Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Caning of Michael Fay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromMichael P. Fay)
1993–1994 Singaporean judicial sentence of an American teenager
icon
This articleneeds attention from an expert in Singapore. The specific problem is:Unclear narrative, verification of facts needed.WikiProject Singapore may be able to help recruit an expert.(May 2023)

In 1994, a court inSingapore sentenced an American teenager, Michael Fay (born May 30th, 1975),[1] to belashed six times with a cane for violating theVandalism Act. This caused a temporary strain in relations between Singapore and the United States.[2]

Fay was arrested for stealing road signs and vandalizing 18 cars over a ten-day period in September 1993. Faypled guilty, but he later claimed that he was advised that such a plea would preclude caning and that his confession was false, that he never vandalized any cars, and that the only crime he committed was stealing road signs. Althoughcaning is a routine court sentence in Singapore, Fay's sentence garnered controversy and was widely covered in the media in the United States, as it was believed to be the first judicial corporal punishment involving an American citizen.[3] The number of cane strokes in Fay's sentence was ultimately reduced from six to four after United States officials requested leniency, and the sentence was carried out on May 5th, 1994.

Early life

[edit]

Fay's parents divorced when he was a child. After living with his father for a time, he was sent to Singapore to live with his mother and stepfather, where he was enrolled in theSingapore American School.[4]

Theft and vandalism in Singapore

[edit]

In September 1993, 67 cars were vandalized in various neighborhoods of Singapore. The damage included spray painting and being pelted with eggs, and at least one had its windshield smashed.[2][5]

The Singapore police eventually arrested two teenagers who were driving a car similar to one that witnesses had described as being involved in the vandalism. During questioning, the two gave seven names, all male students from theSingapore American School andISS International School, whom police tracked down and raided. They found about 67 stolen items, including a telephone booth and road signs.[5]

Fay was one of these students.[2][6] He later claimed that he had been intimidated and threatened during the police interrogation,[2] and maintained that he had been advised such a plea would preclude caning and that his confession was false, that he never vandalized any cars, and that the only crime he committed was stealing signs.[7]

Under the 1966Vandalism Act, originally passed to curb the spread of politicalgraffiti and which specifically penalized vandalism of government property,[4] Fay was sentenced on March 3, 1994, to four months in jail, a fine ofS$3,500 (at the time equivalent toUS$2,230 or£1,450), and sixstrokes of the cane.[8][9] Another student who pleaded not guilty was sentenced to eight months in prison and 12 strokes of the cane.[10]

Fay's lawyers lost on appeal after arguing that the Vandalism Act provided caning only forindelible forms of graffiti vandalism, and that the damaged cars had been cheaply restored to their original condition.[6]

Response

[edit]

Media and public reactions

[edit]

Following Fay's sentence, the case received coverage by the American, Singaporean and international media.[11]

Some US news outlets launched scathing attacks on Singapore's judicial system for what they considered an "archaic punishment", while others turned the issue into one of Singapore asserting "Asian values" towards "western decadence".[12]The New York Times,The Washington Post and theLos Angeles Times ran editorials and op-eds condemning the punishment.[13]USA Today reported that the caning involved "bits of flesh flying with each stroke."[14]

However, Singapore also found supporters among the foreign media and the US public. For example,Chicago Tribune columnist Mike Royko reported that he had been sent a large number of letters, nearly all of which supported the punishment.[15][16] ALos Angeles Times poll found that Americans were evenly divided (49% approved, 48% disapproved) as to the appropriateness of the punishment, but would have only been 36% in favor had the sentence been handed down inside the US.[17]

From the United States government

[edit]

The official position of theClinton administration was that although it recognized Singapore's right to punish Fay within thedue process of law, the punishment of caning was "excessive" for a teenager who committed a non-violent crime.

TheUnited States Embassy in Singapore claimed that, while the graffiti and physical damage to the cars was not permanent, caning could leave Fay with permanent physical scars.[4][18]

Bill Clinton, the then-President of the United States, also called Fay's punishment "extreme" and "mistaken", and pressured the Singapore government to grant Fay clemency from caning. Two dozen United States senators signed a letter to the Singapore government also appealing for clemency.[19]

From the Singapore government

[edit]

TheSingapore government stood its ground.[3]

Nevertheless, on May 4th that year, the Singapore government reduced the severity of both sentences out of consideration for President Clinton as it valued thegood historical relations between the two countries.[20] Fay was caned on May 5th, 1994, at the Queenstown Remand Centre.[21][22]

Aftermath

[edit]

After his release from prison in June 1994, Fay returned to the United States to live with his biological father.[23] He gave several television interviews, including one with his American lawyer onCNN withLarry King on June 29th, 1994, in which he admitted taking road signs but denied vandalizing cars.[24] While he did not detail his experience, he said that he was "ill-treated" at times during questioning, but had shaken hands with the caning operative after his four strokes had been administered and the prison guards when he was released.

Several months after returning to the United States, Fay suffered burns to his hands and face after abutane incident.[25][26][27] He was subsequently admitted to theHazelden rehabilitation program forbutane abuse.[25] He said that sniffing butane "made [him] forget what happened in Singapore."[28] In 1996, he was cited inFlorida for a number of violations, including careless driving, reckless driving, not reporting a crash, and having an open bottle of alcohol in a car.[29] Later, in 1998, still in Florida, Fay was arrested for possession ofmarijuana anddrug paraphernalia, charges to which he confessed but was acquitted[30] because of technical errors in his arrest.[31]

In June 2010, Fay's case was recalled in international news, after another foreigner in Singapore, Swiss nationalOliver Fricker, was sentenced to five months in jail and three strokes of the cane for trespassing a rail depot to vandalise a metro train that is a part of the country'sMass Rapid Transit.[32]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Michael Fay".National Library Board (Singapore). October 2021. RetrievedJanuary 13, 2025.
  2. ^abcdShenon, Philip (March 16, 1994)."A Flogging Sentence Brings a Cry of Pain in U.S."The New York Times.Archived from the original on August 23, 2017.
  3. ^abWallace, Charles P. (March 9, 1994)."Singapore Blasts Back at Clinton in Caning Case".Los Angeles Times. RetrievedMarch 25, 2009.
  4. ^abcReyes, Alejandro (May 25, 1994)."Rough Justice: A Caning in Singapore Stirs Up a Fierce Debate About Crime And Punishment".Asiaweek. Hong Kong.Archived from the original on May 11, 2019.
  5. ^abTan, Ooi Boon (October 7, 1993)."9 foreign students held for vandalism".The Straits Times. Singapore. p. 1. RetrievedMarch 6, 2023.
  6. ^abChong, Elena (April 1, 1994)."Fay loses appeal".The Straits Times. Singapore.
  7. ^Shenon, Philip (April 17, 1994)."Overlooked Question in Singapore Caning Debate: Is the Teen-Ager Guilty?".The New York Times.
  8. ^Wallace, Charles P. (March 4, 1994)."Ohio Youth to be Flogged in Singapore".Los Angeles Times.
  9. ^Watts, David (March 4, 1994)."Singapore sentences American to caning".The Times. London.
  10. ^Stewart, Ian (April 22, 1994)."Flogging for vandal".South China Morning Post. Hong Kong.Archived from the original on September 20, 2010.
  11. ^Parascandola, Rocco (August 1994)."Singapore Hosts Some Most Unruly Guests".American Journalism Review. Archived fromthe original on September 30, 2007. RetrievedFebruary 24, 2007.
  12. ^Stone, Andrea (March 10, 1994)."Whipping penalty judged too harsh – by some".USA Today. Washington DC.Archived from the original on June 17, 2020.
  13. ^"What US columnists say about Fay's caning".The Straits Times. Singapore. April 8, 1994. RetrievedAugust 13, 2019.
  14. ^"Don't copy Singapore".USA Today. Washington DC. April 5, 1994.Archived from the original on February 8, 2009.
  15. ^Usborne, David (April 2, 1994)."'Joe Public' backs caning of American".The Independent. London. RetrievedMay 16, 2023.
  16. ^Royko, Mike (March 30, 1994)."Readers get 'behind' flogging of vandal".Daily News. New York. RetrievedMay 18, 2023 – via www.corpun.com.
  17. ^Brownstein, Ronald (April 21, 1994)."Singapore's Caning Sentence Divides Americans, Poll Finds".Los Angeles Times. RetrievedMay 18, 2023.
  18. ^Fawcett, Karen (March 9, 1994)."Americans in Singapore condemn caning for teen".USA Today. Washington DC.Archived from the original on June 19, 2008. RetrievedMarch 25, 2009.
  19. ^Richardson, Michael (May 5, 1994)."Responding to Clinton's Plea, Singapore Cuts 6 Lashes to 4".The New York Times. Archived fromthe original on February 9, 2017. RetrievedFebruary 17, 2017.
  20. ^Branigin, William (May 5, 1994)."Singapore Reduces American's Sentence".The Washington Post.
  21. ^Wallace, Charles P. (June 22, 1994)."Singapore Frees Flogged U.S. Teen-Ager".Los Angeles Times. Archived fromthe original on May 13, 2016. RetrievedMay 13, 2016.
  22. ^Shenon, Philip (May 6, 1994)."Singapore Carries Out Caning of U.S. Teenager".The New York Times. Archived fromthe original on April 24, 2017.
  23. ^"The Road From Singapore".Daily News. New York. June 22, 1994.Archived from the original on March 8, 2015 – via www.corpun.com.
  24. ^"Larry King Live".CNN. June 29, 1994.Archived from the original on March 8, 2015.
  25. ^ab"Michael Fay,"People Magazine, December 26, 1994, p. 60.
  26. ^"Drug Rehab For Teen Caned in Singapore,"Chicago Tribune, September 29, 1994, p. 14.
  27. ^"The Nation,"USA Today, Washington, D.C., September 29, 1994, p. 03A.
  28. ^"Teen Punished in Singapore Has Drug Habit – Michael Fay Was Sniffing Butane,"Times-Picayune, New Orleans, September 29, 1994, p. A24.
  29. ^"Q&A,"The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, October 13, 2003, p. B2.
  30. ^Flatley, Kerry A. (April 9, 1998)."Boy Caned in Singapore Makes News Again".The Christian Science Monitor. Boston MA. p. 18. Archived fromthe original on June 24, 2016.
  31. ^"Drug Charges Dropped,"Asiaweek, Hong Kong, June 29, 1998, p. 1.
  32. ^"Graffiti man faces Singapore caning".BBC News. June 25, 2010.Archived from the original on June 28, 2010. RetrievedDecember 5, 2010.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Latif, Asad (1994).The Flogging of Singapore: The Michael Fay Affair. Singapore: Times Books International.ISBN 981-204-530-9
  • Baratham, Gopal (1994).The Caning of Michael Fay. Singapore: KRP Publication.ISBN 981-00-5747-4
  • The Asiaweek Newsmap (April 27, 1994).Asiaweek.
  • Chew, Valerie (August 5, 2009)."Michael Fay",Singapore Infopedia. National Library Board.
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caning_of_Michael_Fay&oldid=1321510270"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp