754.
  196. ^Schoemann, Véronique; Becquevort, Sylvie; Stefels, Jacqueline; Rousseau, Véronique; Lancelot, Christiane (1 January 2005). "Phaeocystis blooms in the global ocean and their controlling mechanisms: a review".Journal of Sea Research. Iron Resources and Oceanic Nutrients – Advancement of Global Environmental Simulations.53 (1–2):43–66.Bibcode:2005JSR....53...43S.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.319.9563.doi:10.1016/j.seares.2004.01.008.
  197. ^"Welcome to the Phaeocystis antarctica genome sequencing project homepage".
  198. ^DiTullio, G. R.;Grebmeier, J. M.; Arrigo, K. R.; Lizotte, M. P.; Robinson, D. H.; Leventer, A.; Barry, J. P.; VanWoert, M. L.; Dunbar, R. B. (2000). "Rapid and early export of Phaeocystis antarctica blooms in the Ross Sea, Antarctica".Nature.404 (6778):595–598.Bibcode:2000Natur.404..595D.doi:10.1038/35007061.PMID 10766240.S2CID 4409009.
  199. ^J, Stefels; L, Dijkhuizen; WWC, Gieskes (20 July 1995)."DMSP-lyase activity in a spring phytoplankton bloom off the Dutch coast, related to Phaeocystis sp. abundance"(PDF).Marine Ecology Progress Series.123:235–243.Bibcode:1995MEPS..123..235S.doi:10.3354/meps123235.
  200. ^Decelle, Johan; Simó, Rafel; Galí, Martí; Vargas, Colomban de; Colin, Sébastien; Desdevises, Yves; Bittner, Lucie; Probert, Ian; Not, Fabrice (30 October 2012)."An original mode of symbiosis in open ocean plankton".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.109 (44):18000–18005.Bibcode:2012PNAS..10918000D.doi:10.1073/pnas.1212303109.ISSN 0027-8424.PMC 3497740.PMID 23071304.
  201. ^Mars Brisbin, Margaret; Grossmann, Mary M.; Mesrop, Lisa Y.; Mitarai, Satoshi (2018)."Intra-host Symbiont Diversity and Extended Symbiont Maintenance in Photosymbiotic Acantharea (Clade F)".Frontiers in Microbiology.9: 1998.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01998.ISSN 1664-302X.PMC 6120437.PMID 30210473.
  202. ^abStoecker, D.K.; Hansen, P.J.; Caron, D.A.; Mitra, A. (2017)."Mixotrophy in the marine plankton".Annual Review of Marine Science.9:311–335.Bibcode:2017ARMS....9..311S.doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060617.PMID 27483121.
  203. ^abMitra, A; Flynn, KJ; Tillmann, U; Raven, J; Caron, D; et al. (2016)."Defining planktonic protist functional groups on mechanisms for energy and nutrient acquisition; incorporation of diverse mixotrophic strategies".Protist.167 (2):106–20.doi:10.1016/j.protis.2016.01.003.hdl:10261/131722.PMID 26927496.
  204. ^Gómez F (2012)."A checklist and classification of living dinoflagellates (Dinoflagellata, Alveolata)".CICIMAR Oceánides.27 (1):65–140.doi:10.37543/oceanides.v27i1.111.
  205. ^Stoecker DK (1999). "Mixotrophy among Dinoflagellates".The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.46 (4):397–401.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04619.x.S2CID 83885629.
  206. ^Suggested Explanation for Glowing Seas--Including Currently Glowing California SeasNational Science Foundation, 18 October 2011.
  207. ^Boltovskoy, Demetrio; Anderson, O. Roger; Correa, Nancy M. (2017).Handbook of the Protists. Springer, Cham. pp. 731–763.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_19.ISBN 9783319281476.
  208. ^Anderson, O. R. (1983).Radiolaria. Springer Science & Business Media.
  209. ^Gast, R. J.; Caron, D. A. (1 November 1996). "Molecular phylogeny of symbiotic dinoflagellates from planktonic foraminifera and radiolaria".Molecular Biology and Evolution.13 (9):1192–1197.doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025684.ISSN 0737-4038.PMID 8896371.
  210. ^Castro P, Huber ME (2010).Marine Biology (8th ed.). McGraw Hill. p. 95.ISBN 978-0071113021.
  211. ^Hastings JW (1996). "Chemistries and colors of bioluminescent reactions: a review".Gene.173 (1 Spec No):5–11.doi:10.1016/0378-1119(95)00676-1.PMID 8707056.
  212. ^Haddock SH, Moline MA, Case JF (2009). "Bioluminescence in the sea".Annual Review of Marine Science.2:443–93.Bibcode:2010ARMS....2..443H.doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081028.PMID 21141672.S2CID 3872860.
  213. ^"Protozoa Infecting Gills and Skin".The Merck Veterinary Manual. Archived fromthe original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved4 November 2019.
  214. ^Brand, Larry E.; Campbell, Lisa; Bresnan, Eileen (2012)."Karenia: The biology and ecology of a toxic genus".Harmful Algae.14:156–178.Bibcode:2012HAlga..14..156B.doi:10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.020.PMC 9891709.PMID 36733478.
  215. ^Buskey, E.J. (1995). "Growth and bioluminescence ofNoctiluca scintillans on varying algal diets".Journal of Plankton Research.17 (1):29–40.doi:10.1093/plankt/17.1.29.
  216. ^Wierer, U.; Arrighi, S.; Bertola, S.; Kaufmann, G.; Baumgarten, B.; Pedrotti, A.; Pernter, P.; Pelegrin, J. (2018)."The Iceman's lithic toolkit: Raw material, technology, typology and use".PLOS ONE.13 (6): e0198292.Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1398292W.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198292.PMC 6010222.PMID 29924811.
  217. ^Thomson, Charles Wyville (2014)Voyage of the Challenger : The Atlantic Cambridge University Press, page235.ISBN 9781108074759.
  218. ^Grethe R. Hasle; Erik E. Syvertsen; Karen A. Steidinger; Karl Tangen (25 January 1996)."Marine Diatoms". In Carmelo R. Tomas (ed.).Identifying Marine Diatoms and Dinoflagellates. Academic Press. pp. 5–385.ISBN 978-0-08-053441-1. Retrieved13 November 2013.
  219. ^Ald, S.M.; et al. (2007)."Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists".Syst. Biol.56 (4):684–689.doi:10.1080/10635150701494127.PMID 17661235.
  220. ^Moheimani, N.R.; Webb, J.P.; Borowitzka, M.A. (2012), "Bioremediation and other potential applications of coccolithophorid algae: A review. . Bioremediation and other potential applications of coccolithophorid algae: A review",Algal Research,1 (2):120–133,doi:10.1016/j.algal.2012.06.002
  221. ^Taylor, A.R.; Chrachri, A.; Wheeler, G.; Goddard, H.; Brownlee, C. (2011)."A voltage-gated H+ channel underlying pH homeostasis in calcifying coccolithophores".PLOS Biology.9 (6): e1001085.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001085.PMC 3119654.PMID 21713028.
  222. ^abHaq B.U. and Boersma A. (Eds.) (1998)Introduction to Marine Micropaleontology Elsevier.ISBN 9780080534961
  223. ^Bruckner, Monica (2020)"Paleoclimatology: How Can We Infer Past Climates?"SERC, Carleton College. Modified 23 July 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  224. ^Earth barreling toward 'Hothouse' state not seen in 50 million years, epic new climate record showsLiveScience, 10 September 2020.
  225. ^Westerhold, Thomas; Marwan, Norbert; Drury, Anna Joy; Liebrand, Diederik; Agnini, Claudia; Anagnostou, Eleni; Barnet, James S. K.; Bohaty, Steven M.; De Vleeschouwer, David; Florindo, Fabio; Frederichs, Thomas; Hodell, David A.; Holbourn, Ann E.; Kroon, Dick; Lauretano, Vittoria; Littler, Kate; Lourens, Lucas J.; Lyle, Mitchell; Pälike, Heiko; Röhl, Ursula; Tian, Jun; Wilkens, Roy H.; Wilson, Paul A.; Zachos, James C. (11 September 2020)."An astronomically dated record of Earth's climate and its predictability over the last 66 million years".Science.369 (6509):1383–1387.Bibcode:2020Sci...369.1383W.doi:10.1126/science.aba6853.hdl:11577/3351324.PMID 32913105.S2CID 221593388.
  226. ^Bob Yirka (29 August 2013)."Soil beneath ocean found to harbor long lived bacteria, fungi and viruses".Phys.org.
  227. ^Ian Sample (2 May 2010)."The oldest living organisms: ancient survivors with a fragile future".The Guardian.
  228. ^Joe Hanson."The oldest living thing in the world".It's Okay to be Smart. Archived fromthe original on 13 July 2018. Retrieved13 July 2018.
  229. ^Willerslev, Eske; Froese, Duane; Gilichinsky, David; Rønn, Regin; Bunce, Michael; Zuber, Maria T.; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Brand, Tina; Munch, Kasper; Nielsen, Rasmus; Mastepanov, Mikhail; Christensen, Torben R.; Hebsgaard, Martin B.; Johnson, Sarah Stewart (4 September 2007)."Ancient bacteria show evidence of DNA repair".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.104 (36):14401–14405.Bibcode:2007PNAS..10414401J.doi:10.1073/pnas.0706787104.PMC 1958816.PMID 17728401.
  230. ^Egan, S., Fukatsu, T. and Francino, M.P., 2020. Opportunities and Challenges to Microbial Symbiosis Research in the Microbiome Era. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01150. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  231. ^Margulis, Lynn; Fester, René (1991).Symbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation. MIT Press.ISBN 9780262132695.
  232. ^Bordenstein, Seth R.; Theis, Kevin R. (2015)."Host Biology in Light of the Microbiome: Ten Principles of Holobionts and Hologenomes".PLOS Biol.13 (8): e1002226.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002226.ISSN 1545-7885.PMC 4540581.PMID 26284777.
  233. ^Theis, K.R., Dheilly, N.M., Klassen, J.L., Brucker, R.M., Baines, J.F., Bosch, T.C., Cryan, J.F., Gilbert, S.F., Goodnight, C.J., Lloyd, E.A. and Sapp, J. (2016) "Getting the hologenome concept right: an eco-evolutionary framework for hosts and their microbiomes".Msystems,1(2).doi:10.1128/mSystems.00028-16. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  234. ^Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., Van Themaat, E.V.L. and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) "Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants".Annual review of plant biology,64: 807–838.doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106.
  235. ^Vandenkoornhuyse, Philippe; Quaiser, Achim; Duhamel, Marie; Le Van, Amandine; Dufresne, Alexis (1 June 2015)."The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont".The New Phytologist.206 (4):1196–1206.doi:10.1111/nph.13312.ISSN 1469-8137.PMID 25655016.
  236. ^Sánchez-Cañizares, C., Jorrín, B., Poole, P.S. and Tkacz, A. (2017) "Understanding the holobiont: the interdependence of plants and their microbiome".Current Opinion in Microbiology,38: 188–196.doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.07.001.
  237. ^Douglas, A.E. and Werren, J.H. (2016) "Holes in the hologenome: why host-microbe symbioses are not holobionts".MBio,7(2).doi:10.1128/mBio.02099-15.
  238. ^Knowlton, N. and Rohwer, F. (2003) "Multispecies microbial mutualisms on coral reefs: the host as a habitat".The American Naturalist,162(S4): S51-S62.doi:10.1086/378684.
  239. ^Pollock, F. Joseph; McMinds, Ryan; Smith, Styles; Bourne, David G.; Willis, Bette L.; Medina, Mónica; Thurber, Rebecca Vega; Zaneveld, Jesse R. (22 November 2018)."Coral-associated bacteria demonstrate phylosymbiosis and cophylogeny".Nature Communications.9 (1): 4921.Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.4921P.doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07275-x.ISSN 2041-1723.PMC 6250698.PMID 30467310.
  240. ^Thompson, J.R., Rivera, H.E., Closek, C.J. and Medina, M. (2015) "Microbes in the coral holobiont: partners through evolution, development, and ecological interactions".Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology,4: 176.doi:10.3389/fcimb.2014.00176.
  241. ^Pita, L., Rix, L., Slaby, B.M., Franke, A. and Hentschel, U. (2018) "The sponge holobiont in a changing ocean: from microbes to ecosystems".Microbiome,6(1): 46.doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0428-1. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  242. ^Ugarelli, K., Chakrabarti, S., Laas, P. and Stingl, U. (2017) "The seagrass holobiont and its microbiome".Microorganisms,5(4): 81.doi:10.3390/microorganisms5040081. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  243. ^Cavalcanti, G.S., Shukla, P., Morris, M., Ribeiro, B., Foley, M., Doane, M.P., Thompson, C.C., Edwards, M.S., Dinsdale, E.A. and Thompson, F.L. (2018) "Rhodoliths holobionts in a changing ocean: host-microbes interactions mediate coralline algae resilience under ocean acidification".BMC Genomics,19(1): 1–13.doi:10.1186/s12864-018-5064-4. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  244. ^Wilhelm, Steven W.; Suttle, Curtis A. (1999)."Viruses and Nutrient Cycles in the Sea".BioScience.49 (10):781–788.doi:10.2307/1313569.ISSN 1525-3244.JSTOR 1313569.
  245. ^Weinbauer, Markus G.; et al. (2007). "Synergistic and antagonistic effects of viral lysis and protistan grazing on bacterial biomass, production and diversity".Environmental Microbiology.9 (3):777–788.Bibcode:2007EnvMi...9..777W.doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01200.x.PMID 17298376.
  246. ^Robinson, Carol, and Nagappa Ramaiah. "Microbial heterotrophic metabolic rates constrain the microbial carbon pump." The American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011.
  247. ^Gutierrez, MH; Jara, AM; Pantoja, S (2016). "Fungal parasites infect marine diatoms in the upwelling ecosystem of the Humboldt current system off central Chile".Environ Microbiol.18 (5):1646–1653.Bibcode:2016EnvMi..18.1646G.doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13257.hdl:10533/148260.PMID 26914416.
  248. ^What is marine snow?NOAA National Ocean Service. Updated:06/25/18.
  249. ^Monroy, P., Hernández-García, E., Rossi, V. and López, C. (2017) "Modeling the dynamical sinking of biogenic particles in oceanic flow".Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics,24(2): 293–305.doi:10.5194/npg-24-293-2017. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License.
  250. ^Simon, M., Grossart, H., Schweitzer, B. and Ploug, H. (2002) "Microbial ecology of organic aggregates in aquatic ecosystems".Aquatic microbial ecology,28: 175–211.doi:10.3354/ame028175.
  251. ^Boetius, Antje; Anesio, Alexandre M.; Deming, Jody W.; Mikucki, Jill A.; Rapp, Josephine Z. (1 November 2015). "Microbial ecology of the cryosphere: sea ice and glacial habitats".Nature Reviews Microbiology.13 (11):677–690.doi:10.1038/nrmicro3522.PMID 26344407.S2CID 20798336.
  252. ^Lutz, Richard A.; Kennish, Michael J. (1993). "Ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities: A review".Reviews of Geophysics.31 (3): 211.Bibcode:1993RvGeo..31..211L.doi:10.1029/93rg01280.ISSN 8755-1209.
  253. ^Kádár, Enikõ; Costa, Valentina; Santos, Ricardo S.; Powell, Jonathan J. (July 2006). "Tissue partitioning of micro-essential metals in the vent bivalve Bathymodiolus azoricus and associated organisms (endosymbiont bacteria and a parasite polychaete) from geochemically distinct vents of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge".Journal of Sea Research.56 (1):45–52.Bibcode:2006JSR....56...45K.doi:10.1016/j.seares.2006.01.002.ISSN 1385-1101.
  254. ^Anderson, Rika E.; Brazelton, William J.; Baross, John A. (2011)."Is the Genetic Landscape of the Deep Subsurface Biosphere Affected by Viruses?".Frontiers in Microbiology.2: 219.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00219.PMC 3211056.PMID 22084639.
  255. ^Anderson, Rika E.; Brazelton, William J.; Baross, John A. (2011)."Is the genetic landscape of the deep subsurface biosphere affected by viruses?".Frontiers in Microbiology.2: 219.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00219.ISSN 1664-302X.PMC 3211056.PMID 22084639.
  256. ^Suttle, Curtis A. (September 2005). "Viruses in the sea".Nature.437 (7057):356–361.Bibcode:2005Natur.437..356S.doi:10.1038/nature04160.ISSN 0028-0836.PMID 16163346.S2CID 4370363.
  257. ^Suttle, Curtis A. (October 2007). "Marine viruses — major players in the global ecosystem".Nature Reviews Microbiology.5 (10):801–812.doi:10.1038/nrmicro1750.ISSN 1740-1526.PMID 17853907.S2CID 4658457.
  258. ^Anderson, Rika E.; Sogin, Mitchell L.; Baross, John A. (3 October 2014)."Evolutionary Strategies of Viruses, Bacteria and Archaea in Hydrothermal Vent Ecosystems Revealed through Metagenomics".PLOS ONE.9 (10): e109696.Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j9696A.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109696.ISSN 1932-6203.PMC 4184897.PMID 25279954.
  259. ^Ortmann, Alice C.; Suttle, Curtis A. (August 2005). "High abundances of viruses in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent system indicates viral mediated microbial mortality".Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers.52 (8):1515–1527.Bibcode:2005DSRI...52.1515O.doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2005.04.002.ISSN 0967-0637.
  260. ^Breitbart, Mya (15 January 2012). "Marine Viruses: Truth or Dare".Annual Review of Marine Science.4 (1):425–448.Bibcode:2012ARMS....4..425B.doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142805.ISSN 1941-1405.PMID 22457982.
  261. ^Goldenfeld, Nigel; Woese, Carl (January 2007). "Biology's next revolution".Nature.445 (7126): 369.arXiv:q-bio/0702015.Bibcode:2007Natur.445..369G.doi:10.1038/445369a.ISSN 0028-0836.PMID 17251963.S2CID 10737747.
  262. ^Deep Carbon Observatory (10 December 2018)."Life in deep Earth totals 15 to 23 billion tons of carbon – hundreds of times more than humans".EurekAlert!. Retrieved11 December 2018.
  263. ^Dockrill, Peter (11 December 2018)."Scientists Reveal a Massive Biosphere of Life Hidden Under Earth's Surface".Science Alert. Retrieved11 December 2018.
  264. ^Gabbatiss, Josh (11 December 2018)."Massive 'deep life' study reveals billions of tonnes of microbes living far beneath Earth's surface".The Independent. Retrieved11 December 2018.
  265. ^Lollar, Garnet S.; Warr, Oliver; Telling, Jon; Osburn, Magdalena R.; Sherwood Lollar, Barbara (2019). "'Follow the Water': Hydrogeochemical Constraints on Microbial Investigations 2.4 km Below Surface at the Kidd Creek Deep Fluid and Deep Life Observatory".Geomicrobiology Journal.36 (10):859–872.Bibcode:2019GmbJ...36..859L.doi:10.1080/01490451.2019.1641770.S2CID 199636268.
  266. ^"World's Oldest Groundwater Supports Life Through Water-Rock Chemistry".deepcarbon.net. Deep Carbon Observatory. 29 July 2019. Archived fromthe original on 10 September 2019.
  267. ^Strange life-forms found deep in a mine point to vast 'underground Galapagos', By Corey S. Powell, 7 Sept. 2019, nbcnews.com.
  268. ^Oldest Water on Earth Found Deep Within the Canadian Shield, 14 December 2016, Maggie Romuld
  269. ^Wu, Katherine J. (28 July 2020)."These Microbes May Have Survived 100 Million Years Beneath the Seafloor – Rescued from their cold, cramped and nutrient-poor homes, the bacteria awoke in the lab and grew".The New York Times. Retrieved31 July 2020.
  270. ^Morono, Yuki; et al. (28 July 2020)."Aerobic microbial life persists in oxic marine sediment as old as 101.5 million years".Nature Communications.11 (3626): 3626.Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3626M.doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17330-1.PMC 7387439.PMID 32724059.
  271. ^abFilee, J.; Tetart, F.; Suttle, C. A.; Krisch, H. M. (2005)."Marine T4-type bacteriophages, a ubiquitous component of the dark matter of the biosphere".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.102 (35):12471–12476.Bibcode:2005PNAS..10212471F.doi:10.1073/pnas.0503404102.ISSN 0027-8424.PMC 1194919.PMID 16116082.
  272. ^University of Tennessee at Knoxville (25 September 2018)."Study: Microbial dark matter dominates Earth's environments".Eurekalert!. Retrieved26 September 2018.
  273. ^Hedlund, Brian P.; Dodsworth, Jeremy A.; Murugapiran, Senthil K.; Rinke, Christian; Woyke, Tanja (2014). "Impact of single-cell genomics and metagenomics on the emerging view of extremophile "microbial dark matter"".Extremophiles.18 (5):865–875.doi:10.1007/s00792-014-0664-7.ISSN 1431-0651.PMID 25113821.S2CID 16888890.
  274. ^May, R.M. (1988). "How many species are there on earth?".Science.241 (4872):1441–1449.Bibcode:1988Sci...241.1441M.doi:10.1126/science.241.4872.1441.PMID 17790039.S2CID 34992724.
  275. ^Locey, K.J.; Lennon, J.T. (2016)."Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.113 (21):5970–5975.Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.5970L.doi:10.1073/pnas.1521291113.PMC 4889364.PMID 27140646.
  276. ^abVitorino, L.C.; Bessa, L.A. (2018)."Microbial diversity: the gap between the estimated and the known".Diversity.10 (2): 46.doi:10.3390/d10020046. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  277. ^abcKarsenti, E.; Acinas, S.G.; Bork, P.; Bowler, C.; De Vargas, C.; Raes, J.; Sullivan, M.; Arendt, D.; Benzoni, F.; Claverie, J.M.; Follows, M. (2011)."A holistic approach to marine eco-systems biology".PLOS Biology.9 (10): e1001177.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001177.PMC 3196472.PMID 22028628.
  278. ^Olsen GJ, Woese CR, Overbeek R (1994)."The winds of (evolutionary) change: breathing new life into microbiology".Journal of Bacteriology.176 (1):1–6.doi:10.2172/205047.PMC 205007.PMID 8282683.
  279. ^Woese, CR (1987)."Bacterial evolution".Microbiological Reviews.51 (2):221–71.doi:10.1128/MMBR.51.2.221-271.1987.PMC 373105.PMID 2439888.
  280. ^abCollins, R. Eric (2019)The Small and Mighty – Microbial LifeNOAA: Ocean Exploration and Research, Gulf of Alaska Seamounts 2019 Expedition.Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  281. ^Käse L, Geuer JK. (2018)"Phytoplankton Responses to Marine Climate Change – An Introduction". In Jungblut S., Liebich V., Bode M. (Eds)YOUMARES 8–Oceans Across Boundaries: Learning from each other, pages 55–72, Springer.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93284-2_5. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  282. ^Franco-Duarte, R.; Černáková, L.; Kadam, S.; Kaushik, K.; Salehi, B.; Bevilacqua, A.; Corbo, M.R.; Antolak, H.; Dybka-Stępień, K.; Leszczewicz, M.; Relison Tintino, S. (2019)."Advances in Chemical and Biological Methods to Identify Microorganisms—From Past to Present".Microorganisms.7 (5): 130.doi:10.3390/microorganisms7050130.PMC 6560418.PMID 31086084. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  283. ^Lozupone, C.A., Stombaugh, J.I., Gordon, J.I., Jansson, J.K. and Knight, R. (2012) "Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota".Nature,489(7415): 220–230.doi:10.1038/nature11550.
  284. ^Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J.F., Halpern, A.L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J.A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K.E., Nelson, W. and Fouts, D.E. (2004) "Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea".Science,304(5667): 66–74.doi:10.1126/science.1093857.
  285. ^Liu, L., Li, Y., Li, S., Hu, N., He, Y., Pong, R., Lin, D., Lu, L. and Law, M. (2012) "Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems".BioMed Research International,2012: 251364.doi:10.1155/2012/251364.
  286. ^Berg, Gabriele; Daria Rybakova, Doreen Fischer, Tomislav Cernava, Marie-Christine Champomier Vergès, Trevor Charles, Xiaoyulong Chen, Luca Cocolin, Kellye Eversole, Gema Herrero Corral, Maria Kazou, Linda Kinkel, Lene Lange, Nelson Lima, Alexander Loy, James A. Macklin, Emmanuelle Maguin, Tim Mauchline, Ryan McClure, Birgit Mitter, Matthew Ryan, Inga Sarand, Hauke Smidt, Bettina Schelkle, Hugo Roume, G. Seghal Kiran, Joseph Selvin, Rafael Soares Correa de Souza, Leo van Overbeek, Brajesh K. Singh, Michael Wagner, Aaron Walsh, Angela Sessitsch and Michael Schloter (2020) "Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges".Microbiome,8(103): 1–22.doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  287. ^Kodzius, R.; Gojobori, T. (2015)."Marine metagenomics as a source for bioprospecting".Marine Genomics.24:21–30.Bibcode:2015MarGn..24...21K.doi:10.1016/j.margen.2015.07.001.hdl:10754/567056.PMID 26204808. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  288. ^Giuliano, Laura; Barbier, Michele; Briand, Frederic, eds. (September 2010).Special Issue: Marine Omics. Microbial Biotechnology, Vol. 3, n°5. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 489–621.
  289. ^Holtorf, Hauke; Guitton, Marie-Christine;Reski, Ralf (2002). "Plant functional genomics".Naturwissenschaften.89 (6):235–249.Bibcode:2002NW.....89..235H.doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0321-3.PMID 12146788.S2CID 7768096.
  290. ^Cain AK, Barquist L, Goodman AL, Paulsen IT, Parkhill J, van Opijnen T (2020)."A decade of advances in transposon-insertion sequencing".Nature Reviews Genetics.21 (9):526–540.doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0244-x.hdl:10033/622374.PMC 7291929.PMID 32533119.
  291. ^Zhang, W., Li, F. and Nie, L. (2010) "Integrating multiple 'omics' analysis for microbial biology: application and methodologies".Microbiology,156(2): 287–301.doi:10.1099/mic.0.034793-0.
  292. ^Singh, R.P. and Kothari, R. (2017)"The omics era and host microbiomes". In: Singh RP, Kothari R, Koringa PG and Singh SP (Eds.)Understanding Host-Microbiome Interactions – An Omics Approach, pages 3–12, Springer.ISBN 9789811050503.doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5050-3_1
  293. ^Capotondi, A., Jacox, M., Bowler, C., Kavanaugh, M., Lehodey, P., Barrie, D., Brodie, S., Chaffron, S., Cheng, W., Dias, D.F., Eveillard, D. and 20 others (2019) "Observational needs supporting marine ecosystems modeling and forecasting: from the global ocean to regional and coastal systems".Frontiers in Marine Science,6: 623.doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00623. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  294. ^Sunagawa, S., Coelho, L. P., Chaffron, S., Kultima, J. R., Labadie, K., Salazar, G., et al. (2015). "Ocean plankton. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome".Science,348: 1261359.doi:10.1126/science.1261359.
  295. ^Guidi, L., Chaffron, S., Bittner, L., Eveillard, D., Larhlimi, A., Roux, S., et al. (2016). "Plankton networks driving carbon export in the oligotrophic ocean".Nature,532: 465–470.doi:10.1038/nature16942.
  296. ^Guyennon, A., Baklouti, M., Diaz, F., Palmieri, J., Beuvier, J., Lebaupin-Brossier, C., et al. (2015). "New insights into the organic carbon export in the Mediterranean Sea from 3-D modelling".Biogeosciences,11: 425–442.doi:10.5194/bg-12-7025-2015.
  297. ^Louca, S., Parfrey, L. W., and Doebeli, M. (2016). "Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome".Science,353: 1272–1277.doi:10.1126/science.aaf4507.
  298. ^Coles, V. J., Stukel, M. R., Brooks, M. T., Burd, A., Crump, B. C., Moran, M. A., et al. (2017). "Ocean biogeochemistry modeled with emergent trait-based genomics".Science,358: 1149–1154.doi:10.1126/science.aan5712.
  299. ^Mock, T., Daines, S.J., Geider, R., Collins, S., Metodiev, M., Millar, A.J., Moulton, V. and Lenton, T.M. (2016) "Bridging the gap between omics and earth system science to better understand how environmental change impacts marine microbes".Global Change Biology,22(1): 61–75.doi:10.1111/gcb.12983. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  300. ^abToseland A, Daines SJ and Clark JR et al. (2013) "The impact of temperature on marine phytoplankton resource allocation and metabolism".Nature Climate Change,3: 979– 984.doi:10.1038/nclimate1989.
  301. ^Martiny AC, Pham CTA, Primeau FW, Vrugt JA, Moore JK, Levin SA and Lomas MW (2013) "Strong latitudinal patterns in the elemental ratios of marine plankton and organic matter".Nature Geoscience,6: 279–283.doi:10.1038/ngeo1757.

General references

[edit]
Groups
Streptococcus pyogenes
Microbiology
Motion
Ecology
Plants
Marine
Human related
Techniques
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marine_microorganisms&oldid=1274437391#Marine_microplankton"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp